Page 3,552«..1020..3,5513,5523,5533,554..3,5603,570..»

Exploring the Quantum Field, From the Suns Core to the Big Bang at MIT – SciTechDaily

Theoretical physicist William Detmold unlocks the mysteries of quarks, gluons, and their strong interactions at the subatomic level.

How do protons fuse to power the sun? What happens to neutrinos inside a collapsing star after a supernova? How did atomic nuclei form from protons and neutrons in the first few minutes after the Big Bang?

Simulating these mysterious processes requires some extremely complex calculations, sophisticated algorithms, and a vast amount of supercomputing power.

Theoretical physicist William Detmold marshals these tools to look into the quantum realm. Improved calculations of these processes enable us to learn about fundamental properties of the universe, he says. Of the visible universe, most mass is made of protons. Understanding the structure of the proton and its properties seems pretty important to me.

Researchers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the worlds largest particle accelerator, investigate those properties by smashing particles together and poring over the subatomic wreckage for clues to what makes up and binds together matter.

Detmold, an associate professor in the Department of Physics and a member of the Center for Theoretical Physics and the Laboratory for Nuclear Science, starts instead from first principles namely, the theory of the Standard Model of particle physics.

With all of us stuck at home or in remote locations, Im not sure that anyone is feeling particularly inspired right now, but this pandemic will eventually end, and sometimes getting lost in the intricacies of Maxwells equations gives a nice break from what is going on in the world, says theoretical physicist William Detmold. Credit: Jared Charney

The Standard Model describes three of the four fundamental forces of particle physics (with the exception of gravity) and all of the known subatomic particles.

The theory has succeeded in predicting the results of experiments time and time again, including, perhaps most famously, the 2011 confirmation by LHC researchers of the existence of the Higgs boson.

A core focus of Detmolds research is on confronting experimental data from experiments such as the LHC. After devising calculations, running them on multiple supercomputers, and sifting through the enormous quantity of statistics they crank out a process that can take from six months to several years Detmold and his team then take all that data and do a lot of analysis to extract key physics quantities for example, the mass of the proton, as a numerical value with an uncertainty range.

My driving concern in this regard is how will this analysis impact experimental results, Detmold says. In some cases, we do these calculations in order to interpret experiments done at the LHC, and ask: Is the Standard Model describing whats going on there?

Detmold has made important advances in solving the complex equations of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), a quantum field theory that describes the strong interactions inside of a proton, between quarks (the smallest known constituent of matter) and gluons (the forces that bind them together).

He has performed some of the first QCD calculations of certain particle decays reactions. They have, for the most part, aligned very closely with results from the LHC.

There are no really stark discrepancies between the Standard Model and LHC results, but there are some interesting tensions, he says. My work has been looking at some of those tensions.

Detmolds interest in quantum physics dates to his schoolboy days, growing up in Adelaide, Australia. I remember reading a bunch of popular science books as a young kid, he recalls, and being very intrigued about quarks, gluons, and other fundamental particles, and wanting to get into the mathematical tools to work with them.

He would go on to earn both his bachelors degree and PhD from the University of Adelaide. As an undergraduate studying mathematics, he encountered a professor who opened his eyes to the mysteries of quantum mechanics. It was probably the most exciting class Ive had. And I get to teach that now.

MIT theoretical physicist William Detmold. Credit: Jared Charney

Hes been teaching that introductory course on quantum mechanics at MIT for a few years now, and he has become adept at spotting those students who are similarly seized by the subject. In every class there are students you can see the enthusiasm dripping off the page as they write their problem sets. Its exciting to interact with them.

While he cant always bring the full complexity of his research into those conversations, he tries to infuse them with the spirit of his enterprise: how to ask the questions that might yield new insights into the deep structures of the universe.

You can frame things in ways to inspire students to go into research and push themselves to learn more, he says. A lot of teaching is about motivating students to go and find out more themselves, not just information transmission. And hopefully I inspire my students the way my professor inspired me.

He adds: With all of us stuck at home or in remote locations, Im not sure that anyone is feeling particularly inspired right now, but this pandemic will eventually end, and sometimes getting lost in the intricacies of Maxwells equations gives a nice break from what is going on in the world.

When he isnt teaching or analyzing supercomputer data, Detmold is often helping to plan better experiments.

The Electron-Ion Collider, a facility planned for construction over the next decade at Brookhaven National Lab on Long Island, aims to advance understanding of the internal structure of the proton. Some of Detmolds calculations are aimed at providing a qualitative picture of the structure of gluons inside the proton, to help the projects designers know what to look for, in terms of orders of magnitude for detecting certain quantities.

We can make predictions for what well be seeing if you design it in a certain way, he says.

Detmold has also become something of an expert at orchestrating complex supercomputing projects. That entails figuring out how to run a huge number of calculations in an efficient way, given the limited availability of supercomputing power and time.

He and his lab members have developed algorithms and software infrastructure to run these calculations on massive supercomputers, some of which have different types of processing units that make data management complicated. Its a research project in its own right, how to perform those calculations in a way thats efficient.

Indeed, Detmold spends time working on how improve methods for getting to the answer. New algorithms, he says, are a key to advancing computation to tackle new problems, calculating nuclear structures and reactions in the context of the Standard Model.

Lets say theres a quantity we want to compute, but with the tools we have at the moment it takes 10,000 years of running a massive supercomputer, he says. Coming up with a new way to calculate something that actually makes it possible to do thats exciting.

But fundamental mysteries are still at the center of Detmolds work. As quarks and gluons get farther apart from each other, the strength of their interactions increases. To understand whats happening in these low-energy states, he has advanced the use of a computational technique known as lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD), which places the quantum fields of the quarks and gluons on a discretized grid of points to represent space-time.

In 2017, Detmold and colleagues made the first-ever LQCD calculations of the rate of proton-proton fusion the process by which two protons fuse together to form a deuteron.

This process kicks off the nuclear reactions that power the sun. Its also exceedingly difficult to study through experiments. If you try to smash together two protons, their electric charges mean they dont want to be near each other, says Detmold.

It shows where this field can go, he says of his teams breakthrough. Its one of the simplest nuclear reactions, but it opens the doorway to saying we can address these directly from the Standard Model. Were trying to build upon this work and calculate related reactions.

Another recent project involved using LQCD to study the formation of nuclei in the universe its earliest moments. As well as looking at these processes for the actual universe, hes performed computations that change certain parameters the masses of quarks and how strongly they interact in order to predict how the reactions of Big Bang nucleosynthesis might have happened and how much they might have affected the evolution of the universe.

These calculations can tell you how likely it is to end up producing universes like the one we see, Detmold says.

Link:

Exploring the Quantum Field, From the Suns Core to the Big Bang at MIT - SciTechDaily

Read More..

10 of the best non-fiction science books to read right now – New Scientist

By Simon Ings

by Lee Smolin

Allen Lane

It is easy to state the basic problem of quantum mechanics as a theory of reality, wrote Lee Smolinin an essay last year for New Scientist: it doesnt tell us what is happening in reality.

Advertisement

Like the small boy in Hans Christian Andersons fairy tale, Lee Smolin, a theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Canada, delights in pointing out that the emperors of contemporary quantum physics wear surprisingly few intellectual clothes. Their theories are messy. No findings could possibly falsify them. And they dont even explain observable reality. Smolin declared war on string theorists, in particular, in 2006 with The Trouble With Physics, and theres rigor, as well as sincerity, to his ongoing critique. Theory should offer a reasonable explanation of how the world works, not replace it with a solipsistic mathematical theory, however ornate. In falling in love with our mathematics, we have come adrift from the real.

Einstein hated quantum theory. So did Louis de Broglie, who first predicted the wave-like aspects of matter. So did Erwin Schrdinger, whose collapsing wave functions gifted us that notorious undead cat metaphor. Roger Penrose and Gerard t Hooft cant stand it. It satisfies no one but who will cast the first stone? Critics say Smolin is tilting at windmills. Champions say hes got quantum itself on the run.

by Jennifer Doudna and Samuel Sternberg

The Bodley Head

I began to feel a bit like Doctor Frankenstein, writes Jennifer Doudna, in a book that our reviewer Adam Rutherford likened to James Watsons classic DNA discovery story The Double Helix. Had I created a monster?

With three years hindsight, we can safely say that monster doesnt even begin to describe the scale and enormity of Doudnas scientific achievement. She was the scientist who directed and led the effort to harness the genome-editing systems that occur naturally in bacteria.

If that doesnt mean much, perhaps the acronym will: CRISPR allows us to cut and paste genetic information. Identifying a gene, working out what it did and then modifying it to do something else, or do something better, was a miraculous enough ability, acquired a bit over a decade ago, and it kept researchers and ethicists awake wondering what the consequences of this work would be for humanity and the planet. Back then, though, the whole process could take months, even years. With CRISPR, we can perform the same process in days.

Doudna and her colleague Samuel Sternberg write very well about the hard graft of research, and capture the thrill of discovery. Best of all, though, they never take their eyes off the main prize: explaining how we can use CRISPR for good to tackle disease, for example, and manage the genie that they and others have released.

by Stuart Kauffman

Oxford University Press

Stuart Kauffman is a polymath. Originally a medical graduate, he is also trained in biochemistry, genetics, physics and philosophy, a recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship and a Wiener Medal. And he can write. In this extraordinary, and extraordinarily readable re-evaluation of his lifes work, Kaufmann explains how life arises: how molecular machines can organise into bounded systems that construct and assemble their own working parts. Evolving by natural selection, these protocells then create new niches into which further novel creatures can emerge. The diversity we see is self-constructing, self-propagating and its development is impossible to predict.

Kaufmann avoids empty philosophising. But the implications of his work are daunting. In a universe containing an estimated 100 billion solar systems, evolving life could be everywhere. Amid such ceaseless creativity, says Kaufmann, we cannot predict how the universe will evolve. Physics is insufficient to guide us through a biological universe. He argues that biology is a weak tool, barely able to comprehend the evolutionary journey of single species on a single planet. Something more, something new an entirely new science of systems may yet be awaiting discovery.

by Anne Harrington

W. W. Norton & Company

Unlike other doctors, psychiatrists cannot peer into a microscope and see the biological cause of the illnesses they treat. Theyre stuck in the premodern era, using the outward manifestations of a disease to devise diagnoses and treatments, rather in the way doctors used to treat vague diseases like ague and dropsy with bloodletting and mustard plasters.

In Mind Fixers, historian of neuroscience Anne Harrington explains what happened when ambitious 20th-century scientists, frustrated by their primitive discipline, started to claim too much for their work. Early in the 20th century, psychiatry threw off the woolly, patient-centered approaches of psychotherapy. Researchers fully expected that scientific study would reveal the true, biological causes of mental suffering. But it didnt happen.

Some people do respond well to the one-size-fits-all pharmacological and surgical procedures modern psychiatry has developed. In every case, though, the treatment comes first, often by accident, and explanations for its efficacy are either specious or absent.

The history of psychiatry is no catalogue of heroic discovery. It is the cautionary tale of what happens when the world doesnt unpack the way our sense of reason expects it to. The brain is the most complex object we know of in the universe. Psychiatrists chipping away at it with their little picks of objective study are not at all misguided, but, says Harrington, in this often shocking but admirably fair and level-headed history, they cannot expect instant results.

University of Chicago Press

by Lee Alan Dugatkin and Lyudmila Trut

University of Chicago Press

Do you like charming memoirs about peoples relationships with endearing animals? Do you like expansive, dramatic accounts of evolution in action? Do you like hard-nosed, laboratory-based studies of animal development? Then youll love this book, which contrives to combine all three approaches in its account of some groundbreaking studies in animal domestication, begun in the Soviet Union by co-author Lyudmila Trut and her boss Dmitri Belyaev in 1959.

In those days, genetics was labelled a fascist pseudoscience; its study could cost you your job, and even get you internally exiled. But Belyaev, under the noses of the authorities, embarked on a lifelong programme to understand the evolutionary relationship between friendliness, intelligence and physical signs of domestication like curly tails. The natural evolution of dogs from wolves took around 15,000 years, but it took Belyaev and Trut less than a decade to breed puppy-like tame foxes with floppy ears, piebald spots and curly tails.

To date, 56 generations of such foxes have been bred. It is even possible to adopt a tame fox theyre expensive, though the money is used to sustain the research project.

Generation by generation, they are helping us understand the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms behind domestication. It seems that most domestic animals have prolonged infancies, and that this developmental quirk leads to changes in hormones and behaviour.

Trut, in collaboration with Lee Alan Dugatkin, a US evolutionary biologist, captures both the charm of her lifes work and the brutality of all those Siberian winters in a book full of delights both intellectual and human.

by Shoshana Zuboff

PublicAffairs

In 1988 Shoshana Zuboff, a professor at Harvard Business School, published In the Age of the Smart Machine, a study of the impact of computerisation on organisations that gave us a glimpse, as her subtitle would have it, on the future of work and power.

Just over three decades later, she returns with a bigger (660 page), more precise and indeed much more frightening case for how our commercial systems have exploited that technology to create an entirely new and unfamiliar (and indeed, deliberately hidden) form of capitalism one that (in common with any power grab left unchecked by civic discourse or law-making) is robbing us of our freedom.

Surveillance capitalism, Zuboff explains, works by providing free services that we all cheerfully use and depend upon. These services monitor our behaviours and feed that data through algorithms to make prediction products that anticipate what you will do now, soon and later. This has monetary value since many companies are willing to lay bets on our future behaviour.

Westerners tut at Chinas Social Credit System, which acts as an artificially intelligent judge and jury over a constantly monitored population, but the commercial logics of Google, Experian, Facebook and the rest are hardly different, and the political cultures of democracy and one-party dictatorship are rapidly becoming indistinguishable.

The Age of Surveillance Capitalism is a crash course in the kinds of conversations we should have been having 20 years ago.

by Frans De Waal

W. W. Norton & Company

In April 2016, the biologist Jan van Hooff visited the Royal Burgers Zoo in Arnhem, the Netherlands, to say goodbye to Mama, a chimpanzee matriarch he had met and befriended 40 years before. Mama, now 58, was dying, and hardly able to move. But she recognised van Hoof, now 79, and at the sight of her old friend, she grinned from ear to ear and hauled herself up for a hug.

That hug, and the rest of that tearful, happy encounter, has been watched more than 10 million times on YouTube.

Humans arent the only species with the capacity for emotion. Considering how much animals act like us, share our physiological reactions, have the same facial expressions, and possess the same sort of brains, De Waal writes in Mamas Last Hug, wouldnt it be strange indeed if their internal experiences were radically different?

Mamas story and others like it from dogs adopting the injuries of their companions to rats helping fellow rats in distress will convince the reader that instead of tiptoeing around the emotions, its time for us to squarely face the degree to which all animals are driven by them.

by Jo Dunkley

Pelican

If youre new to astronomy, or simply want one slim, straightforward book to tell you how the cosmos works, then Jo Dunkley, a professor of physics and astrophysical sciences at Princeton University, has written the book for you. In her day job, Dunkley unpicks the origin and evolution of the universe. Here, she proves herself as adept at communication as she is at research, providing the sort of no-nonsense, cleanly written, non-technical account of whats out there beyond Earth, and why it behaves the way it does, that Patrick Moore provided for an earlier generation.

And it turns out the cosmos is far wilder than Moore and his peers could possibly have imagined. Did you know, for instance, that each of the multiple images of a distant object produced by gravitational lensing captures the object at a different moment in time? Or that we have two methods of measuring the rate that space is growing, and the age of the universe and that they dont agree? Dunkleys account is full of delightful details, wrinkles and unsolved mysteries. This book is a good start, for a reader new to astronomy, and for a researcher who could well become the public face of her discipline in the coming years.

Columbia University Press

by Donald Prothero

Columbia University Press

Books organised as a series of numbered vignettes are a dime-a-dozen these days, but now and again an author comes along who uses the format to bring their field to life as never before. Each of Donald Protheros 25 fossils is a complex puzzle, unfolding over generations, as palaeontologists repeatedly assembled, took apart and reassembled the fiendishly complex four-dimensional puzzle of dinosaur evolution.

How are scattered bones assembled to make a creature no one has seen before? How are dinosaurs of different ages recognised as belonging to one species? How do we know what dinosaurs looked like anyway, when the soft parts vanish during fossilisation? Why was the idea that birds are descended from dinosaurs so controversial for so long?

On the way, well learn why the brontosaurus never actually existed, and how the triceratopss three horns refused, for the longest time, to fit correctly on its head. From the desk of a seasoned and much celebrated California-based palaeontologist, this a story of imagination, rivalry, mistake and often not-so-quiet genius. Historical greats loom large. Theres Richard Owen brilliant, indefatigable, vain, arrogant, envious and vindictive and William Buckland, a notorious eccentric whose ambition was to plate up and eat every living thing. And as Prothero reveals, the field today is full of wonder and novelty, and hardly less colourful.

by Gaia Vince

Basic Books

The former news editor of Nature marshals the evidence of recent decades (genetic, anthropological, palaeontological, archaeological the list is long) to reveal whats special about the human species. Readers of Richard Wrangham (Catching Fire, 2009), mid-period Richard Dawkins (Climbing Mount Improbable, 1996), Sue Savage-Rumbaugh (Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind, 1994) or, indeed, any of the popular volumes that have spoken to our place in the living world over the past 20 years, will have no trouble recognising where the riffs in Vinces medley hail from. But there is entertainment, and insight, in the synthesis she provides.

The qualities we once thought made us unique grammar, altruism, fire-starting, tool use, warfare, the pursuit of beauty, emotion itself are shared by many other species, who hone them to their own needs. Still, there must be some reason why those qualities, in combination, have given rise to contemporary Homo sapiens, a species that exploits 40 per cent of the planets total primary production.

In Vinces explanation, cooking and storytelling dominate. She is far too smart to be triumphalist: from far enough away, what human civilisation most resembles is a slime mould, in which single cells coalesce for group action, protecting the centre while exposing those on the margin to harm.

But why adopt so cold a perspective? Vince would rather we delighted in being ourselves, on a busy and various planet, and, for all our oddness, not so lonely after all.

More on these topics:

See the original post here:

10 of the best non-fiction science books to read right now - New Scientist

Read More..

Letter reveals the quirky side of Albert Einstein – Chile News | Breaking News, Views, Analysis – The Santiago Times

German-Swiss-American mathematical physicist Albert Einstein (1879- 1955).By Hanan Greenwood

A letter up for auction in Israel shows a lighter side to world-renowned theoretical physicist Albert Einstein, who developed the theory of relativity, one of the two pillars of modern physics alongside quantum mechanics.

Letters from Einsteins estate are usually sold for hefty sums of money. The most recent offering, on the block at Winners Auctions, a Jerusalem-based agency specializing in manuscripts, ancient Hebrew books, historic documents, rare maps, and more, shows the quirkier side of the famous scientist, and jokes about the many attempts to interview him.

Einstein was famously some would say infamously averse to giving interviews.

According to the auction house, the letter was written to the chairman of the Association of Orthodox Jewish Scientists Dr. Elmer L. Offenbacher in 1953.

Offenbacher planned to write an article about Einsteins connection to Judaism, He sought to interview Einstein for the article, but the latter was not excited about the idea and wrote in response:

Dear Mr. Offenbacher, I thank you for your letter. I should say, May the Jewish devil get you if there were such a one. But seriously I am not able to fulfill your wish because, in principle, I never assist in something which would lead to the publication of things about my own person.

It is embarrassing enough for me that such nonsense has attached itself to my person.

You will certainly understand, if you make a little effort to put yourself in my situation, Einstein concluded his response.

Offenbacher eventually published the article in 1955, in Jewish Life.

See the original post here:

Letter reveals the quirky side of Albert Einstein - Chile News | Breaking News, Views, Analysis - The Santiago Times

Read More..

Louis Broglie and the Idea of Wave-Particle Duality – Interesting Engineering

In the early 1900s, a French physicist came up with a new idea to explain the theory of atomic structures. That physicist was a man by the name of Louis de Broglie.

Broglie hypothesized that particles could take on the properties of waves. Broglie's theory turned out to be correct and was confirmed a few years later in one of the most famous light experiments of all time, the double-slit experiment.

By confirming the theory that particles could act as waves simultaneously, physicists had discovered that electron streams act the same way as light.

Electrons, negatively charged electronic particles, can act as both waves and particles. This is known as wave-particle duality.

Wave-particle duality doesn't have a massive impact on electrons as a whole, but it does help physicists understand many of the strange behaviors that electrons present.

The concept of wave-particle duality is one that is central to quantum mechanics. It helps physicists fill in the gap to what can't easily be understood by traditional physics interpretations.

RELATED: SCIENTISTS CONFIRM SUBATOMIC PARTICLE PATTERNS USING LARGE HADRON COLLIDER OPEN DATA

The idea of wave-particle duality dates all the way back to the 1600s when Isaac Newton and Christian Huygens were proposing various theories about the properties of light. Einstein also heavily worked on the concept and of course, Louis de Broglie pioneered the theory in his time.

Today, it's thoroughly established that all objects have natures relating to both waves and particles. However, while this may be the case technically, we can't really observe the effects of this concept unless we look at very small scales, such as atoms.

In 1924, Broglie developed his theory of electron waves, which was the idea that matter might have the properties of waves on the atomic scale, rooted in Einstein's earlier theories. The duality of light was first starting to develop but it was Broglie that took this idea and extended it to all of matter. Broglie pioneered the idea of the duality of matter through wave-particle duality.

With everything having both wave and particle natures, the next thing we need to ponder is how light behaves.

In the spirit of wave-particle duality, light is technically both a particle and a wave. However, light is also not a wave or a particle. Light is conceptually an entirely new complex existence.

Think about it this way. If you hold a cylinder up in the air letting a shadow cast down, you'll be presented with two different shapes. Hold it one way and you'll be presented with a rectangle. Hold it another and you'll be presented with a circle. If you examine the shapes of the shadows individually, you'll be left with technically accurate but wholly incomplete views of the original object. A cylinder is neither a circle nor a rectangle but it's also both. This is in the same manner that light is neither a particle nor a wave but is also technically both.

Thinking a little deeper about the flaw in the shadows' representations of the cylinder, they're incomplete because they're not working in the same dimensions. A cylinder is a 3D object that can't fully be explained by 2-dimensional shadows.

RELATED: 9 AMAZING FACTS ABOUT PARTICLE ACCELERATORS AND HOW THEY WORK THAT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND

When we examine light on a quantum scale, this metaphor rings even truer.

Saying that light is a particle is a condensed representation of what it really is. Saying that light is a wave is an oversimplified explanation of what light is.

When we observe light, we see this complex and confusing duality play out.

Light is like waves in that it can be diffracted, refracted, reflected, and interfered with.

As De Broglie was working to flesh out his theory of particle-wave duality, he leaned heavily on Einstein's theory of the photoelectric effect. This theory encompasses the emission of electrons from an object when hit with types of electromagnetic radiation, like light.

Light can be observed as a particle, known as photons. These particles, when of enough energy, are strong enough to knock electrons from substances.

Electrons also release kinetic energy when they are released from an object. Upon experimentation, though, scientists saw that brighter lights didn't affect the overall kinetic energy of the electrons. This is to say that traditionally, waves with greater intensity have greater energy. Since energy is proportional to amplitude, it would've been expected that the brighter the light shone on an object, the more kinetic energy released by the electrons, however, this is the case.

Scientists discovered that the frequency of lights, rather, is what changes the level of kinetic energy in the equation. This means that certain objects don't emit electrons under certain frequencies, having a threshold known asV0.

RELATED: THIS TINY PARTICLE ACCELERATOR RECYCLES ENERGY WITH TERAHERTZ WAVES

But what does all of this mean? Since the energy of waves and the overall energy of light do not correlate, this means that light is a particle that contains the properties of waves.

All of this can be a little confusing, however, so watching a video with visuals on the topic is likely the next best way to understand what we're discussing.

To further understand the properties of light as a particle and a wave, as well as understand the duality of particles and waves, take a look at this video below depicting the famous double-slit experiment.

Read the rest here:

Louis Broglie and the Idea of Wave-Particle Duality - Interesting Engineering

Read More..

Scientists Discover Quantum Matter for the First Time in Space – Beebom

Nearly a century ago, Indian mathematician, Satyendra Nath Bose, and German theoretical physicist, Albert Einstein predicted the existence of an exotic particle that is responsible for the unending expansion of the universe. This came to be known as the Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). Now, for the first time, astronauts onboard the International Space Station have found the particle out in space, orbiting the earth. And scientists think that this could lead to some major discoveries in the future.

Now, BECs are quite fragile particles and that makes it pretty hard to retain the element for a longer time. This is because they are formed when bosonic atoms (ones that have an equal number of neutrons and protons) are brought down 0 Kelvin (~273.15-degree Celcius).

Once the element is formed, scientists use magnetic traps to confine the element. However, Earths high gravitational pullrestricts the shape of possible magnetic traps in such a way that a deep trap is needed to confine a BEC, according to the report. So, without the appropriate magnetic trap, the BEC interacts with the external world, the temperature rises and as a result, the atom disseminates before scientists could study it. On Earth, this happens in milliseconds.

However, a team of NASA scientists working in the International Space Station (ISS) recently revealed the first results from BEC experiments done in the space station that show unexpected results. According to David Aveline, the leader of the research project, the team found rubidium BECs orbiting the earth. They then used similar magnetic traps to confine the BEC and surprisingly, the element sustained for a whole second before dissipating. This gave the scientists a much longer time to study the matter than they get here on Earth.Image: Nature Journal

According to the scientists, this was possible due to the low-gravitational force (microgravity) in the space station. So, this leads the researchers to believe that microgravity plays a huge role in studying the BECs and this discovery could lead to some monumental breakthrough in quantum physics.

If you are interested to find out more about the subject, then you can read the research paper published by the NASA scientists on Nature journal.

Originally posted here:

Scientists Discover Quantum Matter for the First Time in Space - Beebom

Read More..

Physicists May Have Solved Long-Standing Mystery of Matter and Antimatter – SciTechDaily

An element that could hold the key to the long-standing mystery around why there is much more matter than antimatter in our Universe has been discovered by a University of the West of Scotland (UWS)-led team of physicists.

The UWS and University of Strathclyde academics have discovered, in research published in the journal Nature Physics, that one of the isotopes of the element thorium possesses the most pear-shaped nucleus yet to be discovered. Nuclei similar to thorium-228 may now be able to be used to perform new tests to try find the answer to the mystery surrounding matter and antimatter.

UWSs Dr. David ODonnell, who led the project, said: Our research shows that, with good ideas, world-leading nuclear physics experiments can be performed in university laboratories.

This work augments the experiments which nuclear physicists at UWS are leading at large experimental facilities around the world. Being able to perform experiments like this one provides excellent training for our students. Dr. David ODonnell, UWS project leader

Physics explains that the Universe is composed of fundamental particles such as the electrons which are found in every atom. The Standard Model, the best theory physicists have to describe the sub-atomic properties of all the matter in the Universe, predicts that each fundamental particle can have a similar antiparticle. Collectively the antiparticles, which are almost identical to their matter counterparts except they carry opposite charge, are known as antimatter.

According to the Standard Model, matter and antimatter should have been created in equal quantities at the time of the Big Bang yet our Universe is made almost entirely of matter.

Thorium-228. Credit: Dr. David ODonnell, UWS

In theory, an electric dipole moment (EDM) could allow matter and antimatter to decay at different rates, providing an explanation for the asymmetry in matter and antimatter in our universe.

Pear-shaped nuclei have been proposed as ideal physical systems in which to look for the existence of an EDM in a fundamental particle such as an electron. The pear shape means that the nucleus generates an EDM by having the protons and neutrons distributed non-uniformly throughout the nuclear volume.

The research team was made up of Dr. ODonnell, Dr. Michael Bowry, Dr. Bondili Sreenivasa Nara Singh, Professor Marcus Scheck, Professor John F Smith and Dr. Pietro Spagnoletti from UWSs School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences; and the University of Strathclydes Professor Dino Jaroszynski, and PhD students Majid Chishti and Giorgio Battaglia.

Professor Dino Jaroszynski, Director of the Scottish Centre for the Application of Plasma-based Accelerators (SCAPA) at the University of Strathclyde, said: This collaborative effort, which draws on the expertise of a diverse group of scientists, is an excellent example of how working together can lead to a major breakthrough. It highlights the collaborative spirit within the Scottish physics community fostered by the Scottish University Physics Alliance (SUPA) and lays the groundwork for our collaborative experiments at SCAPA.

The experiments began with a sample of thorium-232, which has a half-life of 14 billion years, meaning it decays very slowly. The decay chain of this nucleus creates excited quantum mechanical states of the nucleus thorium-228. Such states decay within nanoseconds of being created, by emitting gamma rays.

Dr. ODonnell and his team used highly sensitive state-of-the-art scintillator detectors to detect these ultra-rare and fast decays. With careful configuration of detectors and signal-processing electronics, the research team have been able to precisely measure the lifetime of the excited quantum states, with an accuracy of two trillionths of a second. The shorter the lifetime of the quantum state the more pronounced the pear shape of the thorium-228 nucleus giving researchers a better chance of finding an EDM.

Reference: Direct measurement of the intrinsic electric dipole moment in pear-shaped thorium-228 by M. M. R. Chishti, D. ODonnell, G. Battaglia, M. Bowry, D. A. Jaroszynski, B. S. Nara Singh, M. Scheck, P. Spagnoletti and J. F. Smith, 18 May 2020, Nature Physics.DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0899-4

Read more from the original source:

Physicists May Have Solved Long-Standing Mystery of Matter and Antimatter - SciTechDaily

Read More..

Bitcoin-Friendly Top US Banking Regulator Aims to Solve Banks’ Problems With Decentralization | News – Bitcoin News

The new top banking regulator for the Trump administration sees huge and great promise in cryptocurrency. Focusing on decentralized networks, bitcoin, and rewriting existing regulations, he shares his views on cryptocurrency and the creation of the digital dollar.

Brian Brooks recently became the new acting Comptroller of the Currency, the top banking regulator for the Trump administration. The 51-year-old has experience in crypto, having previously served as general counsel to bitcoin exchange Coinbase. Discussing his views on cryptocurrency, regulation, and technology, Brooks told Forbes:

There is huge and great promise in blockchain and crypto.

He elaborated: Blockchain has potential to connect up, in a decentralized network, all kinds of data It has the ability to create large, friction-free, decentralized networks of people. Brooks believes that blockchain is the solution to our problems, Forbes conveyed. Im very bullish on technology Things like AI, things like blockchain have a better ability to leverage the wisdom of crowds, he was quoted as saying.

As acting Comptroller of the Currency, Brooks is the administrator of the federal banking system and chief officer of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC supervises nearly 1,200 national banks, federal savings associations, and federal branches and agencies of foreign banks that conduct approximately 70% of all banking business in the U.S. The Comptroller also serves as a director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

A lawyer by trade, Brooks joined the OCC in March as chief operating officer, appointed by Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin. The former banker was previously executive vice president and general counsel at Fannie Mae. He, Mnuchin, and former Comptroller Joseph Otting worked together at Onewest Bank in Pasadena, California, which was heavily criticized for its foreclosure practices in the years after the financial crisis.

Discussing his views on cryptocurrencies, Brooks told the publication that he is looking for decentralized networks in general he cited bitcoin, ether and XRP in particular to solve many of the problems hindering more than one-thousand financial institutions under his purview, Forbes contributor Cory Johnson detailed.

The new acting comptroller also revealed that he is focusing on rewriting existing regulation on bank digital activities. Citing banks antiquated money transfer methods, he said that it takes three days to transfer money from the U.S. to Europe on the SWIFT network. Not only is peoples money at risk during that time, but they also incur foreign exchange fees, he noted, adding that these problems can be eliminated using digital assets.

Moreover, Brooks sees a threat in other countries modernizing their payment systems, leaving the U.S. lagging behind. Criticizing the Feds version of faster payments, he revealed: There are certain O.C.C. regulations that require that certain things be transmitted by fax and require banks maintain a fax number. Those were written at a time when faxes were a cool technology. Now theyre mandates.

Regarding the digital dollar, Brooks is skeptical about the federal government issuing one. He opined:

Im not in favor of a government-created token I just dont think thats the role of government, quite honestly. But I think that the Fed and the SEC need to be putting up frameworks of what that digital currency needs to be.

Meanwhile, the most crypto-friendly commissioner with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is set to serve another term. Commissioner Hester Peirce, often known in the crypto community as crypto-mom, has been nominated for another term as an SEC commissioner. Her existing term expires this month but commissioners may serve up to 18 months beyond the expiration of their terms. Peirces nomination needs to be confirmed by the Senate.

A strong advocate of the SEC approving bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETF), she introduced the Token Safe Harbor Proposal in February to fill the gap between regulation and decentralization, proposing a grace period of three years for tokens. The commissioner recently said that there is an increasing demand for cryptocurrency, particularly from institutional investors.

What do you think about the U.S. having a crypto-friendly top banking regulator? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, OCC

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer

View post:
Bitcoin-Friendly Top US Banking Regulator Aims to Solve Banks' Problems With Decentralization | News - Bitcoin News

Read More..

Developer Activity Surrounding Eos, Tron, and Bitcoin Cash Plummets – Cointelegraph

A report published by blockchain and AI investment firm Outlier Ventures has found a decline in developer activity of roughly 20% on average across 12 leading blockchain and cryptocurrency projects.

In Outlier Ventures Blockchain Developer Report for the second quarter of 2020, the firm notes that development fell by half for top markets Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Eos (EOS), and Tron Tron (TRX).

Despite the retraction in building, the firm notes that some signs of strong developer activity surrounding various crypto projects, with Theta (THETA) and Cardano (ADA) seeing increases in core code updates of 931% and 580% respectively.

Eos saw the fastest drop in development, with the projects mainnet launch in June year precipitating an 86% fall in building taking place.

Bitcoin Cash saw the second-largest decline in activity, with development falling by 63%. Outlier Ventures attributes much of the drop to the Bitcoin SV (BSV) fork that took place in November 2018.

Tron also saw a heavy retracement in development, with a 53% drop in activity.

Monthly active development on Tron, Eos, and Bitcoin Cash: Outlier Ventures

Cardano, Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Corda all saw activity fall by nearly 20%, while Ripple (XRP), Hyperledger, and Stellar (XLM) also saw development declines year-over-year.

Polkadot and Cosmos (ATOM) were the only projects to exhibit an increase in total development, increasing by 15% and 44% respectively.

The report also measured the number of weekly commits and code updates for the top 30 open-source protocols by market cap, plus Corda and Hyperledger.

Weekly code updates for Eos, Tron, and MakerDAO (MKR) saw huge update decreases of 94%, 96%, and 98% respectively, with VeChain (VET), Stellar, BSV, Neo (NEO), Crypto.com (CRO), Cosmos, IOTA (MIOTA), and Polkadot also posting declines overall.

However, more than 50% of the projects examined saw a significant increase in code updates, including Ethereum Classic (ETC), Chainlink (LINK), and Bitcoin.

Excerpt from:
Developer Activity Surrounding Eos, Tron, and Bitcoin Cash Plummets - Cointelegraph

Read More..

CryptoMixer.bz: Bitcoin Mixer for your anonymity in the Crypto World – Yahoo Finance

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 14, 2020 / The concept of blockchain and thus, Bitcoin, came riding on the advantage of the anonymity of transactions, defiance to authority, lack of centralization and overseer authority among other advantages. Cryptocurrencies became popular because their programmers touted them as anonymous. It has, however, emerged that they are not and that transactions undertaken using altcoins can be traced.

Over time with the increased government scrutiny and unwanted invasion by phishers, users now realize that the cryptocurrency world is not as anonymous as most of them were led to believe.

A tech startup called, CryptoMixer is changing all this and giving back cryptocurrency enthusiasts their security and privacy. The start-up provides a cryptocurrency mixing platform that obscures your cryptocurrency transactions, making it hard for anyone to trace your dealings. CryptoMixer reintroduces anonymity by allowing online shoppers that pay using cryptocurrency through addresses that remain anonymous when the user is completing transactions. The shoppers, as such, cannot be associated with the various addresses they use.

How Does Coin Mixing Work?

Coin mixers work by essentially collecting cryptocurrency from the people using cryptocurrency, mixing it with a giant pile of other cryptocurrencies, and then sending them smaller units of cryptocurrency to an address of their preference, with total the amount that you put in minus 1-3%. The 1-3 % is generally taken as a profit by the coin mixing company. This is how they make money.

A cryptocurrency mixer (also known as a blender) allows you to spend, store and share cryptocurrencies, without your transactional data becoming public. In short, it makes your financial transactions anonymous in the true sense. It is done by mixing your transactional data with a pool of Bitcoin data. This ensures your data is secure, you have control over your privacy, and no data can be traced back to you, as the link between the sender and the receiver is broken.

Crypto Mixer: The crypto mixing solution

CryptoMixer is a unique cryptocurrency mixer/blender that ensures your cryptocurrency becomes untraceable, and no link exists between the stakeholders. They have designed different pools of cryptocurrencies based on their sources, with variable fee percentages. This segmentation and differentiation ensure the clean mixing of the currency. The three pools include Standard Pool, Smart Pool, and Stealth Pool. It uses a 'smart code' to avoid the same currencies from reaching a user on multiple occasions.

Features of Smart Mixer Platform

Zero Post-Transaction Logs - CryptoMixer platform keeps transaction logs for only as long as it needs them. The longest period that these logs can remain is 24 hours, otherwise, the platform keeps them only for as long as is necessary to complete a transaction.

Full Anonymity - The need for complete anonymity is greater in the online space, and it is only second to the information online prowlers seek. Users that mix cryptocurrency on the platform do not even need to input their information. Instead, only the recipient altcoin address is necessary.

Customizable Process - Users can set various parameters as they so choose. You, for instance, can choose the amount of cryptocurrency to mix, the commission to pay for the mixing, and the delay period you prefer.

Story continues

View original post here:
CryptoMixer.bz: Bitcoin Mixer for your anonymity in the Crypto World - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

Facebooks Libra Stablecoin Project, Ethereum (ETH), Near, Bitcoin Cash are Currently Most Active Development Projects: Report – Crowdfund Insider

The controversial Facebook-led Libra project is reportedly the most active project in terms of developer activity, according to CoinCodeCap data.

There are 41 active developers working on Libra, meanwhile, Ethereum (ETH), the worlds largest smart contract platform, has 36 active developers, the data site reveals.

Other active open-source protocols include Near (NEAR), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), CELO, and IOTA even though it recently experienced serious issues including a million dollar hack.

Filecoin (FIL), a highly-anticipated blockchain project that has been aggressively rolling out updates, is the 7th most active project right now in terms of developer activity.

Insolar (XNS), a Swiss enterprise blockchain development firm that counts Microsoft, Oracle and AT Kearney amongst its business partners and clients, has also consistently been in the top 10 in terms of having the most active development.

As confirmed in a separate report by Outlier Ventures, blockchain interoperability project Cosmos (ATOM) has seen many developers contribute to the ongoing development of its protocol.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin (BTC) development has remained steady due to the significant amount of support it receives in terms of grants to developers, and also international support from established organizations like the Human Rights Foundation.

Development for stablecoin Dai, Decred (DCR), Stellar (XLM), Algorand (ALGO), Waves, Lisk (LSK), and Cardano (ADA) has remained fairly steady despite the COVID-19 outbreak and resulting economic uncertainty.

Despite being a fairly new player in the competitive DLT space, Libra has managed to attract 176 active authors in the past year which is a lot more than any other project.

This has all been going on while Facebook had to make significant changes to it development roadmap for Libra, after regulators heavily scrutinized the initiative citing concerns about the social media giants issues related to privacy and many lawmakers being against Big Tech moving into finance.

As reported, Facebooks Libra may serve as signal that Fintech firms like Visa, Paypal, Booking.com have been eager to explore stablecoins, one of the fastest-growing sectors in decentralized finance (DeFi) and the blockchain space, in general.

Lex Sokolin, the Global Fintech Co-Head and CMO at ConsenSys, a leading Ethereum (ETH) development studio based in New York, told CI in recent interview:

I think Libra will be very impactful, no matter what form it takes. If it just takes the form of a payment rail for CBDCs, that already is massively important. The existence of such a regulated blockchain rail, being private and closely regulated, will by definition take market share away from other types of permissionless open blockchain rails.

Original post:
Facebooks Libra Stablecoin Project, Ethereum (ETH), Near, Bitcoin Cash are Currently Most Active Development Projects: Report - Crowdfund Insider

Read More..