Page 4,397«..1020..4,3964,3974,3984,399..4,4104,420..»

Internet Security Firm Confirms WikiLeaks ‘Vault 7’ At Least 40 Cyberattacks Tied to the CIA – The Ring of Fire Network

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

According to a blog posted Monday, internet security giant Symantec has linked real-world cyberattacks to the tools detailed in the Vault 7 WikiLeaks dump.

Since 2011, Symantec has tracked a group they called Longhorn, that used sophisticated software exploits against organizations that would be of interest to a nation-state attacker. The blog post never specifically mentions the CIA, instead assessing that the Longhorn group exhibited behavior which is consistent with state-sponsored groups and that there were indicators that Longhorn was from an English-speaking, North American country. Longhorn even used SCOOBYSNACK as a code word in their malware.

Symantec says that they found that the group infected 40 targets in at least 16 countries across the globe:

Longhorn has infiltrated governments and internationally operating organizations, in addition to targets in the financial, telecoms, energy, aerospace, information technology, education, and natural resources sectors.

To tie the WikiLeaks information to their investigation of Longhorn, Symantec found that the software detailed in Vault 7 followed a development timeline that they saw in real-world scenarios. One piece of software known as Corentry to Symantec and referred to as Fluxwire by WikiLeaks provided particularly compellingevidence:

New features in Corentry consistently appeared in samples obtained by Symantec either on the same date listed in the Vault 7 document or several days later, leaving little doubt that Corentry is the malware described in the leaked document.

Symantecs investigation found that the attacks were carried out across the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and Africa. On one occasion a computer in the United States was compromised but, following infection, an uninstaller was launched within hours, which may indicate this victim was infected unintentionally. According to Reuters, Symantec did not track any mass surveillance tools and all of the targets held national security value. However, Symantecs Eric Chien told Reuters that,

there are organizations in there that people would be surprised were targets.

Symantecs Stephen Doherty told Wired that they had been tracking the Longhorn group for many years, but Vault 7 was key in pin-pointing their identity. [T]he tools and activity we had been tracking from Longhorn closely match some of the information disclosed in Vault 7, said Doherty.

Symantecs efforts mark the first real-world example of the Vault 7 tools being used. However Doherty said that they have not yet found additional links:

We track a lot of groups and a lot of actors and we havent seen any specific details that would link to any other malware at the moment.

While the CIA understandably denies the authenticity of the tools and documents contained in Vault 7, the government has attempted to blockthe leaks from being admitted into court cases because they should be considered classified. That action, paired with expert analysis by industry leaders like Symantec, shows that the WikiLeaks collection is likely real.

See original here:
Internet Security Firm Confirms WikiLeaks 'Vault 7' At Least 40 Cyberattacks Tied to the CIA - The Ring of Fire Network

Read More..
Posted in Internet Security | Leave a Comment

Disk encryption – Wikipedia

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Disk encryption is a technology which protects information by converting it into unreadable code that cannot be deciphered easily by unauthorized people. Disk encryption uses disk encryption software or hardware to encrypt every bit of data that goes on a disk or disk volume. Disk encryption prevents unauthorized access to data storage.

Expressions full disk encryption (FDE) or whole disk encryption signify that everything on disk is encrypted, but the master boot record (MBR), or similar area of a bootable disk, with code that starts the operating system loading sequence, is not encrypted. Some hardware-based full disk encryption systems can truly encrypt an entire boot disk, including the MBR.

Transparent encryption, also known as real-time encryption and on-the-fly encryption (OTFE), is a method used by some disk encryption software. "Transparent" refers to the fact that data is automatically encrypted or decrypted as it is loaded or saved.

With transparent encryption, the files are accessible immediately after the key is provided, and the entire volume is typically mounted as if it were a physical drive, making the files just as accessible as any unencrypted ones. No data stored on an encrypted volume can be read (decrypted) without using the correct password/keyfile(s) or correct encryption keys. The entire file system within the volume is encrypted (including file names, folder names, file contents, and other meta-data).[1]

To be transparent to the end user, transparent encryption usually requires the use of device drivers to enable the encryption process. Although administrator access rights are normally required to install such drivers, encrypted volumes can typically be used by normal users without these rights .[2]

In general, every method in which data is transparently encrypted on write and decrypted on read can be called transparent encryption.

Disk encryption does not replace file encryption in all situations. Disk encryption is sometimes used in conjunction with filesystem-level encryption with the intention of providing a more secure implementation. Since disk encryption generally uses the same key for encrypting the whole volume, all data is decryptable when the system runs. However, some disk encryption solutions use multiple keys for encrypting different partitions. If an attacker gains access to the computer at run-time, the attacker has access to all files. Conventional file and folder encryption instead allows different keys for different portions of the disk. Thus an attacker cannot extract information from still-encrypted files and folders.

Unlike disk encryption, filesystem-level encryption does not typically encrypt filesystem metadata, such as the directory structure, file names, modification timestamps or sizes.

Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is a secure cryptoprocessor embedded in the motherboard that can be used to authenticate a hardware device. Since each TPM chip is unique to a particular device, it is capable of performing platform authentication. It can be used to verify that the system seeking the access is the expected system.

A limited number of disk encryption solutions have support for TPM. These implementations can wrap the decryption key using the TPM, thus tying the hard disk drive (HDD) to a particular device. If the HDD is removed from that particular device and placed in another, the decryption process will fail. Recovery is possible with the decryption password or token.

Although this has the advantage that the disk cannot be removed from the device, it might create a single point of failure in the encryption. For example, if something happens to the TPM or the motherboard, a user would not be able to access the data by connecting the hard drive to another computer, unless that user has a separate recovery key.

There are multiple tools available in the market that allow for disk encryption. However, they vary greatly in features and security. They are divided into three main categories: software-based, hardware-based within the storage device, and hardware-based elsewhere (such as CPU or host bus adaptor). Hardware-based full disk encryption within the storage device are called self-encrypting drives and have no impact on performance whatsoever. Furthermore, the media-encryption key never leaves the device itself and is therefore not available to any virus in the operating system.

The Trusted Computing Group Opal drive provides industry accepted standardization for self-encrypting drives. External hardware is considerably faster than the software-based solutions although CPU versions may still have a performance impact, and the media encryption keys are not as well protected.

All solutions for the boot drive require a Pre-Boot Authentication component which is available for all types of solutions from a number of vendors. It is important in all cases that the authentication credentials are usually a major potential weakness since the symmetric cryptography is usually strong.

Secure and safe recovery mechanisms are essential to the large-scale deployment of any disk encryption solutions in an enterprise. The solution must provide an easy but secure way to recover passwords (most importantly data) in case the user leaves the company without notice or forgets the password.

Challenge/Response password recovery mechanism allows the password to be recovered in a secure manner. It is offered by a limited number of disk encryption solutions.

Some benefits of challenge/response password recovery:

An Emergency Recovery Information (ERI) file provides an alternative for recovery if a challenge response mechanism is unfeasible due to the cost of helpdesk operatives for small companies or implementation challenges.

Some benefits of ERI file recovery:

Most full disk encryption schemes are vulnerable to a cold boot attack, whereby encryption keys can be stolen by cold-booting a machine already running an operating system, then dumping the contents of memory before the data disappears. The attack relies on the data remanence property of computer memory, whereby data bits can take up to several minutes to degrade after power has been removed.[3] Even a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is not effective against the attack, as the operating system needs to hold the decryption keys in memory in order to access the disk.[3]

Full disk encryption is also vulnerable when a computer is stolen when suspended. As wake-up does not involve a BIOS boot sequence, it typically does not ask for the FDE password. Hibernation, in contrast goes via a BIOS boot sequence, and is safe.

All software-based encryption systems are vulnerable to various side channel attacks such as acoustic cryptanalysis and hardware keyloggers. In contrast, self-encrypting drives are not vulnerable to these attacks since the hardware encryption key never leaves the disk controller.

Also, all of full disk encryption schemes don't protect from tampering (or silent data corruption, i.e. bitrot). That means they only provides privacy, not integrity. Block cipher-based encryption modes used for full disk encryption are not authenticated encryption themselves because of concerns of the storage overhead needed for authentication tags. Thus, if tampering would be done to data on the disk, the data would be decrypted to garbled random data when read and hopefully errors may be indicated depending on which data is tampered (for the case of file system metadata by the OS; for the case of file data by the corresponding program to process the file). To protect from these concerns, file systems with full data integrity via checksums (like Btrfs or ZFS) must be used on top of full disk encryption.

Full disk encryption has several benefits compared to regular file or folder encryption, or encrypted vaults. The following are some benefits of disk encryption:

One issue to address in full disk encryption is that the blocks where the operating system is stored must be decrypted before the OS can boot, meaning that the key has to be available before there is a user interface to ask for a password. Most Full Disk Encryption solutions utilize Pre-Boot Authentication by loading a small, highly secure operating system which is strictly locked down and hashed versus system variables to check for the integrity of the Pre-Boot kernel. Some implementations such as BitLocker Drive Encryption can make use of hardware such as a Trusted Platform Module to ensure the integrity of the boot environment, and thereby frustrate attacks that target the boot loader by replacing it with a modified version. This ensures that authentication can take place in a controlled environment without the possibility of a bootkit being used to subvert the pre-boot decryption.

With a Pre-Boot Authentication environment, the key used to encrypt the data is not decrypted until an external key is input into the system.

Solutions for storing the external key include:

All these possibilities have varying degrees of security; however, most are better than an unencrypted disk.

Here is the original post:
Disk encryption - Wikipedia

Read More..
Posted in Encryption | Leave a Comment

Lawmaker Pushes Bill That Requires Encryption by Pennsylvania State Employees – Government Technology

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

(TNS)-- State employees would be required to use encryption to guard work material containing sensitive data under legislation being offered by Rep. Rob Matzie.

Matzies Protecting Commonwealth Data bill, House Bill 1325, would protect Pennsylvanians by requiring that state employees use encryption when transmitting Social Security numbers, drivers license numbers, financial information and other sensitive data, he said in a statement Thursday.

My common-sense measure would help make transactions with the state safer by curtailing the use of nonsecure internet connections, said Matzie, D-16, Ambridge.

Matzies bill joins others introduced by House Democrats, including Washington County state Rep. Brandon Neuman, after the Republican-controlled Congress recently rolled back internet privacy regulations.

Currently, Pennsylvania does not require state employees to use encryption, said Matzie, who warned that this lax defensive programming could create a security gap that could be exploited.

Matzie introduced similar legislation in 2014, but it failed to receive a House floor vote after unanimously being moved out of the House Consumer Affairs Committee.

In his statement, Matzie referred to hacking cases involving government bodies, including the state Senate, that make it clear that Pennsylvania must take measures to protect consumers privacy.

The recent federal action has forced states to push for safeguards, and a host of bills are being crafted or introduced all over the country to solidify consumer protections, he said.

Neuman, D-48, North Strabane Township, also announced Thursday that he is drafting legislation to require internet service providers to obtain permission from customers before storing, sharing or selling sensitive personal information.

His soon-to-be House Bill 1321 would restore those protections by the Federal Communications Commission that were eliminated by Congress.

Citizens deserve a say on if, when and how their personal, online information, such as Social Security numbers and health information, is used or sold, Neuman said in a prepared release. Citizens are not cyber-serfs whose online privacy is available for the taking by the highest bidder.

Neumans bill would require internet service providers receive permission to sell consumers information, such as minute-to-minute locations, health and financial data, and web browsing and app usage histories.

It would also allow consumers to opt-out of having their nonsensitive information shared and prohibit internet service providers, commonly referred to as ISPs, from denying service to customers who choose not to have their information sold.

2017 the Beaver County Times (Beaver, Pa.) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Read the original:
Lawmaker Pushes Bill That Requires Encryption by Pennsylvania State Employees - Government Technology

Read More..
Posted in Encryption | Leave a Comment

Encryption on the Rise in Age of Cloud – Infosecurity Magazine – Infosecurity Magazine

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

How trustworthy is your cloud provider?

Thats the question many security personnel ask themselves, as cloud adoption continues apace. According to Thales 2017 Global Encryption Trends Study (carried out by Ponemon Institute), enterprises have accelerated adoption of encryption strategies in response to cloud adoption, with 41%of respondents saying their organization has an encryption strategy applied consistently across the enterprise.

About 67% of respondents take one of two routes: they either perform encryption on premise prior to sending data to the cloud, or encrypt in the cloud using keys they generate and manage on premises. But a full 37% said their organizations turn over complete control of keys and encryption processes to the cloud providers themselves.

Other critical findings demonstrate organizations continue to show a preference for control over encryption and key management when those activities migrate to the cloud. About a third (31%) are using or planning to use hardware security modules (HSMs) with bring your own key (BYOK) deployments, with 20% claiming the same for cloud access security broker (CASB) deployments.

Use of HSMs among organizations grew to its highest level ever, at 38%; of those respondents, 48% own and operate HSMs on-premise in support of cloud-based applications. Overall, usage of HSMs with CASBs is expected to double in the next 12 months (from 12% to 24%).

Also, for the first time in the studys 12-year history, business unit leaders have a higher influence over encryption strategy than IT operations.

This years findings align with key trends demonstrating an increased reliance on the cloud, ever-evolving internal and external threats, and new data sources mandating stronger protection, said John Grimm, senior director of security strategy at Thales e-Security. The survey further reinforces that cloud key management offerings are more important than everand business-leader involvement is crucial to a sound security strategy.

And no wonder: At 55%, compliance is the top driver for encryptionfollowed closely by protecting enterprise intellectual property (51%), customer information protection (49%) and protection from external threats (49%).

The accelerated growth of encryption strategies in business underscores the proliferation of mega-breaches and cyberattacks, as well as the need to protect a broadening range of sensitive data types, said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. Simply put, the stakes are too high for organizations to stand by and wait for an attack to happen to them before introducing a sophisticated data protection strategy. Encryption and key management continue to play critical roles in these strategies.

Originally posted here:
Encryption on the Rise in Age of Cloud - Infosecurity Magazine - Infosecurity Magazine

Read More..
Posted in Encryption | Leave a Comment

Hewlett Packard Enterprise touts encryption tool for federal clients – The Hill

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Hewlett Packard Enterprise on Thursday announced that it has developed the first format-preserving encryption tool that meets federal government standards for use by agencies and government contractors.

The companys data security branch has been engaging with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for several years to validate the encryption tool.

Format-preserving encryption maintains the format of the datas original text meaning that, for example, a 16-digit credit card number would be encrypted so that the output is another 16-digit number.

The encryption tool fits into Hewlett Packards data security product, called HPE SecureData, which has already been used in the private sector to secure banking records and other types of sensitive information.

Mark Bower, global director of product management at the company's data security branch, told The Hill that the product could have profound implications for government agencies and contractors trying to secure sensitive data from criminal and nation-state hackers.

The technology itself allows an organization to essentially go back in and retrofit or build in security or data privacy not only into the new applications they might be moving into [like] the cloud, but also in those highly-prized mission-critical [or] legacy systems that often are the backbone of government data processing, Bower said.

The ability to encrypt the data and keep the data useful when its encrypted means that you can essentially retrofit encryption into a lot of applications and processes and then do that without the heavy cost burden of traditional encryption, Bower said.

Information security in federal government systems has been a prime concern in the wake of the Office of Personnel Management breach, which compromised personal information of more than 20 million people and has been largely blamed on the agencys legacy systems. The breach was traced back to Chinese hackers.

Bower said that the company has already seen interest in the technology by U.S. federal agencies as well as other public organizations in other countries.

Here is the original post:
Hewlett Packard Enterprise touts encryption tool for federal clients - The Hill

Read More..
Posted in Encryption | Leave a Comment

SHA-1 Encryption Has Been Broken: Now What? – Forbes

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Forbes
SHA-1 Encryption Has Been Broken: Now What?
Forbes
In February 2017, Google and CWI announced they had broken SHA-1 encryption. This isn't a surprise: The encryption, used for things like digital signatures, had been susceptible to collisions for years. Companies began slowly phasing out SHA-1 after ...

More here:
SHA-1 Encryption Has Been Broken: Now What? - Forbes

Read More..
Posted in Encryption | Leave a Comment

Bitcoin Wallet Review Exodus – The Merkle

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Summary

Exodus is a versatile and user-friendly multi-currency wallet solution. However, there is a lack of customization features that may turn off some people. It is still well worth checking out, though, as the built-in exchange feature is quite nifty.

In the world of bitcoin and cryptocurrency, there are quite a few different services people enjoy using. While exchanges are among the most popular services, there are over a dozen bitcoin wallets available as well. Exodus is one of those cryptocurrency wallets many people seem to like, even though it is hardly ever mentioned. Now would be a good time to take a closer look at what this wallet offers and why so many people have taken a liking to it.

Although it is difficult to distinguish oneself from the competition as a cryptocurrency wallet service provider these days, Exodus tries to do a few things differently. First of all, the wallet does not just support bitcoin, as it also integrates ETH, LTC, Dash, and Dogecoin support. Contrary to what some people may think, there is still a large demand for dogecoin wallet services these days.

Supporting multiple digital currencies is not enough to stand out among competitors, though. Exodus positions itself as a convenient wallet solution through its appealing user interface. In fact, one could argue anyone in the world can get comfortable using Exodus within minutes, regardless of any prior experience with cryptocurrency wallet solutions. In this regard, Exodus is a wallet option for both novice and experienced cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

Moreover, the user interface will also create a pie chart based on a users holdings. This feature is well appreciated by a lot of users so far, as it provides an interesting visual of their cryptocurrency holdings. Moreover, the wallet also provides a built-in exchange, which allows for instant trading between the five supported currencies. A nifty feature, that much is certain. The exchange feature is made possible due to the integration of the ShapeShift API.

That does not mean the wallet is not without its flaws, though. One feature that would make Exodus more worthwhile is having the option to control several wallet addresses per supported currency. For example, it is not possible to have both a regular bitcoin address and a watch-only address in the same client. That is a big let-down for a lot of users, although it is something the developers can easily fix in a future update.

Moreover, it may require a bit of work to display the total value of all cryptocurrency holdings in a currency other than the US Dollar. Customization is a critical part of any cryptocurrency wallet in existence, and Exodus may need a bit more work in this department. Do keep in mind the wallet itself functions just fine, yet non Americans may want to display their portfolio value in a different national currency.

All things considered, the Exodus cryptocurrency wallet is quite a popular solution for both experienced and novice users. Some further customization options are more than welcome, although there is no reason to believe they will not be added in a future client update. The built-in exchange feature has been received by the overall community so far, that much is certain. It is worth mentioning Exodus is only available for desktop users, as there is no mobile client available as of right now.

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.

See the original post:
Bitcoin Wallet Review Exodus - The Merkle

Read More..
Posted in Bitcoin | Leave a Comment

Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Research …

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Table of Contents

Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Research Report 2017 1 Methodology/Research Approach 1.1 Research Programs/Design 1.2 Market Size Estimation 1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation 2 Data Source 2.1 Secondary Sources 2.2 Primary Sources 3 Disclaimer 1 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Overview (Page -35) 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain 1.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Segment by Types (Product Category) 1.2.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate (%) Comparison by Types (Product Category) (2016-2022) 1.2.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) by Types (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Bitcoin (BTC) 1.2.4 Ether (ETH) 1.2.5 Litecoin (LTC) 1.2.6 Ripple 1.2.7 Peercoin 1.2.8 Dogecoin 1.2.9 Namecoin 1.3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Segment by Applications 1.3.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Comparison by Applications (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Transaction 1.3.3 Investment 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market by Regions (2012-2022) 1.4.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) Comparison by Regions (2012-2022) 1.4.2 United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain (2012-2022) 1.5.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 1.5.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units) Status and Outlook (2012-2022) 2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Competition by Manufacturers (Page -50) 2.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.1.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity (K Units) and Share (%) by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.1.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Share (%) by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Average Price by Manufacturers (2012-2017) 2.4 Manufacturers Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area, Product Types 2.5 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Share (%) of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output, Revenue by Regions (Page -55) 3.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity and Market Share by Regions (2012-2017) 3.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output and Market Share by Regions (2012-2017) 3.3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2012-2017) 3.4 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 3.5 United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 3.6 EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 3.7 China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 3.8 Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 3.9 South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 3.10 Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 4 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Supply (Output), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (Page -59) 4.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption by Regions (2012-2017) 4.2 United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017) 4.3 EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017) 4.4 China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017) 4.5 Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017) 4.6 South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017) 4.7 Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017) 5 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Price Trend by Types (Page -64) 5.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Market Share (%) by Types (2012-2017) 5.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Market Share (%) by Types (2012-2017) 5.3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Price (USD/Unit) by Type (2012-2017) 5.4 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth (%) by Type (2012-2017) 6 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Analysis by Applications (Page -73) 6.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption and Market Share by Applications (2012-2017) 6.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Growth Rate by Applications (2012-2017) 7 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis (Page -110) 7.1 ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Coinsecure 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 Coinsecure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Coinbase 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 Coinbase Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Bitstamp Ltd. 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Product A 7.4.2.2 Product A 7.4.3 Bitstamp Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Litecoin 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Product A 7.5.2.2 Product B 7.5.3 Litecoin Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Poloniex Inc 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Product A 7.6.2.2 Product B 7.6.3 Poloniex Inc Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 BitFury Group Limited 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Product A 7.7.2.2 Product B 7.7.3 BitFury Group Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 Unocoin Technologies Private Limited 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Product A 7.8.2.2 Product B 7.8.3 Unocoin Technologies Private Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 Ripple 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Product A 7.9.2.2 Product B 7.9.3 Ripple Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 OKEX Fintech Company Limited 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Type A 7.10.2.2 Type B 7.10.3 OKEX Fintech Company Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 Bitfinex 8 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Manufacturing Cost Analysis (Page -116) 8.1 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Key Raw Materials Analysis 8.1.1 Key Raw Materials 8.1.2 Price Trend of Key Raw Materials 8.1.3 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials 8.1.4 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials 8.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure 8.2.1 Raw Materials 8.2.2 Labor Cost 8.2.3 Manufacturing Expenses 8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers (Page -121) 9.1 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Industrial Chain Analysis 9.2 Upstream Raw Materials Sourcing 9.3 Raw Materials Sources of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Major Manufacturers in 2016 9.4 Downstream Buyers 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders (Page -124) 10.1 Marketing Channel 10.1.1 Direct Marketing 10.1.2 Indirect Marketing 10.1.3 Marketing Channel Development Trend 10.2 Market Positioning 10.2.1 Pricing Strategy 10.2.2 Brand Strategy 10.2.3 Target Client 10.3 Distributors/Traders List 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis (Page -126) 11.1 Technology Progress/Risk 11.1.1 Substitutes Threat 11.1.2 Technology Progress in Related Industry 11.2 Consumer Needs/Customer Preference Change 11.3 Economic/Political Environmental Change 12 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Forecast (Page -135) 12.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output, Revenue Forecast (2017-2022) 12.1.1 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units) and Growth Rate (%) Forecast (2017-2022) 12.1.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) 12.1.3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Price and Trend Forecast (2017-2022) 12.2 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import and Export Forecast by Regions (2017-2022) 12.2.1 United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Consumption, Export and Import Forecast (2017-2022) 12.2.2 EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Consumption, Export and Import Forecast (2017-2022) 12.2.3 China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Consumption, Export and Import Forecast (2017-2022) 12.2.4 Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Consumption, Export and Import Forecast (2017-2022) 12.2.5 South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Consumption, Export and Import Forecast (2017-2022) 12.2.6 Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue, Consumption, Export and Import Forecast (2017-2022) 12.3 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2017-2022) 12.4 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Forecast by Application (2017-2022) 13 Research Findings and Conclusion (Page -136)

List of Tables and Figures

Table Research Programs/Design for This Report Figure Bottom-up and Top-down Approaches for This Report Figure Data Triangulation Table Key Data Information from Secondary Sources Table Key Data Information from Primary Sources Figure Product Picture of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate (%) Comparison by Types (Product Category) (2016-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) by Types (Product Category) in 2016 Figure Product Picture of Bitcoin (BTC) Table Major Manufacturers of Bitcoin (BTC) Figure Product Picture of Ether (ETH) Table Major Manufacturers of Ether (ETH) Figure Product Picture of Litecoin (LTC) Table Major Manufacturers of Litecoin (LTC) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption (K Units) Comparison by Applications (2012-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Applications in 2016 Figure Transaction Examples Figure Investment Examples Figure Others Examples Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) Comparison by Regions (2012-2022) Table Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) Comparison by Regions (2012-2022) Figure United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) Status and Outlook (2012-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units) Status and Outlook (2012-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Major Players Product Capacity (K Units) 2012-2017 Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity (K Units) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity Market Share (%) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity Market Share (%) of Key Manufacturers in 2016 Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity Market Share (%) of Key Manufacturers in 2017 Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Major Players Product Output 2012-2017 Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Share by Manufacturers Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Major Players Product Revenue (Million USD) 2012-2017 Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) by Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Manufacturers Table Global Market Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Average Price (USD/Unit) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure Global Market Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Average Price (USD/Unit) of Key Manufacturers in 2016 Table Manufacturers Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Manufacturing Base Distribution and Sales Area Table Manufacturers Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Product Category Figure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Share (%) of Top 3 Manufacturers Figure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Share (%) of Top 5 Manufacturers Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity (K Units) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity Market Share by Regions (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity Market Share by Regions (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity Market Share by Regions Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) by Regions Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) by Regions (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Regions Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units) and Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption (K Units) Market by Regions (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Regions (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Regions Table United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import & Export (K Units) (2012-2017) Table EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import & Export (K Units) (2012-2017) Table China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import & Export (K Units) (2012-2017) Table Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import & Export (K Units) (2012-2017) Table South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import & Export (K Units) (2012-2017) Table Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Import & Export (K Units) (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) by Types (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Share (%) by Types (2012-2017) Figure Output Market Share (%) of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain by Types (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Output Market Share (%) of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain by Types Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) by Types (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) by Types (2012-2017) Figure Revenue Market Share (%) of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain by Types (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Revenue Market Share (%) of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain by Types Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Price (USD/Unit) by Types (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth (%) by Type (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption (K Units) by Applications (2012-2017) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Applications (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Applications (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) by Applications in 2016 Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Growth Rate by Applications (2012-2017) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Growth Rate by Applications (2012-2017) Table ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure ZEB IT Service Pvt. Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Coinsecure Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Coinsecure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Coinsecure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Coinsecure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Coinsecure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Coinbase Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Coinbase Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Coinbase Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Coinbase Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Coinbase Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Bitstamp Ltd. Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Bitstamp Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Bitstamp Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Bitstamp Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Bitstamp Ltd. Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Litecoin Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Litecoin Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Litecoin Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Litecoin Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Litecoin Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Poloniex Inc Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Poloniex Inc Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Poloniex Inc Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Poloniex Inc Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Poloniex Inc Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table BitFury Group Limited Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table BitFury Group Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure BitFury Group Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure BitFury Group Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure BitFury Group Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Unocoin Technologies Private Limited Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Unocoin Technologies Private Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Unocoin Technologies Private Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Unocoin Technologies Private Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Unocoin Technologies Private Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Ripple Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table Ripple Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure Ripple Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure Ripple Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure Ripple Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table OKEX Fintech Company Limited Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors Table OKEX Fintech Company Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Unit), Revenue (Million USD), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (%) (2012-2017) Figure OKEX Fintech Company Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Growth Rate (%) (2012-2017) Figure OKEX Fintech Company Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Figure OKEX Fintech Company Limited Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) (2012-2017) Table Output Base and Market Concentration Rate of Raw Material Figure Price Trend of Key Raw Materials Table Key Suppliers of Raw Materials Figure Manufacturing Cost Structure (Percentage) of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Figure Manufacturing Process Analysis of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Figure Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Industrial Chain Analysis Table Raw Materials Sources of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Major Manufacturers in 2016 Table Major Buyers of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Table Distributors/Traders List Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Capacity, Output (K Units) and Growth Rate (%) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (%) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Price and Trend Forecast (2017-2022) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) Forecast by Regions (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) Forecast by Regions (2017-2022) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption (K Units) Forecast by Regions (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption Market Share (%) Forecast by Regions (2017-2022) Figure United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Figure United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Table United States Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export and Import (K Units) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Figure EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Table EU Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export and Import (K Units) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Figure China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Table China Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export and Import (K Units) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Figure Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Table Japan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export and Import (K Units) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Figure South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Table South Korea Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export and Import (K Units) Forecast (2017-2022) Figure Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Figure Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate Forecast (2017-2022) Table Taiwan Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output, Consumption, Export and Import (K Units) Forecast (2017-2022) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output (K Units) Forecast by Type (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Output Market Share (%) Forecast by Type (2017-2022) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue (Million USD) Forecast by Type (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Revenue Market Share (%) Forecast by Type (2017-2022) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Price (USD/Unit) Forecast by Type (2017-2022) Table Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption (K Units) Forecast by Application (2017-2022) Figure Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Consumption (K Units) Forecast by Application (2017-2022)

Read this article:
Global Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Market Research ...

Read More..
Posted in Cryptocurrency | Leave a Comment

Cryptocurrency Boom Predicted By Bitcoin Market Data CEO Confirmed, Trend ‘Set To Continue’ – Forbes

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Forbes
Cryptocurrency Boom Predicted By Bitcoin Market Data CEO Confirmed, Trend 'Set To Continue'
Forbes
Where's the cryptocurrency market heading? Well, a prediction made in January over a boom in market capitalization of cryptocurrencies - and particularly in the altcoin market - by the founder of a crypto-market intelligence start-up that raised over ...

Here is the original post:
Cryptocurrency Boom Predicted By Bitcoin Market Data CEO Confirmed, Trend 'Set To Continue' - Forbes

Read More..
Posted in Cryptocurrency | Leave a Comment

Creditbit Price Soars; More to Come with Cryptocurrency Hype – newsBTC

April 14, 2017 | Author: admin

Creditbit price soared against the US Dollar and Bitcoin to register nasty gains, and it looks like more gains are possible considering the recent moves.

Creditbit price soared against the US Dollar and Bitcoin to register nasty gains, and it looks like more gains are possible considering the recent moves.

Creditbit, which is a relatively new cryptocurrency is on the move recently. Its price registered nasty gains during the past few days, and it looks unstoppable at the moment. It is developed on an independent Bitcoin-like Blockchain on December 2015. They also recently launched a new Creditbit Info APP. According to details on the website, the app helps in providing basic information about Creditbit coin. With the app, one can follow its price in the real-time action.

The app also helps users and traders to find markets to buy Credibit coin. The price of the coin marched higher recently against the US Dollar and Bitcoin. First, the CRBIT/USD pair gained heavy bids from the $1.70 low, and started moving higher. There was a strong upside move, as the price moved past the $3 and $5 resistance levels to trade as high as $7.25.

Similarly, the CRBIT/BTC pair moved higher from the 0.0015BTC to trade above the 0.0050BTC resistance. The current price action looks god and with Cryptocurrency Hype, there are chances of more gains in the near term. The price is currently correcting sharply towards 0.003BTC, but it remains supported on the downside for yet another upside move.

Hourly MACD The MACD for the CRBIT/BTC pair is stabilizing in the bullish zone.

Hourly RSI The RSI for the CRBIT/BTC pair is correcting lower from the extreme overbought levels.

Intraday Support Level 0.0030BTC

Intraday Resistance Level 0.0050BTC

Charts from Worldcoinindex

Read more:
Creditbit Price Soars; More to Come with Cryptocurrency Hype - newsBTC

Read More..
Posted in Cryptocurrency | Leave a Comment