Cloud Hosting

Page 3,390«..10 20..3,3893,3903,391 3,392..3,400 3,410..»

Internet of Things Security Market, Share, Growth, Trends And Forecast To 2027: Dataintelo – Scientect

September 12, 2020 | Author: admin

A new research study has been presented by Dataintelo.com offering a comprehensive analysis on the Global Internet of Things Security Market where user can benefit from the complete market research report with all the required useful information about this market. This is a latest report, covering the current COVID-19 impact on the market. The pandemic of Coronavirus (COVID-19) has affected every aspect of life globally. This has brought along several changes in market conditions. The rapidly changing market scenario and initial and future assessment of the impact is covered in the report. The report discusses all major market aspects with expert opinion on current market status along with historic data. This market report is a detailed study on the growth, investment opportunities, market statistics, growing competition analysis, major key players, industry facts, important figures, sales, prices, revenues, gross margins, market shares, business strategies, top regions, demand, and developments.

The Internet of Things Security Market report provides a detailed analysis of the global market size, regional and country-level market size, segment growth, market share, competitive landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, recent developments, opportunity analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, and technological innovations.

Get a Free Sample Copy of the Internet of Things Security Market Report with Latest Industry Trends @ https://dataintelo.com/request-sample/?reportId=90353

Major Players Covered in this Report are: Check Point Security Software TechnologiesCisco SystemsDigicertGEGemaltoHewlett Packard Development CompanyInfineon TechnologiesIntelIBMNSIDE SecurePTCSophosSymantec CorporationTrend MicroTrustwaveVerizon Enterprise Solutions

Global Internet of Things Security Market SegmentationThis market has been divided into Types, Applications, and Regions. The growth of each segment provides an accurate calculation and forecast of sales by Types and Applications, in terms of volume and value for the period between 2020 and 2026. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets. Market share data is available on the global and regional level. Regions covered in the report are North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East & Africa, and Latin America. Research analysts understand the competitive strengths and provide competitive analysis for each competitor separately.

By Types:Cloud SecurityApplication SecurityEndpoint SecurityNetwork Security

By Applications:Smart RetailConnected VehiclesSmart Government and DefenseConnected HealthcareConsumer WearablesConnected LogisticsSmart Energy and UtilitiesSmart Manufacturing

To get Incredible Discounts on this Premium Report, Click Here @ https://dataintelo.com/ask-for-discount/?reportId=90353

Global Internet of Things Security Market Regions and Countries Level AnalysisRegional analysis is a highly comprehensive part of this report. This segmentation sheds light on the sales of the Internet of Things Security on regional- and country-level. This data provides a detailed and accurate country-wise volume analysis and region-wise market size analysis of the global market.

The report offers an in-depth assessment of the growth and other aspects of the market in key countries including the US, Canada, Mexico, Germany, France, the UK, Russia, Italy, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia. The competitive landscape chapter of the global market report provides key information about market players such as company overview, total revenue (financials), market potential, global presence, Internet of Things Security sales and revenue generated, market share, prices, production sites and facilities, products offered, and strategies adopted. This study provides Internet of Things Security sales, revenue, and market share for each player covered in this report for a period between 2016 and 2020.

Make an Inquiry of this Report @ https://dataintelo.com/enquiry-before-buying/?reportId=90353

Why Choose Us:

Table of Contents1. Executive Summary2. Assumptions and Acronyms Used3. Research Methodology4. Market Overview5. Global Market Analysis and Forecast, by Types6. Global Market Analysis and Forecast, by Applications7. Global Market Analysis and Forecast, by Regions8. North America Market Analysis and Forecast9. Latin America Market Analysis and Forecast10. Europe Market Analysis and Forecast11. Asia Pacific Market Analysis and Forecast12. Middle East & Africa Market Analysis and Forecast13. Competition Landscape

About DataIntelo:DATAINTELO has set its benchmark in the market research industry by providing syndicated and customized research report to the clients. The database of the company is updated on a daily basis to prompt the clients with the latest trends and in-depth analysis of the industry. Our pool of database contains various industry verticals that include: IT & Telecom, Food Beverage, Automotive, Healthcare, Chemicals and Energy, Consumer foods, Food and beverages, and many more. Each and every report goes through the proper research methodology, validated from the professionals and analysts to ensure the eminent quality reports.

Contact Info:Name: Alex MathewsAddress: 500 East E Street, Ontario,CA 91764, US.Phone No: US: +1 909 545 6473 | IND: +91-7000061386Email: [emailprotected]Website: https://dataintelo.com

Read the original here:
Internet of Things Security Market, Share, Growth, Trends And Forecast To 2027: Dataintelo - Scientect

Kaspersky: 37% of internet users in SEA think they won’t be targeted by cybercriminals – SoyaCincau.com

September 12, 2020 | Author: admin

The latest research from Kaspersky reveals that 6 out of 10 internet users from Southeast Asia (SEA) are aware of their increased time online than before. However, 38% of users admitted that internet security was not a priority due to life being too busy during the COVID-19 lockdown.

The cybersecurity company surveyed 760 interviewees from around the region last May to find out how users create a digitally safe and secure comfort zone at home. Considering that SEA has many young and highly active internet users, it comes to no surprise that most users in the region spent between 5 to 10 hours online per day.

So what were people doing online with all their spare time during lockdown? It turns out that the five most common online activities include: shopping (64%), content streaming and online gaming (58%) socialising with family and friends (56%), conducting financial matters (47%) and attending online tutorials (39%).

While technology can be a useful tool to keep us all connected together, we need to secure our home networks against malicious threats online, said Kasperskys general manager for Southeast Asia Yeo Siang Tiong.

With all the additional time spent online, what are Southeast Asian internet users most concerned about? Apparently 69% of respondents were worried about conducting financial transactions online while another 62% felt uneasy holding virtual work meetings.

Interestingly, Kasperskys report shows that 42% of respondents were afraid of their financial details being compromised through their devices.

This was followed by another 37% of people concerned about their private documents being accessed by third parties. Aside from that, there were 35% who worry that someone would take control of their device remotely via an insecure internet connection.

Spyware was another worrying point for 3-in-10 online users while another 30% were concerned about organisations or websites tracking their location.

The concerns which weve unmasked in our research proved that there is a growing awareness of the cruel aftermath of cyberattacks. However, this same study showed us that there are still 37% of internet users in the region who think they are not at risk because someone else is more interesting for cybercriminals, said Yeo.

It is high time to think really carefully about the defences we are building around our digital lives and to place its security among our topmost priority, he added.

Kaspersky has several suggestions on how to enforce better security for your devices and home:

Kaspersky is offering a three-month free trial of its Kaspersky Safe Kids solution should you require a tool to help keep your children safe as they surf the web. You can also check out Kasperskys official store on Lazada and Shopee for other internet security solutions.

View original post here:
Kaspersky: 37% of internet users in SEA think they won't be targeted by cybercriminals - SoyaCincau.com

TikTok and WeChat may raise security concerns, but Trump’s knee-jerk reaction isn’t the way to deal with them – NewsChannel 3-12 – KEYT

September 12, 2020 | Author: admin

For years, the Great Firewall of China has blocked some of the largest online services coming out of the United States, including Google, Facebook and Twitter.

This month, Washington indicated that it might be willing to build a wall of its own by threatening a ban on two of the most popular Chinese-owned apps in the world: TikTok and WeChat.

US President Donald Trump has given the apps 45 days to find American buyers, according to a pair of executive orders he issued last week. Trump claimed the apps pose risks to national security, citing concerns about data privacy and censorship.

ByteDances TikTok has already been courted by Microsoft, which would make it possible for the app to avert a total ban albeit at the cost of its Chinese ownership. Tencents WeChat, though, is far less popular in the US than it is at home, and its use stateside could be significantly curtailed. Because Trumps order is vague, some analysts also suspect a ban could have potentially severe knock-on effects for American people and businesses who use the app in China.

Trumps moves risk further fracturing the global internet, upending families and online communities, and disrupting the flow of tech investment and innovation in both countries, without necessarily putting in place a set of policies to ensure popular apps be they from China or the US guarantee the privacy and security of their users.

The solution cant be to undermine the free flow of information that underpins the internet, said Susan Ariel Aaronson, an expert on internet governance at George Washington University. What worries me is that the US is becoming China by trying to block off apps.

The two apps targeted by Trump also pose unique challenges, further muddying the issue.

Tencent has long faced accusations of censorship and surveillance, making WeChat a poster child for the privacy and free speech concerns often expressed about some Chinese apps. But cutting it off entirely from the US would come with its own costs for American and Chinese users.

With TikTok, the privacy issues are murkier, given the app does not appear to behave that differently from its US competitors. Its treatment also raises questions about whether Washington could ever trust a Chinese app of its scale.

But the Trump administration appears to be taking a one-size-fits-all approach to Chinese-owned apps, in a way that risks not only conflating the issues with each, but potentially undermining the administrations own case for the crackdowns in the first place.

WeChat and TikTok are both social media applications with millions of users around the world and owned by Chinese parent companies. But they have different histories and concerns.

TikTok is an app used by teenagers for sharing silly videos, so its inclusion in any conversation about national security may seem bizarre to some observers.

There is no information captured from TikTok that would be useful to Chinese intelligence, said James Lewis, an expert on technology policy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

But Trump has accused the app of capturing vast swaths of information from its users, such as location data and browsing and search histories, which threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans personal and proprietary information potentially allowing China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail, and conduct corporate espionage.

TikTok has denied that it would share data with Beijing, and says US user data isnt stored in China. The app has also broadly pushed back at other allegations, including recent claims published by the Wall Street Journal that it bypassed protections on Android to scrape user data.

On paper, at least, TikTok does not collect significantly more data than rivals such as Facebook and Google, which gather such information for targeting advertising. In fact, it may collect less, given that users are uploading less personal information to the app than they do on other social media platforms.

The extent to which WeChat collects information, meanwhile, has long raised security concerns as has Tencents close relationship to the Chinese Communist Party.

For example, cybersecurity experts in the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala have pointed to the prevalence of WeChat as a potential reason for a drop in hacking attacks on members in recent years.

Because WeChat is so embedded in the community in some ways, I dont think they need to hack systems as much as they used to because that information is already being given to them, Lobsang Gyatso Sither, a Tibetan cybersecurity expert, has previously said.

WeChats owner Tencent has consistently denied spying on users. But in the past, Chinese prosecutors have also cited evidence retrieved from the app, including supposedly deleted messages, in cases against Muslims, dissidents and even Communist Party members. Chinese cybersecurity laws give the government broad powers to request data from companies like Tencent, which may also face political pressure to hand over information in sensitive cases.

Any type of message or content shared onWeChat is very likely underheavy surveillance [by] the Chinesegovernment, said Samm Sacks, a China and cybersecurity expert at New America, a Washington DC-based think tank.

China has been firing back at Washington for targeting the apps.

In a series of tweets Wednesday, Hua Chunying, a top diplomat with Chinas Ministry of Foreign Affairs, accused the US of creating a splinternet and of using gangster logic in trying to force TikTok to sell. She highlighted Washingtons own less-than-stellar record on government surveillance.

And while Beijings stance comes across as somewhat ironic, given its own relationship with many Western firms, Hua isnt alone in such criticisms. Last month, for example, the European Court of Justice ruled against a data-sharing plan between the US and the European Union over concerns that data shared by Europeans might not be adequately protected from US surveillance.

Accusations of hypocrisy do not mean Washington should be blind to the potential threats posed by Chinese apps or any apps when it comes to data security and free speech, but both could be protected without necessarily banning or blocking foreign services.

The question is, how do we make the app system more secure overall? said Sacks. We need to spend more time on legislation and standardswhere you have atrusted set of criteria for all platforms.Sowhetheryoure TikTok or some random weather app, inorder to operate youhave to be audited, approved under these more strict cybersecurity practices.

A similar approach could be taken on the issue of censorship, with standards set for how apps should be expected to protect their users free speech and avoid exposing them to misinformation.

Its time for the US to get its own vision for internet governance, Sacks said. How do you govern massive amounts of data thats collected on these platforms?

Oxford Instruments Partners With The 10 Million Consortium, To Launch The First Commercial Quantum Computer In UK – AZoNano

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

Oxford Instruments NanoScience announced today it will partner with a 10 million consortium to accelerate the commercialisation of quantum computing in the UK, led by Rigetti Computing. The three-year programme will build and operate the first quantum computer in the UK, make it available over the cloud, and pursue practical applications in machine learning, materials simulation, and finance. The consortium is joined by University of Edinburgh, quantum software start-up Phasecraft, and Standard Chartered.

Oxford Instruments is delighted to be part of such a strong consortium and play a key role in the development of a quantum computer by providing the latest state-of-the-art Proteox dilution refrigerator for this prestigious project. The company works closely with customers and partners to develop the next generation superconducting and cryogenic solutions for quantum and nanotechnology applications. For quantum technologies, Oxford Instruments offers a wide range of solutions, both for research and commercial exploitation from the fabrication of qubits to measurement and characterisation, no matter what the customers qubit strategy might be.

Our ambition is to be the worlds first quantum economy, which could provide UK businesses and industries with billions of pounds worth of opportunities. Therefore, I am delighted that companies across the country will have access to our first commercial quantum computer, to be based in Abingdon. This is a key part of our plan to build back better using the latest technology, attract the brightest and best talent to the UK and encourage world-leading companies to invest here.

Science Minister Amanda Solloway

Many industries central to the UK economy are poised to benefit from quantum computing, including finance, energy, and pharmaceuticals. A recent BCG report projected the global quantum industry to reach 4 billion by 2024.

Rigetti will build the superconducting quantum computer in a Proteox dilution refrigerator provided by Oxford Instruments. The University of Edinburgh will develop new ways of testing quantum hardware and verifying the performance of quantum programs, and will work with Standard Chartered Bank to advance quantum machine learning applications for finance. In addition, Phasecraft will use its deep knowledge of quantum algorithms and high-efficiency quantum software to harness this hardware for near-term applications in materials design, energy, and pharmaceuticals.

In addition to delivering a practical quantum computer in the UK, a key goal of the initiative is tofurther develop the countrys quantum computing talent, infrastructure, and national supply chain, and to advance the high-performance computing industry.

Oxford Instruments new Proteox dilution refrigerator will be used as the cryogenic platform. This next generation cryo-fridge offers enhanced wiring capacity, multi-experiment capability and improved system modularity. A secondary insert allows pre-testing of the quantum device before fitting it to the main fridge. These features will benefit the collaboration by increasing the number of signal lines and speed up future upgrades, allowing offline component assembly and characterisation.

As we are presently facing a second quantum revolution, quantum technologies are triggering a broad range of diverse applications to address significant global challenges. At this disruptive time in the quantum space, this is a great project to be part of and will help in developing innovative solutions to meet these challenges. I am sure this collaboration will open a new future for many more innovative applications, and these applications will require an ecosystem where skills development, design & engineering excellence, and technology partners all combine to enable new discoveries and solutions.

Simon Holden, Managing Director Oxford Instruments NanoScience.

We are excited to deliver the UKs first quantum computer and help accelerate the development of practical algorithms and applications, said Chad Rigetti, CEO of Rigetti Computing. By providing access to quantum hardware, the collaboration aims to unlock new capabilities within the thriving UK ecosystem of quantum information science researchers, start-ups, and enterprises who have already begun to explore the potential impact of quantum computing.

The consortium is backed by 10 million government and industry investment, including funding from the governments Quantum Technologies Challenge, led by UK Research & Innovation.

See the original post:
Oxford Instruments Partners With The 10 Million Consortium, To Launch The First Commercial Quantum Computer In UK - AZoNano

Combinations of new technologies will upend finance – The Australian Financial Review

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

Banks have sat near the technological frontier for many decades but the maturing of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, distributed ledger technology, the internet of things, virtual reality, 5G networks and quantum computing at similar times will create unprecedented challenges for institutions and their regulators.

The report points to NAB's work to migrate applications into Amazon Web Services illustrating a broader trend that will see US cloud giants play a more fundamental role in the Australian financial services sector.Bloomberg

The Swiss-based forum, famous for organising the annual Davos shindig, is urging industry leaders and regulators to imagine the outcomes when all of these technologies are combined rather than thinking about them individually. The message is it's the combined impact that matters.

This will undoubtedly be immense; examples already proliferate.

Take Barclays' work with IBM. In a recent trial, the British bank used IBMs cloud-based, seven-qubit quantum computer to speed up transaction settlements during a batch window. Germanys Commerzbank is testing sensors attached to construction cranes to tailor repayments to production levels and help borrowers manage liquidity. Citibank is using Microsoft's augmented reality gear to help its analysts visualise data.

It's becoming clear that the most cutting-edge developments are not coming from consumer-facing fintech applications but back-end processes. IT infrastructure and financial system plumbing can appear boring but the forum suggests the most transformative changes are happening behind the scenes, in the B2B world.

It's not so much about the threat of competition from Google, Apple and Amazon, but about these companies embedding themselves as enablers for financial institutions to increase value - and this points to the need to create alliances," says Arthur Calipo, who leads the financial services practice in Australia for Deloitte, which worked with the World Economic Forum on the report.

Google and Deutsche Bank signed a 10 year partnership in July for cloud services that includes a co-investment and revenue-sharing deal for new investments.AP

Given their cloud infrastructure, IBM and Microsoft are the other US tech giants that will play a fundamental role in banking as they help link disparate data sources together to create new insights.

These cloud giants will create new tensions. They will be accessible to new competitors, both fintechs and players in other sectors, unencumbered with bureaucracy and legacy bank systems. Traditional industry lines blur.

Incumbents are starting to understand that it's not so much speed and efficiency that will be the source of comparative advantage in the future, but their ability to assemble, to execute and to maintain healthy relationships with these powerful third-party vendors and, of course, with customers.

Banks will have to be fluent in all of these new and emerging technologies to play in the new economy. The ones that will flourish will need to understand what coordinated deployment looks like and develop a powerful innovation strategy around these interactions.

Artificial intelligence and cloud should be the critical anchors in any investment strategy with other technologies specifically enabled by these, the forum suggests.

Banks all over the world are carefully assessing and developing their relationships with cloud providers. Half of all global banking IT spending is going towards cloud projects, the report says, and deals are getting more sophisticated.

IBM's head of cloud services is briefing local banks and insurers on Friday on how it can help them manage the confluence of technologies. AP

For example, Google and Deutsche Bank announced in July a 10-year cloud partnership that also includes a co-investment strategy for new banking-related technologies and joint product development under a revenue-sharing agreement.

Locally, the forum calls out National Australia Bank's work with Amazon Web Services as a leading example of the migration of applications from legacy systems to the cloud, including NAB's entire foreign exchange platform and data lake, part of its large-scale IT transformation project.

Howard Boville, IBM's new global head of cloud computing, will brief about 20 banking and insurance sector executives on Friday on topics including secured cloud access, advanced automation, artificial intelligence and blockchain, at Trans-Tasman Business Circle event.

IBM, Amazon, Google and Microsoft are battling it out to be trusted partners for major institutions. The forum's report shows cloud is about far more than moving legacy systems and processes to an external provider, to reduce costs or bolster security.

It's also about access to much more powerful computing services. Think "artificial intelligence-as-a-service" and "quantum-computing-as-a-service", where banks can hire the latest systems to perform whatever functions needed.

Cloud providers could also drive banks' "know-your-client" (KYC) tools, analytics for assessing credit risk, and cyber-security services. As AI continuously learns from data provided by multiple financial clients it becomes more powerful than what a single institution could develop," the report says. Defending against new vulnerabilities will require solutions that are at ecosystem scale.

The World Economic Forum is trying of bring clarity to banks grappling with the impact of new technology. This is the 8th report in its Future of Financial Services series. Bloomberg

While COVID-19 has sucked up the banks' bandwidth this year, the forum suggests banks use it to accelerate the pace of digitisation, pointing to cautious signs of regulatory flexibility towards progressive innovation agendas.

Conditions for action have never been stronger, giving institutions the licence to pursue these innovation pathways at a pace and sophistication seldom seen before, it says.

The report provides many other pointers to where financial services is heading over the course of this decade. For example, banks will be forced to play a broader role in the digital "ecosystem" beyond finance, such as becoming a "trusted data steward" under open banking in Australia, and similar regimes, aboutearning new revenue streams by confirming customers' digital identity.

White-labelling of products will also become more common, as non-financial players seek to embed financial services in products. An example could be a gig worker application providing short-term loans in the app, based on data generated by the worker. The lender providing the loan might lose a direct customer relationship but could get access to data as a quid pro quo.

The use of sensor technology, real-time distributed ledgers and open data regimes will also see shifts towards continuous assessment of customers, including "just-in-time" lending where business borrowers can tap capital based on a dynamic assessment of their cash flow.

The report points to the birth of outcomes-based investment products, where institutions are paid for delivering a future experience; dynamic life and health insurance, with pricing linked to biometrics; and embedding payments into augmented reality.

Of course, the technological tsunami introduces many new risks, along with plenty of questions on environmental, social and corporate governance. For one, using blockchain and quantum computing consumes a lot of energy.

Deploying AI in a heavily regulated industry like financial services will also inevitably raise many issues, including the need to explain decision making and create "responsible AI" systems, the subject of a report by the forum last year.

The arrival of these new technologies will throw up many regulatory challenges: emerging risks will no longer sit neatly inside a supervised institution but instead could be dispersed across an interconnected set of players, including multinational technology companies and specialised fintechs.

While the consumer-facing fintechs get most of the attention, many start-ups are building applications to facilitate new market entrants enabled by "application programming interfaces" (APIs). For example, local start-ups Tic:Toc offers responsible lending-as-a-service; Kyckr provides KYC checks; Modul8 can handle payment card issuing.

It's a world where a new entrant can plug in what they need to service the customer without having to build everything themselves.

As Deloitte's Calipo points out, this creates new, strategic questions for banks. As they turn to big cloud providers, will they also be willing to use a variety of specialist service providers for work traditionally done in-house? Will they be willing to let other companies control customer relationships and supply product in the background, taking a clip of the revenue? And how will they manage the risk of all this?

The forum said its next report in the series will help to answer the third question, by examining how all the new emerging technologies create new sources of risk - but also how they will be able to be used to mitigate them.

Originally posted here:
Combinations of new technologies will upend finance - The Australian Financial Review

Quantum Computing Market Analysis by Growth, segmentation, performance, Competitive Strategies and Forecast to 2026 – Galus Australis

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

Quantum computing is an advanced developing computer technology which is based on the quantum mechanics and quantum theory. The quantum computer has been used for the quantum computing which follows the concepts of quantum physics. The quantum computing is different from the classical computing in terms of speed, bits and the data. The classical computing uses two bits only named as 0 and 1, whereas the quantum computing uses all the states in between the 0 and 1, which helps in better results and high speed. Quantum computing has been used mostly in the research for comparing the numerous solutions and to find an optimum solution for a complex problem and it has been used in the sectors like chemicals, utilities, defence, healthcare & pharmaceuticals and various other sectors

Quantum Computing MarketAnalysis to 2027 is a specialized and in-depth study of the Quantum Computing industry with a focus on the global market trend. The report aims to provide an overview of global Quantum Computing Market with detailed market segmentation by product/application and geography. Quantum Computing Market report covers the present and past market scenarios, market development patterns, and is likely to proceed with a continuing development over the forecast period.

Get FREE Sample Copy of this Report @https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-quantum-computing-market&DP

Some of the key players of Quantum Computing Market:

Honeywell International, Inc., Accenture, Fujitsu, Rigetti & Co, Inc., 1QB Information Technologies, Inc., IonQ, Atom Computing, ID Quantique, QuintessenceLabs, Toshiba Research Europe Ltd, Google,Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Xanadu, Magiq Technologies, Inc., QX branch, NEC Corporation, Anyon System,Inc. Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited, QC Ware Corp, Intel Corporation and others.

The Global Quantum Computing Market research report offers an in-depth analysis of the global market, providing relevant information for the new market entrants or well-established players. Some of the key strategies employed by leading key players operating in the market and their impact analysis have been included in this research report.

Market Analysis by

The report provides a detailed overview of the industry including both qualitative and quantitative information. It provides overview and forecast of the global Quantum Computing market based on product and application. It also provides market size and forecast year for overall Quantum Computing market with respect to five major regions, namely; North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (APAC), Middle East and Africa (MEA) and South America (SAM), which is later sub-segmented by respective countries and segments.

Segmentation: Global Quantum Computing Market

Global Quantum Computing Market By System (Single Qubit Quantum System and Multiple Qubit System), Qubits (Trapped Ion Qubits, Semiconductor Qubits and Super Conducting), Deployment Model (On-Premises and Cloud), Component (Hardware, Software and Services), Application (Cryptography, Simulation, Parallelism, Machine Learning, Algorithms, Others), Logic Gates (Toffoli Gate, Hadamard Gate, Pauli Logic Gates and Others), Verticals (Banking And Finance, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Defence, Automotive, Chemical, Utilities, Others) and Geography (North America, South America, Europe, Asia- Pacific, Middle East and Africa) Industry Trends and Forecast to 2026

Product Launch

Download table of Contents with Figures & Tables @https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-quantum-computing-market&DP

The report evaluates market dynamics effecting the market during the forecast period i.e., drivers, restraints, opportunities, and future trend and provides exhaustive analysis for all five regions.

Fundamentals of Table of Content:

1 Report Overview1.1 Study Scope1.2 Key Market Segments1.3 Players Covered1.4 Market Analysis by Type1.5 Market by Application1.6 Study Objectives1.7 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends2.1 Quantum Computing Market Size2.2 Quantum Computing Growth Trends by Regions2.3 Industry Trends

3 Market Share by Key Players3.1 Quantum Computing Market Size by Manufacturers3.2 Quantum Computing Key Players Head office and Area Served3.3 Key Players Quantum Computing Product/Solution/Service3.4 Date of Enter into Quantum Computing Market3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 Breakdown Data by Product4.1 Global Quantum Computing Sales by Product4.2 Global Quantum Computing Revenue by Product4.3 Quantum Computing Price by Product

5 Breakdown Data by End User5.1 Overview5.2 Global Quantum Computing Breakdown Data by End User

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe, MEA or Asia Pacific.

About Data Bridge Market Research:

Data Bridge Market Research set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavors to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Contact:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

[emailprotected]

Continued here:
Quantum Computing Market Analysis by Growth, segmentation, performance, Competitive Strategies and Forecast to 2026 - Galus Australis

On-chain data signals increasing Bitcoin activity But theres a catch – Cointelegraph

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

According to CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young-Ju, over-the-counter (OTC) Bitcoin (BTC) deals might be occurring in a way that is similar to the pattern seen in February 2019. According to the on-chain analyst, this is historically a bullish sign but Ki Young-Ju cautious that the pattern is not absolute and should not be relied on in isolation.

Bitcoin transferred on the blockchain network hits a yearly high. Source: CryptoQuant

Ki also noted that the number of Bitcoin transfers achieved a new yearly high and that these transactions didnt come from exchanges. Based on two on-chain metrics, he explained it could be a resurgence of OTC volume. He said:

The number of BTC transferred hits the year-high, and those TXs are not from exchanges. Fund Flow Ratio of all exchanges hits the year-low. Something's happening. Possibly OTC deals. This also happened in Feb 2019, when OTC volume was skyrocketed. I think this is a strong bullish signal.

High net-worth individual buyers and miners often buy or sell Bitcoin in the OTC market. This allows BTC to exchange hands without placing significant pressure on the exchange market.

Rafael Schultze-Kraft, the CTO of Glassnode, said the increase in volume is not BTC changing hands. Instead, the analyst said that the volume is flat and it represents change BTC. He wrote:

Bitcoin on-chain volume is NOT increasing or hitting any highs. Even by applying the most basic change-adjustments uncovers that the increase in volume is just "obvious change" moving back to the sender. This is not $BTC changing hands, and not real economic throughput Just wanted to point out that this is not the case, volume is in fact flat these are just huge amounts of change BTC.

Rather than OTC deals, it could represent internal transfers or other types of internal wallet movements. In that case, it would not necessarily be a bullish trend for Bitcoin in the near term.

Change-adjusted daily transfer volume shows flat volume. Source: Glassnode

In response, Ki explained that the trends still seem like OTC deals. He referred to the spikes in transaction volume in February 2019. After the two peaks in volume, Bitcoin eventually recovered strongly from the $4,000 area. Ki added:

The point is just the non-exchange / non-miner entities are moving their funds by evoking multiple transactions, OTC tx is just one of the possibilities.

If the spikes in Bitcoin volume are OTC deals, then it is an optimistic trend that indicates the possible start of an accumulation phase.

Since miners tend to sell BTC in the OTC market, many OTC deals involve miners selling BTC and whales buying the mined BTC. Such a cycle reduces the amount of BTC that would otherwise be sold on exchanges and also decreases selling pressure.

But if the rising transaction activity does not pertain to OTC deals, then it is most likely a non-event for Bitcoin.

See the rest here:
On-chain data signals increasing Bitcoin activity But theres a catch - Cointelegraph

Bitcoin and cryptocurrency are no hedge for inflation – Cointelegraph

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

The U.S. Federal Reserve chairman, Jerome Powell, recently announced that the Fed will now shift its focus from targeting inflation to closing unemployment shortfalls. The Fed, in essence, is doubling-down on the same inflationary policies with which it experimented during the 2008 global financial crisis.

Speaking at a virtual Jackson Hole event recently, Powell said the Fed would not raise rates anytime soon. He also said that the Fed would tolerate higher inflation, departing from the historical norm of a 2% inflation target. This cheap money and higher inflation policy take quantitative easing to an entirely new level.

Related: Jerome Powell throws US dollar under a bus in Jackson Hole

A Federal Reserve study on Bank of Japan practices during its 2013 economic crisis warned that higher inflation targets could result in never-ending monetary accommodation, even when real economic activity is strong or when financial stability risks accumulate. The Bank of Japan had introduced in March 2013 quantitative and qualitative monetary easing to stimulate the Japanese economy and increase the inflation rate.

On the heels of Powells Jackson Hole speech, the dollars value fell against the euro, while gold rallied back to its 1950 highs. Meanwhile, Bitcoin (BTC) has plateaued; Ether (ETH) stabilized; and stocks have yet again rallied. The Fed wont be able to reverse the course from its new policy so easily, however.

As governments print infinite amounts of money through bailouts and quantitative easing, inflation will likely send core prices higher. Clearly, the fiat system is imperfect. The crypto media uses the threat of inflation to proclaim the benefits of cryptocurrencies. Against a backdrop of shrinking gross domestic products, economic slowdown, government bailouts and fiscal stimulus, Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies have been touted as an inflation-resistant hedge. The claim? You should buy Bitcoin because crypto serves as a hedge to the broken fiat system.

Bitcoin, however, remains a nascent technology. In times of economic uncertainty, investors still prefer to flock to gold and stocks as safe-haven assets. In the case of gold, according to Morningstar data, the S&P GSCI Gold Index gained 7.2% in the last three months of 2018, while the stock market declined nearly 14%. Even during the most recent bear market when equities dropped by 33%, the gold index declined by only 2%. The price of gold then shot up over the next few months to record levels. Gold volatility, however, can go both ways. Almost a third of fund managers polled in the August 2020 Bank of America Global Fund Manager Survey stated that they believed that gold was overvalued.

From the Fidelity president filing for a new Bitcoin fund to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin and crypto asset manager Grayscale reporting its biggest-ever quarterly inflows of almost $1 billion, institutional demand for Bitcoin has been rising amid the COVID-19 pandemic. This institutional attention showcases the seriousness with which major players have been considering Bitcoin as an investable asset.

Institutional money, however, is only just beginning to enter the cryptocurrency ecosystem, and so the market is still relatively immature and fragmented. Crypto needs more time to grow before it is widely considered a safe-haven asset.

Investors today use Bitcoin as a store of value because they think the prices will increase in fiat terms. Be warned: This shouldnt be the sole intention of investing in the crypto market. If people are investing in this space because the financial system is collapsing, then we will see an unhealthy price increase followed by a collapse in the crypto index.

In such a scenario, investors will flock to the industry not because of crypto technology or the deflationary nature of Bitcoin but because of fear of missing out. Those who suffer from FOMO believe that since everyone else is investing, they should be too. We saw this happen during the ICO mania of 2017 when investors primarily wanted to make money and not invest in innovative technology.

Investors and crypto enthusiasts often speak of crypto in relation to fiat currency, but it was not the intention of cryptocurrencies to be correlated in such a way. The intention was to create an alternative to fiat.

Crypto enthusiasts are the new hippies of the 21st century. We are not protesting in the streets. We are building an alternative. In order to build it, we need to return to our roots and stop correlating crypto with fiat.

We dont want the crypto market to grow because the traditional monetary system failed. We want to see this market grow because investors demand choice and financial freedom.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Luciano Nonnis is the CEO and founder of DXone. Along with Mario Urschitz he co-founded the largest German language crypto Facebook group, Alles ber Kryptowhrungen und Blockchain. They also founded Crypto-Coach, a nonprot online and offline education center, as well as a major cryptocurrency mining facility in Austria.

See the original post:
Bitcoin and cryptocurrency are no hedge for inflation - Cointelegraph

‘High’ Severity Bug in Bitcoin Software Revealed 2 Years After Fix – CoinDesk – Coindesk

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

A previously undisclosed vulnerability in the Bitcoin Core software could have allowed attackers to steal funds, delay settlements or split the largest blockchain network into conflicting versions had it not been quietly patched two years ago.

Thats according to apaperpublished Wednesday by Braydon Fuller, a protocol engineer at crypto shopping site Purse, who caught the denial-of-service vulnerabilityin June 2018, and Javed Khan, a core developer of the Handshake protocol.

The vulnerability was given a severity level of 7.8 on a scale of 1 to 10, which is deemed high (9 or above is considered critical). It was caused by remote nodes failing to clear invalid transactions from their memory, Khan told CoinDesk.

The inability to clear those transactions could lead to an aggressor flooding a victim node with stale data in what is referred to as uncontrolled resource consumption, eventually causing the node to shut down, the paper states.

Layer 2 (L2) solutions such as the Lightning Network, the experimental payment system built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, were at risk due to the vulnerability. Bitcoin full nodes were not at risk of losing funds.

There was no mechanism to make sure that the pending details of a transaction are valid or not. In certain cases you could fill up the remote memory with invalid transactions, Khan said.

No attempt to take advantage of the hole was found in the wild, Khan and Fuller wrote. The vulnerability could not be disclosed publicly for over two years as node operators took longer than expected to update, Fuller said.

While the vulnerability was fixed, its disclosure highlights the difficulties of building a global money standard on programming languages created by humans, not to mention the high technical barriers to engaging in development of the top cryptocurrency.

The vulnerability was introduced to Bitcoin Core in November 2017. Some 50% of Bitcoin nodes at the time were exposed to the attack vector, according to the paper. Earlier versions of Bitcoin Core were not affected.

Khan said the vulnerability could have enabled an attacker to steal funds from nodes that had open channels on Lightning.

Bitcoin Core versions 0.16.0 and 0.16.1 were affected and patched by developer Matt Corallo following Fullers disclosure to the core team in July 2018. Corallo did not answer questions seeking comment by press time.

The discovery by Fuller (who has also worked as lead developer at decentralized cloud storage protocol Storj) was followed by another Bitcoin bug addressed two months later in Bitcoin Core 0.16.3. Also a vector for a denial-of-service attack, one aspect of that bug allowed miners to inflate the supply of bitcoin as they could double-spend certain values, the Bitcoin Core team wrote at the time.

The emergency patch issued in that Bitcoin Core version addressed Fullers bug as well, Khan and Fuller wrote.

A spot was reserved for the resource consumption vulnerability on the National Institute of Standards and Technologys Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) registry as CVE-2018-17145 in 2018, but it has yet to be filled out. The registry acts as a public glossary for software bugs of note.

Bitcoin Core is the reference implementation, or standard version of the network software from which others are derived. According to the paper, the exploit was also possible on several other implementations of Bitcoin and its offshoots:

All of these implementations have been patched.

UPDATE (Sept. 10, 15:45 UTC):Since publication, this article has been updated to include a link to the paper and additional information about one of its co-authors and about the vulnerability it described.

See the original post:
'High' Severity Bug in Bitcoin Software Revealed 2 Years After Fix - CoinDesk - Coindesk

TOP 5 Popular Cryptocurrencies Other than Bitcoin – Analytics Insight

September 10, 2020 | Author: admin

When it comes to cryptocurrency, the first thing that comes to mind is Bitcoin. But besides bitcoins, there are about a thousand types of other digital money created with the help of different software development services. How do they work and how much do they cost?

The currency appeared in 2015, with funds collected by Buterin, through crowdfunding a voluntary donation of money via the Internet. By the way, donations were collected in bitcoins. The value of all Ethereum issued reaches $26 billion. At the time of this writing, one ether cost $352 per unit, which is much cheaper than Bitcoin.

Most of the new cryptocurrencies come from small changes in the Bitcoin code. Like Ethereum, for example. But in the case of Ripple, the code was written from scratch, under the order of venture funds.

Ripple was created to increase the speed and save money on banking.

Ripple technology is already being used by Bank of America, HSBC. Unlike Bitcoin and Ether, Ripple cannot be mined. This is a centralized system where all digital money already exists and belongs to one company Ripple Lab.

Litecoin was created in 2011, thanks to a former Google engineer, Charles Lee. Litecoin, like Ethereum, is a hard fork from Bitcoin. One of the few differences between Litecoin is the speed of transaction processing it is faster than Bitcoin. If in Bitcoin blocks are created every 10 minutes, then in Litecoin it happens faster every 2.5 minutes. That is why Litecoin can process more transactions than in the Bitcoin system. The amount of cryptocurrency is limited, and cannot exceed 84 million units. At the moment, you can buy one Litecoin for $49.

Bitcoin is anonymous until the owner of the wallet is found. That is, all Bitcoin transactions are already visible, but what is the point if the sender and recipient are unknown? If somehow the owner of the safest Bitcoin wallet becomes known, then it will be possible to trace all the movements of his funds on the Bitcoin account, even if he bought a cup of coffee 5 years ago.

It is impossible to track other peoples transactions in the Dash system transaction data are not published in blocks. Operators are responsible for this another difference from Bitcoin. Operators, just like miners, process information on their computers and receive funds for this.

The Nem cryptocurrency appeared at the end of 2015. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, it has its own unique code. But the most important difference is that Nem works using the POI (proof of importance) algorithm technology.

The POI algorithm used in Nem combines the concepts of these two algorithms. POI not only rewards those with a higher account balance but also takes into account how often transactions are made with other users. Each user is given a trust rating. The higher it is, the more likely you are to receive a reward.

The above is not the entire list of popular cryptocurrencies. These currencies are the most suitable for long term investments or for day trading Bitcoin. This is not financial advice you should always do your own analysis before investing.

Go here to see the original:
TOP 5 Popular Cryptocurrencies Other than Bitcoin - Analytics Insight

Cloud Hosting

Internet of Things Security Market, Share, Growth, Trends And Forecast To 2027: Dataintelo – Scientect

Kaspersky: 37% of internet users in SEA think they won’t be targeted by cybercriminals – SoyaCincau.com

TikTok and WeChat may raise security concerns, but Trump’s knee-jerk reaction isn’t the way to deal with them – NewsChannel 3-12 – KEYT

Oxford Instruments Partners With The 10 Million Consortium, To Launch The First Commercial Quantum Computer In UK – AZoNano

Combinations of new technologies will upend finance – The Australian Financial Review

Quantum Computing Market Analysis by Growth, segmentation, performance, Competitive Strategies and Forecast to 2026 – Galus Australis

On-chain data signals increasing Bitcoin activity But theres a catch – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin and cryptocurrency are no hedge for inflation – Cointelegraph

‘High’ Severity Bug in Bitcoin Software Revealed 2 Years After Fix – CoinDesk – Coindesk

TOP 5 Popular Cryptocurrencies Other than Bitcoin – Analytics Insight

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Media Sites

Pages

Site admin