Page 867«..1020..866867868869..880890..»

Maximising Growth and Accelerating Value Creation with Digital … – Alvarez & Marsal

Advisors love to tout the failures of traditional transformation (75 percent of all transformations fail). At A&M, we are increasingly seeing and helping clients overcome an even more pressing matterless than 50 percent of all digital, data, and AI spend by the F1000 is delivering ANY value to shareholders, customers, or employees.

We believe business strategy and transformation have evolved, shifting from digital transformation within a technology function to a catalyst for CEOs, CFOs, COOs, and heads of business to drive a step change in how they capture the next wave of value with greater pace and certainty.

In the first part of the series, we will focus on how to deliver value from digital investment, redefining why, what, how, and when to invest, spanning the use cases and exciting solutions tech has to offer, new organizational muscles including new delivery models, and effective technology partnership models with a clear case and payback.

Technology and technologists have evolved and become mainstream over the past decade, infusing the breadth, depth, and pace by which companies transform and deliver greater results. Digital, a catch-all term for many, has redefined how companies emerge from traditional cost-cutting measures in the back office or SG&A (Selling General and Administrative Expenses) and get fit for exponential growth in product and service development, customer engagement across touchpoints, complex supply chains, and growing partner ecosystems.

Tech has evolved, with the continued growth of industry stalwarts, such as Microsoft, Google, and SAP leading the way in the mainstream adoption of as a service business models, the internet of things (IoT), advanced analytics through gen AI, and AR/VR in both the consumers living room and enterprise workspace. The rise of the software defined enterprise has crossed over from OEMs (Original Equipment manufacturers) in Telco and High Tech to more traditional industries such as Automotive and Industrial Products, delivering new levels of configuration, personalization, and value-added services to customers. Multi-cloud and low code platform-based apps, along with microservices-based platforms, are the norm and the path forward to lower the barriers of entry for smaller technology players and competition, while driving greater reuse, scale, and economics for those investing in the technology in the first place.

External forces have accelerated these trends: COVID-19 forced companies to work and operate remotely, setting a new standard for workplace technology and security. ChatGPTs recent rush into the spotlight has put into question age-old processes in creative or product management, customer care or employee services. Sustainability Scope 2 and 3 requirements are driving a level of end-to-end visibility, controls, insights, and intelligent automation never thought possible in todays global supply chain.

Companies are now approaching a new wave of technology hype and investment renewals, without a clear payback from the last wave. CDOs, CIOs, and CTOs need to evolve from being the new kid on the block, an evangelist or a corporate investment, to becoming a tech Profit & Loss (P&L) owner or driver. Financial and operational rigour are table stakes, with medals earned based on meeting and exceeding your annual plans, measured through the lens of traditional P&L Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). IT functions have an incredible opportunity to set the tone for a dynamic step change in performance improvement within their functions and lead the way for reinvestment across the enterprise. (Read more about our perspective on how to practically align your IT investments to business value here).

More importantly, leading CFOs, COOs, CMOs, and heads of sales or product understand the technology functions, the services they provide, their value, and cost compared to peer groups across the industry. Effective digital and data leaders are acutely aware of the concerns of the shareholders and CEO that digital investments are not delivering the outcomes or value based on the original case. They focus on specific, well known and understood use cases, rewiring the business to both drive and benefit from the technology change, and a shift to only owning core capabilities while relying on strategic partners to overcome the gaps.

Leaders must go beyond the illusion of new use cases defined by technology vendors and resist the temptation to spend time creating new ones or focusing on unproven technology platforms (anyone remember the promise of 5G and Edge for Enterprise, or the Metaverse?). Instead, they should focus on existing and well understood use cases and how emerging or mature tech will benefit them further based on todays KPIs, baselines, and targets.Moreover, leaders must effectively deliver complex use cases and their solutions by combining relevant base technologies (e.g., AI, IoT sensors, geo-location, and AR/VR powering very different solutions in personalized retail offers or industrial plant visual inspections). This requires an advanced understanding of each and a practical view on how well their organization can quickly architect, integrate or engineer, and maximize their value together.

Finally, leaders should ask themselves: Which use cases are of highest value? What problem are we trying to solve, how does it align to P&L contribution, and who owns solving it? What is the starting point and intended outcome? Whats the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) required to validate those assumptions? How do we get to scale fast? Should we let others invest first and be fast followers? Build practical business cases that embed the costs of building, changing and operating the technology over time as well as the business change required to adopt and evolve solutions with market feedback.

For example, a global Consumer Goods leader fully loaded the IT and SI cost of deploying and operating its Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform as well as its data transformation as part of its cost to sell, attributing future improvements in its customer targeting, traffic, basket sizes, and conversion to those investments. This created joint accountability for outcomes and commitments across business and technology functions and accelerated a change in behaviour as part of a broader shift in the business model to agile commercial teams.

Use cases and technology solutions in isolation dont drive the change required to meet the case. The business operations in commercial, the plant, field or supply chain, and support functionsneed to adapt their workflows, organization and skills, ways of working and RACI, and ability to use new forms of information, insight, or tools to drive faster and more efficient actions and/or more effective results. The business needs to operate as modern software engineering and product companies, embracing what digital, data, and AI have to offer to accelerate the journey.

In turn, technology functions should elevate the importance of Portfolio Management and Target Architecture Management. Leaders must go beyond the basics: maintaining legacy, ensuring nothing breaks, and meeting rising security standards. They should define and steer tech investments with a strong financial grip and continuous Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) improvement to balance where to invest to save, where to invest in the new, and where to continue to sweat the asset. Return on investment in tech requires the careful balance of delivering point solutions with capabilities that enable and deploy many use cases with a common technology platform.

For example, a global Industrial Products leader, recently transformed its asset management functions to harness the full benefits of technology, data, automation and AI, resulting in a radical improvement in asset productivity and maintenance cost reduction. To ensure the successful implementation of the business case at scale across geographic sites, the work included the redesign of the manufacturing and supply chain processes. This transformation infused new perspectives drawn from transferrable technology solutions proven in other industries, while setting out clear changes to the RACI, KPIs, and incentives across the business and with partners.

Transforming technology functions in isolation yields limited return on investment. The true value lies in framing and extending those tech investments in support of critical use cases and new business models. Leading technology functions evolve into internal tech service providers and focus on mastering fewer core capabilities, effectively consuming those few services at scale. With that clarity on what is core, leaders deeply entrench themselves in the business, supported by agile digital factories delivered by strategic partners an ecosystem that is incentivised to invest in areas that directly contribute to the P&L.

Successful tech service providers effectively tap into the ecosystem to access and co-develop in-demand capabilities and skills. They then focus on exposing and addressing business needs, while maximizing delivery flexibility. Critical to this journey is the evolution of procurement in support of the business and technology areas to ensure this ecosystem is proactively engaged and given a front row seat to the challenges, opportunities, and upside of helping leaders grow.

At A&M, we partner with industry leaders to shape, create or transform, and operate high-performing and modern businesses. We help clients understand, adopt, and get the most out of technology investments to accelerate business transformation and growth. This is achieved through data-driven analysis and monitoring of P&Ls, defining and launching new products or services, acquiring and retaining great customers with intelligent commercial, supply chain, and service delivery operations.

We draw from our heritage as business owners and operators in Private Equity and Corporates not only to assess and guide but to take action. We work alongside executives to make practical decisions fast, pivot to execution, and always balance the need for near-term efficiency with cash to fuel future investments in growth and innovation with confidence. Our results speak for themselves; across sectors we help clients deliver 20 to 25 percent reductions in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) in 12-18 months, with an additional upside of 10 percent in reductions complemented with targeted reinvestments to fuel new sources of top-line growth over a 24-month time horizon.

A&Ms Digital and Technology Services team supports companies through the full lifecycle of a business transformation across the enterprise, within business functions in the front office and support functions, and within IT / OT and other technology service areas.

Specifically, we help you:

Here is the original post:

Maximising Growth and Accelerating Value Creation with Digital ... - Alvarez & Marsal

Read More..

India’s Infosys signs $1.5 billion contract to leverage AI solutions – Reuters

An employee walks past a signage board in the Infosys campus at the Electronics City IT district in Bangalore, February 28, 2012. REUTERS/Vivek Prakash/File Photo Acquire Licensing Rights

BENGALURU, Sept 15 (Reuters) - India's second-largest software services exporter Infosys (INFY.NS) said it signed a $1.5 billion contract for a 15-year period with a "global company".

Under the deal, Infosys will provide enhanced digital experiences and business operation services, leveraging the company's platforms and artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, it said on Thursday.

Infosys did not name the company nor mention whether it is an existing client.

Earlier in the month, U.S. chip maker Nvidia (NVDA.O) announced AI partnerships with Indian conglomerate Reliance Industries (RELI.NS) and the Tata group's Tata Consultancy Services (TCS.NS) to develop generative applications.

In July, Infosys signed a $2 billion deal with an existing client to provide AI and automation services for five years.

Shares of the company were marginally high at 0.4%, trimming the stock's losses to 0.1% so far this year compared to a 15.46% rise in the Nifty IT (.NIFTYIT) index.

Reporting by Manvi Pant in Bengaluru; Editing by Janane Venkatraman

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Follow this link:

India's Infosys signs $1.5 billion contract to leverage AI solutions - Reuters

Read More..

AI now generates music with CD-quality audio from text, and its only getting better – Ars Technica

Imagine typing "dramatic intro music" and hearing a soaring symphony or writing "creepy footsteps" and getting high-quality sound effects. That's the promise of Stable Audio, a text-to-audio AI model announced Wednesday by Stability AI that can synthesize stereo 44.1 kHz music or sounds from written descriptions. Before long, similar technology may challenge musicians for their jobs.

If you'll recall, Stability AI is the company that helped fund the creation of Stable Diffusion, a latent diffusion image synthesis model released in August 2022. Not content to limit itself to generating images, the company branched out into audio by backing Harmonai, an AI lab that launched music generator Dance Diffusion in September.

Now Stability and Harmonai want to break into commercial AI audio production with Stable Audio. Judging by production samples, it seems like a significant audio quality upgrade from previous AI audio generators we've seen.

On its promotional page, Stability provides examples of the AI model in action with prompts like "epic trailer music intense tribal percussion and brass" and "lofi hip hop beat melodic chillhop 85 bpm." It also offers samples of sound effects generated using Stable Audio, such as an airline pilot speaking over an intercom and people talking in a busy restaurant.

To train its model, Stability partnered with stock music provider AudioSparx and licensed a data set "consisting of over 800,000 audio files containing music, sound effects, and single-instrument stems, as well as corresponding text metadata." After feeding 19,500 hours of audio into the model, Stable Audio knows how to imitate certain sounds it has heard on command because the sounds have been associated with text descriptions of them within its neural network.

Stablility AI

Stable Audio contains several parts that work together to create customized audio quickly. One part shrinks the audio file down in a way that keeps its important features while removing unnecessary noise. This makes the system both faster to teach and quicker at creating new audio. Another part uses text (metadata descriptions of the music and sounds) to help guide what kind of audio is generated.

To speed things up, the Stable Audio architecture operates on a heavily simplified, compressed audio representation to reduce inference time (the amount of time it takes for a machine learning model to generate an output once it has been given an input). According to Stability AI, Stable Audio can render 95 seconds of 16-bit stereo audio at a 44.1 kHz sample rate (often called "CD quality" because it matches the technical specifications of the CD format) in less than one second on an Nvidia A100 GPU. The A100 is a beefy data center GPU designed for AI use, and it's far more capable than a typical desktop gaming GPU.

While the generated audio may meet CD specifications in bit depth and sample rate, it's worth noting that the actual perceptual quality of the music Stable Audio produces can vary wildly, particularly because the audio is generated from a compressed representation in the dataset.

As mentioned, Stable Audio isn't the first music generator based on latent diffusion techniques. Last December, we covered Riffusion, a hobbyist take on an audio version of Stable Diffusion, though its resulting generations were far from Stable Audio's samples in quality. In January, Google released MusicLM, an AI music generator for 24 kHz audio, and Meta launched a suite of open source audio tools (including a text-to-music generator) called AudioCraft in August. Now, with 44.1 kHz stereo audio, Stable Diffusion is upping the ante.

Stability says Stable Audio will be available in a free tier and a $12 monthly Pro plan. With the free option, users can generate up to 20 tracks per month, each with a maximum length of 20 seconds. The Pro plan expands these limits, allowing for 500 track generations per month and track lengths of up to 90 seconds. Future Stability releases are expected to include open source models based on the Stable Audio architecture, as well as training code for those interested in developing audio generation models.

As it stands, it's looking like we might be on the edge of production-quality AI-generated music with Stable Audio, considering its audio fidelity. Will musicians be happy if they get replaced by AI models? Likely not, if history has shown us anything from AI protests in the visual arts field. For now, a human can easily outclass anything AI can generate, but that may not be the case for long. Either way, AI-generated audio may become another tool in a professional's audio production toolbox.

Read the original:

AI now generates music with CD-quality audio from text, and its only getting better - Ars Technica

Read More..

An A.I. Leader Urges Regulation and a Rethink – The New York Times

Mustafa Suleyman is one of the worlds leading artificial intelligence entrepreneurs, having co-founded not one but two start-ups at the cutting edge of the most transformative technology since the internet.

Mr. Suleyman, 39, is C.E.O. of Inflection AI, the company he started last year with Reid Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn. In June, the firm closed a $1.3 billion funding round that included Microsoft and Nvidia, the leading A.I. chip maker, and that reportedly valued the company at about $4 billion. (Its chatbot, Pi, is designed to be a personal digital companion.)

Mr. Suleyman also co-founded DeepMind, an A.I. pioneer that Google acquired in 2014. He left Google early last year and joined Greylock Partners, a venture capital firm, where Hoffman is also a partner.

Now he has written a book, The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the 21st Centurys Greatest Dilemma, that calls for an urgent shift in how we think about and contain A.I. Failing to do so, he says, will leave us humans in the worst position: unable to tap into the huge opportunities of A.I. and at risk of being subsumed by a technology that poses an existential threat.

Mr. Suleyman wants governments to regulate A.I. and appoint cabinet-level tech ministers, and says the United States should use its dominance in advanced chips to enforce global standards. He has also called for the creation of a governance regime modeled on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to make the work of private companies in A.I. more transparent.

Such agreements may be difficult to achieve at a time of growing global tensions, but they are timely as lawmakers unveil proposals about how A.I. should be overseen. Chuck Schumer, the Senate leader, will meet top tech executives, including Elon Musk and Satya Nadella, the C.E.O. of Microsoft, this week to discuss regulations.

Mr. Suleyman spoke to DealBook about his book, which was released last week. This conversation has been condensed and edited for clarity.

Why write a book a very analogue approach to outline your ideas?

It is a form of radical accountability. I want to be able to look back in a decade and see if my predictions were correct. And doing that on the record is intellectually very honest and healthy, rather than doing it in a series of tweets, blog posts and op-eds.

Why do you describe the book as a love letter to the nation-state?

Its a wake-up call to policymakers, politicians and citizens. We have invented a system of noncommercial checks and balances which holds centralized power accountable in the public interest. That system has evolved over many years away from monarchy, dictatorship and authoritarianism toward free and open liberal democracy. It means that we can do sensible taxation and redistribution to prevent inequality. This is the best tool we have, so we should stick with it and keep trying to defend it.

Youve suggested a new Turing test to understand the capability of A.I. and what jobs will be replaced: Give an A.I. $100,000 and ask it to make $1 million on an online retail platform. How would that work?

The real question for the next decade is what can an artificial capable intelligence do in practice? I proposed a very simple framework which tries to cover a wide range of skills that a small entrepreneur might have. Can you come up with a new product idea, can you have it designed, get it manufactured and promote it, and then try to turn a profit? Those skills creativity, imagination, planning negotiation, logistics, prioritization, collaboration are fundamental to what makes us successful in the workplace. If an A.I. can do 20, 50 or 90 percent of those tasks, that tells us something quite profound about what we are unleashing in the world and which other kinds of jobs it might replace.

How have your peers responded to your ideas?

There are lots of different clusters in Silicon Valley. People like Satya are very forward thinking about these things and definitely lean into the responsibility that the companies have to do the right thing.

But there are definitely skeptics. Marc Andreessen, the venture capital investor, just thinks that theres not going to be much of a downside. Its all going to be fine and dandy. Im as much of an accelerationist as Andreessen, but Im just more wide-eyed and comfortable talking about the potential harms, and I think that is a more intellectually honest position.

How do you see the state of relations between democratic governments and Silicon Valley?

We are seeing a lot of positive signs on this front. Tech companies are meaningfully engaging, and governments are starting to get proactive. This hasnt always happened, so we are already going in the right direction. Truth is, this is only just the beginning. A lot more hard work is needed, but the foundations are starting to come into view.

Follow this link:

An A.I. Leader Urges Regulation and a Rethink - The New York Times

Read More..

Adobe Earnings: Creative Cloud Drives Strength While Firefly AI … – Morningstar

Key Morningstar Metrics for AdobeWhat We Thought of Adobes Earnings

Wide-moat Adobe ADBE reported good third-quarter results, including revenue and non-GAAP earnings per share that exceeded the top end of guidance and our expectations along with it. We characterize managements fourth-quarter guidance as in line with investor expectations, which, given recent strength and Firefly AI now generating revenue, could be interpreted as a slight disappointment. We think this mentality misses the mark given such a short-term focus. Further, management will provide fiscal 2024 targets within its fourth quarter results in December, so in-line guidance for one quarter matters less to us here. To begin to accommodate recently announced price increases in the area of 10% for various Creative Cloud and single-app instances, we are modestly raising our growth estimates over the next several years. We have increased our fair value estimate to $510 from $485, although after a strong run we see shares as fairly valued.

Adobe is juggling many balls at present, with the recent general availability of Firefly along with several other solutions, price increases, the looming Figma acquisition, and other changes on the pricing and packaging front. We see these as uniformly positive for the company and expect Adobe to remain the clear leader in the creative market as a result. We will be looking for more details on innovation, bundling, and growth opportunities at Adobe MAX, Adobe Summit, and fourth quarter results, which are all on the horizon. Net new creative ARR was $464 million in the quarter, compared with guidance of $410 million.

Third quarter revenue grew 13% year-over-year in constant currency (10% as reported) to $4.89 billion, exceeding the top end of guidance at $4.87 billion. Digital media grew 11% year-over-year as reported and effectively drove all of the upside in the quarter relative to our model, while digital experience grew 10%. Within digital media, we see both Creative Cloud and Acrobat as having strong quarters.

The author or authors do not own shares in any securities mentioned in this article.Find out about Morningstars editorial policies.

Read more:

Adobe Earnings: Creative Cloud Drives Strength While Firefly AI ... - Morningstar

Read More..

EU announces initiative to fast-track supercomputer access for AI … – Cointelegraph

European Union President Ursula von der Leyen announced a new initiative to give artificial intelligence (AI) startups expedited access to European supercomputers.

The announcement came during the presidents 2023 EU State of the Union address on Sept. 13.

In introducing the topic of AI, von der Leyen invoked an open letter sent by members of the global AI community calling for increased regulatory scrutiny of the potential for extinction from AI.

Per von der Leyens speech:

The president called for the assemblage of a new global framework for AI, built on three pillars: guardrails, governance and guiding innovation.

In describing the necessary guardrails, the president invoked the EUs AI Act, calling it a blueprint for the whole world. For the governance pillar, von der Leyen beseeched the global community to form a governance council similar to the International Panel on Climate Change.

Related: Bitcoin is on a collision course with Net Zero promises

Lastly, in support of the tenant of guiding innovation, President von der Leyen announced an EU-wide initiative to accelerate access to Europes supercomputers for artificial intelligence startups wishing to train models and conduct research.

Europe has now become a leader in supercomputing with 3 of the 5 most powerful supercomputers in the world, the president said, adding, We need to capitalise on this.

President von der Leyen also lauded U.S. technology companies that have chosen to voluntarily adopt AI standards and ethics and praised EU companies that have done the same. Now, the president added, we should bring all of this work together towards minimum global standards for safe and ethical use of AI.

View original post here:

EU announces initiative to fast-track supercomputer access for AI ... - Cointelegraph

Read More..

SPARACIO | Free Speech At Cornell: A Virtuous Theme for the Year – Cornell University The Cornell Daily Sun

In American life, it seems that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction: intellectualism and rising anti-intellectualism, eight years of Barack Obama and the election of Donald Trump, large advances in civil rights and the retraction of those rights (e.g., Dobbs v. Jackson). But no neat system of binaries would stand without eventual collapse when faced with a topic like free speech. Society shifts with the demarcations of history and our current reality is the result of many interconnected political and sociocultural factors.

People coming from nearly all positions of the political spectrum can seem to become exercised over free speech issues. Within the past year, the following types of incidents have thus occurred: the heckling of conservative speakers, debates over trigger warnings, debates over course content (and the expanding canon), student discomfort with specific topics, self-censorship, cancel culture and what some decry as a lack of viewpoint diversity on campuses. Considering that any situation that involves free speech is highly specific, each incident has a unique context and is a unique combination of the phenomena listed above.

Free speech is a topic that has political, legal, social and cultural implications. In addition, pressures to censor at least some kinds of speech are present across the political spectrum. On the right, there is concern about teaching critical race theory, and on the left, there is concern about bringing conservative speakers to campus and calls to issue trigger warnings in the classroom.

At Stanford Law School, a federal appeals court judge was heckled by students after trying to speak. At Pennsylvania State University, President Neeli Bendapudi released a video explaining the obligation to host speakers that hold views that many find egregious. Within the last two years, speakers with conservative views have been disrupted at Yale Law School, the University of California Hastings College of Law and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

At Cornell, when conservative media pundit and author Ann Coulter 84 came to speak on campus, students disrupted her in an organized effort to prevent her from speaking. (The incident at Cornell was similar to the one at Stanford, where a speaker with harmful views was invited to speak on campus and subsequently heckled by student protestors.) Last April, the Student Assembly attempted to pass Resolution 31, a bill that tried to mandate trigger warnings in the classroom. In response President Martha Pollack immediately issued a statement condemning the resolution. Cornell made national news and Free Expression was announced the theme of the 2023-24 school year.

During this polarized time it can feel impossible to know what to do or what to say. As a student in the humanities, Ive watched professors debate out loud to themselves about whether or not they should issue a trigger warning. Professors also consider the sociocultural implications of the material they teach more so than in the past, particularly with student discomfort on the rise. The suggestion that trigger warnings be mandated so as to prevent discomfort is not the answer to this confusion. Mandating trigger warnings denies the complexity of the classroom and can infantilize and impose vulnerabilities where they do not lie.

What scares me the most are the ways that students avoid having thoughtful and respectful discussions with one another, particularly when that discourse is political. On campus, self-censorship is reported by students on the political right and left. On a broader campus level, there is a good degree of self-censorship, Avery Bower 23, President of Cornell Republicans, told me last spring. He reflects a sentiment felt by many conservatives on college campuses where there is a liberal majority.

When I spoke to a progressive member of Cornell Political Union (a bipartisan political debate club) they told me: I think certain groups on campus make it really difficult to voice what you want to voice without pushback. I think it is harder for Republicans to speak out because we have such a liberal campus. In spaces like CPU, it was really difficult for people really far on the left to kind of speak about their political ideology to the truest sense because you have a lot of conservatives who think that free speech is so threatened.

Javed Jokhai 24, president of Cornell Democrats, conveyed the detrimental effects of this culture stating, we touch upon topics where we dont know how to communicate with each other in a way that feels authentic, sensitive, and honest. These sentiments illuminate a culture where students are unable to express their opinions in such a way that maintains respect for themselves and others.

The issue of free speech inspires us to refocus on the goal of education. When I spoke to Provost Michael Kotlikoff, he expressed that the whole point of an education is to be disruptive. An education is supposed to challenge previously held views, promote intellectual exchange and teach one how to strengthen and defend views against criticism. To protect, honor and cherish an education that disrupts we must protect free speech and academic freedom on campus this school year and face the discomfort that studenthood entails.

Rebecca Sparacio is a senior in The College of Arts & Sciences. Her fortnightly column The Space Between is a discussion on student life, politics and community. She can be reached at [emailprotected].

The Cornell Daily Sun is interested in publishing a broad and diverse set of content from the Cornell and greater Ithaca community. We want to hear what you have to say about this topic or any of our pieces. Here are some guidelines on how to submit. And heres our email: [emailprotected].

Read the original post:
SPARACIO | Free Speech At Cornell: A Virtuous Theme for the Year - Cornell University The Cornell Daily Sun

Read More..

Laura Hollis: The ‘narrative’ is killing us | Opinion – Milton Daily Standard

The truth has been politicized in America, and this is absolutely a war against the public good. Something is either true or it isnt, and whether that truth helps or hurts someone politically (or any other way) should play no part in the decision to make accurate information available to the public.

Im not naive enough to expect politicians or corporate bigwigs to routinely fall on their swords exposing fraud or falsehood in their ranks (though some honorable people certainly do); greed and lust for power have been around as long as there have been human beings.

But there was a time when the pursuit of truth was an express aspiration of journalism. Today, however, too many so-called journalists have been educated to see themselves as activists warriors for a variety of causes with a duty to color, ignore or even hide the truth if doing so helps advance a desired objective, like cleansing the human race of all social ills, saving the planet or getting their preferred candidate into a position of power.

The story that the public hears instead of the truth is called the narrative. And the narratives are killing us. Literally.

Ann Coulters recent column is a perfect example. Titled Apparently, Not All Black Lives Matter, Coulter cited FBI crime statistics showing not only that most murders in the United States are committed by Blacks, but that most victims of those murders are other Blacks. She excoriated the Biden administration and Democrats, as well as the media, for their hypocrisy and racial hatemongering. The real facts and statistics dont make the news because they run counter to the narrative that white supremacy is the biggest threat to the nations peace and security. Focusing on the false flag of white supremacy means that attention and resources are diverted away from the causes of so many deaths in Americas Black community. This is inexcusable.

Homelessness is another example. The narrative around homelessness includes the position that involuntary commitment of the seriously mentally ill is not compassionate; that poverty can be remediated with taxation and wealth redistribution; that drug abuse can be contained by decriminalization or sanction-free, subsidized injection zones, and that living in the streets is somehow a constitutional right, or a matter of dignity.

The truth is much uglier. In Los Angeles County, for example, the number of homeless people has been exploding year after year. In 2013, L.A. County had 39,000 homeless. In 2014, it was 44,000. Los Angeles County now has more than 75,000 homeless, and that number is an increase of nearly 10% from last year. Homeless encampments are riddled with disease and crime, and cities like San Francisco, Portland, Oregon, and Seattle are facing the departure of residents and businesses fed up with violence and ever-present human waste.

How many lives have been destroyed or lost because of a slavish adherence to a narrative and the refusal to face reality?

The same can be said of decisions to reduce the penalties for shoplifting, as California did via Proposition 47 in 2014. The narrative was that prosecuting shoplifting as a felony contributed to prison overcrowding and disproportionately affected minorities. The reality is that retail theft in California (and elsewhere) has now become brazen and even more widespread, creating huge and often unsustainable losses for businesses. (Total retail theft in the U.S. in 2021 has been estimated at $100 billion.) Businesses are closing and leaving areas rife with theft.

The narrative around unfettered immigration is also closely tied to compassion and combating racism. And the Biden administration loves to claim that our borders are secure. In fact, the doors are being held securely open. And open borders mean increased crime. In 2021, the first year of Joe Bidens presidency, the number of crimes committed by illegal immigrants increased 400%. Cartels traffic children and women in the illegal sex trade, and ever-more lethal drugs, especially fentanyl. Overdoses in the U.S. attributable to fentanyl increased almost 300% in just five years, from 6 of every 100,000 deaths to 22 in every 100,000 deaths.

And then theres the COVID-19 pandemic, where the narrative was that anyone concerned about the safety of the vaccines, or pointing out the truth that masks do nothing to prevent the spread of the virus, or opposing lockdowns was going to kill people. Those who were inclined to try pharmaceutical treatments like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine instead of multiple shots were painted as knuckle-dragging cretins eating horse paste. But the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis were real, as were the concerns about masking children and closing schools.

An enemy of the truth is an enemy of the people. That goes double for those whose job descriptions should include relentless pursuit of the truth and informing the public of that truth. In this climate, those who are willing to investigate, ask hard questions and hold powerful and popular peoples feet to the fire, regardless of their political viewpoints or stated aspirations to save the world, deserve our thanks. Their job is even more difficult than it used to be.

But the rest of you? You should be ashamed of yourselves.

To find out more about Laura Hollis and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at http://www.creators.com.

See original here:
Laura Hollis: The 'narrative' is killing us | Opinion - Milton Daily Standard

Read More..

SSV.network hits mainnet to increase decentralization of Ethereum … – Cointelegraph

Criticisms aimed at the perceived centralization of Ether (ETH) staking pools may finally be quelled by an alternative staking infrastructure that aims to improve private key security and reduce validator downtimes and slashing penalties.

Speaking exclusively to Cointelegraph, SSV.network founder Alon Muroch outlined how the platformsdistributed validator technology (DVT), developed in partnership with the Ethereum Foundation, can help decentralize ETH staking pools and validators.

SSV.networklaunched its public mainnet with more than 10 staking decentralized applications deploying their platforms on the network on Sept. 14.DVT is intended to decentralize the current landscape of staking providers, which is currently dominated by a handful of ETH staking pools that command a significant share of ETH locked in the Eth2 staking contract.

Related:SSV launches $50M ecosystem fund to support ETH staking tech

According to Muroch, the technology is an approach to validator security that spreads out key management and signing responsibilities across multiple parties, reducing single points of failure and increasing validator resiliency.

The technology splits a private key used to secure a validator across a cluster of computers. This increases security and allows for some nodes of a validator cluster to go offline, which also reduces single points of failure from the network and makes validator sets more robust.

Data from blockchain analytics firm Nansen shows that Lido Finance accounts for 32% of ETH locked in the Beacon Chain deposit contract. ETH staking pools offered by Coinbase (8%) and Binance (4%) also command a significant share of staked ETH.

As SVV noted in an announcement marking the mainnet launch, centralized exchanges such as Coinbase, Binance and Kraken hold around 18% of the total staked ETH, while liquid-taking pools like Lido, RocketPool, Stader and Stakewise account for over 36% of the total market share.

Liquid staking pools became hugely popular in the build-up to Ethereums anticipated Shanghai upgrade in July 2023. The event introduced the ability for Ethereum users to withdraw staked ETH from the Beacon contract for the first time.

SSV intends to offer alternative liquid and centralized staking pools, which it describes as fundamentally centralized and custodial. Muroch added that SSV can significantly increase validator private key security and maximize rewards through high performance and a fault-tolerant setup that stops slashing penalties for offline validators.

SSV.network grabbed headlines inJanuary 2023when it launched a $50 million ecosystem fund to support other projects developing using DVT. The technology was previously highlighted as an important aspect of Ethereums scaling roadmap laid out by co-founder Vitalik Buterin in December 2021.

Magazine:Are DAOs overhyped and unworkable? Lessons from the front lines

Read more:

SSV.network hits mainnet to increase decentralization of Ethereum ... - Cointelegraph

Read More..

Australian gov’t urged to fund decentralization measures – Xinhua

CANBERRA, Sept. 15 (Xinhua) -- A leading think tank has called for the Australian government to increase regional investment to help spread out the country's population.

The Regional Australia Institute (RAI), a Canberra-based independent think tank founded in 2011, has released a 10-year plan to boost the proportion of the Australian population living in regional areas.

Under the plan - titled A Framework to Rebalance the Nation - the RAI calls for greater investment from the government to build workforces in regional areas, and make rural towns more liveable with upgraded infrastructure to better spread Australia's population out across the country.

According to RAI data, more than three million Australians are eager to move out of urban areas, but recruiting for positions in regional Australia is growing harder.

It found that 77 percent of employers recruiting in regional Australia reported difficulty filling advertised roles in 2022 - up from 37 percent in 2019.

The institute identified housing availability as a major hindrance for people looking to move away from cities.

The RAI plan aims to increase the number of people living prosperously in Australia's regions from 9.6 million currently - approximately 36 percent of the population - to 11 million by 2032.

Read this article:

Australian gov't urged to fund decentralization measures - Xinhua

Read More..