Cloud Hosting

Physicist Will Kinneys Infinity of Worlds: Cosmic Inflation and the Beginning of the Universe starts with the background needed to understand whats called the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model of cosmology, often thought of as the standard model of Big Bang cosmology because its been the most successful at matching current astronomical observations. The lambda stands for the cosmological constant, which represents the pressure caused by dark energy, the driver of cosmic inflation.

Kinney goes on to explain that thanks to the CDM and our observations, Precision cosmology has reached the point where it is not only possible to test broad predictions of inflationary theory but also possible to test specific models for inflation and therefore test the underlying particle physics, at energy scales vastly beyond the reach of terrestrial accelerators. Infinity of Worlds also details which observations and tests match the CDM model, like primordial density perturbations (aka scalar perturbations). Primordial gravitational waves (aka tensor perturbations), on the other hand, have not yet been observed.

Infinity of Worlds describes a number of different tests some of them easily achieved, others further off in the future which can be used to determine the viability of the CDM model. Importantly, the models are predictive, The simplest predictions, such as near scale invariance, superhorizon correlations, and Gaussian perturbations, have already been confirmed to a high precision single-field inflation makes predictions that have not yet been tested [] inflation is a well-posed scientific theory in the classic sense of predictivity and falsifiability in fact with great detail and precision. Kinney makes a very strong case here.

Chapter 7 of Infinity of Worlds, Eternal Inflation and the Multiverse, starts off with a quote from John Miltons Paradise Lost, and waxes philosophical and historical for the first few pages. This marks a distinct shift in the books tone and content, and reveals Kinneys perspective about cosmology in a larger sense, beyond any particular model. Luckily, he doesnt shy away from his doggedly detailed explanations, saying that:

in constructing a picture of the early universe that explains its current observed properties, we find that almost any model results in the prediction that inflation runs out of control forever into the future and there should be an infinite number of universes like our own, embedded in a larger, eternally self-reproducing inflationary space-time.

Importantly, Kinney differentiates the inflationary multiverse from the quantum one.Despite its quantum mechanical origin, the multiverse generated by eternal inflation is in no way related to the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, he says, and that the universes here are physically real.

Infinity of Worlds digs into the fascinating issues that the inflationary multiverse presents, no matter where they lead. Much to his credit, Kinney makes clear that despite its many successes, the CDM model must be incomplete, because it cant provide explanations for the universes homogeneity, flatness, and local structure (all of these are defined very clearly and helpfully in the book). Therefore, even if all of CDM is eventually verified, there will still be important aspects of our universe it simply doesnt say anything about.

Infinity of Worlds then looks at how CDM bumps up against other modern theories, like string theory. With more than 10500 possible vacuum configurations for our universe provided by string theory, wed have to assume that the CDMs multiverse would give rise to real universes in each configuration, an infinite number of times. Things get even more interesting when taking into account recent advances in quantum gravity.

So where does that leave the CDM model? In the final chapter of Infinity of Worlds, Kinney muses about just so stories, which explain something in a way thats unfalsifiable. Kinney explains the three foundational issues with CDM: geodesic incompleteness, no theory of initial conditions, and trans-Planckian perturbations. All of these uncertainties are related to our lack of understanding of how to self-consistently construct a quantum theory of gravity, he says. And thus we are back to quantum gravity and string theory.

But Kinneys perspective is even broader and more philosophical than this, saying, Is any theory we construct of the ultimate origin of the universe a just so story, inherently unfalsifiable? The answer to his own question, Quite possibly.

AIPT Science is co-presented by AIPT and the New York City Skeptics.

Want to take our relationship to the next level? Become a patron today to gain access to exclusive perks, such as:

View post:

'Infinity of Worlds' expands your horizons - AIPT