Page 398«..1020..397398399400..410420..»

Backlash against identifying Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto grows on social media – CryptoSlate

As new information emerges that could potentially identify the creator of Bitcoin, speculation on the matter is being met with backlash on social media.

Jack Mallers, founder and CEO of Bitcoin payment app Strike, said:

You guys gotta stop speculating on who Satoshi [Nakamoto] is its so fiat its childish you sound like a bunch of frat brothers trying to social climb up the curve.

Mallers commented on speculation that Hal Finney an early Bitcoin contributor who passed away in 2014 may be Nakamoto. He suggested that such speculation could be dangerous to Hals widow, Fran Finney. Furthermore, Mallers said that Nakamoto clearly intended to remain anonymous by using a pseudonym and said that speculation disrespects this.

Bitcoin Core contributor Matt Corallo contributor made similar comments earlier, writing:

This [speculation] is absolutely disgusting. Hals bitcoin were sold long, long ago to help pay for ALS treatments. Treasure hunters have since harassed Fran seeking some billions in bitcoin that she doesnt have. Alleging [someone] is satoshi is incredibly dangerous. Dont do it.

Los Angeles-based Bitcoiner and software engineer GangGangHODL, meanwhile, wrote that Nakamoto created Bitcoin as ultimate gift to humanity and only wanted anonymity in return. Lets give that gift back with all due respect, they wrote.

Finney and several other early Bitcoin contributors have long been considered likely candidates for the individual (or individuals) working as Satoshi Nakamoto. Finney is specifically considered a likely candidate because of his early use of Bitcoin, a comparative analysis of his writing style, and the fact that he once lived in the same neighborhood as someone named Dorian Nakamoto.

More recent speculation has seemingly been prompted by a court case involving computer scientist Craig Wright, who claims to be Nakamoto. A coalition of crypto industry members called the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) is fighting Wrights dubious claim in court.

Several early contributors, including Adam Back and Martii Malmi, have recently submitted their early email correspondence with Nakamoto to the case. The current controversy comes from speculation in which Adam Cochran, a partner at Cinneamhain Ventures (CEHV), speculated that Hal Finney is likely to be the individual working behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto by examining those emails and outlining a timeline of events.

Despite these recent developments, Satoshi Nakamotos true identity is ultimately unknown, and there is no widespread consensus about who he or she may be.

See the original post here:

Backlash against identifying Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto grows on social media - CryptoSlate

Read More..

Bitcoin Royalty Descends on the Satoshi Nakamoto Trial – WIRED

Bitcoin was invented by Satoshi Nakamoto, an enigmatic figure about whom almost nothing is known. Fifteen years ago, Satoshi brought the idea of an electronic cash system into being with the help of a small cast of oddballs. This week, some of those early collaboratorsnow crypto-celebrities in their own righttook to the witness box of a London courtroom. They had come to testify against an alleged imposter.

Since 2016, Australian computer scientist Craig Wright has claimed to be Satoshi. The claim is widely disputed, yet Wright has wielded it in a series of lawsuits against developers and others in pursuit of establishing intellectual property rights over Bitcoin. The stakes are high: If Wright succeeds, he could prevent developers from working on the Bitcoin codebase and dictate the terms of use for the system.

Earlier this month, a trial began in the UK High Court, the purpose of which is to challenge Wrights claim to being the creator of Bitcoin. The case was filed by a consortium of crypto firms called the Crypto Open Patent Alliance, which is asking the court to declare that Wright is not Satoshi, thereby limiting his ability to found further litigation on the claim. COPA claims that Wright has fabricated his evidence and repeatedly changed his story as new inconsistencies come to light. It called on the early bitcoiners to help prove it.

Among those who testified were Adam Back, Mike Hearn, Martti Malmi, and Zooko Wilcox-OHearn, each of whom contributed to the early development of Bitcoin in their own way. With the exception of Hearn, who had a polished manner and dressed sharply, the witnesses had the air of technologists: softly spoken and somewhat awkward, but quietly authoritative. Earlier in the trial, Wright had faced a grueling seven-day cross-examination, in which he rejected hundreds of claims of forgery and misrepresentation. The evidence supplied by the bitcoiners, COPA hoped, would help dismantle his story.

In 2008, when Satoshi was finalizing the design of the Bitcoin system, they pitched the concept to a niche online community of cryptographers. Discussions about Bitcoin spilled into fringes of the web occupied by anarchists and libertarians, who relished the idea of a monetary system divorced from the state.

From these two realms, a misfit band of supporters came together to assist Satoshi. They shared a belief, as Back described it in court, in technology as a tool for positive change. Some volunteered their advice, others their code, and others their labor. After Satoshi disappeared, in 2011, they carried Bitcoin forward.

The figures called upon by COPA to testify each made a distinct mark on Bitcoin. Back created a precursor technology called Hashcash (although Wright disputes its relevance) and corresponded with Satoshi as the Bitcoin creator drafted the white paper. Satoshi tasked Malmi with curating Bitcoin.org, which hosted educational materials. Hearn was one of the earliest contributors to the Bitcoin codebase. And Wilcox-OHearn was among the first to blog about Bitcoin, spreading the gospel. As Bitcoin grew, these early collaborators became themselves revered in crypto circles for their place in Bitcoin lore.

Read this article:

Bitcoin Royalty Descends on the Satoshi Nakamoto Trial - WIRED

Read More..

Satoshi warned against labeling bitcoin as an ‘investment’ – Blockworks

New emails from pseudonymous bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto were made public on Friday.

The new emails, released by Martii Malmi, not only add to known bitcoin lore, but give readers more insight into the humble beginnings of bitcoin and how Satoshi worked to launch the network.

He also revealed some personality behind the creator. For example, in November 2009, Satoshi told Malmi, this is going to be fun!

At one point, Satoshi even used the word darn and referred to Bitcointalk forum member Xunie as a goofball. In late November 2009, after Malmi auto generated a logo on CoolText.com, Satoshi shot it down as being too Disco/web-1990s.

Some of the communications stand out especially in todays environment such as the fact that Satoshi didnt want to label bitcoin as an investment.

Read more: 13 years ago, Bitcoins pseudonymous creator signed off

Im uncomfortable with explicitly saying consider it an investment, Satoshi said in June 2009. Thats a dangerous thing to say and you should delete that bullet point. Its okay if they come to that conclusion on their own, but we cant pitch it as that.

In that same email, Satoshi floated the idea of calling bitcoin a cryptocurrency.

Someone came up with the word cryptocurrencymaybe its a word we should use when describing Bitcoin, do you like it? he asked.

In 2010, Satoshi expressed concern about pushing the anonymity angle of bitcoin, arguing that users could expose transaction history information, which could therefore expose identities.

Read more: Bitcoins genesis block of transaction was created 15 years ago

Its possible to be pseudonymous, but you have to be careful, he wrote. If people were to believe that it was anonymous, then the backlash will be much worse if we havent prepared expectations by warning in advance that you have to take precautions if you really want to make [being anonymous] work.

Satoshi added that anonymous also sounds a bit shady.

Then, based on the correspondence between Malmi and Satoshi, it looks like Satoshi took a break for a couple of months in 2010. Malmi restarts the email chain commenting that he hadnt seen Satoshi in a while.

Read more: Would the US arrest Satoshi Nakamoto if they returned today?

In previous emails, Satoshi referenced a full-time job outside of bitcoin. In July 2009, Satoshi told Malmi that he wasnt going to be much help right now because he was pretty busy with work and needed a break after 18 months.

There may also be reason to assume that Satoshi didnt put his coding skills to work at his full-time job. In an October email, he said, Its good to be coding again!

Satoshi tells Malmi in 2010 that hes once again been busy with other things and will be back to bitcoin shortly.

Dont miss the next big story join ourfree daily newsletter.

Read the original:

Satoshi warned against labeling bitcoin as an 'investment' - Blockworks

Read More..

Could Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto become richer than Elon Musk? – CryptoSlate

Bitcoins pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, is currently the 26th richest human being on the planet based on the amount of BTC he is presumed to have owned.

Nakamoto famously holds a little over $1 million Bitcoin in a wallet that has been dormant for more than a decade, which is also the primary reason many believe he may have died.

Based on Bitcoins $54,000 price, his holdings are worth roughly $50 billion as of Feb. 26.

Meanwhile, some estimates suggest that Nakamoto holds 1.1 million BTC, which would push him closer to $60 billion.

The surge in Bitcoins price to near-all-time highs has caused some to speculate whether the richest person in the world could be an anonymous, unknown person.

For Nakamoto to overtake the likes of Bernard Arnault and Elon Musk, Bitcoin would have to increase nearly 4x from its current price of $55,000 or 3x from its previous all-time high of $69,000.

Preston Pysh, co-founder of TIP, observed the possibility in an X post, writing:

Itll be interesting if the wealthiest person in the world is unknown [ie. Satoshi Nakamoto]. At about $212k per Bitcoin, it happens.

At a price of $212,000, Nakamotos Bitcoin holdings would be worth $233.2 billion, allowing him to overtake Bernard Arnault and his familys net worth of $229.1 billion.

Further calculations show that BTC hitting $208,300 would be sufficient for Nakamoto to overtake the top spot on the list by a narrower margin. Meanwhile, Bitcoin would need to be worth $189,700 for Nakamoto to become richer than Musk in second place.

Meanwhile, Amazon founder and executive chairman Jeff Bezos third place would be usurped at $178,000, while Mark Zuckerbergs fourth place spot and Bill Gates seventh would be overtaken once BTC hits $154,200 and $115,900, respectively.

Read more:

Could Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto become richer than Elon Musk? - CryptoSlate

Read More..

Bitcoin explodes: Nakamoto in the closed circle of the 25 richest – Cointribune EN

Mon 26 Feb 2024 4 min of reading by Evans S.

In 2024, the creator of Bitcoin, known by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, joined the very exclusive circle of the 25 richest people on the planet. This historic event does not simply redefine the boundaries of wealth. Indeed, it also highlights the meteoric rise of Bitcoin, a once-fringe cryptocurrency, now at the heart of the global economy.

The year 2024 marked a decisive turning point for Bitcoin, whose market capitalization crossed the impressive threshold of 1 trillion dollars. This unprecedented feat now ranks the cryptocurrency among the worlds top ten assets, proving its integration and growing acceptance in the global financial system.

The spectacular valuation of Bitcoin not only reflects renewed investor confidence but also recognition of its disruptive potential.

Satoshi Nakamotos growing fortune, estimated at 51 billion dollars, is directly linked to this surge in Bitcoins value.

Owning between 1 and 1.1 million BTC, Nakamoto has seen his wealth increase by nearly 9 billion dollars in just two months.

This exponential growth places the enigmatic inventor just behind iconic figures in industry and technology, redefining traditional notions of wealth and power.

Unlike traditional billionaires, Nakamotos fortune is scattered across thousands of wallets, theoretically offering unprecedented financial liquidity and flexibility.

This unique structure makes him one of the most liquid individuals on paper, even surpassing the financial mobilization capabilities of some of the biggest names on the Forbes list.

However, this potential liquidity comes with its share of speculations and uncertainties, particularly concerning the impact that such mobilization of funds could have on the Bitcoin market itself.

Beyond wealth, the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains one of the 21st centurys greatest mysteries. The question of whether Nakamoto is a person, a group of people, or even still alive, fuels speculation and theories.

Even more intriguing is the fact that not a single one of the accumulated bitcoins has ever been spent, raising doubts about the intentions and motivations behind the creation of this revolutionary currency.

The entry of Satoshi Nakamoto into the top 25 richest people in the world is not just a sensational news story; it represents a turning point in global economic history.

Bitcoin, with its promises of decentralization and financial freedom, continues to challenge established paradigms. As for Nakamoto, the figure behind this upheaval, his legacy goes far beyond the monetary value of his fortune.

In the end, the future of bitcoin and its mysterious creator remains shrouded in mystery, promising to captivate the collective imagination for years to come. The debate remains open: what will be the next step in this unprecedented monetary adventure? According to an expert, Bitcoin is set to dive by 40%.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our 'Read to Earn' program! Earn points for each article you read and gain access to exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start accruing benefits.

Fascin par le bitcoin depuis 2017, Evariste n'a cess de se documenter sur le sujet. Si son premier intrt s'est port sur le trading, il essaie dsormais activement dapprhender toutes les avances centres sur les cryptomonnaies. En tant que rdacteur, il aspire fournir en permanence un travail de haute qualit qui reflte l'tat du secteur dans son ensemble.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

Read more:

Bitcoin explodes: Nakamoto in the closed circle of the 25 richest - Cointribune EN

Read More..

Newly released Satoshi emails reveal a treasure trove of early Bitcoin lore – Cointelegraph

A litany of insights into the early days of cryptocurrency were recently revealed when Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamotos earliest collaborator, Martti Malmi, published 120 pages of email correspondences between the two on GitHub on Feb. 23.

The true identity of Nakamoto remains a point of conjecture throughout the greater cryptocurrency and blockchain community. However, the emails recently published on GitHub by Malmi were initially introduced as evidence in a London court case brought by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance against Craig Wright, who has claimed to be Nakamoto.

Based on Cointelegraphs cursory examination of the emails, there are no smoking guns or tell-tale revelations that would immediately shine a light on Satoshis true identity. But for historians and Bitcoin lore enthusiasts, the emails include many fantastic quotes and a general air of Satoshi-ness that same straightforward, simple-yet-comprehensive, no-nonsense style that permeates the Bitcoin white paper.

While its long been posited that Satoshi themselves came up with the term cryptocurrency, one email sent to Malmi on June 11, 2009, appears to poke a major hole in this theory.

Per Satoshi:

To Malmis credit, he responded that it sounds good and added that it sounded more interesting than digital P2P cash.

Malmis email correspondence also demonstrates Satoshis keen understanding of anonymity, what it meant and what the risks of misinformation could mean for Bitcoin.

As Satoshi wrote in one email:

The email continues to essentially predict the rise of blockchain forensics:

Original post:

Newly released Satoshi emails reveal a treasure trove of early Bitcoin lore - Cointelegraph

Read More..

Bitcoin inventor was aware of currency’s power demands – TechHQ

A court case currently underway in London, UK, has made several emails more widely known, that were purportedly written by the inventor of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. In them, they considered the energy use of the Bitcoin network.

The legal case centers on Craig Wrights claims that he is Nakamoto. The real identity of the inventor of the cryptocurrency is not known for certain, and Wrights claims, if validated, will mean that he has a significant say in the future development of Bitcoin projects.

Published in Wired last week, Satoshis emails contained several comments about the networks energy consumption.

If [Bitcoin] did grow to consume significant energy, I think it would still be less wasteful than the labor and resources of intensive conventional banking activity it would replace, Satoshi said in a message to Martii Malmi, one of the early developers of the technology.

The actual levels of power consumption by Bitcoin are uncertain: miners operate in a highly competitive market and so are not inclined to be particularly transparent as to the details of their operations.

Energy consumption comes largely from two activities in the Bitcoin network that consume electricity throwing massive computational power at the process to solve for coins, and the processing required to handle individual transactions when cryptocurrency changes hands.

A well-accepted metric by the Bitcoin industry on energy consumption is the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI), published by the University of Cambridges Judge Business School. The School revised its model in August of last year to take account of the changes in the underpinning technologies and hardware at the heart of the Bitcoin network since 2019. The update is, in part, a response to evidence indicating a periodic overestimation of electricity consumption.

Pollution by sheilaz413 is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

The figure representing the total energy consumption by the Bitcoin network was revised down by 9.8TWh (terawatt hours) for 2022 to 95.5TWh. That places the global systems consumption alongside nation-states like Belgium and the Netherlands. The paper publishing the Indexs revision details also notes that, overall, the efficiency of Bitcoin mining has increased as hardware advances and refines (albeit now at a slower rate than in the currencys hayday).

The environmental impact of Bitcoin operations is even more complex to estimate than their total energy consumption. Renewable energy is said to power a sizeable proportion of mining operations, with estimates varying [paywall] from around 40% to 75% of the total power consumption. Bitcoin mining operations tend to congregate where energy is plentiful from renewable sources, such as hydroelectric power. In these locations, like certain areas of the US, China, and Scandinavia, such hydroelectric power tends to be cheaper than fossil-derived alternatives.

But environmental damage is said also to come from e-waste comprising of discarded mining rigs, which are superseded by faster, more efficient hardware in generational upgrades. Processing a single Bitcoin transaction is said to produce over 700 pounds of carbon, plus there are additional emissions from data center cooling systems and water usage, to name just a couple of other factors.

The two human activities that Bitcoins creator thought might be replaced by Bitcoin, conventional banking and gold mining, still create significantly more negative environmental effects than the entire Bitcoin apparatus, with conventional finance systems alone estimated to produce double the carbon emissions of Bitcoin.

But the slow rate at which Bitcoin transactions can be achieved effectively makes the currency unviable as an everyday means of exchange (there are other networks, such as Ethereum, which are capable of the type of scale required, and which do not use the power-intensive proof-of-work model to mine new coins).

The fact that Bitcoin exists in addition to the activities it was supposed to replace raises the question of its viability. Clearly, the technology cannot be uninvented, and attempts by governments to limit its use have been mostly unsuccessful, with most adopting the accept-and-tax approach to cyrptocurrencies. No governmental control over the Bitcoin was, it has to be said, part of its design remit.

But like renewable energy, which exists as a supplement to fossil-derived power, not as a replacement, Bitcoin and its ecological effects exist in addition to all the consequences of fiat finance.

The Bitcoin networks activities are said to consume the equivalent of around 2%-3% of the USs annual power usage. Lowering power consumption worldwide, year-on-year, is the most important way to downgrade the status of environmental deterioration from an extinction event to merely a chance of survival for the generation that will live at the end of this century. (NB experiencing survival will still be deeply unpleasant.)

Given that Bitcoins purpose at present is just a different flavor of market speculation, and it will not replace conventional finance or gold mining, now might be the time to consider its net utility.

Factory Pollution by plagal is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Read the rest here:

Bitcoin inventor was aware of currency's power demands - TechHQ

Read More..

Satoshi Nakamoto on trial: The Wright case – Marketscreener.com

In a high-profile legal drama that has captured the attention of the finance and cryptocurrency industries, Craig Steven Wright, an Australian who claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of bitcoin, faces a whirlwind of legal scrutiny and challenges. Accusations of forgery, fraud and intimidation tactics We come back to this in Cryptic Analysis, after this week's essential news.

Block 1: Key news

Chainlink joins forces with giant Telefnica

Chainlink Labs has team ed up with Telefnica, a world leader in telecommunications, to integrate its network of oracles into the GSMA Open Gateway initiative, which aims to improve Web3 security. This collaboration aims to protect users against the risk of SIM card piracy, by verifying recent SIM operations to prevent malicious transactions. At the same time, growing interest in decentralized finance (DeFi) and tokenization has boosted the value of the oracle sector, with Chainlink and its LINK token, which has risen by over 20% since the beginning of February, illustrating the positive impact of such initiatives on the value of associated digital assets.

Revolut : Towards the creation of a cryptocurrency platform?

Revolut, which has already been open to cryptocurrency investments for a number of years, is planning to launch a cryptocurrency exchange specifically designed for advanced traders. The initiative, currently in beta phase, promises in-depth analysis tools and low transaction fees, said to gravitate between 0 and 0.09%. Revolut's idea to create an exchange dedicated to crypto-assets dates back to November 2021.

Worldcoin: To the moon?

Worldcoin's WLD token, a project of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, has seen a spectacular rise of over 130% in one week, reaching a price of $5.85. This surge is attributed to the launch of Sora, OpenAI's innovative video AI model, which has heightened investor interest speculation in AI-related cryptocurrencies. On paper, Worldcoin combines an explosive cocktail of AI, blockchain, and biometric recognition, and offers WLD tokens as a reward for iris scanning. Despite regulatory challenges, the project aims to distribute WLD widely, with 3.4 million individuals having already participated.

BlackRock advertises its Bitcoin ETF

BlackRock has launched a new advertising campaign for its Bitcoin ETF, the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), highlighting the simplicity and efficiency of accessing Bitcoin in the same place as stocks and bonds, making investment management easier. The ad highlights the key advantage of a Bitcoin ETF, allowing investors to overcome asset custody constraints while engaging in technological innovation with the slogan "get your share of progress". IBIT continues to grow, with $5.52 billion in assets under management.

BlackRock

Block 2: Crypto analysis of the week

In an extensive cross-examination lasting almost 30 hours, Australian Craig Steven Wright, who claims to be the elusive Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, came under intense scrutiny. M. Wright, a self-proclaimed expert in a variety of fields, including computer science, cryptography, law and mathematics, has been accused of making up facts,

Wright has a history of aggressively asserting his intellectual property over Bitcoin, taking legal action against the cryptocurrency's developers and users. As part of this, the non-profit Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) filed a lawsuit in 2021 to thwart Wright's bullying tactics and confirm once and for all that he is not the inventor of Bitcoin as he claims.

COPA's lead counsel, Jonathan Hough, accused Mr. Wright of having committed nearly a decade of large-scale fraud since his appearance in the spotlight, including falsifying documents relating to Bitcoin's development and demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of the technology he claims to have created.

Nevertheless, many observers believe that Mr. Wright's courtroom performance, marked by inconsistencies and evasions, only served to further discredit him.

The trial, which is expected to continue until mid-March, revealed some bizarre and dubious moments on Mr. Wright's part, including his peculiar justifications for not providing concrete evidence of his identity as Satoshi and his apparent lack of basic programming knowledge.

Wright's behavior and assertions were met with skepticism, including his assertion that he had worked on several PhDs, notably in cryptography and computer science, while demonstrating a lack of understanding of fundamental coding concepts such as "Unsigned Integer", a subject that became particularly contentious during the trial.

In simple terms, these "unsigned integers" are mainly used to determine whether a data string will have a + or - prefix. And without going into too much detail, Mr. Wright was questioned by COPA's counsel about this system during the trial, but was unable to answer. The problem? As long-time cryptography advocate Michael Parenti points out, the "unsigned integers" feature was used over 500 times in Bitcoin's original source code. If Wright was in fact Satoshi, questioning these functions should have been routine.

In 2020, Wright published a blog entitled "As an Autistic Savant..." (in which he explained that he was unable to lie due to his self-diagnosed Asperger's syndrome. During the trial, he explained "lying is not something I do easily or well, and my behavior is not a mark of deception but rather normal for autistic people. I'm brutally honest, but also incredibly accurate".

More broadly, the main strategy of COPA's legal team was to force Wright to account for the hundreds of indications of falsification and manipulation found by an expert in forensic evidence in the e-mails, documents and computer files submitted as exhibits.

When asked by Judge Mellor on Wednesday to produce a single document relating to the first Bitcoin files that did not show signs of tampering, Wright replied that it was not available...

So, is Wright Satoshi or Faketoshi?

Block 3: Gainers & Losers

Crypto chart (Click to enlarge)

MarketScreener

Block 4: Things to read this week

Three technology micro-trends businesses need to know (Wired)

The baffling testimony of Craig Wright, self-proclaimed inventor of Bitcoin (Wired).

Is blockchain ready for Primetime? (Project Syndicate)

Follow this link:

Satoshi Nakamoto on trial: The Wright case - Marketscreener.com

Read More..

Ripple Admired by Bitcoin Founder Satoshi, Recently-Released 2009 Emails Confirm – The Crypto Basic

An email exchange dating back to 2009 with Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto has proved his commendation and praise for the Ripple project.

Martti Malmi, a Bitcoin developer between 2009 and 2011, recently published personal communications with the Bitcoin founder back in 2009, containing words of commendation from Satoshi to Ripple.

In the email correspondence, the Bitcoin developer discussed various aspects of Bitcoin with Satoshi Nakamoto. The developer inquired about the inflation schedule, the total number of coins, denominations, and the possibility of fractional bitcoins.

Satoshi Nakamoto responded by explaining the scalability of Bitcoin, its potential to handle a large number of transactions, and the absence of the necessity for fees in the near future.

While discussing these technical aspects, the Bitcoin developer brought Ripple into the conversation, having recognized the project as a similar revolutionary idea. Specifically, Malmi stated he would love to hear Satoshis thoughts on Ripple.

On this basis, Satoshi Nakamoto expressed admiration for Ripple, describing it as an interesting project. Moreover, he remarked that Ripple is the only other system that does something with trust besides concentrating it on a central server.

- Advertisement -

Another individual, Martien van Steenbergen, inquired about Satoshis familiarity with the Ripple project. Satoshi responded by noting that, in terms of trust systems, Ripple stands out for its unique approach of dispersing trust rather than centralizing it. In his words:

As trust systems go, Ripple is unique in spreading trust around rather than concentrating it.

Notably, some members of the XRP community have occasionally misconstrued Satoshis 2009 comment about Ripple, assuming it as praise for XRP.

However, it is essential to note that Satoshis commentary predated the creation of XRP by three years.

Specifically, Satoshis 2009 comment pertained to the original Ripple protocol known as RipplePay, which was initiated in 2004 by software engineer Ryan Fugger. This early project served as the foundation and inspiration for the creators of the XRP Ledger (XRP).

Follow Us on Twitter and Facebook.

Disclaimer: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basics opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

-Advertisement-

Read more:

Ripple Admired by Bitcoin Founder Satoshi, Recently-Released 2009 Emails Confirm - The Crypto Basic

Read More..

Why is Bitcoin Capped at 21 million? Satoshi Nakamoto’s Emails Reveal – CoinGape

Few questions in the world of cryptocurrency are as mysterious and long-lasting as the explanation for why Bitcoin has a maximum supply cap of 21 million tokens. Satoshi Nakamoto, the elusive founder of Bitcoin, provided clues through personal communication that offer insight into this critical choice. We will explore the insights from Nakamotos emails to understand the reasoning behind this interesting limit.

The curtain lifts on Satoshi Nakamotos decision-making process through an email exchange with Martii Malmi, an early contributor to Bitcoins development. Nakamoto acknowledges that the choice of 21 million as Bitcoins supply cap was not randomly chosen but rather an educated guess. This figure was carefully selected to strike a balance between aligning Bitcoins pricing dynamics with established traditional currencies while adapting to future market uncertainties.

My choice for the number of coins and distribution schedule was an educated guess. It was a difficult choice, because once the network is going its locked in and were stuck with it. I wanted to pick something that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, thats very hard. I ended up picking something in the middle Nakamoto

Nakamotos foresight extended beyond mere numerical selection. With a keen eye on scalability and global adoption, limiting Bitcoin to 21 million tokens was a strategic move. This limited supply, representing a fraction of global commerce, ensured that Bitcoin could maintain its value proposition in a changing economic environment.

At the core of Nakamotos correspondence is a vision of Bitcoin seamlessly integrating into the network of global commerce. The intent was for Bitcoins unit prices to eventually mirror those of traditional fiat currencies, fostering ease of adoption and interoperability. Nakamoto envisioned a future where 0.001 BTC could equate to 1 Euro, a concept that resonated with the goal of positioning Bitcoin as a viable currency alternative. It appears that Nakamotos forecast was slightly inaccurate. 0.001 BTC is now valued at 47.62 Euro, nearly 11 times their initial illustration.

To accommodate varying price scales, Nakamoto introduced the concept of granularity, enabling flexible adjustments to Bitcoins display units. This foresight ensured that as Bitcoin gained traction, its usability wouldnt be hindered by cumbersome decimal conversions, thereby enhancing its practicality in everyday transactions.

If Bitcoin remains a small niche, itll be worth less per unit than existing currencies. If you imagine it being used for some fraction of world commerce, then theres only going to be 21 million coins for the whole world, so it would be worth much more per unit. Values are 64-bit integers with 8 decimal places, so 1 coin is represented internally as 100000000. Theres plenty of granularity if typical prices become small. For example, if 0.001 is worth 1 Euro, then it might be easier to change where the decimal point is displayed, so if you had 1 Bitcoin its now displayed as 1000, and 0.001 is displayed as 1 Nakamoto

While Nakamoto provided insight into the rationale behind selecting 21 million as Bitcoins supply cap, the mechanics behind this figure remain an intriguing subject. One prevailing theory revolves around dissecting Bitcoins distribution model, particularly its block reward system.

By stipulating that new blocks be added to Bitcoins blockchain every 10 minutes on average, and that miner rewards halve every four years, Nakamoto unintentionally set the stage for the 21 million cap. Through mathematical speculation, enthusiasts on Stack Exchange have projected the maximum number of Bitcoins that can ever exist, arriving at the iconic figure of 21 million.

Calculate the number of blocks per four year cycle:

6 blocks per hour

* 24 hours per day

* 365 days per year

* 4 years per cycle

= 210,240

~= 210,000

Sum all the block reward sizes:

50 + 25 + 12.5 + 6.25 + 3.125 + = 100

Multiply the two:

210,000 * 100 = 21 million.

The unveiling of Satoshi Nakamotos emails reveals the complex network of decisions supporting Bitcoins limited supply. Every aspect, from strategic planning to mathematical luck, adds to the aura of the top cryptocurrency globally. As Bitcoin grows and makes its mark in the digital landscape, the importance of its capped supply limit showcases Nakamotos forward-thinking design. Although the origins of 21 million Bitcoin are uncertain, it is evident that its unchangeable supply cap is not merely a numerical threshold, but is essential to its lasting value in the evolving financial landscape.

Read the original here:

Why is Bitcoin Capped at 21 million? Satoshi Nakamoto's Emails Reveal - CoinGape

Read More..