Cloud Hosting

Department of Physics, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

R. Abbasi

Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Zeuthen, Germany

M. Ackermann,S. Athanasiadou,S. Blot,J. Brostean-Kaiser,L. Fischer,T. Karg,M. Kowalski,A. Kumar,N. Lad,C. Lagunas Gualda,S. Mechbal,R. Naab,J. Necker,T. Pernice,S. Reusch,C. Spiering,A. Trettin&J. van Santen

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

J. Adams

Department of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of WisconsinMadison, Madison, WI, USA

S. K. Agarwalla,A. Balagopal V,M. Baricevic,V. Basu,J. Braun,D. Butterfield,S. Chattopadhyay,D. Chirkin,A. Desai,P. Desiati,J. C. Daz-Vlez,H. Dujmovic,M. A. DuVernois,H. Erpenbeck,K. Fang,S. Griffin,F. Halzen,K. Hanson,S. Hori,K. Hoshina,R. Hussain,M. Jacquart,A. Karle,M. Kauer,J. L. Kelley,A. Khatee Zathul,J. Krishnamoorthi,J. P. Lazar,L. Lu,J. Madsen,Y. Makino,S. Mancina,W. Marie Sainte,K. Meagher,R. Morse,M. Moulai,M. Nakos,V. ODell,J. Osborn,J. Peterson,A. Pizzuto,M. Prado Rodriguez,Z. Rechav,B. Riedel,I. Safa,P. Savina,M. Silva,R. Snihur,J. Thwaites,D. Tosi,A. K. Upadhyay,J. Vandenbroucke,J. Veitch-Michaelis,C. Wendt,E. Yildizci,T. Yuan,P. Zilberman&M. Zimmerman

Universit Libre de Bruxelles, Science Faculty, Brussels, Belgium

J. A. Aguilar,N. Chau,I. C. Mari,F. Schlter&S. Toscano

Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

M. Ahlers,K. M. Groth,D. J. Koskinen,T. Kozynets,J. V. Mead,A. Sgaard&T. Stuttard

Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

J. M. Alameddine,D. Elssser,P. Gutjahr,M. Hnnefeld,K. Hymon,L. Kardum,W. Rhode,T. Ruhe,J. Soedingrekso,J. Werthebach&L. Witthaus

Bartol Research Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

N. M. Amin,S. N. Axani,P. A. Evenson,J. G. Gonzalez,R. Koirala,A. Leszczyska,A. Novikov,H. Pandya,E. N. Paudel,A. Rehman,F. G. Schrder,D. Seckel,T. Stanev,S. Tilav&S. Verpoest

Department of Physics, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA

K. Andeen&A. Vaidyanathan

Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitt Erlangen-Nrnberg, Erlangen, Germany

G. Anton,A. Domi,A. Eimer,S. Fiedlschuster,T. Glsenkamp,C. Haack,U. Katz,C. Kopper,M. Rongen,S. Schindler,J. Schneider,L. Schumacher&G. Wrede

Department of Physics and Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

C. Argelles,J. Y. Book,K. Carloni,D. Delgado,A. Garcia,M. Jin,N. Kamp,J. P. Lazar,I. Martinez-Soler,I. Safa,B. Skrzypek,W. G. Thompson,A. Y. Wen&P. Zhelnin

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Y. Ashida,M. Jeong&C. Rott

III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

L. Ausborm,C. Benning,J. Bttcher,L. Brusa,S. Deng,S. El Mentawi,P. Frst,E. Ganster,O. Gries,C. Gnther,L. Halve,M. Handt,J. Huler,J. Hermannsgabner,L. Heuermann,O. Janik,S. Latseva,A. Noell,S. Philippen,A. Rifaie,J. Savelberg,M. Schaufel,L. Schlickmann,P. Soldin,M. Thiesmeyer,C. H. Wiebusch&A. Wolf

Physics Department, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, USA

X. Bai,L. Paul&M. Plum

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

S. W. Barwick

Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

R. Bay,S. R. Klein,Y. Lyu&S. Robertson

Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

J. J. Beatty,A. Connolly&W. Luszczak

Department of Physics and Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

J. J. Beatty,A. Connolly,W. Luszczak,A. Medina&M. Stamatikos

Fakultt fr Physik & Astronomie, Ruhr-Universitt Bochum, Bochum, Germany

J. Becker Tjus,A. Franckowiak,J. Hellrung,E. Kun,M. Lincetto,L. Merten,P. Reichherzer&G. Sommani

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

J. Beise,O. Botner,A. Coleman,C. Glaser,T. Glsenkamp,A. Hallgren,N. Heyer,E. OSullivan,C. Prez de los Heros,A. Pontn&N. Valtonen-Mattila

Physik-department, Technische Universitt Mnchen, Garching, Germany

C. Bellenghi,P. Eller,M. Ha Minh,M. Karl,T. Kontrimas,E. Manao,R. Orsoe,E. Resconi,L. Ruohan,C. Spannfellner,A. Terliuk&M. Wolf

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

S. BenZvi&S. Griswold

Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

D. Berley,E. Blaufuss,B. A. Clark,J. Evans,K. L. Fan,S. J. Gray,K. D. Hoffman,M. J. Larson,A. Olivas,R. Procter-Murphy,T. Schmidt,S. Sclafani,G. W. Sullivan&A. Vijai

Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Galileo Galilei, Universit Degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy

E. Bernardini,C. Boscolo Meneguolo&S. Mancina

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

D. Z. Besson,M. Seikh&R. Young

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Karlsruhe, Germany

F. Bontempo,R. Engel,A. Haungs,W. Hou,T. Huber,D. Kang,P. Koundal,T. Mukherjee,P. Sampathkumar,H. Schieler,F. G. Schrder,R. Turcotte,M. Venugopal,A. Weindl&M. Weyrauch

Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

S. Bser,T. Ehrhardt,D. Kappesser,L. Kpke,E. Lohfink,Y. Popovych&J. Rack-Helleis

School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

B. Brinson,C. Chen,P. Dave,I. Taboada&C. F. Tung

Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

R. T. Burley,E. G. Carnie-Bronca,G. C. Hill&E. J. Roberts

Institut fr Kernphysik, Westflische Wilhelms-Universitt Mnster, Mnster, Germany

R. S. Busse,M. Dittmer,A. Kappes,C. J. Lozano Mariscal,M. Neumann,B. Schlter,M. A. Unland Elorrieta&J. Vara

Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

M. A. Campana,X. Kang,M. Kovacevich,N. Kurahashi,C. Love&R. Shah

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA

Z. Chen,H. Hamdaoui,J. Kiryluk&Z. Zhang

Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea

S. Choi,S. In,W. Kang,J. W. Lee,S. Rodan,G. Roellinghoff,C. Rott&C. Tnnis

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

G. H. Collin,J. M. Conrad,A. Diaz,J. Hardin,D. Vannerom&P. Weigel

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Dienst ELEM, Brussels, Belgium

P. Coppin,P. Correa,C. De Clercq,K. D. de Vries,E. Magnus,Y. Merckx&N. van Eijndhoven

Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

D. F. Cowen,D. Fox,Y. Liu&Y. Wang

Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

D. F. Cowen,K. Leonard DeHolton,Y. Liu,Y. Wang&J. Weldert

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

J. J. DeLaunay,A. Ghadimi,M. Marsee,M. Santander&D. R. Williams

Oskar Klein Centre and Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

K. Deoskar,C. Finley,A. Hidvegi,K. Hultqvist,M. Jansson&C. Walck

Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and PhenomenologyCP3, Universit catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

G. de Wasseige,K. Kruiswijk,M. Lamoureux,C. Raab&M. Vereecken

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

T. DeYoung,D. Grant,R. Halliday,A. A. Harnisch,A. Kochocki,E. Krupczak,K. B. M. Mahn,F. Mayhew,J. Micallef,H. Niederhausen,M. U. Nisa,S. C. Nowicki,B. Pries,D. Salazar-Gallegos,S. E. Sanchez Herrera,K. Tollefson,J. P. Twagirayezu,C. Weaver,N. Whitehorn&S. Yu

Department of Physics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

E. Ellinger,K. Helbing,S. Hickford,F. Lauber,U. Naumann,A. Sandrock,N. Schmeisser&T. Strwald

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Experimental Particle Physics, Karlsruhe, Germany

R. Engel,J. Saffer,S. Shefali&D. Soldin

Department of Physics and The International Center for Hadron Astrophysics, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

K. Farrag,C. Hill,A. Ishihara,M. Meier,Y. Morii,R. Nagai,A. Obertacke Pollmann,A. Rosted,N. Shimizu&S. Yoshida

Department of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

A. R. Fazely,J. Mitchell,S. Ter-Antonyan,K. Upshaw&X. W. Xu

Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

A. Fedynitch

Institut fr Physik, Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

N. Feigl,H. Kolanoski&M. Kowalski

Department of Astronomy, University of WisconsinMadison, Madison, WI, USA

J. Gallagher

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

L. Gerhardt,S. R. Klein,Y. Lyu,G. T. Przybylski,S. Robertson&T. Stezelberger

Department of Physics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea

C. Ha

Read more:

Search for decoherence from quantum gravity with atmospheric neutrinos - Nature.com

Read More..

Hendrik Casimirs idea for an experiment was simple: bring two metallic objects extremely close together and wait. Spontaneously, as if by magic, the objects will be drawn together. No external forces, no pushes or pulls, no action of gravity or tension or

This landmark experiment, first devised by Casimir just after World War IIand only realized 25 years agopaved the way for scientists to witness the manifestations of quantum theory in a real, practical way. Quantum fields and their vibrations power our modern-day understanding of physics, from subatomic interactions to the evolution of the entire universe. And what we learned, thanks to Casimirs work, is that infinite energy permeates the vacuum of space. There are many ideas in the science fiction universe that propose using vacuum energy to power a starship or other advanced kind of propulsion, like a warp drive. While these ideas are still dreams, the fact remains that a simple experiment, devised in 1948, set fire to our imaginations and our understanding of the universe.

Casimir, a Dutch physicist, had spent his graduate years with his advisor, Niels Bohr, one of the godfathers of quantum physics, and had picked up a liking for this new, extraordinary theory of the cosmos. But as quantum theory evolved, it started to make extremely strange statements about the universe. The quantum world is weird, and its ultimate weirdness is normally invisible to us, operating at scales well below our normal human perception or experimentation. Casimir started to wonder how we might be able to test those ideas.

He went on to discover a clever way to measure the effects of ever-present infinite quantum fields merely using bits of metal held extremely close together. His work showed that quantum behavior can manifest in surprising ways that we can measure. It also showed that the strangeness of quantum behavior is real and cant be ignored, and what quantum mechanics says about the workings of the universeno matter how bizarremust be believed.

One of the lessons of the quantum world is that particles, like electrons, photons, neutrinos, and whatnot, arent what they seem to be. Instead, each of the particles that we see in nature is actually just a piece of a much larger, grander entity. These grander entities are known as quantum fields, and the fields soak every bit of space and timeall throughout the universethe same way that oil and vinegar soaks a piece of bread.

There is a quantum field for every kind of particle: one field for the electrons, one for the photons, and so on. These fields are invisible to us, but they make up the fundamental building blocks of existence. They are constantly vibrating and buzzing. When the fields vibrate with enough energy, particles appear. When the fields die down, the particles disappear. Another way to look at this is to say that what we call a particle is really a localized vibration of a quantum field. When two particles interact, its really just two pieces of quantum fields interacting with each other.

These quantum fields are always vibrating, even when those vibrations arent strong enough to produce a particle. If you take a box and empty out all of the stuffall the electrons, all the photons, all the neutrinos, all the everythingthe box is still filled with these quantum fields. Since those fields vibrate even in isolation, that means the box is filled with invisible vacuum energy, also known as zero-point energythe energy of these fundamental vibrations.

In fact, you can calculate how many vibrations are in each of these quantum fields ... and the answer is infinity! There are small ones, medium ones, big ones, and gigantic ones, all flopping on top of each other continuously, as if spacetime itself was boiling at the subatomic level. This means that the vacuum of the universe really is made of something. Theres no such thing as a true vacuum; wherever you go, there are always vibrating quantum fields.

This is where Casimirs experiment comes in: If you take two metal plates and stick them really, really close together, the quantum fields between those plates must behave in a certain way: the wavelengths of their vibrations must fit perfectly between the plates, just like the vibrations on a guitar string have to fit their wavelengths to the length of the string. In the quantum case, there are still an infinite number of vibrations between the plates, butand this is crucialthere are not as many infinite vibrations between the plates as there are outside the plates.

How does this make sense? In mathematics, not all infinities are the same, and weve developed clever tools to be able to compare them. For example, consider one kind of infinity where you add successive numbers to each other. You start with 1, then add 2, then add 3, then add 4, and so on. If you keep that addition going forever, youll reach infinity. Now consider another kind of addition, this one involving powers of 10. You start with 101, then add to it 102, then 103, then 104, and keep going.

Casimirs experiment brings two metallic objects extremely close together. The objects will be drawn together because of vibrations in the quantum field and no other force.

Again, if you keep this series going on forever, youll also reach infinity. But in a sense youll get to infinity faster. So by carefully subtracting these two sequences, you can get a measure of their difference even though they both go to infinity.

Using this clever bit of mathematics, we can subtract the two kinds of infinitiesthe ones between the metal plates and the ones outsideand arrive at a finite number. This means that there really are more quantum vibrations outside the two plates than there are inside the plates. This phenomenon leads to the conclusion that the quantum fields outside the plates push the two plates together, something called the Casimir effect in Hendriks honor.

The effect is incredibly small, roughly 10-12 Newtons, and it requires the metal plates to be within a micrometer of each other. (One Newton is the force which accelerates an object of 1 kilogram by 1 meter per second squared.) So, even though Casimir could predict the existence of this quantum effect, it wasnt until 1997 that we were finally able to measure it, thanks to the efforts of Yale physicist Steve Lamoreaux.

Quantum Physics In Action

Perhaps most strangely, the creature with the deepest connection to the fundamental quantum nature of the universe is the gecko. Geckos have the ability to walk on walls, and even upside-down on ceilings. To accomplish this feat, a geckos limbs are covered in countless, microscopic hair-like fibers. These fibers get close enough to the molecules of the surface it wants to climb on for the Casimir effect to take action. It creates an attractive force between the hair and the surface. Each individual hair provides only an extremely tiny amount of force, but all the hairs combined are enough to support the gecko.

In this experimental setup, which can fit on a kitchen countertop, the plates dont magically pull themselves together. Instead its the infinite vibrating quantum fields of spacetime pushing them together from the outside.

We dont normally see or sense or experience the Casimir effect. But when we want to design micro- and nano-scale machines, we have to account for these additional forces. For example, researchers have designed micro-scale sensors that can monitor the flow of chemicals on a molecule-by-molecule basis, but the Casimir effect can disrupt the operations of this sensor if we didnt know about it.

For several years, researchers have been investigating the possibility that we really can extract vacuum energy and use it for energy. A 2002 patent was awarded for a device that captures the electric charge from the Casimir experimental setups two metal plates, charging a storage battery. The device can be used as a generator. To continuously generate power a plurality of metal plates are fixed around a core and rotated like a gyrocompass, according to the patent.

The U.S. Defense Departments Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) gave researchers $10 million in 2009 to pursue a better understanding of the Casimir force. Though progress in actually using vacuum energy continues to be incremental, this line of energy research could give rise to innovations in nanotechnology, such as building a device capable of levitation, researchers said at the time.

At the University of Colorado in Boulder, Garret Moddels research group has developed devices that produce power that appears to result from zero-point energy quantum fluctuations, according to the groups website. Their device essentially recreates Casimirs experiment, generating an electrical current between the two metal layers that researchers could measure, despite applying no electrical voltage.

As for Casimir himself, who was immersed in a quantum revolution unfolding at Leiden University, he had a tendency to downplay the importance of his own work. In his autobiography, Haphazard Reality, Casimir said, The story of my own life is of no particular interest. And his monumental 1948 paper designing his experiment ends with the simple statement, Although the effect is small, an experimental confirmation seems not infeasable and might be of a certain interest.

In fact, his initial insight did not make a big splash on the scientific community, nor were there glowing popular press accounts of his experiment. Part of the reason was Casimirs own modesty, and another is that he soon left academic research to pursue a career in industry. But despite these humble beginnings, his work cannot be understated.

Today, we continue to refine Casimirs original experimental setup, searching for any cracks in our theories, and we use it as a foundation to explore ever more deeply the fundamental nature of the cosmos.

Paul M. Sutter is a science educator and a theoretical cosmologist at the Institute for Advanced Computational Science at Stony Brook University and the author of How to Die in Space: A Journey Through Dangerous Astrophysical Phenomena and Your Place in the Universe: Understanding Our Big, Messy Existence. Sutter is also the host of various science programs, and hes on social media. Check out his Ask a Spaceman podcast and his YouTube page.

Go here to read the rest:

The Casimir Effect: Unlocking a Mind-Boggling Part of Reality - Popular Mechanics

Read More..

Scientists are going to extreme lengths and places to try and understand the fundamental nature of the universe.

Physics as we know it doesnt seem to agree with itself. Gravity and quantum mechanics are two pillars of modern physics, but they dont gel well together. One theory which suggests that there is a way of marrying the two worlds of physics is called quantum gravity.

Today, classical physics describes the phenomena in our normal surroundings such as gravity, while the atomic world can only be described using quantum mechanics, says Tom Stuttard from the University of Copenhagens Neils Bohr Institute (NBI). The unification of quantum theory and gravitation remains one of the most outstanding challenges in fundamental physics. It would be very satisfying if we could contribute to that end.

Stuttard is co-author of a paper published in Nature Physics which suggests that neutrino data from the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole might be used to find evidence for quantum gravity.

More than 300,000 neutrinos have been studied at IceCube. These arent neutrinos from outer space, but those created in Earths atmosphere.

Looking at neutrinos originating from the Earths atmosphere has the practical advantage that they are by far more common than their siblings from outer space. We needed data from many neutrinos to validate our methodology. This has been accomplished now. We are ready to enter the next phase in which we will study neutrinos from deep space, Stuttard explains.

Neutrinos are sometimes called ghost particles because they have no electrical charge and are nearly massless, meaning they dont interact with the electromagnetic field or the nuclei of atoms. They can travel billions of lightyears through the universe largely unbothered.

If the neutrino undergoes the subtle changes that we suspect, this would be the first strong evidence of quantum gravity, says Stuttard.

While the search hasnt yielded results that suggest the existence of quantum gravity yet, Stuttard and his colleagues remain hopeful. Their top priority has been to prove that experiments could one day prove the existence of quantum gravity.

For years, many physicists doubted whether experiments could ever hope to test quantum gravity. Our analysis shows that it is indeed possible, and with future measurements with astrophysical neutrinos, as well as more precise detectors being built in the coming decade, we hope to finally answer this fundamental question, Stuttard says.

Future experiments which look at neutrinos from space, rather than atmospheric neutrinos, could answer the question once and for all.

While we did have hopes of seeing changes related to quantum gravity, the fact that we didnt see them does not exclude at all that they are real, Stuttard notes. When an atmospheric neutrino is detected at the Antarctic facility, it will typically have travelled through the Earth. Meaning approximately 12,700 km a very short distance compared to neutrinos originating in the distant universe. Apparently, a much longer distance is needed for quantum gravity to make an impact, if it exists.

Originally posted here:

Scientists are searching for quantum gravity at the South Pole - Cosmos

Read More..

Scientists have created a giant quantum tornado inside a helium superfluid, and they want to use it to probe the enigmatic nature of black holes.

The whirlpool made from liquid helium cooled to near absolute zero moves without friction, making it mimic the way rotating black holes warp the space-time that surrounds them.

By studying the vortex, physicists could glean important insight into the behavior of the cosmic monsters. The researchers published their findings March 20 in the journal Nature.

"Using superfluid helium has allowed us to study tiny surface waves in greater detail and accuracy than with our previous experiments in water," lead author Patrik Svancara, a physicist at the University of Nottingham in the U.K., said in a statement. "As the viscosity of superfluid helium is extremely small, we were able to meticulously investigate their interaction with the superfluid tornado and compare the findings with our own theoretical projections."

Related: Supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way is approaching the cosmic speed limit, dragging space-time along with it

The workings of black holes remain a persistent mystery for physicists. The known laws of physics break in the presence of these extreme objects' infinite gravitational pulls. For those looking to combine Einstein's theory of general relativity with quantum mechanics, this means black holes' warping of space-time offers an alluring pull.

In the absence of a cataclysmic space-time rupture on Earth, the team behind the new study looked to a model system that could simulate some of the extreme eddies that exist around black holes. After supercooling liquid helium to a few fractions above absolute zero, they placed it inside a tank with a propeller at the bottom to stir up a vortex inside the fluid.

Get the worlds most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Then, by watching how the superfluid (which flows roughly 500 times more easily than water) moved, the researchers observed how thousands of tiny vortices inside it combined into a giant whirlpool.

"Superfluid helium contains tiny objects called quantum vortices, which tend to spread apart from each other," Svancara said in the statement. "In our set-up, we've managed to confine tens of thousands of these quanta in a compact object resembling a small tornado, achieving a vortex flow with record-breaking strength in the realm of quantum fluids."

By studying the quantum whirlpool, the scientists found convincing similarities to how black holes behave in space. Most notably, they observed a similar black hole phenomenon called ringdown, which is when a newly merged black hole wobbles on its axis.

Now that the simpler parallels have been observed, the researchers will train their experiment on more mysterious aspects of black hole behavior.

This "could eventually lead us to predict how quantum fields behave in curved spacetimes around astrophysical black holes," co-author Silke Weinfurtner, a professor of physics at the University of Nottingham, said in the statement.

Read more:

Physicists make record-breaking 'quantum vortex' to study the mysteries of black holes - Livescience.com

Read More..