Page 4,246«..1020..4,2454,2464,2474,248..4,2604,270..»

Quantum satellites demonstrate teleportation and encryption – physicsworld.com

Physicists in China have achieved the first quantum teleportation from Earth to a satellite, while their counterparts in Japan are the first to use a microsatellite for quantum communications. Both achievements suggest that practical satellite-based quantum communications could soon be a reality.

Jian-Wei Pan of the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei and colleagues used China's $100m Quantum Experiments at Space Scale (QUESS) satellite to receive a quantum-teleported state. This was done over a distance of 1400km from a high-altitude (5100m) ground station in Tibet to QUESS. This is more than 10 times further than the 100km or so possible by sending photons through optical fibres or through free space between ground-based stations.

Described in a preprint on arXiv, the process involves creating photons that are quantum-mechanically entangled and then transmitting them to QUESS. Last month, Pan and colleagues reported the distribution of quantum entanglement over 1200km using QUESS.

Meanwhile, Masahide Sasaki and colleagues at the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology in Japan have shown that quantum information can be transmitted to Earth from a 5.9kg photon source called SOTA which is on board a 48kg Japanese microsatellite called SOCRATES.

Writing in Nature Photonics, Sasaki's team reports that they were able to receive and process the information at a ground station in Japan using a quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol. QKD is uses principles of quantum mechanics to ensure that two parties can share an encryption key secure in the knowledge that it has not been intercepted by a third party.

Read more from the original source:
Quantum satellites demonstrate teleportation and encryption - physicsworld.com

Read More..

Cryptocurrencies need regulation, says CEO of Chinese bitcoin exchange BTCC – CNBC

Regulators are exploring ways to regulate these digital currencies, and some have flexed their muscles in recent months. Earlier this year, the People's Bank of China stepped up its efforts to regulate the market, including setting up a task force to carry out inspections and ensure bitcoin exchanges had implemented anti-money laundering systems, and warned several exchanges against violating rules.

Some saw the moves from the PBOC as an attempt to crackdown on bitcoin and part of Beijing's broader attempts to stem capital outflows. But Lee disagreed.

"It's not really a crackdown," he said. "The central bank previously was not very aware of the details of how bitcoin is utilized, how bitcoin is traded."

He explained that the surge in bitcoin prices coincided with the massive capital outflows from China and the exchange rate changes of the renminbi against the dollar.

"There was a causation and correlation issue. People thought bitcoin was causing it but after studying it more, I think the central bank has realized that bitcoin is not the cause of the change in exchange rate, nor is it the cause of the capital outflows."

Even then, some key voices in China are skeptical about the future of cryptocurrencies in the mainland. Earlier this month, reports said an adviser to the PBOC said virtual currencies like bitcoin are assets, but they do not have the attributes needed to be a currency that can meet modern economic development needs.

Lee said central banks need to embrace the fact that bitcoin is a new digital currency that's being traded actively in China and around the world.

"It's a new thing the central banks should pay attention to and figure out what the rules and regulations should be."

Excerpt from:
Cryptocurrencies need regulation, says CEO of Chinese bitcoin exchange BTCC - CNBC

Read More..

Former MtGox Bitcoin exchange boss pleads not guilty – BBC News


BBC News
Former MtGox Bitcoin exchange boss pleads not guilty
BBC News
The former head of MtGox, once the world's biggest Bitcoin exchange, has pleaded not guilty in a Tokyo court to charges of embezzlement and data manipulation. Mark Karpeles was chief executive of MtGox when it collapsed in 2014, following the loss of ...
Chief of bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox denies embezzlement as trial opensCNBC
Mt Gox CEO denies embezzling millions of dollars of bitcoinsABC News
Head of Mt Gox bitcoin exchange on trial for embezzlement and loss of millionsThe Guardian
TheStreet.com -TNW
all 82 news articles »

The rest is here:
Former MtGox Bitcoin exchange boss pleads not guilty - BBC News

Read More..

Bitcoin rival, ethereum, has lost $17.5 billion in market value in 4 weeks – MarketWatch

Ether, the worlds second-most valuable cryptocurrency, has been tanking since hitting a peak in mid June, highlighting an extended selloff in buzzy, digital currencies that had been on a tear only a few short weeks ago.

Check out: How cryptocurrency ethereum looks set to overtake bitcoinin one chart

A single ether token on Tuesday briefly slipped to a six-week low, dropping under $200 and marking a 48% decline, giving up about $17.5 billion since reaching its best-ever market capitalization of $36.7 billion on June 14, according to data from Coinmarketcap.com. Most recently, one ether was trading at 202.37, down 4.3% on Tuesday, according to data from popular digital-currency data-provider Coindesk.

The downdraft for ether, which powers the ethereum blockchain and is the main rival to more prominent bitcoin, is occurring amid a broad slump in the cryptocurrency universe, which had racked up dazzling, quadruple-digit gains within a short period. Ethereums ether, for example, had surged by more than 4,000% -- from $8 in January to its June peak of around $400 -- before mounting its recent pullback.

Read: Wall Street laughed at a call for bitcoin at $25,000but after a 400% surge, the laughter is fading

Attention from large corporations, including Fidelity Investments, and flirtations with the possible inclusion in popular trading products, like exchange-traded funds, also have helped to stimulate interest in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

However, worries about the speed of the advance for digital currencies, light regulation and a lack of broad usage has given many skeptics reason to call for caution in investing in bitcoin and ether, which some analysts say displays similar attributes to gold GCQ7, +0.21% viewed as a haven asset.

More broadly, the combined market value of an array of digital currencies, including ether, bitcoin, and others like ripple and litecoin, are down by about 28% to $82 billion currently from $114 billion last month. Bitcoin BTCUSD, -1.08% maintains a dominant position among so-called digital currencies, but has led the way lower, off 20% since surpassing $3,000 a coin mid-June.

By comparison, the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.00% has tacked on 0.7%, the S&P 500 index SPX, -0.08% has slipped 0.2%, while the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, +0.27% has advanced 0.3% over the past month, despite a choppy trading environment marked by concerns about earnings growth and President Donald Trumps Wall Street-friendly agenda.

All that said, cryptocurrencies are still holding on to sizable returns, even factoring in the recent downdraft. The question is: are they facing a brief pause in their rise, or suffering through what will become an extended period of pain?

Wall Street analysts are split on the future for cryptocurrencies. Morgan Stanley analysts predict that they wont rally further unless they get governmental acceptance, including more regulation.

Meanwhile, Fundstrats Tom Lee, a Wall Street equity strategist, says bitcoin may trade at $55,000 a coin by 2022.

Continued here:
Bitcoin rival, ethereum, has lost $17.5 billion in market value in 4 weeks - MarketWatch

Read More..

Bitcoin and three other investments that look like classic bubbles but actually aren’t – MarketWatch

Bubbles? Those arent bubbles.

Charles Schwab SCHW, -1.21% global strategist Jeff Kleintop says there are plenty of red-hot investments out there that might look like bubbles, but, in reality, they just dont fit the classic profile.

Bubbles typically bring risks for all investors, even those that dont own the inflating asset, he explained, because they represent a broader market and economy that has become out of balance and dependent upon a flawed outlook.

Previously, these bubbles of the past have inflated 1,000% over 10 years before bursting, cutting prices by more than half in the following two years, Kleintop explained. By the time they eventually popped, these investments had become fixtures across investors portfolio. Hence, the sweeping impact of their implosion.

As you can see from this chart, he pointed to the Nasdaq COMP, +0.27% crude oil CLQ7, +2.70% precious metals and home-builder stocks as obvious examples:

But what about those deemed bubbly in todays climate? Kleintop says the four most popular candidates are cryptocurrencies, low volatility, internet retailers and central bank assets. He applied his 1,000%/10-year filter to these investments

Remarkably, none of these seem to fit the classic profile of a potentially damaging bubble, he said. But that doesnt mean they dont carry risks for investors.

First, while bitcoin BTCUSD, -1.05% for example, has topped the 1,000%-return mark, it accomplished that feat much faster than the 10-year period.

Also read: Bitcoin rival, ethereum, has lost $17.5 billion in market value in 4 weeks

See also: Stay away from bitcoin and ethereum they are complete garbage

The shorter amount of time that it took may mean that if bitcoin is a bubble and were to burst it probably wont have as broad of a ripple effect on the economy as the technology or housing bubbles did, Kleintop said, pointing to this chart

Next, low volatility, specifically the VIX VIX, -1.98% is another area of concern. From one perspective, its 800% surge over the past 10 years pretty much matches the classic profile, but Kleintop says thats misleading.

While the pattern seems to line up fairly well with prior bubbles, he said, it would look different with a much larger rise and have more time to go until it reaches the 10 year time frame if I shifted the start date to the end of the bear market in March 2009, when volatility last peaked.

Then there are the internet retailers, like Amazon AMZN, -0.23% Clearly, these stocks have been on fire, but Kleintop says the relatively small size of the group keeps it from being a typical bubble and may limit the amount of damage a bubble pop would have on the broader market.

Unlike typical bubbles which tend to foster a purely optimistic outlook, these companies have already had a negative impact on the stocks of their traditional retail peers, leaving the overall retailing industry (composed of 10 sub-industries including internet retailers) up a smaller 500% over the same period, he wrote.

Finally, central bank assets, while clearly bloated by years of quantitative easing, dont exactly fit the mold, either. The balance sheets of the worlds central banks have grown about 300% over the past decade, coming up well shy of the 1000% level of the typical bubble.

The global buildup of debt most likely represents a long-term liability that threatens to exacerbate downturns, rather than a bubble about to burst, he noted.

Bottom line, Kleintop says that there doesnt seem to be any classic bubbles forming among the ones most commonly referred to as potential candidates. But remember that bubbles are sometimes only seen in hindsight, he said, which is why we always counsel diversification.

See the article here:
Bitcoin and three other investments that look like classic bubbles but actually aren't - MarketWatch

Read More..

Cryptocurrencies Are Getting Crushed – Bloomberg

The cryptocurrency Cassandras are starting to look right.

The sector has lost about a third of its market value since peaking in early June, pushing it into what traditional equity market analysts label as a bear market. Bitcoin, the largest of the digital currencies, is down about 20 percent from its peak of $3,000, reached June 12. Smaller rivals such as ethereum and ripple are getting hit even harder.

When when we look for signs of excess in the market, I look at bitcoin and to me that looks pretty scary, Richard Turnill, global chief investment strategist at BlackRock Inc., said during a midyear outlook presentation in New York on Tuesday.

Whether the virtual currencies were caught up in an asset-price bubble was debated as the market capitalization of the sector soared this year, raising skepticism from pundits including tech billionaire Mark Cuban. Backers such as Ripple Chief Executive Officer Brad Garlinghouse, whose money-transfer company is tied to the third-largest cryptocurrency by market value, said he isnt convinced.

"I would be surprised if there was a major crash," Garlinghouse said in an interview at Bloombergs New York headquarters Monday. "Could we see digital assets continue to double or triple or quadruple from where we are today? That wouldnt surprise me at all."

Digital coins are currently worth around $80 billion, down from a market capitalization of $100 billion on Friday and $115 billion on June 14, according to data from Coinmarketcap.com.

This weeks slump coincides withinitial hearings in the trial of the former head of Mt. Gox, the bankrupt Japan-based bitcoin exchange that imploded in 2014 after losing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of bitcoin. Chief Executive OfficerMark Karpeles pleaded not guilty in Tokyo on Tuesday to charges of embezzlement and inflating corporate financial accounts.

The turbulence may be far from over, too, as rival bitcoin enthusiasts are set to adopt two competing software updates at the end of July. This has raised the possibility that bitcoin will split in two, an unprecedented event that would send shockwaves through the market.

Read more on the dispute between bitcoin developers

Volatility is nothing new for cryptocurrency buyers, who have faced losses in recent months as exchanges grapple with outages and poor performance, struggling to keep up with the volume surge that has swept the market amid speculation about the potential for widespread adoption of virtual assets and blockchain technology.

"It is easy to look at the appreciation that we have seen this year and conclude that we are witnessing a bubble, said Martin Garcia, vice president of sales and trading at Genesis Global Trading. While I understand that the prices we are seeing now a more than a little frothy, I think that we are in the very early stages of the development of an entirely new asset class."

Read more from our TOPLive Q&A with Martin Garcia

The rest is here:
Cryptocurrencies Are Getting Crushed - Bloomberg

Read More..

Why a messaging start-up is making its own digital currency instead of going public – CNBC

Unless you've been under a rock, you've likely read a lot about ICOs (initial coin offerings) in the last few weeks. These are offerings by companies starting their own variant of blockchain-based digital currencies.

This year has not only seen the explosion in the price of bitcoin itself but also the second and third most popular cryptocurrencies Ethereum and Ripple.

More interesting, there's been a rise of many additional cryptocurrencies such as Steem, Dash, AntShares and Dogecoin. In fact, if you measure bitcoin's market capitalization as a percentage of the market capitalization for all cryptocurrencies, it's currently at 45.5 percent, down from 94 percent a year ago.

The value of all cryptocurrencies now is $88 billion, which is actually down from $114 billion a few days ago.

New ICOs have raised $500 million so far this year. One community that is showing great interest in becoming part of the trend of launching a new cryptocurrency is start-ups.

Last week, Thai fintech start-up Omise raised $25 million in an ICO to develop a decentralized payment platform. The company had already raised $20 million in traditional VC funding.

Rahul Sood's esports betting company Unikrn is launching its own cryptocurrency called UnikoinGold as the way to place esports bets on its platform. Unikrn has raised $10 million from Mark Cuban, Shari Redstone's Advancit Capital, Elisabeth Murdoch's Freelands Ventures and others.

However, social messaging company Kik has bigger plans for its upcoming ICO. In a recent talk given by Kik founder and CEO Ted Livingston, he explained that Kik saw its ICO of a currency called Kin as a potential alternative exit for them.

Like the Omise and Unikrn examples, Kik has also raised traditional venture capital money more than $120 million, including $50 million from Tencent most recently valuing the company at $1 billion. Kik's ICO will help bring it more money. Kik will sell 10 percent of its Kin currency (half to institutional investors and half to retail investors). Kik will keep 30 percent of Kin and 60 percent of Kin will be overseen by a nonprofit Kin Foundation aimed at making Kin a popular cryptocurrency. That foundation will give away 20 percent of its stock of Kin every year to developers and others who help build out the economy for Kin.

Kin will be used as the currency on the Kik social network for things like emojis, stickers, hosting and participating in group chats, building apps like bots, etc. However, the stated goal is for Kin to also be used as currency outside of the Kik app.

Even if stays confined within the Kik community, Kik has 15 million monthly active users. It's currently ranked in the 60s in terms of popularity on the App Store. That community alone will make the currency among the more popular cryptocurrencies.

But here is what's interesting, Livingston said that, if all goes well, this ICO could be Kik's liquidity event. Up until now, Kik has been thinking it had to translate its popular youthful community chat service into ad dollars in order to make a successful business similar to what Facebook has done. The problem is that Facebook and Google continue to suck up more and more of the ad dollars that are getting spent in the space.

Livingston said in the talk that the penny dropped for him when he saw Snap's S-1 IPO filing in February. Here was a young Facebook competitor seemingly doing everything right and yet still failing in its growth of its ad-based revenue. If Snap was failing, Livingston thought, what hope did Kik have of building a better ad mouse trap?

Yet, he thought, if Kik could develop a cryptocurrency that became a self-sustaining economy and Kik owned a big chunk of that supply limited currency the value of that stake in Kin could end up being more valuable than the potential exit valuation for Kik as an ad-based business in an IPO or through an acquisition. Luckily, one of Kik's earliest investors was Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures, also a big investor in the cryptocurrency space. He agreed with Ted.

Can you name the fourth most popular cryptocurrency? It's Litecoin and has a market cap of $2.5 billion. If Kin got that kind of valuation and with an established community of 15 million monthly active users, it could be a currency worth more Kik's 30 percent stake in Kin would be worth $750 million, almost equal to the valuation of Kik's last round. If Kin became as valuable as Ripple the third most popular cryptocurrency today Kik's stake would be worth $2.5 billion.

Livingston pointed out that, in this kind of scenario, an exit via M&A or an IPO would be unnecessary for Kik. Its existing backers could simply convert their shares into Kin and liquidate them. Kik could stop trying to win advertiser dollars, if it wanted. It could simply focus on developing the community's use of Kin and helping Kin proliferate outside of the Kik ecosystem.

In this scenario, according to Livingston, "we just step back and watch it continue."

Will it work out this way? Possibly for some lucky start-ups but certainly not for all. The world likely doesn't need 1,000 different cryptocurrencies. The current gold rush mentality with ICOs will probably only get bigger in the months and years to come but will probably also meet the inevitable bust of the dot-com era.

But some cryptocurrencies will endure especially ones with strong use cases and/or communities supporting them. It's intriguing to imagine if some ad-dependent companies like Kik will opt to stop competing with Facebook and Google on a battlefield they can never succeed at and go for an alternative cryptocurrency path to value creation.

Kik is truly breaking new ground with its ICO. It will be intriguing to see if it causes other unicorns to follow its lead.

Commentary by Eric Jackson, sign up for Eric's monthly Tech & Media Email. You can follow Eric on Twitter @ericjackson .

For more insight from CNBC contributors, follow @CNBCopinion on Twitter.

Disclosure: CNBC parent NBCUniversal is an investor in Snap

Read more:
Why a messaging start-up is making its own digital currency instead of going public - CNBC

Read More..

The Rise and Potential Fall of Cryptocurrency ICOs – The Merkle

With so many cryptocurrency ICOs taking place right now, something will need to change. It appears the entire cryptocurrency ICO scene is turning into a bit of a joke. Useless tokens are created which offer no real value to users, yet people are still throwing money at them. It is very unsettling.

There arepositive and negative sides to the entire cryptocurrency ICO sector. The positive element comes in the form of giving people a way to raise enough funds to create new products and services. Although not all of these concepts will succeed, using an ICO is the quickest and less cumbersome way of raising the necessary money right now. It creates a slew of new opportunities, which may also be its downfall.

To put this latter part into perspective, one could make the argument a lot of dumb money is poured into cryptocurrency ICOs. Most of these investors do not even take the time to read a projects website or white paper. All they want is instant gratification and see the value of their tokens go up by 1,000% in a week or less. Sustaining such a bubble will not be possible for much longer.

As a result, we now see a lot of prominent ICO tokens decline in value as soon as they hit an exchange. Not because people are selling at a profit, but mainly because these investorshave no patience. In fact, it has become almost cheaper to buy ICO tokens after a Bittrex listing compared to partaking in the ICO itself. Even with lucrative bonuses for early investors, there is no real reason to buy into ICOs right away. Once again, another sign of the cryptocurrency ICO bubble about to pop.

To make matters even worse, we now see people spending money on joke ICOs which offer no inherent value. Some people still believe even vaporware can be turned into something valuable, though this is rarely the case. In fact, anyone can create their own ERC20 tokens in an hour or less and post the smart contract address to the whole world. Regardless of what the tokens may be used for, there will always be people actively investing in these ICOs.

Not too long ago, we touched upon the concept of the Useless Ethereum Token. It was believed this joke ICO would not receive any money whatsoever. Things have turned out quite differently. The projects smart contract address has seen nearly 20,000 transactions since it was revealed to the public. People are actively sending money to it, although no one knows why exactly. Most of these transactions are for 0.01 ETH. However, thousands of those small transactions still add up over time.

The cryptocurrency ICO ecosystem is showing a lot of signs of becoming a bubble. Billions of dollars have been invested in projects with no actual demo or prototype. The code for these projects has never been vetted by third parties in manycases. Lots of people will lose money due to investing in ICOs. Doing your own research when it comes to cryptocurrency ICOs has never been more important than it is today.

Originally posted here:
The Rise and Potential Fall of Cryptocurrency ICOs - The Merkle

Read More..

When Clouds Break: the Hidden Dangers of Cloud Computing – Data Center Knowledge

Alex Lesser is Executive Vice President of PSSC Labs.

Todays companies are often faced with the complex decision of whether to use public cloud resources or build and deploy their own IT infrastructures. This decision is especially difficult in an age of mounting data requirements when so many people expect limitless access and ultra-flexibility. For these reasons, cloud computing has become an increasingly popular choice for many organizations though not always the right choice.

According to Right Scales 2017 State of the Cloud Survey, 85 percent of enterprises have a multi-cloud strategy.

Common reasons for using public cloud resources include scalability, ease of introductory use and reduced upfront costs. In many ways public cloud usage is considered the easy button.

However, cloud computing does present many drawbacks that often come back to haunt users, such as skyrocketing fees, poor performance and security concerns. The decision between using a public cloud versus owning your own infrastructure is not so different than deciding between renting and a buying a home. It is a choice between controlling your own environment versus living within someone elses domain. The home owner (or public cloud provider) reaps the benefits of equity gains while the renter continues to pay someone elses mortgage.

Some enterprises choose cloud services for their scalability. Although the pricing model for cloud computing is pay for what you use and buy more computing power as your business demands, this may not be as cost-effective as it initially appears. Organizations that move significant amounts of data should think twice before moving to the cloud because bandwidth prices can be all over the map. Bandwidth prices for cloud computing can easily rack up unexpected costs, especially when dealing with performance and security setbacks.

In fact, trading algorithm developer Deep Value estimates that using Amazon EC2 is 380 percent more expensive than having an internal cluster. insideHPC.coms Rich Brueckner described the claim that cloud services could lower the cost of high-performance computing as being owed more to marketing hype than to reality.

The big three providers, Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform have massive buying power, however between them the average bandwidth price is 3 to 4 times higher than colocation facilities. Amazon does offer the ability to reduce some of the expense by offering reserved instances. However, this can cripple a companys cash flow. With all these added expenses, on premise hardware starts to make more financial sense, especially for businesses with predictable workloads.

Many IT departments choose cloud services to improve access for remote employees and find an inexpensive solution to run data center applications. Clouds have also been praised for handling non-sensitive needs and non- mission-critical data that are not utilized for long periods of time. They can be ideal for start-up or business-to-consumer companies who are not working with large amounts of sensitive data. However, public cloud services have always been large targets for breaches and attacks, especially if they are well- known and frequently used services like Amazon EC2. For Amazon Web Services

Users security can be automatically affected by anything that happens to their cloud provider. Additionally, anyone using a public or shared cloud can experience a data breach and information loss through no real fault of their own. This drawback makes public clouds a potential nightmare for enterprises running mission-critical applications with high-availability and compliance or regulatory requirements.

Cloud customers also encounter problems with performance and reliability. Using a public cloud means sharing a network with potentially noisy neighbors that hog resources. Given that cloud service providers have servers in several dispersed locations, users can also experience latency issues and are often forced to pay exorbitant fees for a solution to these issues. AWS customers, in particular, experience performance glitches with server virtualization. In contrast to bare-metal hardware users, public cloud customers have limitations on resource availability and may struggle with application performance and data transfer rates. The solution from service providers pay more money for premium access only adds to the headaches.

Several factors determine when it is time to leave a public cloud and deploy on premise infrastructure. At the top of this list is the monthly spending statement. For some companies the $30,000 monthly Amazon bill is the threshold at which it is time to consider a move from the public cloud. For other companies, the decision to move away from a public cloud is tied to performance and security issues. In-house infrastructure allows companies to control their computing environments to best ensure application successleading to performance that is much more predictable and consistent. As a result, deploying on premise infrastructure is best for high-scale IT environments that process a lot of data, especially if that data is consistently growing. Organizations also have the option of building dedicated servers for workload-specific needs.

In a Wired magazine article, Dropbox outlined their journey leaving Amazon. According to Dropboxs Vice President of Engineering, Aditya Agarwal, Nobody is running a cloud business as a charity. There is some margin somewhere. Companies working at a large enough scale can save huge sums of money by cutting out the public cloud provider. Companies should also be cautious that Amazon, with arms in such a vast number of industries, may in the future offer online applications that will compete against those of their own customers, something Dropbox noted as part of their decision making. Giving a potential competitor insight into your business model, applications and customer base could be a risky endeavor.

The conversation about where and how to store an organizations data is a hotly debated topic in IT. In some cases, the solution is a combination of services. While some enterprises may be better suited for in-house servers, others could certainly benefit from using a public cloud. Just as frequently, an organizations IT needs can be met by a hybrid of the two, such as implementing in-house servers to handle standard traffic which can burst to the cloud for additional capacity.

However, organizations need to seriously consider their own IT needs outside the hype of the cloud, placing focus particularly on specific applications. This includes prioritizing requirements for processing, performance, storage, security, data transfers and, of course, determining how much they are willing to spend on all factors.

There is an unmatched value in building and owning your infrastructure instead of living in someone elses environment. Companies should take a long-term approach of making their IT environment an asset rather than a cost center. Spending today on in-house infrastructure results in equity, and ultimately leads to long-term profits that will support the growth of not only the IT organization but the larger business of which it is a part.

Opinionsexpressed in the article above do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Data Center Knowledge and Penton.

Originally posted here:
When Clouds Break: the Hidden Dangers of Cloud Computing - Data Center Knowledge

Read More..

Cloud computing grabbing greater share of IT budgets – Health Data Management

Total spending on IT infrastructure products, including servers, enterprise storage systems and Ethernet switches, for deployment in cloud environments will increase 12 percent year over year in 2017 to $40.1 billion, according to a report from International Data Corp.

Public cloud data centers will account for the majority of this spending (61 percent) and will grow at the fastest rate year over year (14 percent). Off-premises private cloud environments will represent 15 percent of overall spending and will grow 12 percent year over year, IDC predicts.

Also See: Cloud computing market predicted to reach $41.7B

On-premises private clouds will account for 62 percent of spending on private cloud IT infrastructure and will grow 10 percent year over year in 2017, the research firm estimates.

Increased spending on cloud IT technology and decreasing investments in non-cloud IT infrastructure will be a common theme for all regions, IDC said. Worldwide spending on traditional, non-cloud IT infrastructure will decline 5 percent in 2017, accounting for 59 percent of overall end-user spending on IT infrastructure products across the three segments, down from 63 percent in 2016.

"The overall profile of spending on IT infrastructure in various deployment/location scenarios seen in 2016 will continue in 2017, with some differences in specific technology segments," said Natalya Yezhkova, research director of enterprise storage at IDC.

"Enterprise adoption of hybrid and multi-cloud IT strategies and the proliferation of cloud-native applications and areas such as the Internet of Things (IoT), which embrace a cloud-first approach to supporting IT resources, will fuel further increases in end-user spending on services-based IT, Yezhkova adds.

In turn, this move will be reflected in a shift of the overall spending on IT infrastructure from on-premises to off-premises deployments and from traditional IT to cloud IT," she concludes.

Bob Violino is a freelance technology and business writer who covers a variety of topics, including big data and analytics, cloud computing, information security and mobile technology.

Read the original post:
Cloud computing grabbing greater share of IT budgets - Health Data Management

Read More..