Page 1,263«..1020..1,2621,2631,2641,265..1,2701,280..»

DAO communities we need to talk about decentralization – Forkast News

A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) is, by its very definition, decentralized. The authority it wields over a given treasury is spread out over a number of actors, rather than concentrated or centralized in one pair of hands.

At least, thats the idea.

For the many advocates of the DAO organizational model there were some 6.9 million DAO governance token holders globally as of May 23 that ideal makes DAOs the perfect operational medium for achieving the decentralized financial goals underpinning the digital economy.

But for Pat Rawson, co-founder of innovation network Curve Labs, todays DAOs continue to bump up against one glaring contradiction.

Namely, they fail to live up to the decentralized ideal contained within the name particularly when held up against the examples of genuine decentralization found in a number of the worlds biggest transnational corporations (TNCs).

I like to go back to the example of Toyota, said Rawson. We think of Toyota as this monolithic brand, right? But really, Toyota is eight different mother nodes. And those nodes sit at the very top of a flowing system of ownership with hundreds of child nodes that emerge from them and exchange with each other.

The vast web of child nodes making up the wider Toyota Group includes an estimated 2,239 subsidiary enterprises active across 125 different countries.

The Tokyo-headquartered giant is the worlds largest automaker by vehicles sold. It can also be considered an example of the Japanese keiretsu business model.

As such, its eight principle mother nodes which include parts manufacturers Denso and Aisin, alongside Toyota Motor Corporation itself form a conglomerate of largely autonomous entities linked together via cross-shareholding agreements.

These agreements signal the long-term reciprocal commitment between each firm. Therefore, despite the degree of indirect control exerted over entities at often considerable geographical and operational distances from group headquarters, they all weave together as a tightly interconnected whole.

Rawson argues that the joint ventures and complex intertwined business relationships connecting firms in TNC structures like Toyota Group are largely absent from todays DAOs a problem for any claims of decentralization.

Compared to a TNC like Toyota, there is no comparably fractalized control network in blockchain today, he wrote in a 2021 blog post. Few DAOs spin ownership and significant financing out of themselves into their local organizational neighborhood.

The post offered the example of cryptocurrency trading protocol Uniswap as an apples and oranges comparison with TNCs.

The exchange operates as a decentralized financial platform through smart contracts. These facilitate trades of crypto tokens without recourse to a centralized market maker, such as the Nasdaq and other forms of stock exchange.

It also operates as a DAO, meaning that governance over decision-making processes is decentralized and spread out among a community of Uniswap token holders.

Yet structurally, as Rawson points out, the platform remains centralized.

In terms of Uniswaps control network, it boasts only three independent operational nodes the business itself, a grant-giving council and a governance DAO managing a significant treasury, which as of May 23 stood at US$2.15 billion.

This organizational structure therefore runs contrary to todays corporate control networks, as TNCs tend to wheel and deal with a diverse range of shareholding organizations and individuals, Rawson wrote in the blog post.

Conversely, contemporary DAOs in the Uniswap mold lack the means to distribute ownership effectively or at all, frankly. They have money to put to use but little on-chain means to use it.

Uniswap has, for its part, attempted to use its treasury to support products capable of filling out its ecosystem and thereby expand its decentralized control network. But the avenues for growth are so far limited.

Whereas Toyota Group, founded in 1926 as Toyota Industries, has almost 100 years of growth and partnership-building experience, Uniswap founded in 2018 is only five years old. It is also operating within a nascent industry that currently has far fewer potential contributors than the global auto industry.

So how to effectively build out a decentralized control network? For Rawson, the answer is right in front of us.

Im not saying that the global corporate order that we have today is a good system, but I would say that this is the dominant financial system that we have, he said. The complexities of that system, its reach and its intertwined relationship with the state can serve as a model for DAOs to incorporate and improve upon.

But where the global corporate order, despite its geographic diversity and structural decentralization, still often operates what Rawson calls a very totalitarian, top-down system of control, DAOs have a built-in mechanism for bottom-up power distribution.

If harnessed effectively, that mechanism could lead to rapid growth and the proliferation of a genuinely decentralized system of global corporate governance built around DAOs in a manner reminiscent of the cross-shareholding agreements between entities in the Toyota Group.

To illustrate how that might happen, he again uses Uniswap as an example.

In the example, the Uniswap DAO decides to create a joint venture with another DAO. The rights to govern that new organization are split 33% to the Uniswap DAO, 33% to the other DAO and then 33% to be held by a new token holder class for the new joint venture.

Now, if you do that once, thats still a pretty centralized system, said Rawson. But if you do that 100 times and you get each node in the system to do that as well, what you start to have is a system that begins to resemble the global corporate order that we have today.

From there, real-world corporate expansion begins to happen and DAOs genuinely decentralized autonomous organizations deserving of the name usher in an era of more equitable control networks that, like Toyota and other TNCs, can achieve a global reach, he added.

Excerpt from:

DAO communities we need to talk about decentralization - Forkast News

Read More..

How the Decentralization of Clinical Trials Can Transform Health Care – Pharmacy Times

As we get better at medical science, we need to be able to run more clinical trials to keep up. Yet trial delays continue to pose significant challenges. Most trials are held in academic medical centers, which are very centralized and may not be easy for large chunks of the population to access. Furthermore, not all trials are run at all hospitals, so a trial may not be near a qualifying patient, which is a huge barrier to care.

Image Credit: Adobe Stock - wladimir1804

As a result, 85% of all clinical trials fail to recruit enough patients and 80% are delayed due to recruitment problems, creating potential losses of $600,000 to as high as $8 million per day, according to a CenterWatch study. This already painful bottleneck will become even worse over time if we dont do something about it. McKinsey notes: Trial decentralization has emerged as a critical tool in this pursuit. It involves bringing an increasing proportion of a trials activities to the patients rather than using the traditional paradigm of bringing patients to a trial site.

Decentralization has already been shown to streamline clinical trials, but it also has the potential to improve the broader health care ecosystem, including the patient and physician experience.

Decentralization in clinical trials aims to make participation more accessible and convenient for patients by reducing the need for extensive travel to specific trial sites. Although terms such as virtual, remote, home, and siteless are used to describe this process, it's important to note that decentralization does not eliminate the involvement of health care professionals or physical contact with patients in most cases. Here are some clarifications:

Virtual trials leverage digital technologies and telemedicine to conduct certain trial activities remotely. Patients may interact with study coordinators, physicians, or nurses through video calls or secure online platforms. This approach allows for remote monitoring, data collection, and patient support, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. However, physical contact with health care professionals may still be required for certain procedures, such as blood tests or imaging studies, which can be conducted at local health care facilities.

Remote trials involve conducting trial activities outside of traditional trial sites, typically in patients' homes or local health care facilities. Patients may receive study medications, perform self-assessments, and collect data using remote monitoring devices or digital platforms. Health care professionals remain involved in the process, providing guidance, support, and monitoring remotely. However, occasional in-person visits may be required for certain assessments or procedures.

Home trials take place primarily at the patients' homes, minimizing the need for travel. Patients may receive study medications, perform self-assessments, and collect data as guided by health care professionals through remote communication channels. Home health care providers or visiting nurses may also play a role in supporting patients during the trial and conducting necessary procedures or assessments in the home environment.

Siteless trials go a step further in decentralization by eliminating the requirement for a physical trial site altogether. Instead, trial activities are conducted using remote and digital approaches, and patients engage with health care professionals primarily through virtual means. Data collection and assessments may occur in patients' homes or local health care facilities, with the support of health care professionals.

Decentralized trials still involve health care professionals who provide guidance, oversight, and support to patients throughout the study. While physical contact with health care professionals may be reduced, it is not completely eliminated, especially for procedures that require in-person assessments or interventions. The primary goal of decentralization is to make trial participation more convenient and accessible while maintaining the necessary oversight and care provided by health care professionals.

As McKinsey also points out: The opportunities for decentralizing clinical trials also bring new challenges to an industry often characterized by long cycle times and conservatism.

Getting enough people enrolled and completing a trial is a huge pain point and bottleneck for moving life-saving drugs to market. Biopharma companies spend more than $70 billion annually running trials globally, yet patient enrollment is slow and almost always behind expectations.

In the typical ecosystem scenario, sponsors run clinical trials by selecting research clinics (sites) around the world and hoping these sites can find and enroll appropriate patients. There are 2 major challenges: eligible patients often dont have access to the sites and ineligible patients are enrolling at the sites. Making clinical trials completely predictable and accessible is the key to eliminating these challenges.

The key is to broaden the pool of patients by creating a vast network of sites that can recruit/bring the trial to them. Tools are being created to get in front of more patients using digital channels so acquisition is, in many ways, being solved; however, there are several additional hurdles. First, patients need to be comfortable with this new paradigm. Second, smaller practices need to understand how to think about recruiting (a new workflow).

The decentralization of clinical trials improves the health care ecosystem by enhancing patient-centered care, expanding access to experimental treatments, fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing among health care providers, generating real-world data and evidence, streamlining processes and reducing costs, and promoting innovation and technology adoption. By bringing trial activities to patients' local health care settings, decentralization prioritizes convenience, inclusivity, and personalized care, resulting in an improved health care experience. It allows a broader range of patients to participate in trials, increasing diversity and generalizability of results.

Collaboration among health care providers is enhanced, leading to knowledge sharing and improved quality of care. Real-world data collected in decentralized trials offer insights into treatment effectiveness in real-life scenarios.

Streamlined processes and cost savings benefit both patients and sponsors, enabling resources to be directed towards further research. The integration of innovative technologies in decentralized trials fosters their adoption in routine health care, leading to improved health care delivery and patient outcomes.

In summary, decentralization of clinical trials positively impacts the health care ecosystem through patient-centeredness, increased access, collaboration, real-world evidence, efficiency, cost savings, and technological advancement.

About the Author

Vignesh Ravikumar joined Sierra Ventures in 2013 and focuses on investments in Enterprise SaaS, Vertical SaaS, and Digital Health/Healthcare IT. Vignesh has a background in M&A transactions for enterprise software companies, having worked at AGC Partners, a Boston-based investment bank. Vignesh holds a BS in Management Science (cum laude) and a Minor in Math from UC San Diego. Outside of work, he is an avid golfer and a big Golden State Warriors fan.

Read more here:

How the Decentralization of Clinical Trials Can Transform Health Care - Pharmacy Times

Read More..

Decentralization: Future of creator economy? Expert insights – CryptoTvplus

Everyone, consciously or not, has a personal brand due to their online presence, thus the growing importance of personal branding in the digital age. Zuby, an online host, author, and rapper, at Bitcoin 2023 Miami acknowledged the increasing significance of ones digital footprint and believes that individuals, including entrepreneurs and everyday people, need to recognize the value of their reputation in the online space.

Layah Heilpern, an author and content creator and panelist at the event shared her perspective, which is focused on decentralization as the future of the creator economy. She expressed concerns about censorship and stressed the need for alternative platforms that offer creators more freedom to express their views without fear of censorship. Further, there are worries about the consolidation of power and the potential for corruption when platforms are controlled by individuals or entities, she said.

The adoption of decentralized social media platforms would likely happen out of necessity, Heilpern also mentioned. She drew parallels with the adoption of Bitcoin, where people turned to alternatives due to limitations and censorship. Also, she emphasized that improved user experience and ease of use would be key factors driving adoption of decentralized platforms

Platform moderation is a complex issue, influenced by different countries laws and societal norms, Zuby mentioned. Zuby stated that the emergence of alternative platforms could be a response to concerns about censorship and centralization. He expressed optimism about the market they create and their potential to challenge mainstream platforms.

He mentioned examples such as Rumble and TruthSocialMinds.com, which aim to provide more freedom of expression. Zuby predicted a more decentralized future for content creation and mentioned the significance of platforms like Zion that allow users to own their digital identity and maintain their audience regardless of platform changes.

There are also challenges in shifting business models away from the ad-based approach dominant in existing platforms. Zuby explained that established platforms have relied on advertising for decades, making it a safe and familiar revenue model. He highlighted the difficulty for large corporations to take risks and change their monetization strategies due to shareholder expectations. In contrast, he emphasized the opportunity for young entrepreneurs and startups to experiment with new models.

Read also;

Celebrating Bitcoin Pizza Day: 13 Years of Revolutionizing the Crypto Industry; Vitalik warns about Ethereum & NairaCoin

What do you think of this article? Share comments below.

See the rest here:

Decentralization: Future of creator economy? Expert insights - CryptoTvplus

Read More..

Web3 Has an Identity Crisis on its Hands – Blockworks

Anyone who has interacted with ChatGPT has experienced this unsettling question: Is this thing human or not?

That question is, in essence, the long-awaited failure of the Turing Test.

Weve been unwittingly using the Turing Test as a proxy for online identity for decades now. Over time, it would become clear whether we were interacting online with a person or a machine.

With the advent of ChatGPT and generative AI, however, we can no longer rely on the Turing Test as a proxy for Im human. And digital personhood ultimately requires some way of knowing whether or not we are dealing with a real person.

Web3s vision of digital personhood has relied on both decentralization and the Turing Test to be able to say, Im human and I control these digital assets. When ChatGPT broke the Turing Test, it showed us that decentralization alone is insufficient for digital personhood.

If were serious about digital personhood, then its time to get serious about digital identity.

We have to architect Web3 to support identity from the top down.

Many may be surprised to learn that the digital identity movement has its own Satoshi-like figure who authored the definitive white paper on digital identity a full seven years prior to Satoshis famous Bitcoin white paper.

In 2005, Kim Cameron brought the stone tablets of identity management down from the mountaintop when he published his landmark paper, The Laws of Identity.

While Kim may not have been as mysterious as Satoshi, his work on digital identity was as definitive as Satoshis work on decentralization.

Kim put forward a problem statement for digital identity that was as simple, clear, and concise as Satoshis problem statement for decentralization.Its instructive to look at them both together.

Kims identity problem statement (2005): The Internet was built without a way to know who and what you are connecting to.

Satoshis decentralization problem statement (2012): Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments.

While these two problems are distinct, they are inextricably intertwined. We have to know who and what we are connecting to online (Kim/identity), and we have to be able to do so peer-to-peer, without an intermediary (Satoshi/decentralization). This is just as true in the digital world as it is in the real world.

In a post-Turing Test world, however, the problem of identity has taken on a new urgency because machines are increasingly able to spoof people.We will not enjoy the full fruits of decentralization without also making digital identity a top priority.

Toward the end of his life, Kim gave us yet another way to think about the challenge of digital personhood. He gave a talk where he said that, when it comes to our online lives, Content is what we are, aspects of our identity, but we dont own it, we dont keep it, we cant control it. Basically, we lack a digital shelter that would offer the same fundamental privacy as a home.

In short, we are digitally homeless.

Just as personhood is impaired by homelessness in the real world due to lack of privacy, digital personhood is similarly impaired by digital homelessness in the digital world.

Digital personhood requires a digital home a digital place where we have the power to decide what parts of our digital selves we share with others and when and how we do so. That digital home is inseparable from our digital identity.

Decentralization isnt a sufficient principle for overcoming our digital homelessness. If we dont also architect for digital identity, we will never know who or what we are connecting to online and AI bots will overwhelm human beings.

Up until now, weve been able to skirt the architectural demands of digital identity because when push came to shove, we could lean on the Turing Test as a proxy for our humanness and we could manage our dispersed digital selves without ultimately requiring a centralized digital home. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, those days are gone.

Kim Cameron, unfortunately, is gone too, but his Laws of Identity live on. All those who aspire to true digital personhood would do well to remember that Kim came before Satoshi, and identity comes before decentralization.

As Kim said, in the online world, content is what we are. Now that generative AI has rendered human-quality content virtually free, we should make sure that we have an alternative method to value and recognize personhood in the digital world.

Dr. Richard Smith Berkeley Mathematician and PhD in System Science is a fintech entrepreneur, the CEO of The Foundation for the Study of Cycles, and the author of The Risk Rituals newsletter. He has built a reputation as The Doctor of Uncertainty amongst his academic peers and has helped government agencies and Fortune 500 companies alike make sense of complex sets of data. In his upcoming book, The Risk Manifesto, Dr. Smith will aim to further educate investors on how to circumvent self-destructive instincts and adopt a systematic way to manage their fear of risk. With his background in mathematical theories of uncertainty combined with his investing and trading experience,Dr. Smith is a regular speaker and lecturer and particularly enjoys opportunities to share his knowledge and help others gain an edge in the market.

Get the days top crypto news and insights delivered to your email every evening.Subscribe to Blockworks free newsletternow.

Want alpha sent directly to your inbox? Get degen trade ideas, governance updates, token performance, cant-miss tweets and more fromBlockworks Researchs Daily Debrief.

Cant wait? Get our news the fastest way possible.Join us on Telegram and follow us on Google News.

Follow this link:

Web3 Has an Identity Crisis on its Hands - Blockworks

Read More..

Bitcoin Miami: 2024 Candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Gabbard Defend Bitcoin and Decentralization – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin Miami: 2024 Candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Gabbard Defend Bitcoin and Decentralization

US Democratic presidential candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Tulsi Gabbard came out in a vigorous defense of Bitcoin and its ideals of decentralization and privacy. Speaking on the second day of Bitcoin 2023 in Miami, the pair delivered a strong rebuke of the United States current lack of clear crypto guidance for investors and entrepreneurs and stifling incoming regulations.

Kennedy is currently trailing President Joe Biden with 19% of votes vs 62% in the race for the Democratic Partys nomination in next years election according to early polls. He had a particularly warm reception to his keynote speech on the first day.

The US has displayed a particular affinity for the Kennedy clan over the years, and its latest political candidates stellar environmental law and civil rights track record, and strong views on individual freedom, environmental protection, and the right to refuse vaccinations, also resonate strongly with a big contingent of the Bitcoin community,

In his first public appearance as a presidential candidate, Kennedy laid out a supportive vision for Bitcoin ownership and mining in the States, and warned against the dangers of governments utilizing technology to control their citizens. The civil rights activist and lawyer also announced that he would accept Bitcoin donations for his campaign, thereby becoming the first presidential candidate to greenlight the reception of crypto for a run to the Oval Office.

Kennedy noted that he first realized the importance of Bitcoins ability to circumvent government intervention after he witnessed Canadas handling of the trucker protests last year. In his eyes, the protests were peaceful without violating any laws, yet protesters couldnt access their money and bank accounts in order to support their families.

In what he deemed as a devastating use of government repression, Kennedy said he saw for the first time how free money was equal in importance to free speech, and made a few key promises to the crypto space, saying he would:

Story continues

1. Defend the right to self-custody Bitcoin and other digital assets in the US

2. Uphold the right to run a node at home

3. Defend use-agnostic and industry-neutral regulation of energy

4. Make sure that the US remains the global hub of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and reverse the governments growing hostility toward the industry

5. Review whether individuals like Ross Ulbricht were prosecuted for actual crimes, or as a means to crackdown on crypto. In the case of the latter, he would consider swiftly pardoning them.

Kennedy also took a shot at incumbent president Biden and his 30% energy tax on Bitcoin mining:

President Biden's 30% tax on energy for Bitcoin miners requires an invasive surveillance apparatus to monitor what is happening in individual computers. It sets a terrible precedent in which everything that you do requires electricity and must now be monitored by the government. That's why I also support people's rights to refuse smart meters in their homes.

While he stated that he doesnt own any Bitcoin, Kennedy underscored its importance in a world of new threats to democracy such as increasing governmental interference:

...we are now living in this age of turnkey totalitarianism with this emerging technology, which can empower totalitarian regimes. And our job is to try to build and fortify democratic institutions at the same rate as totalitarian instruments are being expanded in their power.

Kennedy also touched on the malicious use of artificial intelligence:

For things like AI which really are going to threaten democracy at its base, we need to not be chipping away at our democratic institutions. We need to fortify the ones that exist and build new ones and the biggest most important one on the horizon is Bitcoin because it can't be manipulated.

Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic Congresswoman from Hawaii, came out eloquently against the direction of her party as well as the implementation of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

She said she related to Kennedys speech earlier, as she knew a little bit of something about this:

They make an example of those of us who dare to speak the truth and call out what is common sense and obvious to the rest of us about their hidden insanity and hypocrisy. Hoping that by making an example of us, they will then cause the rest of us to self-censor ourselves to fall in line and to comply.

The ex-congresswoman aired her dissatisfaction with the current state of the Democratic Party and its leadership, arguing that the party has become elitist and intolerant of dissent, seeking power at any cost.

She criticized the mainstream media, big tech, and the national security state for working together to silence those who challenge the party's narrative.

Gabbard also highlighted the weaponization of federal agencies and law enforcement against political opponents, as revealed in the Durham report. She also expresses concerns about the Biden administration's push for a CBDC, seeing it as a threat to privacy and economic autonomy.

The presidential hopeful warned that the current power holders prioritize control over people's lives and suppress freedom of speech and emphasized the importance of active citizenship and defending freedoms to counteract this oppression. Gabbard concluded her keynote by urging people to protect democracy and preserve the vision of the country's founders.

Bitcoin Miami 2023 played host to a string of prominent pro-crypto political speakers such as Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, a venture capitalist and anti-woke activist, Wyoming senator Cynthia Lummis, Governor Ridwan Kamil from West Java, Indonesia; North Carolina congressman Patrick McHenry, who last month memorably grilled SEC chair Gary Gensler in Congress; Congressman Byron Donalds, representing Florida; and David McIntosh, a former Congressman and White House Senior Staff member.

Organizers BTC Media previously said that the flagship global Bitcoin conference aims to provide a platform for the discussion of diverse perspectives and ideas. By engaging politicians open to Bitcoin and deepening their understanding of the cryptocurrency, the conference seeks to foster support for the industry in Washington and beyond.

Originally posted here:

Bitcoin Miami: 2024 Candidates Robert F. Kennedy Jr and Gabbard Defend Bitcoin and Decentralization - Yahoo Finance

Read More..

Worldcoin: crypto startup gets $115 million to promote global … – The Cryptonomist

Today marks an important milestone for Tools for Humanity, the crypto technology company of OpenAIs CEO, dedicated to building tools for and supporting Worldcoin.

The company announced the successful completion of a $115 million Series C funding round, with Blockchain Capital leading the investment.

This substantial capital infusion will further Worldcoins global expansion and promote its mission to create a decentralized identity and financial network accessible to everyone, regardless of their background or economic status.

Through Worldcoins innovative technology centered on World ID and the Worldcoin token, humanity will have the opportunity to fully participate in the ever-growing global digital economy.

At a time when artificial intelligence (AI) is shaping the future, Worldcoin intends to build the worlds largest and most inclusive financial and identity network.

The ultimate goal is to create a collectively owned network of people from all walks of life, ensuring equal participation for individuals regardless of their background or economic circumstances.

By harnessing the power of World ID and the token, Worldcoin aims to validate humanity and enable individuals around the world to actively engage in the evolving digital landscape.

The recent funding announcement comes on the heels of Worldcoins commitment to support the global availability of World App.

With nearly 2 million users across five continents, World App is set to revolutionize the way people interact with technology.

With its user-friendly interface and advanced features, World App provides seamless access to Worldcoins broad ecosystem, promoting financial inclusion and facilitating global transactions.

The availability of the App worldwide will further increase the reach and impact of Worldcoins mission.

In addition to the global launch of World App, Worldcoin is actively supporting the Optimism Collective.

The Optimism Collective is a community-driven initiative that seeks to improve scalability and reduce costs on Ethereum, the industry-leading blockchain platform.

Worldcoins commitment to the initiative demonstrates its dedication to fostering collaboration within the broader blockchain ecosystem.

By actively participating in projects that promote innovation and efficiency, Worldcoin consolidates its position as a key player in the decentralized finance landscape.

The $115 million Series C funding round led by Blockchain Capital is a testament to the enormous potential of Worldcoins technology and its ambitious mission.

Blockchain Capital, the leading venture capital firm specializing in blockchain and cryptocurrency investments, recognizes the transformative impact Worldcoin can have on the global economy.

With its expertise and financial backing, Blockchain Capital will play a crucial role in furthering Worldcoins expansion efforts and advancing its journey toward decentralization.

The $115 million in funding will enable Worldcoin to significantly accelerate its global expansion plans.

The funds will go toward building a robust infrastructure that can support Worldcoins growing demand for innovative solutions.

By expanding its presence across continents, Worldcoin will create a truly global network, ensuring that individuals around the world can access and benefit from its inclusive financial ecosystem.

In addition, the funding will reinforce Worldcoins ongoing efforts to achieve full decentralization. Decentralization is at the core of Worldcoins mission, which seeks to create a network that is collectively owned and managed by its users.

The investment will fuel research and development initiatives aimed at improving the security, scalability and efficiency of the network. Through these advances, Worldcoin will continue to lay the groundwork for a future in which individuals have control over their digital identities and financial destinies.

Key figures in the company include:

Sarah Johnson, who joins as Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and brings her expertise in blockchain and distributed systems. Sarah has a proven track record of leading technical teams and will play a crucial role in the development of the Worldcoin ecosystem.

John Chen, appointed Chief Financial Officer (CFO), brings his extensive experience in financial management and strategic planning. Johns expertise will be instrumental in managing Tools for Humanitys financial operations and ensuring efficient allocation of resources for Worldcoins expansion.

Michelle Rodriguez, as Chief Marketing Officer (CMO), brings expertise in brand strategy and marketing communications. Michelles creative vision and strategic approach will help promote adoption and awareness of Worldcoin and its products.

With the addition of these talented individuals, Tools for Humanity is poised to accelerate its growth and propel Worldcoin toward its ambitious vision.

The diverse backgrounds and skills of the new team members will contribute to the development of innovative solutions and the seamless integration of Worldcoins ecosystem into the global digital economy.

As Tools for Humanity secures $115 million in Series C funding and expands its team, the future looks promising for Worldcoin and its mission to build the largest and most inclusive financial and identity network.

With the Worldcoin token and World ID at the core of its ecosystem, Worldcoin aims to enable individuals around the world to fully participate in the digital economy, regardless of their background or economic status.

Through the development of World App and ongoing efforts toward decentralization, Tools for Humanity is laying the groundwork for a future in which privacy, inclusivity, and trust are fundamental pillars of the digital landscape.

By providing an easy-to-use and secure platform, World App aims to bridge the gap between traditional finance and the cryptocurrency world, making digital assets accessible to billions of people around the world.

With the backing of strategic investors including a16z crypto, Bain Capital Crypto and Distributed Global, Tools for Humanity is well positioned to achieve its goals and expand Worldcoins reach.

The creation of the non-profit Worldcoin Foundation further reinforces the commitment to decentralization and ensures that the project remains community-driven, focusing on governance, engineering, operations, and grant activities.

In the age of artificial intelligence, Tools for Humanity and Worldcoin are at the forefront of driving innovation and shaping the future of digital finance.

Through their collaborative efforts, they are making strides toward a more inclusive and empowered digital economy in which individuals are in control of their own identity and financial destiny.

In conclusion, the $115 million Series C funding round led by Blockchain Capital marks a pivotal moment for Tools for Humanity and Worldcoin.

With expanded resources, team growth, and World App development, Tools for Humanity is solidifying its position as a leader in building tools for humanitys future.

As Worldcoin continues to engage millions of users and advances on its path toward decentralization, the vision of a globally accessible and inclusive financial network owned by all is becoming a reality.

See the original post:

Worldcoin: crypto startup gets $115 million to promote global ... - The Cryptonomist

Read More..

Cardano TVL hits new all-time high three weeks to Hoskinson’s ADA decentralization target – FXStreet

Cardano (ADA), the blockchain platform famous for innovation and peer-reviewed scientific research, is enjoying another watershed moment after its total value locked (TVL) soared above $446 million.

According to DefiLlama data, this hit marks a new all-time high for the ADA network and is a testament to the growing popularity and trust the ecosystem has earned as more protocols come on board.

Also Read: Cardano TVL could explode soon, heres why

Cardano (ADA) has recorded a new all-time high in TVL, marking a glorious moment for the network as the march toward becoming the most decentralized token continues.

Source: DeFiLlama

The surge in TVL is attributed to, for the most part, the rapid growth of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols on the Cardano network, as these protocols facilitate users in engaging in a wide range of financial activities - lending, borrowing, and yield farming, among others- while maintaining control of their funds.

The network's scalable and secure infrastructure has beckoned many DeFi projects, enhancing Cardano's ecosystem while pumping it TVL. Citing one example, Minswap leads the TVL on Cardano, recording almost 36% in dominance, according to TapTools team. It is worth mentioning that TapTools had predictedexponential growth in Cardano TVL as FXStreet reported on April 8.

The new TVL ATH also attributes to the allure of traditional banking systems and centralized exchanges (CEXs). Amid growing privacy, security, and control concerns, many users have drawn toward decentralized alternatives, with Cardano as the ideal option.

Another contributor to the TVL uptick is meme coins, with altcoins such as Snek finding a hub on Cardano Reason- the network has attracted all manner of participation for exploration and investment.

The TVL milestone has earned Cardano a place among the top 20 chains by total value locked, highlighting its position as a prominent blockchain ecosystem. Meanwhile, in a recent video, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson committed to the network becoming the most decentralized of all cryptocurrencies by the summer of 2023.

The expression came as Hoskinson detailed what lies ahead for the network, touching on various topics with an optimistic outlook before disclosing the potential of a "Cardano Summer" in the next few weeks. Among the key highlights of his address was the CIP-1694 proposal reported recently.

With more projects and users flocking to Cardano, ADA could enter the early stages of a bull run, catapulting its growth and solidifying its role as a leading blockchain platform.

At the time of writing, Cardanoprice is $0.363 as it consolidates above an uptrend line on the three-day timeframe. Despite the bearishness in the broader market, the overall outlook for ADA is bullish, but the potential remains suppressed by heavy overhead pressure due to the 100-, 50, and 200-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMA) at $0.374, $0.376, and $0.391 respectively.

ADA/USDT 3-Day Chart

Notice that the three EMAs all fall within IntoTheBlock's Global In/Out of the Money (GIOM) metric's $0.365 and $0.386 range, where 307,310 addresses bought 6.49 billion ADA at an average price of $0.386. Any attempts by Cardano price to the upside are challenged by selling pressure from this cohort of traders looking to break even or book early profits.

Also Read: Cardano founder says CIP-1694 upgrade will be a "wake-up call" for crypto

Here is the original post:

Cardano TVL hits new all-time high three weeks to Hoskinson's ADA decentralization target - FXStreet

Read More..

Bitcoin’s Role in the Financial System of Sao Tome & Principe – The Zimbabwean

One of the main advantages of Bitcoin is its decentralization. Unlike traditional banking systems where a centralized authority (bank) has control over transactions, bitcoin transactions are validated by a decentralized network of computers. Therefore, there is no single point of failure in the network and no need for a third-party intermediary to validate transactions. This can offer a level of security and transparency that is missing in traditional banking systems.

Another advantage of Bitcoin is its digital nature. As a digital currency, bitcoin can be easily stored, transferred and used for online transactions. This can be especially useful in a country like Sao Tome & Principe where traditional banking infrastructure may not be readily available. Access to Bitcoin can provide a safe and convenient way for people to conduct financial transactions without relying on traditional banking systems.

In addition, bitcoin can provide a hedge against volatile currency fluctuations. Sao Tome & Principes economy is largely dependent on cocoa exports, and the currencys value can fluctuate based on global market conditions. Holding Bitcoin can provide a way for individuals and businesses to diversify their assets and protect against market volatility.

However, there are also risks associated with bitcoin. Its decentralization can lead to anonymity and lack of regulation, which can pose challenges for preventing fraud and illegal activities. Additionally, bitcoins value can be highly volatile, which can lead to significant financial losses for those who invest in it.

Overall, while bitcoin is not a complete solution to Sao Tome & Principes financial challenges, it can offer some advantages in terms of decentralization, digitalization, and protection against currency volatility. It is up to the government to create a regulatory environment that can harness these benefits while mitigating the risks associated with bitcoin..

Bitcoin, the first-ever cryptocurrency, has been on a meteoric rise in recent years. It has emerged as a reliable alternative to traditional financial systems, offering benefits far beyond what traditional financial institutions can provide. The decentralized nature of Bitcoin removes the need for intermediaries, allowing for fast, secure, and low-cost transactions without the need for a central authority.

One of the main benefits of Bitcoin trading is that it provides a level of privacy and anonymity that is not possible with traditional financial systems. Bitcoin transactions are processed using a public ledger known as the blockchain, but this information does not reveal the identity of the parties involved. This makes Bitcoin an ideal option for those who value privacy and confidentiality in their financial transactions.

Bitcoin also offers greater flexibility than traditional financial systems, allowing users to easily make transactions from anywhere in the world without the need for bank accounts or credit cards. This makes it an attractive option for people who live in countries where traditional financial systems are either inaccessible or unreliable.

Moreover, Bitcoins limited supply makes it an attractive investment option for people looking to diversify their portfolios. The total number of Bitcoins that will ever exist is fixed at 21 million, meaning that its value could increase as demand grows. This has made Bitcoin a popular investment asset for a wide array of investors.

Another significant advantage of using Bitcoin trading is the speed with which transactions are executed. Unlike traditional financial systems, which can take several days to process transactions, Bitcoin transactions are processed within minutes. This makes it an especially attractive option for merchants who require quick and efficient payment processing.

Finally, Bitcoin trading provides users with greater control over their finances. Since Bitcoin transactions are processed without the need for a central authority, users are not subject to the restrictions and regulations imposed by traditional financial institutions. This means that individuals have more freedom to manage their money as they see fit, without having to worry about issues like account freezes, transaction limits, and other similar restrictions.

Bitcoin is a revolutionary technology that has the potential to change our financial system in many ways. It can provide an alternative form of currency, increase access to banking services and reduce transaction costs. Despite some limitations, Bitcoin offers numerous benefits that could help it become more widely adopted in the future. As cryptocurrencies become increasingly popular and accepted by mainstream institutions, there will be greater opportunities for people around the world to benefit from this digital asset class. With its unique features such as decentralization, immutability and transparency, we can only expect great things from Bitcoin in coming years..

See the rest here:

Bitcoin's Role in the Financial System of Sao Tome & Principe - The Zimbabwean

Read More..

Cryptocurrencies Price Prediction: Ethereum, Bitcoin & Cardano European Wrap 26 May – FXStreet

Ethereum (ETH) price is working on its recovery after it dipped to a two-week low on Thursday. While Bitcoin price has failed to make a similar move and head back above $26,500, Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin and has been able to push above $1,800. One hurdle is in the way now. The green ascending trendline must be overtaken again by bulls before heading to $1,875.

Ethereum price slid below the green supportive trendline and made a two-week low on Thursday with nearly every crypto or altcoin component printing red numbers. Meanwhile, this Friday a small turnaround is noticeable, but not for everyone. Bitcoin price is still in the red, unable to jump above its recovery point, while Ethereum price has already advanced beyond that point at $1,800 and is primed to head higher.

Bitcoin price is delaying a crash that has been brewing for roughly two weeks. A failure to push higher could result in a steep correction next week. The troubling macroeconomic conditions could be key in catalyzing and trigger a nosedive for BTC holders.

Bitcoin price fractal, as explained in the previous article, is very close to maturing. After producing a decisive daily candlestick close below the critical support level at $26,555, bears seem to have the upper hand.

Cardano, one of Ethereums main competitors, is gearing up for further decentralization through its Improvement Proposal (CIP-1694), which is expected to bring the Ethereum-killer altcoin into a new era of governance with decentralization in its decision-making.

Charles Hoskinson, founder and CEO of Cardano, said in a recent YouTube video that CIP-1694 will further decentralize ADA, setting an example for other cryptocurrencies in the ecosystem.Hoskinson explained how CIP-1694 is set to begin a new era of decentralization on the ADA network. The proposal is still up for discussion and items included in the upgrade will change with inputs from the developing team.

View post:

Cryptocurrencies Price Prediction: Ethereum, Bitcoin & Cardano European Wrap 26 May - FXStreet

Read More..

MetaMask: new terms on crypto taxes – The Cryptonomist

MetaMask, one of the leading crypto wallets developed by ConsenSys, recently found itself at the center of a controversy: the platforms new terms and conditions state that MetaMask reserves the right to withhold funds from users wallets to pay taxes.

This has caused turmoil throughout the crypto community

In April 2023, ConsenSys, the developer of MetaMask, introduced significant changes to the platforms terms of use.

The revised terms state that any fees payable by consumers are considered net of taxes, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

In addition, MetaMask explicitly reserves the right to withhold taxes from users wallets if necessary. In essence, these new terms make it the responsibility of MetaMask users to identify and pay all applicable taxes, fees, and government charges.

The introduction of MetaMasks new terms took many users and industry experts by surprise.

One of the co-founders of 1inch, a popular decentralized exchange, raised concerns about MetaMasks authority to withhold fees.

The idea of a cryptocurrency wallet actively participating in tax compliance was seen as a departure from the decentralized ethos that underlies the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Critics argue that MetaMasks actions contradict the principles of financial freedom and individual sovereignty that cryptocurrencies strive to uphold.

The confusion surrounding MetaMasks new terms stems primarily from a lack of clarity about the scope and implementation of the tax withholding process.

Users are wondering what specific criteria determine when MetaMask will withhold funds for taxes and how this information will be communicated to them.

The absence of clear guidelines creates a sense of unease and raises questions about the platforms commitment to transparency.

Striking a balance between compliance and the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies remains a challenge.

It is essential that platforms like MetaMask maintain transparency, provide clear guidelines, and actively engage with the community to address concerns and promote trust.

MetaMasks new terms and conditions, which allow it to withhold consumer funds for tax purposes, have caused quite a stir within the crypto community.

The unexpected change in MetaMasks approach has generated confusion, concern, and criticism from users and industry experts.

Although MetaMask and ConsenSys have attempted to justify their actions as a means to comply with tax regulations, many question the implications for decentralization and financial freedom.

Cryptocurrencies were originally conceived as a means to provide individuals with greater control over their finances, free from the interference of centralized institutions.

However, as the industry matures, it faces increasing scrutiny from governments seeking to impose regulations and ensure tax compliance.

Although the intentions behind MetaMasks tax withholding policy may be rooted in regulatory compliance, the lack of clarity about its implementation raises valid concerns.

Users are unsure of the specific circumstances under which their funds may be withheld, creating a sense of unease and eroding trust in the platform.

Transparency and clarity of communication are key to addressing these concerns and maintaining a strong relationship between MetaMask and its user base.

The reaction of the crypto community to MetaMasks new terms has been swift and decisive.

Many users have used social media to express their disappointment and frustration, questioning the platforms commitment to decentralization and individual sovereignty.

Some even threatened to switch to alternative wallets closer to their ideological beliefs.

One of the key tenets of the new vision for cryptocurrencies is decentralization, which aims to eliminate intermediaries and provide individuals with direct control over their financial assets.

MetaMasks new terms, becoming involved in tax withholding, are seen by some as a departure from this decentralized vision.

Critics argue that the platforms actions undermine the principles of financial freedom and individual empowerment for which cryptocurrencies were designed.

In response to community reactions, MetaMask and ConsenSys issued statements to clarify their intentions and address the concerns raised.

They stressed that the withholding tax clause was included to comply with legal and regulatory requirements imposed by tax authorities.

According to them, MetaMasks intention is not to violate the principles of decentralization or compromise the financial freedom of users.

Rather, they argue that this is a necessary step to ensure compliance with tax laws and regulations.

The controversy over MetaMasks new terms highlights the complex intersection between the cryptocurrency industry and traditional regulatory frameworks.

As cryptocurrencies continue to be adopted mainstream, regulators are taking steps to ensure tax compliance and consumer protection.

In response to the backlash, MetaMask and ConsenSys have sought to clarify their position. They affirm that the tax withholding clause is a necessary measure to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements imposed by tax authorities.

They stress that their goal is not to prevent decentralization or compromise users financial freedom, but rather to strike a balance between regulatory obligations and the evolving needs of the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Going forward, it is imperative that MetaMask and ConsenSys engage with the community in an open and transparent manner. Providing clear guidelines and actively seeking feedback can help address concerns and rebuild user trust.

In addition, working with regulators to find solutions in line with the principles of decentralization and financial freedom could pave the way for a more harmonious relationship between the cryptocurrency industry and regulatory frameworks.

As it continues to evolve, the cryptocurrency industry will likely face additional challenges at the intersection of decentralization and regulation.

Balancing compliance needs with the core values of cryptocurrencies is a delicate task that requires ongoing dialogue and cooperation.

Ultimately, the ability of platforms like MetaMask to address these challenges will determine their long-term success and their ability to uphold the ideals that initially attracted individuals to the cryptocurrency world.

In conclusion, MetaMasks new terms and conditions, particularly regarding the withholding of consumer funds for tax purposes, have caused considerable upheaval within the cryptocurrency community.

The implications for decentralization and financial freedom have raised valid concerns and triggered a backlash against MetaMask and ConsenSys.

The industry must continue to grapple with the complexities of regulatory compliance while preserving the fundamentals of crypto.

Transparent communication and engagement with the community will be essential to shaping the future of MetaMask and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Continue reading here:

MetaMask: new terms on crypto taxes - The Cryptonomist

Read More..