Page 4,316«..1020..4,3154,3164,3174,318..4,3304,340..»

EU GDPR compliance puts focus on data tracking, encryption – TechTarget

The EU's General Data Protection Regulation officially goes into effect in less than a year, but enterprises will need to know more than the impending deadline and potential monetary penalties to navigate the complexities of GDPR compliance.

The EU GDPR will be enforced starting on May 25, 2018, and noncompliance for protecting personal information of EU residents could result in financial penalties as high as 4% of a company's annual revenue or 20 million euros -- whichever is greater. According to some experts, the most important thing to remember about becoming EU GDPR-compliant is the data being protected under the new regulation represents personal information about actual human beings.

"All too often, people view personal data as just another piece of information that they are working with -- a commodity," said Elizabeth Maxwell, mainframe technical director at Compuware Corp., a mainframe software company headquartered in Detroit. "However, this data represents a real person and should therefore be respected. They need to look at data and develop some empathy for the person to whom it belongs. How would they feel if their data was misused, leading to distress, fraud or reputational damage?"

Patrick McGrath, director of solutions marketing at Commvault, a data protection company headquartered in Tinton Falls, N.J., agreed, saying companies need to protect personal data regardless of whether it's in their data center or a third-party cloud service.

"Even if breached data was not stored on premises under your direct control, it is still your responsibility to determine whether or not personal information could have been compromised, and if so, to enact notification procedures," McGrath said. "They are your customers, prospects, donors and employees."

Jason Rose, senior vice president of marketing at Gigya Inc., a customer identity and access management company headquartered in Mountain View, Calif., suggested EU GDPR may foster relationships both inside and outside the organization.

"GDPR compliance isn't possible when teams are working in silos. Security professionals need to link arms with marketing, IT and legal because GDPR's requirement for 'privacy by design' demands new approaches to customer relationships," Rose said. "This includes giving customers complete control over their data, along with clear and concise terms of service that explain how customer data will be used."

Complying with a new set of data privacy regulations -- especially when a company already faces existing privacy regulations, such as HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley or the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard -- may seem like a huge burden, but Lacy Gruen, director at RES Software, a digital workspace company headquartered in Radnor, Pa., said it should be considered an opportunity.

"Complying with the regulation is in fact a high-ROI opportunity," Gruen said. "Once businesses get their data protection strategy in order, they'll see that GDPR compliance is a piece of investment that can change the way their organization stores and handles user data for the better. When an organization knows precisely where their data is located, why it's there and who has access to it, that will not only improve analytics-driven decision-making, but will also strengthen defense against data breaches and other cyber-risks."

Noting that companies facing GDPR compliance are allocating big budgets for security, Gruen said it's "a great time to streamline processes and policies for improved efficiency, so IT resources can be redirected to more strategic functions and projects. Regulations change and new legislation continues to pop up, but if an organization takes the right data protection measures now and gets the right tools in place, the benefits will extend well beyond just compliance with GDPR."

Not all experts were as optimistic about the effects of the EU GDPR, though.

Richard Stiennon, chief strategy officer at Blancco Technology Group, a data security company headquartered in Alpharetta, Ga., worried about the possibility that GDPR compliance could prove to be an obstacle for entering or remaining in European markets for some companies.

"Will the compliance requirements be so onerous that companies, especially technology vendors, ban EU data subjects from their services?" Stiennon said. "Imagine the latest and greatest new thing, like a Skype or Angry Birds app, being developed by a couple of engineers in their garage. They may grow to millions of users in a short time frame while not being in a position to employ a data protection officer, let alone fulfill all the other requirements. So, they may block downloads or activations in the EU, thus restricting access to the latest and greatest thing. Even well-established tech companies could decide that doing business in the EU is not worth the hassle and expense."

According to several experts, encryption will be an overlooked but key part of preparing for and complying with GDPR.

"Encryption can be your 'get out of jail free' card," said Nigel Hawthorn, EMEA marketing director at Skyhigh Networks, a cloud security company headquartered in Campbell, Calif., both because "it is a clear investment in a technology to aim to reduce the data loss risk (and any fines are based on the investment in risk reduction)," but also because it eases the requirement to inform data subjects -- people -- whose data has been compromised if that data has been encrypted.

Because GDPR requires that companies incorporate data protection by design and by default, Hawthorn said "internal software engineering teams need to ensure new applications and systems are designed with data protection in mind from the outset. Even though development teams are always looking to deliver fast, data protection cannot be ignored."

Ameesh Divatia, CEO of Baffle Inc., a cloud-centric encryption company based in Santa Clara, Calif., said the first step for enterprises is to find ways to encrypt data that is "in use" at the application layer; the second step is to "minimize or eliminate access to sensitive data and encryption keys by DBAs [database administrators] and network and storage administrators by allowing all database queries to be executed on encrypted data without increased complexity or significant impacts to performance."

McGrath advised organizations to avoid exposing themselves to GDPR penalties by taking care to avoid keeping more personal data than is necessary for their business and legal needs.

"As a best practice, we encourage organizations to use archiving policies that identify instances of personal data, delete, encrypt and/or move data to more secure locations that are fully tracked," McGrath said. "While education is helpful, automation is key. With the rapid adoption of cloud and SaaS [software-as-a-service] application partners, data is becoming further distributed and it demands proper data protection coverage."

With GDPR, businesses will be focusing on securing a specific set of data -- EU personal information. While this is a great start, the danger is that they are focusing on this small set of data when they have problems across their environment. Brian Veccitechnical evangelist at Varonis

Data traceability will also be critical for EU GDPR compliance.

"Security professionals should enforce in their organization true data traceability across data workflows," said Florian Douetteau, CEO of Dataiku, a data science software company headquartered in New York. "When manipulating derived customer data, each column should contain some sensitivity tagging, and each company should evaluate the risk associated to a piece of data whether it is raw, anonymized or aggregated. In order to achieve this, each pipeline transforming the data must transfer and maintain the metadata associated to those risks."

Brian Vecci, technical evangelist at insider threat protection vendor Varonis, based in New York, suggested companies should look beyond the bare minimum requirements for protecting data under EU GDPR and consider the bigger picture.

"With GDPR, businesses will be focusing on securing a specific set of data -- EU personal information. While this is a great start, the danger is that they are focusing on this small set of data when they have problems across their environment," Vecci said. "We saw with the recent WannaCry outbreak that it's not just sensitive files that can do a large amount of damage if attacked or exposed, it's all files. GDPR legislates a lot of common sense data security, but personal data creeps into all sorts of files, and even non-GDPR forms of data need just as much protection."

Drew Nielsen, chief trust officer at cloud data protection provider Druva, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., agreed about the need to track down all the data.

"The most overlooked aspect of GDPR that no one is focusing on is to understand an organization's data attack surface," Nielsen said. "Since GDPR is all about the data, if an organization does not have a solid handle on all the places that structured and unstructured information is stored -- which includes endpoints, servers, SaaS-based cloud applications and databases -- there is almost zero chance of complying with GDPR."

Read about dealing with data under GDPR

Learn more tips for GDPR compliance

Browse the essential guide to GDPR for more about compliance

More here:
EU GDPR compliance puts focus on data tracking, encryption - TechTarget

Read More..

Green Party amends impending misconception of ending end-to-end encryption – The indy100

On the Andrew Marr show this morning, Green Party leader Caroline Lucas said she wanted to end end-to-end encryption.

This subsequently trended with lots of people on Twitter expressing their shock at the claims, not toeing the line withGreen Party policy.

The question, asked by Andrew Marr was:

You say in your manifesto, you think the internet should be 'free of state and corporate surveillance with our rights and freedoms protected.'

In these circumstances, and knowing that jihadi groups and extremist groups use encrypted messaging on the internet and also use the internet to provide their hate-filled messages.

Do you really think that's a sensible policy?

Lucas responded by saying Green Party policy is about opposing the large scale at which people are on the domestic extremist list. She acknowledged that she herself is onthis list.

He then asked:

Do you think that ending end-to-end encryption is wrong?

Lucas replied:

Do I think that ending end-to-end encryption is wrong? No.

Then Marr, somewhat confusingly asked:

So you would like to see an end to it, this end-to-end encryption, very very controversial, I'll be talking to the Home Secretary about it later on.

You would like to see that ended?

She replied that the bottom line for the Green Party is taking advice from security services about what keeps us safe.

Lucas later clarified the remarks that the Green Party do not want to see an end-to-end encryption, and that she was confused by the wording of the question.

She also asserted that she knew what it was despite a lot of speculation on Twitter.

In particular, the light has been shone on Home Secretary Amber Rudd, who critics accuse of not understanding it.

Encryption, by the way, is a service that ensure messages between two devices or users are only readable between those communicating.

Popular messaging services WhatsApp uses end-to-end encryption.

If you decrypt the service that keeps messages private, it essentially renders every message on the service readable. You can't selectively decrypt.

So when Marr asked if Lucas wanted to end end-to-end encryption, he was asking if she wanted to make it illegal to have a messaging service that's unable to be read by the government.

More: Amber Rudd talked about WhatsApp encryption and everyone is correcting her

Go here to read the rest:
Green Party amends impending misconception of ending end-to-end encryption - The indy100

Read More..

Bitcoin could hit $100000 in 10 years, says the analyst who correctly called its $2000 price – CNBC

The bitcoin industry has had its fair share of problems and reputational damage. The digital currency has often had an image of being used for illegal means such as buying drugs online. The collapse of Mt.Gox in 2014, once the world's largest bitcoin exchange, is still fresh in the minds of users. Some members of the exchange are still waiting for compensation.

More recent issues include some exchanges not allowing people to withdraw their money in fiat currency. On top of this, the view of bitcoin as a currency for criminals is still prevalent after the major WannaCry ransomware cyberattack saw hackers lock peoples' files and ask for bitcoin in exchange to unlock them.

Still, Van-Petersen says that the industry is still extremely young and big improvements will come. A few factors will boost bitcoin adoption including better wallets, easier methods to buy the digital currency, use of it for money transfers in areas like remittances, as well as citizens of countries with volatile economies and currencies buying it.

"Volumes are going up, volatility is going down. A lot of people talk about the volatility, but if you are in Zimbabwe or Venezuela, this volatility is nothing. This is the interesting thing to me. I think in the West, a lot of people view it is as speculative, but emerging markets will get it, their needs will be different," Van-Petersen added.

While Van-Petersen is offering one way to value bitcoin in the future, others say that there are other factors to take into consideration.

"It's one way of slicing the pie to try and predict future prices which always relies on a lot of assumptions," Charlie Hayter, CEO of industry website CryptoCompare, told CNBC by email.

"Equating volumes to price value is one method of attempting a valuation, but it doesn't take into account the fundamentals of the ecosystem."

The fundamentals of what bitcoin is capable of from a technical point of view and how regulation is molded around its use will determine its value too, Hayter added.

Original post:
Bitcoin could hit $100000 in 10 years, says the analyst who correctly called its $2000 price - CNBC

Read More..

7 People Set to Make a Killing from the Bitcoin Boom – Fortune

You've probably heard about bitcoin's incredible bull run and how, if you'd bought some a few years ago, you would be a lot richer. Well, it turns out some people did just that.

Those who bet big on bitcoin in recent years are now presiding over the digital equivalent of Scrooge McDuck's money bin. The currency has given up some of its crazy gains from last week, but is still sitting at around $2,300 as of Monday morningup about $1,000 from a month ago, and over 300% from a year ago.

No one knows for sure who has the most bitcoin since the digital currency is hard to trace. But here is a list of those who have a big stake in bitcoin, and are set to clean up if the boom continues.

Tim DraperPhotograph by Danny Moloshok Reuters

In 2014, billionaire Tim Draper made the sort of bold bet that is the hallmark of famous venture capitalists: he bid for and won all 30,000 bitcoinsup for grabs in an auction run by the U.S. Marshals Service.

Draper did not reveal how much he made for the bitcoins, which wereseized from the drug lord Ross Ulbricht, but the market price at the time was around $600. Today, the 30,000 bitcoins are worth around $7 million and most of thatis profit for Draper.

Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss in Austin, Texas in March 2015.Photograph by Alli HarveyGetty Images

For the longest time, it looked like theWinklevoss twinsfate in life was to be known for losing out to Mark Zuckerberg for control of Facebook. But their successful second act (aside from those weird pistachio ads ) as bitcoin entrepreneurs mean Cameron and Tyler are now most likely to remembered as cryptocurrency pioneers and very wealthy ones at that.

While they lost their initial bid to create a bitcoin ETF, the twins are likely to winover regulators in the long-run. In the meantime, their 2013 investment of $11 million worth of bitcoin (which reported amounted to 1 percent of all bitcoins in circulation) would now be worth more than 20 times that amount.

Fortune Photograph by Kevin Moloney/Fortune Brainstorm

Barry Silbert is another long-time player in the bitcoin scene, who made big bets when most people laughed that the currency was for kooks. One of his bets saw him obtain 48,000 bitcoins in a second auction held by the U.S. Marshals Service in 2014. At that time, bitcoin prices had fallen to around $350, which means Silbert's stake could now be worth around $110 million.

Silbert is currently focused on building a rival financial product to the Winklevoss ETF, and likely owns a lot more than the 48,000 bitcoins he won at auction.

Charlie ShremPhotograph by Craig RuttleAP

Shrem is a colorful figure from the wild west early days of bitcoin. Once a member of the Bitcoin Foundationagroup that was supposed to govern bitcoin but saw several of its members endup on the lam or in jailShremreceived a two-year prison sentence for charges related to money laundering.

Since late 2016, hehas been back on the cryptocurrency scene and appears as enthusiastic as ever about its prospects.Shrem hasn't saidhow many bitcoins he owns, but he is rumored to have acquired thousands of them back they cost $3 a pop and his new venture, a startup involving crypto-investments, suggests he still has a very big stake.

Faceless manMichael Murphy Getty Images

Sincehis2008 white paper, which described a new type of software tied to a digital currency, the man known as Satoshihas stood as the soul of bitcoin.

But no one can say for sure he is.

Satoshi has not spoken publicly for years, but he is believed to control large numbers of bitcoin wallets from the currency's early days. Some reports say he controls more than 5% of all bitcoin in circulation, which means his net worthcould be in the billions.

It remains to be seen if Satoshi will emerge one day and distribute that wealth (maybe by endowing a bitcoin university?) orif Satoshi and his riches will remain invisible and out of reach forever.

The early idealists of bitcoin saw it as an anarchy-currency free of the control of national governments. Alas, the U.S. government didn't get the memo. Since 2016, the Internal Revenue Service has been stepping up a campaign to identify bitcoin investors and slap them with capital gains tax.

Right now, the agency is locked in a legal fight with the popular cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, and is demanding information about millions of customer accounts. The IRS is annoyed because it says only 802 people declared bitcoin income in 2015even though the value of the currency has increased dramatically from its 2013 value of $13.

The dispute is now before the courts and, even though Republicans in Congress told the IRS to back off , the tax man usually wins in the end.

View original post here:
7 People Set to Make a Killing from the Bitcoin Boom - Fortune

Read More..

Bitcoin, Stocks and the Fear of Missing Out – Bloomberg

On the up and up.

Bitcoin has been on an unbelievable run. The cryptocurrency is up around 124 percent for 2017. And thats after it gained 125 percent in 2016. In May alone, its up more than 60 percent. Its hard to know what the long-term impact or performance will be, but one things for sure -- investors are swept up in cryptocurrency mania.

One simple theory for Bitcoins vertiginous rise in recent weeks is that its turning into something of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Momentum begets momentum and buying begets buying when gains begin to come hard and fast.

Consider that Bitcoins price is up, on average, four out of every five days in May. Its up seven out of every 10 days in 2017. When you combine these types of batting averages with large gains, its sure to grab peoples attention and attract performance chasers and speculators who want to get in on the action. Seeing gains on top of gains increases investor confidence that those gains will last indefinitely. Confidence grows with each new high.

Contrast these results with the stock market. Since 1926, if you were to take the daily performance of the S&P 500 and break things down into gains and losses, the numbers show that its basically a coin flip between up and down days, with 54 percent of all days showing positive performance and 46 percent with negative returns.

Even during the huge bull market since early 2009, the daily returns have followed a similar pattern:

The positive days slightly outweigh the negative days, but its close enough that any time stocks begin to fall investors worry that the end is near for this lengthy rally.

The reason these types of statistics matter is that human nature makes it difficult for people to process losses in the same way they deal with gains. Research from the behavioral psychologist Daniel Kahneman shows that we regret losses twice as much as gains make us feel good. This bias is called loss aversion.

So the probability of seeing gains or losses can have a huge impact on our actions as investors.

Since the daily performance in the stock market is more or less a 50-50 proposition, loss aversion means that checking the value of your investments on a daily basis will make you feel terrible every single day. All those warm feelings you get from the winning days in the markets will be completely wiped out by the double dose of pain of the down days.

The simple solution to deal with this issue for stock market investors is to avoid evaluating your portfolio on a regular basis. The more you look, the more likely it is that youll see losses since stocks dont hit new highs every single day. While stocks alternate gains and losses, on average, if you lengthen your time horizon, the probabilities for a positive return are much higher.

Using the same data for the S&P 500 going back to 1926, all one-year periods showed gains roughly three out of every four years. Extend the time horizon to 10 years, and it was close to 95 percent of all periods with gains. Less frequent portfolio evaluations make it more likely that youll see gains, and, in effect, reduce the pain experienced through loss aversion.

Everyone seems to have an opinion about how high the price of Bitcoin can go or how quickly it will fall back down to Earth. Yet its impossible to forecast the emotions of other investors, and at a certain point thats all that ends up driving these types of price moves. But my guess would be that the current Bitcoin rally will start its downfall once the daily returns are more evenly balanced out between up and down days.

Professionals offering actionable insights on markets, the economy and monetary policy.

A roundup connecting the dots in global markets.

It may be obvious to state that an increase in volatility will cause investors to bail, but its helpful to understand the reasons behind this type of price action. Once loss aversion begins to be felt again in the price of Bitcoin, that will likely spell the end of its relentless rally. Unfortunately, figuring out when this will happen is extremely difficult, as predicting a change in market direction has almost no rhyme or reason.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story: Ben Carlson at ben@ritholtzwealth.com

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Max Berley at mberley@bloomberg.net

See the original post:
Bitcoin, Stocks and the Fear of Missing Out - Bloomberg

Read More..

‘Bitcoin Oracle’ Vinny Lingham On Why Bitcoin Is Overpriced – Forbes


Forbes
'Bitcoin Oracle' Vinny Lingham On Why Bitcoin Is Overpriced
Forbes
During the episode, he describes how his experience with fraud at his former company, gift card retailer Gyft (which he eventually sold to First Data) helped him understand the advantages of bitcoin and blockchain technology. (Here's how Gyft was using ...

View post:
'Bitcoin Oracle' Vinny Lingham On Why Bitcoin Is Overpriced - Forbes

Read More..

Five Big Reasons Why People Are Still Skeptical About Bitcoin – Bloomberg

Bitcoins astronomical rally has cryptocurrency bulls feeling vindicated. Not so fast, skeptics say.

The digital currencysmore than 100 percent surge in the past two months looks eerily familiar, argue the bears, pointing to November 2013, when the price quintupled in short order to top $1,000 for the first time. By Valentines Day it was worth around half that, and spent the better part of the next two years languishing below $500.

Then it absolutely exploded -- jumping more than $1,400 in two months. At its height last week, one bitcoin could buy about two ounces of gold. Its championstouted the arrival of blockchain into the mainstream, the coins underlying technology which they say can lift the poor out of poverty and make transactions more secure, inexpensive and efficient.

But signs of a top have emerged, detractors warn. On May 25, bitcoin surged more than $300 to a record only to turn tail and close little changed. The $600 round trip was the biggest daily swing in its history. It then slumped 8 percent the next day. Bitcoin was down 1.5 percent to $2,255.50 as of 12:35 p.m. in New York. For bears, that kind of volatility shows the assets unreliability as a store of value.

Here are some other reasons why they warn caution is warranted:

This months ransomware attacks serve as a reminder that bitcoin is still beloved by hackers and criminals because of its anonymity. The cryptocurrency plunged in 2014 after Tokyo-based Mt. Gox -- then the largest bitcoin exchange -- said it had been breached and then filed for bankruptcy. Its value sank again in August 2016 after hackers stole about $69 million from Hong Kong-based Bitfinex. The exchange has since repaid its customers.

The bitcoin community has beensplit for more than a year on how to upgrade its blockchain. The time and fees necessary to verify transactions have climbed to record highs, making it more difficult for businesses to use the currency as a means of payment.While bitcoin executives have said that 2017 might be the year the cryptocurrency really starts to scale, others arent so sure.

Exclusive insights on technology around the world.

Get Fully Charged, from Bloomberg Technology.

Last week, more than 50 companies signed a pact to speed up transactions, but ideological differences have prevented similar agreements -- like the one reached last year in Hong Kong -- from actually being implemented. The much-touted SegWit upgrade was also released in October, but only a third of the community has embraced it.If the latest proposal fails to gain traction and the deadlock continues, digital currency users may dump bitcoin in favor of alt-coins that offer better blockchains.

As the surge sends the cryptocurrency world into a frenzy, it can be easy to lose sight of the bigger picture. While bitcoins value has increased more than 100 percent since the beginning of the year, its slice of the pie has shrunk as its digital cousins steal some of the spotlight. There are an estimated 700 rivals, according to Ron Quaranta, chairman of the Wall Street Blockchain Alliance.

Bitcoin dominated about half of the overall digital currency market as of Friday, down from around 85 percent in February, according to data from CoinMarketCap.com. Meanwhile, Ethereums share increased to about 20 percent. Some token fans arent sweating it though, as they say bitcoins potential demise doesnt really matter as long as another digital currency takes hold.

The general public doesnt understand bitcoin, and many regulators still dont either, which makes it tough to regulate. In 2015, New York started issuing controversial licenses to cryptocurrency companies, but only three had been issued as of mid-January, according to Coinbase, as many startups couldnt afford the costs of applying.

In January, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority asked the public for help identifying the potential risks of blockchain. Two months later,bitcoin plummeted after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rejected a proposal by the Winklevoss twins for a publicly traded fund based on the digital currency.

In a report last week about blockchain in China, analysts at Sanford C. Bernstein wrote that while the technology could benefit Chinese banks, its unlikely to start a financial revolution.

"We believe blockchain application is more likely to be evolutionary rather than revolutionary in developing countries like China," the analysts said. "Aside from the conservative regulatory attitudes toward financial innovations, the constraint of confidentiality and performance of blockchain technology would make it best positioned to be enterprise-oriented rather than consumer-end."

Whether its Hollands tulip-bulb craze in the 17th century or the Internet-stock frenzy of the late 1990s, history shows that markets self correct. Speculative markets usually run out of steam at some point. Determining the trigger is always the hard part. Given the breathtaking run in bitcoin as of late, some say its tough to believe the oft-cited mantra that this time is different.

Link:
Five Big Reasons Why People Are Still Skeptical About Bitcoin - Bloomberg

Read More..

Omise to raise $19M in first cryptocurrency sale from a major VC-backed startup – TechCrunch

The tech industry is opening its eyes to the possibilities of raising money using cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and Ethereum through initial coinofferings,and its about to see the first ICO from a major venture-backed company.

Last week, Kik, a messaging app popular with young people in North America,announced an ambitious plan to launch its own currency as a basis for a developer community. Kik has raised over $120 million from investors to date and it claims 300 million registered users,making it the most established company to throw its hat in the ICO ring thus far, but it is about to be beaten to the punch by Omise, a Thailand-based company that provides Stripe-like payment features in Japan and Southeast Asia.

Four-year-old Omise has raised $20 million from investors, including SBI, Sinar Mas and Ascend Group, but now it is turning to cryptocurrencies and the blockchain for its next move. The company is looking to raise up to $19 million through the sale of its own coin OMG, short forOmise Go which will be used to power a network that letsusers transfer money and make payments without the need for a bank account or high service fees.

The coreaim is to encourage financial inclusion in emerging markets by creatinga platform that other companies beyond Omise can use.

Bloomberg previously reportedon Omises desire to hold an ICO. Omise declined to provide a specific date for the event, but sources close to the company toldTechCrunch it is on course to hold a token sale on June 7.

Under proposed terms, 65 percent of all coins will be released during the sale. A further20 percent will be retainedby Omise for future costs and expenses with 10 percent left for the companys team. The remaining five percent is set aside for airdropping, which essentially means that small amounts will be given to people who already own Ethereums Ether coin to stoke interest and widen engagement.

The company isnt planning to make another token sale in the future, representatives told TechCrunch, in order to prevent dilution.

ICOs, or token sales, have to date proven popular with blockchain- and bitcoin-focused companies, but the appeal and possibilities are beginning to spark interestamong more mainstream businesses in the tech domain. CNBC recently reported that ICOs have raised $180 million this year, compared to $101 million in all oflast year.

Cloud services firm Storj is generally agreed to be one of the more successful initial coin offerings to date having raised $30 million from its Storjcoin thus far. Digital identity platformCivic is planning an offering that could top that, according to CNBC, but neither has raised anything like the capital from traditional VCs as Kik or Omise.

Kiks plan for its coin which will be called Kin is focused around enabling a developer ecosystem that isnt reliant on advertising. Its a major play against existing systems like Facebook, and therefore bold and risky. Omise, meanwhile, is taking a more conventional path with its plan to develop a wholly decentralized payment platform Omise Go.

The company, which serves business customers in Japan, Thailand and Indonesia, currently operates as a payment enabler that lets companies take money from customers online. That predominantly focuses on credit cards but, unlike larger global players such as Stripe, Omise offers support for alternative options such as paying over the counter at convenience stores. Thats because credit card and bank account penetration is substantially lower in emerging markets like Southeast Asia so alternatives are needed in order to cater to mass market consumers.

With Omise Go and the OMG coin Omise wants to remove even more of the boundaries by removing even the need to own a bank account. Omise plans to open-source its mobile wallet technology, and develop a decentralized payment system using the blockchain and OMG, whichEthereums ERC20 token standard. By decentralizing its network, Omise hopes to offer a more level playing field for fintech startups providing services that exceed traditional credit card networks and ultimately increasefinancial inclusion.

The reason we chose blockchain technology is that we want to build a network that people can actually trust, Omise co-founder Donnie Harinsut said in a video explaining the motivation behindthe token offering.

We want everyone to have access to financial services no matter who you are in society. Its a fundamental right, not a privilege, he added.

Beyond a fundraising event for the company, the ICO offers an opportunity for would-be investors to buy into the Omise Go network. OMG coin owners will be able to make money like a dividend byearning fees from validating transactions that occur on the Omise Go network. Theres also the potential to sell their coin should the value of it increase thats dependent on the network and success of the product.

This isnt an overnight decisionfor Omise. The startup has invested in cryptocurrencies and the blockchain since 2015, that included providinga $100,000 grantfor the Ethereum Foundations Devgrants program. It lists Ethereum creatorVitalik Buterin andJoseph Poon, the architect of bitcoins Lightning Network, among its advisors, and there are other ties, too.Wendell Davis, who was part of the original Ethereum founding team, is Omises product development lead while special advisor Thomas Greco has also served as an advisor to the Foundation.

Prior to its June ICO, Omise has published a technical whitepaperand a crowdsale document think a pre-IPO prospectus, but for ICOs to provide further color on its plans. Theres even a dedicated Slack channel where interested investors can ask questions and gather further information.

Read the rest here:
Omise to raise $19M in first cryptocurrency sale from a major VC-backed startup - TechCrunch

Read More..

Bolivian Authorities Arrest 60 ‘Cryptocurrency Promoters’ Bitcoin … – Bitcoin Magazine

Update, May 30th: While the use and circulation of virtual currencies is banned in Bolivia, it is now unclear whether that's what the suspects are really charged with. Reports as well as local sources suggest that they may instead be charged with running pyramid schemes that use bitcoin. Alternatively, the suspects may be charged with both running pyramid schemes as well as using bitcoin.

The Bolivian Financial System Supervision Authority (ASFI) arrested 60 cryptocurrency promoters last week. According to a statement published by the ASFI, in which it refers to bitcoin and several altcoins, the arrestees were carrying out training activities relating to investments that have characteristics of multilevel schemes. The agency also indicated it will track down Bolivians promoting Bitcoin online.

Since 2014, the Latin American country and its central bank consider bitcoin as well as all altcoins to be pyramid schemes. As such, it was the first country in the world that completely prohibited use of any kind of currency that is not issued and controlled by a government or an authorized entity.

This ban forms the basis for this weeks arrests. While there are currently few specifics available, news reports suggest the Bolivians were distributing brochures promoting bitcoin, and possibly selling bitcoin online.

"We have confiscated brochures relating to business schemes that go around giving trainings and making business plans in relation to virtual currencies that are operating abroad, Valdivia Bautista stated. The Bolivian population should not participate in closed [cryptocurrency] groups through WhatsApp. The only thing they are doing is taking advantage of the population, deceiving the people to appropriate their money.

Speaking to CoinTelegraph half a year ago, the creator of the Bolivian Bitcoin Facebook group explained that Bolivian Bitcoin users maintain connections through social media. Because cryptocurrencies are banned in the Latin American country, trades are organised through small-scale discussion groups, and the exchange of bitcoins often happens in person.

Apparently, the Bolivian authorities have taken note. According to hoybolivia.com, the ASFI said that it will continue to track down and arrest anyone that promotes or sells cryptocurrency on social media or other websites. Bolivians are also asked to take care of their savings by reporting [cryptocurrency related] activities by calling a special hotline or contacting the countrys Special Forces Against Felony.

"It is important to urge the population to report these cases in which people aim to take advantage of people and their families' savings," said Valdivia Bautista.

Bolivia is not the first Latin American country that is cracking down on Bitcoin users. In February of this year, Venezuelan authorities arrested eight Bitcoin miners. In addition to that, Venezuelas main exchange Surbitcoin had to halt operations as the companys bank closed their account.

Bitcoin Magazine reached out to local authorities but received no response at time of publication.

Link:
Bolivian Authorities Arrest 60 'Cryptocurrency Promoters' Bitcoin ... - Bitcoin Magazine

Read More..

Top 5 Cryptocurrency Exchanges hit by DDoS Attacks – The Merkle

Bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchanges often suffer from an increased amount of internet traffic. In most cases, this indicates a spectacular growth among users looking to buy and sell cryptocurrencies across the platform. However, a lot of companies also suffer from DDoS attacks, or that is what they claim, at least. Below are some exchanges who suffered from recent DDoS attacks.

The past year and a half have been filled with quite a few roadblocks for the Bitfinex exchange. The company was hacked and saw over the US$70m worth of Bitcoin getting stolen. Moreover, Bitfinex sometimes faces a DDoS attack which slows down services or makes the platform completely inaccessible. One of those attacks took place in February of 2017, and it caused issues for users for quite some time. Both the front-end and API access were all impacted by this severe attack.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have seen incredible growth in popularity over the years. This is especially true in India, where demand for Bitcoin continues to grow. In December of 2016, the Indian exchange platform was hit by a major DDoS attack, shutting down the website, mobile app, and API altogether. It took a few hours of work to get everything in order again, but services were resumed pretty quickly, all things considered.

One of the oldest Bitcoin exchanges is known as BTC-E. The popularity of this platform is not on par with most other trading platforms, but it is still often used by cryptocurrency enthusiasts. One week prior to the Coinsecure DDoS attack, BTC-E suffered from a similar fate. The website was inaccessible for quite some time, although the company successfully increased its DDoS mitigation countermeasures. Ever since that time, the platform has not been targeted again by the look of things.

Larger exchanges are more prone to attracting the wrong kind of people. Kraken, one of the worlds biggest exchanges, has seen its fair share of DDoS attacks over the years. One such attack took place about three weeks ago, forcing the site and API offline. Unfortunately, a lot of traders were affected by this outage, as margin orders were closed without users being able to make changes. Margin trading across centralized platforms is always a risk, though.

The service provided by Poloniex has degraded quite a bit these past few months. For some unknown reason, the platform is incapable of dealing with their alleged user growth. As a result, the available infrastructure gets flooded during times of heavy trading, and the company often blames this on DDoS attacks. Increased user growth and DDoS attacks are not the same thing, yet it is evident Poloniex simply cant keep up with traders.

This string of DDoS attacks has caused quite a few issues for people who use the platform. Margin traders have lost a fair chunk of money these past few weeks. Moreover, it seems the company is struggling with deposit and withdrawal delays since a few weeks as well. It is unclear if this situation can improve, but for the companys sake, we can only hope they pick up the pace a bit.

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.

View post:
Top 5 Cryptocurrency Exchanges hit by DDoS Attacks - The Merkle

Read More..