Cloud Hosting

Figuring Out What Artificial General Intelligence Consists Of Is Enormously Vital And Mindfully On The Minds Of AI Researchers At Google DeepMind  Forbes

See original here:

Figuring Out What Artificial General Intelligence Consists Of Is Enormously Vital And Mindfully On The Minds Of AI Researchers At Google DeepMind -...

Read More..

Between the years 2018-2022, Chinese researchers have published approximately 850 studies in the field of artificial general intelligence (AGI), putting the Asian superpower at the spearhead of the field's R&D (research and development) compared to the Western world, and specifically the United States.

These numbers were gathered by researchers from the Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) at Georgetown University in the U.S. The researchers explain that China is on a path that challenges emerging norms worldwide, under which most countries are attempting to monitor and regulate research to prevent potential misuse in the future.

2 View gallery

ChatGPT against the background of the Chinese flag

(Photo: daily_creativity / Shutterstock.com)

The term "artificial general intelligence" refers to an AI system with human-level capabilities. The CSET researchers found that around 500 of the Chinese studies covered topics such as "practical AI applications" and "advanced technologies for AGI." In other words, China is actively engaging in the development of machines that can think like humans.

The American researchers say that there is no way to know what research is being conducted in China by machines or research institutions outside the capital city, which may indicate that the Chinese are pursuing more advanced programs in other locations within the country. One of these locations may be Wuhan - the same city where the coronavirus outbreak originated, according to the researchers.

In any case, the main red flag is that China seems to be taking it far past general AI research, and attempting to develop additional technologies such as human-machine interactions that would enable direct control of computers and machines through the human brain - similar to the research conducted by Neuralink, founded by Elon Musk.

It is further explained that the Chinese use researchers outside of China, although it is unclear what exactly their contribution to the research is. Nevertheless, the main chunk of research is indisputably conducted in China. Additionally, since the Chinese government may conceal its less successful studies, the investigators may be led to believe that the scope of research is much smaller than it actually is. This is a problem because it could impact competition between the West (with the U.S. on the frontline) and China, creating a "missile gap" phenomenon - an overestimation of the adversary's capabilities in a certain field, which may lead to uncontrolled development in the West, despite China potentially being far from true capabilities or technological leadership.

The researchers' conclusions are that attempts to broadly assess Chinese capabilities would result in the hiding of their efforts, turning all research worldwide into a kind of secretive strategic asset. Evidently, it would be much more difficult to publicly supervise research, because this could lead to unethical or flawed research. The researchers further recommend that American policymakers understand the strategic importance of AGI, as well as its limitations, while striving to be the first to obtain the technology. In other words, the U.S. should not arbitrarily restrict research in the West, but rather allow for some flexibility in the ethical, legal, societal, and moral rules governing those engaged in the field.

Link:

China takes the lead in AI research, prompting concerns over global competition - Ynetnews

Read More..

Illustration by the author with components created via Midjourney

The unveiling of Q-Star AIs astonishing capabilities and the unexpected departure of CEO Sam Altman have sent shockwaves through the AI community.

Q-Star AI has showcased remarkable mathematical prowess, rivaling the problem-solving abilities of elementary school students. Its ability to navigate complex mathematical challenges with definitive answers has sparked speculation about its potential as a significant stride towards achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Furthermore, Q-Star AIs logical reasoning abilities have implications beyond the realm of mathematics, with potential applications in scientific research and complex decision-making processes.

However, the recent dismissal of CEO Sam Altman by the board of directors has added a layer of suspense to the unfolding saga. Altman, a key figure in OpenAIs journey, had hinted at breakthroughs in AGI and unveiled new tools.

As the drama surrounding Q-Star AI continues to captivate the AI community, the balance between its astonishing capabilities and the undisclosed risks it may pose to humanity remains a topic of intense interest and debate.

The pursuit of AGI stands at the forefront of innovation and risk assessment.

Q-Star AIs exceptional mathematical prowess surpasses that of elementary school students, showcasing its remarkable capabilities in solving complex mathematical challenges. With its unrivaled ability to navigate mathematical problems, Q-Star AI takes a significant stride towards achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

This astonishing feat holds profound implications for real-world problems, particularly in scientific research and complex decision-making processes. Q-Star AIs application of logical reasoning to decipher complex equations opens doors to new possibilities and advancements.

However, it is important to address the veiled risks associated with Q-Star AI. While it exhibits unprecedented cognitive abilities, concerns about potential risks to humanity cannot be ignored. This dichotomy of capabilities and risks adds complexity to the narrative surrounding Q-Star AI, making it a subject of ongoing fascination and anticipation within the AI community.

The recent unexpected departure of CEO Sam Altman further intensifies the drama, leaving the future of Q-Star AI and its groundbreaking breakthrough uncertain.

The application of Q-Star AIs logical reasoning and problem-solving abilities to real-world problems holds significant implications for various fields. Its remarkable capabilities in applying logical reasoning could revolutionize scientific research, enabling the deciphering of complex equations and the exploration of intricate phenomena.

Furthermore, Q-Star AIs reasoning abilities have the potential to aid in complex decision-making processes, providing valuable insights and optimizing outcomes in industries such as finance, healthcare, and logistics. By harnessing Q-Star AIs cognitive prowess, researchers and professionals can unlock new possibilities and achieve unprecedented levels of efficiency and accuracy.

However, it is crucial to approach these implications with caution, as the undisclosed risks associated with Q-Star AIs advancement must be carefully assessed and mitigated. Balancing the immense potential and potential risks will be paramount in harnessing the power of Q-Star AI for the betterment of humanity.

A letter from OpenAI researchers to the board of directors hinted at both significant capabilities and potential risks of the groundbreaking Q-Star AI.

The veiled risks associated with Q-Star AI demand careful consideration, as they pose considerable threats to humanitys well-being and progress. These risks include:

It is crucial to approach the development and deployment of Q-Star AI with a cautious and responsible mindset, ensuring that the benefits outweigh the potential risks.

Amidst the unfolding narrative of groundbreaking breakthroughs, the unexpected departure of CEO Sam Altman has added a layer of intrigue and uncertainty to the Q-Star AI saga.

Altman, a key figure in OpenAIs journey, was dismissed from his position by the board, leaving the AI community in anticipation. Altmans tenure was marked by the unveiling of new tools and hints at breakthroughs in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

His sudden exit raises questions about the future direction of Q-Star AI and the potential impact on its progress towards AGI. The departure of a prominent leader such as Altman introduces an element of suspense and casts a shadow of doubt over the path that Q-Star AI will now take.

Continuing the unfolding narrative of groundbreaking breakthroughs, the ongoing drama surrounding Q-Star AI continues to captivate the AI community. As anticipation builds, the power-hungry audience is eagerly awaiting the next chapter in this gripping saga.

Here are four key elements that contribute to the drama and anticipation surrounding Q-Star AI:

As the story unfolds, the AI community anxiously awaits further revelations, eager to witness the culmination of Q-Star AIs astonishing capabilities and the resolution of the ongoing drama.

The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has become a paramount objective in the field of AI, as researchers and innovators strive to develop a machine that can mimic the cognitive capabilities of a human being.

The quest for AGI represents an unparalleled opportunity to wield immense power and influence over technological advancements. AGI holds the potential to revolutionize industries, solve complex problems, and unlock unprecedented levels of productivity. It is the ultimate manifestation of human intelligence, encapsulating the ability to reason, learn, and adapt in any given situation.

The pursuit of AGI is not only a testament to human ambition but also a testament to the desire for power and control over the future of technology. As researchers push the boundaries of AI, the race for AGI intensifies, with each breakthrough bringing us closer to a future where machines possess the cognitive prowess of human beings.

In conclusion, Q-Star AIs remarkable mathematical abilities and logical reasoning have generated significant excitement and anticipation in the AI community.

The unexpected departure of CEO Sam Altman adds a layer of intrigue to the unfolding story.

As the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence continues, it is crucial to carefully consider the potential risks and implications of such advancements.

The balance between astonishing capabilities and undisclosed dangers remains a pertinent topic of debate and research.

Here is the original post:

Q-Star AI's Astonishing Capabilities and CEO's Dismissal: When Man Meets Machine - Medium

Read More..

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to developing computer systems that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. These tasks include learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, speech recognition, and language understanding. AI aims to create machines that mimic human cognitive functions and adapt to different situations.

artiba

1. Ubiquity in Technology:

- AI is becoming increasingly integrated into various technologies and industries, from virtual assistants on our smartphones to advanced robotics in manufacturing. Understanding AI basics is crucial as it becomes a pervasive part of our daily lives.

2. Career Opportunities:

datacamp

- Many industries are incorporating AI, creating a demand for professionals with AI skills. Learning AI basics can open up diverse career opportunities in data science, machine learning, and robotics.

3. Innovation and Problem-Solving:

- AI is a powerful tool for innovation and problem-solving. Knowing the basics allows individuals to leverage AI to develop solutions to complex challenges in diverse domains, including healthcare, finance, and transportation.

4. Data Analysis and Interpretation:

Unsplash

- With the growing volume of data, AI plays a crucial role in analyzing and interpreting information. Learning AI basics helps individuals make sense of large datasets, extract valuable insights, and make data-driven decisions.

5. Automation and Efficiency:

- AI enables automation, streamlining repetitive tasks and increasing efficiency. Understanding AI basics allows individuals to contribute to developing and implementing automated processes in various industries.

6. Enhanced User Experience:

- Many applications and services use AI to personalize user experiences. Whether it's content recommendations, voice recognition, or chatbots, AI enhances user interactions, making it essential for individuals to grasp the basics for creating user-centric technologies.

7. Ethical Considerations:

- As AI technologies advance, ethical considerations become more critical. Learning AI basics empowers individuals to engage in discussions about the ethical use of AI, ensuring that its deployment aligns with societal values and norms.

8. Global Impact:

- AI has the potential to address global challenges, including healthcare, climate change, and poverty. Understanding AI basics equips individuals to contribute to and engage in discussions around the responsible and beneficial use of AI globally.

getty

A - Abductive Logic Programming (ALP):

- A knowledge-representation framework in AI that uses abductive reasoning principles to solve problems by seeking answers simply and straightforwardly.

B - Backward Chaining:

- A method where AI models start with a desired output and work backward to find supporting data.

C - Chatbot:

- A program designed for one-on-one conversations using natural language processing, mimicking human discussions.

D - Deep Learning:

- The process where an AI model imitates human brain functions, learning through structured data points.

F - Forward Chaining:

- A method where an AI model works with a given problem to find a solution by analyzing relevant data sets.

G - Artificial General Intelligence (AGI):

- A theoretical concept referring to AI systems that can surpass human cognitive abilities in various tasks.

H - Hyperparameter:

- Manually set values affecting how AI models learn.

I - AI Accelerator:

- A hardware chip or micro-processor designed for general-purpose AI applications, used for training models or in more extensive neural networks.

M - Machine Learning:

- A branch of AI focused on creating algorithms enabling AI models to learn and interact with new data without human involvement.

N - Neural Network:

- An extensive computer network designed to mimic a human brain, used for computations and AI model training.

NLG and NLP - Natural Language Generation and Processing:

- The ability of AI to understand and decipher human language, analyzing data to output text or speech in a comprehensible language.

P - Pattern Recognition:

- A field within AI dealing with finding and decoding similar patterns or trends in data.

Predictive Analysis:

- An AI model can decipher data points and output detailed analytics and predictions.

R - Reinforcement Learning:

- A teaching method by encouraging AI to find answers without set parameters, improving based on human-graded output.

T - Turing Test:

- A test devised by Alan Turing to evaluate if AI can pass itself off as a human in various fields.

W - Weak AI:

- A narrowly developed AI model for specific tasks commonly seen in today's AI applications.

Learning the basics of AI is essential today due to its widespread application, influence on various industries, career opportunities, and potential to drive innovation and address complex challenges.

Unsplash

As AI continues to evolve, having a foundational understanding allows individuals to navigate and actively participate in the AI-driven world.

For more trending stories, follow us onTelegram.

See more here:

Cracking The Code: Understanding The A-Z Basics Of Artificial Intelligence - Indiatimes.com

Read More..

The Washington Post

Exclusive

Updated December 8, 2023 at 5:18 p.m. EST|Published December 8, 2023 at 2:43 p.m. EST

This fall, a small number of senior leaders approached the board of OpenAI with concerns about chief executive Sam Altman.

Altman a revered mentor, prodigious start-up investor and avatar of the AI revolution had been psychologically abusive, the employees alleged, creating pockets of chaos and delays at the artificial-intelligence start-up, according to two people familiar with the boards thinking who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal matters. The company leaders, a group that included key figures and people who manage large teams, mentioned Altmans allegedly pitting employees against each other in unhealthy ways, the people said.

Although the board members didnt use the language of abuse to describe Altmans behavior, these complaints echoed some of their interactions with Altman over the years, and they had already been debating the boards ability to hold the CEO accountable. Several board members thought Altman had lied to them, for example, as part of a campaign to remove board member Helen Toner after she published a paper criticizing OpenAI, the people said.

The new complaints triggered a review of Altmans conduct during which the board weighed the devotion Altman had cultivated among factions of the company against the risk that OpenAI could lose key leaders who found interacting with him highly toxic. They also considered reports from several employees who said they feared retaliation from Altman: One told the board that Altman was hostile after the employee shared critical feedback with the CEO and that he undermined the employee on that persons team, the people said.

It is clear that there were real misunderstandings between me and members of the board, Altman wrote on X. For my part, it is incredibly important to learn from this experience and apply those learnings as we move forward as a company.

The complaints about Altmans alleged behavior, which have not previously been reported, were a major factor in the boards abrupt decision to fire Altman on Nov. 17, according to the people. Initially cast as a clash over the safe development of artificial intelligence, Altmans firing was at least partially motivated by the sense that his behavior would make it impossible for the board to oversee the CEO.

Altman was reinstated as CEO five days later, after employees released a letter signed by a large percentage of OpenAIs 800-person staff, including most senior managers, and threatening mass resignations.

We believe Sam is the best leader for OpenAI, said company spokesperson Hannah Wong. The senior leadership team was unanimous in asking for Sams return as CEO and for the boards resignation, actions backed by an open letter signed by over 95% of our employees.

Anna Makanju, OpenAIs vice president of global affairs, who signed the letter, echoed the sentiment in a statement shared by the company: In my experience working closely with Sam, he brings passion to the work and to the mission. While he has strong opinions, he values my teams counsel, listens to diverse perspectives, and consistently encourages open and honest discussions.

Now back at the helm of OpenAI, Altman may find that the company is less united than the waves of heart emojis that greeted his return on social media might suggest.

Some employees said Altmans camp began undermining the boards decision shortly after he was removed as CEO, the people said. Within hours, messages dismissed the board as illegitimate and decried Altmans firing as a coup by OpenAI co-founder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, according to the people.

On social media, in news reports and on the anonymous app Blind, which requires members to sign up with a work email address to post, people identified as current OpenAI employees also described facing intense peer pressure to sign the mass-resignation letter.

Some OpenAI employees have rejected the idea that there was any coercion to sign the letter. Half the company had signed between the hours of 2 and 3am, a member of OpenAIs technical staff, who tweets under the pseudonym roon, posted on X. Thats not something that can be accomplished by peer pressure.

Joanne Jang, who works in products at OpenAI, tweeted that no influence had been at play. The google doc broke so people texted each other at 2-2:30 am begging people with write access to type their name.

For longtime employees, there was added incentive to sign: Altmans departure jeopardized an investment deal that would allow them to sell their stock back to OpenAI, cashing out equity without waiting for the company to go public. The deal led by Joshua Kushners Thrive Capital values the company at almost $90 billion, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal, more than triple its $28 billion valuation in April, and it could have been threatened by tanking value triggered by the CEOs departure.

Members of the board expected employees to be upset about Altmans firing, but they were taken aback when OpenAIs management team appeared united in their support for bringing him back, said the people, as well as a third person with knowledge of the boards proceedings, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive company matters.

As the company seeks to rebuild the board and smooth things over with Microsoft, its key partner, it has committed to launching an internal investigation into the debacle, which broke into public view on the Friday before Thanksgiving.

In a post on the company blog, the board wrote that Altman had been removed as CEO after a review found that he had not been consistently candid in his communications. The Washington Post previously reported that the boards vote was triggered by a pattern of manipulation and rooted in Altmans attempts to avoid checks on his power at OpenAI.

Altman himself helped pioneer OpenAIs unique board structure, according to a person familiar with the board proceedings at the time. The group has had as many as nine members and is supposed to contain a majority of members with no financial stake in OpenAI. At the time of Altmans firing, it was down to six members: three employees (president and co-founder Greg Brockman, Altman, and Sutskever) and three independent directors (Toner, tech entrepreneur Tasha McCauley and Quora CEO Adam DAngelo).

But the lack of concrete details around the boards motivations allowed room for speculation and spin to take hold. Some talk focused on Sutskever, who in July was named co-lead of a new AI safety team called Superalignment, whose goal is to make sure advanced AI systems follow human intent. His public comments about the potential dangers of artificial general intelligence set the stage for a narrative about the risks of commercial interests.

The pressure on Sutskever to reverse his vote was particularly intense. Less than three days later, he wrote on X that I deeply regret participating in the boards decision. He also added his name to the employee resignation letter and vowed to reunite the company.

Altman seemed to approve, quoting Sutskevers message on X along with a trio of red heart emojis.

Sutskevers future at OpenAI is now uncertain. We hope to continue our working relationship and are discussing how [Sutskever] can continue his work at OpenAI, Altman wrote in a staff-wide email after returning as CEO.

There have been a lot of wild and inaccurate reports about what happened with the Board but the bottom line is that Ilya has very publicly stated that Sam is the right person to lead OpenAI and he is thrilled that he is back at the helm, Sutskevers lawyer, Alex Weingarten, chair of the litigation practice at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, wrote in a statement.

On Wednesday morning, Sutskever shared a cryptic post on X about learning many lessons in the past month. One such lesson is that the phrase the beatings will continue until morale improves applies more often than it has any right to, he wrote. The tweet was quickly deleted.

clarification

This story has been updated to clarify that "roon" is a pseudonym used by a member of OpenAI's technical staff, not a Twitter handle.

See the original post here:

Warning from OpenAI leaders helped trigger Sam Altmans ouster - The Washington Post

Read More..