Page 26«..1020..25262728..4050..»

Engineering firm to help plan for Milwaukees Northridge Mall redevelopment – Finance and Commerce

MILWAUKEE The city of Milwaukee has picked an engineering consultant to help plan for the replacement of the former Northridge Mall.

The citys Redevelopment Authority on Wednesday chose Milwaukee-based GRAEF to enter a contract for planning, urban design and market analysis services of the 53-acre mall site, according to an agenda.

The contract was worth $125,000 and most of the money comes from a Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. grant. The money is meant for advancing market interviews, engaging with the community and researching the existing conditions of the project area.

GRAEFs work with the city will piggyback off the Department of Public Works existing master engineering and related consultant services contracts with the company, the agenda showed.

The city expressed interest in redeveloping the mall since it took over the property near North 76th Street and West Brown Deer Road in January. Its not clear yet what redevelopment will look like, but city officials said they were taking suggestions online and wanted the area to be an asset to local residents and business.

In January, the city took ownership of three buildings that made up the former mall through tax foreclosure following a years-long battle with its owner. The mall has been closed since 2003 and over the past several years it has been targeted by vandals and trespassers. After gaining ownership, the city contracted Veit & Company to remove asbestos and completely tear down the buildings.

Veit & Company won the low bid for nearly $11 million, according to the Department of City Development. The city expects the asbestos abatement and interior cleanup to take four to six months.

The city expects mechanical demolition to start in the fall or winter of 2024 and wrap up in summer 2025 as an eight- to 10-month process. After demolition, around 53 acres of land will be open for development.

The mall first closed in 2003 and was bought by China-based U.S. Black Spruce Enterprise Group in 2008. The owner promised plans for an Asian market, but those plans never moved forward. The city enacted a raze order for the crumbling mall in 2019, but the owners disputed it.

In 2017, the city took ownership of an attached Boston Store through the owner of Penzeys Spices. The city hired HM Brandt to tear down the 7.6-acre property.

Gov. Tony Evers allocated $15 million in American Rescue Plan Act funding to demolish and redevelop the former Northridge Mall.

Read more here:

Engineering firm to help plan for Milwaukees Northridge Mall redevelopment - Finance and Commerce

Read More..

What Executives Should Know About Component Search in Engineering – CEOWORLD magazine

We rarely give much thought to the numerous parts that go into the various goods we use on a daily basis, such as cars and home appliances. For modern life to be practical and convenient, a massive ecosystem of parts and components is required. Comprehending this complex network brings to light the enormous effort and knowledge of industrial designers and engineers, who put in many hours to make sure everything functions properly.

The Structure of Everyday Products

Think about a coffee maker: the rocker switch, foamer head, adapter, waste drawer for coffee grounds, and heating element are only a few of its forty-five parts. With 125 components, including springs, motors, valves, nozzles, and thermostats, a dryer is even more intricate. With almost 30,000 parts, including switches, alternators, hubs and bearings, brackets, and sensors, cars represent the peak of complexity.

Every one of these components is essential to the products performance and operation. Not only is it difficult for engineers to develop these components, but it can also be difficult to locate, pick, and source them.

Difficulties for Engineers in Sourcing Components

Engineers have multiple approaches at their disposal for acquiring components, each with pros and cons of its own. These include:

The Expense and Duration of Sourcing Components

A fascinating study shows that 45% of design engineers look up component data for more than 60 minutes per day. This translates to a maximum of 625 hours and a substantial financial outlay of up to $70,000 per engineer every year. The requirement for a more simplified solution is highlighted by the inefficiencies in the current procedure.

Presenting New Technologies

This problem can be solved by new technologies, which provide a powerful, effective, and all-inclusive component search engine. In the event that an engineer requires a particular component, such as a pipe adapter, new tech may offer numerous advantageous attributes:

Efficient Component Searchs Effects

Engineers can cut down on the amount of time spent searching and choosing parts by utilizing a strong tool. Engineers may concentrate more on design and innovation and save money by using this efficiency instead of wasting time on the tedious task of sourcing components.

In Summary

Finding precise, timely, and pertinent data regarding the components they require presents several issues for engineers. Even though they are diverse, traditional approaches frequently lack comprehensiveness and efficiency. New technologies may present a viable substitute by offering an extensive, current, and user-friendly database of parts. This lowers expenses and saves time, but it also

improves the entire process of design, empowering engineers to produce better, more dependable products. Tools that simplify and improve design workflows will be more and more important in promoting innovation and productivity in product development as technology advances worldwide.

Have you read? Richest Countries In Europe In 2024. Most Attractive Countries To Private Equity, Venture Capital, and Hedge Fund Investors. Revealed: Highest-paid news media executive in the United Kingdom. Countries Leading the Way on Climate Change. Worlds Best Countries For Adventure Tourism.

Read more here:

What Executives Should Know About Component Search in Engineering - CEOWORLD magazine

Read More..

Two new 3D printing technologies you should be watching – ENGINEERING.com

Why Grid Logic and Fugo Precision were turning heads at RAPID + TCT 2024.

3D printing seems like a novel technology to many people, but its already been around for more than 30 years. In that time, the industry has aligned on classifying various additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, as evidenced in the seven process categories laid out in ISO/ASTM 52900:2021:

Although these generally well-understood processes have been used in various industries, they arent the only ways to 3D print parts. Two exhibitors in particular at this years RAPID + TCT tradeshow showcased technologies that dont fit neatly into the above categories but could presage the future of additive manufacturing.

While hot isostatic processing (HIP) is a common post-processing step in many 3D printing applications, its a core part of the AM tech stack at Grid Logic. This is a dry powder print, explains Jim Holcomb, director of product development at the Lapeer, Mich.-based company. We can work with any metal or ceramic powder that will flow through our printer, and we havent found a lot that doesnt.

Unlike binder or material jetting, Grid Logics approach doesnt use any liquid component. Instead, all the powder layers are deposited into a sealed container (the can) and compressed slightly before the HIP cycle. Theres no shift in the material, Holcomb says, Were shipping cans four hours away and we dont get any shift after compaction. The parts are 100% dense with no layering or texturing.

The machine on display at RAPID prints with up to six different powders, one of which is a sacrificial support material. According to Holcomb, the company has been seeing a lot of interest in from clients researching bond diffusion in multi-material applications. We do a lot of hard-facing copper alloys, as well as Inconel and stainless steels, he says. The next phase is doing functional gradients: being able to shift from one material to another in a single layer.

Grid Logic uses a modified slicer software to create its own toolpaths. All the engineering, all the design, all the building and fabrication of the printer is all done in-house, Holcomb says. If you come to us with a part, well figure out the recipe and how to make it work, even vertically integrate a system for you.

The way I frame this is that its the difference between a propeller airplane and a jet airplane, says Drew Padnick, president of Fugo Precision. Were the jet airplane.

The jet airplane to which Padnick refers is the Fugo Model A, which his company claims to be the worlds first centrifugal 3D printer. Its a bold analogy, but Padnick contends its also an apt one.

[The Fugo A is] faster, its more precise, it has fewer mechanical parts that were moving, he says. Propeller engines were phased out when jet engines came in for very similar reasons.

Looking at the layout of the Model A, the concept of a centrifugal 3D printer quickly becomes clear. The build envelope is unusually oblong at 50 inches by 8 inches by 5 inches, but thats because its wrapped around the inside of the machine to form a hollow cylinder.

This thing spins between 1,500 and 3,000 RPM while the material enters the chamber from underneath, Padnick explains. Were using 20 lasers, which drop into the chamber from above to print the material. If you think of it like that carnival ride the Gravitron thats a good way to visualize whats happening to the material.

As a result, Fugo claims it can achieve layerless 3D prints with 30-micron accuracy at 10 times the speed of traditional stereolithography using a comparably diverse range of photopolymers. In addition, the Model A incorporates post-processing so that parts can be printed, washed, dried and post-cured in the same machine.

Since the advent of SLA and DLP technology, the single greatest problem with these printers has been the need for a mechanical means to spread the infinitely thin layers. With the Fugo Model A, we have solved this problem as our technology does not use any mechanical means to create layers during printing, said Sasha Shkolns, Fugo Precision CTO in a press release.

One last point worth noting about the Model A: We havent tested this, Padnick admits, but the science holds: we can print in outer space. Because were essentially creating our own gravity, we can print at low- and zero-G.

Although those arent first applications the company is targeting with the Model A, they suggest that more unconventional approaches may be the key to bringing additive manufacturing to a wider array of terrestrial environments and applications.

More:

Two new 3D printing technologies you should be watching - ENGINEERING.com

Read More..

Stout students present industry prototypes as part of engineering projects – Leader-Telegram

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Go here to read the rest:

Stout students present industry prototypes as part of engineering projects - Leader-Telegram

Read More..

4 Analysts Have This To Say About Altair Engineering – Benzinga

Ratings for Altair Engineering ALTR were provided by 4 analysts in the past three months, showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.

The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.

In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Altair Engineering, presenting an average target of $92.75, a high estimate of $100.00, and a low estimate of $88.00. This current average has increased by 0.82% from the previous average price target of $92.00.

The standing of Altair Engineering among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.

For valuable insights into Altair Engineering's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.

Stay up to date on Altair Engineering analyst ratings.

Altair Engineering Inc is a provider of enterprise-class engineering software enabling origination of the entire product lifecycle from concept design to in-service operation. The integrated suite of software provided by the company optimizes design performance across multiple disciplines encompassing structures, motion, fluids, thermal management, system modeling, and embedded systems. It operates through two segments: Software which includes the portfolio of software products such as solvers and optimization technology products, modeling and visualization tools, industrial and concept design tools, and others; and Client Engineering Services which provides client engineering services to support customers. Majorityof its revenue comes from the software segment.

Market Capitalization Analysis: The company exhibits a lower market capitalization profile, positioning itself below industry averages. This suggests a smaller scale relative to peers.

Revenue Growth: Altair Engineering's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 31 March, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 4.14%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.

Net Margin: Altair Engineering's net margin is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 9.57%, the company may encounter challenges in effective cost control.

Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 2.24%, the company showcases effective utilization of equity capital.

Return on Assets (ROA): Altair Engineering's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 1.21%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.

Debt Management: Altair Engineering's debt-to-equity ratio surpasses industry norms, standing at 0.44. This suggests the company carries a substantial amount of debt, posing potential financial challenges.

Analysts are specialists within banking and financial systems that typically report for specific stocks or within defined sectors. These people research company financial statements, sit in conference calls and meetings, and speak with relevant insiders to determine what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts will rate each stock once a quarter.

Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.

If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in Benzinga Pro.

This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Visit link:

4 Analysts Have This To Say About Altair Engineering - Benzinga

Read More..

With lizard-like self-amputation, Yale robot detaches arms and fuses at will – Interesting Engineering

Roboticists at Yale Universitys Faboratory have introduced a new, but unlikely capability for soft robots self-amputation and reattachment of limbs.

While certain animals have demonstrated the benefit of shedding their tails to escape predators and form living bridges, this is the first time soft robots have taken a page out of their book.

Interesting Engineering in the past, reported about lizard-inspired structures that mimic autonomy and help buildings from catastrophic collapses.

The research team demonstrated the capabilities of their new soft quadruped robots in a series of videos. In one instance, a robot managed to escape a trap by severing its own limb, showcasing a reversible joint system heated by an electric current. The limb can later be reattached.

At the center of this innovation is a new material, a bicontinuous thermoplastic foam (BTF) that supports a sticky polymer, typically solid, but can be easily melted. This combination allows the joints to be melted, separated, and reattached without losing structural integrity.

In addition to self-amputation, these robots can merge with one another to overcome obstacles. In another of the teams videos, a single crawler robot stands unable to cross a gap between tables.

Three robots then fuse together using their heated joints, to form a larger, more capable unit that can now overcome the gap.

Traditional modular robotics have relied on mechanical connections and magnets, which are inherently rigid, reports Futuro Prossimo. The new combination of the BTF and sticky polymer allows for a flexible, yet strong, connection. Remarkably, this connection is durable and can withstand multiple cycles of detachment and reattachment, and opens up new possibilities for soft robotics.

The researchers at Yale University propose that these techniques could lead to robots capable of radical shape-shifting through changes in mass via autotomy and interfusion. While still in the early stages, this technology could revolutionize how robots interact not just with the environment, but also with each other.

Shape-shifting robots have, for long, been teased as a revolutionary step in robotics. Earlier this year, another team of researchers revealed a genius method to manipulate the molecular properties of liquid crystals through light exposure. According to the team, their method would allow for programmable tools that adapt to stimuli.

If I wanted to make an arbitrary three-dimensional shape, like an arm or a gripper, I would have to align the liquid crystals so that when it is subject to a stimulus, this material restructures spontaneously into those shapes, explained Serra, an associate professor at the University of Southern Denmark.

As roboticists continue to refine these systems, the vision of shape-shifting robots is becoming increasingly tangible. This leap in robotic technology is bringing us closer to a world where robots can seamlessly integrate into unpredictable and unfamiliar environments.

The teams findings, Self-Amputating and Interfusing Machines, were published in the journal Advanced Materials.

NEWSLETTER

Stay up-to-date on engineering, tech, space, and science news with The Blueprint.

Amal Jos Chacko Amal writes code on a typical business day and dreams of clicking pictures of cool buildings and reading a book curled by the fire. He loves anything tech, consumer electronics, photography, cars, chess, football, and F1.

More:

With lizard-like self-amputation, Yale robot detaches arms and fuses at will - Interesting Engineering

Read More..

ST Engineering pushes forward on its hybrid-powered propulsion systems – EDR Magazine

Over two years ago, at the Singapore Airshow, ST Engineering unveiled its Next Generation Light Strike Vehicle (NGLSV) powered by a hybrid system based on a 296 hp Cummins diesel engine coupled to a generator, used to charge batteries that provide power to a 100 kW electric motor. It also provided details of its Next Generation Protected Vehicle (NGPV), which is proposed with a conventional or with a hybrid powerpack.

In Paris ST Engineering showcased the NGPV model in the hybrid version and provided more information on the latter. The diesel engine remains the same Cummins 296 hp of the NGLSV but here the powerpack includes with two electric motors that operate as a single motor, their combined 450 kW output power going on a single gear. According to ST Engineering representatives, this solution was adopted as the two motors are smaller and it is easier to fit them into the vehicle.

The powerpack is fitted at the front; the forward element is the cooling system (painted grey in the model), which has two radiators as it must cool not only the diesel engine but also the two battery packs, which are located at the back, on the sides of the vehicle (painted green). The hybrid ensemble follows, painted blue, while in red we find the auxiliary drive system that drives the engine fan, the hydraulic rear ramp, and the air conditioning system. The NGPV has a 15 km silent drive range, or remain on silent watch for 24 hours, or provide up to 16 kW export power.

The NGPV is a 20 tonnes GVW 44 armoured vehicle with a 15 tonnes curb weight, hence a 5 tonnes payload. It can carry a two-man crew and 10 passengers in the rear compartment, to which they access via the rear ramp. It is 7.3 metres long, 2.6 metres wide and 2.7 metres high, it can travel at a maximum speed of 100 km/h, overcome a 60% gradient, move on a 30% side slope, climb a 400 mm high vertical step, and ford a water obstacle up to 900 mm deep. The NGPV with the hybrid configuration is currently undergoing testing, the Singapore MoD being very interested in hybrid propulsion.

Looking forward, ST Engineering is developing a wholly different hybrid solution, based on electric differentials, each axle including an electric motor, an inverter, and a 3-speed gearbox. While the current motors operate at 400 V, thee-differentials operate at 800 V, which ensures higher performances.

This solution is currently being applied to an 88 armoured vehicle, the diesel engine with generator installed to reload batteries providing 600 hp. Each axle will provide 230 kW, which means that the vehicle will have a lot of excess power and will be able to operate even if two e-axles will fail. The vehicle is wholly new, the driver and commander at the front driving and observing the surroundings through a camera-based system with extremely low latency.

ST Engineering plans starting tests with the new 88 hybrid armoured personnel carrier in Q1 2025.

Photos by P. Valpolini

View post:

ST Engineering pushes forward on its hybrid-powered propulsion systems - EDR Magazine

Read More..

Flying in helicopters is safer than you might think an aerospace engineer explains the technology and training that make it so – The Conversation

Helicopters draw a lot of attention with their almost magical ability to hover, fly in any direction and operate without runways. They also help save many lives, often dramatically, with their extensive use in all-weather military missions, ambulance duties and search-and-rescue roles.

When things go wrong, dramatic images and news stories about helicopter accidents grab the publics attention. This is especially true when high-profile celebrities or government officials are involved.

However, modern rotorcraft are safe. Each year, the U.S. commercial helicopter industry flies about 3 million flight hours. There were 0.77 fatal accidents per 100,000 flight hours on average from 2018 to 2022. In comparison, general aviation, which refers to small fixed-wing aircraft and not jetliners, averaged 0.88 fatal accidents per 100,000 flight hours over the same period.

As an aeronautical engineer who specializes in rotorcraft and the director of a national vertical lift center of excellence, I have observed academic, government and industry efforts to improve helicopter safety. A lot of technology and training have gone into making helicopters safe.

Rotary-wing aircraft were first developed over a century ago. The first that went into mass production was the autogiro, developed in 1923 by Juan de la Cierva in Spain. The pinwheel-like nature of the main lifting rotor avoided the dangers of stalling, which wrecked so many fixed-wing aircraft during that era. Stalling is when the angle of an airplanes wings relative to the airflow is too great, causing the plane to lose lift.

Within 15 years, the first true helicopters with powered rotors capable of hovering, low-speed flight and safe descent in the event of engine failure were in the air in both Europe and the United States. Large-scale military and commercial production began just a few years later during the World War II.

Todays helicopter operations are anchored on three main principles: comprehensive vehicle design, testing and manufacturing; well-trained flight crews; and thorough maintenance practices. Advanced technology plays a vital role in each of these pillars of helicopter safety.

Helicopter safety begins with the fundamental capability of large-diameter rotors that can auto-rotate in the event of engine failure. With the engine off, the rotors spin freely, slowing the helicopters decent and allowing parachute-like controlled landing. Reliable powertrains engines, gear boxes and driveshafts long-lived blades and low-vibration airframes have also paved the way for safer flights.

Additionally, advanced autopilot and computer-controlled or assisted flight controls, terrain-avoidance radar and rotor blade deicing systems that enable all-weather flight have become common on modern helicopters. Decades of basic and applied research conducted in university, government and industry laboratories has yielded many advanced technologies. Todays helicopters typically have radar- and lidar-based collision avoidance systems, comprehensive digital terrain mapping databases and adaptive controls that help the pilot feel differences depending on flight conditions and aircraft characteristics such as payload.

Rotorcraft do require specialized pilot training to master. Pilots often train on fixed-wing aircraft before transitioning to rotary-wing vehicles, much as you might learn to ride a bicycle before taking on a unicycle. Pilots spend many additional hours or even years of flight instruction to earn a helicopter license.

Rotorcraft inherently feature more moving parts than fixed-wing aircraft, which makes careful design of bearings, gearboxes, shock absorbers, lubrication systems and other mechanical components critical. As with pilots, helicopter mechanics need additional training hours and skill sets.

Indeed, for some complex military and rescue missions, mechanics fly along as integral members of the flight crew. These flight mechanics closely monitor critical systems using onboard temperature, vibration, noise and metal chip sensors, and can even troubleshoot and repair many mechanical, electrical and digital issues that arise.

Advanced sensors and computer software make maintaining helicopters quicker and more thorough. Additionally, advanced design and manufacturing methods for rugged composite materials and specialized flexible polymers have dramatically improved the durability of dynamic components such as blades and rotors.

Even with all the advanced design, training and technology in place, accidents happen. The vast majority involve a complex chain of events. Pilot or mechanic error, typically associated with unusual circumstances, is a primary cause of many crashes.

Bad weather often contributes. Many essential flight operations such as search and rescue, firefighting and military transport necessarily occur in sandy, snowy, smoky or stormy environments. These edge of the envelope conditions raise the risk factor, despite the best technology and training doctrines. Even the intense and realistic training exercises for these missions can be inherently more dangerous than standard flight.

New technologies continue to improve flight safety under these difficult conditions. These include more effective, reliable and lower power rotor blade deicing or anti-icing systems; improved weather forecasting models; and even onboard ice-cloud detection systems. Researchers are developing artificial intelligence-enabled expert systems that help pilots decide when and if its safe to fly.

I expect advanced technologies to enable reliability and safety statistics to continue to improve, and operating costs to drop, as thousands of aerospace engineers around the world bring life-saving, time-saving and security-enhancing improvements to these remarkable vehicles.

Excerpt from:

Flying in helicopters is safer than you might think an aerospace engineer explains the technology and training that make it so - The Conversation

Read More..

Systematic optimization of prime editing for the efficient functional correction of CFTR F508del in human airway epithelial cells – Nature.com

Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149157 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPRCas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824844 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Chen, P. J. & Liu, D. R. Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 161177 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Newby, G. A. & Liu, D. R. In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing. Mol. Ther. 29, 31073124 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Davis, J. R. et al. Efficient prime editing in mouse brain, liver and heart with dual AAVs. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01758-z (2023).

Liu, Y. et al. Efficient generation of mouse models with the prime editing system. Cell Discov. 6, 27 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Schene, I. F. et al. Prime editing for functional repair in patient-derived disease models. Nat. Commun. 11, 5352 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Geurts, M. H. et al. Evaluating CRISPR-based prime editing for cancer modeling and CFTR repair in organoids. Life Sci. Alliance 4, e202000940 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Park, S.-J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in mouse cells and embryos using an enhanced prime editor. Genome Biol. 22, 170 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gao, P. et al. Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Biol. 22, 83 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lin, J. et al. Modeling a cataract disorder in mice with prime editing. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 25, 494501 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Habib, O., Habib, G., Hwang, G.-H. & Bae, S. Comprehensive analysis of prime editing outcomes in human embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 11871197 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gao, R. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of prime editing guide RNAindependent off-target effects by prime editors. CRISPR J. 5, 276293 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liang, S.-Q. et al. Genome-wide profiling of prime editor off-target sites in vitro and in vivo using PE-tag. Nat. Methods 20, 898907 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fiumara, M. et al. Genotoxic effects of base and prime editing in human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01915-4 (2023).

Jin, S. et al. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 12921299 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kim, D. Y., Moon, S. B., Ko, J.-H., Kim, Y.-S. & Kim, D. Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 1057610589 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 770788 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPRCas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765771 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Song, Y. et al. Large-fragment deletions induced by Cas9 cleavage while not in the BEs system. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 21, 523526 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Haapaniemi, E., Botla, S., Persson, J., Schmierer, B. & Taipale, J. CRISPRCas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response. Nat. Med. 24, 927930 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Enache, O. M. et al. Cas9 activates the p53 pathway and selects for p53-inactivating mutations. Nat. Genet. 52, 662668 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ihry, R. J. et al. p53 inhibits CRISPRCas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med. 24, 939946 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tao, J., Wang, Q., Mendez-Dorantes, C., Burns, K. H. & Chiarle, R. Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites. Nat. Commun. 13, 3685 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Alanis-Lobato, G. et al. Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9edited early human embryos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2004832117 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zuccaro, M. V. et al. Allele-specific chromosome removal after Cas9 cleavage in human embryos. Cell 183, 16501664.e15 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Leibowitz, M. L. et al. Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPRCas9 genome editing. Nat. Genet. 53, 895905 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cullot, G. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations. Nat. Commun. 10, 1136 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

She, K. et al. Dual-AAV split prime editor corrects the mutation and phenotype in mice with inherited retinal degeneration. Sig. Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 112 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Everette, K. A. et al. Ex vivo prime editing of patient haematopoietic stem cells rescues sickle-cell disease phenotypes after engraftment in mice. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 616628 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, C. et al. In vivo HSC prime editing rescues sickle cell disease in a mouse model. Blood https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022018252 (2023).

Zhi, S. et al. Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing. Mol.Ther. 30, 283294 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jang, H. et al. Application of prime editing to the correction of mutations and phenotypes in adult mice with liver and eye diseases. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 181194 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Doman, J. L. et al. Phage-assisted evolution and protein engineering yield compact, efficient prime editors. Cell 186, 39834002.e26 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zheng, C. et al. A flexible split prime editor using truncated reverse transcriptase improves dual-AAV delivery in mouse liver. Mol. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.01.005 (2022).

Bck, D. et al. In vivo prime editing of a metabolic liver disease in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabl9238 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gao, Z. et al. A truncated reverse transcriptase enhances prime editing by split AAV vectors. Mol. Ther. 30, 29422951 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Duffield, J. et al. Prime editing precisely corrects prevalent pathogenic mutations causing glycogen storage disease type 1b (GSD1b). Paper presented at the 30th Annual Congress of the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy, Brussels, 27 October 2023 (2023).

Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01039-7 (2021).

Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 56355652.e29 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Marshall, B. et al. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry: 2021 Annual Data Report (Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, 2022).

Google Scholar

Guo, J., Garratt, A. & Hill, A. Worldwide rates of diagnosis and effective treatment for cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 21, 456462 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

OSullivan, B. P. & Freedman, S. D. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 373, 18911904 (2009).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Elborn, J. S. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 388, 25192531 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sanders, D. B. & Fink, A. K. Background and epidemiology. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 63, 567584 (2016).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rowe, S. M., Miller, S. & Sorscher, E. J. Cystic fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 19922001 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Quinton, P. M. Cystic fibrosis: impaired bicarbonate secretion and mucoviscidosis. Lancet 372, 415417 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Castellani, C. CFTR2: how will it help care? Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 14, 25 (2013).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Dalemans, W. et al. Altered chloride ion channel kinetics associated with the F508 cystic fibrosis mutation. Nature 354, 526528 (1991).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lukacs, G. L. et al. The delta F508 mutation decreases the stability of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in the plasma membrane. Determination of functional half-lives on transfected cells. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2159221598 (1993).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Cheng, S. H. et al. Defective intracellular transport and processing of CFTR is the molecular basis of most cystic fibrosis. Cell 63, 827834 (1990).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Denning, G. M. et al. Processing of mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is temperature-sensitive. Nature 358, 761764 (1992).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

View original post here:

Systematic optimization of prime editing for the efficient functional correction of CFTR F508del in human airway epithelial cells - Nature.com

Read More..

Open-TeleVision: Tech boosts robotic control, integrates human intuition with VR – Interesting Engineering

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) have unveiled an innovative, open-source system dubbed Open-TeleVision.

While modern developments have provided researchers with large-scale real-robot data, actuation and perception remain a challenge, reports The Robot Report.

Actuation involves controlling the robots joints to mimic operator movement. Traditional technology prevents operators from gaining a clear view of the task space. This is a huge limitation in situations where the task is detailed and calls for intuitive views.

The Open-TeleVision system aims to solve these problems by providing operators with a stereoscopic view of the robots surroundings while mirroring their own arm and hand movements. The teleoperation system offers a more intuitive way to control robots from afar.

While companies such as Boston Dynamics have showcased autonomous robots more impressive than ever, these systems still struggle to adapt and solve problems creatively areas where human intelligence thrives.

At the heart of Open-TeleVision is a VR-based interface that streams the operators hand, head, and wrist movements to a server. This server then translates these human poses into robot joint positions which control the machine. A single active stereo RGB camera mounted to the robots head ensures constant sync with the operators head movements.

The system creates an immersive experience as if the operators mind is transmitted to a robot embodiment, the researchers told VentureBeat.

Our intuition and years of real-world experience have blessed us with the ability to adapt to new and unfamiliar situations. Using our creativity to solve problems adds another benefit.

The research team believes that such a human-centered approach to robotics could prove to be invaluable. This is especially the case in scenarios that require nuance or ethical decision-making.

Open-TeleVision could transform a wide range of industries and scenarios. Imagine human-controlled robots navigating dangerous environments while first responders remain safe, responding to disasters. Additionally, skilled surgeons would be able to perform delicate procedures from anywhere in the world, potentially saving more human lives.

According to VentureBeat, the system could benefits even extend beyond the Earths atmosphere. Space missions would be free from communication delays that have long plagued missions if astronauts on Earth could control robots on distant planets.

The research team demonstrated the Open-TeleVision systems prowess over long distances by having an MIT-based team member control a robot located at UCSD. More tests were performed using two humanoid robots: a Unitree H1, and a Fourier GR1, reports The Robot Report.

Despite all its promise, several obstacles remain to be ironed out. The research team stressed the importance of further development, particularly in ensuring high-bandwidth connections. This would tackle issues like latency in long-distance communications.

Additionally, the team is also exploring blending their human-control system with AI assistance. They believe that a hybrid system would offer the best of both worlds human decision-making supplemented by AIs quick processing capabilities.

The teams findings were published in the pre-print archive, arXiv.

NEWSLETTER

Stay up-to-date on engineering, tech, space, and science news with The Blueprint.

Amal Jos Chacko Amal writes code on a typical business day and dreams of clicking pictures of cool buildings and reading a book curled by the fire. He loves anything tech, consumer electronics, photography, cars, chess, football, and F1.

More here:

Open-TeleVision: Tech boosts robotic control, integrates human intuition with VR - Interesting Engineering

Read More..