Page 143«..1020..142143144145..150160..»

Faculty Position in Computer Science job with KIMEP University | 37661552 – The Chronicle of Higher Education

KIMEP University

Computer Science Faculty Position Advertisement

KIMEP University invites applications for faculty positions (Assistant/Associate/Full Professor) in Computer Science. The position will be housed in the Department of Computer Science in the School of Computer Science and Mathematics. KIMEP University is Kazakhstan and Central Asia's most prestigious and dynamic university, serving approximately 3000 students in a variety of undergraduate and graduate degree programs. The Department of Computer Science houses the Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and the Bachelor of Information Systems degree programs.

Qualifications

Applicants must have earned a PhD in computer science or a related discipline from an accredited institution and a minimum of three years of teaching experience. Student teaching counts towards this requirement.

KIMEP University

KIMEP University is Central Asia's leading American-style, internationally accredited, English-language academic institution. The university provides a world-class academic experience and a unique international environment to all its students and faculty. All academic programs are ranked among the top in Kazakhstan.

Almaty, Kazakhstan

The city of Almaty is a beautiful, modern, and vibrant city situated at the base of the majestic Tien Shan Mountains in Southeast Kazakhstan. With a population of 2 million people, it is the financial and cultural capital of Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is located in Eurasia's heart, with important commercial inroads bridging Asia and Europe. Its dynamically changing economic, social, educational, and cultural environment provides incredible opportunities for significant and original research.

Compensation

Rank and salary are competitive and commensurate with experience and qualifications. Compensation after-tax compares favorably with net salaries in Western countries. Combined with a low cost of living, the salary becomes even more competitive in real terms.

Limited on-campus housing is available to rent. In addition to salary, a benefits package includes basic healthcare, reduced tuition rates for KIMEP courses, and a relocation allowance subsidy. Summer paid teaching is typically available. The salary will be subject to a deduction of 10% income tax.

Application Process

Please submit the following documents to the KIMEP University HR portal: https://hr.kimep.kz/en-US/Home/Vacancy/60

Address any questions to recruitment@kimep.kz

Closing dates for submission of applications: June 15th, 2024

Applications will be evaluated on an ongoing basis and will continue until the position is filled. Only shortlisted candidates will be informed and invited for interviews by the search committee.

Read more from the original source:

Faculty Position in Computer Science job with KIMEP University | 37661552 - The Chronicle of Higher Education

Read More..

Linea Exploit Reveals Decentralization Flaws in Ethereum L2s – Crypto Times

The recent hack on Ethereum layer-2 blockchain Linea, which led to the transfer of over $2.6 million in Ether (ETH) from the platform, underscores the urgent need for greater decentralization among layer-2 solutions, according to Alex Gluchowski, CEO of Matter Labs.

Linea, launched by ConsenSys, faced a security breach on June 2 when a hacker exploited Velocore, a decentralized exchange built on Linea. In response, Linea temporarily halted block production to mitigate further damage, highlighting centralized controls vulnerabilities.

The exploit involved moving 700 Ether (worth over $2.6 million) off Linea using a third-party bridge. Block production was paused between blocks 5081800 and 5081801.

The hack was first detected by Hexagate, which identified the stolen funds, vulnerable smart contracts, and exploiter addresses. Due to time zone differences, Linea could not immediately contact Velocore.

Gluchowski emphasized the necessity of decentralizing the sequencer, a critical component of layer-2 networks, stating, Decentralizing the sequencer isnt optional. Every serious L2 stack must race to do it first. Matter Labs, the company behind zkSync, is one of Lineas competitors.

Linea resumed block production, but halting the zkEVM blockchain highlighted the urgent need for decentralization, as noted by Gluchowski.

Declan Fox, Lineas product lead, acknowledged the importance of decentralization and assured that Linea is on track to achieve this more quickly than many of its peers. Given that many Rollup frameworks more than 2 years older than us are no further ahead, Im pretty delighted with our pace, Fox responded.

Despite the hack, Linea is pushing forward with its ambitious The Linea Voyage: Surge campaign, aiming to increase the total value locked (TVL) on the platform to $3 billion. Currently, around $1.2 billion is locked on Linea, according to L2BEAT.

Some critics have questioned the wisdom of setting such lofty goals after the hack. However, Linea defended its decision to halt the sequencer, stating it was a necessary step to protect users funds.

Also Read: Crypto Hacks Surge 666% & Losses $574.6 Million in May 2024

See the article here:

Linea Exploit Reveals Decentralization Flaws in Ethereum L2s - Crypto Times

Read More..

Linea pledges decentralization after halting block production to stop hacker – crypto.news

Ethereums layer-2 solution Linea is promising greater decentralization after the projects team manually halted block production in a bid to censor a hackers address.

Linea, Ethereums zkEVM solution designed to improve scalability with over $1 billion in locked value, has found itself in hot water over its what appears to be ambiguous decision to stop the whole network in a bid to censor one address associated with a hacker, who attacked Linea-based decentralized exchange Velocore for $7 million.

Because other avenues of handling this exploit closed, our team halted the sequencer to prevent additional funds bridging out. This was the last resort action to protect users on Linea.https://t.co/xfXec1O0ef

In an X thread on Jun. 3, the team behind the project confirmed the suspension of block production, saying it was not a decision we took lightly.

One of the key drivers in our decision to pause the sequencer was that the hacker had acquired and was beginning to sell a large sum of tokens into ETH. This would have created other issues in the ecosystem for users beyond the liquidity pool draining exploit.

Linea

The pause in block production, spanning a critical hour between block 5,081,800 and 5,081,801, allowed Linea to assess the situation. During the period, efforts were made to engage with the Velocore team and coordinate responses to the vulnerability, the thread reads.

The move, however, raised concerns among members of the crypto community, raising their eye brows due to the move that blocked the whole network with over $1.2 billion in value, according to data from L2Beat.

Stopping block production with over $1.2B in assets on the Linea chain. You're calling it decentralization? Lmaoo. pic.twitter.com/onFUNuWHKZ

Linea acknowledged that its current reliance on centralized technical operations highlights the need for ongoing efforts to transition towards a fully decentralized, censorship-resistant network, noting though that its core values are permissionless and censorship-resistant environment.

In parallel, both Linea and Velocore teams have initiated measures to address the exploit, including on-chain negotiations and coordination with centralized exchanges to freeze exploited funds. The Velocore team has released a post-mortem on the exploit, outlining affected pools and ongoing efforts to compensate affected users.

Original post:

Linea pledges decentralization after halting block production to stop hacker - crypto.news

Read More..

Linea blockchain halt highlights slow decentralization of Ethereum L2s – TradingView

Ethereum layer-2 blockchain Lineas decision to halt block production after being hacked highlights the need for layer-2 firms to prioritize decentralization sooner rather than later, says Alex Gluchowski, CEO of Matter Labs.

On June 2, more than $2.6 million in Ether ETHUSD was transferred off Consensys-launched Linea after the hacker managed to exploit Linea-based decentralized exchange Velocore, Linea explained in an X post.

Linea has since resumed block production, but the teams decision to halt the zkEVM blockchain showcased the need for decentralization on Ethereum layer was flagged by Gluchowski.

Decentralizing the sequencer isnt optional. Every serious L2 stack must race to do first, said Gluchowski, whose firm is behind one of Lineas competitors in zkSync.

It received a response from Lineas product lead, Declan Fox, who agreed that decentralization isnt an option but stressed the network is on a solid path to decentralizing in a far shorter time window than many of its competitors.

Given that many Rollup frameworks more than 2 years older than us are no further ahead, Im pretty delighted with our pace.

Linea announced its The Linea Voyage: Surge campaign in April, which will aim to increase the total value locked on Linea to $3 billion. According to L2BEAT, a little over $1.2 billion is locked on the blockchain currently.

However, one onlooker criticized the firm for setting such a target in light of the recent hack.

Lineas halt was a "last resort" action

The Linea team said it had no option but to halt its sequencer to prevent additional funds from bridging out.

This was the last resort action to protect users on Linea.

Linea said it was notified of the hack by Hexagate, which helped trace the stolen user funds, vulnerable smart contracts and exploiter addresses. Linea said they couldnt immediately contact Velocore as it was the middle of the night in their timezone.

Like other L2s, we are still in the training wheels phase of existence, giving us safeguards to use.

The hacker exploited Linea-based DEX Velocore, which moved 700 Ether worth over $2.6 million off Linea via a third-party bridge.

The sequencer was paused between blocks 5081800 and 5081801.

The firm stressed its intention to decentralize Lineas network in the future, including its sequencer, which would prevent the firm from halting block production and censoring addresses.

Meanwhile, Velocore said it is working with external networks involved to issue reimbursements to impacted victims.

Linea stressed that its network remains safe and secure.

Consensys launched Linea in August 2023, onboarding over 50 partners and bridging more than $26 million in Ether at the time.

Almost all Ethereum layer-2 solutions remain centralized, including Base.

According to L2BEAT data, Coinbase is currently the sole sequencer of Base. However, the firm has also asserted its intention to progressively decentralize Base over time.

Continue reading here:

Linea blockchain halt highlights slow decentralization of Ethereum L2s - TradingView

Read More..

PolkaPort East launches in Hong Kong, supporting the decentralization of Polkadot ecosystem – Finbold – Finance in Bold

Web3 Foundation has announced a new grant awarded to PolkaPort East, aimed at furthering decentralization and bolstering community engagement within the Polkadot (DOT) ecosystem, as per the latest info shared with Finbold on June 4.

This Decentralized Futures grant is the first such grant to an organization in Asia.

PolkaPort East, an independent entity focused on investor relations and growth initiatives in Hong Kong and the Greater Bay Area, will utilize the grant to drive regional growth.

The initiative aims to promote Polkadots technology, fostering strategic investments and collaborations in the local ecosystem.

Max Rebol, co-founder of PolkaPort East and CEO of Harbour Industrial Capital, a venture capital fund centered on Polkadot, emphasized the strategic timing of PolkaPort Easts launch, stating:

The launch of PolkaPort East comes at a crucial moment for Polkadot. It represents a critical step towards increasing the networks decentralization while strengthening the ecosystems strategic position in Hong Kong.

Thibault Perrard, likewise a PolkaPort East co-founder, added:

With the support of the DF grant, PolkaPort East will be tapping into the thriving innovation hubs of Hong Kong and the Greater Bay Area while engaging and fostering relationships with local governments, global enterprises and capital allocators of the region.

Reflecting his colleagues sentiment, David Hawig, Director of Ecosystem at Web3 Foundation, likewise expressed enthusiasm for the PolkaPort East initiative:

The Web3 Foundation is thrilled to support the Polkaport East initiative through a Decentralized Futures grant. This project exemplifies our commitment to fostering decentralized access and innovation within the Polkadot ecosystem. We believe Polkaport East will play a pivotal role in enhancing connectivity and empowering the community in Hong Kong, driving forward the vision of a truly decentralized internet.

The initiative will attract participants across Asia, including developers, venture capitalists, and Web3 investors, and engage with university blockchain collectives, fintech companies, and local governments exploring blockchain technology.

Web3 Foundation launched the Decentralized Futures initiative in 2023 to support independent teams driving Polkadots success.

Inspired by Parity Technologies restructuring to focus solely on technical development, the program offers funding to both profit-driven and non-profit Polkadot-oriented organizations.

The program has dedicated an initial $20 million and 5 million DOT tokens to expand the Polkadot ecosystem, ensuring ongoing innovation.

Link:

PolkaPort East launches in Hong Kong, supporting the decentralization of Polkadot ecosystem - Finbold - Finance in Bold

Read More..

Are Ethereum ETFs a Threat to Decentralization? – CCN.com

Key Takeaways

Ethereum (ETH) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are expected to begin trading as early as July this year, but they could pose a threat to the network itself.

Looking at over 1 million Bitcoin tokens now in the possession of exchange-traded products (ETPs) around the world, what happens when ETH ETFs accumulate massive portions of the ETH supply that they wont be allowed to stake?

Following the launch of Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs, questions over whether or not BTC would become centralized emerged. This was fueled further when U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chair, Gary Gensler, quipped that theres a certain irony to the Bitcoin ETFs.

Speaking with CNBC shortly after their launch, Gensler noted:

Think about the irony of those who would say this week is historic, he said. Now you can buy [Bitcoin] through this thing called an exchange-traded product thats, well, centralized.

There is the added conundrum of the SECs investigation into the Ethereum Foundations sale of ETH since the Merge in 2022, in which they are trying to determine if Ethereums switch to proof-of-stake (PoS) constituted a security offering.

Staking involves locking up crypto to secure and further decentralize the network, as well as validate transactions in exchange for rewards. This is a major part of Ethereums PoS mechanism, and as far as the SEC is concerned, staking services may constitute unregistered securities offerings.

This view resulted in the SEC taking action against Coinbase and Kraken, alleging violations of federal securities laws for their staking services. Therefore, the SEC has required ETH ETF applicants to remove staking from their ETF proposals.

Aside from missing out on additional profits provided by staking, there are some broader implications for the Ethereum ecosystem. If staking is removed from ETFs, a large portion of the ETH token supply will be held up in funds. This could impact token supply, network security, and decentralization as therell be less staked ETH.

However, if staking was included and such significant portions of Ethereums supply poured into funds as we have seen with Bitcoin, would it mean that institutions could gain dominance over Ethereum by centralizing its staked supply into ETFs?

Staking-enabled ETH ETFs exist in other countries, theyre not a new concept, but the scale of U.S. markets can have significant impact on market dynamics. The removal of staking from U.S. ETFs is contentious.

As a short-term solution to appease the SEC through the approval process may cause significant long-term pains. As pointed out by S&P Global:

U.S. spot ether ETFs that incorporate staking could become large enough to change validator concentrations in the Ethereum network, for better or worse,

If multiple ETF issuers use the same custodian, just as Coinbase is the primary custodian for a majority of BTC ETFs, the increased concentration of ETH could lead to operational risks like market collusion.

Coinbase is expected to be the custodian for six of nine Ethereum ETF issuers. The exchange is already the second-largest Ethereum validator, and the risk to network security due to a single point of failure will be heightened if a single entity commands a growing number of nodes.

ETFs represent a shift toward centralization, which is at odds with the core ethos of cryptocurrency. In cryptos quest for legitimacy, the holy grail that ETFs were thought to be were perhaps nothing more than a gift horse.

If interest in ETH ETFs is similar to U.S. BTC ETFs, which currently command over $61 billion worth of BTC, the power of concentration could certainly pose a threat to Ethereums security.

Theres no telling if ETF issuers will enable staking in the future. Regardless, there is no consensus over whether or not it will have a positive or negative impact on the Ethereum network itself.

Without staking, the Ethereum network could be exposed to security risks. With staking, Ethereum could be exposed to centralization risks. Unfortunately, there doesnt appear to be a middle ground, especially when there is no clear guidance or regulations when it comes to crypto staking.

Whether or not staking is enabled, what is clear is that new digital asset custodians will need to emerge, which will distribute ETF stakes broadly, which could contribute to mitigating concentration risk.

Ensuring Ethereum remains secure and decentralized is going to require greater concentration risk monitoring, as well as a collective effort to continue mitigating concentration risks. This would include ensuring that no single validator or group gains disproportionate power.

ETFs represent a shift toward centralization, which is at odds with the core ethos of cryptocurrency. In cryptos quest for legitimacy, the holy grail that ETFs were thought to be were perhaps nothing more than a gift horse.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

View post:

Are Ethereum ETFs a Threat to Decentralization? - CCN.com

Read More..

What is Non-Custodial Staking and Why It Matters for Decentralized Finance? – FinSMEs

Staking is a crucial process in many blockchain networks that helps secure transactions and maintain the overall health of the system.

In traditional staking models, users entrust their assets to a third-party custodian, who manages the staking process on their behalf. This approach, known as custodial staking, has been the norm for quite some time. However, a new approach called non-custodial staking is gaining traction in the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem, offering users greater control, security, and transparency. Non-custodial staking represents a paradigm shift in the way users interact with blockchain networks and participate in the validation and security processes, aligning with the core principles of decentralization and self-sovereignty that underpin the DeFi ecosystem.

What is Staking?

Staking involves committing or locking a portion of ones cryptocurrency holdings to participate in the validation and confirmation of transactions on a blockchain network. By doing so, stakers play a crucial role in maintaining the networks security and integrity. In return for their contributions, stakers receive rewards in the form of newly minted tokens or transaction fees. This incentive mechanism is a key component of many proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithms, which are designed to be more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly compared to proof-of-work (PoW) systems like Bitcoin. PoS algorithms rely on stakers to validate transactions and create new blocks, rather than relying on energy-intensive mining processes. As such, staking has become an essential part of many blockchain networks, enabling users to participate in the networks operations while earning rewards for their contributions.

Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Staking

In custodial staking, users transfer their assets to a third-party platform or exchange, which then manages the staking process on their behalf. This approach offers convenience, as users do not need to worry about the technical aspects of staking. However, it also comes with significant risks. By relinquishing control of their assets to a custodian, users are exposed to the potential loss of their funds due to platform hacks, mismanagement, or other security breaches. Additionally, custodial staking often lacks transparency, as users have limited visibility into the staking processes and the management of their assets.

Non custodial staking, on the other hand, allows users to participate in staking without relinquishing control of their private keys or assets. Instead of relying on a third-party custodian, users interact directly with decentralized protocols and smart contracts deployed on blockchain networks. This approach ensures that users maintain full ownership and autonomy over their holdings throughout the staking process. By retaining control of their private keys, users significantly reduce the risk of losing their assets due to platform hacks or mismanagement. Furthermore, non-custodial staking promotes the core principles of decentralization and self-custody, aligning with the ethos of blockchain technology and the DeFi ecosystem.

How Non-Custodial Staking Works

Non-custodial staking involves interacting with decentralized protocols and smart contracts deployed on blockchain networks like Ethereum. These protocols are designed to facilitate staking processes in a decentralized and trustless manner, without the need for a centralized intermediary. Users connect their non-custodial wallets, which allow them to manage their private keys and digital assets, to these protocols. Once connected, users can delegate their stakes to validator nodes or liquidity pools without transferring asset ownership.

The staking process is governed by transparent, open-source code, ensuring that users can verify and audit the underlying mechanisms. This level of transparency is a key advantage of non-custodial staking, as it promotes trust and accountability within the ecosystem. By interacting directly with these decentralized protocols, users can participate in staking while maintaining full control over their assets.

To start non-custodial staking, users typically follow these steps:

1. Choose a non-custodial staking platform or protocol that supports the desired cryptocurrency or blockchain network.

2. Connect a compatible non-custodial wallet to the chosen platform or protocol.

3. Select the asset and amount to stake, based on the platforms requirements and the users holdings.

4. Delegate the stake to a validator node or liquidity pool, following the platforms specific instructions.

Throughout this process, users retain full control over their private keys and assets, ensuring that they can manage their stakes and rewards without relying on a third-party custodian.

Flexibility and Control

Another significant advantage of non-custodial staking is the flexibility and control it offers to users. Unlike custodial staking models, where users may face restrictions or delays in accessing their funds, non-custodial staking allows users to withdraw or transfer their staked assets at any time, subject to the specific protocols conditions.

This level of control and flexibility is particularly important in the dynamic and rapidly evolving DeFi ecosystem, where users may need to respond quickly to market conditions or take advantage of new opportunities. By maintaining full control over their assets, users can make informed decisions and adapt their strategies as needed without being constrained by the limitations of custodial staking platforms.

Potential for User Error

While non-custodial staking empowers users with greater control over their assets, it also introduces the potential for user error. Mistakes in transaction signing, loss of private keys, or interactions with malicious smart contracts can lead to the loss of staked assets.

Users must exercise caution and follow best practices for secure key management and transaction verification. This includes using hardware wallets, enabling multi-factor authentication, and thoroughly reviewing and understanding the protocols and smart contracts they interact with.

Market and Regulatory Risks

Like any cryptocurrency investment, non-custodial staking is subject to market volatility and fluctuations in asset value. The value of staked assets can fluctuate significantly, impacting the potential rewards and returns for stakers.

Additionally, the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies and DeFi is still evolving, introducing potential uncertainties and risks. Changes in regulations or legal frameworks could impact the operations of non-custodial staking protocols or the broader DeFi ecosystem.

Users should stay informed about market conditions and regulatory developments, and carefully consider the associated risks before engaging in non-custodial staking activities.

Why Non-Custodial Staking Matters for DeFi

Non-custodial staking plays a crucial role in promoting the core principles of decentralization and user empowerment that underpin the DeFi ecosystem. By reducing reliance on centralized entities and custodians, non-custodial staking enhances the resilience and decentralization of blockchain networks.

In the traditional financial system, individuals often rely on intermediaries and centralized institutions to manage their assets and facilitate financial transactions. This centralization of power and control has led to issues such as lack of transparency, high fees, and limited access to financial services for many individuals and communities.

The DeFi ecosystem aims to address these challenges by creating a more open, transparent, and inclusive financial system built on decentralized technologies like blockchain. Non-custodial staking plays a crucial role in this vision by empowering users to take control of their financial assets and participate in the validation and security processes of blockchain networks without relying on intermediaries.

Promotes Decentralization

By reducing reliance on centralized entities and custodians, non-custodial staking enhances the resilience and decentralization of blockchain networks. When users stake their assets through non-custodial protocols, they contribute to the decentralization of the networks validation and consensus processes, making it more resistant to censorship, manipulation, or single points of failure.

This decentralization is a fundamental tenet of the DeFi ecosystem, as it aims to create a more equitable and inclusive financial system that is not controlled by a single entity or group of entities.

Encourages Innovation

The open and permissionless nature of non-custodial staking protocols fosters innovation and the development of new DeFi applications and services. Developers can build upon these protocols, creating novel financial products and expanding the DeFi ecosystem.

By enabling users to participate in staking and earn rewards without relying on centralized intermediaries, non-custodial staking protocols create new opportunities for individuals to generate passive income and participate in the growth of the DeFi ecosystem.

Additionally, the transparency and trustlessness of non-custodial staking protocols encourage experimentation and innovation, as developers can build upon these open and auditable systems, fostering the creation of new financial instruments and services that better meet the needs of users.

Future Trends and Predictions

As the DeFi space continues to evolve, non-custodial staking is expected to gain even more traction and adoption:

Increasing integration with broader DeFi ecosystems: Non-custodial staking protocols will become more tightly integrated with other DeFi applications and services, enabling users to seamlessly participate in various DeFi activities while maintaining self-custody of their assets.

Advances in user-friendly interfaces and security features: Efforts will be made to develop more intuitive and user-friendly interfaces for non-custodial staking, making it more accessible to a wider audience. Additionally, advancements in security features, such as improved key management solutions and smart contract auditing tools, will further enhance the safety and reliability of non-custodial staking.

Emergence of new staking models and incentive mechanisms: As the DeFi ecosystem continues to evolve, we may see the emergence of new staking models and incentive mechanisms that further enhance the potential rewards and benefits for participants. These innovations could include novel ways of distributing rewards, new types of staking assets, or the integration of staking with other DeFi primitives.

Regulatory clarity and adoption: As regulatory frameworks around cryptocurrencies and DeFi become more established, we may see increased adoption and mainstream acceptance of non-custodial staking solutions. Regulatory clarity could provide greater confidence and certainty for both users and developers, fostering further growth and innovation in this space.

Conclusion

Non-custodial staking represents a paradigm shift in the way users interact with blockchain networks and participate in the validation and security processes. By offering enhanced security, transparency, and control, non-custodial staking aligns with the core principles of decentralization and self-sovereignty that underpin the DeFi ecosystem.

As the DeFi space continues to grow and evolve, non-custodial staking will play an increasingly important role in empowering users, promoting decentralization, and fostering innovation. By enabling individuals to participate in the validation and security of blockchain networks without relying on centralized intermediaries, non-custodial staking has the potential to shape the future of finance in a more open, inclusive, and trustless manner.

However, it is important to acknowledge and address the challenges and risks associated with non-custodial staking, such as technical complexity, potential for user error, and market and regulatory uncertainties. Continued efforts to improve user education, develop user-friendly interfaces, and establish clear regulatory frameworks will be crucial in ensuring the widespread adoption and success of non-custodial staking solutions.

Ultimately, non-custodial staking represents a significant step towards realizing the vision of a decentralized and self-sovereign financial system, where individuals have greater control and autonomy over their assets and financial activities. As this approach continues to gain traction, it has the potential to empower users, foster innovation, and reshape the future of finance in a more equitable and inclusive manner.

The rest is here:

What is Non-Custodial Staking and Why It Matters for Decentralized Finance? - FinSMEs

Read More..

The hacking of Velocore: a chronicle of the incident with Linea – The Cryptonomist

Linea, a Layer 2 blockchain based on Ethereum, has recently reaffirmed its commitment to the complete decentralization of the network after deliberately suspending block production in response to a security exploit involving Velocore, a decentralized exchange operating on the platform.

The incident, which occurred on June 2, led to an unauthorized withdrawal of over 7 million dollars in ether, highlighting critical vulnerabilities and prompting Linea to take decisive measures to protect its community and digital assets.

On June 2nd, Velocore experienced a significant cyber attack that resulted in the theft of over 7 million dollars in ether. The hackers exploited a vulnerability in Velocores protocol, managing to drain the funds from the system.

This event has raised immediate concerns about the security of the entire Linea network, leading to the decision to temporarily suspend block production to assess the situation and implement the necessary countermeasures.

In response to the attack, Linea made the extraordinary decision to temporarily suspend block production. This move allowed developers to focus entirely on analyzing the exploit, identifying security flaws, and preventing further losses. While this suspension temporarily interrupted normal operations on the network, it represented a necessary step to ensure the security and integrity of the blockchain.

After the incident, Linea clarified that its main objective remains the complete decentralization of the network. This strategic direction was reiterated not only as a response to the specific incident with Velocore, but also as part of the long-term vision of the project.

Decentralization is seen as a key element to increase the resilience of the network, reducing the risks associated with centralized control points that can become targets of attacks.

Decentralizing a blockchain network brings numerous advantages. First of all, it increases the overall security of the system by distributing control and reducing vulnerability to single points of attack.

Furthermore, a decentralized network can ensure greater transparency and trust among users, as no single entity can manipulate or influence the operations of the blockchain.

In the context of Linea, decentralization also means greater participation from the community and stakeholders in the networks governance. This approach can lead to more balanced decisions that represent the interests of users, improving the equity and sustainability of the project in the long term.

Following the hacking of Velocore and the suspension of block production, Linea has announced a series of measures to accelerate the decentralization process. These include:

The incident with Velocore represented a critical moment for Linea, highlighting the challenges and vulnerabilities that even advanced blockchain networks can face. However, the proactive response of the project, with the suspension of block production and the reaffirmation of the decentralization plan, demonstrates a strong commitment to the security and integrity of the network.

In the long term, complete decentralization will not only improve the resilience of Linea, but also the trust and engagement of the community. This incident could prove to be a catalyst for a more robust and decentralized network, capable of facing future challenges with greater effectiveness and transparency.

Continued here:

The hacking of Velocore: a chronicle of the incident with Linea - The Cryptonomist

Read More..

Linea faces criticism over block production halt – Crypto Briefing

Share this article

Ethereum layer-2 blockchain Linea has come under scrutiny from the crypto community following its decision to unilaterally stop block production in response to a hack on Velocore, a decentralized exchange (DEX) operating on its network. The move has ignited a discussion about the importance of decentralization and censorship resistance in the blockchain industry.

The Velocore hack resulted in the transfer of 700 ETH, worth over $2.6 million, from the Linea network via an undisclosed third-party bridge. Linea stated that it halted the sequencer to prevent further funds from being bridged out after failing to contact the DEX team promptly. The blockchain also censored the hackers addresses to mitigate the impact on its users.

Linea defended its actions, stating that the hacker was starting to sell a significant amount of tokens for ETH, which could have led to additional problems for users beyond the liquidity pool-draining exploit.

However, the crypto community has criticized Lineas decision, with some arguing that it contradicted the core principles of decentralization and censorship resistance.

Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius Labs and a Solana supporter, acknowledged the reasoning behind the move but questioned its long-term implications. Alex Gluchowski, CEO of Matter Labs, stressed the importance of decentralization for all sequencers and called on layer-2 solutions to prioritize integrating decentralization into their platforms.

In response to the criticisms, Linea reaffirmed its commitment to decentralizing its network and sequencer to prevent similar incidents in the future. The blockchain stated that its goal is to create a permissionless, censorship-resistant environment where the team will no longer have the power to halt block production or censor addresses.

When our network matures to a decentralized, censorship-resistant environment, Lineas team will no longer have the ability to halt block production and censor addresses this is a primary goal of our network, Linea stated.

Linea also noted that most competing networks still depend on centralized technical operations to safeguard ecosystem participants. The incident has reignited the debate about the role of centralized entities in decentralized systems and the blockchain trilemma challenges faced by protocols and networks on the matter of balancing security, decentralization, and scalability for users.

Share this article

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

Crypto Briefing may augment articles with AI-generated content created by Crypto Briefings own proprietary AI platform. We use AI as a tool to deliver fast, valuable and actionable information without losing the insight - and oversight - of experienced crypto natives. All AI augmented content is carefully reviewed, including for factural accuracy, by our editors and writers, and always draws from multiple primary and secondary sources when available to create our stories and articles.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

Read the original:

Linea faces criticism over block production halt - Crypto Briefing

Read More..

Massive Ticketmaster, Santander data breaches linked to Snowflake cloud storage – The Verge

A data breach potentially affecting as many as 560 million Ticketmaster accounts and a confirmed one for Santander Bank may have stemmed from attacks on the cloud storage accounts with a company called Snowflake. As spotted by Bleeping Computer, an investigation from cybersecurity firm Hudson Rock reports that a bad actor gained access to Ticketmaster and Santander by using the stolen credentials of a single Snowflake employee.

According to Hudson Rock, the hacker bypassed the authentication service Okta using these credentials and then generated session tokens to obtain a trove of information from Snowflake. In addition to Ticketmaster which publicly acknowledged the breach later on Friday evening and Santander Bank, Hudson Rock suggests the hacker may have gained access to hundreds of other Snowflake customers. A few of the major brands that use the cloud storage service include AT&T, HP, Instacart, DoorDash, NBCUniversal, and Mastercard.

Snowflake has seemingly disputed Hudson Rocks findings in its most recent response, saying that while investigating potentially unauthorized access to certain customer accounts, it observed increased threat activity beginning mid-April 2024 from a subset of IP addresses and suspicious clients we believe are related to unauthorized access.

More details on those findings are available here, but the company says that while a bad actor accessed a demo account belonging to a former employee, it didnt contain sensitive information. It claims that To date, we do not believe this activity is caused by any vulnerability, misconfiguration, or malicious activity within the Snowflake product.

Even before Ticketmaster confirmed the breach, malware tracker vx-underground said it could assert with a high degree of confidence that the leaked data is legitimate. It notes that some of the leaked information dates back to the mid-2000s and includes full names, emails, addresses, phone numbers, hashed credit card numbers, and more.

Earlier this month, Santander published a statement to confirm that certain information of customers in Chile, Spain, and Uruguay had been accessed. The Verge reached out to Ticketmaster and Santander with requests for comment but didnt immediately hear back.

Go here to read the rest:
Massive Ticketmaster, Santander data breaches linked to Snowflake cloud storage - The Verge

Read More..