2022 MAY 11 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Insurance Daily News -- A patent by the inventors Hatch, Thomas S. (Lehi, UT, US), filed on September 7, 2018, was published online on April 19, 2022, according to news reporting originating from Alexandria, Virginia, by NewsRx correspondents.
Patent number 11310283 is assigned to VMware Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States).
The following quote was obtained by the news editors from the background information supplied by the inventors: Recent years have seen rapid development in software products and electronic devices. For example, software products can affect functionality related to communication of data to and from electronic devices as well as operation of operating systems and/or individual applications installed on the electronic devices. As software and hardware become more complex, it becomes increasingly difficult to effectively secure information contained on electronic devices as well as information transmitted to and from electronic devices (e.g., over the Internet). Indeed, in an attempt to gather information, many individuals use viruses, spyware, malware, and other threatening tools to gather sensitive and/or valuable information.
While many tools exist for avoiding potential threats in cybersecurity of electronic devices, conventional cybersecurity systems often fail to adequately address potential security issues. For example, conventional cybersecurity systems typically utilize dedicated diagnostic tools for identifying whether a personal computer is compliant with a known security standard. Conventional diagnostic tools, however, are limited to providing a report of settings or configurations on a device that are out of compliance with a known set of standards. The report is then generally provided to an information technology (IT) administrator who manually addresses issues identified by the report or, alternatively, utilizes a separate software tool to facilitate remediation of various issues identified by the diagnostic tool.
In addition to failing to enable effective diagnosis and remediation of potential security issues, conventional cybersecurity systems can be inflexible and computationally prohibitive. For example, conventional cybersecurity systems are often limited to scanning a device for compliance with a specific security standard (e.g., Center for Internet Security (CIS) standards, Standard Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) standards, Payment Card Industry (PCI) standards, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)). As a result, conventional systems may provide an effective tool for identifying potential security threats for a select group of devices or programs uniquely tailored to a particular security standard. However, conventional cybersecurity systems may fail to effectively identify potential security threats for other devices or programs not specifically tailored to the security standard. Furthermore, while a device may simply run different security checks based on multiple security standards, running comprehensive checks based on multiple standards can be expensive and can utilize significant computing resources.
These along with additional problems and issues exist with regard to conventional cybersecurity systems.
In addition to the background information obtained for this patent, NewsRx journalists also obtained the inventors summary information for this patent: Embodiments of the present disclosure provide benefits and/or solve one or more of the foregoing and other problems in the art with systems, methods and computer-readable media that enforce security policies on a client device (or other computing device). In particular, in one or more embodiments, the disclosed systems enforce security policies by performing operations that enable an agent on the client device to both scan and fix security issues. For example, the disclosed systems can enforce a security policy by performing an idempotent operation in which a check and a fix of a security policy are the same operation (e.g., a check operation is the fix operation). In this way, the systems described herein can effectively identify and remediate configuration settings of a client device out of compliance with security standards using a single software agent.
In addition, in one or more embodiments the disclosed systems provide a policy-driven approach to enforcing security policies applicable to a wider range of client devices and applications. Indeed, by providing a policy-driven approach to enforcing security policies, the disclosed systems can enable a client device to comply with multiple security standards while performing a fewer number of operations than conventional systems, thereby improving performance of the client device without sacrificing substantial processing resources. In addition, by enforcing security policies using a policy-driven approach, the disclosed systems provide more effective security across a wider range of client devices and applications for which different security standards may be better suited to address potential security issues.
Additional features and advantages of one or more embodiments of the present disclosure are outlined in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of such example embodiments.
The claims supplied by the inventors are:
1. A system comprising: at least one processor; and a computer-readable medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause a computing device to: maintain a plurality of security policies, the plurality of security policies including: a plurality of configuration states associated with configuration settings of a client device, the configuration settings referring to one or more settings of an application or operating system on the client device that grant or restrict access to one or more intended functionalities of the application or operating system; and mapping information associating the plurality of security policies to a plurality of security standards; receive a request to enforce a first security standard from the plurality of security standards; identify a first subset of security policies from the plurality of security policies having mapping information associated with the first security standard for enforcement on the client device, wherein enforcing the first security standard includes causing the client device to perform an operation to enforce a configuration state for a corresponding configuration setting defined by a security policy from the identified subset of security policies regardless of a current state of the configuration setting prior to receiving the request to implement the plurality of security policies on the client device; determine whether an exemption applies to at least one of the first subset of security policies; in response to determining that the exemption applies to the at least one of the first subset of security policies, bypass enforcement of the at least one of the first subset of security policies; and identify a second subset of security policies from the plurality of security policies having mapping information associated with a second security standard for enforcement on the client device.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the operation to enforce the configuration state includes an idempotent operation in which a check and a fix of the security policy are the same operation.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions cause the computing device to: receive a report including information associated with enforcing at least one of the first or second subset of security policies on the client device; and generate a compliance report indicating a measure of compliance with at least one of the first or second security standard.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein generating the compliance report further includes: based on overlap between mapping information for the first subset of security policies and the mapping information associated with the second security standard, providing, within the compliance report, an indication of a second measure of compliance with the second security standard.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions cause the computing device to provide an option to request enforcement of the second security standard.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein enforcing the second security standard includes causing the client device to perform one or more operations to enforce one or more configuration states for one or more corresponding configuration settings defined by the second subset of security policies.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of security standards includes two or more of Center for Internet Security (CIS) standards, Standard Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) standards, Payment Card Industry (PCI) standards, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) standards, and wherein the instructions further cause the computing device to: generate the mapping information for the plurality of security policies by mapping the plurality of configuration states associated with configuration settings of the client device to respective security standards from the plurality of security standards.
8. A computer-implemented method comprising: maintaining a plurality of security policies, the plurality of security policies including: a plurality of configuration states associated with configuration settings of a client device, the configuration settings referring to one or more settings of an application or operating system on the client device that grant or restrict access to one or more intended functionalities of the application or operating system; and mapping information associating the plurality of security policies to a plurality of security standards; receiving a request to enforce a first security standard from the plurality of security standards; identifying a first subset of security policies from the plurality of security policies having mapping information associated with the first security standard for enforcement on the client device, wherein enforcing the first security standard includes causing the client device to perform an operation to enforce a configuration state for a corresponding configuration setting defined by a security policy from the identified subset of security policies regardless of a current state of the configuration setting prior to receiving the request to implement the plurality of security policies on the client device; determining whether an exemption applies to at least one of the first subset of security policies; in response to determining that the exemption applies to the at least one of the first subset of security policies, bypassing enforcement of the at least one of the first subset of security policies; and identifying a second subset of security policies from the plurality of security policies having mapping information associated with a second security standard for enforcement on the client device.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, further including: receiving a report including information associated with enforcing at least one of the first or second subset of security policies on the client device; and generating a compliance report indicating a measure of compliance with at least one of the first or second security standard.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein generating the compliance report further includes: based on overlap between mapping information for the first subset of security policies and the mapping information associated with the second security standard, providing, within the compliance report, an indication of a second measure of compliance with the second security standard.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein enforcing the second security standard includes causing the client device to perform one or more operations to enforce one or more configuration states for one or more corresponding configuration settings defined by the second subset of security policies.
12. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by at least one processor, cause a computing device to: maintain a plurality of security policies, the plurality of security policies including: a plurality of configuration states associated with configuration settings of a client device, the configuration settings referring to one or more settings of an application or operating system on the client device that grant or restrict access to one or more intended functionalities of the application or operating system; and mapping information associating the plurality of security policies to a plurality of security standards; receive a request to enforce a first security standard from the plurality of security standards; identify a first subset of security policies from the plurality of security policies having mapping information associated with the first security standard for enforcement on the client device, wherein enforcing the first security standard includes causing the client device to perform an operation to enforce a configuration state for a corresponding configuration setting defined by a security policy from the identified subset of security policies regardless of a current state of the configuration setting prior to receiving the request to implement the plurality of security policies on the client device; determine whether an exemption applies to at least one of the first subset of security policies; in response to determining that the exemption applies to the at least one of the first subset of security policies, bypass enforcement of the at least one of the first subset of security policies; and identify a second subset of security policies from the plurality of security policies having mapping information associated with a second security standard for enforcement on the client device.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, further including instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the computing device to: receive a report including information associated with enforcing at least one of the first or second subset of security policies on the client device; and generate a compliance report indicating a measure of compliance with at least one of the first or second security standard.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein generating the compliance report further includes: based on overlap between mapping information for the first subset of security policies and the mapping information associated with the second security standard, providing, within the compliance report, an indication of a second measure of compliance with the second security standard.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12, wherein enforcing the second security standard includes causing the client device to perform one or more operations to enforce one or more configuration states for one or more corresponding configuration settings defined by the second subset of security policies.
URL and more information on this patent, see: Hatch, Thomas S. Scanning and remediating configuration settings of a device using a policy-driven approach. U.S. Patent Number 11310283, filed September 7, 2018, and published online on April 19, 2022. Patent URL: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=11310283.PN.&OS=PN/11310283RS=PN/11310283
(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)
Read the original here:
Patent Issued for Scanning and remediating configuration settings of a device using a policy-driven approach (USPTO 11310283): VMware Inc. - Insurance...
- Google researchers have cracked a key internet security tool - Recode [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2017]
- Letter: Internet security is in jeopardy - INFORUM [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2017]
- New internet security device launched to safeguard schools against child abuse - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2017]
- Everything You Need to Know About Cloudbleed, the Latest Internet Security Disaster - Gizmodo [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2017]
- Data from internet-connected teddy bears held ransom, security expert says - Fox News [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- Emsisoft Internet Security 2017.2.0.7219 - TechCentral.ie [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- What you need to know about 'Cloudbleed,' the latest internet security bug - Globalnews.ca [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- Google cracks longtime pillar of internet security - MarketWatch [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- BullGuard | Internet Security and Antivirus protection ... [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2017]
- Internet Storm Center - SANS Internet Storm Center [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2017]
- Internet-connected 'smart' devices are dunces about security - ABC News [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Derry internet security expert warns that advanced internet technology 'a risk to us all' - Derry Now [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Firewall Test, Web Tools and Free Internet Security Audit ... [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Internet security in the spotlight: How is the internet safer today than it was 20 years ago? - Mobile Business Insights (blog) [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Jim Mullen: Unsocial internet security | Columnists | auburnpub.com - Auburn Citizen [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Internet security company launches a perfume line to promote cybersecurity - Mashable [Last Updated On: March 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 12th, 2017]
- Internet security - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: March 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 12th, 2017]
- Are you undermining your web security by checking on it with the wrong tools? - The Register [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Bruce Schneier on New Security Threats from the Internet of Things - Linux.com (blog) [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Carpe Diem: home internet security - KFOX El Paso [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Motivation Monday: home internet security - KFOX El Paso [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Medical records of 26m patients at risk because of GP surgeries' failing internet security - The Sun [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Free Internet Security | Why Comodo Internet Security Suite ... [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Internet Security Software | Trend Micro USA [Last Updated On: March 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 18th, 2017]
- Fix crap Internet of Things security, booms Internet daddy Cerf - The Register [Last Updated On: March 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 21st, 2017]
- Internet of Things security: What happens when every device is smart and you don't even know it? - ZDNet [Last Updated On: March 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 21st, 2017]
- CUJO is cuter than Wall-E, and it's the only internet security device you'll ever need - Yahoo News [Last Updated On: March 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 21st, 2017]
- The Senate just voted to undo landmark rules covering your Internet privacy - Washington Post [Last Updated On: March 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 25th, 2017]
- What the Cloudbleed disaster says about the state of internet security - Information Age [Last Updated On: March 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 25th, 2017]
- Google Has Declared Symantec Harmful To Internet Security - UPROXX [Last Updated On: March 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 25th, 2017]
- Internet Security Analysts: North Korea Is Planning a Global Bank Heist - Breitbart News [Last Updated On: March 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 28th, 2017]
- Internet Security Firm Confirms WikiLeaks 'Vault 7' At Least 40 Cyberattacks Tied to the CIA - The Ring of Fire Network [Last Updated On: April 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 14th, 2017]
- Homeland Security warns of 'BrickerBot' malware that destroys unsecured internet-connected devices - ZDNet [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2017]
- A Global Industry First: Industrial Internet Consortium and Plattform Industrie 4.0 to Host Joint IIoT Security ... - Business Wire (press release) [Last Updated On: April 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 20th, 2017]
- Mucheru urges private sector to boost investment in internet security - The Standard (press release) [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2017]
- Cloudflare debuts a security solution for IoT - TechCrunch [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2017]
- Russian-controlled telecom hijacks financial services' Internet traffic - Ars Technica [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2017]
- Avira Internet Security Suite v15.0.26 - TechCentral.ie [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2017]
- NSA To Limit Some Collection Of Internet Communication - NPR [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2017]
- Report Indicates '10 Concerts' Facebook Trend Could Compromise Your Internet Security - Complex [Last Updated On: April 29th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 29th, 2017]
- "Improving the World" through Internet Security: Chatting with David Gorodyansky, CEO of AnchorFree - Huffington Post [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Don't Fall For This Tech Support Scam Targeting PC Users - KTLA [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Yikes! Antivirus Software Fails Basic Security Tests - Tom's Guide [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Watch Hackers Sabotage an Industrial Robot Arm - WIRED [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2017]
- Decoding Internet Security: Spear phishing - Washington Post [Last Updated On: May 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 5th, 2017]
- From the Desk of Jay Fallis: To internet vote, or not to internet vote - BarrieToday [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2017]
- Crippling cyberattack continues to spread around the world - Los Angeles Times [Last Updated On: May 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 14th, 2017]
- Cyber Security Experts: Russia Disproportionately Targeted by Malware - Voice of America [Last Updated On: May 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 14th, 2017]
- The Latest: 29000 Chinese institutions hit by cyberattack - ABC News [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2017]
- Cyberattack Aftershock Feared as US Warns of Its Complexity - New York Times [Last Updated On: May 15th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 15th, 2017]
- This week's poll: Priorities for improving internet security - The Engineer [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2017]
- Akamai Releases First Quarter 2017 State of the Internet / Security Report - PR Newswire (press release) [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2017]
- Do Macs get viruses? - PC Advisor [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2017]
- Massive Ransomware Attack Underscores Threats To Internet Security - Benzinga [Last Updated On: May 19th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 19th, 2017]
- Security News This Week: Hoo-Boy, Mar-a-Lago's Internet Is Insecure - WIRED [Last Updated On: May 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 20th, 2017]
- Internet security firm calls for law to compel information sharing to ... - The Star, Kenya [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2017]
- Check It Out: No need to unplug after reading books on internet security - The Columbian [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2017]
- How to beat security threats to 'internet of things' - BBC News - BBC News [Last Updated On: May 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 25th, 2017]
- Best Mac antivirus 2017 - Macworld UK [Last Updated On: May 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 25th, 2017]
- Avira, Kaspersky Top Windows 10 Antivirus Tests - Tom's Guide [Last Updated On: May 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 25th, 2017]
- Paranoid about internet security? Here are the most secure OS options - The American Genius [Last Updated On: May 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 28th, 2017]
- Blockchain Offers Hope for the Broken Internet - Fortune [Last Updated On: May 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 28th, 2017]
- New uses for RFID and security for the internet of things - Phys.Org [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2017]
- Security Best Practices for the Internet of Things - Web Host Industry Review [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2017]
- Internet infrastructure security guidelines for Africa unveiled - Premium Times [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2017]
- In addressing internet security issues, make sure to provide solutions - Minneapolis Star Tribune [Last Updated On: May 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 31st, 2017]
- Whistic Partners with the Center for Internet Security to Extend the ... - PR Web (press release) [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- Internet Security Alliance: NIST framework metrics should focus on threats - Inside Cybersecurity (subscription) [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- China cyber-security law will keep citizens' data within the Great Firewall - The Register [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- Cyber security: Africa gets Internet security guidelines - TheNewsGuru [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- China to Implement Its First Law on Internet Security After Ransomware Attack - Sputnik International [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- Decoding Internet Security: Ransomware - Washington Post [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- Internet security upgrade on course - Business Daily (press release) (blog) [Last Updated On: June 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 1st, 2017]
- What's the Safest Laptop For Internet Security? - HuffPost [Last Updated On: June 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 2nd, 2017]
- Every Day Is Internet Security Day - The Chief-Leader [Last Updated On: June 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 3rd, 2017]
- 5 Reasons why internet security is crucial in 2017 - Techworm [Last Updated On: June 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 3rd, 2017]
- Are Pop-Ups An Internet Security Threat? - Good Herald [Last Updated On: June 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 4th, 2017]
- 3 Ways Software Programs Can Help With Internet Security in 2017 - Geek Snack [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- Inside Social Security: Make every day your internet security day - Santa Ynez Valley News [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- SOCIAL SECURITY: Every day is internet security day - Palm Beach Post [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]