Page 3,884«..1020..3,8833,8843,8853,886..3,8903,900..»

Stakes For Bitcoin Are Highest Since The 2017 Bubble – Forbes

Getty Images

Bitcoins chart is at a crucial area. Stuck between lower highs since 2017 but higher lowers in its long-term trend, and the heralded havening around the corner, bitcoin speculators expect King Crypto to be on the verge of a monster move higher. But if bitcoin serves the purpose that true believers think it will, the next big move is likely to be lower.

The most important debate around crypto is whether investors should think of bitcoin as a safe haven asset like gold and bonds. Its the question that matters most to true believers, who see bitcoin as the solution to global central banks undermining fiat currencies. But at least in the short-term, evidence from the global economy suggests central banks will be able to stay out of the picture. If bitcoin really is a safe haven, then it should resume its trend lower.

Theres no perfect box in which to put bitcoin, but bitcoins overall trend the last 12 months higher during spring and summer of 2019, lower highs until December does to a large degree match the trajectory of bonds and gold. And it makes a good bit of sense, if you accept that bitcoin trades on belief that it could be a potential store of value in a world awash with cheap money.

More specifically, bitcoin is best thought of as a *subset* of traditional safe-haven assets. Because bitcoin is viewed by enough of its investor base as a way to bet on excessive central bank activity that will one day undermine the value of fiat currencies, it moves in relation to expectations of central bank activity. Its rallied when the economic outlook looks rough, because right now, the market equates uncertainty to central bank activity.

Fed cuts also support bond bulls and gold bulls. This is why bitcoin has been trending lower since the summer of last year as a U.S.-China trade deal came to fruition, the Fed was able to pause its cut cycle, and the global economy turned toward stability. Bonds and gold followed, but bitcoin had the most pronounced move, because it has the most riding on central bank cuts. If negative interest rates peaked last year, economies stabilize, and the existing financial system is not broken enough to demand a solution to fiat money, bitcoins use-case falters.

It doesnt have the same track record as gold, and bonds attract buyers for all kinds of reasons. Bitcoin has the most to prove, the biggest hype to live up to, and will swing the most as those interest-rate expectations change. One could loosely describe it as a high-beta haven trade, assuming the solution to economic risk means interest rate cuts. And so as coronavirus sent the odds of another Fed cut soaring this year, bitcoin, bond and gold all rallied.

Yet right now its looking weary next to its safe-haven peers. Gold broke out to a new 7-year high this year, bonds are the highest since early October, and bitcoin is struggling to break 10,000. Overhead pressure from bubble-buyers and whales likely remains, and U.S. economic data is crushing expectations. If this continues, the odds of a rate-cut will likely revert lower, and the trend lower in bitcoin should, according to this theory, resume downward too.

Or will it?

The exception to bitcoins trend as a safety asset is of course 2017. The epic bubble in crypto then looked a lot more like the melt-up in risk assets like stocks than anything in bonds or gold. So what do we conclude if it indeed explodes higher? Unclear, but unless it comes with a big deterioration in the economic outlook, its probably a sign of gross speculation gone AWOL once more. In that case, its best thought of as a risk asset more similar to stocks and thats not good for its long-term viability.

View post:
Stakes For Bitcoin Are Highest Since The 2017 Bubble - Forbes

Read More..

Is There Any Truth to the Tesla-Bitcoin Parallels? – CCN.com

Thanks to a significant uptick in Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock since the start of 2020, a new narrative has emerged: Tesla stock isapparentlythe new bitcoin. But is there any truth to this beyond a trivial analytic link?

The chronicle of Teslas price surgeand its kinship to BTCis being picked apart by nearly every analyst of late. One of the most recent speculators to highlight the quasi-relationship is Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mike McGlone.

Speaking on an episode of Charting Futures, McGlone observed that Teslas stock price seems to be mimicking its 2013 performancea year that witnessed TSLA explode from $32 to $190 in the space of nine months:

On the long-term chart, [TSLA] trades just like it did in 2013, which was one of the biggest years ever. And by the way, that was the biggest year ever for Bitcoin and it looks to me like youre seeing a little bit of Bitcoin catching up.

McGlone certainly isnt alone in his thinking. A variety of crypto (and some non-crypto) commentators have also noted the TSLA-BTC connection. Crypto trader Scott Melker even suggested that Tesla stock was imitating bitcoins infamous 2017 bull runprompting somewhat of a sell signal:

You cant blame people for drawing comparisons. TSLA has gone on a parabolic streak since late October, climbing from $254 to a peak of $887 in early February. That marks a massive 250% increase in a little over three months. Remind you of anything?

Given this integral turning point for Tesla, its understandable why many are making the bitcoin-Tesla connection.

According to McGlone, while the assets charts appear to be lining up, the primary correlation between the pair remains their disruptive nature:

Theyre different assets but theyre the worlds most significant disruptive technologies with name recognition all around the world.

McGlone is right. Tesla is an undoubtedly innovative company. Its intention to supersede outmoded gas guzzlers makes it a highly relevant disruptor, especially in the age of environmental awareness.

Rather than cornering the market, as disruptive innovations typically dooften by producing a cheap and effective productTeslas success has instead drawn in multiple competitors. For example, the Chevrolet Bolt, Hyundai Ioniq, and Nissan Leaf, among others, come in at a more palatable cost compared to the Tesla Model 3, with its lofty $39,490 price tag.

Nevertheless, there is unquestionably a demand for Tesla. Last year the firm managing to seize 16% of the electric vehicle market despite established competition.

As a world-renowned pioneer of the electric vehicle industry, Teslas demand will likely continue to grow.

And then theres bitcoin.

Once touted as the death knell for the traditional financial industry, bitcoins allure as a disruptor has all but dissipated in recent years. Despite being a pioneer of blockchain technology and digital payments, a deficiency in adoption has curbed bitcoins goal of financial dominance.

For the most part, Bitcoin losing its disruptor status arises from a trifecta of woes: regulation, innovation and categorization.

A lack of cohesive regulation has left BTC adoption staggered across multiple jurisdictions. In the U.S., while the SEC continues to debate over security classifications of specific cryptocurrencies, the IRS defines bitcoin as property for U.S. federal tax purposes,andthe CFTC considers digital assets commodities. All of which contribute to the confusion.

Constant disagreement as to its use case has similarly buckled bitcoinwith no real consensus as to whether its a store of value, a medium of exchange, or both. As a consequence, the markets have become saturated. The cryptocurrency markets are now chock-full of bitcoin derivatives, each touting a sounder use-case than the lastproviding further dilution in bitcoins mission toward disruption.

Perhaps most damning of all is the argument that blockchain is a better disruptor than bitcoin.

Bitcoin, not blockchain is an adage typically used by non-believers. From Goldman Sachs President Gary Cohnto U.S. defense agency DARPA, those who rank BTC lower than its underlying tech appear to be winning the debate.

Last April, Forbes released its Blockchain 50 lista round-up for billion-dollar companies employing blockchain tech. The list included big shots such as Amazon Web Services, BBVA (Spains second-largest bank), Citigroup and, of course, Facebook. All of which tend to turn a blind eye toward bitcoin itself.

At the end of it, despite what analysts say, bitcoins relationship with Tesla is negligible at best, and downright ridiculous at worst.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of CCN.com.

This article was edited by Sam Bourgi.

Last modified: February 7, 2020 3:19 PM UTC

Read more here:
Is There Any Truth to the Tesla-Bitcoin Parallels? - CCN.com

Read More..

Crypto Researcher Hasu Flags Attack That Could Bring ‘Purge’-Style Mayhem to Bitcoin – Coindesk

Pseudonymous researcher Hasu has discovered a new twist on a well-known potential attack on the bitcoin network.

The researcher posted a description of the attack, which he named "Purge" after the B-movie franchise, to the bitcoin developer email list last week. It's a variation on the so-called sabotage attack, in which malicious miners try to wreak havoc on bitcoin for the sake of wreaking havoc, rather than for profit.

Purge attacks probably dont constitute a bigger risk than other known forms of sabotage attacks, but seem like an interesting spin," he wrote.

In the dystopia of the "Purge" films, the U.S. government legalizes all crime for one night every year to unleash a sort of national catharsis. Hasu said he chose the name "because the attacker doesnt (primarily) steal money himself, he makes theft legal in the network for a short period of time."

In short, the attack opens the possibility that in very particular circumstances some users could spend their bitcoins more than once, something the unique technology behind bitcoin is supposed to prevent.

To be clear: The scenario is hypothetical, like many others bitcoin researchers have identified in their efforts to steel the network against real-world sabotage attempts. Anticipating the danger is a first step toward preventing or at least mitigating it.

In order to execute a purge attack, a rogue miner would replace an already accepted block with an empty one, pushing transactions that were previously seen as final back into the "mempool," which is like a waitlist for transactions. Then, anyone who sent a transaction during that time can spend the same coin twice.

The new type of sabotage could be used to "undermine trust in bitcoin's assurances," such as the assurance that transactions are after a time "final," meaning irreversible. "Possible attackers could include nation-states hostile to bitcoin as well as terrorist organizations," Hasu added.

Further, Purge is different from other sabotage attacks because the users who are suddenly allowed to double-spend could get incentive to go along with the attack.

"Because Purge gives normal users a way to benefit from the attack, the attacker hopes that it will be harder to coordinate a response quicklybecause whoever benefited from the attack has an incentive to defend the attack chain," Hasu told CoinDesk.

But while Purge is a new idea, its not necessarily worse than other known attacks. Hasu also points to a couple of lines of defense: One, the risk to the attacker of losing block rewards, which are expensive to win and could decline in value if the attack shakes confidence in bitcoin; and two, the strength of bitcoins pre-coordination.

The full report (on bitcoin futures exchange Deribit's blog) dives into much more detail.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Go here to read the rest:
Crypto Researcher Hasu Flags Attack That Could Bring 'Purge'-Style Mayhem to Bitcoin - Coindesk

Read More..

Bitcoin SV (BSV) Jumps 17% Out of Nowhere – newsBTC

The price 0f Bitcoin SV (BSV) on Saturday surged by up to 17 percent in what appears to be a whale-influenced pump.

The BSV-to-dollar exchange rate climbed from $288.71 to as high as $343.53 in just four hours. The pairs move uphill followed days of choppy sideways action and a humongous 300 percent jump before, showing that Bitcoin SV is initiating a run towards its year-to-date top of circa $458.

Bitcoin SV jumps exponentially to break out of its flag range | Source: TradingView.com, BitFinex

The jump came even though the rest of the cryptocurrency tokens were going through a corrective phase after a long uptrend. Top asset bitcoin, for instance, plunged 0.12 percent whilst the second-best Ethereum was up modestly by 1.91 percent. XRP plunged by more than 2.5 percent on a 24-adjusted timeframe.

Bitcoin SVs gains also followed a snub from Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales over the blockchain projects involvement with the information portal.

Mr. Wales, who will be joining Bitcoin SV and team at their CoinGeek London conference as keynote speaker, found himself in the midst of rumors stating that he supports Craig Wright, the Bitcoin SV founder who claims to be the original creator of Bitcoin. However, in a tweet published Friday, Mr. Wales refuted the claim.

Your marketing materials need to be updated immediately as people seem to be reading this as some kind of endorsement from me, clarified Mr. Wales. Im coming to speak my mind, which includes that BSV offers nothing for Wikipedia and that there is zero chance we would ever use it.

BSV bulls clearly ignored the red flags raised by the Wikipedia founder. Just twelve hours into Mr. Wales tweet, the BSV-to-dollar exchange rate jumped.

The latest BSV jump is looking to confirm a bull pennant pattern.

BSV Bull Pennant close to being confirmed | Source: TradingView.com, BitFinex

In retrospect, Bitcoin SV is coming out from the redded triangle range, accompanied by a jump in volume, which confirms a breakout for now. That said, the cryptocurrency could continue its bull run at least towards its year-to-date high of $458 and beyond.

For day traders, those with low-risk appetite could open a long position towards $353 while maintaining a stop loss just below $332-support. Meanwhile, those who are unconvinced with Bitcoin SVs sudden jump could enter a short position towards $284, a Fibonacci level that coincides with the blacked 50-daily moving average.

Read more:
Bitcoin SV (BSV) Jumps 17% Out of Nowhere - newsBTC

Read More..

Bitcoin logs best January performance in 7 years as value surges by nearly $40 billion – CNBC

A man passes in front of a Bitcoin exchange shop in Krakow, Poland.

Artur Widak | NurPhoto | Getty Images

Bitcoin logged its best performance for the month of January since 2013 driven by safe-haven buying as global equity markets remain shaky following the outbreak of the coronavirus from China.

The cryptocurrency was up over 29% in January as the market capitalization or value of all bitcoin in circulation rose by $39.7 billion. The percentage gain was the best since January 2013 when bitcoin was up 54% for the month.

Industry experts said a number of factors including the coronavirus and a return to work after the Lunar New Year holidays in Asia helped prop up bitcoin's price.

The coronavirus, which originated from Wuhan, China, has spread to other areas of the world. More than 360 people have died in China from the virus. Some airlines have ceased flights to China, companies have halted operations for longer than usual over the holiday period and fears are growing that global growth could suffer.

Nigel Green, CEO of deVere Group, a financial services and advisory firm, called bitcoin a "safe-haven asset in times of uncertainty" and said that is why it's seen a boost in the past month.

"The ongoing upward trajectory of the price of bitcoin correlates to the spread of the coronavirus," Green said in a note on Monday. "The more individual cases that are identified, the more countries around the world that are affected, and the greater the impact on traditional financial markets, the higher the price of bitcoin has jumped."

Meanwhile, trade is picking up following the Lunar New Year celebrations which are observed across a number of Asian countries. Some markets have had extra days off but many people returned to work last week.

"Post CNY (Chinese new year) also I think (played) a big role. Lots of money sitting on the sidelines with the long weekend and last week. We saw this in our Malaysia volumes as well on the weekend, lots of fresh money coming in post the CNY break," Vijay Ayyar, head of business development at cryptocurrency exchange Luno, told CNBC.

Aside from the coronavirus-related issues, traders are also looking toward developments on the technical aspect of bitcoin. An event that has been dubbed the "halvening" is happening in May and it relates to bitcoin's underlying technology blockchain.

Miners with specialist computers compete to solve complex math problems to validate bitcoin transactions. Whoever wins that race gets rewarded in bitcoin.

Currently, miners are rewarded 12.5 bitcoin per block mined. The rewards are halved every few years and that rule is written into bitcoin's underlying code. By May 2020, the reward per miner will be cut in half again, to 6.25 new bitcoin, essentially reducing the supply of the cryptocurrency coming onto the market.

Previous halving events have preceded big price increases in bitcoin.

"The bitcoin halvening as well as the recent surge fueled by pandemic fears and public market jitters is yet another reminder that bitcoin is much less risky and offers potentially outsized returns," Jehan Chu, co-founder of blockchain-focused venture firm Kenetic Capital, told CNBC.

He added that bitcoin "is poised for a breakout run to $15,000 by mid-2020."

Follow this link:
Bitcoin logs best January performance in 7 years as value surges by nearly $40 billion - CNBC

Read More..

How the Long Tail of the Coronavirus Might Slow Bitcoin’s Hash Power Growth – Coindesk

The coronavirus outbreak in China may impose a longer-term impact on the bitcoin networks mining activity at a time when an estimated 65 percent of its computing power is located there.

While Chinese miner manufacturers see rising demand for new equipment ahead of bitcoins scheduled halving in May, they estimate the disease may limit growth in bitcoin mining power if the situation isnt resolved in the near future because it is difficult to expand or build new machines, according to Kevin Shao, general manager of Canaan Creative's blockchain arm.

Shao told CoinDesk that while there is little doubt miners can maintain the current level of computing power, there is a shortage of new mining machines.

So far, almost every bitcoin miner maker in China Bitmain, Canaan, MicroBT and InnoSilicon faces delays in production and delivery. Bitmain and Canaan, the worlds top two miner makers by market share, have published notices saying the delay of after-sale services until Feb. 10.

Customers want new, top-of-the-line mining models to expand existing mining facilities and replace older machines in anticipation of the bitcoin halving, currently expected to occur sometime in May 2020.

One of the most affected businesses is our mining machine production, Abe Yang, chief operating officer at PandaMiner, told CoinDesk.

Founded in 2013, the Shenzhen-based firm makes mining machines and provides computing power services with nine mining farms.

Not only us, most miner makers have been affected by the outbreak since their factories are based in cities like Dongguan and Shenzhen in Guangdong province, Yang said. During the extended vacation until Feb.10, almost all the production will be halted.

Meanwhile, the lockdown of the city of Wuhan has had a more direct impact on InnoSilicon, whose headquarters is located in the outbreaks epicenter.

The delay currently has not affected our businesses that much since the extension [of the holiday break] will only be several days, Shao said. However, the impact could be much more significant if the outbreak continues for a longer period of time.

According to data from BTC.com, bitcoins mining difficulty a measure of how hard it is to compete for mining rewards on the bitcoin network posted 6.57 percent and 7.08 percent growth on Jan. 2 and Jan. 15, respectively.

The growth rate dropped to 4.67 percent on Jan. 28 and is estimated to decline to 3 percent in about three days. Bitcoins mining difficulty adjusts itself about every 14 days it goes up or down in positive correlation to whether there are more or less participants racing on the network.

The coronavirus outbreak timespan overlaps with bitcoins halving event. The dual factors are apparently affecting the maintenance of mining equipment as well as the delivery of new miners, Wang Xin, marketing director of WhatsMiner maker MicroBT said in an interview. As such, the recovery of bitcoins hash rate growth will be delayed.

Rising demand

Hash power has more than doubled from around 50 EH/s compared to the same period of last year as bitcoins market price climbed over $9,000, according to Shao.

Second-hand miners [mostly older models like Bitmains AntMiner S9] that are aiming at a faster payback period, now have a larger risk as they enter a shutdown period ahead of the halving, compared to more powerful new models [like WhatsMiner M20 or AntMiner S17], said MicroBTs Wang.

Based on f2pools profitability index, models like the most widely used AntMiner S9 would have a 30 percent gross margin at bitcoins current price with an electricity cost of $0.05 per kWh.

However, a lower number of new miners could be good news for those that have already invested in mining equipment with facilities up and running.

Existing miners could see more steady mining rewards because there wouldnt be more competitors to enter the market due to the lack of new mining machines, Canaans Shao said.

But he added that one way the outbreak would affect existing miners is that many mining machine providers might not be able to offer timely post-sale services to fix malfunctioned devices.

Logistics issues

Wang said assembly factories have delayed their return-to-business schedule, citing the Chinese government's extension of the Lunar New Year. Businesses in the country have been ordered shut until at least Feb. 10.

This is not a crypto-specific issue either. Reuters reported Monday iPhone sales may take a hit because of the coronavirus, if the health emergency can not be contained in the near future.

Shao said one of his companys concerns is slowing logistics, adding, while we can make all the plans to prepare for the outbreak on our part, logistics is something we cant control.

Local infrastructure now prioritizes distributing necessities and supplies to those who are affected by the virus over less important deliveries, Shao said.

Therefore, some of the customers who pre-ordered miners might not be able to receive the machines on time, and it will take longer to deliver new orders if the outbreak continues, Shao said.

Even if employees all return to work, they cannot assemble miners unless their suppliers provide the necessary parts.

If the supplies can not be delivered on time, miner makers are not going to be able to assemble the production, Shao said.

One way companies can take advantage of their inventory is to run the machines themselves to offer computing power to their clients without selling the actual machines, Yang said. This assumes they have the necessary parts to complete assembling miners.

However, the service is not sustainable if the outbreak continues because we would eventually reach full capacity without new machines, creating a shortage in computing power, Yang said.

Mining farms

Mining farms remain unaffected for the moment, but existing quarantine controls and the possibility of an extended outbreak may soon take a toll.

Yang said PandaMiner is able to maintain operations for its existing farms, but there will be significant delays in constructing new farms.

Two-thirds of the companys employees did not go home for the Chinese New Year, and have instead been working at the mining sites. However, for those who did go home it will take weeks to return to work, Yang said.

Many cities now require a two-week quarantine for people coming back from other areas before letting them go back to work, he said.

For example, the Xinjiang autonomous region, an area that hosts a significant portion of mining farms due to its cheap electricity, has implemented strict policies to quarantine not only those coming back from the Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, but also any other province or region, Yang said.

We asked our employees to come back to Xinjiang as early as possible so that they can start the two-week quarantine and go back to work, Yang said, noting policies may vary among different areas in China.

The companys mining farm in Guizhou is subject to a stricter policy. We are allowed to let our employees work on site and can only keep a few people to maintain the operation, he said.

Sichuan province, which controls over 50 percent of bitcoins hashrate, also requires the two-week quarantine, according to Yang.

The lack of on-site staff has already negatively impacted the management of mining farms, Yang said.

Employees are responsible for ensuring mining machines are connected to the Internet and have a consistent supply of power. The employees would also need to fix broken circuit boards and other hardware to maintain operations, Yang said.

We usually have at least 10 people on staff to maintain a mining farm, Yang said. With much fewer employees, it is hard for us to keep as many machines running as before.

According to Yang, in some extreme cases where the local government prohibits all employees from working on site, companies need to negotiate with the government to leave two or three people on duty.

Wolfie Zhao contributed reporting.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

See the rest here:
How the Long Tail of the Coronavirus Might Slow Bitcoin's Hash Power Growth - Coindesk

Read More..

Bitcoin Explodes as Rare Bull Signal Flashes For the First Time in 10 Months – newsBTC

Bitcoin was trending higher through the early European session on Thursday as a very rare bull signal flashed for the first time in 10 months.

Dubbed asIchimoku Cloud, the technical indicator turned green to identify a long-term upside trend shortly after bitcoin surged towards $9,769.70 on Wednesday. It also hinted at the imminent formation of a Golden Cross a popular candlestick pattern that predicts an upcoming bull market.

History of Ichimoku Cloud rollovers | Source: TradingShot

Analysts at trading signals provider TradingShot called out Ichimoku Cloud for its historical accuracy in the past three years. They noted that the indicator correctly determined trend directions. On October 11, 2019, for instance, the Ichimoku Cloud turned red that soon followed the formation of a Death Cross the opposite of Golden Cross.

Bitcoin fell by circa 25 percent shortly after the bearish signal.

Similarly, when the Ichimoku Cloud rolled over to green on April 20, 2019, bitcoin soon established a Golden Cross on its daily charts. The cryptocurrency later swelled by circa 170 percent to mark its year-to-date high towards $13,868.44. TradingShot explained:

As you can see on the chart, after every bearish Ichimoku roll-over, a Death Cross follows shortly after. Respectively after every bullish Ichimoku roll-over, a Golden Cross follows. Since the new Ichimoku Bullish roll-over just took place, a new Golden Cross in pending (see on the chart how the MA50 and MA200 have already started to converge).

The prediction came in tandem with similar bullish expectations all across the bitcoin market. Experts, including billionaire investor Michael Novogratz, the CEO of Galaxy Investment Partners, said the cryptocurrency is eyeing a bull run towards or above $10,000 in the coming sessions.

TradingView.coms top analyst Jacob Canfield also noted that bitcoin is trending upwards in an Ascending Channel and there seem to be no breakdowns in views as of late.

Bitcoin was looking modest during the Thursdays trading session, trading above $9,650 while holding a major portion of the gains it registered yesterday.

BTC/USD testing Rising Wedge resistance | Source: TradingView.com, Coinbase

But the cryptocurrency remained locked inside a bearish continuation range defined by the redded Rising Wedge. The channels resistance clearly capped bitcoins upside attempts that raised the possibility of a deep pullback towards the support (or towards the blued 200-DMA wave).

Moving forward, a bull run continuation could see bitcoin invalidate the Rising Wedge pattern altogether. That would also lead the cryptocurrency towards $10,000 a psychological resistance.

Conversely, a pullback would strengthen the possibility of a breakdown below the Rising Wedge formation, with a downside target towards the blacked 50-DMA wave.

More here:
Bitcoin Explodes as Rare Bull Signal Flashes For the First Time in 10 Months - newsBTC

Read More..

Meet the KFC Worker Who Ran a Bitcoin Drug Empire From His Attic – Bitcoinist

A British KFC worker has been sentenced to 8 years in prison for running a million pound drug operation from his house in Leicestershire. Drugs, 1.8 million cash and over 300,000 in Bitcoin were seized by local police.

In 2017 police executed a search warrant on Paul Johnsons home, where they found large quantities of several class A and class B drugs including ecstasy, cocaine, ketamine, and cannabis. Johnson had been selling the drugs nationwide via post, according to the local report.

Between August 2016 and November 2017 UK Border Control intercepted 20.8 kilos of packages addressed to Johnson at three delivery addresses he had rented, of which 40 per cent were class A drugs They amounted to a quarter of a kilo of cocaine, 8.1 kilos of ecstasy tablets and powder, three kilos of the horse tranquiliser, Ketamine, and eight shipments of cannabis, each variously weighing between half a kilo and four-and-a-half kilos.

Johnson, his wife Lia, and their young daughter lived in a quiet neighborhood in the English midlands. They gave no indication of the large-scale narcotics operation taking place in the attic of their home.

According to Johnsons attorney, he entered the drug trade in 2015 after having difficulty finding a suitable job and was not part of a larger criminal gang.

Johnson ran his operation on the dark web, and continued long after authorities began to intercept his packages. Police claim that at the time of his arrest he had amassed GBP 1,868,946 as well as Bitcoin worth 314,358, all of which has been seized.

Lia Johnson has received a two year sentence.

Critics of cryptocurrency have long claimed that blockchain assets, notably Bitcoin, are primarily used by criminals such as Johnson. Bitcoin first gained this reputation in 2014, when U.S. authorities shut down the Silk Road, a large crypto-based online marketplace that featured drugs as well as many other illegal products. Silk Roads operator, Ross Ulbricht, is currently serving a life sentence.

Cryptos association with criminal activity is contentious and complex. Its borderless, anonymous architecture makes it well-suited for illegal transactions. On the other hand, the overwhelming majority of cryptocurrency transactions are legal. Also, criminals have long been able to launder their assets, and there is little to indicate that blockchain technology will change their behavior for the worse.

Aside from drugs, authorities are deeply concerned with the use of blockchain assets to fund terrorist and extremist groups. For example, a man in the United States has recently pled guilty to selling illegal guns to neo-Nazis in exchange for Bitcoin.

Also, Israeli researches have linked several Bitcoin wallets to Palestinian extremists.

Whereas blockchain assets clearly represent a challenge for law enforcement, they are also a remarkable tool that promise to radically improve the lives of millions across the globe.

Do you think Bitcoin plays a key role in fuelling drug crime? Add your thoughts below!

Images via Shutterstock, Leicester Mercury

Original post:
Meet the KFC Worker Who Ran a Bitcoin Drug Empire From His Attic - Bitcoinist

Read More..

‘Stale’ Block Reminds the Importance of Bitcoin Confirmations – Cryptonews

Source: iStock/simarik

Bitcoin is stale. Early champions such as Jon McAffee have been describing the original cryptocurrency as the "true Shitcoin," while to make matters worse, it also recently witnessed the creation of another 'stale' block.

But why is a stale block a problem? Well, for those who don't know, a block is 'stale' when it's accepted onto the Bitcoin blockchain, but then cast off soon after, because the nodes that had added it to their versions of the chain ended up forking away to a longer, majority chain that doesn't include it.

For some, the fact that a 'stale' block can be cast off proves that Bitcoin isn't actually immutable. And given that the recent stale block detected by BitMex resulted in a double spend worth USD 3, critics also claim it proves that Bitcoin isn't a viable digital monetary system.

However, Bitcoin developers argue that Bitcoin is immutable, insofar as 'immutability' was ever really achievable in the first place. They also point out that double spends are practically impossible on Bitcoin, since most exchanges and payment processors tend to wait for multiple confirmations on the blockchain before confirming a transaction request.

On January 27, BitMex Research tweeted that it had detected a stale block on the Bitcoin blockchain.

As developer Eric Wall explains, this means that two nodes on the chain (perhaps located at opposite corners of the globe) solved the computation for the next valid block at the same time.

"Every Bitcoin node has its own local copy of the blockchain. So does every miner," he tells Cryptonews.com. "When two blocks are found by two different miners at the same time, they're sent across the planet. For a brief moment, ten minutes or so, there can be disagreement in the network about which block was actually found first."

Watch the latest reports by Block TV.

Wall adds that some nodes in the network will favor one of the competing blocks, while other nodes will favor the other.

"This situation usually resolves itself with the next block that's found, which means that the nodes that accepted a block that didn't end up getting continued on by the next winning miner will have to throw their last block out. This block is thus 'stale'."

As for why some nodes might decide to 'orphan' a block, Bitcoin developer Ben Woosley explains that it's because nodes tend to favor the 'majority' chain that's the product of the most computational work.

"It's essentially discarded in favor of the chain that continues to have more blocks mined onto it (the 'most work' chain)," he tells Cryptonews.com. "In Bitcoin, the valid chain is always the 'most work' chain, and as each block is mined, it effectively 'buries' the prior blocks under its work."

So far, so ordinary. However, some observers used the creation and discarding of a stale block to claim that Bitcoin isn't really immutable. John Adler a self-professed "Blockchain skeptic" and a co-founder of the Ethereum-based Fuel Labs was one of these, essentially arguing on Twitter that immutability has to be absolute, otherwise it's not immutability.

However, Bitcoin developers argue that this is a naive view of immutability. Such immutability has never existed and never will exist, and not only for Bitcoin but for other cryptocurrencies.

"Bitcoin's claim of immutability is that an increasing number of confirmations makes it exponentially harder to reverse a transaction," says Bitcoin Core developer Bryan Bishop. "At some point, this becomes so exponentially difficult as to be impossible. That point isn't when the block is buried by one block, but rather by many."

Other developers second this view of immutability. Woosley notes that 'immutability' should be understood in terms of probability, and in particular in terms of increasingly low probabilities.

"Mathematically speaking, there aren't any immutability guarantees in Bitcoin, just exponentially decreasing probability of blocks being dropped out of the blockchain as new blocks are found," he says.

Under normal network conditions (i.e. if a chain isn't being attacked), a block is extremely improbable to drop out of the chain after just a few blocks, Woosley adds. "After a dozen blocks, the probability becomes so low that it's more likely that your head spontaneously explodes."

As developer Nicolas Dorier explains, "Technically speaking you can't speak of finality. Practically speaking you do."

So, "practically speaking," how many confirmations on the chain are sufficient to provide 'immutability' for all intents and purposes? Well, given that immutability is really about probability, there's no hard answer to this question, although there seems to be general agreement that the number is anything between two and six.

"Exchanges traditionally wait 6 confirmations," Dorier says. "If I were an exchange I would accept 2 confirmations (for Bitcoin)."

Wall conveys a similar picture, noting that the risks of one-block confirmations are already common knowledge."Some exchanges require 2, 3 or 6 confirmations because 1-block confirmations are known to not be very reliable," he says.

"Because this blockchain behavior is not unexpected, not many services will release any irretrievable goods or services with just 1 confirmation."

As reported, for an average transaction, only one or two confirmations (in theory, it would take c. 20 minutes) are needed to be requested by the recipient so the double spend strategy wouldnt be profitable, according to calculations by two mathematicians.

Given that most exchanges wait for several confirmations before processing a transaction, it's unlikely that double spending is even an insignificant problem on the Bitcoin blockchain, let alone a serious one.

Read more here:
'Stale' Block Reminds the Importance of Bitcoin Confirmations - Cryptonews

Read More..

Will Genesis upgrade signal the beginning of the Bitcoin financial powerhouse? – ZDNet

The Bitcoin SV network is preparing for a hard fork protocol upgrade on Feb. 4, 2020, which is code-named the Genesis upgrade.

This significant upgrade is planned to include a set of protocol restoration changes that represent an almost complete return to the original Bitcoin protocol documented in the white paper in August 2009

This upgrade will restore the original Bitcoin protocol, keep it stable, and allow it to massively scale by removing the limits that can be set in a block. And its going to completely change the way that Bitcoin is used on the blockchain. The Bitcoin Association believes that Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin.

By removing the limits on a block and enabling scaling up to 2GB per block, Bitcoin SV blockchain will be able to support significantly higher transaction volumes and more transaction fees for miners.

Fees for transactions across the blockchain will change too. For two parties without trust, the fee rate should remain at 1 satoshi/byte until after the Genesis hard fork of the Bitcoin SV network.

After Feb. 4, 2020, blockchain service provider TAAL predicts that there will be a change to the default fee rate to 0.5 satoshis/byte and a change of relay fee to 0.25 satoshis/byte. A satoshi is the smallest divisible unit of a Bitcoin charged per byte of data.

These tiny, insignificant transaction fees are predicted to entice enterprises to utilize the technology. It is far cheaper and more efficient to store data and transactions on the ledger than it is to store it in a data center -- or the cloud.

Due to this upgrade Bitcoin usage is predicted to explode in late February as most network-wide limits are removed from the scripting language and network propagation rules.

There has been a push for several years to remove the limits due to the block subsidy "halving" event that happens in May.

Then, the reward that miners receive will be cut from 12.5 Bitcoin BTC to 6.25. Miners are in this to profit, and without the subsidy, mining BTC is not profitable and could reduce the chances of Bitcoin BTC success.

However, all are not happy with Bitcoin SV Genesis upgrade plans. Miners of other Bitcoin protocols, such as Bitcoin BTC, seem to feel threatened by Craig Wright, who I think is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin.

Bitcoin BTC has completely changed, mainly due to the software soft fork Segwit (Segregated Witness), implemented on Bitcoin BTC in August 2017.

Anonymous tweeter and supporter of Bitcoin SV @Street5Wall reckons that these changes have fundamentally changed BTC -- so much that it is no longer considered Bitcoin anymore.

Many other changes were made to the original Bitcoin protocol that essentially made BTC unusable except as a "collectible," which is totally not what its creator Satoshi had in mind.

The Genesis upgrade to Bitcoin BSV completely restores the Bitcoin protocol to its original version on Feb. 4, 2020, and removes all block size caps (currently at 2GB on BSV compared to 1MB on BTC).

BTC is only capable of seven transactions per second compared to 140,000 transactions/sec on BSV. Genesis will increase that number dramatically. BSV can already handle more transactions/sec than credit card company Visa.

Bitcoin BTC transaction fees are already high. In 2017 there was a "bubble" where some transactions were costing upwards of $50. Because of the small block limit -- 1MB -- for transactions, the queue became longer and made transactions significantly longer to confirm.

Bitcoin BTC could probably suffer as a result of the Genesis upgrade -- perhaps as early as May 2020, as the block reward for mining reduces from 12.5 to 6.25 BTC per block.

Being able to scale is really important. The BTC limitation of 1MB blocks was always designed to be a temporary limit.

If the lost revenue can not be recovered with transaction fees, then miners will go away and BTC will suffer. By removing the limits, as Satoshi intended,

Bitcoin can be used freely by businesses and people. More transaction capacity equals more fees, even if those fees are only 1/3 of a cent.

As mentioned in the original white paper, Bitcoin was intended to be scalable from day one without side chains forming such as the 'Lightning Network' and others.

The upcoming Genesis upgrade on Bitcoin SV will remove these limits as originally intended by the designer of the original blockchain protocol and return Bitcoin to its original scalable state.

The problem with the Lightning Network is that it removes the economic incentive for miners to transact across the network as miners feel that revenue will go to the second layer -- not the miners themselves.

The Lightning Network does not seem to work successfully as it is an anonymous network with no public ledger of transaction recording.

The challenge is that people cannot send Bitcoin BTC. It is too expensive to use.

Perhaps large organizations will begin to announce Bitcoin integration into their business models once the Genesis upgrade has proved itself capable of scale.

Some enterprises could have been waiting for a long time to utilize the technology but have possibly been discouraged due to the high transaction fees and ever-changing protocol.

Enterprises want a locked, stable protocol and fee structure before they commit time and resources to build applications on top of it, instead of then having to constantly change their development process whenever the base protocol changes.

The Blockchain conference taking place in London on Feb. 20 has two well-known -- outside the crypto world -- speakers, which seems to validate Bitcoin SV's credibility and could encourage mainstream investors to stand up and take notice: This could be the beginning for real large scale enterprise adoption taking Bitcoin BSV into uncharted enterprise territory.

The Genesis upgrade could signal a massive change in the way that people use Bitcoin. There could be very exciting times ahead for both Bitcoin miners and users.

2gether unmasks 2020 cryptocurrency users: Who are they?

Companies are gearing up for the explosion in use of cryptocurrencies -- but who are the everyday crypto users?

Will paying to post shape the future of the internet?

What would happen if Twitter or Facebook removed your account, deleted your posts, and silenced your communications? New app Twetch, built for the blockchain, aims to solve that issue.

From cryptocurrency to chocolate, where to spend your Bitcoin

So, you have invested wisely and now have lots of BitcoinSV to spend. But where can you spend your hard-earned cash? Here are some of the wide range of outlets that accept your cryptocurrency for real goods.

Black Friday for owner after $8m in Bitcoin lost to landfill

James Howells wishes he could turn back time after throwing away a hard drive containing a fortune in Bitcoin

See the rest here:
Will Genesis upgrade signal the beginning of the Bitcoin financial powerhouse? - ZDNet

Read More..