Page 2,001«..1020..2,0002,0012,0022,003..2,0102,020..»

Solend Safeguards Its Users And Funds, As Whale Takes In-Charge! But Is Solana (SOL) Now In A Bigger Trouble? – Coinpedia Fintech News

The folks from the crypto town have been probing the credibility of Solana, ever since it had its first DDoS attack. Fast forward to this date, the top-tier blockchain has been a victim of a number of congestions and troubles. In a very recent event, Solanas lending and borrowing protocol Solend. Has been in question of, its initiative of taking over a whale account.

While the protocol has withdrawn the proposal and is now in contact with the account holder. Proponents from the coin market have rolled-up their sleeves to cross-check the matter and get the facts right. Successively, the findings are now questioning the credibility of the network. Buckle-up as this write-up explores the ins and outs of the matter.

From one of the updates covered by CoinPedia, the other day. We are now aware of the fact that Solend has withdrawn its proposal to take over the whale account. In continuation to the same, we now have more facts in hand. Which aims to demystify the matter around Solanas lending and borrowing protocol Solend.

Crypto investor and analyst Miles Deutscher in a Twitter thread highlights the bustle around Solend. The proponent brings to light that, despite the backlash to SLND1 by the masses, the proposal saw 97.5% votes in its favour. He cites that over 90% of the votes were issued by a single user. The partisan calls it a fundamental flaw in the system, as the voting power depends on the users DAO holdings.

With the community going through internal disputes, the lending protocol had called for a new proposal to invalidate the older one. While the move is a welcoming one, the presence of DAO comes into question. The happenings around Solend have been questioning the sole purpose of decentralisation, and that of the networks centralisation.

Summing up, after all the hustle, the team has confirmed that the whale account is now in contact with the team. And that the whale is now moving its funds. That said, veterans from the business are now pointing at Solana for its reliability. However, the price of SOL has taken little to no brunt. The altcoin is presently trading 4.65% higher at $37.2.

Was this writing helpful?

Read the original:
Solend Safeguards Its Users And Funds, As Whale Takes In-Charge! But Is Solana (SOL) Now In A Bigger Trouble? - Coinpedia Fintech News

Read More..

WAVES makes a big splash, but heres why volumes could be key – AMBCrypto News

WAVES saw some ripples in its price action over the weekend after re-testing support near the $4.20-price level. Those ripples eventually turned into a strong bullish wave, one propelling the altcoin into the list of top gainers for this week.

WAVES hovered just above its current structural support around $4.20 during the weekend after last weeks bearish performance. This is the same level where the price found support towards the end of May. While WAVES noted some upside over the weekend, the bulls demonstrated their strength on Tuesday.

WAVES soared as high as $7.20 on Tuesday after a 43% rally. It peaked at $7.28 on Wednesday morning, before seeing a slight pullback to its press time price of $6.58. Its weekly performance was still up by 49%, despite the slight decline.

The uptick was fueled by strong demand highlighted by the MFI. The slight pullback near its latest highs took place after the price encountered some friction near its 50% RSI level.

However, there is more to WAVES latest performance than demand near the support line.

WAVES uptick happened at around the same time that its network registered a strong increase in NFT trade volumes. Total NFT trade volume increased from $663k on 17 June to peaking at $8.07 million on 19 June. Now, while it fell to $1.46 million by 21 June, this NFT activity preceded the alts latest rally. In fact, this may have been the catalyst that triggered the strong price uptick.

The supply held by whales does not reflect the cryptos price action, however. It did, on the contrary, signify some accumulation courtesy of its uptick on 17 June. It has since registered outflows though.

On-chain volume increased significantly on 21 June, coinciding with its strong rally on the same day.

The supply held by whales metric also underscores the lack of strong buying pressure this week. WAVES might thus fail to maintain its latest rally due to these reasons, coupled with the unfavourable market sentiment.

However, its bullish performance this week is a sign that it is starting to see healthy volumes. Especially after a lackluster performance in the second half of May.

Link:
WAVES makes a big splash, but heres why volumes could be key - AMBCrypto News

Read More..

Graph Price Analysis: High Volume Reversal may Drive GRT to $0.15 – CoinGape

Published 2 days ago

The Graph(GRT) price surpasses the long-coming resistance trendline with a reversal from the $0.093 support level. The increased demand for the altcoin brings a reversal as the overall market takes a break from the falling trend. Will GRT buyers capitalize on this halt in the bear market to reach the $0.15 mark?

Source- Tradingview

On June 11th, the GRT sellers breached the $0.128 price action level resulting in the descending triangle breakout. However, the fallout rally failed to drive the price far from $0.10 as the trend took a bullish turnaround from the $0.093 mark.

The bullish turnaround surpasses the resistance trendline and forms a rounding bottom reversal pattern with the neckline at $0.128. The reversal starts after a series of long-tail candles and propels the GRT price by 27% higher in the last four days.

Today, the GRT price has jumped 7.97% and teased a bull run to the overhead resistance at $0.128. However, buyers hoping to ride the bullish raid can find a safer entry spot at the neckline breakout.

A bull run above the $0.128 neckline can drive the breakout rally to the next supply area at $0.20 if GRT price undermine the selling pressure at $0.15.

On the opposite end, the failure to surpass the overhead resistance can result in a sideways trend between $0.10 and $0.128.

MACD indicator: The fast and slow lines regain the bullish alignment and undermine the previous bearish crossover. The resurging bullish histograms represent a surge in buying pressure and add points to the bullish breakout theory.

Bollinger Bands: the bullish reversal launches from the lower band and prepares to take on the midline.

From the past 5 years I working in Journalism. I follow the Blockchain & Cryptocurrency from last 3 years. I have written on a variety of different topics including fashion, beauty, entertainment, and finance. raech out to me at brian (at) coingape.com

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.

Link:
Graph Price Analysis: High Volume Reversal may Drive GRT to $0.15 - CoinGape

Read More..

MATICs last 80 days have this to say about the cryptos fortunes – AMBCrypto News

Traders and investors holding on to Polygon [MATIC] may have spotted a 10% uptick in price over the last 24 hours. In doing so, they may have assumed that a bullish run was underway. Unfortunately, they would be wrong.

With an index price of $0.3637, the crypto has dropped back to its April 2021 levels. With the MACD poised for a bearish run, the three month-long decline in price might be far from over.

Struggling to keep the bears at bay, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the Money Flow Index (MFI) have been stationed below 50 for three months. Within that period, the RSI went as low as 22 on 12 May. The MFI also touched a low of 13 on 11 April. At press time, the RSI and MFI were deeply oversold at 31 and 18, respectively.

While the latest uptick in the price of MATIC might give investors a false sense of recovery, it is trite to point out that recovery is still far from sight. Looking at the 50 EMA showed the EMA line resting comfortably above the price.

This is indicative of a bearish bias. Also, implying a renewed bear run, the MACD line on 12 June intersected the trendline in a downward curve.

The position of the exchange flow balance metric for MATIC lent credence to its bearish outlook. With a reading of -13.74 million at press time, a price drop down seemed imminent.

A review of MATICs on-chain performance over the last three months revealed a decline in the number of new addresses created on the network daily.

After registering a high of 3357 on 12 May, the networks growth took on a downtrend. At the time of writing, it had recorded a 50% drop to be pegged at 1,672 new addresses.

Whale accumulation of the altcoin has embarked on a steady decline since mid-May. After recording a total count of 1,079 transactions between 10 and 13 of May, the count for whale transactions above $100k has since taken a beating.

Since 13 May, a 62% decline has been registered. For transactions above $1 million, an 88% drop in count has been recorded since the high on 13 May.

In addition to this, active deposits on the network have dropped steadily since 11 May after a high of 661.

So far this year, the Polygon Network has introduced some updates to its ecosystem. These updates include the Green Manifesto and its Carbon Neutral project. However, with a sustained decline in price, more has to be done by the network in order to retain its investors.

Read more:
MATICs last 80 days have this to say about the cryptos fortunes - AMBCrypto News

Read More..

IonQ and GE Research Demonstrate High Potential of Quantum Computing for Risk Aggregation – Business Wire

COLLEGE PARK, Md.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--IonQ (NYSE: IONQ), an industry leader in quantum computing, today announced promising early results with its partner, GE Research, to explore the benefits of quantum computing for modeling multi-variable distributions in risk management.

Leveraging a Quantum Circuit Born Machine-based framework on standardized, historical indexes, IonQ and GE Research, the central innovation hub for the General Electric Company (NYSE: GE), were able to effectively train quantum circuits to learn correlations among three and four indexes. The prediction derived from the quantum framework outperformed those of classical modeling approaches in some cases, confirming that quantum copulas can potentially lead to smarter data-driven analysis and decision-making across commercial applications. A blog post further explaining the research methodology and results is available here.

Together with GE Research, IonQ is pushing the boundaries of what is currently possible to achieve with quantum computing, said Peter Chapman, CEO and President, IonQ. While classical techniques face inefficiencies when multiple variables have to be modeled together with high precision, our joint effort has identified a new training strategy that may optimize quantum computing results even as systems scale. Tested on our industry-leading IonQ Aria system, were excited to apply these new methodologies when tackling real world scenarios that were once deemed too complex to solve.

While classical techniques to form copulas using mathematical approximations are a great way to build multi-variate risk models, they face limitations when scaling. IonQ and GE Research successfully trained quantum copula models with up to four variables on IonQs trapped ion systems by using data from four representative stock indexes with easily accessible and variating market environments.

By studying the historical dependence structure among the returns of the four indexes during this timeframe, the research group trained its model to understand the underlying dynamics. Additionally, the newly presented methodology includes optimization techniques that potentially allow models to scale by mitigating local minima and vanishing gradient problems common in quantum machine learning practices. Such improvements demonstrate a promising way to perform multi-variable analysis faster and more accurately, which GE researchers hope lead to new and better ways to assess risk with major manufacturing processes such as product design, factory operations, and supply chain management.

As we have seen from recent global supply chain volatility, the world needs more effective methods and tools to manage risks where conditions can be so highly variable and interconnected to one another, said David Vernooy, a Senior Executive and Digital Technologies Leader at GE Research. The early results we achieved in the financial use case with IonQ show the high potential of quantum computing to better understand and reduce the risks associated with these types of highly variable scenarios.

Todays results follow IonQs recent announcement of the companys new IonQ Forte quantum computing system. The system features novel, cutting-edge optics technology that enables increased accuracy and further enhances IonQs industry leading system performance. Partnerships with the likes of GE Research and Hyundai Motors illustrate the growing interest in our industry-leading systems and feeds into the continued success seen in Q1 2022.

About IonQ

IonQ, Inc. is a leader in quantum computing, with a proven track record of innovation and deployment. IonQ's current generation quantum computer, IonQ Forte, is the latest in a line of cutting-edge systems, including IonQ Aria, a system that boasts industry-leading 20 algorithmic qubits. Along with record performance, IonQ has defined what it believes is the best path forward to scale. IonQ is the only company with its quantum systems available through the cloud on Amazon Braket, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as through direct API access. IonQ was founded in 2015 by Christopher Monroe and Jungsang Kim based on 25 years of pioneering research. To learn more, visit http://www.ionq.com.

IonQ Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words. Statements that are not historical in nature, including the words anticipate, expect, suggests, plan, believe, intend, estimates, targets, projects, should, could, would, may, will, forecast and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include those related to IonQs ability to further develop and advance its quantum computers and achieve scale; IonQs ability to optimize quantum computing results even as systems scale; the expected launch of IonQ Forte for access by select developers, partners, and researchers in 2022 with broader customer access expected in 2023; IonQs market opportunity and anticipated growth; and the commercial benefits to customers of using quantum computing solutions. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions and, as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this press release, including but not limited to: market adoption of quantum computing solutions and IonQs products, services and solutions; the ability of IonQ to protect its intellectual property; changes in the competitive industries in which IonQ operates; changes in laws and regulations affecting IonQs business; IonQs ability to implement its business plans, forecasts and other expectations, and identify and realize additional partnerships and opportunities; and the risk of downturns in the market and the technology industry including, but not limited to, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors section of IonQs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 and other documents filed by IonQ from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings identify and address other important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and IonQ assumes no obligation and does not intend to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. IonQ does not give any assurance that it will achieve its expectations.

Originally posted here:
IonQ and GE Research Demonstrate High Potential of Quantum Computing for Risk Aggregation - Business Wire

Read More..

The Spooky Quantum Phenomenon You’ve Never Heard Of – Quanta Magazine

Perhaps the most famously weird feature of quantum mechanics is nonlocality: Measure one particle in an entangled pair whose partner is miles away, and the measurement seems to rip through the intervening space to instantaneously affect its partner. This spooky action at a distance (as Albert Einstein called it) has been the main focus of tests of quantum theory.

Nonlocality is spectacular. I mean, its like magic, said Adn Cabello, a physicist at the University of Seville in Spain.

But Cabello and others are interested in investigating a lesser-known but equally magical aspect of quantum mechanics: contextuality. Contextuality says that properties of particles, such as their position or polarization, exist only within the context of a measurement. Instead of thinking of particles properties as having fixed values, consider them more like words in language, whose meanings can change depending on the context: Timeflies likean arrow. Fruitflies likebananas.

Although contextuality has lived in nonlocalitys shadow for over 50 years, quantum physicists now consider it more of a hallmark feature of quantum systems than nonlocality is. A single particle, for instance, is a quantum system in which you cannot even think about nonlocality, since the particle is only in one location, said Brbara Amaral, a physicist at the University of So Paulo in Brazil. So [contextuality] is more general in some sense, and I think this is important to really understand the power of quantum systems and to go deeper into why quantum theory is the way it is.

Researchers have also found tantalizing links between contextuality and problems that quantum computers can efficiently solve that ordinary computers cannot; investigating these links could help guide researchers in developing new quantum computing approaches and algorithms.

And with renewed theoretical interest comes a renewed experimental effort to prove that our world is indeed contextual. In February, Cabello, in collaboration with Kihwan Kim at Tsinghua University in Beijing, China, published a paper in which they claimed to have performed the first loophole-free experimental test of contextuality.

The Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell is widely credited with showing that quantum systems can be nonlocal. By comparing the outcomes of measurements of two entangled particles, he showed with his eponymous theorem of 1965 that the high degree of correlations between the particles cant possibly be explained in terms of local hidden variables defining each ones separate properties. The information contained in the entangled pair must be shared nonlocally between the particles.

Bell also proved a similar theorem about contextuality. He and, separately, Simon Kochen and Ernst Specker showed that it is impossible for a quantum system to have hidden variables that define the values of all their properties in all possible contexts.

In Kochen and Speckers version of the proof, they considered a single particle with a quantum property called spin, which has both a magnitude and a direction. Measuring the spins magnitude along any direction always results in one of two outcomes: 1 or 0. The researchers then asked: Is it possible that the particle secretly knows what the result of every possible measurement will be before it is measured? In other words, could they assign a fixed value a hidden variable to all outcomes of all possible measurements at once?

Quantum theory says that the magnitudes of the spins along three perpendicular directions must obey the 101 rule: The outcomes of two of the measurements must be 1 and the other must be 0. Kochen and Specker used this rule to arrive at a contradiction. First, they assumed that each particle had a fixed, intrinsic value for each direction of spin. They then conducted a hypothetical spin measurement along some unique direction, assigning either 0 or 1 to the outcome. They then repeatedly rotated the direction of their hypothetical measurement and measured again, each time either freely assigning a value to the outcome or deducing what the value must be in order to satisfy the 101 rule together with directions they had previously considered.

They continued until, in the 117th direction, the contradiction cropped up. While they had previously assigned a value of 0 to the spin along this direction, the 101 rule was now dictating that the spin must be 1. The outcome of a measurement could not possibly return both 0 and 1. So the physicists concluded that there is no way a particle can have fixed hidden variables that remain the same regardless of context.

While the proof indicated that quantum theory demands contextuality, there was no way to actually demonstrate this through 117 simultaneous measurements of a single particle. Physicists have since devised more practical, experimentally implementable versions of the original Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem involving multiple entangled particles, where a particular measurement on one particle defines a context for the others.

In 2009, contextuality, a seemingly esoteric aspect of the underlying fabric of reality, got a direct application: One of the simplified versions of the original Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem was shown to be equivalent to a basic quantum computation.

The proof, named Mermins star after its originator, David Mermin, considered various combinations of contextual measurements that could be made on three entangled quantum bits, or qubits. The logic of how earlier measurements shape the outcomes of later measurements has become the basis for an approach called measurement-based quantum computing. The discovery suggested that contextuality might be key to why quantum computers can solve certain problems faster than classical computers an advantage that researchers have struggled mightily to understand.

Robert Raussendorf, a physicist at the University of British Columbia and a pioneer of measurement-based quantum computing, showed that contextuality is necessary for a quantum computer to beat a classical computer at some tasks, but he doesnt think its the whole story. Whether contextuality powers quantum computers is probably not exactly the right question to ask, he said. But we need to get there question by question. So we ask a question that we understand how to ask; we get an answer. We ask the next question.

Some researchers have suggested loopholes around Bell, Kochen and Speckers conclusion that the world is contextual. They argue that context-independent hidden variables havent been conclusively ruled out.

In February, Cabello and Kim announced that they had closed every plausible loophole by performing a loophole free Bell-Kochen-Specker experiment.

The experiment entailed measuring the spins of two entangled trapped ions in various directions, where the choice of measurement on one ion defined the context for the other ion. The physicists showed that, although making a measurement on one ion does not physically affect the other, it changes the context and hence the outcome of the second ions measurement.

Skeptics would ask: How can you be certain that the context created by the first measurement is what changed the second measurement outcome, rather than other conditions that might vary from experiment to experiment? Cabello and Kim closed this sharpness loophole by performing thousands of sets of measurements and showing that the outcomes dont change if the context doesnt. After ruling out this and other loopholes, they concluded that the only reasonable explanation for their results is contextuality.

Cabello and others think that these experiments could be used in the future to test the level of contextuality and hence, the power of quantum computing devices.

If you want to really understand how the world is working, said Cabello, you really need to go into the detail of quantum contextuality.

See the original post:
The Spooky Quantum Phenomenon You've Never Heard Of - Quanta Magazine

Read More..

Reporting on the Future, Now – The New York Times

In labs across the world, scientists are developing the power of quantum mechanics, a field of physics that behaves unlike anything we experience in our everyday lives. In 2019, Google announced that its quantum computer had achieved quantum supremacy, which could allow new kinds of computers to perform calculations at what were once unimaginable speeds. Other companies and research labs are exploring techniques like quantum teleportation, which sends data between locations without moving the matter that holds it a concept that Albert Einstein had deemed impossible.

The seemingly impossible, though, is what Cade Metzs reporting hinges on. As a Times correspondent who covers emerging technologies, he has written about quantum teleportation; cars that drive themselves; immersive digital worlds; and artistry in artificial intelligence. If a technology is futuristic or disruptive, Mr. Metz most likely knows about it.

In an interview, Mr. Metz talked about advances in technology and the challenges in translating complicated subjects for everyday readers. This interview has been edited.

What is your background in technology reporting?

Before coming to The Times, I was with Wired, where I was trying to identify technologies that were coming out of research labs and changing in ways that were likely to have an impact on our daily lives.

I was an English major in college, and I always wanted to be a writer and a reporter, but my father was an engineer. Ive always been interested in writing about engineers and researchers who I feel like, even within technology coverage, can get short shrift meaning, when people write stories and books about the tech industry, they write about entrepreneurs; they write about the heads of companies. They dont necessarily write about the people actually building the stuff. Like anybody else, theyre fascinating people in their own right, so thats what Ive always gravitated to.

How do you write about such complicated subjects for the average reader?

You have to make an effort to show people that this type of thing is still in the future. Just by writing about it, you give the impression that its imminent, and that can be a danger. Its the same thing when I cover artificial intelligence; just using that term implies things. When we hear those words, it brings up certain images decades of science fiction movies and science fiction novels.

When you write about quantum computing, in particular, you have to use analogy. This is behavior that we dont experience in our everyday lives, and that makes it fascinating. The quantum supremacy story got a lot of attention; it sort of captures the imagination. But it is very hard to find that sweet spot where youre properly representing the technology and doing so in a way that people can grasp it.

I think the key challenge is not to give people the wrong impression, and not making this seem closer than it is. Particularly with this type of technology, you want to be judicious.

When did quantum teleportation become something you wanted to report on?

Ive written about other types of quantum technology. The trick is figuring out the right time to write about it again. You look for certain milestones that indicate progress will continue. The quantum supremacy movement is definitely one of those. I had targeted that for years. Quantum supremacy moments show that you can do something with a quantum machine that you couldnt do with a traditional machine.

What is most useful, and I think this is true of all sorts of technologies, is talking to a lot of people about each particular aspect..

These are academics, government researchers. There are people all over the world. You talk to these researchers here, in the Netherlands. Theres a lot of work in China. I spent time talking to a lot of people in all those places.

What excites you most about the beat?

When you get to write not only about the technology but also about the people building it and what it means for them. Those are the stories Im most satisfied with. Thats ultimately what I wanted to do, dating back to watching my father and his career realizing the significance of intersections of the technology with the people.

Read the rest here:
Reporting on the Future, Now - The New York Times

Read More..

Bitcoin bounces back after falling to new 2022 lows over the weekend – CNBC

Bitcoin rallied to a record high of nearly $69,000 at the height of the 2021 crypto frenzy. In 2022, it's moved in the opposite direction.

Nurphoto | Getty Images

Bitcoin jumped on Monday, after the cryptocurrency fell below its 2017 high over the weekend, but investors remained on edge thanks to a slew of negative crypto headlines and macro factors keeping pressure on sentiment.

The world's largest cryptocurrency by market cap climbed above the $20,000 mark for much of the day Monday. However, it last edged lower by less than 1% to $20,005.46, according to Coin Metrics. Over the weekend, bitcoin fell as low as $17,601.58. Meanwhile, ether inched higher by less than 1% to $1,102.86.

While investors will welcome the rebound, bitcoin still sits 70% below its all-time high, hit in November. It's down 57% year-to-date. Many have suggested a market bottom could be close, but with so much economic uncertainty remaining, bitcoin still has more downside potential, according to Yuya Hasegawa, a crypto market analyst at Japanese bitcoin exchange Bitbank.

"Bitcoin's weekend dip was, to put it simply, not deep enough," he said. "The macro environment has not really changed from last week's FOMC meeting: there still has not been a clear sign of inflation coming down and the Fed may still drive the economy into recession by raising rates too aggressively or simply by failing to tame inflation."

With bitcoin unable to hold convincingly above $20,000, industry watchers said the rally might be short-lived.

Vijay Ayyar, vice president of corporate development and international at crypto exchange Luno, told CNBC that unless the price of bitcoin closes above $23,000 on a daily time frame basis, "the odds are this is a dead cat bounce."

"We're oversold, so a bounce was expected," he added.

The broader cryptocurrency market has been plagued by a number of issues in recent weeks, beginning with the collapse of algorithmic stablecoin terraUSD and associated token luna.

Attention has now turned to crypto lending companies that promise users high yields for depositing their digital coins. Last week, Celsius, a company with 1.7 million customers and nearly $12 billion of crypto assets under management, paused withdrawal of funds for customers, sparking concerns that it is insolvent.

Cryptocurrency companies have announced rounds of layoffs amid the market downturn. Coinbase, a crypto wallet and exchange, said last week it will cut 18% of full-time jobs. A lending firm called BlockFi said last week it will lay off a fifth of its staff.

Macroeconomic factors including high inflation and upcoming rate hikes from the U.S. Federal Reserve are also weighing on the market.

"When inflation is on the doorstep and with rate hikes in the offing, the risks of a recession round the bend are high," Charles Hayter, CEO of CryptoCompare, told CNBC via email.

"The push me pull you of higher rates sapping cash from mortgaged house owners means people are psychologically bracing and paring back and digital assets are suffering thus."

"Coupled with this, the pull back in the digital asset ecosystem has uncovered a number of systemic issues."

Given the big fall in cryptocurrency prices in the last few weeks, some observers said that a bottom to the market could be close.

Giles Keating, director of Bitcoin Suisse, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe" on Monday that "we're close to a point where some of the real excess leverage has now been driven out of the system and a bottom can begin to be formed."

Leverage refers to trading in which investors effectively use borrowed money to make trades. That means investors can get larger exposure to positions with less initial capital. But that's seen as a risky means of trading as it requires investors to ensure they have enough capital to meet the so-called margin requirements. If they don't, their position is automatically liquidated. Those liquidations are seen as a big factor behind market moves.

Keating said there is still a risk of further liquidation, but he thinks the majority of the selling is over.

"Now some people are warning that we are still not yet there and that if we were to break significantly lower, that we'd see another wave of liquidations," Keating said.

"There's always that risk hovering there. But my feeling, given I think those very very big double digit rebounds we saw, in bitcoin, particularly in ether, I think to my mind that was a sign that a lot of those really big liquidations are now done and that the base really is being formed."

Originally posted here:
Bitcoin bounces back after falling to new 2022 lows over the weekend - CNBC

Read More..

Cryptocurrency Market to Reach 32,530 Billion by 2028 Thanks to Rising Interest of Investors and Increasing Number of Countries Legalizing…

SkyQuest Technology Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Cryptocurrencies are digital or virtual tokens that use cryptography to secure their transactions and to control the creation of new units. Cryptocurrencies are decentralized, meaning they are not subject to government or financial institution control. This allows them to operate without the need for a third party. Considering current market conditions and future growth prospective, the global cryptocurrency market is poised to grow at a CAGR of 54.7% during the forecast period, 2022-2028.

Westford, USA, June 21, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Why is the Cryptocurrency Market Gaining All the Popularity?

One of the biggest advantages of cryptocurrency is that it is secure and anonymous. Transactions are processed through a network of computers and no personal information is required. This makes cryptocurrency ideal for online transactions and darknets. Additionally, cryptocurrency is immune to inflation and taxation, which makes it an attractive option for investors.

They can be exchanged for other currencies, products, and services. As of June 2022, there are over 18,000 different cryptocurrencies in existence in the global cryptocurrency market. With each passing year, cryptocurrencies are becoming increasingly popular, with many people looking to invest in them. What is behind this growing interest?

One reason might be that cryptocurrencies are not subject to government or financial institution control. They are also relatively new and offer a high degree of privacy. Another reason might be the potential for big profits. Cryptocurrencies have been on a tear in recent months, with some ETH (Ethereum) rising more than 1,000% in value over the last three years!

Current Developments in Cryptocurrency Market

Cryptocurrency market is witnessing a lot of volatility as investors react to recent events. The price of Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, has seen significant swings in value over the past few months. For instance, Bitcoin was trading at over $67000 per coin in November 2021 but has since fallen to around $20,000 in June 2022. Ethereum is also down about 80% in value over the past one year and Ripple is down about 70%. These are all major coins, so the falls have a big impact on the overall market value.

Story continues

Blockchain experts at SkyQuest Consulting Technology believe that these swings are due to news stories about government intervention or fraud. For example, China recently banned Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), which could be a reason why Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies are falling in value. However, other experts believe that this volatility is just part of the natural cycle of cryptocurrency markets. Cryptocurrencies are still very new and there is a lot of speculation going on. As more people invest in cryptocurrencies, there will be more volatility until those investments mature and become more stable.

Get sample copy of this report:

https://skyquestt.com/sample-request/cryptocurrency-market

Key Factors Responsible for Growth of Cryptocurrency Market

Cryptocurrency market is on the rise and there are various factors that are responsible for its growth. Some of these factors include increasing popularity of digital currencies, regulatory ambiguity surrounding the industry and increasing investment opportunities.

The growing popularity of digital currencies is one of the key reasons behind their growth. Cryptocurrencies are gaining traction because they offer a new way of conducting transactions that is secure and anonymous. This has led to increased demand from investors and users, who see cryptocurrencies as a lucrative avenue for investment.

Regulatory ambiguity surrounding the industry is also a major reason behind the growth of the cryptocurrency market. Numerous governments are still unclear about how to regulate digital currencies, which has created an environment of opportunity for investors. In fact, some countries such as El Salvador, Central African Republic, Cuba, and Iran have even legalized digital currencies as a means of payment. This has helped increase demand for cryptocurrencies and made them more appealing to investors.

Another reason why the cryptocurrency market is on the rise is increasing investment opportunities. Several venture capital firms have begun investing in this space, which has led to an increase in investments in digital currencies. This has prompted several companies to start working on new projects involving cryptocurrencies. This has caused the cryptocurrency market to grow rapidly and expand beyond its traditional user base.

Browse summary of the report and Complete Table of Contents (ToC):

https://skyquestt.com/report/cryptocurrency-market

Growing Demand for Mining Equipment to Drive Cryptocurrency Market

Cryptocurrency mining is the process of verifying and adding blocks to the blockchain. Mining is how new coins are created. Miners are rewarded with cryptocurrency for verifying and committing transactions to the blockchain. The more transactions a miner participates in, the more opportunities they have to earn rewards.

In recent years, cryptocurrency mining has become increasingly competitive. This is because cryptocurrency miners must use expensive hardware in order to verify and add blocks to the blockchain. As a result, demand for cryptocurrency mining equipment is high and growing.

The demand for cryptocurrency mining hardware is growing faster than ever in the global cryptocurrency market. This is because the value of cryptocurrencies is continuing to rise. As more people invest in cryptocurrencies, they need more mining hardware to help them earn profits. There are many different types of cryptocurrency mining hardware available on the market. Some of these include graphics cards, CPUs, and ASICs. Graphics cards are popular because they use a lot of power and tend to be affordable. CPUs are good for small-scale mining because they are cheap and relatively powerful. However, they have difficulty performing multiple tasks at once. ASICs are the most effective type of cryptocurrency mining hardware because they can solve complex algorithms quickly.

Speak to Analyst for your custom requirements:

https://skyquestt.com/speak-with-analyst/cryptocurrency-market

US and China are Largest Cryptocurrency Market, but Future is Not So Bright

The US and China are now the two largest cryptocurrency mining markets in the world. The US accounted for 34% of global mining revenue in 2018, according to data from CoinMarketCap. China was second with a 22% share. However, recently in 2021, China banned the mining of cryptocurrency, but it did not stop the country from underground mining and has become the second largest mining hub. Earlier the ban was imposed, the country was accounting for between 65% to 75% of the total hash rate or processing power of the bitcoin network across the global cryptocurrency market. But it went on to almost zero as the government bodies started cracking down the mining facilities. However, it is not the case now and people have already started mining again with full capacity by hiding their operations underground.

This shift is likely due to the booming prices of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in recent years. The value of Bitcoin has surged more than 2,500% since 2017, reaching a peak of $68000 in 2021. This has caused miners to switch to more lucrative cryptocurrencies.

However, this growth of the cryptocurrency market is not without risk. As cryptocurrencies become more popular, they are at greater risk of being stolen or hacked. In 2018, hackers stole $532 million worth of Ethereum (ETH) from digital currency exchanges across the world. Overall, these trends indicate that cryptocurrency mining remains a lucrative business. However, it is important to be aware of the risks involved and to make sure that wallet is properly secured.

Related Reports in SkyQuests Library:

Global Crypto ATM Market

Global Crowdfunding Market

Global Neo Bank Market

Global Asset Management Market

Global Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Market

About Us:

SkyQuest Technologyis leading growth consulting firm providing market intelligence, commercialization and technology services. It has 450+ happy clients globally.

Address:

1 Apache Way, Westford, Massachusetts 01886

Phone:

USA (+1) 617-230-0741

Email:sales@skyquestt.com

LinkedInFacebookTwitter

See the original post here:
Cryptocurrency Market to Reach 32,530 Billion by 2028 Thanks to Rising Interest of Investors and Increasing Number of Countries Legalizing...

Read More..

Cryptocurrency Bill Aims to Fix Scattershot Regulation, but Misses Mark – Heritage.org

Sens. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., last week introduced theResponsible Financial Innovation Act, which seeks to remove some of the risk that regulators have created in the bitcoin andcryptocurrencyspace.

The bill aims to more clearly define which cryptocurrencies are securities subject to Securities and Exchange Commission oversight, and which are not, and hence subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight instead.

Given the Securities and Exchange Commissionsknee-jerk hostilityto decentralized digital assets, that distinction is welcome.

The effort is important because inept regulators today have left crypto rife with scammers and Ponzi schemes, as legitimate actors fear the regulatory risk. If regulators hold out threats, then good-faith actors stay away, leaving the field to the scammers.

The bills delineation was welcomed by many bitcoin proponents, since it would exclude bitcoin from being considered a security. That could reassure financial institutions that have so far been wary of offering bitcoin products, potentially bringing more good actors into the crypto ecosystem.

In the altcoin community of newer cryptocurrencies, however, many were less enthusiastic, because the bill does little to rein in Securities and Exchange Commission overreach through its adventurous interpretation of definitions, giving the commission new powers it doesnt currently have.

Securities and Exchange Commission overreach could potentially strangle in the crib much of todays decentralized cryptoan industry that could dramatically empower individuals in the face of Wall Street incumbents, and thesurveillance,censorship, andcancel culturethose incumbents impose.

That said, the bill carries several major flaws that will hopefully be addressed as it makes the rounds in Congress. It must pass four committees, each with its own negotiations, so lots can still happen.

First, the bill retains requirements for crypto users to calculate and report their tax gains and losses on a transaction-by-transaction basis, with a very low reporting threshold of $200. Thats akin to tallying your line-item peso gains for each hotel, flight, or nice dinner on that Cancun vacation.

If such reporting is required, it should be raised to at least $10,000 to match the money laundering thresholds already widespread in the U.S. financial system.

A second flaw of the bill is a lost opportunity to rein in the Securities and Exchange Commission, rather than expanding its jurisdiction. The commission has been one of the most imperial, and destructive, of our alphabet soup of financial regulators.

The 2018 Initial Coin Offeringwipeout showed the Securities and Exchange Commission is all too happy to strangleinnovation in the crib, even while turning a blind eye to, or issuing slaps on the wrist for, widespread Wall Street abuses, such asinstitutionalized front-runningoroutright fraud. In contrast, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has been much more aware of the importance of innovation and consumer choice, and the trade-offs involved.

By increasing Securities and Exchange Commission jurisdiction over crypto, particularly in the area of ancillary assets to decentralized networks, this bill risks making the problem worse.

Because the crux of the Securities and Exchange Commissions empire-building is the definition of a security, to fix this, the bill could clearly define a security to replace todays outdated test, perhaps to something like: an instrument that gives the owner the right to a return from a common enterprise, defined as an accounting entity.

A simple definition could cover commonsense securities without giving a green light to the Securities and Exchange Commission to go after anybody it wants to or claim any turf that tickles its fancy.

Despite these flaws, the bill proposes several important reforms. It clarifies and raises transparency on cryptocurrency exchanges, stablecoin reserves, asset custody by third parties, and cryptocurrency brokers, along with a more rational tax treatment of miner revenue in the cryptocurrency space.

These clarifications could rein in the increasing number of failed stablecoins, cryptocurrencies allegedly backed by dollars or other assets that in reality lack sufficient reserves or lack sufficiently liquid reserves.

Meanwhile, the exchange provisions could give more transparency on whether and to what extent exchanges or other cryptocurrency entities are manipulating prices to their advantage, which has been a stumbling block in the approval of a bitcoin spot exchange-traded fundan important vehicle for regular people to invest in crypto without having to learn to code.

Ultimately, the bill, introduced June 6, is a welcome first step to addressing a real concern about arbitrary regulators effectively enabling scammers while punishing broader innovation in private currencies and decentralized infrastructure that could protect Americans in this age of inflationary crisis and Big Tech domination.

Hopefully, what comes out the other end of Congress sausage factory will be an improvement on todays regulatory regime. If so, we can expect more good-faith actors to enter the industry to build bitcoin and other crypto products alongside their gold and dollar offerings.

That could give regular Americans more opportunity to protect themselves from inflation or a financial crisis, while improving Americans ability to invest and use decentralized protocols without having to beg a bureaucrat for permission or worry about scammers and frauds.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal

See more here:
Cryptocurrency Bill Aims to Fix Scattershot Regulation, but Misses Mark - Heritage.org

Read More..