Page 3,225«..1020..3,2243,2253,2263,227..3,2303,240..»

Bitcoins Rally Has Already Outlasted 2017s Epic Run – The Wall Street Journal

approached $20,000 in 2017 and finally topped the mark in 2020. What drove the rallies, and what happened in the days following the peaks, show how much the market has changed in three years.

The digital currency, which has more than tripled in price this year, hit its first record of the year 24 days ago and has continued climbing, trading as high as $24,273 on Sunday. On Wednesday, it closed at $23,299. In previous rallies, such gains have quickly reversed course.

Bitcoin bulls say the money fueling this years rally is coming from more reliable sources than past rallies. Since September, big new investors have collectively bought about half a million bitcoins, worth about $11.5 billion, according to analytics firm Chainalysis, which tracked the holdings of investors with at least 1,000 bitcoins in wallets that are less than a year old.

Notable buyers this year include billionaire investors Paul Tudor Jones and Stanley Druckenmiller, and companies like Square Inc., Microstrategy Inc. and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.

There are more smaller buyers, too. There have been more than 38 million transfers this year of less than $1,000 of bitcoin into personal wallets, according to Chainalysis. That is nearly double the 20 million in 2017.

See more here:
Bitcoins Rally Has Already Outlasted 2017s Epic Run - The Wall Street Journal

Read More..

The price of bitcoin is ‘driven by manipulation’: Nouriel Roubini – Yahoo Finance

Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at New York University's Stern School of Business and CEO of Roubini Macro Associates joined Yahoo Finance to discuss his thoughts on bitcoin.

JULIA LA ROCHE: Welcome back to Yahoo Finance Live. We are joined now by Nouriel Roubini, NYU professor of economics at NYU's Stern. Nouriel, always great to have you on.

We'd like to share some breaking news that's just coming across. We're getting some headlines that President Trump has defied Congress and has vetoed the bipartisan defense policy bill. In some comments, Trump called the defense policy bill a, quote, gift to China and Russia.

And, of course, I know you're someone who does look at geopolitical events. And we are shaping up for a new administration in 2021. Your reaction to this news that's just crossing.

NOURIEL ROUBINI: Well, you know, I mean the president is becoming unhinged on everything. He's literally trying to do a military coup, following the advice of Mike Flynn and others, in order to subvert the results of the election.

He doesn't want to pass the stimulus bill. And if he doesn't, we may end up in a government shutdown. And now, he's accusing the defense bill of things that don't make any sense, you know. He has even denied that this major hack attack came from Russia. He claims that it came from China without any base. And if there is anything that actually can help us to push back against our strategic rivals, whether Russia or China or North Korea or Iran, it's going to be this defense bill.

So, literally, the guy is becoming completely unhinged across the board. It's just politics. Maybe he's trying to prepare himself to run again in 2024. Maybe he's losing his marbles. I don't know what's going on. But pretty much everything he's doing, it doesn't make any sense.

ADAM SHAPIRO: Nouriel--

JULIA LA ROCHE: Nouriel-- go ahead, Adam. You go ahead.

ADAM SHAPIRO: Go Julia. It's all you, Julia.

JULIA LA ROCHE: Well, I would like to shift the conversation, and thank you so much for sharing your thoughts on that, to cryptocurrency. Of course, Bitcoin. I think the last time we had you on, you got quite a bit of attention.

Story continues

I'm just looking at Bitcoin's price now. It's above $23,500. And you put out a tweet that Bitcoin has no place in an institutional investor or retail investor's portfolio. Yet we continue to see big name institutional investors kind of flood the space. Paul Tudor Jones, for example. Even Anthony Scaramucci. And then, we're also seeing the retail investors. Why does it not deserve a place in a portfolio?

NOURIEL ROUBINI: First of all, calling it a currency is not a currency. It's not a unit of account. It's not a means of payment. It's not a single [? numerator. ?] It's not a stable store of value.

Secondly, it's not even an asset. Either an asset has both income, use, and capital gain, like bonds, like stocks, like real estate. Or like in the case of precious metals, they don't give you an income. But gold gives you industrial use, it gives you [INAUDIBLE] as jewelry, and as a capital gain. While in the case of Bitcoin, there is no income, there is no use, there is no utility.

The only thing is a speculative self-fulfilling kind of rise. And that rise is driven totally by manipulation. There's been an academic study suggesting that these pseudo stable coin Tether is being created by fiat. This year alone, the increase in the supply of Tether has been another $16 billion out of the initial 4. So, it's 20. And every time the price of Bitcoin goes down, literally overnight they issue more of this Tether that is used literally to manipulate the price of Bitcoin.

So, the price of Bitcoin is totally manipulated by a bunch of people, by a bunch of whales. It doesn't have any fundamental value. And like in 2017, when it went from 1,000 to twice that, and then in '18 it crashed from 20,000 down to 3,000, I think we are close to the point in which this hyperbolic bubble is going to go bust. And it's going to go bust because law enforcement authorities are having an investigation of Tether and of the company behind it.

And in my view, like in the case of BitMex that was the biggest scam and criminal derivative cryptocurrency house has being indicted, you can have an indictment of those who are behind Tether. When that's occurring in the next few months, there will be a crash of Bitcoin and all of the other cryptocurrencies. They're not even currencies. They are shit coins.

ADAM SHAPIRO: Nuriel, I want to break this down in several parts. Because I think a lot of investors with Bitcoin at over $23,500 today need to pay attention. Why would there be, I'll call it a contagion, if the feds crack down on that other crypto, to Bitcoin? And how do you look at the fact that central banks worldwide are looking at creating digital currencies? Are they different than what we see with the Bitcoins and the other cryptocurrency is already out there?

NOURIEL ROUBINI: Well, there are several academic studies, including one by the University of Texas, that showed that every time the Bitcoin prices are weakening, there was an issuance of this Tether. There is literally a stable coin created out of Fiat. There has been no update that these cryptocurrencies are backed by any assets. And it's just printed by fiat used to buy Bitcoin. So, it's actually total price manipulation.

There's plenty of evidence that there are other schemes of manipulating cryptocurrency. There are pump-and-dump schemes, hundreds of channels on Telegram or on WhatsApp that is frontrunning, that is wash trading. Pretty much anything that is being done for penny stock is done for crypto and Bitcoin to the power of 10. That's a totally manipulated market. It's not driven by fundamentals. It's driven by insiders, by criminals, by whales, by scammers. That's the reality and there is evidence on it. And that's why there are criminal investigations that are going to reach their climax in the next few months.

Secondly, central banks are going to introduce digital currencies. But, first of all, these digital currencies will have nothing to do with crypto or blockchain. Today, every private commercial bank has a bank account with the Fed. We, as individuals, are [? non-corporational ?] are non-financial. We don't have access to the balance sheet of the Fed.

Suppose that tomorrow we have access to the balance sheet of the Fed. That's what a central bank digital currency means. It's not digital money. Digital money already has existed for decades. We have bank accounts, we have wire transfers, we have AliPay, we have WeChat Pay, we have Venmo. We have all sorts of other digital payment system.

So, what's new is not that it's going to be digital. There are thousands of digital payment systems that work all over the world. It's that we don't have a situation where individuals like you and me have access to the balance sheet of the Fed. Once we do, we don't need to have a bank deposit for making cheap, fast, instantaneous transactions that our payment system then clears and settled instantaneously. So, once we have a central bank digital currency, not only crypto-- this junk, these shit coins that don't have any payment use. But even other digital payment systems like bank deposit or Venmo and PayPal are going to be dominated by central bank digital currency. And this scheme technologically has nothing to do with crypto, has nothing to do with blockchain. It's going to be centralized. It's going to be permissioned. It's going to be a system that is going to be private, not on a public decentralized ledger.

So, calling it crypto is not true. It's a central bank digital currency. It's going to revolutionize payment systems and is going to destroy any pseudo cryptocurrency that is not a cryptocurrency and is not a currency.

The people don't know what they're talking about when they're talking about central bank digital currency. They get excited. They say even central banks are going to crypto. Just the opposite. They don't know what they're talking about.

JULIA LA ROCHE: Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at NYU's Stern and CEO of Roubini Macro Associates. Always a pleasure to have you on. Wish you a happy holiday season. And thank you, again.

More:
The price of bitcoin is 'driven by manipulation': Nouriel Roubini - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

Big investors new to cryptocurrencies appear to be behind bitcoin’s rally to a record – CNBC

Stanley Druckenmiller (L) and Paul Tudor Jones

CNBC

A herd of new, big investors are scooping up bitcoin this year as the price more than doubles.

Investors who bought at least 1,000 bitcoins worth roughly $23 million at Friday's price and have had an account open for less than a year, drove significant demand since September, according to data firm Chainalysis. The new cohort together bought half a million bitcoins, or $11.5 billion worth, in the past three months.

In the time these new investors accelerated their buying spree, bitcoin's price more than doubled from $10,000 level. The new demand has helped fuel the cryptocurrency's rally to an all-time high, according to Philip Gradwell, chief economist at Chainalysis.

"The role of institutional investors is becoming ever clearer in the data," Gradwell said in a note to clients Friday. "Demand is being driven by North American investors on fiat exchanges, with greater demand from institutional buyers."

The surge in demand from wealthy Wall Street investors marks a sharp turn-around from bitcoin's first run-up three years ago. The 2017 rally was driven by retail investors, many of whom who bet on bitcoin and other smaller cryptocurrencies out of speculation. Bitcoin became a household name when it first neared $20,000 that year. It crashed soon after, losing 80% of its value in the following months.

Source: Chainalysis

Bitcoin crossed $23,000 for the first time ever this week, bringing its year to date gains to more than 200%. The cryptocurrency has recovered roughly a quarter of its value since Friday, and is on pace for its best week since May 2019.

The price resurgence in 2020 in part has been fueled by well-known Wall Street billionaires publicly backing bitcoin. Analysts say that gave confidence to otherwise skeptical, mainstream investors.

Stanley Druckenmiller and Paul Tudor Jones have both invested in the cryptocurrency and highlighted its potential as a hedge against inflation. Meanwhile,Square, MicroStrategyand Mass Mutual have used their own balance sheets to buy cryptocurrency. PayPal also added the ability for clients to buy bitcoin, which has opened up the market to millions of new buyers.

"We are seeing institutional capital flowing in at the fastest pace in the history of our business, and it is being deployed by some of the world's largest institutions and some of the most famous investors," Michael Sonnenshein, managing director at Grayscale Investments, told CNBC in a phone interview Friday. Flows into Grayscale's publicly traded Bitcoin Trust have increased roughly 6x from a year ago, he said.

Chainalysis also pointed to less liquidity in the market, with fewer sellers than there were there years ago.

Last week, there were 801,000 fewer bitcoin sent compared to 2017. To be sure, not all bitcoin being "sent" is being sold. But Chainalysis' Gradwell said it's a "good proxy" since there are limited use cases otherwise, especially when prices are spiking. Less bitcoin availability "would explain the rapid price increase this week," he said.

As bitcoin neared its high this week, rapper "Megan Thee Stallion" tweeted a bitcoin giveaway with Square Cash App, which was retweeted by Square and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. The endorsement coincided with the peak of bitcoin's price Thursday.

"Celebrity endorsements have typically been a bellwether for the top of the market, so maybe this omen will overcome the fundamentals I have shown in the data," Gradwell said.

Read the original:
Big investors new to cryptocurrencies appear to be behind bitcoin's rally to a record - CNBC

Read More..

Real Estate Billionaire Sam Zell Skeptical of Bitcoin but Says ‘It May Be the Answer or One of the Answers’ | Featured – Bitcoin News

The founder and chairman of Equity Group Investments Sam Zell says he is sceptical of bitcoin but concedes that it may be part of the solution. In particular, the billionaire and real estate magnate thinks the bitcoin community is composed of many individuals that he is not fond of.

In remarks made during an interview, the billionaire, who predicts that the U.S. dollar will lose its status as the worlds reserve currency within the decade, has no kind words for some unnamed individuals in the bitcoin space. A report quotes Zell remarking:

I am very sceptical, frankly, of bitcoin. Ultimately, it may be the answer or one of the answers. But right now, its a world thats extraordinarily populated by chameleons and other fast-talking characters. I dont believe everybody involved in it are the kind of people Id like to follow.

Although the billionaire does not explain how BTC can be one of the answers, the same interview, however, does provide some hints as to why Zell thinks so. When talking about the possibility of the U.S. dollar losing its reserve status, Zell warns:

If we keep doing what we are doing right now, I think it is 10 or 15 years away. If we lose the reserve status, I could see a 25% reduction in our standard of living.

Meanwhile, other individuals and organizations including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) seem to share the billionaires sentiments on the U.S. dollars future status. The IMF says central banks now need to think about the possibility of replacing the dollar with other alternatives which include digital currencies.

However, for his part, Zell warns of the disastrous consequences ahead if the tradition of unlimited debt and irresponsible activity does not end. Many analysts including bitcoiners see the excessive borrowing and printing of money as the prime cause of the U.S. dollars depreciation. The resulting diminished dollar value then forces some investors to seek and invest in inflation resistant assets. Bitcoin is proving to be one such asset.

What do you think of Zells bitcoin remarks? Tell us what you think in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

See the rest here:
Real Estate Billionaire Sam Zell Skeptical of Bitcoin but Says 'It May Be the Answer or One of the Answers' | Featured - Bitcoin News

Read More..

Here’s Why I Won’t Buy Bitcoin, and You Shouldn’t, Either – Motley Fool

This has been a history-making week, and I'm not just talking about the rollout of coronavirus vaccines. On Wednesday, Dec. 16, we witnessed the largest cryptocurrency in the world by market cap, bitcoin, blow past its previous high and eclipse $20,000 per token. In fact, bitcoin went on to also blow by $21,000 and $22,000 within a matter of hours.

For as volatile as the stock market has been in 2020, you wouldn't know it by looking at bitcoin, which is up by 201% on a year-to-date basis through the late evening of Dec. 16. This jaw-dropping rally is rebuilding the euphoria that overtook the crypto community back in 2017, and probably has folks believing cryptocurrency is a good investment.

But I am not part of that community, nor can I say I ever will be. The higher bitcoin goes, the more convinced I am that it's one of the most dangerous investments. Each of the major buy theses surrounding bitcoin can be easily debunked -- as follows.

Image source: Getty Images.

One predominant catalyst for bitcoin is the perception of scarcity. It currently has 18.57 million tokens in circulation and a cap of 21 million. Over time, the remaining 2.43 million tokens will be mined via transaction proofing and block rewards. With only so many tokens to go around (fractions of a token can be bought and sold), the buy thesis suggests that this scarcity makes bitcoin an excellent investment.

The problem is that bitcoin lacks genuine scarcity. Its perceived cap of 21 million tokens exists because of computer code. Last I checked, code can always be erased and rewritten. While it's unlikely that a community consensus would be reached to increase the circulating supply of bitcoin, the possibility of this happening isn't zero.

By comparison, a precious metal like gold has a hard supply limit. We can't use alchemy to make more gold. The only gold that's available is what's been mined or is still underground. When the only parameter of scarcity is written computer code, that's not true scarcity.

Image source: Getty Images.

Another buy thesis of bulls is that bitcoin's utility is growing by the day. More businesses are accepting digital tokens for payment, and a broader swath of people are buying bitcoin tokens for the first time. According to financial services company Fundera, around 2,300 U.S. businesses and 15,174 global businesses were accepting bitcoin at the end of 2019. More than a dozen multinational companies also accept bitcoin.

Slam-dunk proof of increasing utility, right? Not so fast.

Even following its monumental rally, bitcoin has a total market value of $400 billion. That compares to approximately $142 trillion in global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2019. While it's true that not all GDP is consumption based, this $400 billion accounts for less than 0.3% of global GDP.

Furthermore, approximately 40% of bitcoin tokens are being held by long-term investors with no desire to put those tokens into circulation. Rather than having $400 billion in buying power, there's more like $240 billion in purchasing power available, accounting for 0.17% of global GDP in 2019. There are not nearly enough tokens in existence to drive widespread adoption, based on these figures.

As one additional note, there are about 32.5 million businesses in the U.S., including sole proprietorships. Removing these nonemployer businesses leaves 7.7 million companies with at least one paid employee, per the U.S. Census Bureau in 2016. According to Fundera, just 2,300 of these businesses are accepting bitcoin.

Face the facts: There's no widespread utility.

Image source: Getty Images.

Bitcoin bulls are also pretty convinced that the most popular digital currency is now a bona fide store of value: i.e., an asset, commodity, or currency that maintains its value.

Every month, the Federal Reserve is buying roughly $120 billion in government-backed debt. When coupled with the central banks' pledge to keep its federal funds rate at or near record lows, it's pretty evident that the U.S. dollar will be under pressure. Crypto investors believe that a ballooning money supply is a green flag for bitcoin to head significantly higher.

The issues I have with the store-of-value thesis are twofold. First, bitcoin isn't backed by any other asset or government. Therefore, it has no tie-ins or official relationship to the movements of the U.S. dollar. Implying that a ballooning money supply should push bitcoin higher is nothing more than a dart throw.

Second, store-of-value assets are designed to maintain their value over time and protect investors from volatility. Yet in March, bitcoin nearly lost half of its value in a 24-hour period. In 2018, the largest cryptocurrency by market cap shed over 80% of its value. In 2013, bitcoin lost about half its value in about six hours. This isn't how a store-of-value asset behaves.

The truth is, buying bitcoin is pure speculation.

Image source: Getty Images.

Bitcoin optimists will also crow about bitcoin leading the digital payments revolution. Going cashless could resolve the issues created by certain regions of the world being underbanked. Additionally, the blockchain technology that underlies bitcoin could revolutionize the payment processing and settlement time frame, especially in cross-border transactions.

While I don't disagree that a digital payments revolution is underway, or that blockchain could offer global financial and supply chain solutions, bitcoin isn't the vessel that's going to make this vision a reality.

The interesting thing about blockchain is that it can be tethered to multiple types of digital currency, be used in conjunction with fiat currency, or can operate independent of a tethered token. There's absolutely zero evidence that bitcoin is necessary to support a blockchain revolution.

To add, buying bitcoin tokens does not give an investor any ownership in the underlying blockchain. With no ownership in the solution that has the potential to actually drive this digital revolution, bitcoin investors are pinning their hopes on other investors being willing to pay more for a currency that exists only in computer code than they did.

So, why is bitcoin rallying? I'd surmise it's a combination of short-term emotions, technical analysis (i.e., pretty charts), and a grossly inefficient crypto market that overwhelmingly favors the buy side. After all, it's nowhere near as easy to bet against bitcoin as it is to bet against a publicly traded stock.

History has proved that sentiment can shift at the drop of a pin in the cryptocurrency space. I'd suggest investors keep their distance from bitcoin.

Go here to read the rest:
Here's Why I Won't Buy Bitcoin, and You Shouldn't, Either - Motley Fool

Read More..

Bitcoin could see a 25%-30% sell-off in the new year, but it’s still a long-term buy, trader says – CNBC

Bitcoin's record rally could hit a wall in 2021.

Signs in the cryptocurrency's technical chart point to a 25%-30% sell-off that's likely to hit early in the new year, Miller Tabak chief market strategist Matt Maley told CNBC's "Trading Nation" on Thursday.

Bitcoin broke above the $23,000 level for the first time on Thursday, building on a massive, 215% year-to-date rally.

"There's no question it's been a melt-up, and it could last a little bit longer," Maley said. "I think on a short-term basis it could continue a little bit longer, and I'm very bullish on it on a very long-term basis. But intermediate term, I'm a lot more concerned than I think a lot of other people."

Part of the problem is the market's excess liquidity, Maley said. Over the summer, that sideline money fueled the mega-cap tech rally; now that those stocks have stabilized, it's driving bitcoin, he said.

"The problem is it's now taken the weekly [relative strength] chart on bitcoin to a very, very high level," he said.

"It's above 88 [as of Thursday]. That's not quite up to the 90 level that it reached twice in 2017, but those were followed by declines of 36% and 64%," he said. "We're not quite there yet, ... but as the pandemic starts to fade a little bit [and] maybe that liquidity becomes a little less plentiful, this stock could get clobbered like it has many other times in the past."

He noted that just since 2016, bitcoin has seen 10 declines of 20% or more, seven declines of 30% or more and four declines of 48% or more, adding that investors shouldn't underestimate its pattern of volatility.

"People need to be careful as we move into the new year," he said. "I love it long term, but I think it's going to be a much deeper sell-off than the 10%-15% ones we've seen more recently. I think you're going to see 25%-30% easily. Again, I don't think that really starts until early in the new year, but I do think it's coming soon ... based on this overbought condition and the froth that we've seen in this asset class in the last week or two."

Michael Bapis, managing director of Vios Advisors at Rockefeller Capital Management, said he would suggest holding on for the long term, volatility and all.

"It took me a little while to get on this train, but I think it really is the new currency," he said in the same "Trading Nation" interview. "If you have that long-term perspective, three-, five-, seven-year perspective, you just hold onto it."

Bitcoin has become a global currency, a hedge against inflation and something of a "new commodity" in this market environment, Bapis said, comparing its triple-digit rise this year with gold's 24% gain.

"Lastly, it's become a part of a balance sheet reserve for some of these big companies," he said. "PayPal is now accepting bitcoin as a global currency ... starting in 2021. Square has made a massive investment into bitcoin, and it's also using bitcoin for its reserve on the corporate balance sheet. ... Blockchain, we all know that that's the real technology and it's here to stay, and I do believe bitcoin is a leader in the global currency, cryptocurrency side of this for as far as we can see."

"Ijust think you own it and put it away for a long-term investment and watch how it maybe transforms the currency and the world we live in today," Bapis said.

Disclaimer

See the original post:
Bitcoin could see a 25%-30% sell-off in the new year, but it's still a long-term buy, trader says - CNBC

Read More..

Treat Bitcoin like a punt, and not as an investment – Mint

It was the technology stocks in the US till a few months back that were getting investors attention, but that got trumped more recently by the multi-bagger returns of some cryptocurrencies. There are newspaper front page comparisons of the value of bitcoin with the returns on the Sensex and gold, where the crypto emerges as a multi-bagger, giving better returns than others. There are interviews with crypto exchange owners that talk up the future value of this unregulated decade-old virtual currency. No wonder people feel like they missed the biggest gold rush again.

Crypto enthusiasts like to compare bitcoin to gold using analogies of mining bitcoinno matter that only keyboards are tapped and no underground mines are explored. The crypto logo has a shiny gold-like image to emphasize that association, but nobody yet has worn a ring or a necklace made of bitcoin for it is a fully virtual currency that is unregulated.

Also Read | How hunger came back to haunt India

In India, the buying and selling of cryptocurrencies move in and out of being illegal. It was in March 2020 when the Supreme Court of India lifted a two-year ban by the central bankthe Reserve Bank of Indiathat had effectively stopped cryptocurrencies from being traded and exchanged. While the ban has been lifted, yet the discomfort with something that is fully virtual, has no underlying asset value and is unregulated, does not leave the minds of fiduciary-minded financial advisers and planners.

But the returns are mouth-watering and if the buzz around overnight crorepatis is giving you serious FOMO (fear of missing out), lets go through this checklistif you answer yes to all of them, go ahead and put your money in (notice that I hesitate to even use the word invest in this situation) this virtual casino. Go ahead if:

I really doubt that many of the people rushing into crypto investing would check any of the above boxes. It is a rush and most people are getting caught up in the feeding frenzy around the profits that some people seem to have made.

But, if you identified yourself as a zero-risk investor in March 2020 when the equity markets fell 30%, and some debt funds froze, are you serious about what you are about to do dabbling in something that can lose half its value in a dayas it did in March 2018 or get an adrenalin rush and more than double in a day, as it did in November 2017? If volatility in stocks keeps you in FDs, what are you even thinking of when you think you can take the roller coaster ride of a cryptocurrency?

If the itch to dip your toes in this is very strong, use less than 5% of your investable amount in a year, to purely punt in cryptos. Stay away from ICOsinitial coin offeringsmost of them are scams. Stay away from multi-level marketing crooks who will ask you to build crypto downlines to make money.

I cannot say this often enoughfind a fee-only financial planner and build a plan rather than bump around from last years winner to last months winneryou end up holding only losers and sleeplessness. Money and investing is about setting you free, not making you addicted to a trading screen.

Monika Halan is consulting editor at Mint and writes on household finance, policy and regulation.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Read more from the original source:
Treat Bitcoin like a punt, and not as an investment - Mint

Read More..

Massive Bitcoin Gains Are Being Dwarfed By Ripples XRP, Litecoin, Ethereum And These Minor Cryptocurrencies – Forbes

Bitcoin has broken fresh ground this week, climbing above $20,000 per bitcoin for the first time ever and grabbing global attention again three years after bitcoin's 2017 boom and subsequent bust.

The bitcoin price is up around 30% over the last month, adding to gains of more than 200% since Januaryand pushing up other top five cryptocurrencies by value ethereum, Ripple's XRP, and litecoin.

Ethereum, Ripple's XRP, and litecoin, some times known as alt coins, have all soared by more than 30% over the last 30-day period, with the likes of smaller cryptocurrencies cardano, NEM and stellar making even bigger gains.

The bitcoin price has shot above $20,000 this week, climbing as high as $23,780 on the ... [+] Luxembourg-based Bitstamp exchange before falling back slightly.

"While bitcoin has largely dominated the narrative, I believe investors should look to alt coins who have tremendous amounts of development in both the core technology and usership, yet are still a fair way off their all-time highs," Nicholas Pelecanos, head of trading at NEM, which developed NEM's XEM digital token, said in emailed comments.

"Does this leave these alt coins undervalued against bitcoin? I believe it does and am expecting to see the price of these alt coins, such as ethereum and XEM, rally hard when the bitcoin price inevitably slows down."

Many smaller cryptocurrencies are closely tied to the bitcoin price, with moves higher and lower triggered by bitcoin developments and sentiment. However, alt coins often swing by much bigger percentages, often losing or gaining double and even triple digit percentages in mere days.

Cardano, a top ten cryptocurrency, has added around 70% over the last month. Two top 20 cryptocurrencies, NEM and stellar, have more than doubled in price over the last 30 days, as bitcoin puts cryptocurrencies back in focus.

Bitcoin's reputation as digital gold has grown this year, gaining as investors fret over the possibility of increased inflation and helped on by a number of big-name investors who have publicly named bitcoin as an emerging inflation hedge.

Bitcoin's jump higher this week came after news fund manager Ruffer Investment Management moved around $750 million of its clients' money into bitcoina move designed to "primarily a protective move for portfolios" to "act as a hedge" against "some of the risks that we see in a fragile monetary system and distorted financial markets," a Ruffer spokesperson told bitcoin and crypto news website Coindesk.

Ahead of bitcoin's surge over $20,000, many smaller cryptocurrencies, such as ethereum and XRP, were already soaring as investors eyed technical developments and token giveaways.

XRP, a digital token developed by Ripple, made huge gains through November ahead of a hotly-anticipated giveaway of a new cryptocurrency, known as an airdrop. Ripple controls around 60 billion of the 100 billion XRP tokens that will ever be created.

The XRP price has fallen back slightly since it peaked late last month but its currently up by around 90%.

The bitcoin price has surged to fresh all-time highs this week, climbing well above $20,000 per ... [+] bitcoin after brushing the psychological barrier three years ago.

Meanwhile, ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency after bitcoin, is up by 32% over the last 30 days. Investors began piling into ethereum over the summer amid a surge of interest in decentralized finance (DeFi)using crypto technology to recreate traditional financial instruments such as loans and insurance.

Ethereum's blockchain is used as rails by many DeFi projects and some investors think the ethereum price will benefit as DeFi's popularity rises. Ethereum was given a further boost by the closely-watched launch of ethereum 2.0 last month.

Litecoin, some times known as the silver to bitcoin's gold, has this week climbed to its highest price since for 16 months, up around 40% on its price 30 days ago. However, litecoin is still far from its all-time highs set in late 2017, down some 75%.

The bitcoin and cryptocurrency community has been quick to talk up bitcoin's 2021 prospects despite its recent sky-high gains, with many pointing to PayPal's PYPL recent support of bitcoin and a handful of other cryptocurrencies and similar digital infrastructure development as potentially supporting the bitcoin price going forward.

"We are only in phase one of the bull-run," Pascal Gauthier, the chief executive of France-based bitcoin and cryptocurrency physical wallet maker Ledger, said via email. "Many big players are investing time and resources to build or buy digital asset infrastructures needed to support the swell of institutional and retail adoption."

Read the original:
Massive Bitcoin Gains Are Being Dwarfed By Ripples XRP, Litecoin, Ethereum And These Minor Cryptocurrencies - Forbes

Read More..

Why Stocks of Bitcoin Miners CleanSpark, Marathon, and Riot Blockchain Were Up Again Today – Motley Fool

What happened

Shares of CleanSpark (NASDAQ:CLSK) shot higher on Tuesday on news that it had acquired more equipment to mine bitcoin. The company is a technology company in the energy sector, but it expanded its business into bitcoin when it acquired a bitcoin mining operation called ATL Data Centers earlier in December. More equipment allows more bitcoin to be mined, which is why CleanSpark stock was up 18% today.

Bitcoin miner Riot Blockchain (NASDAQ:RIOT) also announced it's increasing its operations. It was able to buy 15,000 Antminers from Bitmain for $35 million using cash on hand. The move increases the company's capacity by 65%, so the stock's 33% jump today was somewhat understandable.

Finally, fellow bitcoin miner Marathon Patent Group (NASDAQ:MARA) might have moved just based on these two other stocks. It upgraded mining operations earlier in the month, but there was nothing newsworthy to explain its 22% spike today.

Image source: Getty Images.

For those who don't know how bitcoin works, here's a simplistic overview. The network is designed to facilitate the movement of tokens, with a ledger recording who owns which bitcoin at all times. Known as blockchain technology, computers voluntarily join the bitcoin network to process transactions, recording them on the blockchain. This means the bitcoin network is decentralized: Computers can be anywhere, and they aren't all owned by any one individual or company.

Computers race to record transactions first, because the winner is issued a brand-new bitcoin as compensation. Unlocking new bitcoin is known as mining. It's an expensive process. Companies invest in equipment powerful enough to outdo the rest, facilities to house the equipment, and energy to run and cool equipment.

Once it's deployed its new mining equipment, CleanSpark says its mining capacity will be 300 peta-hashes per second (PH/s). For its part, Riot Blockchain will have 3.8 exa-hashes per second (EH/s). Marathon will have 3.56 EH/s. For perspective, 1 exa-hash is 1,000 peta-hashes. Without diving too far in the weeds, suffice it to say that Riot Blockchain and Marathon have more than 10 times the capacity of CleanSpark. But this makes sense because CleanSpark's main business is something else.

Bitcoin believers obviously like to see companies investing in bitcoin mining equipment. After all, many think bitcoin is poised to surge in 2021, which would lead to increased mining revenue for these companies. Just how high could bitcoin go? No one knows for sure. Indeed, it could plummet for all we know. But many excitedly project the future value of bitcoin using something called a stock-to-flow model. Championed by a Twitter user going by PlanB, the model projects bitcoin could be worth more than $200,000 by 2024.

I'm not suggesting the stock-to-flow model for bitcoin is an infallible framework. I'm merely pointing out how bullish some are about the future price of bitcoin. This bullish sentiment raises their outlook for many cryptocurrency stocks, including bitcoin miners. In summary, investors believe bitcoin can keep soaring, and the increased capacity will lead to windfall profits for miners. That's why these three stocks are up today.

Image source: Getty Images.

Yesterday when bitcoin mining stocks soared, I pointed out that all bitcoin miners have unique cost structures and therefore should be considered on a case-by-case basis. This is exemplified by CleanSpark's entry into the bitcoin mining space. The company's business is primarily software for microgrids: small, decentralized, self-sufficient power systems. Basically, CleanSpark is in the energy optimization business, and that could be useful for bitcoin mining.

CleanSpark believes it can reduce its power cost for mining bitcoin below $0.0285 per kilowatt hour (kw/h). That sounds low. But for perspective, that's the cost that Marathon has already achieved at its primary facility. While one would expect CleanSpark to have a competitive advantage, that doesn't appear to be the case.

Reducing energy consumption and cost are among the few things bitcoin miners like CleanSpark, Riot Blockchain, and Marathon can control. But the most important factor is the price of bitcoin, which is entirely outside of their control. For that reason, bitcoin-mining investors will likely keep their eyes fixated on bitcoin and not the fundamentals to these businesses.

Read the original post:
Why Stocks of Bitcoin Miners CleanSpark, Marathon, and Riot Blockchain Were Up Again Today - Motley Fool

Read More..

Students express concerns over teaching appointment of Jason Mars – The Michigan Daily

This story has been updated to include information from an email sent by Michael Wellman, Chair of Computer Science & Engineering.

Some University of Michigan students are unhappy with the appointment of Jason Mars, assistant professor of computer science, to teach EECS 370 for the winter 2021 semester. The course is required for all computer science and computer engineering majors.

Previously, Mars faced allegations of sexual misconduct and abusive behavior during his tenure as CEO of Clinc, an Ann Arbor artificial intelligence startup. A Feb. 13 article published in The Verge outlined claims of inappropriate behavior by the professor.

Later in February, an investigation by New York public relations firm MWWPR prompted Marss resignation from Clinc and found his behavior harmed Clincs success, though it also found the allegations of retaliation by Mars did not have merit. In an email to employees explaining his resignation at the time, Mars acknowledged he drank too much and failed to develop proper boundaries with employees.

An email template has been circulating among computer science students, calling for Mars to be removed from the course and for more communication from the University about the appointment. Students are asked to send the template to University President Mark Schlissel and Professor Westley Weimer, CSE Diversity, Equity and Inclusion committee chair.

The University of Michigan claims to want to support women in technology, yet they are placing a known sexual harasser in a position of power over undergraduate students, in a course computer science majors are required to take in order to graduate, the template reads.

Michael Wellman, chair of the computer science and engineering department, sent an email to all computer science and engineering faculty, staff and students Wednesday evening addressing concerns over Marss appointment.

The College has learned that Jason Mars has engaged in conduct that the College of Engineering determined was contrary to its values and standards regarding the conduct of faculty, the statement reads. The behavior was unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the College. Appropriate preventive and corrective actions are being taken in response that will further the Colleges goal of embracing and promoting a culture of inclusivity that is free from harassment and other forms of misconduct.

Despite acknowledging student concerns and Marss misconduct, Wellman confirmed in an email to The Michigan Daily that Mars will still be teaching EECS 370 in the winter. Wellman reiterated that the course will be fully remote and will hold entirely remote office hours.

We will be communicating directly with students enrolled in EECS 370 in January, prior to the start of classes, about instructional arrangements for the course, Wellmans email reads.

As of an email to The Daily Tuesday, University spokesman Rick Fitzgerald confirmed Marss appointment to teach the EECS 370. Fitzgerald stressed it is a wholly virtual course and that the College of Engineering is taking all appropriate preventive and corrective actions related to earlier allegations of inappropriate behavior by Mars outside of the classroom.

LSA junior Michelle Belkovski is taking EECS 370 next semester. She said she could not believe the University would appoint Mars to teach again, virtually or otherwise.

Its the idea itself that hes still teaching, especially a mandatory course, it almost feels like a taunt, Belkovski said.

The Daily reached out to several other current computer science students, including those who made the email template, but all declined to comment.

In a statement to The Daily, Mars wrote he had not heard of the outrage prior to The Dailys requests for comment.

Given the sensational misinformation and false allegations spread in and by the press, however, I understand where the student concerns are coming from, Mars wrote. Students should know that I fully support the objectives of the Universitys policies prohibiting sexual harassment and misconduct, and which promote professional and civil interaction between students, faculty, staff and visitors. I take these policies very seriously.

Mars pointed to his fall 2020 course evaluations as evidence students should not be worried to take his course. Mars taught EECS 498 during the fall 2020 semester, for which he did not face backlash. EECS 498 is a senior-level elective course.

The reality is that students should not be concerned about taking my classes, Mars wrote. My student evaluations from this term (EECS 498), for example, demonstrate how students who have actually taken my courses feel about me as an instructor To the question, Jason Mars treated students with respect(,) students gave me a median rating is (sic) 4.9/5. Students can expect the same level of excellence from me in the future.

Mars provided screenshots of the Bluera results page, the Universitys course evaluations system, to confirm his instructor rating.

Belkovski said the most infuriating part is that the University did not discuss this appointment with students.

You notice all this outrage from students making email templates, open letters, petitions, doing interviews, Belkovski said. Thats where you see that you didnt even bother checking in with your students, the students who have had past experiences with teachers who have already been like this toward them It felt like we were forgotten in this situation.

In an email obtained by The Daily, Weimer wrote that he passed student concerns up to departmental leadership. In a statement to The Daily, Weimer wrote that the email was not an official stance and was meant to reassure and thank the students who wrote to him.

I commend you for bravery, Weimer wrote. Some of you are alumni or friends at other schools, but most are current undergraduate majors. It takes courage to stand up and sign your name to such a request At this point I can only reiterate that your petition has definitely been received, can only observe that the issue is being discussed at multiple administrative levels, and can only thank you for making your voices and concerns heard.

Daily Staff Reporter Dominic Coletti can be reached at dcoletti@umich.edu.

The COVID-19 pandemic has thrown challenges at all of us including The Michigan Daily but that hasnt stopped our staff. Were committed to reporting on the issues that matter most to the community where we live, learn and work. Your donations keep our journalism free and independent. You can support our work here.

For a weekly roundup of the best stories from The Michigan Daily, sign up for our newsletter here.

Read the original post:

Students express concerns over teaching appointment of Jason Mars - The Michigan Daily

Read More..