Page 77«..1020..76777879..90100..»

Quokka: ‘World’s first’ quantum computing consumer product is here – Interesting Engineering

Researchers from the Centre for Quantum Software and Information (QSI) developed an affordable, handy personal quantum computer emulator. It can run programming languages written for quantum computing and produce great results.

Presales for this product have already started happening, with shipments due in July. Co-founded by Simon Devitt and Chris Ferrie, the duo tends to make quantum computing understandable and accessible to everyone.

The researchers are geared up to democratize access to the existing and rapidly growing field of quantum computing called Eigensystem. They aim to do this by levelling up the next generation of scientists, engineers, and innovators using the mode of education.

Quantum computers and quantum technology disrupt industries and promise a significant paradigm shift. One of its benefits is that it can solve complex problems in the blink of an eye. It can also support non-linear problems and can handle huge rises in the amounts of data.

Apart from this, quantum technology can also help with gauging machine learning, drug development, modeling chemical processes, finance, aircraft development, and lots more. It can also help in the world of research, however, its important to know who it is for. In the words of Ferrie, Quantum technology has had limited engagement beyond the rarefied world of research and that means we need to reimagine what quantum education is and who its for.

The duo is just aiming to revolutionize how people learn about quantum computing and STEM education in general. However, STEM technology still runs on a pretty archaic curriculum and is mostly driven by information processing. Quantum is poised to change that.

The researchers hold the opinion that quantum literacy is likely to define the cutting edge of 21st-century innovation. However, the problem is that there isnt a platform where students, educators and hobbyists could properly discover the possibilities.

The Quokka allows users to explore the practical applications of quantum computing, providing hands-on and tactile experiences with cutting-edge technology, said Ferrie. It emulates a 30-qubit fault-tolerant quantum computer, which doesnt exist yet.

The Quokka platform, including the device, is a tool for hands-on learning. It acts as a fault-tolerant quantum computer, unlike other quantum simulators, he said.

It allows you to experiment and learn about quantum algorithms and programs by interfacing with it exactly as you would have to with a future fault-tolerant quantum computer he added.

The Quokka has been created with an objective of generating a dynamic learning ecosystem for students and professionals. The basic tier of the platform comprises three programming interfaces. At the advanced level is a comprehensive library of content with access to lessons, tutorials, curated community projects, and the ability to share, mix, and co-create projects.

Then theres Quokka Stories, a collection of narrative-driven lessons targeting the educational curriculum, reimagining science, technology, engineering and mathematics through the lens of information processing Ferrie shared.

The duo are devising ways to revolutionize peoples learning about quantum computing and STEM education. They believed their product would be affordable and accessible to a wide range of users, like schools, professionals and enthusiasts.

NEWSLETTER

Stay up-to-date on engineering, tech, space, and science news with The Blueprint.

Gairika Mitra Gairika is a technology nerd, an introvert, and an avid reader. Lock her up in a room full of books, and you'll never hear her complain.

More:
Quokka: 'World's first' quantum computing consumer product is here - Interesting Engineering

Read More..

Quantum Machines Opens Quantum and HPC Facility in Tel Aviv – HPCwire

TEL AVIV, Israel, June 26, 2024 Quantum Machines (QM), a leading provider of processor-based quantum controllers, announced the opening of the Israeli Quantum Computing Center (IQCC), a world-class research facility that will serve the quantum computing industry and academic community in Israel and around the world. The center was built with the financial backing and support of the Israel Innovation Authority and is located at Tel Aviv University.

The IQCCs grand opening took place June 24th, as part of Tel Aviv Universitys AI and Cyber Week. The ceremony began with the ribbon-cutting, followed by speeches from Asaf Zamir, First Deputy Mayor of Tel Aviv; Dror Bin, CEO of the Israel Innovation Authority; Prof. Yaron Oz and Prof. Itzik Ben Israel from Tel Aviv University; and Dr. Itamar Sivan, CEO of Quantum Machines. Industry experts, including Eyal Waldman, co-founder and former CEO of Mellanox, Ofir Zamir, Senior Director of AI Solution Architecture at NVIDIA, and Niv Efron, Senior Director of Engineering at Google, also shared their insights.

The Israeli Quantum Computing Center marks a significant milestone for our tech sector, said Dror Bin, CEO of the Israel Innovation Authority. It exemplifies the remarkable progress of Israels quantum computing ecosystem and will serve as a center of excellence not just locally, but on a global scale. Were proud to support this initiative that solidifies Israels position in the quantum computing race.

The Israeli Quantum Computing Center represents more than technological advancement; its a testament to our duty to pursue the biggest computing revolution since the invention of the computer itself, said Dr. Itamar Sivan, co-founder and CEO of Quantum Machines. By leveraging our excellent talent and global partnerships, we aim to have an impact that goes beyond progress in quantum computing laying the foundation for Israels long-term leadership and sovereignty in this critical field.

The IQCC is a state-of-the-art quantum and HPC center that uniquely integrates the power of quantum and classical computing resources. It is the first in the world to house multiple co-located quantum computers of different qubit types, all utilizing the NVIDIA DGX Quantum system. This offers on-premises supercomputing resources and cloud accessibility, while being tightly integrated with Quantum Machines processor-based OPX control system. The center also features the worlds best-equipped testbed for developing new quantum computing technologies.

The unified DGX Quantum system for integrated quantum supercomputing was co-developed by NVIDIA and Quantum Machines. DGX Quantum implements NVIDIA CUDA-Q, an open-source software platform for integrated quantum-classical computing. The system features a supercomputing cluster headlined by NVIDIA Grace Hopper superchips and also including NVIDIA DGX H100, all connected to AWS cloud platforms for remote access and to leverage additional cloud computing resources. The center also utilizes QMs new OPX1000 controller, designed to enable scaling to 1,000+ qubits.

The tight integration of quantum computers with AI supercomputers is essential to the development of useful quantum computing, said Tim Costa, Director of Quantum and HPC at NVIDIA. This work with Quantum Machines to enable a flagship deployment of NVIDIA DGX Quantum in the IQCC offers researchers the platform they need to grow quantum computing into the era of large-scale, useful applications

Before the IQCC, a developer of a quantum processor chip would need to build their own testing setup, costing millions, said Dr. Yonatan Cohen, CTO and co-founder of Quantum Machines. Now, researchers can plug their chip into our testbed and benefit from the most advanced setup in the world, leveraging NVIDIA and Quantum Machines hardware to accelerate their development process and reduce costs significantly.

The IQCC is open to researchers and developers of quantum computers from around the world. By providing an open, cutting-edge platform for research and development, Quantum Machines aims to accelerate the progress of practical quantum computing and foster collaborative projects with industry leaders that will drive the field forward. The center is poised to become a destination for companies and researchers worldwide, securing Israels quantum independence and cementing its position as a leader in the quantum computing revolution.

For more information about the IQCC please visit https://i-qcc.com.

About Quantum Machines

Quantum Machines (QM) drives quantum breakthroughs that accelerate the realization of practical quantum computers. The companys Quantum Orchestration Platform (QOP) fundamentally redefines the control and operations architecture of quantum processors. The full-stack hardware and software platform is capable of running even the most complex algorithms right out of the box, including quantum error correction, multi-qubit calibration, and more. Helping achieve the full potential of any quantum processor, the QOP allows for unprecedented advancement and speed-up of quantum technologies as well as the ability to scale to thousands of qubits.

Source: Quantum Machines

View original post here:
Quantum Machines Opens Quantum and HPC Facility in Tel Aviv - HPCwire

Read More..

University of Gondar Scientists Say Quantum Computers Offer Promising Boost to Alzheimer’s Diagnosis – The Quantum Insider

Insider Brief

A team of scientists said an innovative ensemble deep learning model combined with quantum machine learning classifiers might improve the accuracy and efficiency of Alzheimers disease (AD) classification, according to a study published in Nature.

The researchers, from the University of Gondar in Ethiopia, used the classifiers to investigate Alzheimers disease, a chronic neurodegenerative disorder. Early diagnosis is crucial for timely intervention and treatment, potentially improving the quality of life for those affected. Traditional methods for diagnosing Alzheimers have limitations in accuracy and efficiency, prompting researchers to explore advanced technologies, such as quantum computing.

Quantum Computing and Deep Learning

Quantum computing offers a promising alternative to classical machine learning approaches for various disease classification tasks. Quantum computers, while still under development, can theoretically process complex data and perform calculations at a much faster rate, leveraging quantums unique potential to handle large datasets more efficiently and accurately.

The team leveraged this potential by developing a model that integrates deep learning architectures and quantum machine learning algorithms. This hybrid approach aims to enhance the precision and speed of Alzheimers diagnosis.

The study used data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative I (ADNI1) and Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative II (ADNI2) datasets. These datasets, comprising MRI brain images, were merged and pre-processed to form the basis of the proposed model. Key features were extracted using a customized version of VGG16 and ResNet50 models. These features were then fed into a Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) classifier to categorize the data into four stages: non-demented, very mild demented, mild demented, and moderate demented.

The ensemble deep learning model combined the strengths of both VGG16 and ResNet50 architectures, deep learning architectures used for image recognition tasks. VGG16 is known for its simplicity and deep convolutional layers, while ResNet50 introduces residual connections to allow for training of very deep networks without performance degradation. The QSVM classifier provided the computational power of quantum algorithms. This combination aimed to enhance the overall performance of the classification model.

Evaluation and Results

The performance of the proposed model was evaluated using six metrics: accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), F1-score, precision and recall. The results demonstrated that the ensemble model significantly outperformed several state-of-the-art methods in detecting Alzheimers disease.

These results lean toward the superiority of the ensemble model with QSVM in accurately classifying AD stages from the merged ADNI dataset. Its important to note that the ResNet + QSVM model exhibited a 6% improvement in accuracy compared to the standalone ResNet model, while the proposed ensemble model showed 8.5% and 12.21% better results compared to other ensemble and SVM models, respectively.

The experiments were conducted using a Hewlett Packard Core i5, sixth-generation computer with 8 GB RAM, and a Google Colab Pro GPU.On the quantum side, the researchers relied on a 5-qubit quantum hardware or simulator, employing the QSVM model from the Qiskit library. This setup allowed for efficient processing and analysis of the MRI brain images, demonstrating the practical application of quantum computing in medical research.

Implications and Future Research

The study highlights the potential of combining quantum classifiers and ensemble learning to achieve effective outcomes in disease classification tasks. The integration of quantum machine learning classifiers with deep learning architectures can significantly improve the accuracy and efficiency of Alzheimers disease diagnosis.

However, the researchers acknowledge the need for further studies to evaluate the practical implementation of this model within medical devices. Future research could focus on integrating the proposed model into real-world medical settings, providing a significant solution to support primary care for Alzheimers disease, especially in cases where MRI scans are blurred or challenging to interpret.

The researchers include: researchers Abebech Jenber Belay, Yelkal Mulualem and elaku Bitew Haile, all of the department of Information Technology, College of Informatics, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Read this article:
University of Gondar Scientists Say Quantum Computers Offer Promising Boost to Alzheimer's Diagnosis - The Quantum Insider

Read More..

NASA appears to step back from the term ‘artificial general intelligence’ – FedScoop

The terminology NASA once used to refer to artificial general intelligence has changed, the space agency said in response to questions from FedScoop about emails obtained through a public records request, signaling the ways that science-focused federal agencies might be discussing emerging technologies in the age of generative AI.

Building artificial general intelligence a powerful form of AI that could theoretically rival humans is still a distant goal, but remains a key objective of companies like OpenAI and Meta. Its also a topic that remains hotly contested and controversial among technology researchers and civil society, and one that some feel could end up distracting from more immediate AI risks, like bias, privacy, and cybersecurity.

NASA is one of the few government agencies thats expressed any particular interest in AGI issues. Many federal agencies remain focused on more immediate applications of AI, such as using machine learning to process documents. Jennifer Dooren, NASAs deputy news chief, said in a statement to FedScoop that the agency is committed to formalizing protocols and processes for AI usage and expanding efforts to further AI innovations across the agency.

A framework for the ethical use of artificial intelligence published by the space agency in April 2021 made reference to both artificial general intelligence and artificial super intelligence. In response to FedScoop questions about the status of this work, NASA said the terminology of AI has changed, pointing to the agencys handling of generative artificial intelligence, which typically includes the kind of large language models that fuel systems like ChatGPT. (Whether systems like ChatGPT eventually serve as a foundation for AGI remains up for debate among researchers.)

NASA is looking holistically at Artificial Intelligence and not just the subparts, Dooren said. The terms from this past framework have evolved. For example, the terms AGI and ASI could now be viewed as generative AI (genAI) today.

The agency also highlighted a new working group focused on ethical artificial intelligence and NASAs work to meet goals outlined in President Joe Bidens AI executive order from last October. The space agency also hosted a public town hall on its AI capabilities last month.

But the apparent retreat from the term artificial general intelligence is notable, given some of the futuristic concerns outlined in the 2021 framework. One goal outlined in the document, for instance, was to set the stage for successful, peaceful, and potentially symbiotic coexistence between humans and machines. The framework noted that while AGI had not yet been achieved, there was growing belief that there could be a tipping point in AI capabilities that would fundamentally change how humans interact with technology.

Experts sometimes split artificial intelligence into several categories: artificial narrow intelligence, or AI use cases designed with specific applications in mind, and artificial general intelligence, referring to AI systems that could match capabilities of human users. NASAs framework also refers to artificial super intelligence, which would represent AI capabilities that surpass human capabilities.

The document stipulated that NASA should be an early adopter of national and global best practices in regard to these advanced technologies. It noted that many AI systems wont advance to the level of AGI or ASI, but still encouraged NASA to consider the potential impacts of these technologies. Many of the considerations outlined in the report appear to be far off, but range from analyzing the possibility of encoding morality in advanced AI systems (a potentially impossible task) or merging astronauts with artificial intelligence.

Creating a perfect moral code that works in all cases is still an elusive task and must be pursued by NASA experts in conjunction with other national or global experts, the document stated. As humans pursue long term space flight, technology may advance to a point where it would be necessary to consider the benefits and impacts of melding humans and AI machines, most notably adaptations that allow survivability during long duration space flight, but challenges if returning to Earth.

NASAs interest in studying the ramifications of AGI, as part of this framework, were also discussed in an email obtained by FedScoop earlier this year.

Read more:

NASA appears to step back from the term 'artificial general intelligence' - FedScoop

Read More..

SoftBank chief: Forget AGI, ASI will be here within 10 years – AI News

SoftBank founder and CEO Masayoshi Son has claimed that artificial super intelligence (ASI) could be a reality within the next decade.

Speaking at SoftBanks annual meeting in Tokyo on June 21, Son painted a picture of a future where AI far surpasses human intelligence, potentially revolutionising life as we know it. Son asserted that by 2030, AI could be one to 10 times smarter than humans, and by 2035, it might reach a staggering 10,000 times smarter than human intelligence.

SoftBanks CEO made a clear distinction between artificial general intelligence (AGI) and ASI. According to Son, AGI would be equivalent to a human genius, potentially up to 10 times more capable than an average person. ASI, however, would be in a league of its own, with capabilities 10,000 times beyond human potential.

Sons predictions align with the goals of Safe Superintelligence Inc. (SSI), founded by Ilya Sutskever, former chief scientist at OpenAI, along with Daniel Levy and Daniel Gross. SSIs mission, as stated on their website, is to approach safety and capabilities in tandem, as technical problems to be solved through revolutionary engineering and scientific breakthroughs.

The timing of these announcements underscores the growing focus on superintelligent AI within the tech industry. While SoftBank appears to be prioritising the development of ASI, SSI is emphasising the importance of safety in this pursuit. As stated by SSIs founders, We plan to advance capabilities as fast as possible while making sure our safety always remains ahead.

Its worth noting that the scientific community has yet to reach a consensus on the feasibility or capabilities of AGI or ASI. Current AI systems, while impressive in specific domains, are still far from achieving human-level reasoning across all areas.

Sons speech took an unexpectedly personal turn when he linked the development of ASI to his own sense of purpose and mortality. SoftBank was founded for what purpose? For what purpose was Masayoshi Son born? It may sound strange, but I think I was born to realise ASI. I am super serious about it, he declared.

Sons predictions and SoftBanks apparent pivot towards ASI development, coupled with the formation of SSI, raise important questions about the future of AI and its potential impact on society. While the promise of superintelligent AI is enticing, it also brings concerns about job displacement, ethical considerations, and the potential risks associated with creating an intelligence that far surpasses our own.

Whether Sons vision of ASI within a decade proves prescient or overly optimistic remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the race towards superintelligent AI is heating up, with major players positioning themselves at the forefront.

See also: Anthropics Claude 3.5 Sonnet beats GPT-4o in most benchmarks

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.

Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.

Tags: agi, ai, artificial intelligence, asi, development, ethics, masayoshi son, Society, softbank, ssi, super intelligence

Go here to read the rest:

SoftBank chief: Forget AGI, ASI will be here within 10 years - AI News

Read More..

$10000 AI-generated, 3D-printed liquid nitrogen container tested supercools CPUs up to 3 times faster than … – Tom’s Hardware

Skatterbencher and three industry-leading partners have completed a feasibility study to see if its possible to build a liquid nitrogen (LN2) container using generative AI and additive manufacturing techniques, also known as 3D printing. In a blog post and YouTube video, the partners show that its possible, but perhaps not financially wise, for the benefits obtained.

Pieter of Skatterbencher is an expert in overclocking and teamed up with three industry-leading companies to explore the possibilities of AI and 3D printing for LN2 cooling. These included Diabatix, a Belgian company pioneering the use of generative AI in thermal solutions, and 3D Systems, an expert in additive manufacturing. Rounding out the partnership was ElmorLabs, a well-known name in overclocking.

The project used the ElmorLabs Volcano CPU LN2 container as a reference design. It tasked Diabatixs ColdStream Next AI platform with designing a new LN2 container to improve the reference design. Once the design was complete, the team sent it to 3D Systems to produce a prototype using oxygen-free copper powder.

The prototype's design and manufacture cost $10,000. In comparison, the ElmorLabs Volcano CPU LN2 container used as a reference design sells for just $260.

The base performance tests compared the AI-designed LN2 container with the ElmorLabs Volcano in three categories:

In testing, the AI-generated LN2 container blew away the Volcano in the cool-down test. It reached -194 Celsius in just under 56 seconds. The Volcano took almost three minutes three times as long as the prototype. The heat-up test also went in the AI designs favor, but not as dramatically. The container heated to 20 Celsius 1.2 times faster than the Volcano, more than 30 seconds faster.

Finally, the AI-designed LN2 container proved 20% more efficient than the ElmorLabs design. Using 500mL of liquid nitrogen, the Volcano cooled down to just -100 Celsius, while the AI-designed prototype went down to -133 Celsius.

Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Those tests dont reflect practical considerations, so the team also conducted further tests of a more practical nature:

The team found that while the AI-designed container did beat the ElmorLabs Volcano in real-world tests, the improvements were not nearly as pronounced. Given the dramatic price difference between the AI design and the existing product, the AI design is not a cost-effective alternative.

With the initial testing out of the way, SkatterBencher and its partners may look into performance and cost optimizations and perhaps change the intended use to be for even higher-power CPUs, like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper. The team would also like to commercialize the design but likely has a fair bit of work ahead of it to make it commercially viable.

Read more here:

$10000 AI-generated, 3D-printed liquid nitrogen container tested supercools CPUs up to 3 times faster than ... - Tom's Hardware

Read More..

Zuckerberg disses closed-source AI competitors as trying to ‘create God’ – TechCrunch

Riffing on what he sees for the future of AI, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in an interview published Thursday that he deeply believes that there will not be just one AI. Touting the value of open source to put AI tools into many peoples hands, Zuckerberg took a moment to disparage the efforts of unnamed competitors who he sees as less than open, adding that they seem to think theyre creating God.

I dont think that AI technology is a thing that should be kind of hoarded and that one company gets to use it to build whatever central, single product that theyre building, Zuckerberg said in a new YouTube interview with Kane Sutter (@Kallaway).

I find it a pretty big turnoff when people in the tech industry talk about building this one true AI, he continued. Its almost as if they kind of think theyre creating God or something and its just thats not what were doing, he said. I dont think thats how this plays out.

I get why, if youre in some AI lab you want to feel like what youre doing is super important, right? Its like, Were building the one true thing for the future. But I just think, like, realistically, thats not how stuff works, right? Zuckerberg explained. Its not like there was one app on peoples phones that people use. Theres not one creator that people want all their content from. Theres not one business that people want to buy everything from.

In the conversation, Zuckerberg said there needs to be a lot of different AIs that get created to reflect peoples different interests. The company also on Thursday announced early tests of its AI Studio software in the U.S. that will allow creators and others to build AI avatars that will be able to reach people through Instagrams messaging system. The AIs will be able to answer questions from their followers and chat with people in a fun way but will be labeled as AI to not cause confusion.

When referring to companies that build closed AI platforms, the Meta CEO said he didnt believe this is how to create the best experiences for people.

You want to unlock and unleash as many people as possible trying out different things, he continued. I mean, thats what culture is, right? Its not like one group of people getting to dictate everything for people.

His comments feel a bit like sour grapes, as they arrive shortly after reports emerged that Meta had tried to negotiate with Apple to integrate its AIs into Apples operating systems, instead of only working with OpenAI at launch, but got shot down. According to Bloomberg, Apple decided to not move forward with formal discussions with Meta because it didnt believe its privacy practices were strong enough.

Without a deal, Meta loses access to potentially billions of iPhone users worldwide. But it appears that Metas plan B is to build technology that expands beyond the smartphone.

In the interview, Zuckerberg touched on the progress the company is seeing with the Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, for example, saying that its path would one day converge with the work being done now on full holographic displays. However, the former will have more appeal in the near term, he said.

I actually think you can create a great experience with cameras, and a microphone, and speakers and the ability to do multimodal AI, even before you have any kind of display on these glasses, he noted. Plus, not having a display keeps the costs down. Metas smart glasses are around $300, and the Meta Quest Pro is $1,000, for comparison.

Zuckerberg said there will be three different products ahead of convergence: display-less smart glasses, a heads-up type of display and full holographic displays. Eventually, he said that instead of neural interfaces connected to their brain, people might one day wear a wristband that picks up signals from the brain communicating with their hand. This would allow them to communicate with the neural interface by barely moving their hand. Over time, it could allow people to type, too.

Zuckerberg cautioned that these types of inputs and AI experiences may not immediately replace smartphones, though. I dont think, in the history of technology, the new platform it usually doesnt completely make it that people stop using the old thing. Its just that you use it less, he said.

For instance, people now use smartphones to do things they may have done on their computers 10 to 15 years ago.

I think thats gonna happen with glasses, too, he said. Its not like were going to stop having a phone. Its just that its going to stay in your pocket, and youll take it out when you really need to do stuff with it. But more and more, I think people will just start saying, Hey, I can take this photo with my glasses. I can ask this question to AI, or I can send someone a message its just a lot easier with glasses, Zuckerberg said.

I wouldnt be surprised if 10 years from now, well probably still have phones, but its probably going to be much more intentional in usage as opposed to just reflexively reaching for it and grabbing it for any technological thing that you want to do, he said.

The rest is here:

Zuckerberg disses closed-source AI competitors as trying to 'create God' - TechCrunch

Read More..

Meta Will Enable Influencers To Create AI Versions of Themselves – Social Media Today

Its been in development for a while, and today, Metas launching the first stage of its AI Studio platform, which will enable creators on Instagram to build AI versions of themselves that can interact with fans via DM.

As you can see in this example, Meta's custom AI bots, currently in beta, and in limited testing with selected creators, will be able to answer questions in the style of that account.

The AI bot will have a stars icon on the message tab, signalling that this is a bot response stream, while there are also disclaimer notes in the chat, explaining that it's an AI bot that you're engaging with.

So it *should* be clear to all that you're not talking to the actual person or account holder. But then again...

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg made the announcement during an interview with YouTuber Kane Sutter, in which he also discussed various elements of Metas broader AI plans.

Most of Zucks comments are fairly vague and broad-reaching, with a few indicators of its coming AI updates (improved translation, hologram-like projections of real people in VR).

But the main announcement is the launch of live testing of AI Studio with selected IG creators in the U.S.

Zuckerberg says that AI Studio will enable creators to build an AI agent version of themselves to interact with their community. The process, built into Instagram (which app researcher Alessandro Paluzzi uncovered recently), will provide various prompts and tools to generate these AI bot variations.

The main focus, or the simple use case, according to Zuckerberg, is to answer fact-based queries, with the more challenging element coming in answers that are more creative, and replicate the style of the creator. Zuckerberg says that creators will have the freedom to train their bots on different aspects of their social media presence, and through this, that should enable them to generate more life-like replicas of themselves.

Yet, as noted, Meta also doesnt want to trick people into thinking theyre engaging with the real person. Zuckerberg noted that they're still working on the AI disclosure elements, but there are various signifiers in-stream.

But the bigger question that I have is Why? Why would people want to engage with a bot that sounds like a person of profile, when they're not actually engaging with a human at all?

I mean, I get the basic use case, in regards to creators getting a heap of queries, and only having so much time to personally respond. This is the fact-based element, where the bots will be able to provide, essentially, generic answers to common questions, in the style of the creator. But expanding into other areas seems inherently deceptive, and also, counter to the entire focus of social media platforms.

Right?

Sutter posed the same question in his interview with Zuckerberg, noting that there will be some trepidation, from creators and their audiences, about eroding that real connection within the medium. Zuckerberg played it down somewhat in his response, but really, there doesnt seem to be any real value in having AI bots that simulate actual humans, especially within apps that are geared around authentic connection.

It seems like a step away from the core use case of social, and into something else, a platform where bots end up engaging with bots, and real humans are sidelined in favor of automated engagement.

Havent users been complaining about bots for years? Hasnt inauthentic interaction always been a problem on social apps? But now we're not only encouraging it, but directly using it to replace humans.

Because the technology is better now, and more convincing? Is that the reason why people have always been annoyed by bots?

I dont know, it doesnt feel like the right way to lean into the AI trend, but Meta seems convinced that robot versions of celebrities and influencers will be a valuable add on, for some reason.

Zuckerberg also notes that, eventually, people will also be able to create UGC AI characters as well, that can interact with people in different ways and styles.

Though again, is there any actual demand for this? Will it add value?

Im not sure that Metas initial experiments with celebrity-influenced bots really caught on, but Metas pushing ahead, which will bring more endorsed bot engagement in-stream.

Continued here:

Meta Will Enable Influencers To Create AI Versions of Themselves - Social Media Today

Read More..

Microsoft’s Guide to using AI to become more Productive – Medium

Hey there, Im Devansh. I write for an audience of ~200K readers weekly. My goal is to help readers understand the most important ideas in AI and Tech from all important angles- social, economic, and technical. You can find my primary publication AI Made Simple over here, message me on LinkedIn, or reach out to me through any of my social media over here. I work as a consultant for clients looking to integrate AI in their lives- so please feel free to reach out if you think we can work together.

Teams everywhere are concerned about how to integrate AI into their workflows most effectively. If your organization has lots of money to burn, you could pay McKinsey consultants 400 USD/hour to create pretty slides based on recommendations from ChatGPT and spend 5 hours weekly in meetings to explore synergies and best practices. But for those of you without that luxury, one of the best resources is to look at the research done by the productivity teams at major companies. These companies have dedicated teams that interview their employees, study workflows, and extract insights from various internal and external experiments conducted on productivity.

Today, we will be looking at Microsofts excellent Microsoft New Future of Work Report 2023 to answer a key question- how can we leverage AI to make our work more productive? We will be studying the report brings to pull out interesting insights on-

1. How LLMs impact Information Work:

Task completion times for lab studies of Copilot for M365 (Cambon et al. 2023)

In a lab experiment, participants who scored poorly on their first writing task improved more when given access to ChatGPT than those with high scores on the initial task. Peng et al. (2023) also found suggestive evidence that GitHub Copilot was more helpful to developers with less experience. In an experiment with BCG employees completing a consulting task, the bottom- half of subjects in terms of skills benefited the most, showing a 43% improvement in performance, compared to the top half whose performance increased by 17%(DellAcqua et al. 2023).

I would take these results with a grain of salt, however. High-skill performers often do different things to their low-skilled counterparts, something that standardized tests are unable to measure. League 2 player Erling Haaland is a better footballer than me not just because he can beat me on performance-related tests, but also because he does 30 things that I dont. These 30 things are often much more difficult to measure. As we figure out how to use AI more effectively (and how to measure the results better), AI might actually increase the performance disparity between skilled and unskilled workers (most technology tends to reinforce differences, not reduce them). We already see some signs of this.

2. LLMs and Critical Thinking:

3. On Human-AI Collaboration:

4. LLMs for Team Collaboration and Communication:

5. Knowledge Management and Organizational Changes:

6. Implications for Future Work and Society:

Well spend the rest of this article discussing these ideas in more detail. Lets get right into it.

The following image summarizes the key themes very well-

Generative AI makes a clear, undeniable contribution to reducing the cognitive load from repetitive work, significantly improving experience- 68% of respondents agreed that Copilot actually improved quality of their workparticipants with access to Copilot found the task to be 58% less draining than participants without accessAmong enterprise Copilot users, 72% agreed that Copilot helped them spend less mental effort on mundane or repetitive tasks.

The impacts on quality are a bit more diverse. In a meeting summarization study, we see a slight reduction in performance, in the meeting summarization study where Copilot users took much less time, their summaries included 11.1 out of 15 specific pieces of information in the assessment rubric versus the 12.4 of 15 for users who did not have access to Copilot. This is not a super-significant difference but it definitely highlights the importance of having a human in the loop to audit the generation. In this sense, it seems like LLMs can be very helpful in creating a good first draft very quickly- leaving the refinement and improvements to the user (something 85% of the respondents agreed to).

On more domain-specific tasks, LLMs can introduce a very noob-friendly meta by raising the performance floor- In the other direction, the study of M365 Defender Security Copilot found security novices with Copilot were 44% more accurate in answering questions about the security incidents they examined. You can see something similar for yourself- with tools like DALLE that allow anyone to make good images. This is what leads to the impression that AI can help replace experts in their respective fields. For example, the usage of Github Copilot leads to a significantly better performance for programmers-

However, the reality is a lot more complicated. While such tools can be very helpful- they also introduce all kinds of unpredictable errors and vulnerabilities in systems. This is where Domain Expertise is key, since it will help you evaluate and modify the base output to your needs (the first draft concept shows up again). The most effective usage of LLMs often involves guiding it towards the correct answer. So for knowledge workers- it is crucial to know what to do. LLMs/Copilots can take care of the how.

Using AI for knowledge work always comes with the risk of overreliance and lax evaluations (we humans are prey to something called the automation bias, where we give undue weightage to any decision taken by an automated system). This is why a large part of my work involves building rigorous evaluation pipelines, better transparency systems, and controlling for random variance for my clients. Without these teams can end up with an incomplete picture of their system- leading to catastrophically wrong decisions (cue AirCanada not testing their system and it offering refunds to people).

With all of that covered, lets move on to the next section. How can we use AI to improve critical thinking and creativity? How can humans use AI effectively?

To answer this question, lets first understand the biggest problems faced by a lot of teams- cognitive overload, knowledge fragmentation, and a lack of feedback.

When it comes to reducing cognitive overload, AI-based tools can be used for delegations, planning, and quick load balancing. Once again, the goal here isnt to have AI do this perfectly, but for it to save time for users that would otherwise do this manually-

Next, lets cover knowledge fragmentation. Large organizations have a lot of projects happening, and key people often leave due to turnover, promotions, or retirement. In this environment, keeping track of all that is happening and already done becomes impossible- and there is a lot of wasted effort reinventing the wheel.

Knowledge fragmentation is a key issue for organizations. Organizational knowledge is distributed across files, notes, emails (Whittaker & Sidner 1992), chat messages, and more. Actions taken to generate, verify, and deliver knowledge often take place outside of knowledge deliverables, such as reports, occurring instead in team spaces and inboxes (Lindley & Wilkins 2023). LLMs can draw on knowledge generated through, and stored within, different tools and formats, as and when the user needs it. Such interactions may tackle key challenges associated with fragmentation, by enabling users to focus on their activity rather than having to navigate tools and file stores, a behavior that can easily introduce distractions (see e.g., Bardram et al. 2019). However, extracting knowledge from communications raises implications for how organization members are made aware of what is being accessed, how it is being surfaced, and to whom. Additionally, people will need support in understanding how insights that are not explicitly shared with others could be inferred by ML systems (Lindley & Wilkins 2023). For instance, inferences about social networks or the workflow associated with a process could be made. People will need to learn how to interpret and evaluate such inferences

This is a theme we see in a few different studies. Google has an excellent publication into what software devs want from AI. Both the 2nd and 3rd reason mentioned below can be addressed (atleast partially) by using AI to aggregate insights across platforms and unify them into one place that people can refer to.

We covered that publication in-depth over here. The final section- which talks about concrete steps that orgs must take to fully unlock their AI potential will be relevant to you, even if youre not an AI/Tech Company. For now, the simple takeaway is to encourage active documentation/logging so that your AI has plenty of data, and to invest heavily into AI systems that can interact with that Data in a useful manner.

We can summarize the main ideas in this section as follows-

Combine this with the usage of Copilot-like tools for knowledge workers, and you get something really powerful. Lets end this with a discussion the implications and the future of work.

As with any disruptive technology, AI will change not only how we do things, but also fundamentally what we do and what becomes important. Were already seeing some of this. Slide 11 brings up an interesting possibility- where knowledge work may shift towards more analysis and critical integration as opposed to raw generation.

As opposed to a naked replacement that many people claim- I think that people will simply have to dedicate a lot more time to the evaluation. Checking outputs, sources, and the base analysis of the AI are all a must, and well all probably spend a lot more time on that. Thus, there is a lot to be gained by investing in your skills for the same (or building tools there).

Similarly, soft skills and the general ability to push other people to get shit done would become even more important-

Skills not directly related to content production, such as leading, dealing with critical social situations, navigating interpersonal trust issues, and demonstrating emotional intelligence, may all be more valued in the workplace

-(LinkedIn 2023)

With a powerful tool like AI, accessibility also becomes an important discussion point. There are two important dimensions of accessibility-

The second is critical, but much harder. Open-sourcing research/other important ideas in AI is my goal and the reason why my primary publication- AI Made Simple- doesnt have any paywalls. However, thats a very small part of what needs to be done. I have some ideas on what we can do to push things forward- but this is something that needs a lot open conversations from a lot of people. If you have any ideas/want to discuss things with me, shoot me a message and lets talk. Once again, you can find my primary publication AI Made Simple over here, message me on LinkedIn, or reach out to me through any of my social media over here.

If you liked this article and wish to share it, please refer to the following guidelines.

That is it for this piece. I appreciate your time. As always, if youre interested in working with me or checking out my other work, my links will be at the end of this email/post. And if you found value in this write-up, I would appreciate you sharing it with more people. It is word-of-mouth referrals like yours that help me grow.

I put a lot of effort into creating work that is informative, useful, and independent from undue influence. If youd like to support my writing, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. Doing so helps me put more effort into writing/research, reach more people, and supports my crippling chocolate milk addiction. Help me democratize the most important ideas in AI Research and Engineering to over 100K readers weekly.

Help me buy chocolate milk

PS- We follow a pay what you can model, which allows you to support within your means. Check out this post for more details and to find a plan that works for you.

I regularly share mini-updates on what I read on the Microblogging sites X(https://twitter.com/Machine01776819), Threads(https://www.threads.net/@iseethings404), and TikTok(https://www.tiktok.com/@devansh_ai_made_simple)- so follow me there if youre interested in keeping up with my learnings.

Use the links below to check out my other content, learn more about tutoring, reach out to me about projects, or just to say hi.

Small Snippets about Tech, AI and Machine Learning over here

AI Newsletter- https://artificialintelligencemadesimple.substack.com/

My grandmas favorite Tech Newsletter- https://codinginterviewsmadesimple.substack.com/

Check out my other articles on Medium. : https://rb.gy/zn1aiu

My YouTube: https://rb.gy/88iwdd

Reach out to me on LinkedIn. Lets connect: https://rb.gy/m5ok2y

My Instagram: https://rb.gy/gmvuy9

My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Machine01776819

Originally posted here:

Microsoft's Guide to using AI to become more Productive - Medium

Read More..

Who of us will survive the AI takeover? – Osceola Sun

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Read the original post:

Who of us will survive the AI takeover? - Osceola Sun

Read More..