Page 1,543«..1020..1,5421,5431,5441,545..1,5501,560..»

The Time ‘Pharma Bro’ Shkreli Said A Former Criminal Cartel … – Investing.com UK

Benzinga - In a Substack post, penned in December 2022, pharma bro Martin Shkreli made an extraordinary claim that Paul Le Roux, a former programmer and criminal cartel leader, was Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC).

What Happened: Shkreli said he managed to decrypt the first transfer ever sent to the late Bitcoin pioneer, Hal Finney. He wrote in the post that the transaction was made by Paul Leroux to Hal Finney on January 12, 2009.

See More: Best Crypto Day Trading Strategies

Shkreli is a controversial pharmaceutical entrepreneur and former hedge fund manager. He gained notoriety in 2015 after dramatically increasing the price of the life-saving drug Daraprim. In 2017, he was convicted of federal securities fraud. He was released in May 2022, after serving a seven-year prison sentence.

Paul Le Roux is a former computer programmer and alleged crime kingpin. He has been charged in the U.S. with drug trafficking, money laundering, and murder-for-hire-related crimes. In 2012, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) successfully arrested Roux.

Greg Maxwell, a prominent developer, has challenged Shkrelis claims by pointing out that the type of digital signature attributed to Satoshi did not emerge until after Finney had died. This suggests that someone else may now have control of the late software developer's private key.

This story was originally published on Dec. 14, 2022

Read Next: Dogecoin Co-Creator Lashes Out At Elizabeth Warren For 'Anti-Crypto Army' Plans

2023 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Join the millions of people who stay on top of global financial markets with Investing.com.

Download Now

Read more:

The Time 'Pharma Bro' Shkreli Said A Former Criminal Cartel ... - Investing.com UK

Read More..

Bitcoin (BTC) price prediction 2023, Polygon (MATIC), and RenQ … – Analytics Insight

Bitcoin (BTC), the worlds first and most popular cryptocurrency, has been in the spotlight for over a decade since its launch in 2009. With a market capitalization of over $549.57B, BTC remains the top crypto choice for investors globally.

However, with the markets volatility, many investors are keen to know what the future holds for the king of cryptocurrencies. This article will analyze the price predictions for Bitcoin in 2023 and examine the potential of two emerging cryptocurrencies, Polygon (MATIC) and RenQ Finance (RENQ), in the DeFi space.

Bitcoin, created by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto in a 2008 whitepaper, is a decentralized cryptocurrency. It was launched in January 2009 as a peer-to-peer online currency that facilitates direct transactions between network participants without the need for intermediaries. The core philosophy behind Bitcoin is to enable online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the involvement of a financial institution.

Although the concept of a decentralized electronic currency existed before Bitcoins creation, it was the first cryptocurrency to see practical use. Bitcoins underlying technology, blockchain, has since spawned numerous other cryptocurrencies and has been adopted by various industries outside of finance. Today, Bitcoin remains the most well-known and valuable cryptocurrency, with a market capitalization that far exceeds that of any other digital asset.

BTCs price has been volatile since its inception, with numerous highs and lows.

Coinpedias projections suggest that Bitcoin will reach a price of $43,959 by the end of 2023. Other analysts have made comparable forecasts, with some going as far as predicting a new all-time high of $100,000 if Bitcoin can surpass its previous high of $69,000.

This prediction is based on various factors, including institutional investments, the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies, and Bitcoins limited supply.

Polygon (MATIC) and RenQ Finance (RENQ) are two DeFi tokens that have shown significant potential in the crypto market.

Polygon, previously known as Matic Network, is a platform designed for infrastructure development and scaling on Ethereum. Its key offering is the Polygon SDK, a versatile and modular framework that allows for the creation of a wide range of applications.

This project effectively transforms Ethereum into a full-fledged multi-chain system, similar to other projects such as Polkadot, Cosmos, and Avalanche, while leveraging the advantages of Ethereums security, openness, and dynamic ecosystem.

Polygon offers a variety of chain types, including optimistic rollup chains, ZK rollup chains, standalone chains, and more. The $MATIC token is also an integral part of the platform, serving to secure the system and facilitate governance.

As of writing, Polygon (MATIC) is $1.11. Experts predict that MATICs price could reach the range between $1.02 to $1.53 and the average price of MATIC should be around $1.28.

RenQ Finance (RENQ) is a promising DeFi platform that aims to provide liquidity and interoperability solutions to the crypto market. The projects unique approach to DeFi and cross-chain compatibility has gained attention from investors.

RENQ has already proven to be successful, with its recent presale raising over $4.5 million as of writing. The platform has also shown impressive growth, with its price increasing from $0.02 to $0.035 in just a few months. Experts predict that RENQs price could reach up to $2 by the end of 2023, given its partnerships with top blockchain projects and the growing demand for DeFi solutions.

RenQ Finances multi-chain approach allows for increased interoperability, while its use of a Layer 2 scaling solution ensures low transaction costs and fast processing times. These features make RENQ an attractive option for investors looking to make the most of their crypto investments in the growing DeFi market.

Click Here to Buy RenQ Finance (RENQ) Tokens.

Website:https://renq.ioWhitepaper:https://renq.io/whitepaper.pdf

Read more:

Bitcoin (BTC) price prediction 2023, Polygon (MATIC), and RenQ ... - Analytics Insight

Read More..

Uncovering Nakamigos: The Origins, Rumors, and What We Know … – nft now

The Nakamigos NFT project is raising eyebrows in the Web3 community. After coming onto the scene with a March 23 public mint, the collection took only four days to surpass NFT giant Bored Ape Yacht Club in lifetime trades and has done 7,562 ETH (nearly $13 million) in trading volume on the secondary market at the time of writing.

The collections success arguably rests on two things, neither of which fail to spark interest in Web3 spheres: the proven track record of its founder and the wildly-speculative intrigue of the projects origin and associations. Here, we take a look at what the Nakamigos project is, whos behind it, and weigh the rumors that seemingly connect it to one of the most prominent players in all of Web3.

Nakamigos is a 20K PFP project from HiFo Labs, a little-known company that claims its team has been producing NFT and digital projects for the past five years. The NFTs in the collection are 2424 pixel characters in a style reminiscent of CryptoPunks. The collection derives its name from the pseudonymous founder of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto (Nakamigos being the friends of Nakamoto).

According to a blog post from the project, the artist behind Nakamigos is an OG crypto artist who may or may not choose to reveal their identity at some point in the future. Some have speculated that this artist is none other than Sartoshi, the NFT influencer and crypto artist behind 2021s popular mfers collection.

The reason for such speculation comes from the fact that Nakamigos emergence is tied intimately with Sartoshis history in the space.

Before creating mfers, Sartoshi had accumulated a significant following on Web3 Twitter, which helped solidify the projects success when it launched in November 2021. But in June 2022, Sartoshi decided to leave mfers, claiming that he intended to hand over project leadership and funds to the community in a display of commitment to the Web3 ethos of decentralization.

The move was controversial; many labeled his abdication a rug-pull scam, while others noted that the decision was something that several in the community had long been calling for.

To mark his departure from the project, Sartoshi minted the end of sartoshi eos pass collection, which served as a sentimental farewell to his community. Six months later, however, Sartoshi returned, and many in Web3 wondered how he would pick up the pieces of a controversial exit and carry on with his community.

In a February 16 tweet, Sartoshi seemingly delivered. He informed his following that Nakamigos was going to be a 20K PFP project, and that holders of the eos pass would be granted a free mint from the collection a day before it became available to the public on March 23. However, Sartoshis exact role in relation to the project has yet to be officially clarified.

Since Nakamigos release, rumors have been swirling on Web3 Twitter about HiFo Labs potential connection to Larva Labs, the company initially behind CryptoPunks (CryptoPunks sold to Yuga Labs in 2022).

Proponents of this theory point to the collections aesthetic similarities and the fact that Nakamigos licensing agreement is explicitly modeled after the one that Yuga Labs made for the collection after they acquired the IP from Larva in early 2022. There is currently no evidence to support these claims, however.

Regardless, Nakamigos clearly felt it needed to address the rumors, posting Not Larva. Not Yuga. Nakamigos. to Twitter on March 27.

What is clear about the collection is that the Nakamigos team grants holders commercial rights to their NFTs, allowing them to monetize them as they see fit. The licensing agreement states that holders can even trademark their NFT so long as it is actually being used in commerce and not just on an intent-to-use basis.

While not quite a Creative Commons (CC0) license, this kind of IP usage permission is quite powerful. Allowing commercialization rights has enabled holders of blue-chip NFTs like Bored Ape Yacht Club to capitalize on their digital tokens in significant ways, starting up everything from restaurants to wine companies as a result.

All 20,000 Nakamigos NFTs have minted out. eos pass holders received early access to the collection on March 22, and the public mint went live on March 23 in a Dutch auction that started at 1 ETH and went down to 0.01

ETH. However, interested buyers can find them on the secondary market, with the collections floor currently sitting at 0.18 ETH. Some of the rarer NFTs in the collection are trading hands for far more than that, however. Nakamigos #7762, which sports a hoodie and an orange helmet, recently sold for 1.690 ETH, and ghost Nakamigos #3648 sold for a healthy 16 ETH on March 28.

The Nakamigos team has been promoting the project in a classic Web3 way, having gifted 24 honorary Nakamigos NFTs to well-known figures and influencers in the NFT community. Recipients include Richerd Chan of Manifold, Art Blocks CEO Erick Calderon, Seedphrase, collector and thought-leader Cozomo de Medici, and more.

The future of Nakamigos is as shrouded as HiFo Labs itself is. With no Discord and no other social media channel other than its official Twitter handle, Nakamigos has thus far communicated relatively little to its community and therefore remains an esoteric project. But for those looking to nab a cool-looking NFT from a collection that seems like its aiming to be a kind of spiritual successor to CryptoPunks, Nakamigos could be a great buy.

The teams underscoring of commercialization rights for holders is another interesting aspect of the project, one that could indicate a larger, yet-to-be-revealed IP play from HiFo Labs.

A number of Web3 projects have made increasingly frequent efforts to monetize their IP in the last year, with some finding success in doing so. But that can only happen if the Nakamigos community decides it wants to take advantage of those capabilities, something that will be hard for HiFo Labs to incentivize without first fostering greater trust amongst its holder base. For that, the company is going to have to step out of the shadows a bit. Expect it do to so in the not-too-distant future.

Link:

Uncovering Nakamigos: The Origins, Rumors, and What We Know ... - nft now

Read More..

Newly Formed ZeroSync Association Brings Zero-Knowledge Proofs to Bitcoin – Yahoo Finance

Join the most important conversation in crypto and web3! Secure your seat today

Three German computer scientists have created a Swiss nonprofit called the ZeroSync Association to help scale Bitcoin by using zero-knowledge proofs (zk-proofs), a cryptographic technique that has exploded in popularity on rival chain Ethereum.

Zero-knowledge proofs use cryptography to prove the validity of information without revealing the information itself. Using a zk-proof to validate the Bitcoin blockchain means nodes can sync almost instantly instead of taking hours (and sometimes days) to download the chains current 500 GB of data.

ZeroSync has already produced a working prototype that allows users to validate the state (who owns what right now) and transaction history of the Bitcoin blockchain without downloading the entire chain or trusting a third party.

The prototype can verify Bitcoin consensus rules but not transaction signatures. Its also a bit clunky and still needs to be optimized for speed and security, so its not ready for prime time just yet, but the important thing is it works.

It's very much in the prototype stage, ZeroSync co-founder Robin Linus told CoinDesk. But the grand vision is that you download that one megabyte of proof and that is as good as if you had downloaded the 500 gigabytes.

Light clients or simple payment verification (SPV) nodes have always existed on the Bitcoin blockchain. In fact, Satoshi Nakamoto mentioned the concept in the Bitcoin white paper. They are critical for small devices like mobile phones that cant download the entire blockchain.

It is possible to verify payments without running a full network node, Satoshi wrote. "Verification is reliable as long as honest nodes control the network, but is more vulnerable if the network is overpowered by an attacker.

ZeroSync goes a step further by verifying transactions via cryptographic proof rather than merely trusting honest nodes as suggested by Satoshi.

Story continues

You don't have to trust. That is the entire point, said Linus. The proof proves it to you. That's the great invention.

A fully functioning zk-proof mechanism can be used to enable a wide range of applications outside of the flagship node syncing use case. ZeroSync has created a developer tool kit to enable applications like proof-of-reserves on exchanges and transaction history compression on second layer protocols like Lightning Labs Taro.

Linus and fellow co-founder Lukas George joined forces in July to work on implementing a full chain proof of the Bitcoin blockchain after Georges undergraduate thesis on implementing a proof of Bitcoin's headers caught the attention of Geometry Research.

The team subsequently added Tino Steffens to the mix; all three co-founders have a background in computer science.

Linus was living in Santa Teresa, a remote beach town on Costa Rica's Nicoya Peninsula that has one ATM machine with a 10 p.m. curfew. It drove Linus nuts and forced him to research alternative payment methods. He stumbled upon Bitcoin, befriended the well-respected Bitcoin sorcerer Ruben Somsen (who coined the term ZeroSync), and the rest, as they say, is history.

From there, I started to learn more and more about cryptography, Linus said. I developed some skills over time and then Ruben recommended me to Geometry Research. They offered me the opportunity to build STARK proofs for Bitcoin and that's also how I got in touch with Lucas.

See the rest here:

Newly Formed ZeroSync Association Brings Zero-Knowledge Proofs to Bitcoin - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

What You Can And Can’t Trust In Crypto – BeInCrypto

Over the past year, some of the crypto worlds biggest companies have collapsed, from Celsius and Voyager to BlockFi and FTX. The one constant in all these failures has been the massive breach of trust for everyone involved from retail investors to crypto institutions. I think its important to reflect on how and why this happened.

Lets think back to the innovation that launched the entire crypto industry the Bitcoin white paper. The very first sentence of that paper explains that the central problem of online commerce is trust. Internet payment infrastructure still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust-based model, the pseudonymous author Satoshi Nakamoto wrote, What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust.

But recent events provide a stark reminder that when dealing with crypto assets in practice, investors still need to think carefully about who and what they trust. I believe there are three important categories of trust in crypto you can trust the code, you can trust the law, or you can trust the person. Id like to explain each of these, and offer some advice on how to think about protecting your digital assets.

The Bitcoin white paper invites us to trust the code, and because of this, Bitcoin and similar crypto assets are often referred to as a trustless system. In certain limited scenarios, it is possible to rely on this trustlessness. This has given rise to the maxim: not your keys, not your coins, suggesting that only those who self-custody their own crypto have true ownership of their assets.

Its true that more centralized methods of holding assets involve some level of trusting an institution, just like you trust your local bank to keep your paycheck and retirement accounts safe. Of course, that doesnt mean that self-custody choosing to exclusively trust the code is the right option for everyone. For one thing, not everyone has the technical savvy to do this successfully and safely. Even those who do will often still find themselves using centralized institutions to trade and access advanced products, so some level of dependence on trust is hard to get away from.

There are a host of DeFi protocols that offer a service that is more code-governed than a traditional centralized financial institution run by people. Trusting these protocols, however, requires that you personally verify that the code does what it says it does, or alternatively, trust the people who programmed it. We have seen throughout the course of 2022 that some of these decentralized protocols come with their own significant risks to investors.

We need to remember that a lot of the time, when we are told to trust the code, were really placing our trust in people. Just look at FTX. In public, FTX touted its automated liquidation engine as the ultimate risk management tool. In reality, FTX management appears to have secretly exempted Alameda Research, a huge trading firm personally owned by its founder, from that protocol. Alameda failed, and now the exchange itself is insolvent.

At the end of the day, if you are asked to trust the code to protect your assets, you either need to be very certain that you understand the code yourself, or you need to think about whether you trust the people behind the code.

In everyday life, we largely trust the law to protect our interests when we rely on banks and other financial institutions to make transactions and save our hard-earned wealth.

Fraud and financial crimes do happen, of course, but legal protections limit the impact on individual customers. In the United States, for example, even if a consumer bank were to become completely insolvent, the US government insures account holders to the tune of $250,000. In addition, there are well-developed laws and regulations as well as stiff civil and criminal penalties for financial misconduct in most parts of the world, which go a long way toward deterring bad actors.

Thanks to these legal protections, people generally have very good reason to trust retail bank deposits, at least in the developed world. In these places, self-custodying ones fiat savings would entail a much bigger risk.

So another important question for crypto users to answer is: to what extent are they protected by law? In this regard, they need to think about not just their own home country, but also about which jurisdiction the institution they may be trading with is based in.

Users can more likely have some trust in the law when they are dealing with an institution thats physically based in the country where they live, not offshore. It is also very important to consider whether that institution is licensed by local regulatory authorities who provide oversight.

In the case of Coins, we are regulated by the Philippines central bank, and hold a variety of licenses which are also held by local financial institutions. Were audited regularly, and we comply with the rules. Thats what happens in places where there is real regulatory oversight you follow the rules or you go to jail. Its pretty simple.

Of course, there are still criminals in this world who choose to break the law, in finance and in every other area of life. As with trust the code, when you are relying on the law to protect your investment, there is always some degree of trust in institutions and people. It will be important to watch how legal authorities respond to the recent breaches of trust in the crypto space.

Ive established that in crypto, as in any other financial endeavor, there is almost always going to be some level of needing to trust your counterparty. We are not yet living in the totally trustless world envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto.

What crypto users must not do is place their trust entirely in a group of people, or even worse, a single powerful individual. If a counterparty is a centralized institution that takes custody of your assets, and does so offshore, potentially beyond the reach of regulators and law enforcement, then they are essentially asking you to trust a person. If you wouldnt agree to that with your fiat savings, you should think twice about doing it with your crypto assets.

If any good comes out of the recent negative events in the crypto markets, hopefully consumers think more carefully about the risks they are exposed to. And as crypto companies continue to build through the current bear market, lets hope that both capital and customer interest flow to platforms and products that offer consumers some level of code-based or law-based protection beyond simply telling them: trust me.

By Elijah Tan, VP of Exchange, Coins.ph and ex-Binance Fiat Lead

In compliance with the Trust Project guidelines, this opinion article presents the authors perspective and may not necessarily reflect the views of BeInCrypto. BeInCrypto remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are advised to verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content.

Link:

What You Can And Can't Trust In Crypto - BeInCrypto

Read More..

Cryptos Unfulfilled Dreams Get a Tailwind From U.S. Crackdown on Binance, Coinbase – Yahoo Finance

Join the most important conversation in crypto and web3! Secure your seat today

A founding principle of this whole cryptocurrency experiment is to extol the benefits of decentralizing the financial system.

Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled network, Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoins creator, wrote in 2008. But pure P2P [peer-to-peer] networks seem to be holding their own.

And, yet, crypto got real centralized. Binance, Coinbase and before it blew up FTX grew to be giants of trading, creating a vulnerability if those companies ran into trouble. And they did. Binance and Coinbase face a U.S. regulatory crackdown. FTX famously crumbled last year amid fraud allegations.

There is another way, though, a path mostly known only to traders deeply embedded in the world of crypto: decentralized exchanges (DEX) such as dYdX or Uniswap. And while there are obstacles to more widespread adoption they are far less user-friendly than centralized exchanges (CEX) like Binance, whose websites and apps closely resemble the brokerage software seen in traditional finance (TradFi) the investigations into Binance and Coinbase could create a tailwind for these geekier, decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions.

Read more: What Is a DEX? How Decentralized Crypto Exchanges Work

My best guess is this will further increase DeFi market share as protocols are harder to stop, said Dave Weisberger, the CEO and co-founder of CoinRoutes. While its not impossible to go after DeFi protocols the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission just subpoenaed the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) behind SushiSwap, another DEX protocols are harder to prosecute, he added.

Howard Greenberg, president and co-founder of the American Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Association, also sees DeFi getting a tailwind, arguing the Commodity Futures Trading Commissions case announced this week against Binance which was accused of breaking the law by allowing U.S. traders to access its offshore exchange may push traders to decentralized alternatives.

Story continues

Shortly after the news of the U.S. regulator lawsuit against Binance, users withdrew $400 million on the Ethereum blockchain, according to blockchain analytics firm Nansen. This is compared to a net outflow of $2 billion over the past seven days.

Up until recently, centralized crypto exchanges have been the primary choice for traders looking to buy and sell bitcoin (BTC) and the like. For retail traders, thats because CEXs can be less intimidating than the apps that serve DeFi. For pros and institutional investors, theres historically been more liquidity on CEXs, an appealing quality.

Binance, the largest crypto exchange in the world, has a daily trading volume of about $9.3 billion. In comparison, dYdX, the largest DEX, trades around $770 million worth of crypto in a day.

DEXs are intrinsically more transparent than CEXs, given that the former completes trades publicly on a blockchain. CEXs conventionally do not, in part because blockchains simply cannot process transactions fast enough. But blockchains are getting faster. Ironically, DEXs could make regulators job easier.

Read more: Arbitrum Surges Ahead as Ethereums Layer 2 Landscape Takes Shape

CEXs being complete black boxes, which almost always creates the uneasy perception of misaligned interests, makes the job of a regulator significantly harder, said Berk Ozdogan, head of strategy at Dexalot.

From a regulator's perspective, trading occurring on public blockchain DEXs means that the effort to prepare formal inquiries, the time needed to conclude the discussions and the trust that needs to be placed on the investigated CEX would no longer be needed since the activity would be readily available for review, he added.

On DEXs, traders can buy or sell cryptocurrencies without an intermediary, which is typically the part that creates uncertainty because of the limited insight the public gets.

One of the complaints that regulators and even clients of large centralized exchanges have repeatedly expressed is the need for some type of financial audit, a document that proves the company is holding exactly the amount of assets it says it holds. The closest to an audit that most exchanges, such as Binance, have released so far is a proof-of-reserves document, but it cant nearly be trusted as much.

Audits would be one step closer to the transparency requirements lawmakers are longing for but still far from the level of transparency that DEXs where every move can be traced on the public blockchain provide naturally.

If we learned anything from 2022, particularly with FTX, its the fact that custodial relationships, especially in the face of lack of regulation, are very bad, said Ozdogan. Too many users have lost assets to bad actors and, in turn, the custodial nature of centralized exchanges. In the world of digital assets, one rule reigns supreme: Not your keys, not your crypto.

Here is the original post:

Cryptos Unfulfilled Dreams Get a Tailwind From U.S. Crackdown on Binance, Coinbase - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

The Bitcoin Masterclasses in Slovenia: What are Distributed Hash … – CoinGeek

In the first session of the second day of The Bitcoin Masterclasses in Slovenia, Dr. Craig Wright talked about Distributed Hash Tables, how they can help create robust, truly decentralized networks, and how the type of networks weve been talking about can wrest back control from the Silicon Valley giants and return it to the individual.

Distributed Hash Tables

Dr. Wright begins the morning session with the concept ofDistributed Hash Tables(DHTs). They serve as a method for distributing information across many servers and are usually linked to corporations and individuals running different services.

Dr. Wright then asks the attendees if any of them have worked on DHTs. One attendee answers that he has worked on Hadoop. He elaborates that this is a standard key-value style database spread acrossmultiple nodes. You push information to it, and its distributed based on the hash. Dr. Wright picks up on this point to emphasize thatdecentralized doesnt mean what people think it does; in a sense, he uses the word, DHTs are decentralized in that they are stored on multiple nodes.

Robust, decentralized networks

Then comes a hypothetical question; what happens if youre in one of the multicast groups discussed earlier and want to get all of the information pushed to you, but you arent online 24/7?

Straightforwardly, you wont get it. You can ask another group member to update you or set up machines to stay online. Dr. Wright likens this to setting up FNet or IRC programs to continue receiving information when youre offline.

He emphasizes that this is what a robust, decentralized network means; if you have one node and it goes offline, thats not good, but if you have two or more, the chances of losing information become much lower. More nodes are better, but there are diminishing returns after the first few.

Imagining an alternative to Twitter, Dr. Wright rightly says we dont want to have to call on our group to give us all of the information we missed while we were gone. Rather than do this, we have our listener responding and saying were away but requesting the information be sent to it anyway. We then connect to this machine with our phone when were online and pull the information.

Such bots would be very cheap and inexpensive to run. Theyll be run onmicropayments. Furthermore, they can be encrypted so that the information in them is accessible only with your key.

Now were getting to the point where we have a better, more robust version of Twitter, Dr. Wright says.

How many servers are we using on Amazon? How many on Google or Bing? Dr. Wright asks. The answer, of course, is none, and thats why none of them will talk about this sort of thing. They dont want users doing any of this because they want to have control over all data. He points out that Twitter or Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL) could join open groups and suck all the information anyway, but its much more difficult when there are so many potential groups.

Do you see how this becomes a different model? Dr. Wright asks rhetorically, smiling as he describes how Silicon Valley firms like Meta and Twitter wont be able to collect data and snoop on us. This is what he meant by decentralization when he spoke asSatoshi Nakamoto.

Accessing distributed data, fostering competition, and restoring privacy

With distributed systems like the ones Dr. Wright outlines, there are solutions to many of the problems big Silicon Valley companies created today. He says that having standards fordata access and accessing them in multiple ways can improve things.

For example, people can make competing apps that can access the data stored on the blockchain, allowing users to migrate from one to another while still having access to the data provided they have the keys to unlock it (like using a seed phrase to switch between wallets).

This competition between app developers will foster innovation, something Silicon Valley hasnt seen for a long time because a few monopolies literally own the networks they operate on. With DHTs, we have a new way of distributing and holding information in a truly decentralized way.

Dr. Wright then delves into how two parties can usepeer-to-peer networkssuch as the one he describes to communicate securely and even pseudonymously. Once again, this cuts out the data harvesters who want access to our communications for various agendas. Privacy means giving back to the individual, Dr. Wright says, hammering his point home.

Circling back to his earlier talks in theLondon Masterclass, Dr. Wright outlines how we can share certain information with interested parties without handing over unnecessary information. This, too, will restore a level of privacy the world has not seen in a long time.

Watch: The Bitcoin Masterclasses Identity & Privacy

New to Bitcoin? Check out CoinGeeksBitcoin for Beginnerssection, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about Bitcoinas originally envisioned by Satoshi Nakamotoand blockchain.

Read more from the original source:

The Bitcoin Masterclasses in Slovenia: What are Distributed Hash ... - CoinGeek

Read More..

Bitcoin: The Digital Gold Rush of the 21st Century – Geeky Gadgets

Bitcoin has played a cardinal role in revolutionizing the global currency from traditional to digital. Notably, Bitcoins popularity skyrocketed shortly after its launch. However, despite the rise in its popularity, Bitcoin remains to be discovered by a significant global population. And this confirms that currency evolution is still underway, whereby some countries and individuals struggle to accommodate Bitcoin as a digital currency and a mode of payment.

Being the most searched term in the past three years, Bitcoin has emerged as a point of interest, which could be the pioneering element in the digital currency era. It is also notable that the rising competition from other cryptocurrencies projects the inevitable digital currency era. Therefore, many people regard Bitcoin as digital gold, whose dominance in the 21st century has already been apparent.

Various platforms, includingBitcoin Freedom, amply cover Bitcoin growth proof and market performance trends. From such projections, Bitcoin investors can analyze the overall performance and how Bitcoin has outweighed the traditional currencies within 13 years. All indications justify that Bitcoin is here to stay and will continue retaining its dominant position in the crypto markets.

Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin in 2009 in line with the previously developed white paper in 2008. The focus was mainly on providing payment convenience, whereby people would use digital mechanisms. In other words, Bitcoin became the first cryptocurrency to facilitate virtual and online transactions. Concerns about the many inconveniences of traditional currencies ensued for a long time. The need to change the conventional transaction trends was inevitable. And this inspired Satoshi to develop a digital currency- Bitcoin.

Initially, individuals hesitated to adopt or use Bitcoin in transactions. Considering its virtual nature, there was hesitation to appreciate Bitcoin; hence, most people stuck to traditional currencies. However, Bitcoin gained traction after two years in the market, prompting significant price and value increases. With the growing popularity, more individuals indicated an interest in adopting the currency as a mode of payment.

Decentralization was the most significant development that emerged when Bitcoin launched. Bitcoin developers are the pioneers of decentralization globally. Satoshi conceived the idea based on eliminating intermediaries in transaction trials. In essence, decentralization provides an environment where regulators, central banks, and other financial institutions do not feature. Therefore, the formation basis is purely peer-to-peer transactions.

The decentralization mechanism ushered various benefits, some of which individuals identify and appreciate to date. For instance, decentralization allows individuals to initiate transactions and complete processes without any paperwork or regulation provisions. The said merit overshadowed the traditional banking trends, particularly in eliminating the cumbersome paperwork and unrealistic requirements. The more significant part of Bitcoins popularity rests on the decentralization mechanism.

Bitcoin is on record as the best-performing in terms of value and price. Bitcoin launched in 2009, and in just eight years, the coins value had already surpassed the $10 million mark. Notably, Bitcoin was below $1 one year after it launched, only to grow thousands of times within eight years. Although Bitcoins current performance is lower than the previous years, there are predictions that the coin will grow and hit an all-time high in a few years ahead. Economic performance is the cardinal factor influencing Bitcoins market performance. With the predicted financial stability, Bitcoins price will likely skyrocket and regain its previous glory.

Bitcoin is fast catching up with traditional currencies. Experts predict Bitcoin will likely spearhead the evolution and transition to the digital currency era. The bottom line is that Bitcoins influence in the global economy is prevalent, hence a central point of focus among individuals and financial institutions.

See the original post:

Bitcoin: The Digital Gold Rush of the 21st Century - Geeky Gadgets

Read More..

De Dollarisation – Crypto was created for this – Crypto Daily

Mike Novogratz of Galaxy Digital has commented that crypto was created by Satoshi Nakamoto precisely for the kind of over-printing and debasement of currency that the world is experiencing right now.

De-dollarisation is happening. The over-financialisation that has taken place in the West over the last few decades is coming home to roost. The BRICS nations are already trading in the Chinese Yuan, and applications to sign up to this bloc are multiplying rapidly.

United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Algeria, Argentina, Mexico and Nigeria are reportedly looking to join this new global cooperation group, with Saudi Arabia already on the brink of being accepted, putting in jeopardy the long-standing agreement with the U.S. to exchange oil for dollars.

Mike Novogratz, the billionaire entrepreneur and CEO of Galaxy Digital, made his comments during his companys Q4 2022 earnings call. He said that crypto prices are likely to go up over the coming months at the same time that de-dollarisation is just getting started. He stated:

Lets start with the good This is cryptos moment. Crypto was, in lots of ways, created for this point, right? Satoshi Yakamoto way back in 2009 worried about the breakdown of the legacy financial system. He worried about populism infecting our politics and a constant printing of fiat currencies and a debasement of money, and created Bitcoin.

Novogratz continues with his view on how the politics of the Biden administration, together with the banks, are trying to besmirch crypto. He noted that whatever Biden or Jamie Dimon say, theyre just wrong, and the world knows that.

The billionaire CEO says that macro hedge funds are paying close attention to the developments with banks and the situation with Russia, Ukraine, and the roles that the U.S. and China are playing.

He believes that the financial and geo-political environment is one in which sound money such as gold and bitcoin will thrive. He commented:

This war between China and the U.S. with Russia as a proxy is going to push the gold narrative, and the digital version of that is Bitcoin, and so I think from a macro investor perspective, its very clear.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go here to see the original:

De Dollarisation - Crypto was created for this - Crypto Daily

Read More..

Who is the mysterious Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto? – Cointelegraph

Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?

The first Bitcoin (BTC) was mined on January 3, 2009, by someone known as Satoshi Nakamoto. Now, Satoshi Nakamoto is recognized as the pseudonym of the person or group of people who created Bitcoin the invisible figure or figures whose technological creation has influenced the world.

Satoshi Nakamoto was already a familiar name among cryptography enthusiasts like computer scientists and hackers long before the Bitcoin boom. Someone had posted on online message boards and corresponded with fellow developers via email under the same name years prior. Although unconfirmed, it is widely suspected that the person (or persons) behind the pseudonym was also behind those communications.

Months before mining the first Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto had published a white paper on a cryptography mailing list entitled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. The paper, published on October 31, 2008, outlined a decentralized peer-to-peer protocol that was cryptographically secure.

In the white paper, Nakamoto described it as a purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash that would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution or any intermediary.

This article will explore what is known about the founder of Bitcoin, those who have claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, whether Nick Szabo is Satoshi Nakamoto and the mysteries and truth behind the creator of Bitcoin.

Although Nakamoto remains a mysterious figure, his goal for creating cryptocurrency, in itself, was never a mystery. Simply put, he created it to take financial control back from financial elites, giving ordinary people a chance to take part in a decentralized financial system.

Bitcoin remains open-source, meaning that no one has the power to own or control it in its entirety. Its design is public and it is open for anyone to participate.

Bitcoin was a response to the Great Financial Crisis, which showed that even the worlds biggest banks can fail. It highlighted the fragility of the modern financial system and called for the decentralization of financial transactions. As such, cryptocurrency was born, and Bitcoin was one of the first options outside the traditional financial system for the public to participate in intermediate-free financial transactions.

The blockchain is how cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin develop trust among users and ensure security, as it is a network-based ledger that all participants can access. The genesis block of Bitcoin was mined on January 3, 2009, by Satoshi Nakamoto, officially launching the blockchain. A genesis block is the first block of a cryptocurrency to be mined and acts as the foundation of the blockchain.

For the first few months of its existence, Bitcoin had no monetary equivalent worth. Miners, people who used their computers to solve complex math problems to discover or mine new Bitcoin, were doing so only for the novelty.

Miners also helped to verify the validity and accuracy of Bitcoin transactions. The actual Bitcoin payout received by miners is essentially a reward for auditing and processing the highly-encrypted data that is part of each transaction. This ensures that each Bitcoin is properly accounted for and cannot be spent more than once.

The first real-world transaction happened on May 22, 2010, when a man from Florida agreed to exchange two $25 pizzas for 10,000 Bitcoin, thereby making May 22 Bitcoin Pizza Day. It marked the first economic transaction for cryptocurrency. Back then, Bitcoin was valued at four Bitcoin per penny. Since then, its value has multiplied exponentially.

Bitcoin was born after the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008, where liquidity in global financial markets was significantly affected by the housing market collapse. The crisis inspired the creation of Bitcoin, a fully functional form of digital currency based on a distributed ledger technology (DLT) called the blockchain.

Nakamotos white paper laid the groundwork for future forms of cryptographically secure systems that are designed to be tamper-proof, transparent and censorship-resistant. The systems goal was to allow individuals to reclaim financial power through a decentralized financial system.

The idea of decentralization eliminated the need for middlemen, such as companies, financial systems or governments, to be involved in digital currency exchange. The transactions would be secure and tracked through a blockchain. The difference with blockchain was that it was visible to all participants and securely distributed across an entire network.

Three years after publishing his white paper on Bitcoin and mining the genesis block, Nakamoto bowed out of the cryptocurrency scene.

He sent an email to another Bitcoin developer on April 23, 2011, saying that he had moved on to other things, and that the cryptocurrencys future was in good hands. Since then, there has been no communication from Nakamotos previously known email addresses.

Throughout Bitcoins long history, nothing has been more controversial than the identity of its founder. Numerous speculations have surrounded Nakamotos identity. Some people claimed that Nakamoto was the pseudonym of a group of cryptographers, not just one person. Yet others surmised that he might be British, a member of the Yakuza, a money launderer, or a woman disguised as a man.

Over the years, a few individuals have been suspected of being the man behind the elusive pseudonym:

In 2014, Newsweek journalist Leah Mcgrath Goodman published an article entitled The Face Behind Bitcoin. In one of the highest-profile attempts to reveal Nakamotos identity, Goodman identified Dorian Nakamoto as the elusive Bitcoin creator.

Goodman cited similarities between the two Nakamotos, including mathematical skill, temperament, Japanese descent and political leanings. Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto, then 64 years old, was living in Temple, California when Goodman reached out to him. Dorian had previously worked on computer engineering and classified defense projects, according to Goodman.

However, Dorian Nakamoto later denied any involvement with Bitcoin. He dismissed any published quotes as a mere misinterpretation on the reporters part. Nakamoto claimed that his quote was taken out of context and that he had been talking about engineering rather than Bitcoin at the time of the interview.

Later, Satoshi Nakamoto confirmed on an online Bitcoin forum that they are not Dorian Nakamoto putting an end to the rumors.

The Newsweek article sparked a debate regarding Dorian Nakamotos privacy, which the crypto community felt had been violated when Newsweek published a photo of his Los Angeles home.

As a result, the crypto community raised over 100 Bitcoin on behalf of Dorian Nakamoto to express their gratitude and support concerning his ordeal. Dorian later appeared in a YouTube video in 2014 thanking the community, saying that he was going to keep his Bitcoin account for many, many years. Although the video has since been taken down from the original account, copies of it still exist online.

Whereas Dorian Nakamoto denied being Satoshi Nakamoto, Australian computer scientist Craig Wright claimed that he was the man behind the pseudonym.

Wright claimed the identity in 2016 after Wired Magazine released a profile on him in December 2015. The article was entitled Is Bitcoin's Creator this Unknown Australian Genius? and was based on documents leaked to Wired.

The evidence consisted of a paper on cryptocurrency supposedly published on Wrights blog a few months before the infamous Bitcoin white papers release. Leaked emails and correspondence regarding a P2P distributed ledger also surfaced as well as transcripts of tax officials and lawyers containing statements from Wright regarding his involvement in creating Bitcoin.

But evidence came to light proving the contrary. The blog entries had been backdated, as were the supposed public encryption keys linked to Nakamoto.

A major identifier on the blockchain is the public encryption key one-half of the two-key system that crypto holders need to carry out encrypted transactions. In Wrights case, it appeared that both Nakamotos public keys and the blog entries were backdated making his claims much more suspicious.

Wired later recanted its claim and edited its article under the title, Is Bitcoin's Creator this Unknown Australian Genius? Probably Not. The publication cited the supposedly fraudulent evidence that Wright released to back his claim as the reason behind their conviction.

Following suspicions from the crypto community, Wright eventually backed away from the claim.

Crypto expert Nick Szabo was also one of the medias suspected Satoshis. In 2015, The New York Times published an article entitled Decoding the Enigma of Satoshi Nakamoto and the Birth of Bitcoin.

Comparisons were made between him and the mysterious Nakamoto owing to similarities in writing and preoccupations, as well as Szabos significant contribution to the development of Bitcoin.

Nick Szabo is a computer engineer by profession. He is also a cryptographer and a legal scholar and has published works that were tangentially related to Satoshi Nakamotos intellectual preoccupations at certain times. For example:

Szabo pioneered the concept of Smart Contracts in a 1996 paper entitled Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets. Szabo conceptualized Bit Gold in 2008, which was also a decentralized form of currency and a precursor to Bitcoin. Szabo also previously worked for DigiCash, a digital payment system that used cryptography.

Both Nakamoto and Szabo reference economist Carl Menger in their communications.

In his book, Bitcoin: The Future of Money? author Dominic Frisby was convinced that Satoshi Nakamoto and Nick Szabo were the same person and presented arguments to support his hypothesis. Szabo, however, denied the allegations concerning his supposed secret identity.

Hall Finney was a computer scientist, coder, and cryptography enthusiast even before the Bitcoin boom. He died in 2014 at the age of 58 after battling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS, for five years.

Other than Nakamoto himself, Finney was reportedly the first person to have worked on debugging and improving Bitcoins open-source code. He also received the first Bitcoin transaction in 2009 from Satoshi Nakamoto, himself.

He was also neighbors with Los Angeles-based engineer Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, a fact that Forbes journalist Andy Greenberg found interesting, if not suspicious. Greenberg took writing samples from Hal Finney and Satoshi Nakamoto to a writing analysis consultancy service.

Because of the similarities in their writing style, Greenberg initially surmised that Finney may have been Nakamotos ghostwriter, at the very least. He also floated the idea that Finney might have used Dorian Nakamoto as a front to hide his identity.

However, Finney denied such claims and presented evidence to prove that he was not Satoshi Nakamoto. Upon meeting Greenberg, Finney presented the emails that he and Nakamoto had exchanged over the years, as well as his Bitcoin wallets history.

The writing consultancy likewise concluded that Nakamotos alleged emails to Finney were a match with Nakamotos other published writings, cementing Finneys claim that he was not Nakamoto.

The figure Satoshi Nakamoto matters, whether he is a person or a group not because of his identity (or lack thereof) but because of his contribution to the greatest technological invention of all time. Nakamoto paved the way for cryptocurrency to evolve and develop to respond to the 2008 crisis, creating an alternative currency system.

Of course, despite attempts to secure crypto, compromising cryptocurrencies remain a genuine possibility. However, this risk is something that even more traditional models of finance face regularly.

The difference that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin represent is the concept of decentralization and equality. A distributed public ledger via blockchain effectively records, verifies, and validates Bitcoin transactions while making them secure via cryptography.

Since its inception in 2009, no hacker has managed to infiltrate it. Bitcoin also remains relevant years after it was introduced by Nakamoto. Large corporations and investors are becoming increasingly aware of its value and potential. Likewise, even businesses are beginning to accept Bitcoin as payment. The crypto market has also grown exponentially as more people become interested in mining and trading Bitcoin.

Furthermore, Nakamotos creation represents innovation and disruption. It was (and still is) a powerful reminder that all things must continue to improve to survive. In an industry notorious for its resistance to technology, cryptocurrency delivered a jolt to the financial world and shook things up for the better.

Crypto paved the way for various forms of digital currencies and peer-to-peer payment systems to evolve and be integrated into modern society. Innovations such as digital currencies work for the consumers good by offering them alternative modes of payment and investment.

Financial institutions are likewise responding to the challenge by adopting more customer-focused and innovative approaches to finance.

Despite the medias efforts to investigate and reveal Satoshi Nakamotos identity, he remains a mysterious figure whose real-world persona is unknown.

However, it might be interesting to look at the bits of information that we do know about Nakamoto, either from public records or skillful sleuthing. Lets dive in.

The New Yorker cites Nakamoto as a preternaturally talented computer coder who created Bitcoin with thirty-one thousand lines of code. To the uninitiated, the reason why the platform remains safe, secure and trustworthy is thanks to Nakamotos virtually perfect code. It has no mistakes. This, in part, is why it has not been hacked since its creation.

In a 2011 article entitled The Crypto-Currency: Bitcoin and Its Mysterious Inventor, the New Yorker reported how renowned and highly-experienced internet security researcher Dan Kaminsky tried to break Bitcoins code and failed.

For everyones appreciation, Kaminsky wasnt an average coder. He is famous among hackers because he discovered a major flaw in the internet in 2008. He alerted the Department of Homeland Security and Microsoft and Cisco executives to address the problem immediately. Without his discovery, any skilled coder could have been able to shut down the internet or take over any website.

That being said, Kaminsky was excited to potentially find similar fatal flaws in Bitcoin. He saw it as an easy target, something that might be easily compromised. However, what he encountered was Satoshis near-perfect code, which he later found to be impenetrable.

Nakamotos code and white paper on Bitcoin reveal that the infamous coder is fluent in English, particularly British English. This, in part, is why some people believe that Nakamoto might be British, despite his claims of being Japanese.

He also employs British usage in emails to fellow coders like Finney, as evidenced in some of their email correspondences. Programmer John McAfee claims to know who Satoshi is, on account of a linguistic analysis of Nakamotos white paper.

There are also claims that Nakamoto may not be just one person. Instead, they may be a group of people who worked on perfecting and creating the code behind Bitcoin. Owing to its outstanding code, Bitcoin continues to thrive alongside other cryptocurrencies.

Some people, like Bitcoin developer Laszlo Hanyecz, believe that the level of coding at which Bitcoin was created would have necessitated more than just one person. According to him, it is highly likely that it was created by a team of coders.

For all we know, the whole Satoshi thing could be a smokescreen to hide the identity of a female genius. Satoshi Nakamoto claims to have been born in April of 1975.

In the same way that no one is sure if Satoshi is Japanese, people are theorizing that he could also be a female. Also, many are curious about Satoshi Nakamotos net worth. No doubt, whether Satoshi is a male or female, the person is a billionaire.

In a male-dominated industry like tech, its not far-fetched for a woman to use a male name to gain an equal footing among her peers. Historically, female writers have used male pseudonyms in an attempt to penetrate the literary scene and gain the respect traditionally accorded to male authors.

What if Satoshi employed a similar trick? No one can say for sure, but this idea has been an empowering thought for a lot of women in development. New York Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney popularized the tagline Satoshi is female at an event for women in blockchain.

Since its creation, Bitcoin has had a storied past, and not without scandals. Originally designed to be a decentralized and borderless alternative to fiat currency, Bitcoin has been slowly centralized to some degree. Large banks and financial institutions, for example, have begun opening crypto trading desks and custody services for crypto.

Some would call this a compromise, a departure from Nakamotos original vision of a revolutionary platform that eschewed financial institutions.

However, with the rise of Bitcoin whales who own most Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency is said to have fallen under the control of the elite few yet again. These large investors control Bitcoins price in the markets and have the funds to put up Bitcoin mining farms. Consequently, the more miners, the more difficult the mining is (since the mathematical problems become more complicated).

The good news is that Nakamotos creation doesnt seem to be going anywhere anytime soon. It has paved the way for the creation of over 11,000 different forms of cryptocurrency and continues to grow in value.

Should the right technological advancements be in place, it is a genuine possibility that people are going to embrace Bitcoin in more everyday transactions. Many organizations believe that Bitcoin may soon become the currency of choice in the global trading scene.

However, Bitcoins blockchain also needs to evolve and be able to handle more transactions in a short time. Until then, we shall wait and see.

Original post:

Who is the mysterious Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto? - Cointelegraph

Read More..