Page 3,985«..1020..3,9843,9853,9863,987..3,9904,000..»

2020 predictions for gold, bitcoin and other precious metals – Money Observer

With equities still on a bull run like no other, it would be reasonable to say that commodities might not be top of the buy list for private investors.

But if you are looking for a slug of diversification to add to your portfolio there are three commodities that might attract the interest of savvy investors.

Top of the list is gold, which has had a fabulous run in 2019, returning 21%. That progress may not continue at such an elevated rate, but expect further appreciation.

Less keenly followed but definitely one to watch is precious metal palladium which is now more expensive than gold.

And then theres the wildcard play: rare earth minerals. In fact, the ores of the metals collectively known as rare earths arent actually that rare; rather, the deposits with high enough concentrations of the 17 rare earth elements to make it economic to mine are few. Recent moves in the US to secure a home-based supply chain prompt interest here.

We will come back to our three picks later. But first, what of other commodities such as oil and agriculture?

To begin with, some general considerations. Demand and supply for the stock of the commodity in question is the key consideration when trying to judge where prices are headed. The US currency is another moving part to bear in mind. We may be at peak strong dollar. Because many commodities are priced in dollars, any weakening in the worlds dominant reserve currency tends to raise commodity prices, most of which are priced in dollars.

- Golden returns in 2019, but is it too late to profit?

To make a call on what 2020 has in store for the oil price requires an assessment of the general direction of the global economy and how that impacts both industry and consumers as well as extraneous factors such as how the weather influences demand.

However, the latter is more a concern for traders as opposed to investors taking a longer view, so lets concentrate on the other factors regulating supply and demand.

Although the non-OPEC US is the worlds largest producer of crude, it is the cartel-like OPEC that potentially has greater sway over prices in its attempts to co-ordinate cuts in production or to opens the taps.

On that front it has not had much success in flow regulation. According to the Bloomberg Commodity Outlook published in November, prices are expected to continue to trade in a range between $50 and $60, with bulls pressuring prices lower at the upper range of that band where price resistance forms.

Although stock markets could be set to power higher going into 2020 following the calming of nerves around the US-China trade dispute and the return of political stability to the UK, that doesnt mean the global economy will deliver the sort of industrial production surge that could drive crude prices higher or those of other cyclical commodities such as copper, stuck in a downtrend since May 2018.

JPMorgan Asset Managements Year Ahead report thinks industrial metals will stay neutral given sub-trend global growth, citing Chinas property sector as a key demand driver but where the government is reluctant is ease current real estate restrictions.

The effects of backwardation, where the spot price is higher than the forward price, should also bear down on the oil price, further stunting any bullish rallies.

JPMorgan underlines the possibility that geopolitical tensions in the Middle East (Iran and Saudi Arabia, Syria) could result in episodic oil price surges in 2020, but concludes that softer demand growth and sufficient spare capacity globally should curb a sustained rise in oil prices.

US production of natural gas continues to expand, so dont expect any substantial price appreciation next year, regardless of the possibility of some improvement in global demand, especially from Asian emerging markets.

A key industrial input is copper and as such it is the commodity deemed most susceptible to the ebbs and flows of industrial activity.

Again, where the price goes is predicated on the direction of the global economy. Even though the trade war truce is bullish for copper and the US economy is still seeing healthy payroll growth, the situation in China remains far from encouraging, with GDP barely above the 6% required for the economy to maintain forward momentum assuming you hold store in the accuracy of the official data.

A quick word on agriculture. Prices have been trading sideways for key soft commodities that feed the world, such as wheat and corn. Cotton too hasnt done much but that could change with better news on the US-China trade war front if the truce turns into lasting peace.

The largest agriculture ETF, Invesco DB Agriculture (DBA), is down 7.3% year-to-date and -8.8% over five years, having suffered falling returns since 2011.

A better way of playing agriculture could be the VanEck Vectors/Agribusiness ETF (MOO). It invests in areas such as fertiliser, animal health, seeds, irrigation, farm equipment and machinery.

It is trading up 19% as the year draws to a close. It is well-diversified but nevertheless has substantial exposure to fertiliser producers, which could see it benefit from trade peace.

For 2020, we expect a full rebound in US acres planted and the recent recovery in palm oil prices to remain in place. Both factors should bode well for potash demand in 2020, says data provider Morningstar.

The bright spot for commodities continues to be in precious metals.

Although gold has come off the boil recently, currently trading at $1,513 (on 30 December)after hitting a six-year high at $1,560 in early September, its safe-haven properties will likely still be in demand in 2020. The yellow metals prospects are helped by a continuing low-yield environment and the ever-present possibility of a resurgence in unconventional monetary policy intervention by central bankers and the continuing geopolitical risks emanating from the Middle East, Hong Kong and the likes of North Korea, to name but three hotspots.

And although political risk has lessened dramatically in the UK with the large Conservative majority in parliament, the same cannot be said for the US, which enters the presidential election year with its head of state facing an impeachment trial in the Senate.

Swiss investment banking giant UBS in its Year Ahead 2020 report is backing gold over cyclical commodities, echoing the reasons stated above: Muted economic growth and now lower interest rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding gold, which does not offer a yield. Political uncertainty could send safe-haven flows into gold. And since gold is priced in USD, a weaker dollar would in turn push gold prices higher.

The palladium market brings to mind the old investment adage dont fight the trend. Since 2016, the price of the metal has been trending relentlessly higher, currently priced at $2,000 per troy ounce, making it more expensive than gold.

Two variables are at work here highly constrained supply and rising demand caused by the ongoing tightening of regulations to reduce emissions from carbon-burning vehicles.

Tai Wong, head of base and precious metals derivatives trading at BMO Capital Markets, emphasises the fact that the normal scenario for commodities, where rising prices leads to an increase in production that pressures prices lower, does not apply in this market. In most cases, the cure for high prices is high prices, but not for palladium, he explains.

There doesnt seem to be any new, ready supply at any reasonable price. So, it could continue to move higher from here, though perhaps with more volatility, adds Wong.

Palladium is used in catalytic converters and regulations on emissions are set to tighten further, with the replacement of carbon-burning vehicles by electric variants many years away.

WisdomTree Physical Palladium (PHPD) exchange traded product will cost investors 0.49% to hold and provides direct exposure to the metal, with HSBC bank the custodian of the palladium.

Our third commodity pick, Rare earths, are being used by China as a bargaining chip with the US in their trade dispute. China accounts for 80% of supply to the US and 70% of global production. The minerals are used to make key components in electronics for both civilian and military end users. There are 17 rare elements.

The US Army announced it plans to fund the processing of rare earths, an industry that was originally founded decades ago in the US.

The VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has been struggling this year but one way to leverage the US Army decision is by seeking those US companies lining up for a piece of the action.

There is arguably a new entrant in the commodities world that warrants a mention bitcoin.

Although touted as a digital currency, it is not used as such, or not very much. Instead, some see it either as a form of digital gold because of its supply being limited to 21 million (currently 18 million have been mined) or as a hedge against unconventional monetary policies.

Jan Van Eck, chairman and chief executive of ETF provider VanEck, leans towards viewing bitcoin as a hedge against central bankers. Its not exactly like gold [but] its a form of private money that will act as a hedge against central bank inflation, he said in a recent Financial Times interview.

The reward that miners receive for doing the bookkeeping on the bitcoin blockchain will be halved in May 2020, a mechanism that kicks in every four years. Miners currently receive 12.5 bitcoins for each block they verify. This is the way that new bitcoins come into circulation.

Constraining supply in this way should lead to price appreciation. However, bitcoin is dominated by speculation so there is no certainty here, to put it mildly.

Add to those technical considerations working in bitcoins favour is the expectation of further geopolitical uncertainty ahead and the continuing absence of a full-blown recovery in the global economy.

But that wont happen before the momentum from the stalled Facebook Libra crypto launch fully dissipates, with the price at the time of writing just above $7,000. Bitcoins Libra-induced high in 2019 was $13,700.

Read more from the original source:
2020 predictions for gold, bitcoin and other precious metals - Money Observer

Read More..

What Is a Cryptocurrency? We Need Clearer Definitions – Coindesk

This post is part of CoinDesk's 2019 Year in Review, a collection of 100 op-eds, interviews and takes on the state of blockchain and the world. Dr Gina C Pieters is an Assistant Instructional Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Chicago, and a Research Fellow at the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance at the University of Cambridge. She has been researching cryptocurrencies since 2015.

There is an unresolved debate over how to define decentralization in a distributed ledger system, even though decentralization of peer-to-peer payments was the motivating factor for bitcoin. Personally I like an approach that defines it as the absence of a named party participants must engage with. Think of it this way: Can someone in North Korea use it if they wanted to (that is, a permisson-less system, like bitcoin) and: Could China prevent me from using it? (a permissioned system, like Libra).

Libras Calibra wallet will only allow users who provide government ID to obtain Libra account numbers wallets, which appears to be how the project will satisfy AML/KYC requirements. The system plans to use a permissioned blockchain, and it is currently unclear which, if any, proof system it will use. Therefore, while Libra incorporates blockchain, it does not strictly require it as it is not fully decentralized: remove the blockchain and the project could find a way to continue substantially unaltered in its function. Despite this, the most descriptive, agreed-upon label we would apply is to call Libra a cryptocurrency on a permissioned blockchain.

This muddy language around cryptocurrency matters. In 2019 we began to see a serious investigation of cryptocurrencies from major, established, politically-connected entities instead of the pure marketing stunts from earlier years (compare the Libra project with Long Island Iced Tea). The regulatory hearings for Libra highlighted that the crypto-community urgently needs to provide linguistic guidance about whether we should allow projects that could fundamentally continue without decentralization to be referred to as a cryptocurrency. This moves further than the permissioned/permissionless blockchains distinction. It raises questions about the decentralization of proof, funding, and maintenance systems as well.

Linguistically, we need to distinguish between projects originating from centralized entities that use blockchain for either marketing or optimality, and projects that fundamentally require that any participant can avoid any named agent in the system. Without this distinction, 2019 showed us that projects like Libra and projects like bitcoin will be cast as comparable cryptocurrencies even though they are fundamentally different. In addition to projects like Libra, this matter is brought into focus by the potential rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC).

Central banks began to experiment with blockchain tech as early as 2015, leading to breathless accounts that they would soon begin issuing cryptocurrencies. These early experiments were not cryptocurrency projects at all: central banks were testing the use of blockchain (or DLT) as part of a potential upgrade to the legacy payment rails involved in wholesale banking (which moves large amounts of funds between a few, known parties). The most well-known project here is Bank of Canadas Project Jasper, though Hong Kong, Russia, South Africa, and Bank of England are also experimenting in this sphere. So far, these projects have either concluded that DLT technology is not a good fit, or they have significantly scaled back the use of DLT.

Ironically, a surveillance-focused CBDC could be the thing that defeats bitcoin as 'dissident tech'

But some central banks have now begun projects that may issue digital payment tokens. The earliest project, the Venezuelan Petro, is of questionable legitimacy given the fractured government support for it. The next generation includes more credible projects, including ones from the Bahamas (Project Sand Dollar), China (Digital Yuan), Sweden (e-krona), and Uruguay (e-Peso). Central bankers are uniform in referencing these projects as Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) and not as cryptocurrencies (or statecoins) for a very specific reason.

The Central Bank consensus is that decentralization is not a desirable property in a CBDC as it could aid tax avoidance and enable criminal payment systems. Therefore, while they recognize digital money may be an improvement over physical money, a central bank designed digital currency will not resemble a decentralized cryptocurrency. Planned CBDCs are not bitcoin-but-issued-by-the-government. They are more like credit-cards-but-issued-by-the-government, where your transactions can be tracked, examined and linked to your taxpayer-identity.

A CBDC project does not need to be decentralized to differentiate itself from current central bank policies in the manner that some desire. A monetary policy with negative interest rates would simply require disallowing all alternative money forms. Savings accounts at central banks do not require a digital payment token at all. A CBDC is not a requirement for a multinational currency (the Euro is a multinational currency, and the US dollar is accepted in transactions globally). If the intention is government surveillance coupling taxpayer ID with transactions, a decentralized CBDC that allows anyone to join without permission or barriers would never be installed. Ironically, a surveillance-focused CBDC could be the thing that defeats bitcoin as dissident tech, as it could make it impossible to buy-in or cash-out of the system undetected.

The main difference between Libra and bitcoin is that one is centralized while the other is not. The main difference between Libra and a CBDC is that one is a digital transaction token issued by a private company, while the other is issued by a government. There are powerful arguments on all sides as to which project type represents the best (or worst) type of digital money. What we need to realize going into 2020 is that those debates were not the debates legislators and regulators were having in 2019 when discussing Libra. To them, Libra and bitcoin are both cryptocurrencies because we have not provided more precise, differentiating language. At the moment, it appears that this lack of distinction will continue unabated in 2020, when various governments begin to test and perhaps even issue the next generation of CBDCs.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read the original post:
What Is a Cryptocurrency? We Need Clearer Definitions - Coindesk

Read More..

Chinas Dichotomy Between Cryptocurrency And Blockchain – Forbes

On Friday, December 27, 2019, Chinese regulators issued a joint regulatory warning on the rise of virtual currency trading activity in the country. The Beijing Local Financial Supervision Bureau, the People's Bank of China Business Management Department, the Beijing Banking and Insurance Regulatory Bureau, and the Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau noted that the uptick in activity is the result of the promotion of blockchain technology.

Indeed, on October 25, Chinese President Xi Jinping issued a statement for Chinese companies to seize the opportunity offered by blockchain technology. The markets reacted with a surge in the price of bitcoin and an increase in internet searches for the term blockchain on WeChat. The positivity on blockchain coming from Chinas leader is not new as he has in the past referred to blockchain as ten times the importance of the discovery of the Internet.

BEIJING, Nov. 7, 2019 -- Jing Xiandong, CEO of Ant Financial, introduces the blockchain platform of ... [+] Ant Financial during the fifth World Internet Conference in Wuzhen, east China's Zhejiang Province, Nov. 7, 2018. (Photo by Chen Yehua/Xinhua via Getty) (Xinhua/Chen Yehua via Getty Images)

The approach of being tough on virtual currency trading platforms while encouraging blockchain technology might seem at first to be complicated - particularly if public platforms such as Bitcoin or Ethereum are used that has a native token or cryptocurrency used as an essential part of the blockchain or distributed ledger technology. Of course, for China, with the imminent release of a Central Bank Digital Currency, and its wish to maintain control over the types of digital or cryptocurrencies traded similarly to the way it has controlled the spread and use of the Internet, a policy coming down hard on cryptocurrency trading platforms makes sense.

Many in the United States have noted the focus should not be on cryptocurrencies, but rather blockchain technology. Indeed, the cryptocurrency and blockchain community seems to swing like a pendulum. When Bitcoin goes up, its all about the cryptocurrency and the focus on blockchain gets blurred. When Bitcoin goes down, the industry and developers are quick to note that finally, there can be a focus on the real gem in all of this technology - a distributed ledger technology that will fundamentally change the way people, processes, and organizations operate.

Indeed, a recent Forbes article noted how Chinas approach to Blockchain was winning and notes the U.S. should pay attention. The U.S. has similarly started to pay attention, more as the result of Project Libra, that forced Congress to pay attention to both cryptocurrency and blockchain at the same time. While many Members of Congress became quickly adept at some of the finer distinctions in the marketplace, cryptocurrency and blockchain still seem to be words quickly conflated, where an increase in blockchain is the same as an increase in cryptocurrency, and so the U.S. runs a much higher risk than China in stopping cryptocurrency trading and also significantly impacting the development of blockchain technology in the country.

The notice from China harped on how the virtual currency trading platforms were creating the potential for investor harm in a variety of ways. As stated in the joint risk release, They launch zero-interest loans, dual currency financial management and other projects through digital currency mortgages. In other words, Decentralized Finance or DeFi, meet the Peoples Republic Of China.

And therein lies the issue for China - which is that there is very little interest in decentralization, and much more interest in seeing the development of blockchain technology and its central bank digital currency as a way of spreading its influence around the globe to push its own agenda.

Meanwhile, for the virtual currency trading platforms, The release, seriously warn institutions and personnel in Beijing that carry out related activities. They must not publicize and promote relevant virtual currency projects or platforms, they must not conduct virtual currency business sales or transactions, they must not engage in virtual currency transactions or disguised trading operations with investors, Acting on domestic and overseas virtual currency issuance and trading activities, financial institutions and non-bank payment institutions within its jurisdiction shall not provide services for any virtual currency transaction.

HONG KONG - 2019/04/06: In this photo illustration a cryptocurrency electronic cash Bitcoin logo is ... [+] seen on an Android mobile device with People's Republic of China flag in the background. (Photo Illustration by Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Thus, the seriousness of this warning makes it clear virtual currency trading is not welcome in China, and finishes by noting that investors should, maintain rationality ... beware of being deceived, and promptly report relevant clues about violations of laws and regulations. So, investors are then part of the regulatory structure as well in China, encouraged to provide tips to authorities if violations in the marketplace are noticed.

So, as China continues to pour money into the blockchain technology and prepares the release of its central bank digital currency, the country continues what was likely the inevitable, which is to push back on any other virtual currencies that might compete with its national currency.

The U.S. should take note, at a minimum, of the level of proficiency and understanding regulators in China have regarding cryptocurrency and blockchain, particularly in its ability to note how the promotion of blockchain technology can lead to cryptocurrency schemes as a result.

The rest is here:
Chinas Dichotomy Between Cryptocurrency And Blockchain - Forbes

Read More..

Ian Balina, The Controversial Face Of Cryptocurrency – Nasdaq

Ian Balina, a native of Uganda, Africa, is the founder and CEO ofToken Metrics, is Kiana Danials guest today on Invest Divas Diva on the Block.

Ian Balina someone who lost 2.5 million dollars while streaming live on youtube, is one of the most recognized and probably the most controversial personalities in the crypto community. He left behind his data analytics and IT jobs at companies like Deloitte and IBM to become a full-time crypto investor and researcher.

In this episode of Diva On The Block Ian and Kiana talk about:

His journey from Uganda, to the US Why he quit his secure job at IBM to work full time in crypto Why he focuses on ICOs and how he manages his risk His thoughts on transparency How he and his team are using AI, machine learning and data analytics to create investment strategies, and whether hes just using these words as a buzz word, or theyre actually using it I also chat with him about his upcoming project, Token Metrics, an investment, research, and media platform to take cryptocurrency investing mainstream.

After you watch the video,go to the comment sectionand let me know what you think of my discussion with Ian Balina and his new mission with Token Metrics.

Ian immigrated to the United States with his family at eight years old. He attended middle school and high school in the USA and would go on to attend The George Washington University (GWU) in Washington, D.C. on an academic merit scholarship. He would graduate GWU with a Bachelors and Masters in Computer Engineering.

Title:Influential Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Investor, Advisor, and Evangelist, and the Founder/CEO of Token MetricsWebsite:https://ianbalina.com/Linkedin:https://www.linkedin.com/in/ianbalina/Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/ianbalina/Twitter:https://twitter.com/DiaryofaMadeMan(138.5k followers)Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/diaryofamademan/

While at GWU, he got the entrepreneur bug and founded his first startup, Leximo, the worlds first social dictionary. After working on Leximo, he went on to work as an independent software developer, then as an IT consultant for Deloitte, the worlds largest consulting firm.

Ian later joined IBM as an Analytics Tech Evangelist, where he helped evangelize and sell the IBM Cloud and Big Data Analytics Portfolio in North America. Ian helped drive revenues in the millions of dollars per year. He was recognized as one of IBMs top employees by being a member of the IBM Hundred Percent Club, due to achieving more than 100% of his million-dollar sales quota. After four years with IBM, he retired from the corporate world to become a full-time cryptocurrency investor.

Ian Balina is also an influential Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Investor, Advisor, and Evangelist. He has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, CNBC, Huffington Post, The Street, INC and Entrepreneur Magazine for his work in analytics, cryptocurrencies, and entrepreneurship.

According to TheRichest.com, Mr. Balinas net worth is $6 million dollars

Ian started Diary of a Made Man, his video diary of his journal in life and in crypto investing. He became one of the worlds most prolific ICO influencers in 2017 while growing his portfolio from $37,000 to $5.36 million by January 2018. In April 2018, Ian Balina fell off his perch after sustaining a hack of his personal wallets in which he lost almost $2.5 million.

Ian is a founder and General Partner at 100X Advisors, a global blockchain investment and advisory firm,. The firm has made 15 investments in 15 different countries in the last year. He has brought a data-driven, money-ball approach to investing in blockchain startups, called Token Metrics.

Token Metrics is a data-driven cryptocurrency investment research platform that helps retail investors leverage analytics and machine learning to become better investors.

The BTC/USD pas remained below the dailyIchimoku cloud. It now appears to have bottomed out just above the key support level of $6,406.

The pair may even be in the process of forming aDouble Bottom bullish reversal chart pattern.

However, the bearish momentum still appears to be strong. A break below this key support level could open doors to further declines. Could Bitcoin reach the $4,000 again?

What do you think about Ian Balina and his controversial background? Do you think hes a scammer out there to get people? Or do you think he truly has the best interest of people in mind?

Go to thevideos comments sectionand let me know.

This article was originally published on InvestDiva.com.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Go here to read the rest:
Ian Balina, The Controversial Face Of Cryptocurrency - Nasdaq

Read More..

Cryptocurrency This Week: YouTube Removes Crypto Videos; Russia Bomb Threats Over A Bitcoin Fraud And More – Inc42 Media

Malls and courts in St Petersburg were evacuated over a wave of bomb threats related to a Bitcoin fraud

Bitcoin marks 100% growth this year

After Indians lost billions in Bitcoin-based MLM schemes, Kenyans lose KES 2.7 Bn ($27 Mn) In NuruCoin scam

As 2019 comes to an end, when compared to 2018, the year has been better for cryptocurrencies especially Bitcoin in multiple ways despite multiple scams through the year and cases of fraud involving cryptocurrency. Bitcoin started the year at around $3.6K and went on attain, if not the all-time $19.5K, $14K on July 10, this year.

At the time of writing the cryptocurrency is trading at $7.3K, and if the price remains so, Bitcoin will exit the year, marking over 100% growth, this year.

10 years and on, while the dark knight of the dark web, remains the undisputed king among all the cryptocurrencies, stable coins, according to many, may beat Bitcoin in the near future.

Can Facebooks Libra whose unveiling created a lot of buzz this year be that stable coin? Facebooks Libra is slated for July 15 release. However, for Libra to rise to the challenge, first needs to get approval from regulatory authorities across the world which looking at the current scenario may not be easier as Facebooks founder Mark Zuckerberg might have thought.

Barring Libra which will be controlled by Libra Association, cryptocurrencies, based on public blockchains, have been known for their democratic approach. However, we are also aware of how big whales and Ripple developers have influenced various cryptocurrencies and Ripple tokens in the past.

According to a Chinese research report, about 45,000 BTC ($302 Mn) and 800,000 ETH ($102 Mn) were sent by steering pockets of PlusToken to individual addresses that are owned by the frauds themselves. And as a result, 20,000 BTC which is worth over $134 Mn is about to be disposed of. Freezing such large amount of cryptocurrencies that were obtained inappropriately is capable of bringing down the costs of cryptocurrency, said the report.

Last week, Ripple raised Series C funding worth $200 Mn. While the company will use this fund to improve its global payments and to broaden the utility of the digital asset XRP and the XRP Ledger, Tone Vays, a former Wall Street trader and VP of JP Morgan Chase has a starkly different view. In an interview, Vays stated, I think XRP should be in very serious trouble. I want to understand why Ripple is doing a fundraise the Ripple token now more or less act as a security of the Ripple corporation. And I think the people who created it should be held accountable. Everything about Ripple token is bad.

I usually dont like people getting arrested, but if the senior management of Ripple gets arrested Ill actually be happy. Vays

On December 24, VC Chris Dunn who has 210K subscribers on Youtube complained on Twitter that most of his videos pertaining to cryptocurrencies have been taken down by Youtube. He tweeted,

YouTube just removed most of my crypto videos citing harmful or dangerous content and sale of regulated goods,' Dunn wrote, adding hes been making videos on the platform for 10 years and built up 200,000 subs and 7 million views.

Soon it appeared that not only Dunn but a large number of other YouTubers were also affected by the takedowns. Cryptopotate has compiled the list of affected Youtubers.

Responding to the criticism, a Youtube spokesperson stated that the videos were taken down by mistake. The spokesperson said,

With the massive volume of videos on our site, sometimes we make the wrong call. When its brought to our attention that a video has been removed mistakenly, we act quickly to reinstate it. We also offer uploaders the ability to appeal removals and we will re-review the content.

Dunn, in another tweet, has now confirmed that all his videos have been reinstated.

NuruCoin, a Kenyan cryptocurrency which became quite popular in 2018 through its multi-level-marketing has suddenly shut its shop after raising KES 2.7 Bn ($27 Mn) from investors.

According to reports, approximately 11K investors had participated in NuruCoin initial coin offering which was organised by ChurchBlaze. All the ChurchBlaze offices across the above towns have been closed including their main office in a Nairobi suburb, according to reports.

Blockchain Association Kenya along with other organisations has now released a joint statement in order to raise awareness about cryptocurrencies and its differences from Ponzi schemes.

Earlier this week, schools, courts and malls in Russias largest city St Petersburg were evacuated over bomb threats emails screenshots circulated in Russian News Media. Sent from anonymous addresses, senders claimed to had planted bombs across various places and demanded $870K worth of Bitcoin, supposedly stolen from the defunct cryptocurrency exchange WEX, reported Coindesk.

Its not the first time such emails were circulated, in fact since November, there has been a wave of similar email threats with senders accusing Russian businessman Konstantin Malofeyev of Bitcoin fraud. Malofeyev is reportedly under international sanctions over the Ukraine conflict. According to allegations, Malofeyev had stolen $120 Bitcoins from WEX, a now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange.

Message from our partner

More:
Cryptocurrency This Week: YouTube Removes Crypto Videos; Russia Bomb Threats Over A Bitcoin Fraud And More - Inc42 Media

Read More..

How To Really Help Free North Koreans Through Crypto – Forbes

A few weeks ago, the FBI arrested an Alabama-born computer programmer for allegedly helping the North Korean regime evade U.S. sanctions through blockchain technology. According to the indictment, Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith provided technical education at an April 2019 blockchain conference in Pyongyang run by the regime. He also reportedly conspired to send cryptocurrency between North Korea and South Korea and encouraged other Americans to attend another Pyongyang blockchain conference scheduled for 2020.

Many prominent voices in the crypto space condemn Griffiths actions, but there has been sympathy in some corners from those who echo Griffiths line of thinking: He argued that spreading knowledge about blockchain and crypto could help bring peace to the Korean peninsula.

Such thinking is illogical. And it is blind to the nature of the Kim Jong Un regime, the actual nuclear threat, and the high stakes involved in the conflict. North Korea is the worlds most controlled society. Giving its ruling elites new capabilities to circumvent sanctions only helps them better enrich themselves. It increases their stranglehold on power and makes the regime more recalcitrant toward diplomatic engagement. The North Korean people have continued to suffer for decades precisely because sophisticated sanctions evasion schemes help the regime fill its coffers and, thus, maintain the status quo.

If blockchain enthusiasts want financial technology to help liberate those living under oppressive governments, there is a much better way: Assist those who are actually working to uplift and empower those who are truly oppressed. There are many organizations that provide humanitarian aid to the everyday North Korean suffering under the regime.

Cryptocurrencies could play a role in supporting such efforts. And it may not require more than simple collaboration between interested parties in both the crypto space and the NGO community. They should work together to create a campaign for cryptocurrency charitable giving that supports non-profit organizations that rescue North Korean refugees. And it could be done in a way that regulators approve.

International charitable giving is a multi-billion dollar industry, but most of those donations flow into opaque infrastructures where donors are blind to the real-time funding streams of the organizations they support. Blockchain technologys defining features are the transparency of its ledger and the ability to more efficiently transfer value across borders. Donations via cryptocurrencyif orchestrated via credible exchanges and NGOscould bring transparency to donations and widen the pool of givers to many causes.

The following is how such a campaign could work, using the example of a hypothetical donor concerned about helping the North Korean people:

A donor would visit a cryptocurrency exchange website that has partnered with an international charity, such as Liberty in North Korea, which helps North Koreans escape the country to nations that provide asylum (Note: China is no safe haven because authorities there send escapees back to North Korea, where they often are punished severely). Any participating charity that aides North Korean escapees will need to make sure it strictly observes all sanctions guidelines. And the exchange should be a well-established business that has transparent ownership and maintains the highest standards in anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance.

In this campaign, once the user opens up an account at the exchange, he or she would then be given access to provide cryptocurrency funds to a specific Rescue North Koreans wallet. That wallet would belong to the charity. The donations could be set up as one-time or recurring. The wallet address would be visible on the blockchain, so the donor could see the balance of funds and the wallets ongoing activity.

This would be the backbone of a cryptocurrency charity campaign arrangement between exchanges, NGOs, and donors. But additional services could be built upon it. Developers could add third-party applications that offer deeper analysis of the transaction flows for participating charities. And charities could set up wallets for different operations and show when wallet funds are cashed out into regular currency. The cash out wallets should be specified and verifiable on the blockchain.

Of course these measures would not shine much light on how charities use their funds after cashing out, but the real-time insight gained into donations would provide much more accountability than current funding systems. At the same time, all this data transparency should not risk donor privacy. As with most custodial wallets at exchanges, a users originating wallet should be held within the internal wallet structure of the exchange so public blockchain analysis could not unmask individual donors.

The cypher-punks of crypto may not be interested in such a proposal. It lacks the danger and intrigue of venturing to Pyongyang in defiance of the U.S. State Department. It would be a practical use-case, taking advantage of the technology as it is available already to millions of people. It could bring new donors to legitimate organizations reaching the isolated and vulnerable.

A well-regulated cryptocurrency crowdfunding campaign would actually support long-standing U.S. foreign policy goals of pressuring the Kim regime and helping those who flee it. Also, the visibility into funding flows would assist tax authorities and other financial regulators in better understanding the financial landscape of tax-exempt organizations. In conventional finance, authorities rely mostly on self-reporting by nonprofits and financial institutions. Cryptocurrency donations would help regulators, trust, but verify.

Some cryptocurrency enthusiasts actually argue that crypto is most valuable for breaking laws and social constructs. It seems they have a point when much initial adoption involves illicit use. But early crypto use and its image have been shaped more by opportunism than any intrinsic nature of the technology. And the worldview of blockchain programmers like Griffith has driven the opportunities they have sought. Perhaps they have not found practical ways to help the world because they have not been involved in solving the worlds non-technological problems.

Opportunistic illicit use of cryptocurrency is not going away. So those in the crypto space who want to build legitimacy should spend more time away from the virtual space to see how the real world is working. Many people who are trying to bring freedom, economic empowerment, and good governance to those who need it could use their help.

More:
How To Really Help Free North Koreans Through Crypto - Forbes

Read More..

Are you ready to rock? City of St. Cloud hosting annual New Year’s Eve event – Osceola News-Gazette

The annual Rockin the Cloud New Years Eve celebration will once again be held in downtown St. Cloud.

The New Years Eve extravaganza culminating with the ball drop in Times Square to signal the start of a new year entices many to crowd the streets of New York to witness the spectacle every Dec. 31.

Many more find the comfort of home without the crowds and traffic more enticing so they watch the annual event on TV. Osceola County residents may find themselves similarly situated.

There are many entertainment options from which to choose in the Central Florida area to welcome the new year, but the thought of navigating the accompanying crowds and notorious traffic, makes ones couch seem ever more appealing to all but the most diehard celebrants. There is another option.

The city of St. Cloud, along with OUC The Reliable One, and Experience Kissimmee, is hosting a local version of this time-honored New Years Eve tradition.

Complete with live music, fireworks, and a cloud drop, the fourth annual Rockin the Cloud New Years Eve celebration in downtown St. Cloud provides an evening of fun and entertainment, but without the crowds and traffic of the big city. And, thanks to the support of these and other local sponsors, including Shamrock Auto Body and Dukes Brewhouse, the event is free to the public.

Erin Jenks, the St. Cloud Parks and Recreation Special Events manager, said that fans of the event appreciate that it is held locally requiring little travel time. She added that the area is spacious and has easily accommodated some 6,000 attendees in previous years.

There is a lot of room for people to go to and from (the event) and not feel crowded, she said.

Specifically, Rockin the Cloud will be held in downtown St. Cloud on Pennsylvania Avenue and New York Avenue between 10th Street and 12th Street. Free parking will be available at City Hall (1300 9th St.) and Centennial Park (1214 10th St.).

Live musical entertainment will be presented on three stages. Opening the evenings entertainment on the main stage located at the corner of New York Avenue and 11th Street is the acoustic duo, Dom and Skart, from the band, The Supervillains (both are from St. Cloud). They will be followed by Maiden Voyage. The other stages feature The Scott Baker Band, The Alex Hayes Band and Harlequin.

Headlining the event is country singer, Brooke Eden. Jenks said that the Florida-born singer has opened for Garth Brooks and has performed at Nashvilles famed Grand Ole Opry.

She will be the final performer before the midnight festivities and will take the stage for an encore performance afterward.

One of the things that we really want to focus on is utilizing our downtown businesses. We want to support our local businesses in this area with this event, said Jenks.

To that end, all the events food and drink will be offered by St. Clouds downtown bars and eateries. Participating establishments include Brews N Blues, Garage Bar, Thee Dog House, Chimentos Spaghetti House, Cobblestone Courtyard, and The American Legion, Post 80.

Rockin the Cloud is a family-friendly event, which will be supervised by law enforcement and private security personnel to promote a fun and safe holiday celebration experience for all.

See the article here:
Are you ready to rock? City of St. Cloud hosting annual New Year's Eve event - Osceola News-Gazette

Read More..

The year of the French unicorns – TechCrunch

There are now 11 French unicorns, and many of them arrived in 2019

In September 2019, President Emmanuel Macron was about to wrap up a speech on late-stage investment in France. According to a press briefing and some discussions with a source, everything that he was supposed to announce had been announced.

But he dropped an unexpected number. Ill leave you with a goal: there should be 25 French unicorns by 2025, Macron said. A unicorn is a private company with a valuation of $1 billion or more.

When you mention France in a conversation with foreigners, they dont immediately think about startups. In December 2018, I covered a two-day roadshow of the French tech ecosystem with 40 partners of international venture capital firms, as well as limited partners, from Andreessen Horowitz to Greylock Partners, Khosla Ventures and more.

The same clichs came up again and again taxes, labor law, long lunches You name them. But it doesnt matter if those clichs are true or not (hint: They arent), the French tech ecosystem has been thriving. And 2019 has been a remarkable year when it comes to reaching unicorn status and raising late-stage rounds of funding.

According to a recent report from VC firm Atomico, there are 11 unicorns in France. Some of them have been around for years, such as BlaBlaCar (a ride-sharing marketplace for long distance rides), OVHcloud (a cloud hosting company), Deezer (a music streaming service) and Veepee (an e-commerce company formerly known as Vente-privee.com).

But in 2019 alone, a handful of companies have reached unicorn status. Here are a few examples.

See the original post here:
The year of the French unicorns - TechCrunch

Read More..

The biggest government tech stories of 2019 part one – PublicTechnology

Its been a bit of a quiet year, eh?

In these times of stability and certitude, it can be difficult for journalists to find things to write about particularly those of us who concern ourselves with what the government is up to.

But, even against a backdrop of general uneventfulness, PublicTechnology has endeavoured to bring you news and analysis on the digital and data implications of the few things of note to happen this year in Whitehall, Westminster, the NHS, local government, and law enforcement.

We can only thank our readers for sticking with us through such soporific times.

And, over the course of 2019, there were a few things that got you clicking; we have been through the stats and come up with the 10 biggest stories of the year.

In this first part of our annual round-up, we go through numbers 10 to six. Look out tomorrow for the rundown of the five biggest stories.

10. Full fibreThe discussion around full-fibre broadband progressed significantly in 2019. By eight years, to be precise.

In May 2018 then chancellor Philip Hammond set out the governments vision that fibre-to-the-premises network would reach an additional two UK million buildings each year for the next decade and half, resulting in comprehensive coverage by 2033.

Fast forward 18 months and the Conservatives general election manifesto was promising that ubiquitous connectivity will now be achieved by 2025. To achieve this, networks will have to be rolled out at about double the speed envisioned by Hammond.

But this Tory pledge was only the second most eye-catching broadband-based policy unveiled during the election period; Labour rather stole a march on the government with its own proposal to renationalise part of BT and deliver free full-fibre connectivity to everyone in the country.

All the while, numerous towns, cities and regions have pressed ahead with their own initiatives to deliver local FTTP networks. Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds, Wolverhampton, and Durham all floated contracts this year seeking delivery partners, while there was also government-backed investment in the Scottish Highlands and Islands.

However, parliamentary questions in July revealed that a 400m government fund created to support investments in companies delivering full-fibre networks has, since its summer 2017 launch,largely sat unused.

But, with a promise to scale up investment via the fund in 2020 and beyond, full fibre seems likely to remain a big story for a number of years yet.

9. General practice transformationAs the country slid towards an increasingly inevitable election, the front line of the NHS was on the front line of the political battle throughout the year.

This brought with it a sharp focus on the sufficiency and efficacy of the health services resources, with technology and IT systems a key part of that discussion.

Developments in 2019 will bring significant change to how tech is used by the healthcare professionals whom most of us see far more frequently than any other: our community GPs.

Across the course of the year, the Department of Health and Social Care worked to bring to fruition the new 500m GP IT Futures framework.

Health secretary Matt Hancock has claimed that the deal will break the current duopoly of EMIS Health and TPP SystmOne, which currently account for the vast majority of the GP IT market.

A total of 69 firms won a spot on the framework, which now features seven providers of core record systems.

New technology is sorely needed across the world of general practice, according to the Royal College of General Practitioners which, earlier this year, warned Hancock that, without investment in basic IT infrastructure that is fit for purpose, his envisioned technology revolution will never come to pass.

Particularly as many surgeries still need to undertake multimillion-pound projects to digitise paper Lloyd George records which, in some cases, are 70 years old.

8. The end of GSIAny technology that, if it were a person, would long since have been able to vote and get married, is probably overdue for an upgrade.

But breaking up can be hard to do especially after more than two decades together. In 2019 the civil service faced the heart-wrenching task of finally wavinggoodbye to the Government Secure Intranet, commonly known as GSi.

The technology was first launched in 1997 as a means of allowing government organisations to securely communicate and share data.

In 2010 the government announced that it wanted to start moving towards new technology and that GSi email domains would be supported for no longer than five years.

After a rather long five years, the deadline for migrating away from GSi came and went this year. The 31 March cut-off was announced 18 months beforehand but, still, two months before the deadline, almost one in four departments had yet to complete the process.

This included two of the biggest departments by headcount: the Department for Work and Pensions; and HM Revenue and Customs.

Between them, the two departments employ more than 150,000 people. All of whom along with the rest of Whitehall should have needed to update their email signature in 2019.

7. All change at the top of GDSThe most prominent public sector technology agency, the Government Digital Service, ends 2019 with completely new political and executive leaders than those with which it began the year.

After three years as director general, it was announced in June that Kevin Cunnington was to leave GDS to take up a newly created Cabinet Office-based post as the UKs digital envoy. In his new role, he is tasked with promoting the work of UK government services, including the digital sector, across the world.

He has been replaced as leader of GDS by Alison Pritchard, who formerly headed up the organisations Brexit work. Pritchard officially holds the post on an interim basis, so more change at the top could be forthcoming in the new year.

Whoever is in charge of GDS, their role will be supplemented by a new arrival: the government chief digital and information officer. The permanent secretary-level post has been created to provide a new figurehead for IT and digital across the civil service. The job was advertised in September and the successful candidate will ultimately serve as the head of governments 17,000-strong digital, data and technology profession a responsibility that currently sits with the leader of GDS.

In 2019 GDS also saw ministerial, as well as management change. Oliver Dowdens 18-month spell as the Westminster representative of GDS came to an end in July when he was promoted to become Cabinet Office minister.

His replacement as minister for implementation, Simon Hart, lasted only four months before he was appointed Welsh secretary shortly after the election. The GDS brief now looks set to be taken on by Jeremy Quin, who has joined the Cabinet Office as a junior minister.

6. Procurement shake-upPublicTechnology broke the news earlier this year that responsibility for running the Digital Marketplace the primary vehicle for government to shop for and buy cloud and development services has been shifted from GDS to its sister agency, the Crown Commercial Service.

The procurement agency also revealed that it is working to build a so-called Digital Marketplace 2, an all-new procurement platform that will supersede the existing system.

For the last few years, CCS had been working on the development of the Crown Marketplace, which was envisioned as an Amazonesque online catalogue through which the public sector could buy a comprehensive range of goods and services. This project has now been ditched, in favour of something which will bear more resemblance to a comparison website.

To go with the new marketplace which is due to launch within the next 18 months CCS will also look to shake up the current landscape of tech and digital frameworks.

Alongside the broad scope of G-Cloud, the agency also wishes to introduce aframework specialised in the area of cloud hosting, as well as one geared to artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics.

Original post:
The biggest government tech stories of 2019 part one - PublicTechnology

Read More..

Startup Events This Week: Pulse42 and Mixer By Inc42, Drone Festival – Inc42 Media

Global Nagpur Summit was hosted on Dec 22Inc42 will be hosting Pulse42 and Mixer in JanuaryIndian govt is hosting Drone Festival of India this week

Last week, the Global Nagpur Summit was hosted by Nagpur First at Chitnavis Centre on December 22. The events focused on four sections of Nagpurs startup ecosystem women entrepreneurs, social startups, tech startups and taking the startups to an international forum.

The event hosted some eminent speakers like Tang Guocai, Consulate General of the Peoples Republic of China in Mumbai; Anand Sancheti, managing director of SMS Limited; Jalen He, chief architect of Kavout Corporation and Dr Alex Li, Alibaba Cloud GM, Alibaba Cloud South Asia.

Nagpur First, which was founded in 2006, is a group of stakeholders that want to be a catalyst towards making Nagpur a global city by 2020.

As we step into a new week, heres a list of upcoming events:

Mixer is Inc42s signature #NoAgenda event, which allows important minds of the Indian startup ecosystem to come together and network. With the Mixer, Inc42 aims to bring together enablers and contributors to the Indian startup ecosystem, hoping for interesting collaborations and innovations in the future. Mixer is a relaxed evening to know each other better and catch up on whats happening around them.

No appointments needed, Mixer by Inc42 is a platform that allows entrepreneurs, investors and founders to catch up with each other over great food and cocktails. The event is supported by annual partnersNetApp, AWS, Paytm, Times Internet and HSBCthe event will be held on January 9.

Who Should Attend: Startup founders, entrepreneurs, investors, workDate: January 9, 2020Venue: Delhi

Begin the new year with Inc42e signature tech party Pulse42. This relaxing evening will connect the investor community and startups in an informal setting. Pulse42 is all about getting conversations going among stakeholders with a no-agenda approach. For 2020, Pulse42 is bringing The Pulse of Tech outside monotonous meeting rooms in Indias startup capital, Bengaluru. The event is supported by annual partnersTimes Internet, AWS, Paytm, HSBC and NetApp Excellerator, the party to bid adieu to the decade-gone-by is on January 23, 2020, at The Bier Library, Koramangala, Bengaluru.

Until last year, Pulse42 had been a closed-door event for the attendees, but with the ever-growing community and after doing 10 editions of Pulse42 and engaging over 1000 founders, investors and ecosystem enablers, it was time to give more people a chance to experience the same.

Who Should Attend: Investors, Startup foundersDate: January 23, 2020Venue: The Bier Library, Koramangala, Bengaluru

Indian governments flagship Startup India, in collaboration with the Ministry of Civil Aviation, is hosting the Drone Festival on January 6 and 7, 2020. The event will have keynotes and panel discussions dedicated to the drone policies of the world, the advancement of drone technology, operations, and traffic management in the drone ecosystem. Moreover, the event will also hold a session on the future of the drone industry.

The Drone Festival of India invites aviation regulators, drone manufacturers, drone service companies, drone software companies, flying training organisations and enthusiasts and consumers from both government and private enterprises.

Who Should Attend: Startups, drone manufacturers, drone service and software companies, Investors, Tech Enthusiasts, and other stakeholdersDate: January 6 and 7, 2020Venue: Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi

Message from our partner

Read more from the original source:
Startup Events This Week: Pulse42 and Mixer By Inc42, Drone Festival - Inc42 Media

Read More..