Cloud Hosting

Li, C. et al. India Is overtaking china as the worlds largest emitter of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 14304 (2017).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Koukouli, M. E. et al. Anthropogenic sulphur dioxide load over China as observed from different satellite sensors. Atmos. Environ. 145, 4559 (2016).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Wakefield J. A toxicological review of the products of combustion. Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental; 2010.

Hu, Y. et al. Optimization and evaluation of SO2 emissions based on WRF-Chem and 3DVAR data assimilation. Remote Sensing 14(1), 220 (2022).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Zhou, F. & Fan, Y. Determination of the influence of fuel switching regulation on the sulfur dioxide content of air in a port area using DID MODEL. Adv. Meteorol. 2021, 6679682 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Lavery, C. B., Marrugo-Hernandez, J. J., Sui, R., Dowling, N. I. & Marriott, R. A. The effect of methanol in the first catalytic converter of the Claus sulfur recovery unit. Fuel 238, 385393 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Li, J., Kobayashi, N. & Hu, Y. The activated coke preparation for SO2 adsorption by using flue gas from coal power plant. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 47(1), 118127 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Yang, C. et al. Characterization of chemical fingerprints of ultralow sulfur fuel oils using gas chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Fuel 343, 127948 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kaminski, J. Technologies and costs of SO2-emissions reduction for the energy sector. Appl. Energy 75(3), 165172 (2003).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Duan, Y., Duan, L., Wang, J. & Anthony, E. J. Observation of simultaneously low CO, NOx and SO2 emission during oxy-coal combustion in a pressurized fluidized bed. Fuel 242, 374381 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ma, X., Kaneko, T., Xu, G. & Kato, K. Influence of gas components on removal of SO2 from flue gas in the semidry FGD process with a powderparticle spouted bed. Fuel 80(5), 673680 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Gound, T. U., Ramachandran, V. & Kulkarni, S. Various methods to reduce SO2 emission-a review. Int. J. Ethics Eng. Manage. Educ. 1(1), 16 (2014).

Google Scholar

Crdoba, P. Status of Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) systems from coal-fired power plants: Overview of the physic-chemical control processes of wet limestone FGDs. Fuel 144, 274286 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Surez-Ruiz, I. & Ward, C. R. Chapter 4: Coal combustion. In Applied coal petrology (eds Surez-Ruiz, I. & Crelling, J. C.) 85117 (Elsevier, 2008).

Chapter Google Scholar

Ren, Y. et al. Sulfur trioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants in China and implications on future control. Fuel 261, 116438 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hall, B. W., Singer, C., Jozewicz, W., Sedman, C. B. & Maxwell, M. A. Current status of the ADVACATE process for flue gas desulfurization. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 42(1), 103110 (1992).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Arthur LF. Silicate sorbents for flue gas cleaning. The University of Texas at Austin; 1998.

Dzhonova, D., Razkazova-Velkova, E., Ljutzkanov, L., Kolev, N. & Kolev, D. Energy efficient SO2 removal from flue gases using the method of Wellman-Lord. J. Chem. Technol. Metall. 48, 457464 (2013).

Google Scholar

zyuuran A, Mericboyu A. Using Hydrated Lime and Dolomite for Sulfur Dioxide Removal from Flue Gases. 2012.

Xu, X.-J. et al. Simultaneous removal of NOX and SO2 from flue gas in an integrated FGD-CABR system by sulfur cycling-mediated Fe (II) EDTA regeneration. Environ. Res. 205, 112541 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Stanienda-Pilecki, K. J. The use of limestones built of carbonate phases with increased Mg content in processes of flue gas desulfurization. Minerals 11(10), 1044 (2021).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Fedorchenko I, Oliinyk A, Fedoronchak T, Zaiko T, Kharchenko A. The development of a genetic method to optimize the flue gas desulfurization process. MoMLeT+ DS. 2021:16173.

Tadepalli, A., Pujari, K. N. & Mitra, K. A crystallization case study toward optimization of expensive to evaluate mathematical models using Bayesian approach. Mater. Manufact. Process. 38(16), 21272134 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhu, X. et al. Application of machine learning methods for estimating and comparing the sulfur dioxide absorption capacity of a variety of deep eutectic solvents. J. Clean. Product. 363, 132465 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Grimaccia, F., Montini, M., Niccolai, A., Taddei, S. & Trimarchi, S. A machine learning-based method for modelling a proprietary SO2 removal system in the oil and gas sector. Energies 15(23), 9138 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Xie Y, Chi T, Yu Z, Chen X. SO2 prediction for wet flue gas desulfurization based on improved long and short-term memory. In: 2022 4th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA). 2022, pp. 3215

Yu, H., Gao, M., Zhang, H. & Chen, Y. Dynamic modeling for SO2-NOx emission concentration of circulating fluidized bed units based on quantum genetic algorithm: Extreme learning machine. J. Clean. Product. 324, 129170 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yin, X. et al. Enhancing deep learning for the comprehensive forecast model in flue gas desulfurization systems. Control Eng. Pract. 138, 105587 (2023).

Article Google Scholar

Makomere, R., Rutto, H., Koech, L. & Banza, M. The use of artificial neural network (ANN) in dry flue gas desulphurization modelling: LevenbergMarquardt (LM) and Bayesian regularization (BR) algorithm comparison. Canad. J. Chem. Eng. 101(6), 32733286 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Uddin, G. M. et al. Artificial intelligence-based emission reduction strategy for limestone forced oxidation flue gas desulfurization system. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 142(9), 092103 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Adams, D., Oh, D., Kim, D. & Lee, C. Prediction of SOxNOx emission from a coal-fired CFB power plant with machine learning: Plant data learned by deep neural network and least square support vector machine. J. Clean. Product. 270, 122310 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zurada J. Introduction to artificial neural systems. West Publishing Co.; 1992.

Agatonovic-Kustrin, S. & Beresford, R. Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. Anal. 22(5), 717727 (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Naderi K, Foroughi A, Ghaemi A. Analysis of hydraulic performance in a structured packing column for air/water system: RSM and ANN modeling. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2023:109521.

Khoshraftar, Z. & Ghaemi, A. Modeling and prediction of CO2 partial pressure in methanol solution using artificial neural networks. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 6, 100364 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ghaemi, A., Karimi Dehnavi, M. & Khoshraftar, Z. Exploring artificial neural network approach and RSM modeling in the prediction of CO2 capture using carbon molecular sieves. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 7, 100310 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zafari, P. & Ghaemi, A. Modeling and optimization of CO2 capture into mixed MEA-PZ amine solutions using machine learning based on ANN and RSM models. Results Eng. 19, 101279 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kashaninejad, M., Dehghani, A. A. & Kashiri, M. Modeling of wheat soaking using two artificial neural networks (MLP and RBF). J. Food Eng. 91(4), 602607 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Leite, M. S. et al. Modeling of milk lactose removal by column adsorption using artificial neural networks: Mlp and Rbf. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Quart. 25(4), 369382 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sharif, A. A. Chapter 7: Numerical modeling and simulation. In Numerical models for submerged breakwaters (ed. Sharif Ahmadian, A.) 109126 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016).

Chapter Google Scholar

Hemmati, A., Ghaemi, A. & Asadollahzadeh, M. RSM and ANN modeling of hold up, slip, and characteristic velocities in standard systems using pulsed disc-and-doughnut contactor column. Sep. Sci. Technol. 56(16), 27342749 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Torkashvand, A., Ramezanipour Penchah, H. & Ghaemi, A. Exploring of CO2 adsorption behavior by Carbazole-based hypercrosslinked polymeric adsorbent using deep learning and response surface methodology. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19(9), 88358856 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Speiser, J. L., Miller, M. E., Tooze, J. & Ip, E. A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling. Exp. Syst. Appl. 134, 93101 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Cano, G. et al. Automatic selection of molecular descriptors using random forest: Application to drug discovery. Exp. Syst. Appl. 72, 151159 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Chehreh Chelgani, S., Matin, S. S. & Hower, J. C. Explaining relationships between coke quality index and coal properties by Random Forest method. Fuel 182, 754760 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Park, S. et al. Predicting the salt adsorption capacity of different capacitive deionization electrodes using random forest. Desalination 537, 115826 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ghazwani, M. & Begum, M. Y. Computational intelligence modeling of hyoscine drug solubility and solvent density in supercritical processing: Gradient boosting, extra trees, and random forest models. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 10046 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hameed, M. M., AlOmar, M. K., Khaleel, F. & Al-Ansari, N. An extra tree regression model for discharge coefficient prediction: Novel, practical applications in the hydraulic sector and future research directions. Math. Problem. Eng. 2021, 7001710 (2021).

Google Scholar

Ahmad, M. W., Reynolds, J. & Rezgui, Y. Predictive modelling for solar thermal energy systems: A comparison of support vector regression, random forest, extra trees and regression trees. J. Clean. Product. 203, 810821 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Aftab, R. A. et al. Support vector regression-based model for phenol adsorption in rotating packed bed adsorber. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30(28), 7163771648 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kooh, M. R. R., Thotagamuge, R., Chou Chau, Y.-F., Mahadi, A. H. & Lim, C. M. Machine learning approaches to predict adsorption capacity of Azolla pinnata in the removal of methylene blue. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 132, 104134 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Song, Z., Shi, H., Zhang, X. & Zhou, T. Prediction of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids using machine learning methods. Chem. Eng. Sci. 223, 115752 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Khoshraftar, Z. & Ghaemi, A. Modeling of CO2 solubility in piperazine (PZ) and diethanolamine (DEA) solution via machine learning approach and response surface methodology. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 8, 100457 (2023).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Belyadi, H. & Haghighat, A. Chapter 5Supervised learning. In Machine learning guide for oil and gas using python (eds Belyadi, H. & Haghighat, A.) 169295 (Gulf Professional Publishing, 2021).

More:
Modeling based on machine learning to investigate flue gas desulfurization performance by calcium silicate absorbent ... - Nature.com