Page 3,963«..1020..3,9623,9633,9643,965..3,9703,980..»

Dash Surges by Over 16% as Bitcoin Price Hovers At $8,100 – Cointelegraph

Sunday, Jan. 12 most of the top cryptocurrencies are reporting moderate gains on the day by press time, as Bitcoin (BTC) hovers around the $8,100 mark again.

Market visualization courtesy of Coin360

Among the top cryptocurrencies, the one that has seen the most growth over the last 24 hours is DASH, which was up by around 16.27% at its peak. The coin currently stands at $66.84 with a 13% gain over the past 24 hours. The weekly chart shows a growth of 33.7%.

Dash 7-day price chart. Source:Coin360

Also NEO has seen notable growth, with its current price of $10.35 being exactly 7.45% higher than the same time yesterday. Over the last week, the coin grew by 11.44%.

Neo 7-day price chart. Source:Coin360

Bitcoin price is currently up by 0.48% on the day, trading at around $8,102 at press time, according to Coin360. Looking at its weekly chart, the coin is up by about 8.28%.

Bitcoin 7-day price chart. Source:Coin360

Ether (ETH) is holding onto its position as the largest altcoin by market cap, which currently stands at $15.8 billion. The second-largest altcoin, Ripples XRP, has a market cap of $9.3 billion at press time.

Coin360 data shows that ETH has seen its value increase by about 1.37% over the last 24 hours. At press time, ETH is trading around $144. On the week, the coin has also gained about 5.1% in value.

Ether 7-day price chart. Source:Coin360

XRP is up by about 2.04% over the last 24 hours and is currently trading at $0.214. On the week, the coin is up by 10.3%. The coins price is still holding on to a big portion of the gains that it obtained at the beginning of the week.

XRP 7-day price chart. Source:Coin360

At press time, the total market capitalization of all cryptocurrencies is $217 billion, about 8.66% higher than the value it reported a week ago.

View post:
Dash Surges by Over 16% as Bitcoin Price Hovers At $8,100 - Cointelegraph

Read More..

As Bitcoin Struggles, This Minor Cryptocurrency Is Up Almost 500% Over The Past 12 Months – Forbes

Bitcoin has had a mixed start to the new year. The price has climbed, most likely for potentially controversial reasonsbut, meanwhile, at least one minor cryptocurrency is going from strength to strength.

The bitcoin price has climbed over the first few days of 2020 but has failed to make meaningful gains and breakout of its long-running malaise, leaving many cryptocurrency traders and investors disappointed.

However, chainlink, a top 20 cryptocurrency traded under the name link boasting an $800 million market capitalization, has risen 25% already in 2020bringing its year-on-year rise close to a staggering 500%.

The bitcoin price has outperformed most major cryptocurrencies over the last year but some smaller ... [+] tokens, including chainlink, are making huge gains.

The chainlink price reached its highest in late June of 2019, hitting $4.55 and up over 1800% from the start of 2019.

The massive rally was caused by interest in chainlink from China, the world's largest bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchange by volume, Binance, working with chainlink developers so-called decentralized finance products, and search giant Google using chainlink's blockchain to bridge legacy databases.

"As with most blockchain projects in their infancy given the low liquidity initially, any surge in demand is likely to cause significant impact on price," said Simon Peters, bitcoin and crypto analyst at investment platform eToro.

The chainlink price has fallen back somewhat from its all-time high but has broken the broader cryptocurrency downward trendwith almost all so-called altcoins failing to recover after the brutal crypto winter of late 2018 and early 2019.

The chainlink price hits an all-time high of $4.54 back in July of last year and has since fallen ... [+] back from there but remains significantly up on the start of 2019.

"With chainlink developers working with the likes of Swift to help connect banks to smart contracts, as well as major companies like Google, naturally this has caused excitement around the potential of the platform going forward," Peters added.

"This has subsequently encouraged investors to buy the link token, speculating on the project's future success. With link prices increasing over the last year, this was further compounded by the 'fear of missing out' phenomenon."

Continue reading here:
As Bitcoin Struggles, This Minor Cryptocurrency Is Up Almost 500% Over The Past 12 Months - Forbes

Read More..

What to expect from cryptocurrency legislation in 2020 – Yahoo Finance

One of the most heated debates in the cryptocurrency space is the future of regulation and whether financial regulatory bodies should oversee the trading of crypto coins.

Just last month, a group of United States congressmen put forward a new cryptocurrency bill labeled the Cryptocurrency Act 2020.

The goal of the new legislation is to provide additional clarification on digital asset regulations. The bill has some wide-ranging regulations that, if voted into law, could reshape the crypto landscape moving forward at least in the United States, that is.

The US senator who put forward the Cryptocurrency Act 2020, Paul Goser, stated that it was his desire to attribute regulatory clarity to the market.

Currently, many cryptocurrency regulations across the world are vague. Consumers and lawmakers are locked in a debate over which agencies are responsible for regulating different types of cryptocurrencies.

Some companies, like EOS or Telegram, have even been fined for conducting unregulated securities, for instance.

In this article, Ill discuss what to expect from regulators in 2020 with a focus on the Cryptocurrency Act 2020, since I believe it could have a significant impact on the space.

In November last year, Coin Rivet reported that the US Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) has called for tighter regulations on stablecoins and digital assets.

As part of its latest annual report, the council identified digital assets and stablecoins as major areas for concern, urging closer scrutiny of existing laws and a review of new products in the blockchain space.

In October, the Central Bank of Russia revealed it is against the integration of cryptocurrencies in the public monetary system, even though some banks and politicians, Vladimir Putin included, have insisted on adopting crypto regulations instead of banning digital coins.

On January 10 2020, the European Union (EU) will implement a new law known as the EU Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) which requires cryptocurrency platforms and wallet providers to identify their customers for anti-money laundering purposes.

Some countries such as Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands are expected to implement the 5AMLD law by the deadline this week, but other nations are resisting it.

The United Kingdom has decided to implement the law despite its decision to leave the EU.

Mexico is also reportedly taking a harder stance on fintech and cryptocurrency companies.

We can clearly see the current trend is moving towards increased regulation and oversight across the globe.

The Cryptocurrency Act 2020 begins with the categorisation of cryptocurrencies into three main groups. These groups are then used to determine which agencies are responsible for the creation of regulation and legislation. The first class described in the new bill is cryptocurrencies.

The crypto class includes Bitcoin, Litecoin, and any other cryptocurrencies that dont fall under the current securities regulations. The bill classifies these tokens as any digital asset that includes representations of United States currency or synthetic derivatives resting on a blockchain or decentralised cryptographic ledger.

Smart contracts and oracles fall under the cryptocurrency category as well.

The next class described in the bill is crypto-commodities. A key aspect of these tokens is the fact that they contain some form of substantial fungibility.

Fungible assets are interchangeable, such as the USD. These assets must reside on a blockchain or decentralised cryptographic ledger to fall under this classification.

The final type of coin described in the bill is crypto-securities. These tokens are simply any coin that fails the Howey Test.

The three regulatory bodies mentioned in the bill that will oversee the cryptocurrency space include the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

These groups will gain sole authority over their respective digital asset types.

We have witnessed a clear and transparent shift from government bodies, especially in the US, towards the regulation of digital assets since the announcement of Facebooks Libra. I expect more legislation in the near future, even though I highly doubt its long-term effectiveness.

However, if regulation brings more businesses and companies into the space, thats a good thing. Hopefully, well see companies taking this wave of regulation as a sign for adoption.

The post What to expect from cryptocurrency legislation in 2020 appeared first on Coin Rivet.

View post:
What to expect from cryptocurrency legislation in 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

South Korea Moves Toward Institutional Acceptance of Cryptocurrency – Nasdaq

By Landon Manning

The South Korean Presidential Committee on the Fourth Industrial Revolution (PCFIR), a committee focused on coordinating regulatory policy around cutting-edge technology in the country, has made recommendations that the government work toward institutional acceptance of crypto assets, causing some to speculate that South Korea is preparing for a crypto arms race against the Chinese digital yuan.

Local media outletBusiness Koreareportedon January 6, 2020, that the PCFIR suggested that the Korean government allow financial institutions to launch cryptocurrency-related products, such as Bitcoin derivatives, as a medium- and long-term strategy for the institutionalization of cryptocurrencies.

As part of this strategy of working toward both nearer and longer term goals, the committee also recommended the development and implementation of a Korean custody solution to avoid relying solely on foreign custodians in the process of handling crypto assets.

This problem seems especially salient for South Korea, as it also formally recommended directly listing bitcoin for sale on Korea Exchange, the nations sole securities operator. Additionally, the report called for the legalization of private firms selling futures on bitcoin products. For this latter measure, the report explicitly drew comparisons to governments like the United States, which have enacted similar measures, calling these regulations a model to be emulated.

Given the way that the PCFIR referenced the international crypto industry, specifically claiming that it is no longer possible to stop crypto-asset trade worldwide, commentators havedrawn attentionto Chinas test phase of developing its own state-backed crypto asset: the digital yuan. The Chinese economy being a significant competitor to South Koreas in a wide range of areas (and also considering Chinas support for North Korea) adds validity to this notion that South Korea has a rivalry with the economic giant in mind in its own approach to formal crypto adoption.

The proposal of these new measures has not been the only crypto-friendly overture from the South Korean government recently. On December 30, 2019, the Ministry of Finance and Strategyconfirmedthat nothing in the countrys tax code currently supports the taxation of capital gains made through trading cryptocurrencies. Although there has been some chatter that the government will seek to tighten its tax codes in the future, concrete legislative attempts are yet to materialize.

Although it is unclear what amount of material resources the South Korean government will commit to the promotion of cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies, the suggestion that it will allow private firms more leeway to expand their services independently is a good start. As the possible global implications of Chinas new program begin to crystallize, South Koreas response will surely also become clearer.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

Read more:
South Korea Moves Toward Institutional Acceptance of Cryptocurrency - Nasdaq

Read More..

Cryptocurrency Market Cap May Surge 37%. But There’s One ‘If’ – U.Today

In a recent Eth2.0 Implementation Call 31, Ethereum's lead developers agreed on aswitch between Ethereum (ETH) 1.0 and Ethereum (ETH) 2.0. Initially,this issue hadnot been on the agenda but the discussion started towards the end of the call.

The question of network status transition without sacrificing the security and consensus integrity iscrucialto the Ethereum (ETH) 2.0 progress. It's obvious that during the interim period, both Ethereum (ETH) 1.0 and Ethereum (ETH) 2.0 rules should be followed by validators.

In December 2019, Vitalik Buterin of the Ethereum Foundation suggested that this could be achieved through the network of 'friendly validators'.

Must Read

'Stateless Clients' procedure will allow validators to avoid downloading both ETH1 and ETH2 nodes. According to Mr Buterin, the second one can now be operated using machines with limited resources.

Right now we've worked hard to make the total eth2 state size under 1 GB so that you can do everything in RAM and so that the requirements can be lower than the eth1 system today.

As a result, the initial stage of Ethereum 2.0 will be launched without stateless miners and WebAssembly.

The new release of Ethereum 2.0 specifications (network operational rules) has also been delivered.This release (v 0.10.0)contains a deep and much-needed reorganization of files/directories.

As explained by Danny Ryan, Ethereum (ETH) 2.0 team lead:

New release marks a stable target for Phase 0 for multi-client testnets and security reviews.

Let's try to predict, when Ethereum (ETH) 2.0 will be shipped? Tell us in The Comments!

Read more:
Cryptocurrency Market Cap May Surge 37%. But There's One 'If' - U.Today

Read More..

Financial Services Agency to limit leverage in cryptocurrency margin trading to twice the deposits made by traders – The Japan Times

The Financial Services Agency plans to introduce a rule limiting the leverage in cryptocurrency margin trading to twice the deposits of traders, it was learned Friday.

The regulation, which is stricter than the industrys self-imposed cap of four times, will be established to reduce the risks of losses ballooning due to volatile price fluctuations.

The new rule will be included in a Cabinet Office order linked to the revised Financial Instruments and Exchange Act which will go into force in spring, informed sources said.

Cryptocurrencies have been hailed as the payment method of the future partly thanks to their low remittance fees. But the actual use has not reflected these expectations.

Some 80 to 90 percent of the transactions via cryptocurrency exchanges are speculative margin trading.

The FSA discussed leverage regulation with an industry body, the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association, after the revised law was passed by the Diet in May last year.

The agency has decided on the leverage cap of two times based on past price fluctuations and cryptocurrency regulations in Europe and the United States, the sources said.

The association plans to review its rules to reflect the new regulation. Exchange operators are expected to be pressured to alter their business models as the new regulations may lead speculative traders to lose interest in cryptocurrency margin trading.

See the original post here:
Financial Services Agency to limit leverage in cryptocurrency margin trading to twice the deposits made by traders - The Japan Times

Read More..

Directors of bogus Ugandan cryptocurrency startup charged after 4,000 investor complaints – The Next Web

After appearing in court this week, the full impact of a Uganda-based cryptocurrency scam is starting to reveal itself.

Following its collapse last year, Ugandan police have logged 4,000 complaints against cryptocurrency startup Dunamiscoins Resources Ltd.

Two directors of the company, Samson Lwanga and Mary Nabunya, appeared in court on Monday this week. They were charged with 65 counts of obtaining money under false pretense and conspiracy to commit a felony, The Observer reports.

Prosecutors allege the pair operated their illicit cryptocurrency-based scam between February 14, 2018 and December 3, 2019.

According to the report, Lwanga and Nabunya managed to obtain more than $37,000 (140,050,000 Ugandan shillings) by promising dozens of investors unrealistic returns.

Previous reports claimed the Dunamiscoins scam has managed to con more than 10 billion Ugandan shillings (ca. $2.7 million) out of its victims.

The pair reportedly recruited hundreds of people into their fake cryptocurrency scheme, which like many others, promised unrealistic returns on investments.

Whats more, Dunamiscoins set up offices and hired a number of local citizens in Masaka Town who, after being asked by the firm, also invested in the company.

However, a month later in December, the offices closed unexpectedly leaving people out of work. In some cases, employees hadnt even completed their first day.

The two directors have reportedly said they are willing to refund victims. The only problem however, is that their bank accounts are frozen by the countrys Financial Intelligence Authority so they claim.

The suspects pleaded not guilty to the claims and are due to be questioned again later in the month. They remain in custody until then.

But with the growing numbers of complaints against the collapsed firm, a lot of questions remain unanswered.

Published January 8, 2020 09:07 UTC

Read the original here:
Directors of bogus Ugandan cryptocurrency startup charged after 4,000 investor complaints - The Next Web

Read More..

Naive IoT botnet wastes its time mining cryptocurrency – ZDNet

Image: Peter Kruse

Security researchers from Romanian antivirus vendor Bitdefender have discovered a botnet that infects home routers and other Internet of Things (IoT) smart devices and then attempts to mine for cryptocurrency.

This marks the third such IoT botnet that wastes its time by attempting to mine cryptocurrency on devices that clearly don't support these types of operations.

Named LiquorBot, the botnet was first spotted in May 2019, according to a report Bitdefender published yesterday.

The botnet is nothing special in terms of technical capabilities. It works just like any other IoT botnet that's been documented over the past few years. Below is a short summary of LiquorBot's features:

About the only novel detail about LiquorBot is the fact that the malware is a version of the Mirai strain rewritten in the Go programming language -- but that's about it.

Most IoT botnets today usually appear and disappear within weeks or months. LiquorBot is a strange case because it remained active throughout all 2019.

Bitdefender says the malware often received updates, usually in the form of new exploits. The most interesting update was, however, recorded in October.

The company says the LiquorBot code was expanded with a module that attempted to mine the Monero (XMR) cryptocurrency on infected devices.

The module, in itself, is quite useless, seeing that the entire botnet is predicated on infected routers, above anything else.

SOHO (Small Office Home Office) routers are cheap devices that lack the CPU and hardware capabilities to adequately mine cryptocurrency -- which is a very resource-heavy operation.

In the past, other IoT botnets have also wasted their time attempting to mine cryptocurrency on SOHO routers, with little success, and with all dropping any attempts within weeks, primarily due to the low yield the hacked devices were turning in.

The first IoT botnet to experiment with the feature was a Mirai-based botnet operated out of China, back in March 2017. The botnet experiment with a Bitcoin-mining module for a week, before dropping the module altogether.

The second was an IoT malware strain named Linux.MulDrop.14, detected by Dr.Web in June 2017. This botnet targeted Raspberry Pi devices, where it also attempted to mine Bitcoin. While Raspberry Pi devices have access to more hardware resources than your casual SOHO router, this botnet didn't break the bank either, stopping its experiments after a few weeks.

The discovery of these two botnets in 2017 encouraged researchers to look into the possibility of IoT botnets of being used as cryptocurrency mining farms. At the time, Errata Security estimated that if a Mirai botnet of 2.5 million bots mined cryptocurrency it would earn only a meager $0.25 per day, effectively dispelling the notion that IoT botnets could ever be used for cryptocurrency mining.

Apparently, the LiquorBot author didn't get the notice.

Continue reading here:
Naive IoT botnet wastes its time mining cryptocurrency - ZDNet

Read More..

Can digital gold Bitcoin ever be mined in India? – ETCIO.com

Bitcoin has gained tremendous popularity since its launch in 2009, sending ripples across major economies of the world. The cryptocurrency witnessed massive interest among investors, so much so that the price shot up to a whopping $20,000 apiece in 2017, thereafter plummeting and rallying around $10,000 in 2019. The prices saw extreme rallies owing to a strong combination of global investor interest and pure speculation. The block-chain powered currency has sparked several controversies with respect to the lack of global regulation, legality, and potency of misuse.

However, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was quick enough to pick the red flags before the Bitcoinbubble burst. The biggest problem with Bitcoin, also popularly known as digital gold is that it has no collateral-backing, which essentially means that the intrinsic value is zero and the prices are purely based on speculation. Moreover, there are no guidelines or regulations governing the trading and use of the virtual currency as a legal tender.

The Indian central bank sent out multiple public warnings and caution notices regarding the risks associated with Bitcoin and eventually enforced a ban on Bitcoin trading in India vide a notification on April 6, 2018. Thereafter, a blanket ban on cryptocurrencies was planned with a draft policy Banning of Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill 2019 and is under process.

ETBFSI had earlier reported that the RBI had called for a banking restriction on all financial institutions offering services to cryptocurrency exchanges, that led many Indian startups Bitcoin India, Koinex, Zebpay to close operations or moved outside India or launched P2P platforms to sustain.

Does the virtual currency need regulatory support rather than an outright ban? The use of virtual currency can bring a sea change in the way transactions take place in an economy. The advantages seem to outweigh the risks associated with the use of virtual currency when brought under a regulatory framework of the RBI and SEBI. The blockchain technology would allow secure P2P transactions and could be easily monitored by the regulators. On the other hand, SEBI regulated virtual currency exchanges may be established to regulate the market movements and trading activities associated with the crypto-currencies. Further, the use of virtual currencies would lower transaction costs and could potentially eliminate the need of paper currency, thereby boosting efficiency in the monetary system.

The rest is here:
Can digital gold Bitcoin ever be mined in India? - ETCIO.com

Read More..

321 Cryptocurrency Whales Control Staggering Amounts of Bitcoin, Ethereum And Litecoin – The Daily Hodl

New research is revealing just how concentrated the ownership of wealth is among the leading cryptocurrencies by market cap.

Blockchain analytics firm IntoTheBlock is releasing its latest findings on the consolidation of crypto accross some of the biggest coins by market cap. The crypto intelligence company says 321 crypto whales control huge amounts of wealth in the Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin ecosystems.

Although Bitcoin transactions are traceable, the identities of most addresses remains shrouded in mystery, often owned by early investors and in some cases cryptocurrency exchanges.

As for Bitcoin, IntoTheBlock says just 39 whales hold 11.1% of all of existing BTC. For Ethereum, 154 addresses hold 40% of all ETH, and for Litecoin 128 addresses hold 47% of all LTC.

Meanwhile, over half of the circulating supply of Tether is in the hands of 140 wallets.

Heres a breakdown of all the coins in the study.

With a $36.3 billion 24-hour trading volume, Tether is currently outpacing Bitcoins volume at $29.9 billion. The stablecoin is widely used to hedge against the markets notoriously wild swings.

On the surface, the accumulation of coins in the hands of the few may seem like bad news. However, there may be a benefit to the long-term health of the crypto industry. In theory, whales can help keep the price of digital coins stable. Unlike retail traders, they rarely dump at the first sign of weakness. In addition, whales can help carve a bear market bottom as they tend to accumulate when prices dip.

Check Latest News Headlines

Featured Image: Shutterstock/22August

See the article here:
321 Cryptocurrency Whales Control Staggering Amounts of Bitcoin, Ethereum And Litecoin - The Daily Hodl

Read More..