Page 2,225«..1020..2,2242,2252,2262,227..2,2302,240..»

Dont Think Rogan Can Be Canceled- Jordan Peterson Thunderously Defends Joe Rogan Amid Spotify Controversy – EssentiallySports

Joe Rogan is a revolutionary figure in the podcasting domain. Whatever he does, or says, creates a massive social impact with his large fan following. Being famous has its perks, obviously. But it also makes one susceptible to scrutiny.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Being the outspoken character Rogan is, he doesnt hold back from making his opinions heard. His podcast, the Joe Rogan Experience, has been at the helm of many controversies in the past.

Recently, audio-sharing platform Spotify deleted over a hundred episodes of his podcast which was accused of spreading misinformation. This invited many reactions from various social commentators, some of whom supported the iconic UFC commentator. Renowned psychologist Jordan Peterson, too, defended Rogan and said it would be a mistake for Spotify to let him go.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Peterson claimed, As long as he is careful like he is. I dont think Rogan can be canceled. So even if Spotify dumps him its like whos dumping who here. Rogan, hes on Spotify, it is not necessarily. Spotify might be on Rogan, its not so clear,he added.

WATCH THIS STORY: Top five most viewed episodes of the Joe Rogan Experience

He laid down the possible outcome of Spotify de-platforming Rogan. He explained, So whats gonna happen? They kick him off? Well, he will just have another platform like tomorrow and he will have all the money Spotify gave him which was actually quite a lot of money.

Rogan, who is a popular podcast host, an entrepreneur, and an integral part of the UFC commentator team, enjoys a luxurious lifestyle. He never shies from following his heart and doing things that please him.

Apart from being a vocal gun-rights activist, Rogan also has a knack for possessing firearms. He even called guns the best martial arts on the Lex Fridman podcast.

Rogan himself owns thousands of dollars worth of guns and also likes to learn the art of using them. In an Instagram post, Rogan shared a video of him at a shooting range, enjoying a shooting drill.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

He captioned the video, I learned a lot today, and it really made me appreciate how difficult it is to properly handle a gun.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What is your take on the recent Joe Rogan controversy?

Enjoyed reading this article? Download our exclusive app to get 24x7 coverage, latest memes and social media banter. Click here to download.

Read the original post:
Dont Think Rogan Can Be Canceled- Jordan Peterson Thunderously Defends Joe Rogan Amid Spotify Controversy - EssentiallySports

Read More..

Viral TikTok: Best years with our kids aren’t over after they turn 4 – Insider

Five years ago, I was a mom to a newborn and a 2-year-old. I struggled with postpartum depression, sleep deprivation, and was worn out from being needed all the time.

I felt guilty that I found it so hard, and I dreamed of a time when it wouldn't be.

When people said things like, "Enjoy every moment, it goes by fast," it felt like a punch to the gut.

In a recent viral video on TikTok, Jordan Peterson a controversial psychologist, author, YouTube personality, and fathers'-rights advocate says in a voice-over: "You have little kids for four years, and if you miss it, it's done."

That's exactly what I struggled with, but now that my kids are older, I want other moms who are struggling like I did to know that our kids are fun past their 4th birthday.

When my kids were little, I felt guilty for wanting time away from them. I felt shamed by some moms with older kids who ignored my struggles and instead told me, "It'll be over before you know it."

Every day seemed to drag. I wanted to create magical moments for my kids but struggled to do that through my depression and exhaustion.

Now that my kids are 5 and 7, I get to sit at the dinner table and talk and laugh at their jokes. I get a front-row seat to their ideas, hopes, and dreams. They can communicate their needs more effectively and they can keep up on family hikes. They are so much more independent and a joy to be around.

Because of all this, I felt compelled to create my own version of the Peterson video on TikTok. I wanted to give a different perspective to parents who might be struggling as I did in the early years.

This is the text I wrote to go with the video:"You have little kids for four years.And if you miss it Well, you won't miss it, because chances are you're with those babies all day and all night and you know little else in those years.

You have sacrificed your time, your body, your career, your energy, and likely your mental health to create a loving and full life for them.

Of course, you want to enjoy as many moments as possible, but the reality is, those four years are some of the hardest, exhausting, patience-testing years, and sometimes you're just surviving.

You're already acutely aware of how precious it is and constantly reminded how fast it goes. You already feel the pressure to make it great and feel guilty for the things you do and don't do.

Of course, you want to make the best of it, but when you lack sleep and space for yourself, it makes it incredibly difficult to soak in.

And while you might look back and miss those little years and mourn what you were not able to fully experience due to the stresses of it all, you will remember the beauty of it all without the sheer exhaustion.

And you'll know you did your very best, despite how hard it was. And you'll have so many more years to look forward to with them. It doesn't end after 4."

Within minutes of hitting "post," I started getting thousands of responses from moms around the world thanking me and sharing how triggered the original video made them feel: shame, guilt, and pressure.

As a mom, I want to be seen, to be heard, and to be validated when I say, "This is hard." I worry that I am not enough, no matter how hard I try. Raising kids is incredibly difficult, but being made to feel like you've lost your chance if you don't nail it in the first four years makes it even harder. I needed something different than the "you'll miss it" narrative.

I needed support, not more pressure.

Libby Ward is an anti-mom-shamer and mental-health advocate on a mission to change the narrative of what it means to be a "good mom." Known as the "honest mom" to her social-media community, she is a content creator, public speaker, and storyteller breaking cycles of all kinds, one piece of content at a time.

Read more:
Viral TikTok: Best years with our kids aren't over after they turn 4 - Insider

Read More..

Why are Joe Rogan, Elon Musk and Russell Brand Trending together? – EssentiallySports

The controversy surrounding Joe Rogan is firmly in the past, but it looks like something has triggered things once again. Strangely enough, the UFC icon was once again trending on Twitter alongside fellow comedian Russell Brand, and entrepreneur Elon Musk.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The trio became the most talked-about celebs on the platform, with no concrete reason behind them.

All three individuals are outspoken and they never shy away from speaking exactly what is on their mind. Sometimes it can irk fans, and certain viewers which have time and time again proved to create problems.

However, it doesnt seem like the negative reception from the internet is having any effect on them at all. Rogan has returned back to hosting his shows on a routine basis and has invited many notable guests from MrBeast to Indias spiritual yogi, Sadhguru.

Elon Musk offered his thoughts on the matter and stated that mainstream media is wrong about comedian, Russell Brand. He also claimed that he found his podcast to be insightful, balanced as he went through his videos.

Another prominent figure in Jordan B. Peterson also addressed the matter and shared his own thoughts on the matter. He disagreed with the general perception and raised a question for the fans to answer.

Rogans friendship with Elon Musk has only flourished tenfolds since he appeared on his podcast the first time back in 2018. Since then, Musk has appeared on the JRE podcast again, which clearly states that the two enjoy a great bond.

Watch This Story: Five Times Dan Hooker Obliterated His Opponents in the Octagon

Time and time again, Rogan has been spotted to be in the company of the billionaire. Musk even jumped to his defense, despite the risk of inviting more criticism and unnecessary attention.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Musk shared a rather hilarious tweet in response to Spotifys decision not to remove Rogan from the platform. The meme contained a picture of popular rock musician Neil Young with a message. It is quite clear that no matter what happens in the world, Musk will always stand by his friend and isnt scared of sharing what he feels.

What are your thoughts about the latest Twitter trend?

Enjoyed reading this article? Download our exclusive app to get 24x7 coverage, latest memes and social media banter. Click here to download.

Read the original:
Why are Joe Rogan, Elon Musk and Russell Brand Trending together? - EssentiallySports

Read More..

Conservatives are part of the problem – The Christian Post

By Samuel Sey, Op-ed contributor | Saturday, March 19, 2022Reuters/Victor Ruiz Garcia

Most conservatives support Floridas so-called Dont Say Gay Bill. However, many of these supposed conservatives apparently support the bill for the wrong reasons.

Many conservatives do not care about protecting children from LGBTQ indoctrination, they only care about protecting children from leftist indoctrination.

Most conservatives today are heading toward the same direction as liberals and leftists theyre simply progressing at a slower speed.

Christless conservatives hate leftism, not sin. We Christians shouldnt forget that.

They are generally our political allies, but they are not our philosophical allies. Jesus said: Whoever is not with me is against me (Matthew 12:30).

That applies to conservatives too. Leftists arent the only people who are against Jesus. Christless conservatives are against Jesus too. Therefore, Christless conservatives have more in common with leftists than they have with Christians.

So although leftists are a bigger threat to our society, Christless conservatives arent the solution. Actually, they are part of the problem.

Yesterday, Dave Rubin and the man he calls his husband announced theyre fathers of two children through surrogate mothers. Many supposed conservatives, including commentators and media outlets like Candace Owens,Prager University andThe Blaze shared their support.

If youre unfamiliar with Dave Rubin, he is a political commentator on his talk show, "The Rubin Report." He occasionally refers to himself as a conservative, but he mostly describes himself as a classical liberal.

I actually admire Dave Rubin a lot. Imentioned "The Rubin Report" in an article about my top 10 favorite podcasts two years ago. In that article, I said: Dave Rubin is the most interesting podcaster I follow.

His interviews with Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Larry Elder, Douglas Murray and many more have been so helpful to me. His first interviews with Ben Shapiro and Larry Elder especially shaped a lot of my thinking on racial issues. The interviews encouraged me to do further research research that strengthened my blog. Truly, without "The Rubin Report," my blog would be significantly weaker.

Nevertheless, Dave Rubin and the conservatives who support his announcement are part of the problem in our society.

In between their tweets about how LGBTQ indoctrination in public schools harm children, many supposed conservatives tweeted in support of Dave Rubin harming children.

Yes, Dave Rubin and the man he calls his husband are harming their children. I do not take any pleasure in saying that. But its true.

Just as children are a blessing to fathers and mothers, fathers and mothers are a blessing to children. Its therefore harmful to remove that blessing from children through homosexual parenting.

As Katy Faust explains in her must-read book,Them Before Us, homosexual parenting deliberately violates a childs right to a father and mother, with devastating consequences.

We shouldnt have to explain this to conservatives. After all, many of the conservatives supporting Dave Rubin and his partners homosexual parenting are some of the people who rightly blame racial disparities on fatherlessness in black families.

These hypocritical conservatives complain about why leftists do not care about fatherlessness in black families, but they apparently havent asked themselves why they do not care about Dave Rubins children being motherless.

They support homosexual marriages and homosexual parenting, and yet they complain about how gender theory and transgenderism have become so popular without acknowledging that acceptance of homosexual marriages and homosexual parenting fosters acceptance of gender theory and transgenderism.

Also, we conservatives have spent the last two years sharing our concerns about how masks harm children. And yet, we support children being harmed by homosexual parenting?

Of course, children shouldnt be forced to wear masks. But isnt homosexual parenting significantly more harmful than a mask?

Nevertheless, when Pete Buttigieg and his partner announced last year that theyre fathers of twins, they were criticized by many of the conservatives who are supporting Dave Rubin and his partner today.

Apparently, what makes Buttigiegs announcement harmful for society, and makes Rubins announcement helpful for society is their political affiliations.

Many conservatives are only committed to conserving their own interests, nothing more. Thats why just as liberals have regressed into leftists, most conservatives have regressed into liberals.

So dont be surprised when most conservatives support gender theory, transgenderism and public schools indoctrinating children with LGBTQ ideology in a few years.

Most conservatives arent conservatives at all.

Thats why Matt Schlapp, the president of the Conservative Political Action Conference the biggest conservative conference in America shared a tweetin support of transgenderism a few weeks ago. Thats why he alsoadmittedto removing pro-life speakers from the conference because he believes they are unnecessary.

Many conservatives are more interested in being on the right side of history than being right with God.

Until that changes, Christless conservatives will always be part of the problem, not the solution.

Originally published at Slow to Write.

Samuel Sey is a Ghanaian-Canadian who lives in Brampton, a city just outside of Toronto. He is committed to addressing racial, cultural, and political issues with biblical theology, and always attempts to be quick to listen and slow to speak.

See the article here:
Conservatives are part of the problem - The Christian Post

Read More..

Conservative party-linked Facebook page, Canada Proud, a major source of climate disinformation – NationofChange

As Russian forces advanced towards Kyiv, Canadas oil and gas industry and its supporters responded with a self-serving narrative: the Ukraine crisis means Canada must accelerate its production of fossil fuels.

Leading the charge is Canada Proud, a right-wing Facebook page with close ties to the Conservative Party, which made post after post in the early days of the invasion urging the country to export more hydrocarbons to Europe.

The world is enriching Vladimir Putin when they buy his oil and gas, it explained in one to its nearly 400,000 followers. Shouldnt the world be buying Canadian oil and gas instead?

The political circumstances may be novel, but this is merely the latest variation on a message that Canada Proud has pushed online for years: that we need to remove as many restrictions as possible on the production, transport and export of fossil fuels.

New research shows that Canada Proud is incredibly effective at spreading that message.

The Ontario-based group founded by Jeff Ballingall, a paid strategist for former Conservative leader Erin OToole, punches far above its weight on social media when it comes to global heating, posting content dismissive of climate action that regularly outperforms national environmental groups and rivals the reach of mainstream media.

Thats according to a newly published study from Simon Fraser University communications professor Shane Gunster, who calculated that Facebook posts from Canada Proud (along with a related page called Ontario Proud) were shared on average 750 times each in 2020, a level of engagement ten times higher than climate posts from the David Suzuki Foundation and Greenpeace Canada.

The Proud network got nearly 118,000 engagements for its climate posts during that period, surpassing the almost 107,000 engagements for climate content on Facebook from Bell Media/CTV, one of the countrys top media outlets.

The Proud traffic is even more striking considering its engagements came from just 48 Facebook posts, compared to 290 posts from Bell Media/CTV.

They are the most effective group at generating action for anti-climate action material, Gunster told DeSmog. Theyre able to drive massive amounts of engagement.

Canada Proud didnt respond to an interview request from DeSmog.

The Facebook pages primary mission is to antagonize Justin Trudeau. Visit Canada Prouds feed on any given day and you are likely to see memes referring to the Liberal prime minister as a hypocrite, political lightweight or dangerous tyrant. We are reaching millions of Canadians every week with our anti-Trudeau message, Canada Proud explained in a recent email to supporters.

In addition to its national work attacking Trudeau and promoting oil and gas, the Canada Proud network is making forays into municipal politics with anonymous Facebook pages in B.C., Ontario and Quebec, according to a recent investigation in Canadas National Observer.

The groups climate posts add an environmental twist. In mid-February, Canada Proud shared several posts referencing an RCMP statement saying that 20 people with axes attacked a worksite for the Coastal GasLink pipeline in northwest British Columbia. Somehow this was the prime ministers fault. Lets expose Justin Trudeaus hypocrisy and double standards, said a Canada Proud post about the attacks.

Another post blamed progressive policymakers for the violence.

This extremism is the direct result of the inflammatory rhetoric of irresponsible politicians and fanatical activists like David Suzuki, said one post, which was reposted from a pro-oil and gas Facebook page called Debunk Inc.

There is no evidence to support this claim, given that the RCMP hasnt publicly identified any suspects in the attack or announced any arrests.

But Canada Proud is not a neutral observer when it comes to projects like Coastal GasLink.

The group launched three paid posts in late January supporting the project, a 670-kilometre pipeline that would supply gas to an export facility on B.C.s west coast.

Environmentalists claim that by opposing the Coastal GasLink pipeline, they are supporting local Indigenous people, reads the post. They will never tell you that ALL of the elected band councils along the pipelines route support the project.

Facebook analytics show that Canada Proud spent up to $4,000 promoting that message, which reached an estimated audience size of over one million people, generating more than a million impressions.

Its true that 20 elected band councils along the pipelines route have signed agreements supporting the Coastal GasLink project. But the reality is not as cut and dry as Canada Proud is making it seem. Band councils are tasked with representing reserves chronically underfunded by the Canadian government. Poverty can be rampant, and that complicates meaningful consent.

Making a deal with a large oil and gas pipeline company is sometimes the only way elected First Nations leaders can gain resources and jobs for their citizens. Meanwhile, hereditary chiefs that represent the much larger traditional territories of the Wetsuweten are staunchly opposed to the $6 billion pipeline.

Its disingenuous to give the impression that hordes of Indigenous people are cheering it on, Clifford Atleo, a Tsimshian and Nuu-chah-nulthscholar at Simon Fraser University who focuses on Indigenous governance, told DeSmog. I dont think thats a realistic assessment of whats actually going on.

Another recent paid post from Canada Proud, which resulted in as many as 700,000 Facebook impressions, claims that the Coastal GasLink pipeline would reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by outcompeting made-in-China coal energy.

Its source for that statement was an article created by the Canadian Energy Centre, a pro-oil and gas website funded by the Alberta government, which claimed that Coastal GasLink will result in climate gains equivalent to shutting down several dozen coal plants.

Actual climate experts disagree. Methane emissions are likely to give natural gas a climate footprint at least as large as coal, if not higher, Robert Howarth, an Earth systems scientist at Cornell University whos studied the gas industry extensively, told DeSmog.

Methane stays in the atmosphere less time than carbon dioxide, but its warming power is 25 times higher. Worryingly, research from last year suggests that the amount of methane leaking from oil and gas operations in B.C. is up to 2.2 times higher than current federal estimates.

That is not information that Canada Prouds 392,000 followers are likely to see when encountering a climate post created by the group. Instead, those followers get hit with content designed to make them distrust efforts to fix climate change, such as a recent Jordan Peterson interview attacking the naivety of climate activists.

These posts can be easily debunked by experts, but by that point theyve already reached potentially millions of Canadians, priming an online constituency to passionately defend the oil and gas industryor to view a geopolitical crisis in Ukraine as an opportunity to drill for more gas in Canada. Its fairly easy to write it off as a joke, Gunster said of the disinformation given a platform by Canada Proud. But it can end up being extremely effective.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

Continued here:
Conservative party-linked Facebook page, Canada Proud, a major source of climate disinformation - NationofChange

Read More..

Patrick Peterson Provides Update on Future with Vikings – VikingsTerritory.com

Patrick Peterson

Leave the decision up to him, and cornerback Patrick Peterson wants to return to the Minnesota Vikings for the 2022 season.

But the teams new leadership has to ask first.

Peterson has reiterated a couple of times this offseason his longing to remain with the Vikings after a relatively successful 2021 campaign. He tabulated a 63.0 grade from Pro Football Focus last season, acting as the most consistent cornerback on the roster. Cameron Dantzler was in the Mike Zimmer doghouse for a couple of months, Bashaud Breeland was erratic (in more ways than one), Mackensie Alexander struggled, and Jeff Gladney was cut before the season began.

On his podcast this week, Peterson said on his future with the Vikings:

I stand where I stood in December. I loved everything about Minnesota. At the end of the day, the balls in their court now if they want me back.

So, it sounds like Minnesota basically needs to pick up the phone, assuming it wants the soon-to-be 32-year-old cornerback back in 2022.

Minnesota should absolutely want Peterson back because the CB room as of early March is skimpy. The depth chart consists of Cameron Dantzler, Kris Boyd, and Harrison Hand. Outside of Dantzler if he continues to develop at his current pace that is not a fieldable batch of cornerbacks in the modern NFL.

As a result, most mocks draft predict the Vikings select a cornerback like Ahmad Gardner or Derek Stingley Jr. in Aprils draft. The selection of either of those men would blend best player available and team need for Minnesota with the 12th overall pick.

Peterson made humongous news when he signed with the Vikings in 2021 on Saint Patricks Day, no less as no fans or pundits even realized he was on the teams radar or vice-versa. However, Peterson sought to play for former coach Mike Zimmer, so the team readily obliged.

Now, Kevin OConnell is in charge, an offensive-minded coach. OConnell hired Ed Donatell to lead the defense in 2022, shifting to a 3-4 scheme after decades of 4-3 systems for the Vikings.

Finally, on Tuesday, the Vikings signed linebacker Jordan Hicks from you guessed it the Arizona Cardinals, Petersons old stomping grounds. The two played together for a couple of seasons in the desert. That move cannot hurt the realism of Peterson re-joining the Vikings.

Plus, there are Chander-Jones-to-Minnesota rumors, as well.

Peterson also mentioned on his show other teams have inquired about his free agency.

Dustin Baker is a political scientist who graduated from the University of Minnesota in 2007. His YouTube Channel, VikesNow, debuts in March 2022. He hosts a podcast with Bryant McKinnie, which airs every Wednesday with Raun Sawh and Sally from Minneapolis. His Viking fandom dates back to 1996. Listed guilty pleasures: Peanut Butter Ice Cream, The Sopranos, and The Doors (the band).

Read more here:
Patrick Peterson Provides Update on Future with Vikings - VikingsTerritory.com

Read More..

People for Portland accused of violating Oregon election laws – The Spokesman Review

A well-funded and largely anonymous advocacy group thats repeatedly pummeled Portland-area leaders over trash, crime and homelessness faces accusations of illegal politicking and running afoul of Oregon election laws.

People for Portland targeted a clearly identified candidate for office in a recent online ad against local elected leaders including Metro President Lynn Peterson, alleges a union thats endorsed her.

Under Oregon campaign finance laws, any entity that spends at least $250 to campaign for or against a candidate in Oregon must register with the state and disclose such spending as well as its sources of money.

If state election officials side with the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 555, which lodged the complaint, People for Portland could have to disclose who contributed to its $1 million-plus advertising and lobbying budget.

A few donors including Columbia Sportswear CEO Tim Boyle and real estate moguls Jordan Schnitzer and Greg Goodman have acknowledged chipping in.

But the groups two veteran political strategists, Kevin Looper and Dan Lavey, have kept the full list a closely guarded secret.

The paid ad in question shows an image of Peterson, who is seeking re-election in May, alongside other local officeholders with the word FAILING in large red letters printed on a mock report card above their heads.

Titled Local politicians fail, the ad directs individuals to People for Portlands website to view the report cards results as well as give area leaders a letter grade of their own.

Michael Selvaggio, lobbyist for the food and commercial workers union, filed an official complaint Tuesday with the Oregon Secretary of States Office, according to a copy obtained by the Oregonian through a public records request.

The complaint claims the ad is a clear and unambiguous suggestion that voters should oppose Petersons re-election.

What it boils down to is that Oregon law is very clear on what the line is between simply trying to raise an issue of public concern versus politicking, Selvaggio said in an interview Friday.

Im not saying they cant speak their mind, Selvaggio continued. They just need to show us where the money is coming from and who is behind it.

That is the philosophy that underlies Oregons unusual campaign finance system, which allows unlimited donations and expenditures but requires timely and detailed disclosure of where the money comes from and where it goes.

In a statement Friday, Lavey slammed the union attempt.

This is an absurdly frivolous complaint, he said. From insiders, defending insiders.

People For Portland has spent at least $1.2 million in the months after Lavey and Looper launched the effort last August, lobbying records filed with the city of Portland show.

But because the group organized as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit, it isnt required to list the amounts of individual contributions or the names of its donors so long as it doesnt engage in campaign or election activity.

In addition to a barrage of ads on TV and online, the groups directed a mass emailing campaign to members of the Portland City Council, Multnomah County Board of Commissioners, Metro Council and state lawmakers who represent Portland.

The pitch? Local leaders have failed to act swiftly in the face of rising disorder, more people living in the streets and persistent struggles to address litter and garbage.

People for Portland has also conducted and publicized a number of polls that indicate a majority of Portlanders, as well as those in the metro area, support dramatic changes on city policies around homelessness and policing.

The groups onslaught of attacks has rankled many of the elected leaders its targeted as well as their political allies.

Selvaggio said the food and commercial workers union made the decision to file a complaint against People For Portland without consulting Peterson or her campaign and after speaking with other political stakeholders, whom he would not disclose.

Peterson, first elected to head the regional Metro government in 2018, is facing a challenge from economic development executive Alisa Pyszka and two other candidates.

The union has also endorsed Portland Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty, who too has landed in People For Portlands crosshairs, in her re-election campaign this year. It didnt coordinate with her or her campaign either, Selvaggio said.

The complaint alleges the group violated multiple Oregon election statutes after running the report card ad by failing to register as a political committee; not filing statements required following the supposed independent expenditure; and not disclosing donor information to the Secretary of States Office.

It asks the office to assess appropriate penalties and force People For Portland to comply with the laws it has allegedly violated.

Frankly, part of the issue is that theyre trying to have this advantage of cloaking their resources, Selvaggio said. That makes a mockery of the transparent election system that Oregon has.

View original post here:
People for Portland accused of violating Oregon election laws - The Spokesman Review

Read More..

Groups call on governor to support transformational funding for water, wastewater infrastructure – Austin Daily Herald – Austin Herald

With cities across the state facing billions of dollars in costs to upgrade water and wastewater infrastructure to replace aging equipment and comply with new regulations, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities (CGMC), Conservation Minnesota, IUOE Local 49, and LIUNA Minnesota an North Dakota held a press conference earlier this week to call on the state to play a larger role in tackling Minnesotas clean water funding crisis.

The organizations assembled here today represent a coalition of local governments, environmental advocates, and labor who have joined together to urge the Legislature to seize the moment and pass an ambitious and transformational package of water and wastewater infrastructure funding, said CGMC Executive Director Bradley Peterson during a press conference Wednesday.

Peterson and other leaders joined together at the Capitol to ask the Legislature to support two bills that aim to address the massive expenses being piled on communities across the state to repair aging water treatment infrastructure and map and replace lead pipes.

The first bill, HF3858/SF3545 authored by Rep. Liz Boldon (DFL-Rochester) and Sen. Andrew Lang (R-Olivia), allocates $299 million in state bonding for grant and loan programs administered by the Public Facilities Authority (PFA).

We know that pollutants like nitrate, PFAS, and sulfate are increasingly challenging for drinking water and wastewater operators to manage, said Conservation Minnesota Executive Director Paul Austin. This expanded funding can ensure that communities have safe water to drink; and the lakes and rivers, and streams Minnesotans love are safe for swimming and fishing.

More than 200 cities are currently planning for upcoming water and wastewater infrastructure projects, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) estimates it will cost $12.3 billion statewide over the next 20 years to keep up with need. The growing need equates to more cities vying for the limited pool of state dollars.

Austin is one of those communities and needs to undergo a project that is estimated to cost $86.2 million. Without state help, the local ratepayers will have to bear the full cost burden. From 2018 to 2023, Austin residents will have seen a 75 percent increase on their wastewater rates.

The proposed legislation would help cities across Minnesota, like Austin, facing expensive infrastructure projects in dire need of state support, said Austin Mayor Steve King.

Cities like Austin play an essential role in making sure Minnesotas water is clean through our wastewater, stormwater, and drinking water systems, King said. As those systems age and new regulations are added, it becomes very expensive for our cities, which is why we need legislation like this to help cities build and upgrade our water infrastructure.

Because aging water and wastewater infrastructure is an ongoing statewide crisis, the proposed legislation also requests an ongoing $80 million per biennium from the General Fund, $75 million for Point Source Implementation Grant Program and $5 million per biennium for technical assistance grants.

The second bill the group asked the legislature to pass, HF4115/SFXXX authored by Rep. Sydney Jordan (DFL-Minneapolis) and Sen. David Senjem (R-Rochester), aims to map and replace all residential lead service lines by 2032 and provide the funding to make that possible. The bill would provide $10 million in grants for cities to map and inventory lead service lines across Minnesota and $30 million per year for 10 years to replace those lines.

For decades we have known that thousands of Minnesotan households have lead pipes delivering drinking water to their homes, said Conservation Minnesota Executive Director Paul Austin. This is a threat to the health and development of children living in these homes.

According to a recent report from the Minnesota Department of Health, there are an estimated 100,000 to 260,000 lead lines currently delivering drinking water to homes in Minnesota. While federal resources are available to fund mapping and replacement costs, it will not be enough to cover the total cost. Additionally, some federal resources are only available as loans, which many communities and residents cannot afford.

As we know, there is no safe level of lead drinking water, Peterson said. There is no excuse, given the resources available, to allow our most basic infrastructure to continue to be a danger to the health of our states residents.

These projects will also boost local economies with the creation of thousands of construction jobs across the state. A study from the United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipefitters estimates replacing lead service pipes in Minnesota will create around 2,400 jobs annually over 10 years.

Transformational investment in our water infrastructure will multiply career opportunities and training for local workers and build momentum to bring more women, veterans, and people of color into the construction industry, said Joel Smith, President and Business Manager of LIUNA Minnesota and North Dakota. LIUNA members are skilled in lead service line replacement, and we take pride in working to help our own communities address drinking water needs and have worked on lead pipe replacements statewide. Our members will be excited to use their skills to do this work and help protect the water and health of our communities, lakes, and rivers.

In addition to their two main bills, the group asked the state to include bonding funding for stormwater infrastructure, capital improvements to public infrastructure to mitigate inflow and infiltration, and individual municipal water and wastewater projects not adequately addressed by current grant and loan programs.

Without meaningful state investment, Minnesota water systems will continue to fall into disrepair, adding to the financial burden on communities, while jeopardizing our health and water resources. With a projected surplus of $9.3 billion, now is the time to make a transformational investment in our water infrastructure.

As Conservation Minnesota Executive Director Paul Austin said, What could be more important than having safe, clean water?

More:
Groups call on governor to support transformational funding for water, wastewater infrastructure - Austin Daily Herald - Austin Herald

Read More..

From rich data to dispassionate analysis, Nalin Mehtas The New BJP is a work of empirical ambition – Newslaundry

Almost three years after political scientist Rajni Kothari used the phrase Congress system in 1964 to describe the partys dominant position in Indian politics as an umbrella, an opposition party was grappling with another side of the story.

It was 1967. During a party meeting at Calicut, Deendayal Upadhyay, the leader of the BJPs predecessor Bharatiya Jan Sangh, talked about political untouchability practised against the party. He hinted at the unwillingness of other political forces to ally with the Jan Sangh in mounting a challenge to one-party dominance.

But five decades later, the turnaround has been historic. Today, the BJP forms the pivot of Indian politics a dominance that could not be foretold by even its spells of modest success and stints in power in some states and the centre from the 1990s.

This has also meant that recent years have seen a spurt in efforts to study, explain and interpret the partys phenomenal rise. More often than not, such efforts have been coloured by value judgements and the political outlook of the authors. Thus, they added little value to the task of understanding the political space, social dynamics, and evolving strategies that have shaped the partys ascendancy.

That, however, hasnt held back academic and journalist Nalin Mehtas The New BJP (published by Westland) from being the most ambitious attempt at using fresh data and analytical tools to dissect different facets of the current BJPs widening electoral appeal and social base, its policy measures and political messaging, especially the style and substance of its digital outreach. In that context, the book marks a point of departure in treatises on BJP a genre that has come into its own in recent years.

At the outset, while steering clear of the lure to evaluate recent strands and shifts in Indian politics, Mehta is clear about what the book will probe.

Why did the BJP start winning on this scale? he writes. Was it only because of a cultural shift in India? Or was its edifice of expansion built on creating a much wider, deeper superstructure of new constituencies of voters who aligned with it for reasons beyond the cultural divide? How did the BJPs growth patterns differ across Indias regions, in new catchment areas where it had never held sway before or in areas where it failed to make inroads? In other words, what really was happening in India, how did the BJP systematically become the countrys largest political party and its fulcrum of power? These are the fundamental questions I seek to answer.

Such questions, as he sees it, need to be examined because it was vital at this point in Indias national journey to understand the levers of its [the BJPs] political growth dispassionately.

Its anybodys guess as to whether all these questions, that too in their entirety, could find answers in the book. But the empirical goals it has set for itself are impressive, even if partly achieved. Its methodological core field visits, interviews and conversations over the years, written sources, archives, documents has led to two innovative statistical measures.

First, Mehta and data scientist Rishabh Srivastava developed a data-mining software called Normative Analysis of Reporting and Discourse, or NARAD. This was used to create an original database of 11,588 BJP-related documents between 2006 and 2019, approximating 17.9 million words. AI tools were put to use to identify patterns in such a wide array of data.

The inferences that could be drawn are important. On political messaging, for instance, unlike what many commentators believe, religious identity issues like the Ayodhya temple featured quite low in the partys pecking order of communication priorities, coming after issues like development, defence, agriculture, women, youth and Kashmir. Interestingly, a degree of the relentless targeting of the key national opposition was also visible as the data revealed that the BJP used more words slamming the Congress than talking about itself.

Second, Mehta, in collaboration with journalist Sanjeev Singh, came up with the Mehta-Singh index to measure the BJPs social base. The fact that the party worked on the social engineering of expanding the party beyond the limits of upper caste support groups to a number of OBC and Dalit groups is documented through numbers. The data showed that while becoming a poll behemoth, the BJP ensured that it became more and more socially representative. In the Hindi heartland states, this has also been used to challenge the social coalition of regional parties. On the national stage, the BJP was alert to take into its fold the OBC support base in a number of states, a catchment area left open by the Congress in the early decades after independence. In the pursuit of what American political scientist Paul Brass had termed as a coalition of extremes in states like Bihar which meant a support base among upper castes, Muslims and Dalits the Congress left a large section of OBCs unattended and unaccommodated.

Even in the recent Uttar Pradesh poll, the widening of the partys support base groups, as well as diversity in its representation, further attest to the books statistical indicators. On this count, Mehta could have elaborated on how the partys successful forays into winning new caste groups of OBCs and Dalits was accomplished without distancing its traditional voter base among upper caste groups. Here, the book seems more focused on what and not why an understandable frame but perhaps putting together both could have further benefited students of social politics.

The other baggage that the BJP has been able to shed in recent years has been its earlier limitation as an urban party. In Hindi heartland states, and Mehta uses UP as a large case study to produce data, the party has emerged as the rural party as well, establishing a clear edge over its rivals. Overcoming this spatial challenge was important for the partys growth. As early as 1990, scholar Bruce Desmond Grahams study of the BJS (Hindu Nationalism and Indian Politics: The Origins and the Development of Bharatiya Jana Sangha, Cambridge University Press, 1990), the BJPs precursor, had noted that in states like UP, the partys efforts to expand in rural areas were not successful, and were even resisted. Put in that context, the BJPs success today in making deep inroads into villages and then building rural strongholds in the Hindi heartland seems a feat accomplished against the weight of history.

A good measure of this turnaround has also been achieved by how the BJP has prioritised social welfarism in its policy interventions. Various schemes centred around cash transfers, access to cooking gas, healthcare, housing and efficient delivery of rations, to name a few, have created a new political constituency of beneficiaries, called the labharthi vote. More recently, even the rough edges of poor health infrastructure during the pandemic were, to an extent, blunted by taming extreme hardship through welfare initiatives. The book puts together numerous sets of data on welfare interventions and the focus on delivery. Even if this could be seen as taking a leaf out of the Congresss stylebook, its execution and public projection has built a support base of its own, especially among women voters.

However, its not only welfare politics that has brought it the goodwill of women voters. In Mehtas analytical frame, the BJPs casting the idea of the national in the image of motherhood had a ring of reaching out to a different set of spiritually-inclined womanhood. The author reflects on how it had the imprint of the milieu-specific agency of womanhood. That the third wave feminism could allow for these variations might be another argument that the book fleetingly touches upon.That, however, is a more abstract part of an effort that has more to do with hard numbers of empirical analysis.

The partys successful expansion in northeast states, and its challenges and mixed results (such as in Karnataka) in the south, also finds space. As a party working to make inroads into new geography and support groups, the BJPs failures and its review are seen as vital to how the party holds onto its ambition of a pan-India footprint, even sway.

In navigating the numbers, Mehta is careful about not getting lost in them. The book is sprinkled with notes from field studies and a number of conversations. Some of which could have been given more space to put the numbers in perspective, such as how close or sometimes misleading they could be in measuring mass perceptions. To add to that, the book makes interesting points about the BJP-RSS convergence and divergence. In the process, the book also counters the conventional thinking about the BJPs dependence on RSS workers for campaigns. In the last few years, the BJP cadre strength has outnumbered that of the RSS by a fair distance, thus making the latter an auxiliary force to the mainstay of the BJP workforce in conducting poll campaigns or public communication at the ground level.

The 809-page tome has obviously covered more ground, including chapters on the partys ideological evolution, particularly the economic worldview. Similarly, it has traced some parts of the current discourse in general and the partys perspectives to the early decades of post-independence politics in India. Even though leaving a historical register isnt one of the books aims, it has left some informative notes on party competition.

Amid the recent flurry of party-specific treatises, Nalin Mehta has offered a work of empirical ambition, with a blend of data-rich insight, the analytical frame of a political scientist, and journalistic reportage. The book will provide students of politics some of the tools to revisit the BJP turnaround story and its rise to the pivot of Indian polity and reshaping social coalitions. In doing so, the focus of what might at times make the why take a backseat, but that would have interrupted its empirical narrative. Answering the many whys, and there could be many answers, awaits another tome. By all accounts, the genre of treatises on the party is going to have a longer run.

Follow this link:

From rich data to dispassionate analysis, Nalin Mehtas The New BJP is a work of empirical ambition - Newslaundry

Read More..

Nearly 27% of US coal mined in 2021 went to plants set to retire this decade – S&P Global

U.S. coal producers are running out of customers and the situation is likely to get worse.

Coal plants intending to close by 2030 received 26.9% of U.S. coal production in 2021, an S&P Global Commodity Insights analysis of production and fuel contract data found. The figure climbs to 37.4% when looking at plants with plans to shut down before 2042.

Public health and environmental groups have put coal power under relentless pressure to clean up its high levels of air pollution, while the falling cost of renewables and low price of natural gas has undercut the economic case for the product. There are no clear plans for the construction of a new U.S. coal plant in the near term and announcements of more retirements are still trickling in.

Coal retirements shrink customer base

A previous analysis showed that 2028 would be a record year for the amount of retiring coal plant power capacity, but 2025 will be the single roughest year in U.S. coal's near future based on 2021 destinations. The coal plants scheduled to retire in 2025 alone account for about 3.8% of the amount of coal mined in the U.S. in 2021.

Regional variations in impact

The Powder River Basin, the largest coal mining region in the nation by volume, delivered 50.5% of its 2021 coal to plants with retirements scheduled in the next 20 years, while Central Appalachia fared better. The region only delivered 2.0% of the coal it mined to power plants with plans to retire thanks to its focus on metallurgical coal used in steelmaking. The Illinois Basin and Northern Appalachia regions each delivered approximately one-third of their mined coal to U.S. power plants with plans to retire by 2042.

In the relatively small Four Corners mining region, 2021 deliveries to plants retiring in the next two decades were equivalent to 96.1% of coal production from the region for the year.

Large mine-level impacts

In 2021, several coal mines delivered an amount of coal to plants set to retire that exceeded the amount of coal produced by the mine. This is possible due to inventory practices and other factors including the winding down of operations at the mine.

Smaller companies highly exposed to retirements

In 2021, 10 companies delivered an amount of coal that exceeded total annual production to plants set to retire by the end of 2042. The largest by overall production was Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC, which in 2021 shipped 10.2 million tons of coal to plants retiring by 2042 while producing just 9.5 million tons.

The overall market for domestic demand and export coal is projected to decline by 131 million tons between 2021 and 2027, Steve Piper, director of energy research at Commodity Insights, wrote in an early March analysis. Declining natural gas prices are expected to continue to push coal generation demand lower through 2030, Piper added.

Visit link:

Nearly 27% of US coal mined in 2021 went to plants set to retire this decade - S&P Global

Read More..