Page 713«..1020..712713714715..720730..»

Companies that had their IPO in 1998 – Cantech Letter

The year 1998 was a significant one in the world of technology and finance, particularly marked by a surge in initial public offerings (IPOs) in the tech sector, fueled by the dot-com boom. This period was characterized by an unprecedented level of excitement and optimism regarding internet-based companies and the potential of the World Wide Web, which was still relatively new to the public and businesses.

During this time, investors were eager to pour money into any company that had a .com in its name, often overlooking traditional business metrics like profitability, revenue, or viable business models. The stock market saw a proliferation of tech startups going public, with their stock prices often soaring on their first day of trading, driven by high investor demand and speculation. This phenomenon led to inflated valuations of many tech companies.

Among the notable IPOs in 1998, there were some standout companies that attracted significant attention. For instance, eBay, the online auction and shopping website, had its IPO in this year, and it was a major success. The eBay IPO was emblematic of the era, demonstrating how a novel internet-based business model could capture the imagination of investors and achieve a high market valuation.

The 1998 IPO frenzy was part of a larger tech bubble that grew in the late 1990s. The excitement was based on the belief that the internet would fundamentally change business and society. However, this enthusiasm often led to overvaluation and speculation, with many investors and companies assuming that traditional business metrics could be overlooked in favor of growth and market share acquisition.

The eventual bursting of the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s led to a market correction, with many of the companies that had gone public during this period seeing their values plummet, and some going out of business entirely. The period also brought about a reevaluation of investment strategies and a more cautious approach to tech IPOs, with greater scrutiny on the fundamentals of the business, rather than the hype surrounding the internet and technology.

In summary, the IPO scene of 1998 was a hallmark of the dot-com boom, marked by a flurry of tech startups going public amidst a climate of optimism and speculation about the potential of the internet. This period played a crucial role in shaping the tech industry and the approach to tech investments in the years that followed.

Amdocs, a company known for its software and services for communications, media, and financial services providers, made its mark on the financial markets with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. As an IPO, Amdocs offering was a significant event, particularly because of the context in which it occurred during the dot-com boom, a period characterized by high investor enthusiasm for technology and telecommunications stocks.

Founded in Israel in 1982, Amdocs developed a reputation for providing customer care, billing, and order management systems for telecommunications carriers. By the time of its IPO, Amdocs had already established itself as a significant player in its field, serving a global client base with its software solutions. This positioning helped the company stand out amidst the numerous tech and internet-based companies that were going public around the same time.

The Amdocs IPO was noteworthy for several reasons. First, it was one of the larger IPOs of that year and attracted considerable attention from investors interested in the telecommunications sector. Unlike many tech startups going public at the time, Amdocs had a solid history of operations and a proven business model, which offered some assurance to potential investors.

Moreover, the success of the Amdocs IPO was reflective of the broader market trends. There was a high demand for shares of technology and telecom-related companies, fueled by the widespread belief that these sectors would continue to experience significant growth. Amdocs, with its established business in a vital tech sector, was well-positioned to capitalize on this investor sentiment.

The performance of Amdocs stock post-IPO was also an indicator of the companys strength. While many other companies that debuted in the market around the same period experienced turbulent journeys, especially after the dot-com bubble burst in the early 2000s, Amdocs managed to navigate these challenging times relatively well. This resilience was partly due to the companys focus on providing essential services to telecommunications companies, a sector that remained vital even during market downturns.

In conclusion, the Amdocs IPO in 1998 was a significant event in the tech and telecommunications sectors, coming at a time when investor interest in these areas was particularly high. The companys successful transition to a publicly-traded entity reflected both the strengths of its business model and the broader market enthusiasm for technology-related stocks during the late 1990s.

Broadcast.com, a pioneering internet company, had a notable moment in its history with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. This event was particularly significant in the context of the late 1990s, a period characterized by immense investor enthusiasm for internet-related businesses, often referred to as the dot-com boom.

Founded in 1995 by Mark Cuban and Todd Wagner, Broadcast.com specialized in online multimedia and streaming technology, providing a platform for broadcasting live and pre-recorded events over the internet. This was at a time when the concept of streaming media was in its infancy, and internet bandwidth was still a limiting factor for many users.

The Broadcast.com IPO in 1998 was one of the most successful of that era. On its first day of trading, the companys stock price soared, nearly tripling in value. This dramatic increase was a testament to the feverish investor appetite for anything related to the internet and the growing recognition of the potential of online media.

What made Broadcast.com particularly attractive to investors was its unique position in the burgeoning field of online streaming. The company was one of the first to recognize and capitalize on the potential of the internet as a medium for broadcasting events, music, and other forms of entertainment, at a time when traditional media companies were still trying to figure out their online strategies.

Broadcast.coms success post-IPO was short-lived, however, as the company quickly became a target for acquisition. In 1999, it was acquired by Yahoo! in a deal valued at $5.7 billion, one of the largest acquisitions during the dot-com era. This acquisition was seen as a strategic move by Yahoo! to enhance its multimedia and streaming capabilities and compete more effectively in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

However, the acquisition did not realize the full potential that many had envisioned. The integration of Broadcast.com into Yahoo!s operations faced several challenges, and the expected synergies did not materialize as anticipated. Additionally, the burst of the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s led to a dramatic shift in the internet business landscape, affecting many companies, including those within Yahoo!s portfolio.

Despite its relatively brief independent existence, Broadcast.coms IPO remains a notable episode in the history of the internet. It symbolized the immense possibilities that the internet held for transforming media and entertainment, and it was a harbinger of the streaming revolution that would unfold in the years to follow. The story of Broadcast.com also serves as a cautionary tale about the volatility of the tech market, especially during periods of speculative investment frenzy like the dot-com boom.

Celestica, a key player in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry, marked a significant milestone with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. Based in Toronto, Canada, Celestica was originally a part of IBM before becoming an independent entity, and by the time of its IPO, it had established itself as a major name in the provision of electronics manufacturing and supply chain services to a range of high-tech companies.

The timing of Celesticas IPO was crucial, as it coincided with a period of robust growth and optimism in the technology sector. The late 1990s saw a surge in demand for technology and telecommunications equipment, fueled by the dot-com boom and the expanding global internet infrastructure. This environment created a fertile ground for companies like Celestica, whose services were integral to the production of electronic components and systems for a wide array of technology products.

During its IPO, Celestica was well-received in the market, reflecting investors confidence in the EMS sector and the role of companies like Celestica in the global technology supply chain. The companys offering was seen as a solid investment, given its established customer base, which included some of the biggest names in technology, and its proven track record in managing complex manufacturing processes.

Post-IPO, Celestica continued to grow, capitalizing on the increasing trend of outsourcing in the electronics industry. Many large technology firms were looking to streamline operations and reduce costs by outsourcing manufacturing processes, and Celesticas expertise positioned it well to capture a significant share of this market.

However, the early 2000s brought challenges, as the burst of the dot-com bubble led to a downturn in the technology sector. This shift had repercussions for the EMS industry, including Celestica, as demand for electronics manufacturing services waned with the reduced pace of growth in technology spending. Like many in its sector, Celestica had to navigate these challenging economic conditions, adjusting its operations and strategy to align with the changing market dynamics.

Despite these challenges, Celesticas IPO remains an important event in the tech and manufacturing sectors, signifying the growing importance of the EMS industry in the global technology ecosystem. Celesticas evolution from an internal division of a major corporation to a publicly traded company is reflective of broader trends in technology manufacturing, where agility, specialization, and global supply chain management have become critical components of success.

Descartes Systems Group, a Canadian company specializing in logistics software, supply chain management software, and cloud-based services for logistics businesses, experienced a significant milestone with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. The timing of Descartes IPO was notable, as it coincided with the burgeoning interest in technology and internet-related stocks during the late 1990s, a period often referred to as the dot-com boom.

Founded in the early 1980s, Descartes Systems Group had established itself as a leader in providing innovative solutions that addressed complex logistics and supply chain challenges. The companys software solutions were designed to optimize and streamline transportation and logistics operations, making it an essential player in a rapidly globalizing economy. By the time of its IPO, Descartes had a solid customer base and a strong reputation in the logistics technology sector.

The Descartes IPO came at a time when investors were eagerly looking for growth opportunities in the technology sector. The market was particularly receptive to companies that offered internet-based solutions or services that could leverage the growing capabilities of the internet. Descartes focus on logistics software, which was increasingly becoming essential for businesses around the world as they managed complex supply chains, made it an attractive proposition for investors.

The IPO was well-received, reflecting the confidence of the market in Descartes business model and its growth potential in the burgeoning field of logistics technology. This positive response was indicative of the broader trend of investor enthusiasm for tech stocks during this era.

Post-IPO, Descartes Systems Group continued to evolve and grow, adapting to changes in the global logistics landscape. The early 2000s were challenging for many technology companies, particularly in the wake of the dot-com bubble burst. However, Descartes managed to navigate these challenges, partly due to its focus on a specialized niche in the logistics and supply chain sector, an area that remained critical despite broader economic fluctuations.

Over time, Descartes expanded its offerings, integrating cloud-based technologies and expanding its global reach. The companys growth strategy often involved strategic acquisitions that complemented and expanded its core capabilities in logistics and supply chain management.

The story of Descartes Systems Groups IPO and subsequent growth is illustrative of the opportunities and challenges faced by technology companies in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It highlights the potential for specialized software solutions in global business operations, particularly in areas like logistics and supply chain management that are crucial to the functioning of the global economy. Descartes journey from its IPO to its position as a key player in logistics technology underscores the importance of innovation, adaptability, and strategic growth in the tech sector.

DoubleClick, an internet advertising company, had a notable chapter in its corporate story with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. This event was especially significant in the context of the late 1990s, during the dot-com boom, a period marked by fervent investor interest in internet-related businesses.

Founded in 1996, DoubleClick quickly became a pioneer in the field of online advertising. The company developed and provided internet ad serving services, a technology that was revolutionary at the time. DoubleClicks technology allowed advertisers and publishers to track the performance of ads and manage their advertising inventory efficiently, filling a critical need in the rapidly growing world of online marketing.

The timing of DoubleClicks IPO was fortuitous, aligning with the burgeoning interest in digital advertising and the broader excitement around internet-based companies. The late 1990s saw a surge in online activity and an increasing recognition of the internets potential as a commercial platform. In this environment, DoubleClicks offering was met with considerable enthusiasm by investors who were eager to capitalize on the digital revolution.

On its first day of trading, DoubleClicks stock price soared, reflecting the high hopes and optimistic projections for the online advertising industry. This successful IPO was a testament to the perceived value and future potential of online advertising technologies and positioned DoubleClick as one of the frontrunners in this emerging field.

Post-IPO, DoubleClick continued to expand and innovate, riding the wave of the dot-com boom. The company played a significant role in shaping the online advertising landscape, introducing new technologies and strategies for ad placement and tracking. However, the early 2000s brought challenges, as the burst of the dot-com bubble led to a reevaluation of many internet-based businesses. Despite the downturn, DoubleClick managed to sustain its operations, albeit amidst a more challenging business environment.

DoubleClicks story took another significant turn in 2005, when it was acquired by private equity firm Hellman & Friedman, and later, in a landmark move, was acquired by Google in 2007 for $3.1 billion. This acquisition marked a pivotal moment in the online advertising world, solidifying Googles position in the digital advertising space and underlining the importance of ad serving technology as a key component of the online ecosystem.

DoubleClicks journey from its IPO to its eventual acquisition by Google illustrates the rapid evolution of the online advertising industry and the broader digital landscape. The companys rise, challenges, and ultimate integration into one of the worlds leading tech companies highlight the volatile nature of the tech industry, especially during periods of rapid technological change and market speculation.

eBay, the renowned online auction and shopping website, experienced a defining moment in its history with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. This event came at a pivotal time during the late 1990s, characterized by the dot-com boom, where investor enthusiasm for internet-related businesses was at an all-time high.

Founded by Pierre Omidyar in 1995, eBay quickly evolved from a quirky site hosting auctions for collectible items into a massive online marketplace. It gained popularity by enabling people to buy and sell a wide variety of goods and services worldwide. By the time of its IPO, eBay had already established itself as a significant player in the emerging world of e-commerce, differentiating itself with its user-friendly platform and a diverse range of products.

The timing of eBays IPO was strategic, tapping into the markets growing fascination with the internet and e-commerce. This period saw a rapid expansion in online activity and a recognition of the internets potential to transform traditional retail and commerce. eBays model of creating a virtual marketplace where anyone could buy or sell goods resonated with the public and investors alike.

When eBay went public in 1998, the response from investors was overwhelmingly positive. The IPO was a resounding success, with stock prices soaring on the first day of trading. This enthusiastic reception was a testament to the markets confidence in eBays business model and its future potential in the burgeoning e-commerce sector.

Following its IPO, eBay entered a phase of rapid growth and expansion. The company continuously enhanced its platform, introducing new features and services to improve the user experience and expand its market reach. eBays early focus on community building, customer feedback, and secure payment methods like PayPal, which it acquired in 2002, played crucial roles in its growth and the trust it built with users.

However, the journey wasnt without challenges. The early 2000s, marked by the burst of the dot-com bubble, tested the resilience of many internet companies. Despite these market upheavals, eBay managed to sustain and grow its operations, benefiting from its already established brand and a loyal user base.

eBays story from its IPO through its rapid growth encapsulates the dynamic nature of the tech industry, especially in the field of e-commerce. The companys success story became a model for online retail and has significantly influenced how people buy and sell goods over the internet. eBays evolution from a startup to a global e-commerce giant illustrates the potential of innovative business models in the digital age, particularly those that prioritize user engagement and adapt to changing market needs.

GeoCities, a web hosting service that rose to prominence in the 1990s, marked a significant chapter in the history of the internet with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. The GeoCities IPO was a landmark event, coming during the dot-com boom, a period characterized by intense investor interest in internet-related companies.

Founded in 1994 by David Bohnett and John Rezner, GeoCities provided a unique platform where users could create their own websites, organized into thematic neighborhoods. It was one of the first platforms to democratize web presence, allowing users with little to no technical expertise to build their own web pages. By the time of its IPO, GeoCities had grown into one of the most visited sites on the internet, renowned for its vibrant community and diverse array of user-generated content.

The IPO of GeoCities tapped into the excitement surrounding the internets potential and the growing interest in social aspects of the web. In the late 1990s, the notion of community-building online was gaining traction, and GeoCities was at the forefront of this movement. This backdrop contributed to the enthusiastic reception of GeoCities IPO, where investors saw the company not just as a web hosting service, but as a gateway to the expanding digital community and online interactions.

Upon going public in 1998, GeoCities experienced a significant surge in its stock price, reflecting the markets optimism about the future of internet communities and user-generated content. The success of its IPO highlighted GeoCities role in shaping the early internet landscape and its perceived potential for further growth.

However, the journey post-IPO was not without challenges. The company faced several issues, including mounting competition from other web hosting services, concerns over the commercialization of user-generated content, and the complexities of managing a rapidly growing online community. Despite these hurdles, GeoCities continued to be a significant player in the web hosting space.

In a major turn of events, GeoCities was acquired by Yahoo! in 1999 for approximately $3.6 billion, a move that underscored the value of web communities and user-generated content in the eyes of major internet companies. However, under Yahoo!s stewardship, GeoCities gradually lost its prominence. Changing web trends, competition, and strategic shifts at Yahoo! led to the eventual closure of GeoCities in the United States in 2009.

The story of GeoCities, from its IPO to its acquisition and eventual shutdown, offers a glimpse into the rapidly evolving nature of the internet in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It illustrates the massive potential of online communities and user-generated content, as well as the challenges inherent in sustaining and monetizing such platforms. GeoCities rise and fall is a notable example of the dynamic, often unpredictable nature of the tech industry, particularly during the speculative fervor of the dot-com era.

InfoSpace, a company that emerged during the early days of the internet, made a significant mark with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. This event was a key milestone, situated in the midst of the dot-com boom, an era characterized by heightened investor enthusiasm for internet-based companies.

Founded by Naveen Jain in 1996, InfoSpace specialized in providing online content and services, including search engines, email, and news, to websites and mobile device manufacturers. The companys approach was innovative for its time, focusing on syndicating and aggregating content for various third-party sites and platforms, rather than building its own consumer brand. By the time of its IPO, InfoSpace had established itself as a significant behind-the-scenes player in the burgeoning internet landscape.

The timing of InfoSpaces IPO in 1998 was strategic, tapping into the markets growing appetite for internet stocks. The late 1990s saw a rapid expansion of the internet and a widespread belief in its potential to revolutionize various industries. InfoSpace, with its diverse range of internet services and partnerships with numerous telecom and web companies, was well-positioned to capitalize on this trend.

When InfoSpace went public, the reception from investors was highly positive. The IPO was successful, with the stock price rising significantly, reflecting the markets optimism about the companys business model and the broader potential of the internet sector. This success underscored the perceived value of InfoSpaces role as an aggregator and provider of internet content and services.

Following its IPO, InfoSpace experienced a period of rapid growth, expanding its services and increasing its partnerships. The company also made a series of acquisitions, further diversifying its offerings and attempting to consolidate its position in the market.

However, the early 2000s, marked by the burst of the dot-com bubble, brought challenges for InfoSpace, as it did for many other tech companies. The industry faced a significant downturn, and InfoSpace was not immune to these market shifts. The company had to navigate through a series of strategic, financial, and legal challenges during this tumultuous period.

Despite these challenges, InfoSpace managed to endure and transform over time. It shifted its focus and rebranded several times, eventually evolving into Blucora, a provider of technology-enabled financial solutions.

The story of InfoSpaces IPO and its subsequent journey is reflective of the broader narrative of the tech industry during the late 1990s and early 2000s. It exemplifies the rapid rise and challenges faced by internet companies in an era marked by great enthusiasm and subsequent reevaluation of the dot-com sector. InfoSpaces evolution from an internet content provider to its current incarnation is a testament to the dynamic and ever-changing nature of the technology industry.

VeriSign, a company that plays a critical role in the infrastructure of the internet, had a notable moment in its history with its initial public offering (IPO) in 1998. This event was a significant one, coming at a time when the dot-com boom was in full swing, and there was immense investor excitement around internet technology companies.

Established in 1995, VeriSign quickly became known for its digital security services, primarily focusing on domain name registry services and internet security. It managed the .com, .net, and .org domain name system (DNS) registries, a crucial component of the internets infrastructure, ensuring stability and security in online communications. By the time of its IPO, VeriSign had already established a strong presence in the industry, recognized for its essential role in maintaining and securing internet domain names.

The timing of VeriSigns IPO was opportune, aligning with the rapid expansion of the internet and growing concerns about online security. In the late 1990s, as the internet began to see widespread commercial use, the need for robust security measures and reliable domain name services became increasingly evident. VeriSigns offering was therefore viewed as not just a business investment, but as an investment in the foundational elements of the digital economy.

The market responded positively to VeriSigns IPO, reflecting both the companys importance in the internet infrastructure and the overall enthusiasm for technology stocks at the time. The successful IPO demonstrated a clear recognition by the market of VeriSigns critical role and its potential for growth in an increasingly connected world.

Following its IPO, VeriSign continued to expand its services, further cementing its position as a leader in domain name registry and internet security. The company navigated through the turbulent period of the early 2000s, which saw the burst of the dot-com bubble and a subsequent reassessment of many internet-focused businesses. Despite these challenges, VeriSigns services remained in high demand, given their fundamental role in the functioning of the internet.

Over the years, VeriSign has had to adapt to changing technological landscapes and regulatory environments. The companys focus on maintaining a secure and stable internet infrastructure has led to continued investment in technology and infrastructure upgrades, ensuring it remains at the forefront of domain name and internet security services.

The journey of VeriSign, from its IPO through its evolution in the following years, underscores the critical nature of internet infrastructure services. The companys story highlights the importance of security and stability in the digital age, reflecting the ongoing need for such services as the internet continues to expand and evolve. VeriSigns sustained presence and growth in the industry exemplify the enduring value and relevance of foundational internet services in the ever-changing technology landscape.

More here:
Companies that had their IPO in 1998 - Cantech Letter

Read More..

The ‘Valley of Death’ or the ‘Yellow Brick Road’? – Signal Magazine

On one side of history, the newer generation of vendors benefited greatly from the federal government. Ever heard of Fidelis, Palo Alto, ArcSight or Blue Coat? That is a partial list of startups focusing on government after Y2K. If you reviewed those companies sales for the first five-plus years of their existence, more than 50%and probably closer to 90%went to the federal government. Their products, features, staff and market position were all created by sales to the federal government with no special programs or funding avenues to take advantage of. The federal government was actually the Yellow Brick Road, not the Valley of Death.

However, before FASA/FARA, we encountered several companies that once stood as giants but eventually succumbed to the fast-changing industry. Novell, once a dominant force in networking operating systems, could not scale or adapt to meet the ever-changing market demands and lost its position to Microsoft. The browser pioneer Netscape faced a similar fate as it failed to transition effectively in fierce competition from Internet Explorer and Google. These examples teach us the importance of adaptability and the risks of stagnation in a rapidly evolving market. For both vendors as well as users, adaptability is key to survival. Maybe you have a policy that is 10 years old and unchanged. If so, you may want to look at it. This is one of the DNA factors for the government Valley of Death creation. They dont like change; they like safety and security. Industry doesnt want that. It does not make you money.

The federal governments adoption of innovative technologies has frequently presented its unique set of challenges. Centralized procurement and decision-making processes have often resulted in long sales cycles, making it challenging for the government to respond quickly to emerging technology trends. While centralization offers economies of scale, it can hinder the timely implementation of cutting-edge solutions, particularly in the face of evolving threats and opportunities. When the industry started, we needed centralization. Multiple operating systems, office suites and hardware manufacturers caused many inefficiencies and problems. That environment no longer exists, but the policies do. Does your agency test all updates before they are pushed out to all users? The blue screen of death is ancient history, but the policies to prevent it are not.

Over the years, various government initiatives have demonstrated how innovation can thrive despite the current Valley of Death challenges. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), renowned for its role in developing breakthrough technologies like the internet and GPS, showcases how targeted investments and risk-taking can revolutionize the technology landscape. Moreover, the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program has nurtured numerous startups, fostering a culture of innovation within the government. But even those are large and slow programs.

Excerpt from:
The 'Valley of Death' or the 'Yellow Brick Road'? - Signal Magazine

Read More..

Bitcoin and Ethereum Options Worth $4.5 Billion Set To Expire Today – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin and Ethereum Options Worth $4.5 Billion Set To Expire Today

The crypto options market is facing a major event today that could lead to increased volatility and shifting prices for major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

According to data from Deribit, over $4.5 billion worth of options contracts in Bitcoin and Ethereum are set to expire at 8:00 UTC on Friday, October 27.

Options give buyers the right but not the obligation to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price on or before a specific expiration date. As these options reach their expiration date, holders will have to decide whether to exercise their contracts or let them expire worthless.

This could lead to a spike in trading volume and volatility around the expiration time as market participants react to whether large options positions are exercised or not. CoinDesk reported the current open interest in contract terms has increased to $20.64, significantly higher than in November 2021 when BTC was around $66,000.

The impending options expiration comes after a period of positive price movement for top cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin rose from around $26,000 to over $34,000 in recent weeks. This market activity led to increased options trading.

Traders and investors will be closely watching the impact of this historic options expiration as it unfolds today. The $4.5 billion in contracts set to expire represents the scale of the crypto options market today, and how it can drive price action and volatility in underlying assets.

View original post here:

Bitcoin and Ethereum Options Worth $4.5 Billion Set To Expire Today - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

Why Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin Surged Higher This Week – The Motley Fool

What a week it was for mega-cap cryptocurrencies. Three of the most popular digital assets out there,Bitcoin(BTC 2.52%),Ethereum(ETH 2.07%) andDogecoin(DOGE 2.12%), each saw impressive gains. As of 12:45 p.m. ET on Friday, these three top-10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization rose 14.7%, 10.4% and 15.4%, respectively, over the past seven days.

It shouldn't be surprising for many investors to see Bitcoin lead the market higher, as that's par for the course for this space. With roughly half the market cap of the entire crypto sector, the direction Bitcoin moves on a given week typically determines how other digital assets perform.

Accordingly, one might view this week's news that a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) could be hitting the market sooner than thought as the rising tide that's lifting all boats. I certainly think there's something to that.

With that said, let's dive into what specifically drove these three cryptos higher over the past week and where they may be headed from here.

It's been a busy week in the world of crypto, with the Sam Bankman-Fried trial ongoing, various macro-data releases impacting monetary policy decisions released, and a flurry of token-specific news that's been enough to make the heads of many investors in the market spin. Of course, this week's Bitcoin news has dominated the headlines, and for good reason.

Essentially, a number of hints that Blackrock's spot Bitcoin ETF will finally be pushed over the goal line have materialized this week, with this ETF reportedly being listed on the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation database under the ticker IBTC.

This ticker appears to have been taken down and put back up again, but the fact that we're seeing this ticker listed is apparently enough of a catalyst for crypto bulls to point to. Many believe this could be the moment Bitcoin is officially viewed as 'open for investment' for institutional investors, much in the same way gold ETFs made investing in precious metals much simpler and more attractive for money managers.

On that note, I've been reading a number of interesting analyses on this topic, with many experts attempting to quantify what a spot Bitcoin ETF could mean for the digital currency in terms of capital inflows into Bitcoin and the broader sector as a whole. Right now, I think most of these reports require a great deal of guesswork, so I'm not sure how much credence to give these.However, I do think it's true that Bitcoin and Ethereum (assuming a spot Ethereum ETF is next, which would be 100% logical) will receive a big boost from a rush of capital into these alternative assets.

Other, more speculative altcoins, such as Dogecoin, may be well positioned to ride a wave of momentum higher. Dogecoin's price action typically takes its cue from the directional forces created by Bitcoin and Ethereum in a given week.

Indeed, the fact that Dogecoin has moved even higher than Bitcoin and Ethereum on broadly bullish market sentiment outlines the value this token provides traders as a higher-beta option in this space. A number of experts continue to point to "irrational exuberance" when discussing Dogecoin's price action over the past few days as the key driver of this token. I tend to agree.

It's clear that there's robust reason for Bitcoin and Ethereum to be up this week. As for the rest of the market, animal spirits appear to remain high, which is a great thing for crypto speculators banking on yet another catalyst-driven bull run over the near term.

That said, the extent to which this rally can be sustained beyond a few days remains to be seen. Once a spot Bitcoin ETF is launched (and maybe a similar Ethereum option), it's unclear whether the bullish momentum that's driven valuations higher can continue. Indeed, it could be the latest "buy the rumor, sell the news" event. We'll see.

It's my view that now may be a good time to take a cautious view of this space and wait for the dust to settle before stepping in. These three tokens have made nice moves over the past week, for sure. Let's just see whether these gains will be held before jumping in to ride this latest leg higher.

Read the original:

Why Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin Surged Higher This Week - The Motley Fool

Read More..

Ethereum dApps deemed not-decentralized after WalletConnect blocks Russian users from the protocol – FXStreet

Ethereum is called the home of decentralized finance (DeFi), owing to the vast array of protocols running on the chain, which amount to nearly 950. Thus, it does not come as a surprise when users react negatively to the supposed decentralized applications and decide to alter who can and cannot access their protocols.

Ethereum is the base chain that supports the operation of the open-source protocol that enables the communication and interaction between a wallet and dApps. The protocol recently became the target of crypto enthusiasts after WalletConnect decided to take some measures.

The protocol over the past 24 hours blocked all users from Russia and some parts of Ukraine. People using the service were given an error 1009 access denied message. As this came to light, crypto users, as well as influencers, took to X, formerly Twitter, to express their anger over the app.

Popular crypto researcher Chris Blec tweeted,

WalletConnect, an app that is deeply baked into the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem, is now blocking normal users in Ukraine, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, and Syria. They are punishing these people for the sins of their tyrannical governments. This is the state of Ethereum in 2023.

These claims can be verified by accessing the source code of the protocol since it is open-source, wherein it is evident that not just Russia and Ukraine but users from North Korea, Syria, Cuba and Iran are also facing similar issues.

Users even suggested that the fact that such an option exists is proof that the protocol is not truly decentralized. The point of being decentralized is so that no one authority or entity can control the actions of other participants, which has been evidently flouted by WalletConnect. Another user stated,

Seriously, I just lost my business forever. A custody interface platform ability to block usage by geo is not protection it is liability this should not be engineered into their connect platform.

WalletConnect supports over 75 top wallets on the blockchain, which makes this move rather significant, given about 6.76% of the entire traffic they receive comes from Russia, making it their third largest target country.

WalletConnect traffic source

WalletConnect, upon being criticized for their decision, issued a statement on Twitter where they cited the latest legal and OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) guidance. The Delaware-based protocol is facing the same problems as other crypto companies in the United States: lack of clear regulations.

Back when Russia attacked Ukraine in February this year, the regulatory authorities in the US ensured sanctions on certain Russian oligarchs and blocked their access on Binance, Coinbase and other top exchanges to prevent them from selling their crypto holdings.

Thus, in the end, the blame goes back to the regulatory issue in the USA. WalletConnect CEO Pedro Gomes, in the statement, also said that while some Ukraine areas IP addresses were blocked initially, they have since been re-enabled. He also did not confirm the blocking of other countries mentioned in the GitHub source code, saying, We can confirm that no other countries were blocked.

See more here:

Ethereum dApps deemed not-decentralized after WalletConnect blocks Russian users from the protocol - FXStreet

Read More..

ChatGPT Gives Verdict On Whether XRP Will Outperform Ethereum … – Finbold – Finance in Bold

Press Releases are sponsored content and not a part of Finbold's editorial content. For a full disclaimer, please . If you encounter any issues, kindly report them to [emailprotected]. Crypto assets/products can be highly risky. Never invest unless youre prepared to lose all the money you invest.

The rivalry between XRP (XRP) and Ethereum (ETH) has been heating up recently as both tokens jostle for dominance in the crypto market.

While Ethereum currently reigns supreme as the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, some experts predict XRP could outperform ETH in 2024.

We asked ChatGPT which of the two tokens has better prospects for the coming year before asking it to identify which under-the-radar altcoins could also be poised for explosive growth.

The last few weeks have been great for XRP holders, with the tokens value up 20% since October 19.

During that surge, XRP breached the key resistance levels at $0.50 and $0.55 both of which had proved to be formidable obstacles in the past.

Now, XRP is trading at its highest level since mid-August and is creating a strong uptrend on the weekly chart, with higher highs followed by lower highs.

According to CoinGecko sentiment analysis, more than 88% of users are feeling good about XRPs prospects, showcasing the growing belief that the token could rise in 2024.

Ethereum has also been going through a bullish phase, with a significant increase in its trading volume and price.

At the time of writing, ETH is hovering around the $1,802 level, having breached the key resistance zone at $1,750.

Although ETH has pulled back slightly from last Thursdays high, investor sentiment on Ethereum remains bullish.

We asked AI assistant ChatGPT for its take on whether XRP or Ethereum was better positioned for 2024.

For XRP, it noted the current bullish price trend, high user optimism, and resolved legal issues as potential price catalysts.

However, it ultimately favored Ethereum due to its market maturity, ongoing upgrades to its network, diverse ecosystem, and use cases beyond being just a digital asset.

ChatGPT believes that these attributes give Ethereum a more robust foundation for long-term growth that matches or surpasses the momentum that XRP has recently gained.

While acknowledging XRPs promise, especially after resolving its troubles with the SEC, ChatGPT believes Ethereums depth as a decentralized ecosystem makes it more likely to outperform XRP in 2024.

While the battle between XRP and Ethereum will be exciting for investors, some lesser-known altcoins could be surprise packages in 2024.

One such altcoin is Bitcoin Minetrix, which ChatGPT believes could be primed for a fruitful year ahead of it.

Bitcoin Minetrix (BTCMTX) is an innovative Stake-to-Mine platform that allows everyday crypto enthusiasts to participate in decentralized BTC mining just by staking BTCMTX tokens.

Users can earn cloud mining credits to exchange for BTC mining power or yields, all while enjoying sky-high staking rewards of over 200% APY.

With a clear roadmap that includes launching a mobile app and partnering with large cloud mining institutions, Bitcoin Minetrix has exciting plans to expand its ecosystem in 2024 and beyond.

The projects presale is currently ongoing and features a tier-based structure, meaning the offered BTCMTX price will increase on a regular basis.

Currently, early investors can buy BTCMTX tokens for $0.0113 a setup that has helped raise over $2.8 million in early investment from investors around the world.

With its novel Stake-to-Mine concept and ambitious vision, Bitcoin Minetrix appears positioned for major growth in 2024 as the next BTC halving event approaches.

When presented with these factors to consider, ChatGPT believes Bitcoin Minetrix has strong potential for price appreciation.

The AI model believes that a price target of between $0.05 and $0.10 isnt out of the question for BTCMTX if the development team continues to make progress on the projects roadmap.

This optimistic projection will be warmly received by members of the Bitcoin Minetrix Telegram community, who have been eagerly awaiting signs of validation for their early investment in the project.

Visit Bitcoin Minetrix Presale

See the original post:

ChatGPT Gives Verdict On Whether XRP Will Outperform Ethereum ... - Finbold - Finance in Bold

Read More..

Bitcoin vs Ethereum: What are the Key Differences? – Analytics Insight

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum

Bitcoin and Ethereum are often compared as the leading cryptocurrencies in the market. Both of them use blockchain technology to enable peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries. However, Bitcoin and Ethereum have different visions, goals, and features that make them distinct from each other.

Purpose: Bitcoins main purpose is to serve as a store of value and a medium of exchange. It is designed to be a digital gold that can be used as a global payment system and a hedge against inflation. Bitcoins core features are its limited supply of 21 million coins, its high security, and its censorship resistance. Ethereums main purpose is to serve as a platform for decentralized computing. It is designed to be a world computer that can run various applications that are powered by smart contracts.

Smart Contracts: Bitcoin has a limited scripting language that allows for some basic forms of smart contracts, such as multi-sig transactions or time-locked transactions. However, Bitcoins smart contracts are not as expressive or complete as Ethereums smart contracts, which can support complex logic, data structures, and computations. Ethereums smart contracts are written in various programming languages such as Solidity or Vyper, and can be used to create dApps that range from decentralized finance (DeFi) to gaming to social media.

Transactions: Bitcoin transactions are mainly for transferring value from one address to another. They consist of inputs, outputs, amounts, signatures, and fees. Bitcoin transactions are validated by miners who compete to solve cryptographic puzzles and earn block rewards and transaction fees. Bitcoin transactions are relatively slow, taking an average of 10 minutes to confirm on the network. Ethereum transactions are more diverse and can include not only value transfers but also function calls to smart contracts or contract deployments. They consist of nonce, gas price, gas limit, value, data, signature, and fees.

Mining: Bitcoin uses a consensus algorithm called Proof-of-Work (PoW), which requires miners to use their computational power to secure the network and process transactions. PoW is energy-intensive and prone to centralization due to the dominance of large mining pools and specialized hardware (ASICs). Ethereum also uses PoW currently, but it uses a different algorithm called Ethash, which is designed to be more ASIC-resistant and favor GPU mining. However, Ethereum plans to transition to a new consensus algorithm called Proof-of-Stake (PoS).

Scalability: Bitcoin has a scalability problem due to its limited block size of 1 MB and its low transaction throughput of around 7 transactions per second (TPS). This leads to network congestion and high fees during periods of high demand. Bitcoins scalability solutions include layer-2 protocols such as Lightning Network or sidechains such as Liquid Network that enable faster and cheaper transactions off-chain. Ethereum also has a scalability problem due to its high network usage and its low transaction throughput of around 15 TPS. This also leads to network congestion and high fees during periods of high demand.

Value: Bitcoins value is mainly derived from its scarcity, security, and network effect. It is often seen as a store of value, a hedge against inflation, and a digital gold. Bitcoins price is determined by the supply and demand of the market, and it is influenced by various factors such as adoption, regulation, innovation, sentiment, and events. Ethereums value is mainly derived from its utility, functionality, and network effect. It is often seen as a platform for innovation, a fuel for dApps, and a digital oil.

Follow this link:

Bitcoin vs Ethereum: What are the Key Differences? - Analytics Insight

Read More..

Cryptocurrencies: Solana Could Outperform Ethereum – The Cryptonomist

A recent cryptocurrency report published by VanEck claims that the performance of SOL, Solanas native cryptocurrency, could outperform ETH (Ethereum) in the coming years.

However, this is not a precise prediction, but rather assumptions about more or less good scenarios within which the price could move.

VanEcks predictions relate to the performance of the SOL price over the next ten years.

They are therefore low-probability forecasts, consisting of an extremely wide range of possibilities.

The current price of Solanas native cryptocurrency is around $36, having also fallen below $10 in December last year.

The worst-case scenario suggested by VanEck is that the price will fall below $10 in the next few years (9.8).

However, as this is one of the two extremes of a very wide range, it should only be taken as a reference point.

In fact, the best case scenario would be to exceed $3,200, i.e. an increase of 10,000% from current levels.

Taking an intermediate figure, we can say that VanEck sees the possibility of the SOL price rising above $1,500, but with a good chance of ending up well above or well below this figure.

It should be noted that SOL debuted on the crypto markets in 2020 at under $0.6 and peaked at over $260 in November 2021. So from the time of its listing to its all-time high, the gains were over 40,000%.

Typically, these incredible performances are very difficult to repeat, so a +10,000% from current values seems unlikely, although theoretically possible.

However, taking the highs from $260 to $3,200 as a reference, the gain would be +1.100%, which is not at all absurd in the crypto markets in the long term.

Moreover, the price of SOL seems to be well suited to the inflation of real speculative bubbles, such as the 2021 one. Suffice it to say that in July 2021, after the first big spike in early 2021, the price was below $30 and in less than four months it went up an incredible +1,000%. Within the next seven months, it went back to where it started, with the speculative bubble having completely deflated by then.

The starting price of $0.6 is probably of little use and not worth using as a reference point. Perhaps a better reference point would be the $9.8 reached in December 2020, which is probably not coincidentally the bottom identified by VanEck.

The other reference point could be $30, as the price of Solana has indeed been hovering around this level since June 2022, if we exclude the bracket below $10 opened by the FTX bankruptcy in November 2022 and closed already in January 2023.

In fact, VanEck is predicting a real boom in the use of SOL.

According to the report published yesterday, Solana could become the first blockchain to host an application with more than 100 million users. This hypothetical achievement would be a tipping point for the adoption and value of SOL, leading to a huge increase in value.

Another hypothesis is that Solana could reach a market share of just under half that of Ethereum, partly because it proposes a different model.

While Ethereum relies heavily on decentralisation and community governance, Solana has a more pragmatic approach dedicated to scalability and speed, which could end up attracting a different type of user and developer less interested in decentralisation.

VanEcks idea is therefore not a direct competition between Solana and Ethereum, but rather a different approach aimed at different types of users.

Comparisons can only be made on price changes over time, while on a practical level these two things would not be directly comparable.

On the other hand, the price of ETH has already experienced two huge bull runs, the one in 2017 that took it from $10 to $1,200, and then the one in 2021 that took it from $600 to almost $4,900.

At this point, it is possible to imagine that the price of SOL could also go through another similar bull run, although it should be noted that, using historical highs as a reference, Ethereums second bull run resulted in a x4 from the previous highs.

Should the next bull run also lead to a x4 in the SOL price, the new high could be around $1,000.

Finally, it should be mentioned that VanEck also offers an ETN on the SOL among its derivatives products.

Related postsMore from author

View original post here:

Cryptocurrencies: Solana Could Outperform Ethereum - The Cryptonomist

Read More..

Minimum Monthly Sales for Ethereum and Polygon NFTs in 2023: Is … – Analytics Insight

Crypto investors have stopped looking for NFTs to buy in 2023 due to a declining market interest. As a result, Ethereum- and Polygon-based NFTs recorded low sales in the past few months.

So, investors are looking for more profitable investments than $ETH and $MATIC. Meanwhile, BorroeFinance ($ROE) has emerged as a viable option in the competitive market. Keep reading to see what experts are saying about these tokens.

>>BUY $ROE TOKENS NOW<<

Dune analytics recently revealed that Ethereum-based NFTs on OpenSea recorded the worst outing yet in October 2023.

According to Dune, sales volume for Ethereum ($ETH) based NFTs fell to $49 million in October, representing a 51% decline from its $74 million September SV. For context, Ethereum ($ETH) based NFTs were still popular NFTs to buy as of January, when the total sales volume totaled $659 million.

Even though sales of Ethereum ($ETH) based NFTs have slowed, Ethereum ($ETH) performed well in the crypto market in the last week of October. On October 21, $ETH traded at $1,633. By October 28, $ETH surged 9.23% and traded for $1,783.

According to analysts, $ETH may sell for $1,900 by November 2023 due to high investor interest in top altcoins.

Aside from Ethereum ($ETH) based NFTs, Polygon-based NFTs also saw a massive decline in their trading volume in 2023. In February 2023, sales volume for Polygon ($MATIC) NFTs was around $109 million.

By September, the Polygon ($MATIC) NFTs sales volume crashed to $2.7 million, resulting in a 97.5% decline.

Regardless of the NFT market saga, Polygon ($MATIC) kept investors happy. On October 21, Polygon ($MATIC) traded at $0.5705. Within a week, $MATIC gained 8.91% and sold for $0.6210.

Analysts expect Polygon ($MATIC) to continue on its bullish trajectory and trade at $0.7200 when $POL finally replaces $MATIC as Polygons native token.

BorroeFinance ($ROE) is the worlds first web3 blockchain invoice discounting NFT marketplace. This decentralized AI-powered fundraising platform allows web3 content creators to sell future digital earnings to meet short-term liquidity needs.

Web3 participants can mint their future earnings into NFTs and sell them to supportive communities at discounted prices.

>>BUY $ROE TOKENS NOW<<

Right now, BorroeFinance ($ROE) is in its second presale stage, with the token selling for $0.015. However, projections show BorroeFinance ($ROE) will surge to $0.040 when all presale stages conclude.

Considering the current valuation, this price movement will deliver a significant 167% ROI to early BorroeFinance ($ROE) investors. Furthermore, experts say BorroeFinance ($ROE) will trade for $0.100 by June 2024 if the token records speedy market adoption, making it an even more attractive option to buy.

Visit BorroeFinance Presale | Join The Telegram Group | Follow BorroeFinance on Twitter

Go here to see the original:

Minimum Monthly Sales for Ethereum and Polygon NFTs in 2023: Is ... - Analytics Insight

Read More..

Everlodge on the rise: can it match Bitcoin and Ethereum’s growth? – CoinJournal

In the rapidly evolving realm of cryptocurrencies, a new player is making waves: Everlodge (ELDG). This burgeoning contender is in its presale phase, yet showing potential to challenge the dominance of established giants like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

This article delves into Everlodges remarkable ascent, exploring whether it has what it takes to rival the market leaders supremacy.

Everlodge is setting a new trend in the luxury real estate arena, making it possible for the average person to hold stakes in luxurious vacation properties starting at just $100. By leveraging the power of NFTs, each representing a share of a property, they are dismantling the longstanding barriers to elite real estate ventures.

All necessary legal and ownership details are carefully encrypted into the metadata of a strong smart contract. The resulting digital tokens are then segmented to allow interested investors to participate in prime real estate opportunities without spending a fortune.

But theres more. Everlodge isnt just a marketplace; it doubles as a launchpad for budding property developers. They can tap into the community, sourcing funds for their ambitious projects. Its a symbiotic setup developers get the required capital, and users get a shot at lucrative early-bird opportunities.

ELDG is the primary currency in the Everlodge world. It serves as the platforms heartbeat. Holding onto ELDG tokens offers a range of benefits, such as trading discounts and reduced maintenance charges. Token staking provides an opportunity to earn a consistent monthly yield, enabling passive income.

The buzz is real. Currently, ELDG tokens are up for grabs at just $0.23 each in the sixth phase of the presale. This rate isnt here to stay, as it is set to keep rising as more people jump on board.

Once the presale ends, ELDG will debut in tier-one exchanges, potentially catapulting its value. Market whispers hint at a colossal 30x surge post the tokens debut on leading exchanges.

For more information about the Everlodge (ELDG) Presale you can visit theirwebsite or join their communityhere.

Bitcoins journey has been nothing short of a rollercoaster lately. After a promising kick-off to the year, the cryptocurrency took a surprising dip in mid-August, plummeting from $30k to a worrying sub-$25k. The price has since rebounded to the current price of $26.3K.

So, whats causing Bitcoins fall from grace? The prevailing sentiment is a thirst for fresh liquidity in the Bitcoin market. The buzz surrounding a potential Blackrock ETF did give Bitcoin a short-lived 20% boost, but the uncertainty around the SECs verdict has left the market in a lull.

All eyes are now on the anticipated Bitcoin halving in 2024. Historically, such events have revitalized Bitcoins momentum, but the crypto realm remains inherently unpredictable. The consensus is growing that Bitcoins resurgence is tied to the approval of the Blackrock Bitcoin ETF.

With whispers suggesting that an ETF decision might be pushed to 2024, several Bitcoin enthusiasts are exploring other opportunities. Many are gravitating toward the Everlodge presale, eager to secure tokens while theyre still affordable.

Ethereum remains a powerhouse within the DeFi arena, boasting an impressive Total Value Locked (TVL) that exceeds $20 billion across various platforms. Its foundational crypto role and robust developer resources underscore its sustained relevance.

The allure of Ethereum isnt limited to individual investors; institutional powerhouses are increasingly swayed by its capabilities, especially in the realm of smart contract development.

A buzz surrounds the potential unveiling of an Ethereum-centric ETF by Blackrock, which, if realized, would catapult Ethereum into the portfolios of a broader spectrum of investors, promising significant growth.

However, price-wise, Ethereum is wrestling with challenges. The resistance level within the $2,000 to $2,100 bracket has proven formidable. A recent slip saw Ethereums price spiralling downwards by 15% in just one day.

Coupled with this price dip, a drop in network activity and fears of substantial sell-offs have shadowed uncertainty over Ethereums trajectory. This sentiment is underscored by a staggering 50% drop in Ethereums TVL since its 2023 peak of $32 billion in April.

Amidst this backdrop, Ethereum holders are looking over their shoulders at Everlodge, a nascent blockchain project whose potential challenges Ethereums dominance. While Ethereum competes in a highly competitive atmosphere with other layer-1 platforms, Everlodge offers a unique product in the $280 trillion real estate market.

See the original post here:

Everlodge on the rise: can it match Bitcoin and Ethereum's growth? - CoinJournal

Read More..