Lidos dominance in the Ethereum staking market should raise serious concerns about Ethereums centralization, say the heads of the decentralized autonomous organization Asymmetry Finance. The potential impact of centralization on Ethereum could be catastrophic, leading to market crashes and protocol failures. Will regulators and community members wake up in time?
Since the Bitcoin Whitepaper in 2008, centralization has been the dream and driving force behind cryptocurrency.However, like many good things, it is easier said than done. Ethereums upgrade to proof-of-stake (PoS) last year brought many benefits. But, if you ask many in the liquid staking community, it also had serious downsides. Although, to first understand the problem, you need to understand Lido (LDO).
Lido (LDO) solves one of the biggest issues with staking tokens on a PoS blockchain like Ethereum: illiquidity. Essentially, in traditional staking, your tokens become locked up in the staking processthe consensus mechanism that secures the blockchain.
Instead of completely locking up your crypto assets, liquid staking allows you to receive tokenized versions of your deposited funds.
Launched in 2020, Lido supports Ethereum 2.0 liquid staking, as well as other layer-1 PoS blockchains like Solana, and Polkadot. Lido makes staking on Ethereum easier by allowing users to stake smaller amounts of Ether and still earn rewards. However, the minimum barrier for staking Ethereum is 32ETH (or about $60,000 at the time of writing).
An intimidating amount of money, to be sure. Although Lido Finance presents a solution. It lowers the financial barrier to staking ETH by enabling users to pool their ETH and stake any amount. So whats the problem?
Unfortunately, Lidos popularity has been a double-edged sword. It dominates the Ethereum ecosystems liquid staking derivatives and raises concerns about its impact on Ethereums decentralization as it experiences rapid and exponential growth. Even Vitalik Buterin, Ethereums founder and mastermind, has acknowledged the risk it poses.
Lido running 38% of validators is more than double that of which Vitalik said is too much for any single entity to control, Justin Garland, co-founder of Asymmetry Finance, said in a discussion with BeInCrypto.
Additionally, only 18% of ETH is currently staked. In Solana, more than 80% of the native token supply is staked and securing the network. In Avalanche, that number is above 60%. More ETH must be staked, as it further secures the entire network.
Asymmetry was founded to address the centralization of the Liquid staking tokens and derivatives market. When you deposit into Asymmetry, you receive a share of multiple staked Ethereum derivatives, which helps decentralize the staked Ethereum market. They plan to launch their flagship product afETH in the fall of this year.
Should the centralization vis-a-vis Lido keep you up at night? If you build or operate on Ethereum, maybe. For Hannah Hamilton, Asymmetry Finances other co-founder, the potential outcome is catastrophic.
[It] means mass chaos. Crash of markets. Potentially the loss of everything that is on Ethereum. DeFi protocol failure for those integrated with Lido. It would be the worst crash within DeFi weve ever seen nearly incomprehensible, Hamilton told BeInCrypto.
One protocols failure should not ever be allowed to obtain enough reach such that it would have an impact of this magnitude on the entire industry. This is why it is imperative that we decentralize this market, she added.
Its not entirely clear that everyone understands these risks, added Garland. Which calls for more education on what exactly decentralization means in practice.
To note, 66% of the nodes on the Ethereum network must agree on the state of the network to reach consensus, Garland explained.
According to Rated Network, Lido has 32.9% network penetration or the amount of stake that maps under one entity. Meaning if Lido gets to 33% and there was an attack or bug, Lido could single handedly stop the Ethereum network from reaching consensus. This means Ethereum itself stops functioning properly.
Having too many validators on Ethereum isnt the solution either, added Hamilton.
The validator set would become messy and individuals are more likely to get slashed historically than market-leading validators. Thus, an ecosystem with a larger number of market leading validators (not just Lido, but a more even split among Lido, Rocketpool, Ankr, Stakewise, etc.) that have good infrastructure set up for secure validating, but also with none of them dominating the market, she stated.
It can be a struggle to get legislators with a non-financial background to understand the intricacies of centralized finance (or CeFi). So how to tackle the steep learning curve with DeFi and Ethereum staking?
US regulators certainly dont understand these risks, or any others in the crypto ecosystem, continued Hamilton. Additionally, we dont think they yet understand that DeFi solves many problems that currently threaten the traditional financial system. For example, the numerous defaulted loans and credit risk contagion weve seen in CeFi simply cannot happen within DeFi.
She continued: On Aave, the decentralized lending platform, no loans were defaulted on because they cant be. The smart contracts dont allow it. If youre undercollateralized, your position is liquidated because that is what the smart contract dictates. We need this transparency in all financial markets.
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.
Read the original post:
Is Ethereum Staking Too Centralized? - BeInCrypto
Read More..