Page 4,066«..1020..4,0654,0664,0674,068..4,0804,090..»

The impact of artificial intelligence on humans – Bangkok Post

Will the machines take control? Not if we focus on developing the skills that AI cannot replicate

From Siri, the virtual assistant in Apple mobile devices, to self-driving cars, artificial intelligence (AI) is progressing rapidly, outperforming humans at some tasks. As with the majority of the changes happening globally, there will be positive and negative impacts as AI continues to shape the world we live in. Every single one of us will have to reckon with our ability to balance the human way of life and the transition to the AI cosmos.

According to a report by the technology research group IDC, spending on AI is expected to reach US$46 billion by 2020 with no signs of slowing down. AI is definitely on the rise in both business and life in general. The question is, will humans eventually lose control as machines become super-intelligent? Unforeseen consequences are likely whenever a new technology is introduced, and AI is no exception.

It is obvious that AI is a disruptive technology, revolutionising businesses and bringing new approaches to decision-making based on measurable outcomes. It can enhance efficiency and production volume, while cultivating new opportunities for revenue to flourish.

We have to face the fact that humans arent always the best at tedious and repetitive tasks, whereas machines dont get tired or complain. This is where AI is starting to play an important role: freeing humans from drudgery so that we can focus on interpersonal relations and more creative work.

Is it true that robots and AI will destroy jobs? That is something we hear quite often. Everyone has their own opinions about the pluses and minuses of the technology. However, if you think about it in a positive way, AI is actually encouraging evolution in the job market, as candidates come to realise they need to develop new types of skills in order to secure fulfilling work amid rapid technological advancements.

The truth is, people will still work, but they will work better with the assistance of AI. In other words, the unparalleled duo of human and machines coming together will soon turn into the new normal in the workforce. Already there are many routine white-collar tasks such as answering emails, data entry and related responsibilities that can be handled by intelligent assistants if businesses are prepared to recognise the potential.

Away from the office, we can see that more and more people are living in smart homes or equipping their residences with hardware and software that can reduce energy usage and provide better security, among other benefits. AI is also having a profound impact on healthcare, leading to improved diagnosis and treatment of many conditions, leading to healthier citizens and healthier economies.

The ability of technology to answer more questions, solve more problems and innovate in previously unimaginable ways goes beyond the capacity of the human brain for better or worse, depending on how one perceives this subject. The elevation of technology will allow individuals to focus on higher functions, with improved quality living standards.

Challenges will continue to come and go, but the biggest one will be for humans to find their place in this new world, by staking a claim to all the activities that call for their unique human abilities.

A study by PwC forecast that 7 million existing jobs will be replaced by AI in the UK from 2017 to 2037. However, 7.2 million new jobs could be created as well. Yes, many humans are wondering whether they will be part of the 7 million or part of the 7.2 million. Living with this uncertainty is a struggle for many given the transformative impact of AI on our society and the economic, political, legal and regulatory implications that need to be prepared for.

At its core, AI is about imitating human thought processes. Human beings essentially have to teach AI the how-to of practically everything, but AI cannot be taught how to be empathic, something only humans can do. It is one thing to allow machines to predict and help solve problems; it is another to purposely make them control the ways in which people will be made redundant.

Therefore, it is vital for us to be more sceptical of AI and recognise its shortcomings together with its potential. By focusing more on training people in soft skills, starting in school, we can help produce a greater number of employable humans who will be able to work alongside machines to deliver the best of both worlds.

Arinya Talerngsri is Chief Capability Officer and Managing Director at SEAC - Southeast Asias Lifelong Learning Center. She can be reached by email at arinya_t@seasiacenter.com or https://www.linkedin.com/in/arinya-talerngsri-53b81aa. Explore and experience our lifelong learning ecosystem today at https://www.yournextu.com

Read more here:

The impact of artificial intelligence on humans - Bangkok Post

Read More..

AI IN BANKING: Artificial intelligence could be a near $450 billion opportunity for banks – here are the strat – Business Insider India

Discussions, articles, and reports about the AI opportunity across the financial services industry continue to proliferate amid considerable hype around the technology, and for good reason: The aggregate potential cost savings for banks from AI applications is estimated at $447 billion by 2023, with the front and middle office accounting for $416 billion of that total, per Autonomous Next research seen by Business Insider Intelligence.

Most banks (80%) are highly aware of the potential benefits presented by AI, per an OpenText survey of financial services professionals. In fact, many banks are planning to deploy solutions enabled by AI: 75% of respondents at banks with over $100 billion in assets say they're currently implementing AI strategies, compared with 46% at banks with less than $100 billion in assets, per a UBS Evidence Lab report seen by Business Insider Intelligence. Certain AI use cases have already gained prominence across banks' operations, with chatbots in the front office and anti-payments fraud in the middle office the most mature.

The companies mentioned in this report are: Capital One, Citi, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, Personetics, Quantexa, and U.S. Bank

Here are some of the key takeaways from the report:

In full, the report:

Interested in getting the full report? Here are two ways to access it:

Follow this link:

AI IN BANKING: Artificial intelligence could be a near $450 billion opportunity for banks - here are the strat - Business Insider India

Read More..

Artificial Intelligence in 2020: The Architecture and the Infrastructure – Gigaom

Featured SpeakersJed DoughertyGlobal VP of Field Engineering, DataikuRegister

Machine Learning and AI were hot in 2019, but whats next for AI in 2020? The software side of working with AI improved a lot this year. But the hardware infrastructure side is still pretty complex, and for those who want to take advantage of GPU technology, that goes double. The truth is that AI hardware, both for fast training and effective inferencing, can be expensive, and its obsolescence cycles are quick. Thats a blocker.

But the cloud, container technology and smart software to orchestrate it all can help. Intelligent auto-scaling can help as well. Economically efficient management of specialized hardware and multi-cloud container computing strategies are the next frontier in AI. Theyre also key to AIs continued journey to the mainstream.

To learn more, join us for this free 1-hour webinar from GigaOm Research. The webinar features GigaOm analyst Andrew Brust with Jed Dougherty, Global VP of Field Engineering at Dataiku, an enterprise AI and machine learning platform.

In this 1-hour webinar, you will discover:

Register now to join GigaOm and Dataiku for this free expert webinar.

Who Should Attend:

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

StateStateAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaGuamHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirgin IslandsVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingOther

CountryCountryUnited StatesCanadaAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia-HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCape VerdeCayman IslandsChadChileChinaChristmas IslandColombiaComorosCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCote d'IvoireCroatiaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEast TimorEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea (South)Korea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacauMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRwandaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSamoa (Independent)San MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSpainSri LankaSt. HelenaSurinameSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVatican CityVenezuelaViet NamVirgin Islands (U.S.)Western SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabweOther

Phone Number

Organization

Job Title

IndustryIndustryAccountingAdvertising/Marketing/PRAerospace & DefenseBanking & SecuritiesCall Center OutsourcingConsultingEducationEnergy, Chemical, UtilitiesFinancial Services - OtherGovernment - FederalGovernment - State & LocalHigh Tech - HardwareHigh Tech - ISPHigh Tech - OtherHospital, Clinic, Doctor OfficeHospitality, Travel, TourismInsuranceLegalManufacturingMedical, Pharma, BiotechReal EstateRetailSoftware - FinanceSoftware - HealthcareSoftware - OtherSupport OutsourcingTelecommunicationsTransportation & DistributionVAR/Systems Integrator

Number of EmployeesNumber of Employees1-2021-5051-100101-250251-500501-1,0001,001-5,0005,001-10,000More than 10,000

By submitting this form your are agreeing to our Privacy Policy.

Read more from the original source:

Artificial Intelligence in 2020: The Architecture and the Infrastructure - Gigaom

Read More..

How Countries Are Betting on to Become Supreme in Quantum Computing – Analytics Insight

Quantum Computing in recent times has sparkled the discussion around its adoption by companies and even countries. The hype around this, significantly, increased as search engine Google recently announced that it had achieved quantum supremacy. The discussion around quantum computing is also on the rise because countries interest in this has grown considerably. China and the United States vie on many fronts, but in the quantum world, China seems to exceed the US as its investment that consists of quantum computing also includes quantum information systems.

Todays quantum supremacy race delineates the day when quantum computers will be working in the field of medical, automotive, finance, among others in order to solve the knotty problems that classical computers are unable to do. Every time, in the quantum world, a quantum bit (qubit) is added, and the amount of information is doubled.

Googles quantum computer, that has 53 functioning qubits, has proven to be significantly faster than the most powerful classical computer in the world owned by IBM. As per the report, Googles quantum computing system, named Sycamore, was able to solve an intricate problem in 200 seconds. Conversely, it claimed the same issue which otherwise would require conventional computers to solve a span of about 10, 000 years.

Quantum supremacy, that companies and countries are competing for, refers to the point at which a quantum computer can make calculations beyond the most powerful classical computer conceivable. For the last few years, several countries have been pouring massive capital in this space that might be of particular interest.

Two years ago, in 2017, China announced to open a 92-acre National Laboratory for Quantum Information Sciences that is set to become reality by 2020. For this research center, the country sanctioned US$10 billion.

In the same year, a joint, state-sponsored research project with Japans National Institute of Informatics and the University of Tokyo produced the machine, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (NTT), shared a prototype quantum computer for public use over the internet. On the other hand, in 2017, Sweden invested 1 billion Swedish Krona (nearly US$118 million) into a research initiative with the purpose to build a robust quantum computer.

However, reports claim that the United States has not invested enough in quantum computing. But over the summer, academia and industry showed effort before the U.S. House Subcommittees on Research & Technology and Energy to upsurge investment into it. According to Dr. Christopher Monroe, Quantum Physics professor, U.S. leadership in quantum technology will be critical to the national security and will open new doors for private industry and academia while ensuring Americas role as a global technology leader in the 21st century.

Moreover, two federal initiatives are underway to streamline and coordinate private and public research in quantum computing and other quantum-related projects. The first one is the National Quantum Initiative Act, a law that passed last year and the other one is a White Paper spelling out a national strategy to make sure America maintains supremacy in the technology over its counterparts, particularly China.

View post:
How Countries Are Betting on to Become Supreme in Quantum Computing - Analytics Insight

Read More..

Microsoft and AT&T reveal the 1st major initiative to come out of their big cloud-5G partnership – GeekWire

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and John Donovan, the former AT&T Communications CEO who retired in October. (Microsoft Photo)

Microsoft and AT&T today unveiled the first big plan as part of their multi-year cloud alliance: Combining AT&Ts burgeoning 5G network with Microsofts edge computing services to speed up Internet of Things devices processing power.

The two companies are working together on new Network Edge Compute technology, opening a preview in Dallas with plans to expand to Los Angeles and Atlanta next year. The technology will eventually allow high-powered devices, such as augmented reality glasses, autonomous cars and drones to get smaller and more nimble because most of the processing will be done over the 5G network, eliminating the need for big computers to be installed on the gadgets themselves.

With our 5G and edge computing, AT&T is collaborating uniquely with Microsoft to marry their cloud capabilities with our network to create lower latency between the device and the cloud that will unlock new, future scenarios for consumers and businesses, Mo Katibeh, executive vice president and chief marketing officer of AT&T Business, said in a statement. Weve said all year developers and businesses will be the early 5G adopters, and this puts both at the forefront of this revolution.

The two companies announced their partnership back in July. The deal, which Reuters reported is worth more than $2 billion, will see Microsoft become AT&Ts preferred cloud provider.

AT&T will migrate most of its non-network workloads to Microsofts Azure cloud servers by 2024. AT&T is in the midst of outfitting tens of thousands of employees with Microsoft 365 apps, including Microsoft Teams, SharePoint and OneDrive, as well as Windows 10, the companies said.

The two companies have teamed up before on atracking and detection system for drones, network projects and blockchain solutions. Microsoft and AT&T promised more initiatives for both businesses and consumers in the coming months and years.

In addition to the tech partnership, the companies said in July they would team up on social good initiatives. There was no mention of any social good projects in todays update, but the companies have said they are both focused on addressing sustainability, accessibility, and community challenges such as homelessness and see an opportunity to support each others work to address urgent social needs.

Both companies are in the midst of fierce technological competitions. Microsofts cloud division is trying to catch up to the incumbent power Amazon Web Services and notched a big win last month when it secured the $10 billion Pentagon JEDI contract. AT&T is locked in a 5G race with Verizon and a potential combined force of T-Mobile and Sprint.

AT&T said its 5G network today serves 21 cities, with a nationwide expansion planned for next year. Rival T-Mobile plans to launch its nationwide 5G network Dec. 6.

Read the original:
Microsoft and AT&T reveal the 1st major initiative to come out of their big cloud-5G partnership - GeekWire

Read More..

Amazon Is Reportedly Preparing to Launch Its Second Custom Server Chip – The Motley Fool

A year ago, Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) introduceda custom Arm-based processor called Graviton to help power workloads at Amazon Web Services (AWS), the company's booming and highly profitable cloud infrastructure business. Amazon had acquired Israel-based chip designer Annapurna Labs in 2015 for an estimated$350 million, paving the way for the tech juggernaut's custom silicon strategy.

"A few years ago the team started to think about building an Amazon-built custom CPU designed for cost-sensitive scale-out workloads," AWS Chief Evangelist Jeff Barr wrote at the time. Amazon is now reportedly preparing its second-generation custom server chip for prime time.

Image source: Getty Images.

Reuters reported last week that AWS is almost done working on the chip, which is expected to be approximately 20% faster than the first-generation silicon. AWS is the largest cloud infrastructure provider in the world, giving it a greater incentive to pursue cost-saving measures by bringing chip development in-house, despite the billions that is necessary to invest in custom chip design.

The move will also help reduce Amazon's dependence on Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), which dominates the server chip market. Advanced Micro Deviceshas been making inroads, but Intel still commanded over95% market share in the third quarter, according to Mercury Research.

The second-generation chip is expected to use Arm's Neoverse N1 architecture, according to the report. That chip techis designed specifically for data centers, offering 2.5 times the performance for data center workloads while improving power efficiency compared to Arm's Cortex A72 architecture, which Graviton is based on. Amazon might double the number of computing cores from 16 to 32, a source told the outlet.

Data centers are critically important for both Amazon and Intel. AWS generated nearly $2.1 billion in operating income lastquarter, or 56% of Amazon's consolidated operating profits despite representing just 12% of revenue. Intel's Data Center Group (DCG) similarly carries outsize profitability, accounting for 48% of operating income in the thirdquarter and 33% of sales.

Apple kicked off the custom chip trend a decade ago -- the Cupertino behemoth is also working on Arm-based chips that could one day displace Intel processors in Macs -- and now designs nearly all of its most important components for the iPhone. Alphabet subsidiary Google has its custom Titan security chip, Facebook is hiring semiconductor engineers to make custom chips, and most recently Microsoft jumped on the bandwagon with a custom SQ1 chip that powers its new Surface Pro X.

Custom silicon is only a viable strategy for large, deep-pocketed tech companies, considering the hefty development costs. Over time, the hope is that those investments pay off in the form of optimized performance and lower operating costs.

Read the rest here:
Amazon Is Reportedly Preparing to Launch Its Second Custom Server Chip - The Motley Fool

Read More..

What Impact Can Data Backup and Recovery Trends Have on Organizations? – Enterprise Security Mag

By Enterprise Security Magazine | Monday, December 02, 2019

The solutions used in data backup and recovery are outdated, and it is time to consider new trends.

FREMONT, CA:Data is every company's most valuable asset. It is not surprising that companies allocate substantial budgets to protect and preserve it. Companies are looking for new data storage concepts with growing data volumesnot only storage but also the ability to access it more quickly when they need it. In fact, multiple alternatives should be offered at a reasonable price. Such demands push the vendors of recovery and backup solutions to innovate and scale. Here are a few trends in backup and recovery that can best meet the needs of any organization.

Hybrid Cloud

For several reasons, the hybrid cloud has gained popularity as a perfect solution for disaster recovery. While the public cloud can help companies as a budget-friendly solution, compliance and security issues preclude sensitive data and other confidential business records from being stored in the public cloud. The private cloud, on the other hand, is costly and may not be practical for low-budget businesses. In such situations, a hybrid cloud maintains balance by integrating the privileges of the public, private and on-premise solutions.

Automation

No doubt, most companies have automated some of their backups and storage processes. Addressing the growing security breaches is not sufficient but also automating any vital backup process. But device-based cloud storage backup ensures automatic backup takes place, for example, the cloud data are immediately backed up so that they can be retrieved regardless of the details uploaded. Companies can, therefore, take control of their crucial business data while preventing data loss and achieving scalability and efficiency.

Artificial Intelligence

In designing and data centers' ongoing management and products there, AI plays a vital role. Mainly, AI helps reduce database shortfalls in server usage by dividing workloads across servers. This enhances security by tracking the systems and shielding devices from threats 24/7. Ai can also reduce power consumption by spinning discs if necessary without affecting performance.

With the emerging threats, enterprises' demands are rising, and vendors will continually innovate their data backup and disaster recovery solutions to meet customer needs.

Read Also

Read more:
What Impact Can Data Backup and Recovery Trends Have on Organizations? - Enterprise Security Mag

Read More..

C3 Group rebuilds its private cloud on Lenovo and wins on-prem – CRN Australia

Regional New South Wales MSP C3 Group has rebuilt its cloud platform, and found that doing so helps it to win clients with ongoing on-premises requirements.

That may sound counterintuitive, but C3 managing director Brian Townley told CRN that many of his companys clients have on-prem applications that just wont go away.

Sometimes it is legacy apps relating to specialised hardware, especially manufacturing equipment, he explained. Some aged care applications arent ready to go into the cloud too.

And sometimes it just makes no sense to send a company to the cloud.

We might look after an organisation that has a single office for all of its staff. Why put that in the cloud when it is only ever accessed on that one site? They dont have a need to change from the infrastructure they use.

C3s approach has therefore been to build a private cloud that mirrors the tech its clients use on premises.

The companys just refreshed that cloud, building it on Lenovo hardware and Microsofts Azure Stack HCI.

We can replicate that in customer environments, Townley told CRN. Most of our customers have the same setup we run, and we can manage consistently across both environments.

If a C3 client choses to remain on-prem, C3 can therefore manage their setup and also offer the telephony, backup, security and other services in its portfolio.

Clients can also choose to run in the C3 cloud and take advantage of its IaaS services, and the ability to reach the wider Azure public cloud.

Townley told CRN that C3s new cloud was comfortably the largest investment the company had ever made. But hes confident it was a good investment because he thinks running a private cloud is a key differentiator.

Having our own private cloud gives us the flexibility that others do not have, he says. We can do it all in-house. I see public cloud is being super-commoditised.

Our customers like that we are their administrators and that the buck stops with us. In the future we could include more public cloud Azure in our offerings. For now customers prefer our option.

Nuts and bolts

C3 Groups cloud is built on Lenovo servers and runs Windows Server 2019 and Storage Space Direct.

Townley said the MSP chose the platform because licensing costs were superior to rival hyperconverged platforms. Lenovo offered a validated solution, which helped too!

The companys cloud resides in a Sydney Equinix data centre. While C3 does not have full time staff in Sydney, Townley said there are sufficient flights to Sydney from its Coffs Harbour and Port Macquarie offices that it can get any hands-on work done in a timely fashion.

View original post here:
C3 Group rebuilds its private cloud on Lenovo and wins on-prem - CRN Australia

Read More..

Korea IT H/W: Key Takeaways From Our Q4 2019 Visits To Japan/Taiwan – Seeking Alpha

2020 hyperscale server demand to grow 11% YoY; DRAM contract prices to pick up from 2Q20

We visited major IT H/W companies in Taiwan and Japan from Nov 11 to 15 to examine the key issues of the IT H/W sector. Through the visits we found that: 1) 2020 demand for finished products is expected to stagnate but hyperscale demand should grow 11% YoY on expanding 5G services and data center demand, helping to drive DRAM prices higher; 2) Samsung Electronics (OTC:SSNLF) will gain more prowess in the smartphone space with its foldable display and high-resolution cameras (64MP or higher); Huawei's marginalized presence in the overseas markets also benefits Samsung; and 3) MLCC inventory has entered the normal range in 4Q19 and price declines have slowed considerably; price hikes of ultra-small, high capacitance MLCCs are under way.

Hyperscale's share of servers and server DRAM to grow up to 60% and 78%, respectively

Hyperscale servers used by data centers and telcos currently account for 38% of total server demand but we believe the number will increase up to 60% by 2025. Hyperscale server DRAM's percentage of total server DRAM is also expected to climb to 78% by 4Q20. As data center investments pick up pace led by North America's cloud providers, OVHcloud, and China's BAT, server DRAM is likely to represent 35% of total DRAM demand in 2020.

Korean IT H/W sector to grow more attractive next year, top picks Samsung and SEMCO

We believe Korea's IT H/W sector will continue to be an attractive investment next year given the expansion of 5G services, memory chip price hikes, and the launch of the foldable smartphones, the embodiment of the "super-gap" strategy. We present Samsung and SEMCO (OTC:SMSGF) as our top picks. We favor Samsung the most, followed by SEMCO, SK Hynix (OTC:HXSCL), LG Innotek, and LG Electronics (OTC:LGEIY).

5G and hyperscale servers to drive 2020 memory semicon prices higher

We visited major IT H/W manufacturers and research institutions such as DRAMeXchange, Stone Partners, and InnoResearch in Japan and Taiwan from Nov 11 to 15 to examine current industry issues such as: 1) the 2020 memory semiconductor market outlook; 2) the competitive focus of the smartphone market in 2020 in terms of specifications; and 3) the supply/demand dynamics of MLCCs.

DRAM contract prices are likely to start to rebound in 2Q20 after sliding until 1Q20. We project DRAM contract prices will rise more than 20% YoY in 4Q20. After a rebound in 4Q19, NAND prices should correct in 1H20 before regaining momentum in 3Q20. In 4Q20, we estimate TLC NAND wafer prices will have risen 17% YoY. In 2020, helped by efforts to contain supply, the DRAM and NAND markets are expected to grow 3.8% and 18% YoY to USD69.7bn and 53.3bn, respectively. Meanwhile, the 2020 hyperscale server shipment volume will likely increase 11% YoY to 5.2mn units, and hyperscale servers should account for 78% of server DRAM demand. 2020 will also see the debut of Intel's (INTC) 14nm-based Cooper Lake processors, and 1H21 will witness the launch of the 10nm-based Ice Lake CPU.

Samsung Electronics' Galaxy S11 is expected to come with LPDDR5 DRAM and rear cameras with no less than 64MP. The S11+ will offer an even higher resolution of up to 108MP. The one with 108MP cameras will have the folded camera module technology, and its mobile DRAM capacity will probably be over 12GB. In 2020, Samsung is expected to launch two foldable smartphone models and plans to widen the gap with competitors by selling at least 5mn foldable smartphones. Meanwhile, at Apple (AAPL), the strong sales of the iPhone 11, which offers an LCD display, appear to be hampering Apple's original plan of making all the 2020 models in OLED. There is a growing possibility that the new products to come out in 2H20 will include a 6.06-inch LCD model. As for Huawei, the inability to use the Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) (GOOGL) OS will erode its 2020 export volume by 50mn units, which bodes well for Samsung and Apple.

After our visit to a Taiwan-based MLCC maker, we now believe MLCC inventory that had increased to 150 days at one point will contract to a normal level of 70 days in 4Q19, which is expected to limit MLCC prices' QoQ decline in 4Q19 to 4%. In particular, the prices of ultra-small, high-capacitance MLCCs for smartphones are likely to increase from 4Q19 amid the rise of demand for 5G smartphones. An overall increase in MLCC prices will likely happen from 2Q20.

Korean tech shares have been outperforming the broader market since the beginning of the year. In 2020, we believe Korean IT H/W names will come into an even bigger spotlight compared with their global peers, considering: 1) favorable business conditions characterized by the expansion of 5G services and the rebound of memory semiconductor prices; 2) Huawei's dwindling presence in the smartphone space; and 3) BOE's weakening strength in OLED. Most importantly, the Samsung Galaxy Fold is the manifestation of the tech giant's "super-gap" strategy (a strategy of creating an insurmountable technological gap with competitors) and it is slated to enjoy bigger and bigger sales going forward, which will make Samsung an even more attractive investment. We present Samsung Electronics and SEMCO as our top picks for Korea's IT H/W sector. We like Samsung the most, followed by SEMCO, SK Hynix, LG Innotek, and LG Electronics.

We had a meeting with DRAMeXchange, which has been a good prognosticator of the DRAM market direction for the past two years. In terms of demand, it now expects no finished products to see meaningful growth in 2020 except for servers. However, it believes neither PCs nor smartphones will suffer sales declines. Despite the protracted US-China trade dispute, demand for finished products has kept up well, which in itself helps diminish uncertainties. In 2020, with the expansion of 5G services, it expects major public cloud service providers to scale up investments in data centers and telcos' mobile edge computing (MEC), which is in line with our view. That said, its forecast of supply bit growth seems too conservative. It estimates DRAM wafer capacity will be 1,288K wpm at end-2019 and 1,340K wpm (+4% YoY) at end-2020, but it expects YoY supply bit growth to be a meager 12.4% because it believes technology migrations will provide severe headwinds to all DRAM makers. However, in this era of 1X and 1Y, DRAMeXchange's supply bit growth forecast seems overly conservative. Aside from this, DRAMeXchange projects DRAM's demand bit growth to be 18%, backed by memory content growth in servers and smartphones. While it estimates overall ASP will slip 9.7% YoY in 2020, it believes the DRAM prices in 4Q20 will be more than 20% higher than DRAM prices in 4Q19. In short, it expects DRAM prices to soar as the DRAM sector faces supply shortages from 2Q20.

Meanwhile, Micron (MU), which currently operates two fabs in Taiwan, appears to be considering building a new fab in Taiwan after 2020. As seen by Samsung's Pyeongtaek #2 fab and SK Hynix's M16, Micron also expects DRAM demand to grow in the long term. We have a more positive view toward DRAM supply bit growth vs. DRAMeXchange. DRAMeXchange assumes Micron's bit growth in 2020 to be 10.3% while Micron itself projects 15%. DRAMeXchange expects the DRAM market to expand 3.8% YoY to USD69.7bn in 2020 with supply bit growth of 15%. Although DRAMeXchange has been correct many times recently in predicting the direction of DRAM market, its predictions were far from precise, because of the high volatility of the DRAM industry. Therefore, it would be prudent for investors to focus on the basic direction that the DRAM market will take.

Server demand was the key driver of 2018's historic-high DRAM demand. Amid an increase in public cloud companies' long-term agreements (LTAs) to build new data centers, the price of server DRAM (32GB) rose 139% from its trough. However, as the first round of investments by public cloud operators came to a close, server DRAM prices dropped 66% from the peak, breaking below the previous low. Server companies' DRAM inventories are likely to reach normal levels by end-2019, and server DRAM prices should start rebounding after bottoming in 1Q20. During the first server DRAM upcycle, DRAM prices rose for eight consecutive quarters; so it should be interesting to watch how long DRAM prices continue to rise. The investments by public cloud companies should not be as intense as the last time. However, considering the demand from private cloud companies and telcos' investments in edge servers, DRAM price increases may last longer than the last time, although the scale of increase should be weaker. We must not overlook the fact that, as witnessed during the first upcycle, once cloud companies decide to make an investment, they will invest even in the typical off-season for tech products. Taken together, we believe server DRAM will account for up to 34.9% of total DRAM shipments in 2020.

For mobile DRAM, LPDDR5 demand is expected to grow in earnest from 2020 along with 5G services, and a growing number of rear cameras on smartphones will further increase mobile DRAM content. In particular, Samsung's Galaxy S11 is expected to come with LPDDR5 DRAM and raise the rear camera pixels to over 64MP. The most expensive model is likely to incorporate the folded camera technology into its 108MP cameras. There are expectations that the said model will offer 12GB or higher mobile DRAM. If the Galaxy S11 manages to display a distinguished 5G speed by adopting LPDDR5 earlier than competitors, Chinese smartphone makers are also likely to rush to adopt LPDDR5.

Meanwhile, DRAMeXchange expects DRAM contract prices (in the case of PC DRAM) to climb 6% QoQ in 2Q20, 12% QoQ in 3Q20, and 8.8% QoQ in 4Q20. It believes server DRAM demand will display a similar level of increase. As for mobile DRAM, the price premium is more than 35% vs. PC DRAM, so the scale of increase will likely be lower than that of PC or server DRAM.

At Intel, 3Q19 results remained flat YoY as PC CPU shipments slid about 5% YoY, and operating profit fell 12% YoY amid the deterioration of NAND earnings. In 4Q19, Intel expects sales to grow 3% YoY to USD19.2bn and an operating margin of 2%p YoY. What merits our attention in Intel's earnings results are the Data Center Group indicators which are highly correlated with server CPU and the Client Computing Group indicators which are related with PC CPU. As for the Data Center Group, 3Q19 shipments declined 6% YoY but ASP rose 9%, which worked to boost sales by 4% YoY. The client breakdown of Data Center Group sales reveals that telco-bound sales rose for a second consecutive quarter with 3Q19 seeing an 11% YoY increase. The investments in 5G infrastructure by telcos in the US, Korea, and China are spurring demand for edge servers and hyperscale servers used in data centers. In particular, sales bound for cloud computing companies, which slipped 1% YoY in 2Q19, rose 3% YoY in 3Q19. Furthermore, the sales of server CPUs for enterprises and government offices increased 1%, a dramatic rise from the 31% decline seen in 2Q19. Meanwhile, Intel guides for YoY sales growth of 7% in 4Q19 for the Data Centric segment (server CPU + NAND + IoT + Mobileye + Security + others). Since server CPUs account for more than 65% of its Data Centric sales, server CPU sales are expected to grow at least 5% YoY.

We also visited Taiwan-based major server suppliers Aspeed and Inventec. Aspeed has an 80% share in the market for hyperscale server baseboard management controllers (BMC), so its sales lead the demand for memory semiconductors and CPUs for servers by more than two months. With that said, Aspeed's sales are at an all-time high from July to October. Although sales are likely to decrease MoM from November due to inventory adjustments by server companies, its annual sales are expected to increase 13% YoY in 2019. Contrary to some beliefs (orders are placed two or three times a year), ODM server companies place orders for BMCs on a monthly basis to meet client demand. In conclusion, Aspeed's robust earnings results in 3Q19 suggest that server companies' shipments will increase in 4Q19 on a meaningful scale. Meanwhile, server demand is expected to grow QoQ from 2Q20 after inventory controls in 1Q20. Meanwhile, this year's BMC shipments are expected to climb 6.3% YoY, and ODM companies' server shipments are likely to increase 5.1% YoY. Of note, Aspeed's sales growth is more than double the growth of BMC shipments because of growing demand for 28nm products.

Currently, hyperscale servers account for around 40% of total server sales. However, by 2025 when demand from cloud companies and telcos increase, hyperscale servers' portion of sales is expected to rise up to 60%, which is positive for memory semiconductor demand. Meanwhile, Inventec, which has the largest sales exposure to servers among Taiwanese ODMs, expects server demand to grow in the high-single digits from 2020, cloud server demand 10% and enterprise server demand around 5%. At present, among Taiwanese ODMs, Quanta Computer (OTC:QUCCF) appears to have 25% of sales generated from servers while for Inventec the number is estimated to be 34%. As for public cloud computing companies, dependence on such companies as HP, Dell, Lenovo, and Huawei has plummeted, and instead they get most of their servers from Taiwanese ODM/OEM companies (Inventec, Quanta, QCT, and Wiwynn). It is believed that China's Inspur and Lenovo supply most of hyperscale servers to the BAT (Baidu (BIDU), Alibaba (BABA), and Tencent (OTCPK:TCEHY)). On the other hand, Chinese telcos are believed to buy their servers mostly from Huawei while US telcos obtain their servers from Ericsson (ERIC) and Nokia (NOK). Meanwhile, Taiwanese ODMs' servers for telcos appear to be supplied to Cisco (CSCO) Systems and Juniper Networks (JNPR). Ericsson and Nokia are assumed to provide Cisco's optimized products to telcos' edge infra network. Edge computing servers have different specifications by base station and switching center. High-capacity servers are mostly installed in telcos' data centers, or switching centers that are adjacent to data centers. In contrast, base stations are believed to be equipped with low-capacity servers. In all, if data traffic increases exponentially through edge computing, the capacity of public cloud servers will naturally increase, which means additional investments in servers. 5G services are expected to drive server demand by increasing data consumption and creating fresh demand (e.g., autonomous vehicles and robots). Against this backdrop, we believe server DRAM will represent 48% of total DRAM demand by 2025.

Globally, the number of data centers is increasing rapidly amid explosive growth in demand for public and private clouds. By the end of 2019, the number of cities with data centers (based on public clouds) is expected to rise to 144, and the number should continue to grow, led by Google which is strengthening its gaming cloud business and its rivals such as Amazon and Microsoft. Currently, the company that has established the largest number of data centers worldwide is Europe's OVHcloud. It has data centers in 30 different cities worldwide and built 380,000 physical servers. Google, Microsoft (MSFT), and Amazon (AMZN) are also building more than eight data centers this year. Google, which is striving to strengthen its gaming cloud business, plans to establish 15 data centers in various cities including Seoul, Jakarta, Warsaw, LA, and Salt Lake City. Since speed is the key to gaming clouds, data centers that are nearby are always preferred over data centers that are far away. For Amazon and Alibaba, additional investments in data centers are a must as they lead the innovations in delivery and logistics.

The long-term direction of data center demand is positive but in the short term, what is important is that Intel delivers its server CPUs in a timely manner. We note that Intel has more than 95% market share in hyperscale servers. The delayed launch of Cascade CPUs by more than 10 months has led to a delay of cloud computing companies' server investments. While Intel is scheduled to release 10nm-based Ice Lake CPUs in 2H20, the actual release will probably be 1H21 considering circumstances. Having said that, the 2020 launch of the 14nm-based Cooper Lake with eight channels is a certainty. Accordingly, demand should improve compared to this year.

With the launch of Cooper Lake CPUs, hyperscale servers' per device DRAM memory content is expected to continue rising. Accordingly, hyperscale servers' share of server DRAM demand will jump from 56% in 4Q18 to 78% in 4Q20. With the expansion of 5G and various cloud computing services (public, private, hybrid), hyperscale servers' share of the server market is continuing to grow and hyperscale servers' memory content per device is increasing. As such, the direction of server DRAM demand looks positive in the long term.

In 4Q19, NAND contract prices are expected to rebound around 5% QoQ due to reduced supply following Kioxia's (formerly Toshiba Memory) Yokkaichi fab outage and production cuts by major NAND makers. As seen by Intel and Aspeed's guidance, the server demand in 4Q19 should work to boost enterprise SSD prices most sharply, and client SSD prices are also likely to rise more than 10% QoQ thanks to burgeoning notebook demand. However, a seasonal demand decline expected in 1H20 will probably send down NAND contract prices again in 1H20. That said, the pace of decline in 1Q20 and 2Q20 will be in the low single digits thanks to production cuts, and the prices are expected to rise again from 3Q20 on strong seasonality. In the case of smartphone storage, UFS 2.1 has grown to represent 20% of total demand while eMMC demand falters. UFS 3.0 is expected to account for 10% of total demand in 2020 on the increased use in premium smartphones.

Meanwhile, SSD's penetration is rapidly increasing, especially in client PCs amid the plunge in NAND prices. The market for enterprise SSD is also growing on the back of increasing demand from newly built data centers and telcos. We expect SSD to account for 44.3% of total NAND demand in 2019, and surpass smartphones to become the top application (accounting for 44.3% of demand) for NAND by 2023. In 2019, we believe the NAND market will contract 28% YoY to USD53.3bn due to steep price corrections. However, in 2020, NAND price declines are expected to decelerate, and the market should expand 18% YoY to USD53.3bn. The size is still low compared with 2018 but we still find it positive that growth will turn around.

The visit to Taiwanese companies gave us a chance to examine the current conditions at Chinese memory semiconductor manufacturers. It appears that JHICC has almost given up its memory semiconductor business due to US sanctions. ASML stopped supplying photolithography solutions to JHICC. On the other hand, it was reported that CXMT (formerly Innotron) will start the mass-production of 19nm DRAM later this year. However, the visit to the Taiwanese firms confirmed that CXMT's actual capacity is 20K wpm and that the company has not qualified any of the standards required by its clients. At the very least, as of end-October, it was still unable to deliver even PC DRAM samples to Huawei, Lenovo, and Asus. Its official plan is to expand the capacity to 40K wpm by mid-2020, but we believe the primary purpose of the plan is to receive funding from the Chinese local government.

YMTC, a subsidiary of China's Tsinghua Unigroup, has completed the development of 64-layer TLC and is now supposedly developing 128-layer TLC, which is expected to be used to make SSDs for client PC. Currently, controller IC is known to have been developed by Taiwan-based Silicon Motion and Phison; other Chinese local controller IC companies like Koke also appear to be working on the development of related applications. Meanwhile, YMTC currently has a plant in Wuhan and is preparing to build a new plant in Chengdu. The Chinese local government is trying hard to allure the company to come to the city by offering various incentives. Having said that, the reliability of YMTC's products needs to be verified in the future. Additionally, Tsinghua Unigroup announced a plan to build a DRAM plant in Chongqing, China, with a target to complete construction by 2021. The local government of Chongqing, like the Chengdu government, is also striving to have a memory semiconductor factory in the city but again it remains unclear as to whether technological hurdles are all overcome. To sum up, concerns about the growth of China's DRAM market seem to be exaggerated in many ways.

Apple's iPhone shipments in 2H19 are better than expected. Especially, the response to the iPhone 11, which is attractively priced and upgraded with a dual camera, has been more favorable than expected. Indeed, after visiting Sharp which supplies most of the dual cameras for the iPhone 11, we found that its camera module sales in 4Q19 would grow more than twofold QoQ, and Apple's orders have been more than 10% higher than expected. It is estimated that currently 90% of the dual cameras for the iPhone 11 are supplied by Sharp and 10% by OFilm. OFilm suffered some financial difficulties, but the worst seems to be over after the local government of Fujian took over its debt. In the meantime, the iPhone 11 series' production volume in 2H19 confirmed by Taiwanese EMS companies is estimated to be 77.6mn units, with LCD models making up close to 50%. The reason why the sales of LCD models are better than their predecessors is attractive price first and foremost. The naming (from iPhone XR to iPhone 11) also seems to have helped boost consumer sentiment.

Apple is expected to release the iPhone SE2, a 4.7-inch LCD model in 1H20. The size is easy to handle with one hand and the price should also be attractive. Since Huawei is bound to take a hit in the overseas market due to the lack of Google's Android OS, Apple will likely accelerate efforts to expand its market share. Meanwhile, Apple's original plan for 2H20 was to discontinue LCD models and have all three differently sized models (5.42-, 6.06- and 6.68-inch) in OLED. However, as LCD models are selling better than expected, it is considering an early release of the 6.06-inch SE3 in 2H20, which was initially planned for a 1H21 release, and delaying the launch of its 6.06-inch OLED model. If Apple makes such a decision, Samsung Display's flexible OLED shipments to Apple may stay flat YoY in 2020. What is clear now is that BOE, which is struggling with the Y-Octa technology, will be unable to supply Apple even in 2H20.

Huawei smartphones did quite well even after it was blacklisted by the US government. However, losing access to Google's OS in new smartphones dealt a devastating blow to its shipments. That YouTube and Google Maps are not available in overseas markets is especially critical. This has already forced Huawei to delay the overseas launch of the Mate 30. However, its market share in China is expected to rise to 50% in 2019 and 55% in 2020 on the back of patriotism marketing. Assuming 2020 smartphone sales in China at 380mn units and Huawei holds a 55% market share, Huawei's domestic shipments will be 210mn units and its export volume will be 10mn units. Because of the absence of Google OS, its export volume should plunge to 10mn from 60mn units, creating a void that Samsung and Apple will gladly fill. The problem is that if Huawei represents 210mn smartphone sales in China, other players such as Apple, Oppo, Vivo and Xiaomi will have to compete over the remaining 170mn market. There is a high possibility that the shipments of Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi will fall in 2020. Overseas, Oppo and Vivo have a negligible market share except for Southeast Asia, and Xiaomi's (OTCPK:XIACY) market presence is timid except for India. As such, there is a high probability that Samsung will easily exploit the European and Latin American markets without spilling any blood. Meanwhile, Samsung plans to entrust joint development manufacturing (JDM) to Chinese companies from 2020. The 2020 volume will likely be about 50mn units, all in LCD. Its JDM partner will probably be Wingtech, a current ODM for Huawei. Furthermore, Samsung plans to further strengthen its partnership with HQ. Apple's current EMS providers are three Taiwanese companies (Foxconn (OTCPK:FXCNY), Pegatron, and Wistron); of the three, Foxconn and Wistron have factories in India.

Huawei's smartphone production is 60% in-house and the rest is done by ODM and EMS providers such as Wingtech, Flextronics. Longcheer is believed to be an ODM provider for Xiaomi. Samsung's JDM models are expected to target the mid and low-end of the market, and the Vietnamese plant will mostly be dedicated to the production of premium smartphones. If Huawei's smartphone exports fall by 50mn units and if Samsung takes more than 70% of the market, the impact of Samsung's JDM on Korean component makers could be smaller than expected. Regardless, it is more important than ever for Korean parts suppliers to upgrade their product portfolios with a focus on premium components.

Meanwhile, the Galaxy Fold has been met with enthusiastic response since its debut. In addition to the fact that it folds magically, the Fold has been carefully made to perfection with three or three divided screens for multitasking, cutting edge camera performance and two batteries. Of course, the 4.6-inch external display is too small and thickness and weight need further improvements. That said, there is no doubt about the evolutionary direction of the Galaxy Fold, as Samsung has greatly improved its smartphone quality since the Galaxy S3. Meanwhile, Samsung unveiled the image of a clamshell style foldable smartphone at SDC 2019. It should be easier to mass produce vs. horizontally folding devices, and will be offered at more attractive prices compared with the Galaxy Fold 1. However, in terms of multitasking, horizontally folding smartphones are expected to be superior, and Samsung will likely unveil a new horizontally folding model in 2H20 with an enlarged external display. The Galaxy Fold provides the UX of both smartphones and tablets, and its display is expected to expand to more than 10 inches when unfolded, instead of 7.3 inches. Samsung will eventually fold the 10-inch model not just once but twice, through the development of the folding technology. Meanwhile, out-folding models and twice-folding "Z-Fold" smartphones introduced by Chinese names will find it hard to get past the prototype stage to reach the mass production stage. Huawei's Mate X is believed to have been sold out in China but the quantity is still unknown. As for Xiaomi, the release date has not even been set. Considering all circumstances, it is likely that Samsung will lead the foldable smartphone market by a wide margin for some time to come.

Meanwhile, the Galaxy S11 rear cameras, to be released in 1Q20, are expected to be available in 64MP to 108MP, and the 108MP model will be equipped with SEMCO's folded camera technology. On the other hand, the under display selfie cameras that Chinese players introduced are unlikely to be available in 2020 models due to technological difficulties.

Samsung's smartphone business is expected to enjoy both top- and bottom-line growth in 2020 on the back of: 1) the expansion of 5G services; 2) Huawei's faltering exports; 3) the launch of foldable smartphones; and 4) JDM.

BOE was a primary supplier for Huawei P30 Pro, but it is unclear as to whether it will do the same with Apple since Apple's new OLED models to be released in 2H20 will require the Y-Octa technology. Furthermore, Huawei's Mate 30 Pro, which curves around the edges at almost 90 degrees, are not available due to yield problems. As BOE struggles with the mass production of products that require a high level of technology, its technological gap with Samsung Display and LG Display is continuing to widen. While the P30 Pro requires eight masks, the Mate 30 Pro requires more than 10 masks, and the phone looks almost bezel-less when viewed from the front. Furthermore, the Mate 40 Pro to be launched in 2H20 folds at 120 degrees which is more difficult to make than the 90-degree model. In all, BOEs will be faced with more technological difficulties, not less. Meanwhile, Chinese smartphone names are recently considering using Samsung Display's hole punch display solution after grappling with the camera pop-up module's heavy cost burden and battery problems. As such, most mass-produced Chinese smartphone models in 2020 are expected to have hole punch displays, and BOE will again suffer technologically. In the meantime, Samsung Display will be able to distance competitors further in hole punch displays in addition to foldable displays.

Our visits to Taiwanese MLCC companies confirmed that the MLCC inventory would normalize by the year's end. Accordingly, we believe MLCC prices will stabilize in 2020 after bottoming out in 4Q19. MLCC inventory was extended up to 150 days in 4Q18 but by the year's end, it is expected to come down to 70 days. Meanwhile, Walsin saw a sales decline in 3Q19 as opposed to Yageo (OTC:YAGOY), due to the quality issue of the products that it supplies EMS. In October, Taiwanese MLCC makers saw their sales decline due to reduced number of working days following the Chinese National Day holidays. In November, however, sales should increase MoM and 4Q sales are expected to be flat QoQ. Taiwanese MLCC makers' exposure to China and sales distributors' share of sales have come down to normal levels. Thus, the MLCC price downcycle, triggered by Taiwanese MLCC names, appears to be coming to a close.

Yageo announced the acquisition of Kemet, a US-based company with strength in automotive, industrial, aerospace MLCCs, and tantalum capacitors (the company supplies under the Tokin brand in Korea and Japan). Yageo plans to finalize the deal by 2020 and plans to foray into the automotive and industrial capacitor markets. The automotive MLCC market is currently occupied largely by Murata (OTCPK:MRAAY) and TDK (OTCPK:TTDKY), with SEMCO and Yageo seeking to strengthen their presence. The automotive MLCC market is expected to grow exponentially going forward, given the soaring demand for EVs and ADAS. However, Yageo's acquisition of Kemet, a current supplier, is neutral on the market as product reliability is the most important issue in the market. Meanwhile, Murata's MLCC order backlog is recovering after bottoming in 1Q19. Recently, leading MLCC manufacturers are believed to attempt to raise the prices of ultra-small, high-capacitance MLCCs (mainly against Chinese smartphone makers), driven by increased demand for 5G smartphones.

Top picks Samsung and SEMCO; wait to bargain-hunt Hynix

Ongoing memory price declines and US-China tensions have weighed on earnings but Samsung and Hynix shares have significantly outperformed the broader market vs. at the beginning of the year. We believe this has to do with the market prematurely moving to price in the expectations for a rebound in memory chip prices in 2020 amid production controls and escalating 5G infrastructure investments. Additionally, there is growing optimism that edge computing related to 5G will boost AI demand and create fresh demand for DRAM.

Samsung has realized its "super-gap" strategic vision with the Galaxy Fold, which has helped quench the company's thirst for excess growth in areas other than memory semiconductors. The Galaxy Fold is especially significant in that it will drive the earnings of both the smartphone department and Samsung Display. In addition, while the semiconductor business is currently centered on memory semiconductors, there are growing expectations that the business will see growth in both top- and bottom-lines thanks to growing competence in 5G modem and CIS as well as an expanding client base seeking advanced technologies (7nm or lower EUV manufacturing process) through preemptive investments. In all, we expect Samsung to surge past its 2018 record earnings to report another record in 2022 as the earnings of semiconductors, smartphones and Samsung Display all grow in 2022. Hynix, on the other hand, needs to find fresh momentum in order to facilitate excess growth because shares have already priced in expectations for the DRAM cycle turnaround. In the case of NAND, it needs to enhance the profitability of its solutions. With expectations for a turnaround of memory semiconductors in 2020 already partly reflected into the price performance of both Samsung and Hynix, we believe Samsung is more attractive at this point since it has more potential for excess growth.

As for LGE, we recommend a trading strategy focusing on the seasonality of home appliances considering the continuing losses of the smartphone and VS divisions as well as intensifying competition in the TV set market. It is positive that LG Display's mobile OLED technology is getting better amid the expansion of white OLED capacity. As for SEMCO, we believe its folded camera module technology will gain attention as Samsung moves to increase the portion of smartphones with high-resolution rear cameras (64MP or higher) from next year. That the price declines of its cash cow MLCCs have lost steam is another plus. At LG Innotek, marginal business divisions have gone into restructuring and there is a possibility that the iPhone OLED model to be released in 2H20 will come with a rear ToF camera.

Korean IT shares have been outperforming the broader market. However, we believe the interest in the Korean IT H/W sector will grow even more in 2020 compared with global peers considering the expansion of the 5G services, memory chip price rebounds, Huawei's shrinking market share in the smartphone space, and BOE's struggles with OLED technology. Above all else, Samsung is likely to become a highly attractive investment as its "super gap" product Galaxy Fold is slated to enjoy larger sales.

Accordingly, among Korean IT H/W names, we favor Samsung the most, followed by SEMCO, Hynix, LG Innotek, and LG Electronics.

Meanwhile, the Taiwanese and Chinese server supply chains are also outperforming the market. Their stock momentum will likely remain solid as server demand is expected to recover in earnest from 2020.

Investment highlights

We maintain BUY and our six-month-forward target price of KRW61,000 (1.5x 2020F BPS) on Samsung Electronics. We now believe Samsung's 4Q19 consolidated sales and operating profit will come to KRW60.7tn and KRW6.3tn, falling short of our previous estimates by 0.5% and 6.3% due to a stronger KRW and weaker DRAM prices. In 1Q20, the launch of the Galaxy S11 is expected to shore up IM operating profit but overall operating profit will likely remain flat QoQ as unfavorable seasonality dampens semiconductor and display earnings. However, from 2Q20, server and PC DRAM price hikes should lead to a rebound of DRAM contract prices, and the increased shipments of hole-in-display flexible OLED will likely drive earnings higher. In 3Q20, operating profit should reach the KRW11tn mark first time in seven quarters as DRAM and NAND contract prices both rise. Samsung's DRAM and NAND bit growth in 2020, projected at 17.9% and 37.6%, will likely be faster than the market average. The IM division is expected to enjoy both qualitative and quantitative growth by shipping 314mn smartphones and 5mn Galaxy Folds, taking advantage of Huawei's contracting exports. Meanwhile, Samsung Display should begin supplying foldable display and flexible OLED display based on Y-Octa technology to Apple in 2H20. Samsung Display's earnings are expected to pick up in earnest as it begins to supply its single-hole punch display to Huawei, Oppo and Vivo.

Major issues and earnings outlook

Converting its DRAM Line 13 into an image sensor capacity is a necessary step toward increasing the shipments of high resolution image sensors, and we believe the move will help significantly boost the shipments of CMOS image sensors with high megapixel counts (64MP or higher). As the shipments of 5G modems, PMIC and RFIC also rise, system semiconductor earnings should remain on the solid growth track. We believe 2020 will mark the first year when growth is seen across all four major divisions-memory semiconductors, system semiconductors, smartphones, and displays.

Share price outlook and valuation

We recommend a buy-and-hold strategy as the four major growth engines are starting to pick up steam.

SK Hynix: Hyperscale market is getting bigger and bigger

Investment highlights

We reiterate BUY on SK Hynix and raise our target price from KRW98,000 (1.5x 2019F BPS) to KRW100,000 (1.4x 2020F BPS attributable to controlling interest). We now believe Hynix will report KRW6.68tn in 4Q19 consolidated sales and KRW379.8bn in operating profit, each 2.2% and 46% lower than our previous estimates, amid a stronger KRW and steeper-than-expected drop in DRAM contract prices. However, after hitting the bottom in 4Q19, we believe operating profit will sequentially improve from 2Q20 onwards. We expect operating profit to recover to KRW961bn in 2Q20 on DRAM contract price hikes and the considerable narrowing of NAND losses. In 3Q20, we estimate operating profit will reclaim the KRW2tn level as DRAM and NAND contract prices are both expected to increase more than 7% QoQ. While the dwindling smartphone exports of Huawei, one of Hynix's strategic clients, is a cause for concern, we believe Huawei will be able to offset the decline in exports with robust demand in the domestic market. Additionally, as Chinese telcos move to build the 5G infrastructure, Hynix's server DRAM sales to Huawei should surge in 2020. It is believed that Huawei accounts for more than 80% of servers supplied to Chinese mobile carriers.

Major issues and earnings outlook

Among the three major DRAM manufacturers, Hynix has the largest exposure to server DRAM. Accordingly, it is poised to benefit the most from the robust growth (+10.5% YoY) of hyperscale server demand to be generated by data centers and telcos from 2020 onwards. We believe hyperscale server demand will represent up to 78% of server DRAM demand on the back of the growth of average per device memory content. As for NAND, solutions products are likely to become more competent on client diversification for controller IC. We expect the NAND business to turn to profit in 3Q20 when NAND contract prices gain strong upside momentum.

Share price outlook and valuation

We recommend a buy-and-hold strategy in light of the recovery of hyperscale server demand.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: Hyundai Motor Company is a passive shareholder in our bank.

See the original post here:
Korea IT H/W: Key Takeaways From Our Q4 2019 Visits To Japan/Taiwan - Seeking Alpha

Read More..

An unsecured Elasticsearch server exposed 1.2 billion user records containing their personal and social information – Packt Hub

Last month, Vinny Troia, the founder of Data Viper and Bob Diachenko, an independent cybersecurity consultant discovered a wide-open Elasticsearch server. The server exposed the personal information of about 1.2 billion unique users including their names, email addresses, phone numbers, LinkedIn and Facebook profile information.

The Elasticsearch server did not have any kind of authentication whatsoever and was accessible via a web browser. No password or authentication of any kind was needed to access or download all of the data, the report adds.

Troia and Diachenko came across the Elasticsearch server while looking for exposures on the web scanning services BinaryEdge and Shodan. Upon further investigation, the researchers speculated that the data originated from two different data enrichment companies: People Data Labs and OxyData.io.

Data enrichment, as the name suggests, is a process of enhancing the existing raw data to make it useful for businesses. Data enrichment companies can provide access to large stores of data merged from multiple third-party sources, which enables businesses to gain deeper insights into their current and potential customers.

Elasticsearch stores its data in an index, which is similar to a database in a relational database. The researchers found that the majority of the data spanned four separate data indexes, labeled PDL and OXY. Also, each user record was labeled with a source field that matched either PDL or Oxy, respectively.

After the researchers de-duplicated the nearly 3 billion user records with the PDL index, they found roughly 1.2 billion unique people and 650 million unique email addresses. These numbers matched with the statistics provided by the company on their website.

The data within the three PDL indexes included slightly varied information. While some focused on scraped LinkedIn information, email addresses and phone numbers, others included information on individual social media profiles such as a persons Facebook, Twitter, and Github URLs. After analyzing the data under the OXY index, the researchers found scrape of LinkedIn data, including recruiter information.

What made the case confusing was that the Elasticsearch server was hosted on Google Cloud Services, while People Data Labs appears to be using Amazon Web Services. When contacted about the Elasticsearch server, both the companies denied that the server belonged to them.

In an interview with Wired, PDL co-founder Sean Thorne said, The owner of this server likely used one of our enrichment products, along with a number of other data-enrichment or licensing services. Once a customer receives data from us, or any other data providers, the data is on their servers and the security is their responsibility. We perform free security audits, consultations, and workshops with the majority of our customers.

This news sparked a discussion on Hacker News. While some users were stunned by the sheer negligence of leaving the Elasticsearch server wide-open, others were questioning the core business model of these companies.

A user commented, It has to exist on a private network behind a firewall with ports open to application servers and other es nodes only. Running things on a public IP address is a choice that should not be taken lightly. Clustering over the public internet is not a thing with Elasticsearch (or similar products).

Its a tragedy that all of this data was available to anyone in a public database instead of. checks notes available to anyone who was willing to sign up for a free account that allowed them 1,000 queries. It seems like PDLs core business model is irresponsible regarding their stewardship of the data theyve harvested, another user added.

Read the full report on Data Vipers official website.

Adobe confirms security vulnerability in one of their Elasticsearch servers that exposed 7.5 million Creative Cloud accounts

Following Capital One data breach, GitHub gets sued and AWS security questioned by a U.S. Senator

US Customs and Border Protection reveal data breach that exposed thousands of traveler photos and license plate images

Read more here:
An unsecured Elasticsearch server exposed 1.2 billion user records containing their personal and social information - Packt Hub

Read More..