Gizmodo Monday Puzzle: You Don’t Have to Play Chess to Be the Queen – Yahoo News

I have three chess puzzles for you this week, but you dont need to know the rules of chess for two of them. These two are variants of the famous eight queens puzzle, which asks solvers to position eight queens on an eight-by-eight board such that no two queens attack each other. The eight queens puzzle requires a little too much trial and error for my taste, which perhaps is why the problem more often shows up in computer science courses as an exercise in writing programs that search through cases for you.

The world of chess puzzles is full of beautiful and often humorous constructions, but sometimes one needs extensive experience to solve or even appreciate them. The most common type of chess puzzle depicts a position and challenges solvers to force a checkmate in a given number of moves. This weeks third puzzle throws a delightful twist into this standard genre, instead asking you to find a move that does NOT instantly checkmate. Youll need to know the rules of chess for this one. As chess puzzles go, its not exceedingly difficult, but hopefully gives a flavor for how amusing these compositions can get.

Read more

Knights attack every square that can be reached in an L shape as follows: two squares horizontally (left or right) and one square vertically (up or down) or two squares vertically and one square horizontally. What is the largest number of knights that you can fit on a standard eight-by-eight chess board, such that no two knights attack each other?

In the position below, find a move for white that does NOT cause an instant checkmate. Karl Fabel, an ingenious and prolific chess composer, published this in 1952.

Composed by Karl Fabel

Composed by Karl Fabel

Ill be back next Monday with the answers and a new puzzle. Do you know a cool puzzle that you think should be featured here? Message me on Twitter @JackPMurtagh or email me at gizmodopuzzle@gmail.com

Did you solve last weeks puzzle in time?

You sell calendars without years written on them. If somebody wants a 2024 calendar, you give them one whose days of the week match up correctly with 2024 (January 1st is a Monday, January 2nd is a Tuesday, etc.)

Find the answers below. Shout-out to PeterE for sniping all of them and for calling the Gregorian calendar Greggys system.

1. There are 14 different calendars. Years can begin with any of the seven days of the week, and years either have 365 days or 366 days (leap years). This results in 14 total possibilities.

2. 2034 is the next time the 2023 calendar will be used again. Every non-leap year that passes, the days shift forward by one. Think of it this way: 2023 began with a Sunday, and every seven days after that, the week resets to Sunday (Jan 8th, Jan 15th, etc.). So starting with the 1st and adding any number thats divisible by seven (7, 14, 21, 28,...) gets you back to Sunday. 364 is divisible by seven (7 x 52 = 364), so adding that to 1 yields 365, the last day of the year. This means December 31st was also a Sunday, leading to 2024 beginning with a Monday. All non-leap years work like this. After a leap year, the days shift forward by two because of the extra day.

With this in hand, we can calculate when the 2023 calendar (non-leap year beginning with Sunday) will recur. Days shift forward by 1 each year, except after a leap year, when they shift forward by 2:

Graphic: Jack Murtagh

Since 2034 is not a leap year and begins with a Sunday, it uses an identical calendar to 2023.

3. The largest possible gap between uses of the same calendar is 40 years. You wouldnt be alone if you came up with 28. Ill explain why 28 is a natural guess and then how the gap can actually be as large as 40.

Leap years are rarer than non-leap years, so it stands to reason that gaps will be larger between leap years. After a leap year, the subsequent years shift days according to the pattern: 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, and so on (you can see this in the table above starting at 2025). So every leap year (every four years) is five days shifted forward (2+1+1+1) from the previous leap year (e.g. 2028 is the leap year after 2024 and it begins with a Saturday, five days after 2024s Monday). Starting at a leap year, every four years, the days shift forward by five and you need to do this seven times before cycling back to the same starting day. It takes 28 years to pass through seven leap years (indeed, 2052 is 28 years after 2024 and the first leap year after it to begin with a Monday).

One huge exception can extend or shrink this number. Years divisible by 100 skip a leap year (unless theyre divisible by 400). 2100, 2200, etc. will not be leap years. Consider the 2072 calendar: a leap year which begins on a Friday. 28 years later will be 2100 and will also begin on a Friday, but its not a leap year! Wed have to continue 12 more years before repeating the 2072 calendar in 2112.

More from Gizmodo

Sign up for Gizmodo's Newsletter. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Click here to read the full article.

Read the original post:
Gizmodo Monday Puzzle: You Don't Have to Play Chess to Be the Queen - Yahoo News

Related Posts

Comments are closed.