Page 2,810«..1020..2,8092,8102,8112,812..2,8202,830..»

FIDE Rating Reports: Submission Update, Effective July 1, 2021 | US Chess.org – uschess.org

From July 1, 2021, US Chess will require that all FIDE rated events be submitted to US Chess for processing using a FIDE Endorsed Pairing Program. The current list of endorsed programs can be found in Annex 3 at https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/C04A.

As a reminder, the submission procedure for all FIDE rated events held in the USA is to submit the event to US Chess for rating (this can still be done using your desired pairing program), and then provide the US Chess FIDE Events Manager the necessary files that contains all of the required player information and results from the event. Providing these files using a FIDE Endorsed Pairing Program will ensure we can submit the rating reports to FIDE in the most efficient manner.

Please refer to our recently updated FIDE Rated Events FAQ document on the US Chess Tournament Director page at https://new.uschess.org/tournament-directors for more information on successfully running FIDE rated events in the USA.

For questions relating to this policy, please contact the US Chess FIDE Events Manager at fide@uschess.org.

More here:
FIDE Rating Reports: Submission Update, Effective July 1, 2021 | US Chess.org - uschess.org

Read More..

Quantum Computing Breakthrough: Unveiling Properties of New Superconductor – Analytics Insight

The collaboration of the School of Physics and Astronomy, of the University of Minnesota and Cornell University, has revealed some unique properties of a new semiconductor such as a superconducting metal. It has created a breakthrough in quantum computing and can be utilized in the nearby future. The metal is known as Niobium diselenide (NbSe2) that can conduct electricity or transport electrons or photons without any resistance. Quantum computing can reap the benefits of this new superconducting metal effectively and efficiently for new innovations.

Niobium diselenide is in 2D form with two-fold symmetry that makes it a more resilient superconductor. There are two types of superconductivity found in this metal conventional wave-type consisting of bulk NbSe2 and unconventional d- or p- wave type for a few layers of NbSe2. These both have the same kind of energies due to the constant interaction and competition between each other. The research teams from both universities have combined the results of two different experimental techniques to generate this ground-breaking discovery. The scientists wanted to investigate the properties of NbSe2 further to able to use unconventional superconducting states to develop advanced quantum computers.

Superconducting metals, help to explore the boundaries between quantum computing and traditional computing with applications in quantum information. The quantum bits transform the functionalities of quantum computers with much higher speed than the traditional ones. Quantum bits exist in a superposition state along with two values 0 and 1 simultaneously with alpha and beta. Quantum computers require around 10,000 qubits to work smartly and help in the entanglement of natures mysteries. Superconductors can create a solid state of the qubit with quantum dots and single-donor systems. These superconductor metals are known for transforming electrons into a single superfluid that can move through a metal lattice without any resistance.

The discovery of 2D crystalline superconductors has opened a plethora of methods to investigate unconventional quantum mechanics. The top-notch quality of monolayer superconductor, NbSe2, is grown by chemical vapor deposition. The growth of these superconductors depends on the ultrahigh vacuum or dangling bond-free substrates that help to reduce environment and substrate-induced defects.

Hence, the world is waiting for further discoveries of some unique properties of any superconducting metal to help in the advancement of quantum computing that can bring certain breakthroughs in industries.

Share This ArticleDo the sharing thingy

About AuthorMore info about author

Continue reading here:
Quantum Computing Breakthrough: Unveiling Properties of New Superconductor - Analytics Insight

Read More..

The only answer to the quantum cybersecurity threat is quantum – Sifted

Imagine a technology that could undo all encryption on the internet. It would be impossible to trust any information communicated, impossible to verify any identity. The security of our society and our economies would crumble.

Thats the potential threat posed by future quantum computers. For all the good that quantum computing promises eradicating disease, helping us understand climate change, identifying new molecules and materials in the wrong hands it could pose an existential risk to classical computers and existing technologies. Fault-tolerant quantum computers with enough processing power would be enough to unravel all the cryptography used in the modern internet.

This threat is especially relevant when it comes to blockchain. More and more companies are adopting blockchain technology given the transparency, security and reduced costs. 84% of companies had some involvement in blockchain in 2018. Quantum threatens the very fabric of the distributed ledger, with the ability to break everything the secure, decentralised, transparent networks stand for.

Quantum computing wont destroy blockchains themselves. It instead threatens to break the security features that underpin them; the features which make it the unique and trusted network it is today.

As public data structures that rely heavily on cryptography, blockchains are natural targets for hackers looking to exploit cryptographic vulnerabilities. Whether its a public chain used to send, verify and receive cryptocurrency, or a private version built for business, each one relies on blocks of data placed one after the other. For data to be included in this chain, it needs to be added and then verified by other members of the group.

Take the example of a private enterprise blockchain. When one company wants to move assets to another company they put the transaction on a block and add this block to the chain. Other members of the community look at the block, confirm that the correct value has gone from company A to company B and they verify the transaction. Once its added, this transaction (or any flow of data) is locked into the chain for life. Its kept not only for posterity, but so that everyone involved knows exactly where that data has come from. The latter is particularly useful for supply chains or tracking the sources of ingredients in food or materials in devices.

On the plus side, this process means the entire history is preserved, locked and protected. On the other hand, it means that the entire history and its security is dependent on the last block placed. If a criminal were to bypass this security and transmit a fraudulent block, every point forward would be based on a modified version of history. Or worse, blockchains could fork, with different parties holding different versions of the past. It would be unclear which parties owned valuable assets, potentially allowing criminals to steal what isnt theirs.

This is bad enough when the data held on blockchain is financial, let alone as the technology is adopted by health providers, governments and even used to underpin the digital data of entire countries all routes that could be, and are being, explored.

In its current form, the security used to protect each of these blocks is robust and resistant to traditional cracking methods. Yet its facing a significant threat; one that has already been proven the threat of quantum-based algorithms. These algorithms can and will break such keys, and they will eventually do so with relative ease. This means its only a matter of time before robust quantum computers currently under development will be able to break larger and larger keys. Some estimates place this moment as little as five to 10 years away.

The only way to keep blockchains safe is to protect them with quantum-proof cryptographic keys in the first place; keys that are impenetrable from even the fastest, most advanced quantum computers we can envision today. To fight quantum with quantum.

The only way to keep blockchains safe is to protect them with quantum-proof cryptographic keys in the first placeTo fight quantum with quantum.

In a paper, published this month with the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and Tecnolgico de Monterrey, we have developed a proof-of-concept that can be built as a layer on top of existing blockchain technologies. This layer relies upon CQCs IronBridge Platform to generate provably-perfect, quantum-proof keys that address two particular areas of weakness uncovered in blockchain technology. These are the internet communications between blockchain nodes, and blockchain transaction signatures used by businesses to verify their identity when submitting transactions or validating blocks.

By quantum-proof, we refer to keys that are generated using quantum computers, harnessing the innate randomness of quantum mechanics. Not only are these keys completely unpredictable to a quantum attacker, but they are also based on algorithms that are believed to be unbreakable by quantum computers. This technology, available through the IronBridge platform from CQC, works today, even on the limited quantum computers that currently exist, and without ever interfering with a blockchains functionality. It represents the first time ever such a solution has been built and proven in this way.

Yet because securing a blockchain involves applying the same remedies as for other technologies, the work weve done here is not unique to blockchains. It has vast potential.

However, the system is not perfect. Its far more efficient for quantum cryptography to be built into the very bones of blockchain technology, rather than layered on top. It is hoped this research encourages blockchain vendors towards earlier adoption of quantum-proof algorithms and key generation.

Others are approaching the quantum cybersecurity threat in different ways. Companies such as British Telecom and Toshiba are exploring how to share keys using quantum physics; a process known as quantum key distribution (QKD). These QKD systems are still in their infancy, with many technical challenges ahead, but they show promise as another area where quantum will strengthen cybersecurity.

The threat posed to blockchains by quantum computing isnt new, nor is it something thats going to hit in the next few months. But every baby step we take towards faster, cheaper quantum computers today is bringing it more starkly into view. It may be five years from now, it could be 15, but the sooner we protect blockchains and get the basics right today, the more protected it and us will be in the future.

Duncan Jones is Head of Quantum Cybersecurity at Cambridge Quantum.

More here:
The only answer to the quantum cybersecurity threat is quantum - Sifted

Read More..

IBM researchers demonstrate the advantage that quantum computers have over classical computers – ZDNet

Big Blue's quantum team set out to discover if today's quantum devices could be used to complete a task that cannot be done on a classical system.

IBM researchers have finally proven in a real-world experiment that quantum computers are superior to classical devices although for now, only at a miniature scale.

Big Blue's quantum team set out to discover if today's quantum devices, despite their limitations, could be used to complete a task that cannot be done on a classical system.

Since quantum computing is still in its infancy, the researchers leveled the playing field between the two methods by designing a microscopic experiment with limited space that is, limited amount of available memory.

Two limited-space circuits were built, one quantum and one classical, with only one bit or qubit available for computation and result storage. The task programmed into the circuits consisted of finding the majority out of three input bits, returning zero if more than half of the bits are zero, and one if more than half of the bits are one.

The restrictions, said the scientists, enabled a fair comparison between the power of classical and quantum space when carrying out a calculation.

"Through our research, we're exploring a very simple question,"said IBM's quantum team in a blog post."How does the computational power differ when a computer has access to classical scratch space versus quantum scratch space?"

Equipped with a single bit for computation and storage, the classical system is not capable of running the algorithm, theorized the scientists. Even when giving the system's computational capabilities a boost by adding what is known as random Boolean gates, the classical computer only succeeded 87.5% of the time.

Quantum devices, on the other hand, fared better: a perfect, noiseless quantum computer could succeed 100% of the time, said the scientists in their theoretical demonstration.

This is because, unlike classical bits that can either represent a 1 or a 0, qubits can take on a combination of various states at once, meaning that they have access to a larger space of values. In other words, quantum space is more valuable than classical space.

The theory, however, is still some distance away from reality. Current quantum computers are still too noisy to achieve the perfect results demonstrated by the scientists in their paper. But when carrying out the experiment in real-life, with circuits calibrated to run the program more efficiently, IBM's team still observed a success rate of 93%, which beats the classical system.

"We show that qubits, even today's noisy qubits, offer more value than bits as a medium of storage during computations," said the scientists.

This means that even today's noisy quantum computers can offer better performance on the problem than the theoretical maximum performance of a classical device, suggesting that as the technology evolves, the performance gap with classical devices will only widen.

Big Blue's quantum team claims that this is a world-first demonstration of quantum advantage, because the theory is backed by a real-life experiment.

To date, research projects are concerned with proving a theoretical quantum advantage that can only be demonstrated when the hardware is mature enough to run large-scale programs, according to the scientists.

Fromimproving car manufacturing supply chainstooptimizing the routes of merchant ships around the world's oceans: there is no shortage of ideas when it comes to researching how quantum computing could create business value. But for now, scientists are mostly finding that quantum technologies are comparable to classical systems for small-scale problems, and only theorizing that quantum devices will eventually deliver an advantage as the computers develop.

"Here, for the first time that we are aware of, we report a simultaneous proof and experimental verification of a new kind of quantum advantage," said IBM's researchers.

As quantum hardware improves, these experimental verifications are expected to expand from tests carried out at the level of single bits. IBMrecently unveiled a quantum roadmap for the next few years, which includes a 1,121-qubit system to be built by 2023, on track to creating systems supporting more than one million qubits in the longer-term.

See original here:
IBM researchers demonstrate the advantage that quantum computers have over classical computers - ZDNet

Read More..

Is this the first physics problem that the quantum computer will solve? – Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI)

In his PhD thesis, theoretical physicist Joris Kattemlle (UvA/QuSoft/CWI) proposes a physical problem that could be the first one for a quantum computer to solve. The problem cannot be solved by a classical computer, but a quantum computer with about one hundred quantum bits can. On Wednesday 30 June Kattemlle received a doctorate from the University of Amsterdam for his PhD thesis entitled 'Many-body physics meets quantum computation'.

A quantum computer can solve problems that a classical computer would never be able to calculate. Current quantum computers only exist in a few large research labs around the world and count at most a few dozen quantum bits, the elementary calculation units of the revolutionary new computer. In 2019, Google demonstrated a quantum computer consisting of 53 quantum bits that solved a problem that a classical computer cannot solve. This became world news, despite the fact that it was a toy problem with no applications.

In his doctoral thesis, theoretical physicist Joris Kattemlle describes a problem that is interesting for physicists to solve, one that cannot be solved by a classical computer but can be solved with only around one hundred quantum bits. And a quantum computer consisting of one hundred quantum bits is already in sight.

The problem that Kattemlle proposes is called the kagome lattice (kagome is a Japanese word for a certain weaving pattern that looks exactly like the lattice). Reproducing this lattice on a computer can provide new insights into the behaviour of solids found in nature. For example, the kagome lattice describes the magnetic properties of the mineral Herbertsmithite, which was discovered by Herbert Smith in Chile in 1972. The mineral has no specific applications but is an interesting object for physicists to study in order to understand all possible behaviours of atoms and molecules in solids.

The most exciting aspect of the kagome lattice is that it is a promising candidate for proving that there is a new kind of magnetism: a so-called quantum spin liquid (a new kind of disordered magnetic state in which there is no order in the direction of the elementary magnets, as there is, for example, in a ferromagnet, where all the elementary magnets point in the same direction). Physicists think that a quantum spin liquid exists, but have never proven it or found it experimentally. In his thesis, Kattemlle has shown that the kagome problem has exactly the right properties that make it very suitable to be solved with a quantum computer.

The thread running through Kattemlles thesis is the interaction between many-particle physics (which, for example, explains why electrical conduction only occurs with many electrons and not with a single electron) and the quantum computer. A many-particle problem that some physicists believe is a practical obstacle to the construction of a quantum computer is super-noise. Super-noise is the phenomenon that the noise of all quantum bits combined is greater than the sum of the noise of all individual quantum bits. In his thesis, Kattemlle, in addition to his work on the kagome lattice, also demonstrated that this super-noise does not pose any practical problem for the construction of a future quantum computer.

More information

Here is the original post:
Is this the first physics problem that the quantum computer will solve? - Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI)

Read More..

New research proves that quantum computational errors are correlated and connects them to cosmic rays – Illinoisnewstoday.com

LLNL

In an experiment conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, researchers found that the charge fluctuations of multiple qubits, or qubits, could be highly correlated rather than completely random and independent. I found that there is sex. The team also associated perturbations that cause small errors in the qubits charge state with cosmic ray absorption. Illustration courtesy of UW-Madison.

Study by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Physicists and many collaborators shed new light on error correction, one of the key challenges in realizing the potential and potential of quantum computing.

In a new treatise Published in Nature Scientists co-authored by LLNL physicist Jonathan DuBois have investigated the stability of quantum computing, especially the causes of errors and how quantum circuits react to them. You need to understand this in order to build a working quantum system. For other co-authors, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory,Google, Stanford University And an international university.

In an experiment conducted at UW-Madison, the research team characterized the quantum testbed device, and the charge fluctuations of multiple qubits or qubits, which are the basic units of quantum computers, are completely random and independent. doing. Catastrophic events, such as bursts of energy from outside the system, can affect all cubics near the event at the same time, resulting in potentially system-wide correlation errors. The researcher discovered. In addition, the team associated perturbations that cause small errors in the charge state of qubits with cosmic ray absorption. This is a discovery that has already influenced the way quantum computers are designed.

In most cases, schemes designed to correct quantum computer errors assume that errors between qubits are uncorrelated. They are random. Correcting correlated errors is very much. Its difficult, said DuBois, co-author of LLNLs Quantum Coherent Device Physics (QCDP) group. In essence, this paper shows that if a high-energy cosmic ray hits somewhere in the device, it can affect everything in the device at once. It can be prevented. Without it, error correction cannot be performed efficiently, and without it, a system that works cannot be built.

Unlike the bits found in classical computers, which can only exist in the binary state (0 or 1), the qubits that make up a quantum computer can exist in superposition. For hundreds of microseconds, the data in the qubit will be either 1 or 0 before being projected into the classical binary state. Bits are susceptible to one type of error, whereas in transient excited state states, delicate cubits are susceptible to two types of errors due to changes that may occur in the environment. I will.

Charged impulses, even tiny ones such as from cosmic rays absorbed by the system, can heat the substrate of the quantum device to destroy the qubits and disturb the quantum state (relatively) high energy. It can cause an electron explosion. Discovered by researchers. When particle collisions occur, electron wakes occur in the device. These charged particles zoom the material inside the device, scattering atoms and producing high-energy vibrations and heat. This changes the thermal and oscillating environment around the electric and cubits, causing errors, DuBois explained.

Weve always known that this is possible and has potential implications, and its one of many issues that can affect the behavior of qubits, DuBois added. We joked when we saw the bad performance that cosmic rays might have caused. The importance of this study is that given the architecture, the current device design in the presence of environmental radiation. Putting some quantitative limits on what you can expect in terms of performance.

To confirm the confusion, researchers send radio frequency signals to a 4-qubit system, measure the excitation spectrum, and perform spectroscopy to move the qubit from one quantum state to another. I confirmed that it was reversed. At the same time, energy as the charging environment changes.

If the model for particle impact is correct, most of the energy is expected to be converted into vibrations in the chip and propagate over long distances, said Chris Willen, a graduate student at UW-Madison, the lead author of the paper. Says. As the energy spreads, the disturbance leads to a qubit flip that correlates across the chip.

Using this method, researchers also examine the lifetime of qubits (the length of time that qubits can stay in both superpositions of 1 and 0) and change the charge state of everything in the system. Correlated with the decrease in qubit life.

The team concluded that quantum error correction requires the development of mitigation strategies to protect quantum systems from correlation errors due to the effects of cosmic rays and other particles.

I think people are tackling the problem of error correction in an overly optimistic way, blindly assuming that the errors are uncorrelated, said UW-Madison Physics, senior author of the study. Professor Robert McDermott said. Our experiments absolutely show that the errors are correlated, but as we identify the problems and gain a deeper physical understanding, we will find ways to avoid them.

After a long theory, DuBois says the teams findings have never been experimentally proven on multi-cubit devices. The result is that quantum computers can be placed in lead shields or underground, heat sinks and dampers can be introduced to quickly absorb energy to separate qubits, and the types of materials used in quantum systems can be changed. It may affect the future quantum system architecture.

LLNL is now Quantum computing testbed systemWas designed and built with funding from the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Strategic Initiative, which was launched in 2016. It is being developed with the continued support of the National Nuclear Security Administrations Advanced Simulation & Computing program and its Beyond Moores Law project.

In a related subsequent work, DuBois and his team in the QCDP group are studying quantum devices that are significantly less sensitive to the charge environment. At the extremely low temperatures required by quantum computers (the system is kept cooler than space), Dubois observes that heat and coherent energy transport is qualitatively different from room temperature. Said that. For example, instead of diffusing heat energy, it can bounce back in the system like a sound wave.

Dubois and his team understand the dynamics of microscopic explosions that occur when quantum computing devices interact with high-energy particles, before destroying the delicate quantum states stored in the devices. He said he is focusing on developing ways to absorb energy. ..

There are potential ways to design a system to be as unaffected by these types of events as possible. To do so, see how the system is heated, cooled, and exactly what is happening. It needs to be fully understood, throughout the process when exposed to background radiation, says DuBois. The physics of whats happening is very interesting. Aside from quantum applications, its a frontier because of the strangeness of how energy is transported at these low temperatures. Its that. I will make it a physics challenge.

DuBois worked with the papers lead researcher McDermott (UW-Madison) and his group to develop a method for using qubits as detectors to measure charge bias. This is the method the team used to experiment with the treatise.

Featured works, including the contribution of DuBois, were funded by a joint grant between LLNL and UW-Madison in the United States. Department of Energy Science..

This paper included co-authors of UW-Madison, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago, Stanford University, INFN Sezione di Roma, Laboratoire de Physique Theorique et Hautes Energies at Sorbonne Universite, and Google. ..

New research proves that quantum computational errors are correlated and connects them to cosmic rays

Source link New research proves that quantum computational errors are correlated and connects them to cosmic rays

View original post here:
New research proves that quantum computational errors are correlated and connects them to cosmic rays - Illinoisnewstoday.com

Read More..

CSRWire – Refusing Limits with Liz Ruetsch – CSRwire.com

Published 07-01-21

Submitted by Keysight Technologies

Keysight Blog

By Brianne McClure | Brand Storyteller

Two years into the electrical engineering program at Rutgers University, Elizabeth (Liz) Ruetsch called her father in tears. She told him that she wanted to quit the program. The problem was, as her father pointed out pragmatically, she didn't have a plan B.

Liz shared this story with me when I invited her to participate in our Refusing Limits interview series to celebrateInternational Women in Engineering Day. Despite her initial feelings that the electrical engineering program was too challenging and she could not see herself working in research and development, Liz would go on to graduate as one of six women in a class of 160 engineers. She has since become an inspiration to many engineers especially women.

On her way to the finish line, Liz saw many of her female peers come to a similar crossroads and drop out. Thats when she realized how important it is for women in engineeringto have beacons. Liz explained that beacons are people in the industry who inspire you and give you a reason to stick with the engineering journey when things get tough. Once she found her own beacons, Liz wanted to help other women do the same, so they would be inspired to complete the engineering program.

When I spoke with Liz, I was eager to learn how she went from almost dropping out of engineering school to forging a fascinating career in the test and measurement industry - spanning twenty-seven years of sales, marketing, and leadership. She has worked in the US and internationally during her career, including a two-year assignment living and working in China. She was also recognized by the Society of Women Engineers with a Global Leadership Award and the North Bay Business Journal with a Women in Business Award. She now leads the quantum engineering team at Keysight.

Liz, how much of your ability to stick with the engineering program came down to sheer determination? And do you think women with grit are more likely to succeed as engineers?

The women in my engineering program were brilliant and had plenty of grit. So, I think it's more likely that they didn't have good enough reasons to keep going. The program is very demanding, and if you can't picture yourself coming out of it and entering a career that excites you, changing course makes a lot of sense. That's especially true at a university like Rutgers, where you can pursue degrees outside of engineering.

During the program, I found myself looking for inspiration. When I was introduced to a broader range of engineering careers, I became more excited about being an engineer. I wanted to inspire that same kind of excitement in my peers, soI got involved with the Society of Women Engineers (SWE). As co-president of our local section, I introduced a weekly speaker series where people from different engineering disciplines and roles (sales, marketing, operations) would talk about their work. Those speakers became beacons who showed the women in our sectionthat even if mechanical or electrical engineering wasn't for them, they might enjoy industrial, packaging, or environmental engineering. I'm proud to say that the program made a difference in retaining women in the overall engineering program.

We also started a program where girls in high school spent a weekend at the university getting a feel for studying engineering by working on some projects and meeting women studying in various engineering fields. When I received my leadership award at the SWE conference, I sought out the current president of the Rutgers SWE section. I was thrilled to hear from her that this weekend program is still going today - almost 30 years later.

In hindsight, do you think working through the most challenging parts of the engineering program helped prepare you for the real world?

I learned a lot about myself between the time I called my father - ready to quit - and graduation. Sticking with the program taught me how to navigate a hard situation, that I knew would last at least another two years until completion. Along the way, I realized that I dont have to have all of the answers on day one to keep moving forward. Once I could break the unknown down into smaller, solvable problems, the challenge suddenly became exciting and ultimately rewarding. And Im glad I learned that lesson early on because the most pivotal points in my career came down to taking on big challenges that I did not have a clear path to solving on day one.

Can you describe some of those pivotal points in your career?

When I started my career as a sales representative for Hewlett Packard (HP), my customer was a big defense contractor. At that time, I was twenty-something years old and trying to sell to a bunch of guys who were radar, missile, and satellite engineers. The first time I walked into a meeting, they said, "you know nothing about radar, right?" They said, "sure; maybe you have an engineering degree. And maybe you understand circuits and electromagnetics or digital signal processing from your textbooks. But what do you really know about radar? How can you possibly help me?" That was an intimidating situation. Luckily, I was learning at that time how to be comfortable with not having all the answers. So, I said, "You know what? I know absolutely nothing about radar, but I'd love to hear about it." And thankfully, people love to talk about what they are working on. And the more they talked, the more I listened to their challenges and learned what solutions we could bring to bear. Many of these customers became close friends, and here it is twenty years later, and I'm still in contact with them even though they are well into retirement.

Another significant challenge in my career was living and working in China. I had traveled to China frequentlyand managed people there and in 14 other countries. But living and working in China is far different than staying at the Marriott there for a few days. During my first three months, I struggled with learning the most effective way to lead the local team. But once I solicited some excellent mentors and did some deep reflecting, it turned into a tremendous experience. I learned more in my two years there than in other roles I had held for over five years.

Twenty-seven years later, I'm still doing work that stretches me as a leader. Because as I like to tell my teams - it's good to feel scared every few years. Thats how you know you are pushing yourself out of your comfort zone. Before taking on my latest role, I had expressed interest to my management about getting involved with mergers and acquisitions. In late 2019, an opportunity came about where we planned to acquire a company in Boston and set up a research and development team there. My leaders were looking for a general manager to integrate the acquired company with Keysight. It was one of those opportunities that's equal parts thrilling and terrifying. On the one hand, I had an excellent background in many of the areas that touch quantum, including aerospace and defense, markets like China, business models for selling software and services, and providing complete test solutions. On the other hand, I was not a quantum physicist. Since Keysight is a results-oriented company, and I've delivered results consistently in multiple business units, the management team supported me to stretch myself into this new GM role. When they offered me the role, I took on the challenge enthusiastically and started to navigate this new territory.

And youve been in that role for over a year now. Would you make the same decision again?

It was a massive leap for me with a lot of unknowns. But I knew that I would be able to figure things out along the way. Part of the reason I was confident was because of the caliber of the team that I had the opportunity to work with and learn from. And we have since added to that team with some exceptional industry and university talent. Having the opportunity to lead theteam that is enabling our customers to advance quantum computing has been one of the most exhilarating adventures of my career. And were just getting started!

Immediately after we founded our quantum research lab in Cambridge, Massachusetts, the world went into quarantine due to the pandemic. Like many people, we had to learn how to interview, hire, onboard, and manage a new team remotely. Hiring both quantum physicists and software engineers for research and development was entirely new to me, so we formed a group of managers with experience in this area to assist.

In parallel with this work, we also started the process to acquire another company,Quantum Benchmark. Quantum Benchmark was the first acquisition that I led from beginning to end, which was an even more complex challenge. It takes a lot of preparation to identify and promote an acquisition target to your CEO and board of directors. Once again, I called on a team of people with experience in this area to coach and guide us. And it worked out as Quantum Benchmark became part of Keysight in April.

Youve talked a lot about the importance of taking on challenges that push you out of your comfort zone. How does that belief manifest in your leadership style?

For the first time in my management career, there are more people on my team with Ph.D.'s than not. These individuals are at the leading edge of quantum, and they are very comfortable pushing the boundaries of technology. But I did encourage our team to be intentional about cultivating a diversity of thought across the ecosystem as they hired new team members.

Right now, the physics part of quantum is reasonably known. But the engineering part of actually building a computer is a big challenge. To progress this technology forward, you need very cross-disciplinary teams. You need physicists, software engineers, and FPGA [field programmable gate array] engineers. You also need to balance university experience with start-up experience and corporate experience to ensure that the solutions are innovative, scalable, and supportable.

And it's exciting to see this unique combination of talent working together to challenge what's possible. The most rewarding part about leading this team is seeing them engaging with customers and partners, being excited about their work, and having opportunities to stretch themselves.

And now that youve helped launch the Women in Quantum mentoring program, youre empowering people inside and out of the company to grow. Can you give an update on how thats going?

Sure. We introduced theWomen in Quantum mentoring programearlier this year. The idea behind creating a network of women in quantum goes back to our conversation earlier about setting up beacons to illuminate paths forward when people are feeling stuck or just needing some inspiration. When I learned about theWomen in Quantumorganization led byDenise Ruffner, I saw an opportunity to leverage Keysight's internal mentoring platform to connect mentors and mentees across the industry. I then sought out support from our Director of Diversity and Inclusion,Leslie Camino-Markowitz, and she made it happen. We have had over 400 people sign up for the program to date. It is also exciting that it keeps coming up on my calls with customers who've told me how glad they are that Keysight is sponsoring this effort to help with the talent pipeline in the quantum ecosystem.

The program is open to people of all gender identities who want to be a mentee or mentor. And it's not just mentoring on technical topics. A lot of people have called me out of the blue about career navigation. Or they have great ideas but can't get any buy-in, and they want coaching on how to improve their influencing skills. I'm always amazed when I'm speaking with mentees that sharing the simplest things can help somebody get unstuck and make them feel empowered to move forward.

Youve touched a lot of lives over the years. How do you feel when people call you inspirational?

I was surprised by how many people came up to me and said something along those lines after I received the Global Leadership Award during the Society of Women Engineers conference in Austin, TX. I have never intentionally set out to challenge the status quo or to inspire anyone. I like to challenge myself and try new things and somehow that inspires other women in the process. When that happenswhen I hear their success storiesit is special.

Keysight Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: KEYS) is a leading technology company that helps enterprises, service providers and governments accelerate innovation to connect and secure the world. Keysight's solutions optimize networks and bring electronic products to market faster and at a lower cost with offerings from design simulation, to prototype validation, to manufacturing test, to optimization in networks and cloud environments.

More from Keysight Technologies

See original here:
CSRWire - Refusing Limits with Liz Ruetsch - CSRwire.com

Read More..

Engineers ponder what comes next as they seek to avoid another condo collapse in Florida – USA TODAY

Surfside, Florida: Cameras capture moment condos collapse

A security camera captured the moment a condo partially collapsed in Surfside, a town near Miami, Florida.

Associated Press, USA TODAY

SURFSIDE, Fla. Perhaps it was a fatal flaw in the pool deck that over decades weakened a supporting concrete slab, or a rising sea that drove corrosive saltwater against critical columns in the lower-level garage.

Maybe concrete throughout the building had been poured too thin to protect reinforcing steel, or condo owners and town officials hoped for the best when they should have prepared for the worst.

In the days since the June 24 collapse of the Champlain Towers South condominium near Miami, victims, families, and a shocked nation have pondered those theories and others in a vain search for an answer to the same, desperate question.

What happened?

Yet the only consensus among 10 engineers and other experts interviewed by USA TODAY is that an answer will take time.

This will be a fact-finding not fault-finding technical investigation, said James Olthoff, director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, during a Wednesday press briefing to announce that agencys investigation. It will take time, possibly a couple of years. But we will not stop until we determine the likely cause of this tragedy.

In the end, experts said, it will likely be a combination of many factors and missed opportunities that ended in what could become the deadliest building collapse in American history not caused by a terrorist act or natural disaster. The confirmed death toll stood at 22on Friday, with 126 others still missingin.

Whether this particular building succumbed to some shortcoming in practice and construction, we just dont know, said Glenn Bell, past president of the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, who has investigated building failures.

'Major problems': There were many warnings before the Florida building collapsed

But even as the official investigation begins, engineers, scientists, and regulators elsewhere are seeking lessons from whats known so far.

The engineering community will look at this and hopefully learn a lot from it to minimize the chance of this happening in the future, said Reginald DesRoches, provost of Houstons Rice University and a civil and structural engineer.

Emerging evidence points to a potential failure at the lowest levels of the 12-story condominium. Engineering reports and condo association letters reported serious concerns with the buildings pool deck and concrete pillars in the underground garage. Former workers and building residents recalled significant flooding, whether it be from the pool or groundwater.

That raised questions about the potential for rising sea levels and tides to push seawater into the building, corroding materials and leading to a potential failure. Harold Wanless, a geologist and sea level expert at the University of Miami, said the region has experienced about a foot of sea level rise since the 1940s. But less is known about where and how the corrosive saltwater affects structures, and that concerns Wanless.

Exactly what kind of concrete was used in the building, and at the base of the building? … Thats very important because there are all kinds of concrete, Wanless said. Some are very good and can handle salt well. And there are others that dont do well at all.

Files from the Florida Department of Transportation show that the groundwater near Champlain South begins about 2.5 feet underground and is moderately aggressive in its corrosiveness. The groundwater quality came up during construction in a 1979 notice sent by Miami-Dade Countys environmental resources management division. It noted that due to the high chloride content and elevation of the groundwater at this location, builders would have to install special fiberglass tanks for gas and oil that wouldnt corrode.

The Backstory: What our reporters saw, heard and experienced at the Florida condo collapse

But those conditions arent remarkably different from any other place along the barrier island where Surfside rests, according to Lee Hefty, the current director of Miami-Dades environmental division. Numerous experts noted that similar projects have long been constructed in coastal areas without incident, so long as the engineering and maintenance are sound.

You can build anywhere as long as you provide the necessary strength to support your structure, said Abieyuwa Aghayere, a professor of structural engineering at Drexel University in Philadelphia. In an environment like this, what it calls for is a more regular, periodic inspection of these kinds of buildings, because its a very corrosive environment.

Reviewing original design plans of the building, Aghayere saw indications of vulnerabilities to coastal conditions. In addition to seawater pushing up against and corroding weight-bearing structures at lower levels, corrosive salt air can eat away at concrete and exposed metal if they are not properly protected.

Aghayere noted that designs called for three-quarters of an inch of concrete around the reinforcing steel bars known as rebar in balconies and the buildings slabs. Current engineering standards call for 1.5 inches, but Aghayere and other experts werent sure what requirements were in place when the building was constructed. The thin concrete layer could have led to exposure and weakening of the rebar.

Indeed, numerous inspections and reports filed over the past three years showed crumbling concrete and exposed rebar at several places in the building.

I can see why thered be issues with the rebar in that kind of environment, Aghayere said.

He and others said inspections should occur more regularly than the 40 years required by Miami-Dade and Broward counties for recertification.

In coastal areas, recertification, in my opinion, should take place at a 20-year building anniversary and then every 10 years, said Jorge Kuperman, principal architect of JSK Architectural Group in nearby Coral Gables, Florida.

Two days after the collapse, Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava announced 30-day audits of hundreds of buildings that are at least five stories and 40 years old to ensure they complied with the countys existing recertification requirement.

Florida lawmakers are thinking about going further.

State Sen. Jason Pizzo said he plans to file legislation that would likely focus on building requirements, re-inspection standards for older buildings, the risk of seawater intrusion and the financial obligations of condominium associations.

We should at least be looking at two things: The actual physical structure itself, the design and material used, and the accelerated environmental conditions that are affecting these buildings near the beach, said Pizzo, a Democrat whose district includes Surfside and 14 other Miami-Dade municipalities.

In addition to earlier and more rigorous inspections, experts pointed to some scientific techniques that could avert similar catastrophes.

After a consulting engineer warned of concrete deterioration in a 2018 report to the condo association, tests should have been done on the concretes strength either by compressing it or conducting a chemical analysis, said Syed Ashraf, a structural engineer who has experience retrofitting older high-rises in Miami. Ashraf said such testing is simple and not really expensive.

If the inspector had tested the concrete at the time, Ashraf surmised, he would have seen that the strength of the concrete was very low and there was danger of a collapse.

It remains unclear if failing concrete played a role in the buildings collapse. Some experts noted it could have been triggered by an unidentified event or one difficult to anticipate, such as a sinkhole in the underlying limestone bedrock.

As first reported by USA TODAY, a 2020 study that used satellite data to analyze flooding in the Miami area found that Champlain South appeared to be sinking at a rate of about 2 millimeters a year in the 1990s. The technology could not determine whether the land beneath the condo was actually sinking, or whether a structural flaw was causing the building to sink into the earth or sag onto itself.

Still, Shimon Wdowinski, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environment at Florida International University who conducted the study, said the incident made him realize the potential to use the technology to detect issues with buildings.

Another technology called lidar, a laser-based system that can scan environments and buildings to create a digital map, also shows promise, said Clinton Andrews, a professor of urban planning and director of the Center for Green Building at Rutgers University.

Researchers at Rutgers last year drove a car equipped with the technology around the beach town of Asbury Park, New Jersey, and created a three-dimensional replica of it, Andrews said. They also used it on several buildings in the Bronx in New York City, where they combined lidar with thermal imaging to detect structural defects in buildings, such as a contractor forgetting to install insulation and a leak causing water damage.

Andrews said the technologys cost is decreasing to levels affordable at the municipal level. It could detect structural problems in buildings and help prevent future catastrophes.

Its sensitive enough to detect issues like subsidence, Andrews said, using the scientific term for sinking earth.

Even with the best possible technology to detect a problem, experts said preventing disasters still depends on humans raising alarms and someone responding.

While lawsuits and public debate will parse over what should have been done about the early warnings at Champlain Towers South, the experts were slow to find fault.

Bell, with the American Society of Civil Engineers, cautioned against jumping to conclusions that engineers who inspected the building on behalf of the condo failed to take proper action.

"It's very difficult to judge what is in an evaluator's mind and what actions he should or should not have taken," Bell said.

Kuperman, the Miami-area architect, said nothing in the Miami-Dade code stipulates when an engineer is to raise an alarm.

In fact, a licensed professional does not have the faculty or authority to raise alarms but (only) to put on record what is observed, Kuperman said.

Instead, the experts said responsibility for determining when a building is unsafe and needs to be condemned or evacuated should fall on cities or counties. Ashraf, the structural engineer working in Miami, took issue with Ross Prieto, a former Surfside building official who after receiving the 2018 inspection report told the condo association that the building was in very good shape, according to minutes of an association meeting.

I totally disagree with the building official, Asharaf said. He should have given a notice of violation. It does not mean that he's shutting the building down, but it would have expedited the process and the collapse would not have happened.

Prieto has not returned calls and messages left by USA TODAY.

Asked whether the incident could trigger changes in how engineers respond to troubling inspections, Bell said that a professional obligation to protect the public is already written into engineering codes and standards.

If there is an issue where a structural engineer feels there is an imminent threat to public safety, they need to do things to encourage that its addressed, Bell said.

As more facts emerge, Bell said he believes the engineering community will make changes to safeguard buildings. That typically starts with new national policies among engineering organizations that filter down into new state and local laws.

Since this failure, there have been discussions in the profession about what were doing currently and what well be doing going forward, Bell said.

Aleszu Bajak, John Kennedy, Sudiksha Kochi, Erin Mansfield, Jesse Mendoza, Rick Neale, and Elizabeth Weise of the USA TODAY Network contributed.

Read more from the original source:

Engineers ponder what comes next as they seek to avoid another condo collapse in Florida - USA TODAY

Read More..

Engineering school creating tools for the next generation of warfare – Business Observer

When you think of a satellite, what comes to mind? Some sort of spaceship with panels beaming information back and forth from Earth? Or, maybe, a dish on a neighbors roof or behind a house off some country road?

Youd be right in both cases. But the satellite sitting on a worktable at the Institute of Applied Engineering in Tampa is different.

Its a little black box, about the size of a box of playing cards if the playing cards were square. It opens, revealing panels covered in panels that the military uses towell thats about all that can be said about this satellite for now.

Actually, one more thing can be said about it: It was designed at the institute by a group of engineers as part of a military contract. It will be tested in a real-world environment outer space and one day, possibly, manufactured by contractors at the request of the Pentagon.

'I believe engineering should be everywhere. Engineering should be on display. Engineering should be out with the community, not behind castlewalls.RobertBishop,Institute ofApplied Engineering, Tampa

Tucked in a corner of the University Mall on Fowler Avenue in Tampa, next to what once was a Dillards, the institute, a nonprofit that is partof the University of South Floridas school of engineering, works on government research contracts. It's focus:find engineering solutions for the Department of Defense, federal and state agencies, as well asvarious industries. A working lab, the institute also gives undergraduate students workforce skills and helps others work on advanced degrees.

The space it occupies is part of a redevelopment of the mall aimed atcreating a hub of innovation-focused tenants, mostly in research, technology and medicine.The project is called Rithm At Uptown it stands for research, innovation, technology, humanity and medicine.

As the rare shopper straggles by, engineers, scientistsand technicians inside the institutes facility work awayon hardware-and-software-based applied research, as well developing advanced technological tools.

RobertBishop, dean of the USF engineering school and president and CEO of the institute, began thinking about the Institute as far back as 2015.

Raised on military bases in Europe, he earned his undergraduate and masters degrees from Texas A&M and is Ph.D. from Rice University. After a few years in the private sector, he joined the faculty at The University of Texas in Austin and later moved to Marquette University in Milwaukee. He came to USFas dean of the engineering school about seven years ago.

Bishop consideredthe institute an avenue to catapult the school of engineering into one of the top programs in the country. For that to happen, though, USF needed to work with specialists and organizations in order to improve itsresearch and create the academic backbone.

The key to that was building a relationship with the Department of Defense, particularly MacDill Air Force Base, a 20-mile drive from campus.

He began to develop the relationships and in February 2020 the U.S. Special Operations Command, based at MacDill, awarded the Institute a five-year contract that could, eventually, be worth up to $85 million. The contract, according to the Institute, calls for it to use its expertise in applied research and advanced technology developmentsto support USSOCOMs needs in a range of scientific and engineering disciplines.

SOCOM develops and employs fully capable Special Operations Forces to conduct global special operations, according to its website. Its duties are the stuff of Tom Clancy novels, counterterrorism, humanitarian assistance, special reconnaissance and countering weapons of mass destruction.

For Bishop, the institute and the work it does with the military, and others, is about doing what engineers do best: solving problems.

Bishop believes that engineers working with others, from any field, can develop solutions for a host of issues from finding ways to deal with the long term effects of repetitive, sub-concussive blasts on soldiers, to designing and operating small satellites that push the frontiers of thin communications into orbit, to helping policymakers make decisions that will lead to wars that are less lethal.

I believe engineering should be everywhere, Bishop says. Engineering should be on display. Engineering should be out with the community, not behind castlewalls.

The institute, though, is not actually working to develop products. What it does is research and find solutions, building prototypes passed onto the agency that hired it. Said agency then evaluates the product and makes a determination whether to move forward with contractors.

One of the Institutes main, though unheralded, functions is giving engineering students real life experience, preparing them to go out into the workforce locally and statewide. Bishop saysthe Institutes ability to get these students hands-on training, while not flashy, is crucial.

In my opinion, thats a part of our mission. That maybe doesnt sound as exciting as putting satellites up in space, Bishop says, but we put satellites up in space with 23 students, undergrads. Undergraduates helped build and design three satellites.

The students work with Ph.D. candidates and established engineers on a wide range of projects at the institute. Rather than working on theoretical projects and assignments in a classroom, students workon contracts for clients. That means they have to learn to handle oversight and be accountable while meeting the rigorous standards demanded by a paying client. And in most cases, that client is the U.S. Department of Defense.

To me, thats the story. That industry is benefitting from the work were doing here, Bishop says. We are an educational institution, our main mission is students. But its very rare that you have an organization that giving students the opportunity to do things with a customer.

Visit link:

Engineering school creating tools for the next generation of warfare - Business Observer

Read More..

Three really exciting engineering jobs open at the moment – VentureBeat

Where does your enterprise stand on the AI adoption curve? Take our AI survey to find out.

After what feels like a lifetime of lockdowns, restrictions, and hitting pause on life, things are slowly returning to normal. And frankly, we couldnt be happier. During this global pandemic, countless businesses all over the world introduced hiring freezes, furlough schemes and had to make some tough decisions. But there has been a shift, and we have front row seats. The world is returning to work, and this has resulted in some pretty amazing companies setting off on hiring sprees, with growth ambitions for the next few months.

And thats what brings us here today. We wanted to shine a bit of a spotlight on three brilliant jobs that are open right now, and give you a bit of cool information about them.

Core Hosts are the heart and soul of Airbnb and their truest differentiator. Hosts are the brand and enable amazing travel experiences for guests. They are ordinary people who had the courage to share their primary and secondary homes with complete strangers across the world.

As a senior technical individual contributor, you will partner closely with the CTO of Hosting and senior leaders across the broader technical organization. Although you will be at one of the highest levels of seniority, all individual contributors at Airbnb are Software Engineers which means we expect you to be hands on and contribute code.

The successful candidate will define overall technical architecture for major parts of the Hosting business, and architect large-scale reliable systems to support continuous growth of the business. They will also influence the organization, engineering leaders, product managers, and the business to develop a unified approach to overall Hosting architecture.

Apex Tech Solution is looking for a System Administrator to maintain, upgrade, and manage their software, hardware, and networks. Resourcefulness is a necessary skill in this role. You should be able to diagnose and resolve problems quickly. You should have the patience to communicate with a variety of interdisciplinary teams and users. Your goal will be to ensure that their technology infrastructure runs smoothly and efficiently.

The successful candidate will be responsible for installing and configuring software and hardware, managing network servers, and technology tools. They will monitor performance and maintain systems according to requirements, and also take the lead on troubleshooting issues and outages. In order to be successful in this role, you will need to have proven experience as a System Administrator, Network Administrator, or similar role, along with extensive experience with databases, networks (LAN, WAN), and patch management. Knowledge of system security (e.g. intrusion detection systems) and data backup/recovery is also a plus.

Everyone at Airbnb thinks about trust, but this team obsesses over it daily. At the core of trust is safety, and they spend a significant amount of their time and energy keeping the community safe. The Trust Org is responsible for protecting the Airbnb community and platform from fraud while also ensuring that hosts, guests, homes, and experiences meet high standards. They constantly work to fight against online and offline fraud. They also work on the onboarding and screening of users, and think about complex topics such as identity to ensure that every interaction with Airbnb helps build trust. Trust Engineering within the Trust Org is responsible for the technology vision and development of a complex stack that runs on every key interaction on the platform.

Theyre looking for a senior staff engineer to join their Foundational Modeling team (part of Trust Engineering) that is responsible for a Machine Learning Platform, a core capability that enables Trust product teams to build machine learning solutions to stop bad actors from doing bad things on Airbnb. As a senior staff engineer on the Foundational Modeling team, you will help keep Airbnb users safe by working across diverse teams and systems to enable sophisticated safety strategies. You are eager to understand complex systems top to bottom and thrive working across technologies and codebases.

More here:

Three really exciting engineering jobs open at the moment - VentureBeat

Read More..