Page 1,877«..1020..1,8761,8771,8781,879..1,8901,900..»

Ann Coulter: They’ve Learned Nothing and Forgotten Nothing – Breitbart

Bill Barr, two-time attorney general and one of approximately 2.5 members of the Trump administration to leave with his reputation intact, has also written one of only two books about that administration worth reading, One Damn Thing After Another. Ive read em all. At least partially. Most did not merit more than a quick skim.

[For those interested, the other book about the Trump administration worth reading is Michael Wolfes Fire and Fury, but judging by its sales, you probably already have this book.]

Ive been a fan of Barrs since long before he worked for Trump and was thrilled when he became Trumps A.G. But when I got to Barrs description of Trumps appeal which went on for pages and pages! I wanted to throw the book out the window.

You can probably guess where Im headed.

By Barrs lights, none of Trumps positives involved immigration.

They will not learn. No matter what we do, no matter how many times Americans tell pollsters they want less immigration, no matter how loudly we beg Washington to halt the endless flow of the third world into our country, the ruling class refuses to listen.

If electing a cretinous flimflam artist to the presidency solely on the strength of his promise to be a hard-ass on immigration didnt wake them up, nothing ever will.

The first clue about the absolute thickheadedness of anyone living within 100 miles of our nations capital was this deeply concerning line from Barrs book:

I had long planned on supporting Jeb Bush for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016.

Next, Barr turns to the political landscape that allowed such a preposterous creature as Trump to sail to victory. The source of the problem, as I saw it, he writes, was the growing strength in the Democratic Party of a Far Left progressive ideology that aimed to tear down and remake American society. Trump, Barr writes, was merely the result of our embittered politics, a bitterness engendered not by Trump but by the increasing militance of the Democratic Partys progressive wing.

Yeah, OK, fine. He gets two points for accurately describing how loathsome Democrats have become. How about the elected Republicans we send to Washington to represent us? Itsyou guyswe really hate. If it were only progressive Democrats voters detested, why NOT Jeb-exclamation point? Why not John My Father Was a Postman Kasich?

Republican presidential candidates, from left to right: John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and Donald Trump during the Republican Presidential Debate in Greenville, South Carolina, on February 13, 2016. (JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

No one imagines that Democrats give a crap about the country. Its Republicans who run for office, pretending to agree with the voters on immigration then get into office and sell out to the Chamber of Commerce.

Oh, you wanted a wall? Yes, absolutely, but first we have to pass these tax cuts, lavish billions of dollars on some foreign country and push through another Wall Street bailout.

For 50 years, in poll after poll, a majority of Americans have said they want LESS immigration. Even the Cheap Labor Lobby at the Cato Institute produced a poll last year showing that 81% of Americans want less immigration than we have today. Sixty-one percent of respondents want to cut immigration by at least half. Ten percent of Americans want zero immigration.

Unfortunately, everything Trump was ever going to accomplish was accomplished at 2:50 a.m. on election night 2016, when he announced hisvictory over Hillary Clinton. (Everything other than turning judicial selection over to the Federalist Society.) At that moment, the densest Republican had to realize that restricting immigration is so popular that even a lout like Trump could win the presidency on it.

After 2016, how could any sentient mammal begin a sentence, as Barr does, But the main reason Trump won the nomination and later the general election was , and not end it with: IMMIGRATION!? (Ill accept a range of substitutes the wall, illegals, Dreamers, Press 1 for English, wages lost to cheap labor immigrants, Kate Steinle, the 9/11 attack did the media forget to tell you that was done by immigrants? the drug epidemic, etc., etc.)

Not Barr. He reels off the standard RNC suicide pact, prattling about the economy, military power, pro-life and school choice.

Yes, Trump won in 2016 because ofschool choice.

Attorney General William Barr participates briefing with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on July 15, 2020. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

You could Ctrl + F: immigration through Barrs entire book and get nary a hit, other than general references to the Immigration and Naturalization Service and this:

Before one of the 2016 presidential debates, Barr is careful to note that he contacted a friend on the candidates team to suggest that Trump say, we welcome legal immigrants, and Latin Americans who come here legally people with a strong work ethic and family values contribute enormously to the country.

And thats how Jeb-exclamation point won the nomination and the general election!

Just this week, Republican Sen. John Cornyn was spotted on the Senate floor, seeming to propose amnesty, collegially telling a Democrat, First guns, now its immigration.

In Cornyns defense, he is massively stupid.

But Barr? Hes a smart man. And yet he picked up nothing from the Shock-the-World 2016 election of Donald Trump except tax cuts and a strong military?

Referring to the monumental arrogance of the Bourbon kings, blithely assuming they could revert to the very behavior that had led to the explosion of the French Revolution in the first place, Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand is supposed to have said, They have learned nothing, and forgotten nothing.

The French nobilitys got nothing on the Republican Party.

Read more:
Ann Coulter: They've Learned Nothing and Forgotten Nothing - Breitbart

Read More..

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter says Trump ‘is done’ – Yahoo! News

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter is predicting the end of Donald Trump's hegemony in the GOP, saying the former president "is done."

"Trump is done," Coulter, a onetime Trump booster turned critic, wrote in an email to The New York Times. "You guys should stop obsessing over him."

Coulter's comments came in an article published in the Times on Sunday about the mounting tensions between Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) amid speculation of a potential showdown for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

While DeSantis has so far sought to tamp down rumors that he's angling for a possible White House bid, his rise within the GOP and growing national profile have irked Trump, who sees the Florida governor as owing his political success to him.

Trump has privately griped about DeSantis's refusal to publicly commit to foregoing a 2024 run if the former president chooses to mount another bid for the White House.

But Trump has also begun to sharpen his stance on DeSantis publicly. In an interview with a South Florida radio host last month, Trump appeared to issue a challenge to the Florida governor, saying that he would beat DeSantis in a 2024 primary if he decided to run.

"If he wanted to run, that's OK with me," Trump said. "I think we'd win by a lot."

Trump also appeared to take a swipe at DeSantis during a recent interview with the conservative One America News Network in which he slammed politicians who won't say whether they received a COVID-19 booster shot as "gutless." DeSantis has repeatedly dodged questions about his booster status.

Coulter pounced on Trump over those comments in a tweet last week calling the former president a "liar and con man."

"EXCLUSIVE: Trump is demanding to know Ron DeSantis's booster status, and I can now reveal it," Coulter wrote. "He was a loyal booster when Trump ran in 2016, but then he learned our president was a liar and con man whose grift was permanent. I hope that clears things up."

More:
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter says Trump 'is done' - Yahoo! News

Read More..

Ann Coulter: Breaking: Trump Was Listening to People as … – Breitbart

January 6 hearings, Day 900: Nothing new.

Apparently, White House counsel Pat Cipillone whom weve been hearing was the Rosetta stone to the whole case against Trump didnt back up the sainted White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson.

Among the shocking claims Hutchinson made two weeks ago was thisalleged exchangebetween her boss, chief of staff Mark Meadows, and Cipollone:

Cipollone: The rioters have gotten into the Capitol, Mark. We need to go see the president now.

Meadows: He doesnt want to do anything

Cipollone: Something needs to be done, or somebody is going to die and this is going to be on your effing hands. Theyre literally calling for the VP to be effing hung.

Meadows: You heard him, Pat, he thinks Mike deserves it.

Cipollone: Effing crazy.

CIPOLLONE MUST TESTIFY! CIPOLLONE MUST TESTIFY!

Well, Cipollone testified last Friday, and the big revelation is: He thought Trump should accept the results of the election.

Yeah, so did everyone else within five miles of the White House except Sidney Powell, Michael Flynn, and the former Overstock.com CEO, Patrick Byrne.

White House Counsel Pat Cipollone at the U.S. Capitol on January 21, 2020. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

Yes, its embarrassing that Trump had a December 18 meeting with these nuts, during which he announced he was going to make Powell special counsel to investigate election theft.

Name a day of the Trump presidency that hedidntsay something stupid. Name a day since the election that you didnt know Trump was listening to Powell, Flynn, and the Overstock guy.

I dont know where liberals get off rolling their eyes at Powells wacky theories about the election. As I understand it, she claims voting machines were rigged by Iran, China and maybe Hugo Chavez, among other totally believable, not-at-all-crazy claims.

Hey, anybody remember the Diebold voting machine conspiracy theory?

According to serious, prominent, respected Democrats, the Diebold company rigged Ohios voting machines in 2004 to flip votes from Kerry to Bush. Without Ohio, Bush would have lost the election.

Among the places the Diebold conspiracy theory was strenuously argued were:

An 8,000-word article by Michael Shnayerson in the April 2004 issue of Vanity Fair;

A 2,800-word article by Christopher Hitchens in the March 2005 Vanity Fair;

An expose by Bobby Kennedy Jr. in the June 15, 2006, Rolling Stone magazine.

The gist of it, to the extent any conspiracy theory can be boiled down to a gist, is that the CEO of Diebold, which provided some of Ohios voting machines, was a Bush supporter. Also, one of the computer software engineers who tested the software had given $25,000 to the Republican National Committee in 2000.

The Diebold conspiracy theory was so idiotic, it was debunked in Salon magazine, of all places. And thats a publication with articles about anal sex and pollution on Mars.

Yet and still, during the official count of the 2004 Electoral College vote, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-Ohio, objected to the reading of Ohios votes, requiring both houses to return to their respective chambers and debate the Ohio results for two hours before returning to finish the tally.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), right, and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH) speak at a press conference to announce their objection to the certification of Ohios electoral votes on January 6, 2005, in Washington, DC. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Thirty-one Democrats in the House objected to the counting of Ohios votes; one member of the Senate objected. (Guess who?)

There was even a book, Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen? by Steven F. Freeman and Joel Bleifuss. (Spoiler alert: Youre damn right it was stolen!) Their proof was that the exit polls showed Kerry ahead, so to hell with actual results on Election Day.

The real cheating in the 2020 election and every other election in recent memory wasnt that Iran, China, or Chavez were manipulating our voting machines. It wasnt the ballot harvesting allegedly exposed in Dinesh DSouzas movie, 2,000 Mules. It was what liberals were doing right in front of our faces.

Democrats have what are known as unmotivated voters. As such, they need battalions of Get Out the Vote activists to track down the bored and the lazy. (Yes, the same marginalized people whom liberals claim are having their lifelong dreams of voting dashed by GOP voter suppression schemes cant be bothered to get out of bed on Election Day.)

Over the years, Democrats have lured their voters to the polls with a free ride, a box lunch, and walking-around money even a gurney, if thats what it takes. Volunteers give the voters detailed, childlike instructions on exactly how to fill out their ballots. Luckily, unionized government workers have plenty of time on their hands to organize voters.

Without these sorts of military-style operations, the day after the election, Democrats will find out half their voters overslept and forgot to vote.

Consequently, COVID was like manna from heaven for the left. It provided the perfect excuse to demand even more time for volunteers to round up the uninterested. No-excuse absentee ballots, mail-in ballots, drop boxes, months of early voting all of it: Advantage Democrats.

Until Republicans stop being pushovers and shut downallmail-in balloting, all early voting, all drop boxes, and pass a federal law requiring ONE DAY, a NATIONAL HOLIDAY, to vote (which is fully within Congress constitutional authority), Democrats have a gigantic, unfair advantage. Thats not cheating. Its being smarter than Mitch McConnell.

More here:
Ann Coulter: Breaking: Trump Was Listening to People as ... - Breitbart

Read More..

Artificial intelligence was supposed to transform health care. It hasn’t. – POLITICO

Companies come in promising the world and often dont deliver, said Bob Wachter, head of the department of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. When I look for examples of true AI and machine learning thats really making a difference, theyre pretty few and far between. Its pretty underwhelming.

Administrators say algorithms the software that processes data from outside companies dont always work as advertised because each health system has its own technological framework. So hospitals are building out engineering teams and developing artificial intelligence and other technology tailored to their own needs.

But its slow going. Research based on job postings shows health care behind every industry except construction in adopting AI.

The Food and Drug Administration has taken steps to develop a model for evaluating AI, but it is still in its early days. There are questions about how regulators can monitor algorithms as they evolve and rein in the technologys detrimental aspects, such as bias that threaten to exacerbate health care inequities.

Sometimes theres an assumption that AI is working, and its just a matter of adopting it, which is not necessarily true, said Florenta Teodoridis, a professor at the University of Southern Californias business school whose research focuses on AI. She added that being unable to understand why an algorithm came to a certain result is fine for things like predicting the weather. But in health care, its impact is potentially life-changing.

Despite the obstacles, the tech industry is still enthusiastic about AIs potential to transform health care.

The transition is slightly slower than I hoped but well on track for AI to be better than most radiologists at interpreting many different types of medical images by 2026, Hinton told POLITICO via email. He said he never suggested that we should get rid of radiologists, but that we should let AI read scans for them.

If hes right, artificial intelligence will start taking on more of the rote tasks in medicine, giving doctors more time to spend with patients to reach the right diagnosis or develop a comprehensive treatment plan.

I see us moving as a medical community to a better understanding of what it can and cannot do, said Lara Jehi, chief research information officer for the Cleveland Clinic. It is not going to replace radiologists, and it shouldnt replace radiologists.

Radiology is one of the most promising use cases for AI. The Mayo Clinic has a clinical trial evaluating an algorithm that aims to reduce the hours-long process oncologists and physicists undertake to map out a surgical plan for removing complicated head and neck tumors.

An algorithm can do the job in an hour, said John D. Halamka, president of Mayo Clinic Platform: Weve taken 80 percent of the human effort out of it. The technology gives doctors a blueprint they can review and tweak without having to do the basic physics themselves, he said.

NYU Langone Health has also experimented with using AI in radiology. The health system has collaborated with Facebooks Artificial Intelligence Research group to reduce the time it takes to get an MRI from one hour to 15 minutes. Daniel Sodickson, a radiological imaging expert at NYU Langone who worked on the research, sees opportunity in AIs ability to downsize the amount of data doctors need to review.

When I look for examples of true AI and machine learning thats really making a difference, theyre pretty few and far between. Its pretty underwhelming.

Bob Wachter, head of the department of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco

Covid has accelerated AIs development. Throughout the pandemic, health providers and researchers shared data on the disease and anonymized patient data to crowdsource treatments.

Microsoft and Adaptive Biotechnologies, which partner on machine learning to better understand the immune system, put their technology to work on patient data to see how the virus affected the immune system.

The amount of knowledge thats been obtained and the amount of progress has just been really exciting, said Peter Lee, corporate vice president of research and incubations at Microsoft.

There are other success stories. For example, Ochsner Health in Louisiana built an AI model for detecting early signs of sepsis, a life-threatening response to infection. To convince nurses to adopt it, the health system created a response team to monitor the technology for alerts and take action when needed.

Im calling it our care traffic control, said Denise Basow, chief digital officer at Ochsner Health. Since implementation, she said, death from sepsis is declining.

The biggest barrier to the use of artificial intelligence in health care has to do with infrastructure.

Health systems need to enable algorithms to access patient data. Over the last several years, large, well-funded systems have invested in moving their data into the cloud, creating vast data lakes ready to be consumed by artificial intelligence. But thats not as easy for smaller players.

Another problem is that every health system is unique in its technology and the way it treats patients. That means an algorithm may not work as well everywhere.

Over the last year, an independent study on a widely used sepsis detection algorithm from EHR giant Epic showed poor results in real-world settings, suggesting where and how hospitals used the AI mattered.

This quandary has led top health systems to build out their own engineering teams and develop AI in-house.

That could create complications down the road. Unless health systems sell their technology, its unlikely to undergo the type of vetting that commercial software would. That could allow flaws to go unfixed for longer than they might otherwise. Its not just that the health systems are implementing AI while no ones looking. Its also that the stakeholders in artificial intelligence, in health care, technology and government, havent agreed upon standards.

A lack of quality data which gives algorithms material to work with is another significant barrier in rolling out the technology in health care settings.

Over the last several years, large, well-funded systems have invested in moving their data into the cloud, creating vast data lakes ready to be consumed by artificial intelligence.|Elaine Thompson/AP Photo

Much data comes from electronic health records but is often siloed among health care systems, making it more difficult to gather sizable data sets. For example, a hospital may have complete data on one visit, but the rest of a patients medical history is kept elsewhere, making it harder to draw inferences about how to proceed in caring for the patient.

We have pieces and parts, but not the whole, said Aneesh Chopra, who served as the governments chief technology officer under former President Barack Obama and is now president of data company CareJourney.

While some health systems have invested in pulling data from a variety of sources into a single repository, not all hospitals have the resources to do that.

Health care also has strong privacy protections that limit the amount and type of data tech companies can collect, leaving the sector behind others in terms of algorithmic horsepower.

Importantly, not enough strong data on health outcomes is available, making it more difficult for providers to use AI to improve how they treat patients.

That may be changing. A recent series of studies on a sepsis algorithm included copious details on how to use the technology in practice and documented physician adoption rates. Experts have hailed the studies as a good template for how future AI studies should be conducted.

But working with health care data is also more difficult than in other sectors because it is highly individualized.

We found that even internally across our different locations and sites, these models dont have a uniform performance, said Jehi of the Cleveland Clinic.

And the stakes are high if things go wrong. The number of paths that patients can take are very different than the number of paths that I can take when Im on Amazon trying to order a product, Wachter said.

Health experts also worry that algorithms could amplify bias and health care disparities.

For example, a 2019 study found that a hospital algorithm more often pushed white patients toward programs aiming to provide better care than Black patients, even while controlling for the level of sickness.

Last year, the FDA published a set of guidelines for using AI as a medical device, calling for the establishment of good machine learning practices, oversight of how algorithms behave in real-world scenarios and development of research methods for rooting out bias.

The agency subsequently published more specific guidelines on machine learning in radiological devices, requiring companies to outline how the technology is supposed to perform and provide evidence that it works as intended. The FDA has cleared more than 300 AI-enabled devices, largely in radiology, since 1997.

Regulating algorithms is a challenge, particularly given how quickly the technology advances. The FDA is attempting to head that off by requiring companies to institute real-time monitoring and submit plans on future changes.

But in-house AI isnt subject to FDA oversight. Bakul Patel, former head of the FDAs Center for Devices and Radiological Health and now Googles senior director for global digital health strategy and regulatory affairs, said that the FDA is thinking about how it might regulate noncommercial artificial intelligence inside of health systems, but he adds, theres no easy answer.

FDA has to thread the needle between taking enough action to mitigate flaws in algorithms while also not stifling AIs potential, he said.

Some argue that public-private standards for AI would help advance the technology. Groups, including the Coalition for Health AI, whose members include major health systems and universities as well as Google and Microsoft, are working on this approach.

But the standards they envision would be voluntary, which could blunt their impact if not widely adopted.

See original here:
Artificial intelligence was supposed to transform health care. It hasn't. - POLITICO

Read More..

Parker to Lead Artificial Intelligence Research and Education Initiative at UT – Tennessee Today

Lynne Parker is returning to the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, after completing a four-year post as deputy United States chief technology officer and director of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office within the White House. In that role, Parker oversaw the development and implementation of the national artificial intelligence strategy.

Starting September 6, Parker will serve as associate vice chancellor and director of the new AI Tennessee Initiative at UT, where she will lead the universitys strategic vision and strategy for multidisciplinary artificial intelligence education and research. The initiative is designed to increase UTs funded research, expand the number of students developing interdisciplinary skills and competencies related to AI, and position the university and the state of Tennessee as national and global leaders in the data-intensive knowledge economy.

My goal has always been to advance AI initiatives and policy to the benefit of the American people, and indeed our world. I am proud of the accomplishments we have made over three administrations, together with colleagues from across government, academia, and industry, said Parker. In my new role, I look forward to advancing Tennessees engagement in this work by bringing together the broad perspectives and expertise of faculty and students from across many disciplines, not only on the UT Knoxville campus but also with partner institutions and organizations across the state.

Before joining the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in 2018, Parker served as interim dean of UTs Tickle College of Engineering. She has also served as the National Science Foundations division director of information and intelligent systems.

I am thrilled Lynne is returning to UT to deepen and give focus to the research we are doing in AI, both here at UT and throughout Tennessee, said Vice Chancellor for Research Deborah Crawford. AI is increasingly important to our economy and our society, and Lynnes depth of knowledge and unique expertise will ensure our work in this space is meaningful, thoughtful, and supportive of peoples lives and livelihoods.

Lynnes involvement in shaping AI policy for the country over the last four years will be of enormous benefit to our students as we endeavor to provide new and exciting opportunities for students who want to major, minor, or take courses in the field, said Provost and Senior Vice Chancellor John Zomchick.

A Knoxville native, Parker completed her masters degree in UTs Min H. Kao Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She joined UTs faculty in 2002 when she founded the Distributed Intelligence Laboratory, where she broadened research and knowledge into multirobot systems, sensor networks, machine learning, and humanrobot interaction.

Parker was named a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence in 2022. She is also a Fellow of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and a Distinguished Member of the Association for Computing Machinery. In addition to contributing to several conferences over the years, Parker chaired the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation and served as editor-in-chief of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society Conference Editorial Board and editor of IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

CONTACT:

Tyra Haag (865-974-5460, ttucker@utk.edu)

David Goddard (865-974-0683, david.goddard@utk.edu)

Read more here:
Parker to Lead Artificial Intelligence Research and Education Initiative at UT - Tennessee Today

Read More..

Artificial intelligence and the super app – McKinsey

QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey recently sat down with Selim Turki, head of data and AI at Uber-owned mobility company Careem, to discuss the latest trends in advanced analytics and artificial intelligence. Far from a dry discussion of theory, the conversation coalesced around several fascinating use cases in which Careem is using AI to make a difference in peoples lives. We discussed how AI is being leveraged to improve customer and driver security through targeted facial-recognition checks to ensure drivers (captains) are who they say they are. We also discussed how AI is being used to provide customers with the most accurate and up-to-date estimated times of arrival (ETAs) by factoring in a host of conditions, including local weather conditions, prayer times, and even iftar times during Ramadan. Along the way, we discussed what it means to be an AI first company and the outlook for AI techand talentin the region.

QuantumBlack: Was AI always an important part of Careems growth journey? How has AIs role evolved since Careems inception?

Selim Turki: We started our journey as a ride-hailing company booking journeys for corporate clients. We were initially booking cars manually, without a data server, before introducing more advanced systems to deliver more efficient, personalized experiences. Since day one, our mission has been to simplify and improve the lives of peopleparticularly our customers and captains. We quickly understood that maintaining high reliability for our dynamic marketplace 24/7 was a complex process that needed to be driven by instant decision making through continuous automation at scale.

We began processing real-time data, using algorithms and machine learning [ML] models to solve some of the core issues for our ride-hailing marketplace, including matching customers and captains efficiently, shaping our demand and supply via surge pricing, calculating accurate ETAs for our captains, and improving our maps and location search functionality.

Today, we are scaling the Middle East, North Africa, and Pakistan [MENAP] regions first super app. AI is in our DNA as we invest more in platform capabilities and team skill sets. Our hiring strategy is focused on growing a diverse team of data and machine learning scientists to build out our in-house experimentation and machine learning platforms.

QuantumBlack: Has the adoption of these new AI techniques changed the way Careem works to serve its customers? How has this affected business teams within the organization?

Selim Turki: We use several AI techniques depending on the type of service we offer in our super app. All of these techniques are directed at three particular needs:

We use AI to factor in prayer times, iftar time during Ramadan, and weather conditions to better predict the ETA accuracy of when the food will be delivered to our customers.

QuantumBlack: How many AI practitioners work with Careem today?

Selim Turki: We have dozens of AI and machine learning experts who are driving forward our strategy of being an AI-first company. Part of our plan is to educate the entire organization on the topic, inviting our engineers and business counterparts to use AI to solve some of their challenges. We have also designed a program dedicated to new college graduates to ensure future talent is up to date with the latest AI techniques and to encourage them to further develop their skills.

QuantumBlack: How do you integrate AI into your decision making now? How do you stay ahead of competition in the market?

Selim Turki: AI is part of Careems decision-making framework. We set quarterly goals to measure and assess the usage and impact of our ML models on the different business streams.

We use rigorous statistical methodologies, taking confounding effects into account, to accurately estimate the models impact on different areas of the business.

To help our data and AI teams stay on top of the changes happening in the industry, we have started collaborating with regional academic institutions to solve some of the most significant super-app challenges and to identify exciting new opportunities for AI innovation.

We publish our progress on the Careem engineering blog and invite third parties to collaborate with us on specific areas related to AI.

We also contribute to open-source data communities and offer our work to other AI and ML professionals.

QuantumBlack: Can you share a recent instance of how AI fundamentally changed the way Careem does business with its customers or captains?

Selim Turki: With any digital platform, fraudsters will look for loopholes to exploit, whether through creating fake-identity accounts or exploring ways to hijack open accounts. Our team uses advanced AI techniques focusing on the identity of users to detect and prevent losses stemming from fraud. One system we use, called Crazy Wall, uses a relational graph convolutional network to map different data points of a customers identity. It also identifies characteristics shared across different identities to detect and mass-block fraudulent patterns across customer or captain activities.

QuantumBlack: AI talent has been a key challenge for companies in the region. How have you dealt with the regions structural talent issues?

Selim Turki: The regions tech talent is growing rapidly, and its exciting to see more specialists choosing to come to the region to make an impact in some of the fastest-growing countries in the world. Its also exciting to see a growing number of local university graduates specializing in AI. Were fortunate to have attracted a strong community of AI talent both locally and from surrounding markets to Careem. Our teams are building tech across various areas, including e-commerce, technology-enabled logistics, maps, identity, and fintech. They can solve complex and meaningful challenges at scale thanks to Careems deep tech expertise, strong regulatory relationships, local presence, and increasingly specialized global teams that are structured to operate as autonomous start-ups. Our team of more than 400 engineers and developers are empowered to develop cutting-edge technology every day. Being a remote-first company allows us to attract talent from across the world who want to have an impact on the MENAP region. This means that the opportunities to gain new perspectives and solve complex, real-world challenges alongside talented peers are endless.

QuantumBlack: Do you think the talent-supply challenges are here to stay? What is your ambition for attracting cutting-edge AI practitioners to Careem in the next three to five years?

Selim Turki: As AI becomes more widely used across industries, the demand for specialists will continue to rise. We need to inspire the next generation of data and AI specialists to be curious and gain exposure to the workplace at an earlier age.

At Careem, we are focused on building an AI culture where opportunities to learn and thrive are fostered by adapting, mentoring, and sharing within our AI communities and beyond. We are also hoping to make AI more accessible to stakeholders across Careem with initiatives like no-code AI, where AI is accessible without existing coding skill sets, as well as partnerships with AI labs to democratize AI usage across the company.

QuantumBlack: How will AI specifically change the mobility space in MENAP? Are there any white spaces where MENAP companies could be global first movers?

Selim Turki: The global mobility space is at a very nascent phase, with considerable opportunities to solve using AI techniques. At Careem, we have the vision of creating an internet-like network to transport packages of atoms, like how the internet transports packets of bits, called the AtomNet.

The AtomNet provides an open-network platform that connects, manages, and routes multimode autonomous vehicles [AVs] to make transport ubiquitous. Similar to how packets can travel across multiple modalities of transport (Wi-Fi, DSL, cable, and fiber), packages on the AtomNet can travel in autonomous motorcycles, cars, vans, trucks, ships, drones, and airplanes. We foresee an AtomNet industry ecosystem with open package headers and protocols to allow package switching and efficient package mobility. With open protocols, coordination costs will drop significantly, and local, national, and international transport gaps will narrow over the years.

AtomNet will support Careems quick commerce, fulfillment centers, restaurants, groceries, dark stores, transportation, and cross-border commerce. We see the epicenter of AtomNet starting in the UAE due to its progressive regulation and culture of innovation.

QuantumBlack: AI is still in its nascency in the broader context of this region. How do you think this will change in the next five to ten years?

Selim Turki: A long and exciting journey is ahead of us in the wider Middle East. With the growing pace of technology, more and more regional corporations will use AI to enhance their products and offer a better experience to customers.

At Careem, our primary focus will continue to be building the internet platform of the Middle East to provide access to our servicesusing data and AI as a core to simplify and improve customers lives. The meta goal is to delight all our users and personalize their experience through data and AI in every service offered through our super app.

The current trend of making trade-offs by improving AI prediction will be strengthened at the cost of short-term factors such as ingestion costs, customer experience, and operational excellence. We will continue investing in our data streams to help our models learn, build, and manage algorithms at scale. Moreover, real-time feedback loops will continue to decipher customer behavior and how it evolves by using our services through leveraging more intelligent software and hardware. Some of the emerging machine learning models will be tailored more to our region, considering language, customer behavior, and product relevance.

Our goal is to provide the simplest and best possible customer experience. To make things simple, you have to make them intuitive. To make things intuitively simple, we need to:

View original post here:
Artificial intelligence and the super app - McKinsey

Read More..

Ether is up 100% since its bottom in June, massively outperforming bitcoin – CNBC

Ether has hugely outperformed bitcoin since both cryptocurrencies formed a bottom in June 2022. Ether's superior gains have come as investors anticipate a major upgrade to the ethereum blockchain called "the merge."

Yuriko Nakao | Getty Images

Since finding a bottom in mid-June, ether has massively outperformed bitcoin as investors anticipate a major upgrade to the ethereum blockchain.

Bitcoin hit a low of $17,601 on June 19 and is up around 31% since then as of Friday's trading price, according to CoinDesk data.

Ether also hit its recent low on June 19 at $880.93, but has surged 106% since then.

The huge divergence in performance in the two cryptocurrencies come down to one major factor: a big upgrade in the ethereum blockchain. Ether is the native cryptocurrency of the ethereum network.

Ethereum's upgrade, called the "merge," is slated to take place on Sept. 15 after numerous delays. The blockchain will change from a so-called proof-of-work system to a model called proof-of-stake. A full explanation of the merge can be found here.

Proponents say that the move will make the ethereum network faster and more energy-efficient.

"The upcoming Ethereum Merge is the biggest narrative in crypto right now and explains why Ether has left Bitcoin in its wake in the past month," Antoni Trenchev, co-founder of crypto trading platform Nexo, told CNBC via email.

"A blockchain that pitches itself as being energy efficient will always capture the imagination of the masses and that's why Ether has the wind in its sails ahead of the Merge, a move to proof of stake."

But the recent ether rally, which has seen its price double in the space of two months, has been rapid.

One analyst said that the rally could continue but there may be some resistance at around the $2,000 mark. Ether was trading at $1,814 on Friday.

Jacob Joseph, research analyst at data service CryptoCompare, said that with no Federal Open Market Committee meeting scheduled for August and stocks seeing a rebound, "it is reasonable to believe Ethereum can still rally as we edge closer to the Merge."

"However ... $2,000 has proved to be a major resistance for Ether and the asset needs more wind behind its sail to break that level."

Joseph added that bitcoin is unlikely to outperform ether in the near term.

There are risks to the ether price rally, according to Trenchev.

"Any further (unlikely) delays to the mid-September Merge will see an unwind in a large portion of Ether's 50% rally since mid-July," he said.

There is always the chance that traders take profits too on the huge rally, Trenchev said.

"The Merge, if successful, might well prove to be a 'buy the rumour sell the news' type event, given the jaw-dropping gains we've seen in Ether," Trenchev added.

Go here to see the original:
Ether is up 100% since its bottom in June, massively outperforming bitcoin - CNBC

Read More..

What Quantum Computing Will Mean for the Future Artificial Intelligence – ReadWrite

Todays artificial intelligence (AI) systems are only as good as the data theyre trained on. The AI industry is currently taking advantage of large datasets to train AI models and make them more useful. However, as these datasets are becoming limited, researchers are exploring other ways to improve AI algorithms. One such way is quantum computing. It is a new frontier of computer science that will enable better AI algorithms shortly.

Atoms make up our world, and they and their constituents have baffling yet interesting properties. For example, electrons have spin and orbit that can be either up. In addition, they can be in any of the infinite discrete energy levels. These properties determine the quantum states of atoms. At a subatomic level, everything exists as quantum states rather than as traditional logical on or off values. This phenomenon gave rise to quantum computing. It has the potential to change how we see artificial intelligence forever.

Quantum computing is an entirely different way of studying the world around us. It does not just focus on the properties of atoms and molecules. It takes a look at the subatomic properties of atoms that are actually in superposition. That is, they exist in multiple states at the same time. This is one of the principles of quantum mechanics that enable subatomic particles to exist as both particles and waves at the same time.

These principles are strange and counterintuitive. According to them, a computing system cannot only store and process data in binary bits, 0s and 1s. Or in more electronic engineering terms, the state of off and on of an electronic switch. It can also store and process data in superposed states of not on or off but the combination thereof. By harnessing these principles, quantum computers can solve complex problems much faster than traditional computers.

Quantum computers are a variety of different supercomputers based on quantum mechanics. These quantum computers use the laws of quantum mechanics to process information. That means they can find patterns in big data that are almost impossible to find with conventional computers. This way, they are fundamentally different from the computers we use today.

When it comes to artificial intelligence, quantum computing can analyze a wider variety of data. At the same time, they can come to better conclusions than computers today. Conventional computers can only process information as either 1s or 0s. Quantum computers can process information in multiple states known as qubits at once. That enables them to analyze a wider variety of data and come to better conclusions than computers can today.

Artificial intelligence has come a long way in the past few years. It has been able to generate realistic 3D images and videos. In addition, it is beginning to embrace quantum computing. That has given rise to quantum AI. Artificial intelligence now leverages quantum computers. And their full integration will be a technological revolution of the century.

There are several benefits of using quantum AI in creative industries. I have already made it clear it can handle large data sets faster and more efficiently than traditional AI technologies. It can also identify patterns that are difficult for regular computers to spot. Furthermore, it can combine and rearrange existing ideas. Hence it can create new ideas in ways that any human cannot imagine possible.

One of the biggest hurdles for artificial intelligence today is training the machine to do something useful. For example, we might have a model that can correctly identify a dog in a photo. But the model will need to be trained with tens of thousands of images for it to recognize the subtle differences between a beagle, a poodle, and a Great Dane. This process is what AI researchers call training. They use it to teach AI algorithms to make predictions in new situations.

Quantum computing can make this training process faster and more accurate. It will allow AI researchers to use more data than they have ever used before. It can process large amounts of data in 1s and 0s and the combination thereof which will enable quantum computers to come to more accurate conclusions than traditional computers. In other words, AI researchers can use larger datasets to train AI models to be more accurate and better at decision-making.

One of the most exciting predictions for quantum computing in artificial intelligence is the potential to break through language barriers. AI models can currently understand one language the language used to train them. so if we need AI to understand a different language, we shall need to teach it from scratch. However, quantum computing can help AI models break through language barriers. It will allow us to train models in one language and translate them into a different language effortlessly.

That will enable AI to understand and interpret different languages simultaneously. What this will do is create a global AI that can speak multiple languages. Another exciting prediction for the future of AI with quantum computing is the potential to build models with more accurate decision-making skills: Quantum computing will allow using larger datasets to train models. Hence AI will be able to make more accurate decisions that will be especially helpful for financial models, which often have a high rate of inaccuracy because of the limited data used to train them.

Artificial intelligence is already improving the performance of quantum computers. This trend will only continue in the future. The following are some reasons why:

The potential of quantum computing is limitless, but its integration into artificial intelligence will produce a technology that will be rather powerful than anything we have today. The new technology will enable machines to learn and self-evolve. It will make them exponentially better at solving complex problems and developing self-learning algorithms that will drive efficiency in sectors such as finance or healthcare.

Quantum AI systems will be able to process large amounts of information quickly and accurately. That will open up a new world of possibilities for businesses and individuals. They will also be able to solve complex problems that are impossible for even the most advanced conventional computer systems.

Nevertheless, we must remember that these technologies are relatively new; we are still discovering new ways to use quantum computing. Therefore, we must be aware of the latest technology to take advantage of new opportunities as they come along.

The rise of quantum computing will change the way we interact with AI in the future. That means we must stay informed so we can prepare for the changes and make the most of this exciting technology.

Image Credit:

Chisom is a physicist and a tech enthusiast interested in web3, cybersecurity, blockchain application, and quantum information science; he writes about the advancements therein. When he is not writing about tech, he is either crafting absorbing copy for blogs, marketing, and PR, reading his favorite books, or singing at the top of his lungs. He is a shine-through writer with a massive readership.

Original post:
What Quantum Computing Will Mean for the Future Artificial Intelligence - ReadWrite

Read More..

Artificial Intelligence Is Not the Same as Artificial Consciousness – ChristianHeadlines.com

In June, a Google employee who claimed the company had created a sentient artificial intelligence bot was placed on administrative leave.Blake Lemoine, part of Googles Responsible AI (artificial intelligence) program, had been interacting with a language AI known as Language Model for Dialogue Applications, or LaMDA. When the algorithm began talking about rights and personhood, Lemoine decided his superiors and eventually the public needed to know. To him, it was clear the program had become sentient, with the ability to feel, think, and experience life like a human.

Google denied the claim (which is exactly what they woulddo, isnt it?). There was no evidence that LaMDA was sentient (and lots of evidence against it), said a spokesperson. The Atlantics Stephen Marche agreed: The fact that LaMDA in particular has been the center of attention is, frankly, a little quaint. Convincing chatbots are far from groundbreaking tech at this point.

True, but they arethe plot of a thousand science fiction novels.So, the question remains, is a truly sentient AI even possible? How could code develop the capacity for feelings, experiences, or intentionality? Even if our best algorithms can one day perfectly mirror the behavior of people, would they be conscious?

How one answers such questions depends on ones anthropology. What are people? Are we merely computers made of flesh? Or is there something more to us than the sum of our parts, a true ghost in the machine?A true ghost in the shell?

These kinds of questions about humans and the things that humans make reflect what philosopher David Chalmers has called the hard problem of consciousness.In every age, even if strictly material evidence for the soul remains elusive, people have sensed that personhood, willpower, and first-person subjective experiences mean something. Christians are among those who believe that we are more than the stuff of our bodies, though Christians, unlike others, would be quick to add, but not less. There is something to us and the world that goes beyond the physical because there is a non-material, eternal God behind it all.

Christians also hold that there are qualitativedifferences between people and algorithms, between life and nonliving things like rocks and stars, between image bearers and other living creatures. Though much about sentience and consciousness remains a mystery, personhood rests on the solid metaphysical ground of a personal and powerful Creator.

Materialists have a much harder problem declaring such distinctions. By denying the existence of anything other than the physical stuff of the universe, they dont merely erase the substance of certain aspects of the human experience such as good, evil, purpose, and free will: Theres no real grounding for thinking of a person as unique, different, or valuable.

According to philosopher Thomas Metzinger, for example, in a conversation with Sam Harris, none of us ever was or had a self. Take brain surgery, Metzinger says. You peel back the skull and realize that there is only tissue, tissue made of the exact same components as everything else in the universe. Thus, he concludes, the concept of an individual person is meaningless, a purely linguistic construct designed to make sense of phenomena that arent there.

That kind of straightforward claim, though shocking to most people, is consistent within a purely materialist worldview. What quickly becomes inconsistent are claims of ethical norms or proper authority in a world without persons. In a world without a why or an ought, theres only is, which tends to be the prerogative of the powerful, a fact that Harris and Metzinger candidly acknowledge.

In a materialist world, any computational program could potentially become sentient simply by sufficiently mirroring (and even surpassing) human neurology. After all, in this worldview, theres no qualitative difference between people and robots, only degrees of complexity.This line of thinking, however, quickly collapses into dissonance. Are we really prepared to look at the ones and zeros of our computer programs the same way we look at a newborn baby? Are we prepared to extend human rights and privileges to our machines and programs?

In Marvels 2015 film Avengers: Age of Ultron,lightning from Thors hammer hits a synthetic body programmed with an AI algorithm.A new hero, Vision, comes to life and helps save the day. Its one of the more entertaining movie scenes to wrestle with questions of life and consciousness.

Even in the Marvel universe, no one would believe that a mere AI algorithm, even one designed by Tony Stark, could be sentient, no matter how sophisticated it was. In order to get to consciousness, there needed to be a secret sauce, in this case lightning from a Nordic hammer or power from an Infinity Stone.In the same way, as stunning as advances in artificial intelligence are, a consciousnessthat is truly human requires a spark of the Divine.

Publication date: August 19, 2022

Photo courtesy: Aideal Hwa/Unsplash

The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Christian Headlines.

BreakPointis a program of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. BreakPoint commentaries offer incisive content people can't find anywhere else; content that cuts through the fog of relativism and the news cycle with truth and compassion. Founded by Chuck Colson (1931 2012) in 1991 as a daily radio broadcast, BreakPoint provides a Christian perspective on today's news and trends. Today, you can get it in written and a variety of audio formats: on the web, the radio, or your favorite podcast app on the go.

John Stonestreet is President of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, and radio host of BreakPoint, a daily national radio program providing thought-provoking commentaries on current events and life issues from a biblical worldview. John holds degrees from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (IL) and Bryan College (TN),and is the co-author of Making Sense of Your World: A Biblical Worldview.

Follow this link:
Artificial Intelligence Is Not the Same as Artificial Consciousness - ChristianHeadlines.com

Read More..

Now That Authorities Have Shut Down Tornado Cash, Is Bitcoin Next? – Bitcoin Magazine

Despite being an automated, decentralized version of a typical cryptocurrency mixer, Tornado Cash was sanctioned by the U.S. government last week as the Treasury Departments Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added Ethereum addresses associated with the tool to its specially designated nationals and blocked persons (SDN) list.

Much has been written about the legal aspects of the Treasury Departments move. Instead of embarking on arguably much needed advocacy to dispute the legal grounds of such a move, this article seeks to objectively explore the technical intricacies of Tornado Cash and its sanction, as well as evaluate potential risks that could bleed into Bitcoin in the future.

At its core, a mixer receives users cryptocurrency deposits, which it pools or tumbles together before enabling each user to withdraw the same amount of coins it deposited. By doing so, users receive fresh coins that arent related to the ones they deposited, which can offer them a great deal of forward-looking privacy.

Most mixers are centralized, run by an entity or business that collects fees for the aforementioned services.

Tornado Cash, on the other hand, is a cryptocurrency mixer deployed as a smart contract on the Ethereum blockchain. Hence, it is more akin to a robot than an entity it can be thought of as an automated version of a typical cryptocurrency mixer. It still works like a regular mixer, though. Users deposit cryptocurrency into the Tornado Cash contract, which pools the funds and enables withdrawals unlinked to the deposits.

Tornado Cash ensures privacy and enables trustless user withdrawals by leveraging robust cryptography techniques, with proofs known as zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive argument of knowledge (zk-SNARK) is at its core.

In essence, zk-SNARK and zero-knowledge proofs in general allow an entity to prove a statement about a secret without revealing the secret. In the context of Tornado Cash, it allows the user to prove they are entitled to withdraw a certain amount of coins from the smart contract without handing out information about their deposits.

SNARKs in the context of Tornado Cash allow depositors to move money into the pool and have an off-chain deposit note they can use to withdraw it to any other account, Michael Lewellen, security solutions architect at smart contract security firm OpenZeppelin, told Bitcoin Magazine. The fact that the deposit note has zero ties to the deposit account is where the SNARKs are used to ensure privacy.

Beyond the privacy benefits, the deposit note also allows a greater level of security and control for the user as it enables them to trustlessly withdraw their funds from the mixer at any time. This feature makes Tornado Cash akin to a non-custodial service, as these redeemable notes function as cryptographic keys that unlock the users funds.

I think its still fair to call it non-custodial, Lewellen said. Youre essentially given a new cryptographic key proof related to that specific deposit that can then be used by the withdrawing account to pull the money out.

Cryptocurrency mixers have for years been targeted by the U.S. government and its enforcement agencies. One would think that Tornado Cash, being a piece of code autonomously living on a blockchain instead of a centrally-run business, would be immune to such targeting. Still, OFAC came after it.

The idea that the U.S. Treasury Departments can sanction a smart contract cryptocurrency mixer like Tornado Cash seems far fetched and odd.However, it sits at the intersection of the departments previous sanctions of cryptocurrency mixers (in reasoning) and blockchain addresses (in approach).

The sanctioning of Tornado Cash represents OFACs second-ever sanction on a cryptocurrency mixer. The first, on Blender, happened in May 2022.

OFAC said in a statement that Tornado Cash has been used to launder more than $7 billion worth of virtual currency since its creation in 2019, highlighting the alleged funneling of over $455 million stolen by the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK)-sponsored Lazarus hacking group, which was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2019.

More specifically, the statement details:

Tornado is being designated pursuant to E.O. 13694, as amended, for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, a cyber-enabled activity originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States that is reasonably likely to result in, or has materially contributed to, a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic health or financial stability of the United States and that has the purpose or effect of causing a significant misappropriation of funds or economic resources, trade secrets, personal identifiers, or financial information for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain.

According to the U.S. Treasury Departments website, Executive Order (E.O.) 13694 focuses on harms caused by malicious cyber-enabled activities, which it judges as any act that is primarily accomplished through or facilitated by computers or other electronic devices. It directs the Secretary of the Treasury to impose sanctions on the persons he or she determines to be responsible for, or complicit in, the activities leading to those harms.

Blenders sanction was also pursuant to E.O. 13694. Tornado Cashs situation, however, raised some eyebrows because of the many nuances involved in its sanction.

Tornado Cash is a mixer, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) considers mixers to be money transmitters hence being susceptible to regulations and enforcement. At the same time, however, Tornado Cash is open-source code, and the U.S. ruled in Bernstein v. Department of Justice in the 1990s that code is speech. Hence the paradox.

Putting the paradox and legal nuances aside, things which might take years to dispute, in practice OFAC might have simply looked at a cryptocurrency mixer being used to launder illegal funds and decided to crack down on it regardless of the distributed nature of the tool.

Even though OFACs SDN list is more often than not leveraged for persons or entities, the Treasury Department has, since 2018, spelled out that it can and will add cryptocurrency addresses to the list as it deems necessary to protect U.S. national security interests.

To strengthen our efforts to combat the illicit use of digital currency transactions under our existing authorities, OFAC may include as identifiers on the SDN List specific digital currency addresses associated with blocked persons, per the Treasury Department website. OFAC may add digital currency addresses to the SDN List to alert the public of specific digital currency identifiers associated with a blocked person.

Counterintuitively, and heres the hard truth, the transparent nature of blockchains more broadly along with specific characteristics of the Ethereum blockchain facilitated the Treasury Department to overextend its authority and mingle reasoning and approach to add Tornado Cash to the SDN list.

Ethereum leverages a model based on accounts. According to the Ethereum foundation, an account is an entity with an ether (ETH) balance that can send transactions on Ethereum and it can be either user-controlled or a smart contract. Accounts can receive, hold and send ETH and tokens on the Ethereum blockchain as well as interact with smart contracts.

As a default, deployed smart contracts on Ethereum have a fixed address which other accounts, owned by users or other contracts, can interact with. Therefore, since OFAC can sanction blockchain addresses through its SDN list, it was trivial for the enforcement body to sanction Tornado Cash.

So, is it then just a matter of time until OFAC or similar organizations begin coming after tools in Bitcoin land?

There is arguably little limit to what enforcement agencies such as OFAC can do to reach their objectives, as evidenced by the Tornado Cash case. But many decentralized tools were built in response to the states overarching control in the first place and are designed to prevent such actions.

Does that mean Bitcoin is immune to the threats that the Ethereum ecosystem is currently facing? Not necessarily.

As explained above, and judging by the Treasury Departments statements and guidelines, OFACs sanction on Tornado Cash appears to have been a coupling of two of the agencys practices: the goal of cracking down on virtual currency mixers facilitating money laundering and its ability to add blockchain addresses to its SDN list. Bitcoin is well positioned to mitigate against the former, and while the latter poses a real threat, this is where Nakamotos design proves more resilient. Heres why.

Bitcoin privacy tools, namely CoinJoins, are also leveraged by criminals to launder money which also puts them on the radar of regulators.

Earlier this year, the U.K.s National Crime Agency (NCA) called for the regulation of Bitcoin CoinJoins, erroneously calling them decentralized mixers and citing Samourai and Wasabi wallets as two well-known mixers, per a report by the Financial Times. The agency claimed that such tools allow users to disguise transactions that are otherwise traceable on blockchains.

The NCA said regulation would force mixers to comply with money laundering laws, with an obligation to carry out customer checks and audit trails of currencies passing through the platforms, per the report.

As highlighted on Samourai Wallets follow-up blog post, there should be a clear distinction between a mixer and a CoinJoin as they are different tools.

While a mixer functions in the typical depositpoolwithdraw format, a CoinJoin is nothing more than a Bitcoin transaction. It differs from typical Bitcoin transactions because CoinJoins are really large ones with a specific format, but software like Samourai and Wasabi enable only the coordination of users to form that same transaction. In other words, there is no deposit, pooling or withdrawal of funds.

In fact, the EUs most prominent law enforcement agency, Europol, makes a clear distinction between mixers and CoinJoins. In its latest two Internet Organized Crime Threat Assessment (IOCTA) reports, Europols flagship strategic product that provides a law enforcement-focused assessment of evolving threats and developments in the area of cybercrime, the agency did not bundle mixers and CoinJoins into the same basket.

Criminals are increasingly converting their illicit earnings made in Bitcoin using cryptocurrency obfuscation methods like swapping services, mixers and coinjoins, it said in its 2021 IOCTA report. ...In the last few years, many different obfuscation methods have gained popularity, such as mixers, CoinJoin, swapping, crypto debit cards, Bitcoin ATMs, local trade and more.

Furthermore, in a 2020 report on Wasabi, Europol stated that users who download the wallet store all bitcoins locally, which means that the AML legislation including Europes latest AMLD5 (the 5th anti-money laundering directive) does not apply to this service.

Therefore, at the present time, it seems rather unlikely that the Treasury Department or other enforcement agencies would crack down on Bitcoin CoinJoins as cryptocurrency mixers and add them to the OFAC SDN list. But lets entertain the possibility that said agencies choose to do so.

Assuming that enforcement agencies can extend their authority to fit their needs, CoinJoins can come under sanctioning threats. But how could that be done? While there are no clear answers to that question, some possible scenarios do emerge.

The first natural scenario is an enforcement agency banning CoinJoins altogether. However unlikely, and while it would actually mean banning multiple-party Bitcoin transactions, such an action can in theory still be done. This threat, however, is sentient and the same threat that existed and arguably still exists for Bitcoin at large.

Perhaps a more down-to-earth scenario would be the sanctioning of CoinJoins coordinators instead. While this isnt applicable to JoinMarket in a straightforward way, given its maker and taker structure, in the cases of Samourai and Wasabi there are central coordinators that facilitate the CoinJoin transaction that is performed between the transacting parties. (This type of sanction is still unlikely given the structure of CoinJoins and as evidenced by Europols statement saying that AML rules dont apply to these tools. But, again, lets suppose the contrary.)

The action of sanctioning coordinators could be similar to the sanctioning of Tornado Cash in theory, but its very different in practice.

While OFAC, for instance, could simply add a CoinJoins coordinator to its SDN list, there is no single blockchain address it could use to represent that coordinator. As a gift from Bitcoins unspent transaction output (UTXO) model, coordinators change their address each round. This means that with Bitcoin CoinJoins there is no single point of contact to the Bitcoin blockchain and therefore this poses a key difference to Tornado Cashs smart contract structure based on Ethereums account based system.

In practice, OFAC would need to continuously analyze the blockchain to spot Bitcoin CoinJoins and retroactively add addresses to the SDN list. (There is one aspect that washes OFACs hands in this case it makes it clear that the SDN list is not exhaustive, meaning that if an address thats not listed is found to belong to an entity that is on the list, the sanction would still apply.)

Beyond the retroactive enforcement of such rules, the enforcement body would also need to know the identities of the Bitcoin users leveraging the services. While it is true that Bitcoin transactions and addresses arent anonymous, Bitcoins UTXO model increases robustness and resilience against this as well and most of the chain analysis work relies on (sometimes educated) guesses. This would be truly effective only if the addresses going in are either publicly known (for example from known hacks or hackers) or KYCd (known to exchanges and therefore law enforcement).

However, the fact that there is no direct or reliable way to tell which coordinator was used in a given CoinJoin round poses further challenges. While it can often be plausible to assume that the default coordinator was used in a round, such a statement cannot be reliably used against users because nothing prevents users from creating and using different coordinators, with the only obstacle being liquidity which can be solved with time.

If legislation turns around and decides CoinJoins should fall under the same rules as mixers despite their striking differences, and the above actions by enforcement agencies turn out to be successful or at least effective enough there are still a couple of possible nonexclusive avenues that hold the potential to bring about an outcome different than what Tornado Cash is facing.

First, business entities running the coordinators could attempt to prevent illegal funds to be CoinJoined. Wasabi Wallet is seeking such a reality with its zkSNACKs coordinator, according to an announcement from earlier this year. It isnt clear whether Wasabi has implemented this feature yet. (This is a complicated and hardly positive path for the ecosystem as a whole, however, because it enables regulatory overreach on tools that are not money transmitters and which regulators and enforcement agencies themselves realize at present should not be subject to AML rules.)

A second and arguably better option would be leveraging even more decentralized CoinJoin tools such as JoinMarket. Even though it isnt a perfect implementation, as highlighted by Shinobi in this article, JoinMarket presents a great option for Bitcoin users to embark on CoinJoins in a catastrophic scenario such as the above. It is even more resilient than centrally-coordinated CoinJoins, meaning it would amplify all the enforcement challenges posed by the likes of Samourai and Wasabi, and spotting JoinMarket CoinJoin transactions on-chain is in and of itself already more challenging and can lead to false positives.

On a different note, OFACs sanction of Tornado Cash has also created additional problems in a cascading effect that are worth considering when it comes to potential sanctions on Bitcoin. One of the contributors to the Tornado Cash open-source code was arrested following the sanction; Tornado Cashs GitHub account and of some of its developers were shut down; and the website for Tornado Cash was taken down.

It isnt yet clear why the developer was arrested, but Bitcoin Magazine contacted GitHub to learn more about the accounts shutdown.

Trade laws require GitHub to restrict users and customers identified as Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) or other denied or blocked parties, or that may be using GitHub on behalf of blocked parties, a GitHub spokesperson told Bitcoin Magazine. At the same time, GitHubs vision is to be the global platform for developer collaboration. We examine government sanctions thoroughly to be certain that users and customers are not impacted beyond what is required by law.

Bitcoin Magazine inquired further but received the same response as above.

Therefore it is clear that Bitcoin, and any open-source project for that matter, may suffer from the same GitHub accounts shutdown in the event of an OFAC sanction. However, as highlighted by the community in forums and Twitter, some options also exist to mitigate this threat such as self-hosted GitLab instances.

Still, another difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum also plays a role here. While in the ecosystem of the latter centralized tools play a bigger role in its decentralized offerings for example Infura, which powers most of the Ethereum apps, wallets and services and is susceptible to sanctions and censorship the former is better positioned to sustain similar threats.

In sum, Bitcoin is arguably the most well-prepared network to withstand nation-state attacks given the intricacies of its design, some of which were explored in-depth in this article. Moreover, challenges to the enforcement of possible sanctions on Bitcoin privacy tools make such an action not only unlikely but seemingly futile to be undertaken as its efficacy might simply not be amplified compared to what is done today regarding money laundering with Bitcoin and CoinJoins. Finally, the unlikelihood of such an event is further exacerbated by the unique characteristics of CoinJoins and the structural differences their implementation poses to mixing.

This article mainly focuses on the probable reasoning behind OFACs sanction on Tornado Cash to imagine how such a sanction could be ported onto Bitcoin and its tools. But it wouldnt be fair to leave out a commentary on what has likely been an overextension of regulatory oversight.

As highlighted by several industry players and businesses, the sanction of open-source code might be an infringement on the Constitutional First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech, and, as mentioned previously, code has been established as speech under U.S. law. Moreover, any attack on open-source code is an attack on Bitcoin.

Additionally, the sanctioning of Tornado Cash altogether has negative implications to law-abiding citizens that leveraged the tool to protect their legitimate privacy interests, as explained by Seth Hertlein, global head of policy at hardware wallet maker Ledger.

All in all, as already mentioned, while regulators shouldnt overextend their statutory authority, litigation can take years. Furthermore, given that legislation is dependent on jurisdiction, what is legal or illegal is geographically subjective. Consequently, decentralized systems should be designed from the ground up to withstand capture or overreach with unstoppable, uncensorable networks.

Read more:
Now That Authorities Have Shut Down Tornado Cash, Is Bitcoin Next? - Bitcoin Magazine

Read More..